Actually it is a perfectly good argument as far as I'm concerned. I do believe no machine should be patentable. I don't believe the patent system achieves it's supposed goals at all, software or not.
It's not a race, but it's nice to get to know more about the universe during your lifetime.
Someone has to be the first to cross the line, and someone has to pay for it, otherwise science will just come to a standstill.
Well the significant argument in TFS is the idea that the confirmation could have happened a decade ago rather than now, which certainly would've made a difference in the development rate of theoretical physics. "In America" is just a free e-peen extender that comes with it, which CERN just got instead.
Had they not cancelled the Superconducting Super Collider, chances are high they would've also beat Aperture to the Supercolliding Super Button which history proved to be just a logical step away. Oh well. I'm not American anyway, my country didn't lose anything because it's never had anything to being with. Woohoo!
Office is on the way out because everything is becoming Web2.0 or even Web3.0-ized, negating the need for any manually composed document as inter-organization (as well as intra-organization) data passing no longer targets directly other humans but servers that automatically parse and process it. Windows is on the way out because the web is platform agnostic. Document professionals (for those things that still have to be done in document format such as instruction booklets) don't use Office, and most often don't use Windows either.
Sometimes it works. A few ages ago a friend gave me his old cellphone - one of those Samsung "Slim Line" ones - but at the moment it was uncharged; when I got it charged it turned out it was locked, I didn't have the password and couldn't get a hold of him to ask, so I figured 4 numbers couldn't be that hard and tried my best to guess. I couldn't. Fast-forward one week and I finally get around to asking him about the password.. What was it? 8888. The worst part is that I did try just enetering the same number, but stopped at 5555 because I thought "he can't be that naive". LOL
It'll be like living in a zoo, except now the zoo is huge, the animals include humans, and the zoo-keepers are human-invented machines. The question is not if, the question is when. The singularity will undoubtedly overwhelm any silly human politics or economics that try to restrain it.
3D printing doesn't really automate anything that's not already automatic, the only significant difference in this context is that it's cheaper and easier for lower quantities and smaller spaces than industrial methods such as injection molding.
Of course patents and copyright will try to get in the way. Thankfully they'll fail miserably like they always do.
It wouldn't. This only works against specular reflections, which works with real drops because they're otherwise transparent, but your e-ink suit wouldn't be otherwise transparent in any sense of the word. And even if it was, you'd be in the middle.
Driving with sunglasses at night? Must admit I've never tried it, but doesn't sound like a particularly good idea. There are things you need to see out there that aren't exactly well lit.
Very clever idea, yes, but I wouldn't call it impressive. It's all very simple technology we've had for a while now. Just one of those "Why hadn't anyone thought of that?" ideas.
Just because it drives itself "during predictable, low-speed conditions" (quote from TFS) doesn't mean there doesn't need to be a human to deal with non-predictable conditions, and that's arguably when being sober matters the most. In a limo there's always a sober human (hopefully) in the front.
I do think proprietary software sucks just because it's proprietary. I've never claimed it to have anything to do with security, I'm sure the Linux desktop will get malware too if it ever has it's year, just as OS X has now. Anything with a large enough (end-)user base and no totalitarian walled garden will - making security-wise perfect code is really hard and comes with tradeoffs many aren't willing to make especially in consumer software. I still wouldn't touch a totalitarian walled garden OS with a 6.096m long pole. Security becomes useless when it reaches the point where it prevents you from doing with your device what you wanted to do with it in the first place.
1. All the injuries with the mouse happen because of improper, unbalanced desk setup - as do all the injuries resulting from "computer usage".
2. Even now, the people with mouse-related injuries are few enough that I personally have never seen any. With the "wave your hands in the air" alternatives (including touchscreen) I'm sure the injuries would actually be many, MANY more.
Slashdot Mirror
afaik it's 48bit memory addressing though what it supports
For the record, it's also what most current AMD64 implementations support: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64#Architectural_features
I agree with all the points you made, I was merely pointing out the reason this fire is self-sustaining, just as you observed.
they're not stupid.
Well, many of the ones that are pushing for patents/copyright/IP *are* stupid...
Actually it is a perfectly good argument as far as I'm concerned. I do believe no machine should be patentable. I don't believe the patent system achieves it's supposed goals at all, software or not.
I wasn't. I like my porn to be filmed from a little closer than that.
It's not a race, but it's nice to get to know more about the universe during your lifetime. Someone has to be the first to cross the line, and someone has to pay for it, otherwise science will just come to a standstill.
Well the significant argument in TFS is the idea that the confirmation could have happened a decade ago rather than now, which certainly would've made a difference in the development rate of theoretical physics. "In America" is just a free e-peen extender that comes with it, which CERN just got instead.
Had they not cancelled the Superconducting Super Collider, chances are high they would've also beat Aperture to the Supercolliding Super Button which history proved to be just a logical step away. Oh well. I'm not American anyway, my country didn't lose anything because it's never had anything to being with. Woohoo!
Office is on the way out because everything is becoming Web2.0 or even Web3.0-ized, negating the need for any manually composed document as inter-organization (as well as intra-organization) data passing no longer targets directly other humans but servers that automatically parse and process it. Windows is on the way out because the web is platform agnostic. Document professionals (for those things that still have to be done in document format such as instruction booklets) don't use Office, and most often don't use Windows either.
Sometimes it works. A few ages ago a friend gave me his old cellphone - one of those Samsung "Slim Line" ones - but at the moment it was uncharged; when I got it charged it turned out it was locked, I didn't have the password and couldn't get a hold of him to ask, so I figured 4 numbers couldn't be that hard and tried my best to guess. I couldn't. Fast-forward one week and I finally get around to asking him about the password.. What was it? 8888. The worst part is that I did try just enetering the same number, but stopped at 5555 because I thought "he can't be that naive". LOL
It'll be like living in a zoo, except now the zoo is huge, the animals include humans, and the zoo-keepers are human-invented machines. The question is not if, the question is when. The singularity will undoubtedly overwhelm any silly human politics or economics that try to restrain it.
3D printing doesn't really automate anything that's not already automatic, the only significant difference in this context is that it's cheaper and easier for lower quantities and smaller spaces than industrial methods such as injection molding. Of course patents and copyright will try to get in the way. Thankfully they'll fail miserably like they always do.
using actual water propagated in front of the projector
(Yes, they could've made it clearer... This is just a camera and a projector sitting together.)
Yes. I like my statements the way I like my power supplies: Redundant; which is the way I like my statements.
Yes. I like my statements the way I like my power supplies: Redundant. Which is the way I like my statements.
It wouldn't. This only works against specular reflections, which works with real drops because they're otherwise transparent, but your e-ink suit wouldn't be otherwise transparent in any sense of the word. And even if it was, you'd be in the middle.
Driving with sunglasses at night? Must admit I've never tried it, but doesn't sound like a particularly good idea. There are things you need to see out there that aren't exactly well lit.
Very clever idea, yes, but I wouldn't call it impressive. It's all very simple technology we've had for a while now. Just one of those "Why hadn't anyone thought of that?" ideas.
Try startpage.com - Google-based results, similar privacy to DDG, no-nonsense interface works fine in Dillo ('nuff said).
Just because it drives itself "during predictable, low-speed conditions" (quote from TFS) doesn't mean there doesn't need to be a human to deal with non-predictable conditions, and that's arguably when being sober matters the most. In a limo there's always a sober human (hopefully) in the front.
If you need that button you're doing it wrong.
I do think proprietary software sucks just because it's proprietary. I've never claimed it to have anything to do with security, I'm sure the Linux desktop will get malware too if it ever has it's year, just as OS X has now. Anything with a large enough (end-)user base and no totalitarian walled garden will - making security-wise perfect code is really hard and comes with tradeoffs many aren't willing to make especially in consumer software. I still wouldn't touch a totalitarian walled garden OS with a 6.096m long pole. Security becomes useless when it reaches the point where it prevents you from doing with your device what you wanted to do with it in the first place.
Ah, you have no idea how refreshing it is to see (read?) someone who gets it. Both this and your comment on the CLI article are spot-on. :-)
1. All the injuries with the mouse happen because of improper, unbalanced desk setup - as do all the injuries resulting from "computer usage". 2. Even now, the people with mouse-related injuries are few enough that I personally have never seen any. With the "wave your hands in the air" alternatives (including touchscreen) I'm sure the injuries would actually be many, MANY more.
Yeah, it's called the brain drain: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_drain