Microsoft's anti-Linux campaign isn't really aimed at the desktop, which Firefox is, as somebody else mentioned. In most of their statistics, whether they are meaningful or not, they target people using Linux in their servers. I remember as part of one anti-Linux campaign they tried to convince people that their systems would actually cost less money to maintain than Linux.
That doesn't matter. We didn't choose to use Apache, this site will use it regardless of whether or not we consent (and install it, etc.). Your argument makes no sense, and if you're just trying to point out his semantics then shame on you.
When did the parent poster say that Slashdot was only for Americans? He said it was U.S. centric. It was founded by Americans, and is edited by Americans. It mentions in the FAQ that it is U.S. centric as well. Your argument is based on something you fabricated yourself.
Just because the price is set at $400 doesn't mean they are going for that price. They will most likely not sell for such high of a price. In fact, not a single bid has been placed on the given auction as of yet. So while the seller may be asking for $400, if no one is willing to pay that, he might as well sell it for a billion dollars.
May I ask you what my IQ has to do with knowing how expensive housing is in Seoul? The entire post was a joke, which has nothing to do with my IQ. It does, however, reveal your understanding of sarcasm.
Six figure salaries in South Korean money. 100,000 South Korean Won is equal to approximately $85 US. Which makes sense, you know, because you know how far $85 US can get you in South Korea!
How about instead of making better batteries, we make it so the electronics don't use as much electricity? I think working on effeciency would be better. If someone is more knowledgable about this subject, though, feel free to correct me.
I don't really believe these specifications 100%, but don't you think stuff like this might encourage companies to make better, cheaper hardware more quickly? It could help stimulate the industry.
No, they most definitely know the difference. They're just exploting the semantics of the legal document to make money and get attention and market share.
I googled the shithead's numbers and came up with this: <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:vgjhZ1q q6xUJ:www.indiana.edu/~axolotl/pdf/26color.pdf+15- 1500+0.08-9+0.01-0.3&hl=en&start=3&ie=UTF-8">http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:vgjhZ1qq6xUJ:www.i ndiana.edu/~axolotl/pdf/26color.pdf+15-1500+0.08-9 +0.01-0.3&hl=en&start=3&ie=UTF-8</a> , which should explain it a little better.
If in fact it is the real memo, InternalMemos.com (from the same people who brought you FuckedCompany) has it. It just looks kind of suspicious because of how short it is, but that very well may be it.
Slashdot Mirror
He's probably only use the iPod. You know, the only iPod. Idiot.
Microsoft's anti-Linux campaign isn't really aimed at the desktop, which Firefox is, as somebody else mentioned. In most of their statistics, whether they are meaningful or not, they target people using Linux in their servers. I remember as part of one anti-Linux campaign they tried to convince people that their systems would actually cost less money to maintain than Linux.
That doesn't matter. We didn't choose to use Apache, this site will use it regardless of whether or not we consent (and install it, etc.). Your argument makes no sense, and if you're just trying to point out his semantics then shame on you.
When did the parent poster say that Slashdot was only for Americans? He said it was U.S. centric. It was founded by Americans, and is edited by Americans. It mentions in the FAQ that it is U.S. centric as well. Your argument is based on something you fabricated yourself.
Just because the price is set at $400 doesn't mean they are going for that price. They will most likely not sell for such high of a price. In fact, not a single bid has been placed on the given auction as of yet. So while the seller may be asking for $400, if no one is willing to pay that, he might as well sell it for a billion dollars.
Yep, you're right. Archos already has the Video iPod. *cough* Did they do some kind of deal with Apple like HP?
Is this a joke? The article is about playing games on big screens.
Hah.
Josh D.
crap@jd87.com
You have 1050 songs in 3 gigabytes? Sounds like a terrible encoding rate to me.
Or, your could combine the spoon and fork and get a SPORK!
May I ask you what my IQ has to do with knowing how expensive housing is in Seoul? The entire post was a joke, which has nothing to do with my IQ. It does, however, reveal your understanding of sarcasm.
Six figure salaries in South Korean money. 100,000 South Korean Won is equal to approximately $85 US. Which makes sense, you know, because you know how far $85 US can get you in South Korea!
How about instead of making better batteries, we make it so the electronics don't use as much electricity? I think working on effeciency would be better. If someone is more knowledgable about this subject, though, feel free to correct me.
Wait... now there's a New Mexico?
I don't really believe these specifications 100%, but don't you think stuff like this might encourage companies to make better, cheaper hardware more quickly? It could help stimulate the industry.
No, they most definitely know the difference. They're just exploting the semantics of the legal document to make money and get attention and market share.
Steven Hawking is a parapalegic... I don't know how it would work with him.
Where does it say that he worked for the store? He could have, but perhaps he did some other work for them.
Shit! Posted in code. Here.
I googled the shithead's numbers and came up with this: <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:vgjhZ1q q6xUJ:www.indiana.edu/~axolotl/pdf/26color.pdf+15- 1500+0.08-9+0.01-0.3&hl=en&start=3&ie=UTF-8">http: //www.google.com/search?q=cache:vgjhZ1qq6xUJ:www.i ndiana.edu/~axolotl/pdf/26color.pdf+15-1500+0.08-9 +0.01-0.3&hl=en&start=3&ie=UTF-8</a> , which should explain it a little better.
I hate to be the devil's advocate, but what about 9/11? Yes, it's a broad question, but maybe you can help answer it.
Actually, I think ManFox would be more fitting.
But it only had one button!
If in fact it is the real memo, InternalMemos.com (from the same people who brought you FuckedCompany) has it. It just looks kind of suspicious because of how short it is, but that very well may be it.
You are a DOUCHEBAG. Good day.