Slashdot Mirror


XM Radio Pulls PC Hardware

Didion Sprague writes "News.com is reporting that XM has decided to "quietly discontinue" the XMPCR -- a tiny USB satellite radio receiver for XM radio. Slashdot readers may remember last week's story about TimeTrax -- homebrewed software that allows XMPCR users to automatically record and tag each song. Now, XMPCR receivers are going for almost $400 on ebay. The RIAA, it should be noted, claims that they weren't "behind the discontinuation of the PCR"."

265 comments

  1. Make them change their mind by eric76 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If enough people over a period of time asked if they could hook it up to their computer and decided not to buy when they say no, maybe they would rethink their decision.

    1. Re:Make them change their mind by FlutterVertigo(gmail · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, that's not very effective in a lot of situations. Most businesses claim otherwise, but it's not as if people sit down with the boss and say, "Gee boss, everyone keeps asking for XM until they hear it's not available for their PC." And the boss then reporting it upward, and upward, etc.

      If we can't convince the Olympic media to quit using Cynthia Potter for the diving commentary, there's no way to convince XM to cave. And in my book, that's a higher priority. So it's a case of fix it before Beijing in 2008 or we refocus on fixing the diving.

    2. Re:Make them change their mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, yeah, that's the way it seems to work, Captain Obvious.

    3. Re:Make them change their mind by mutewinter · · Score: 1

      Hell, if I would have known this could have been done I might have thought about getting XM a while ago.

    4. Re:Make them change their mind by gilmet · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      test

      --

      Every time you read this, I am going against my principles.
    5. Re:Make them change their mind by boisepunk · · Score: 3, Funny
      The RIAA, it should be noted, claims that they weren't "behind the discontinuation of the PCR".

      Methinks he doth protest too much.

      --
      main(0)
    6. Re:Make them change their mind by Jaysyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even better, what do they do when someone hacks a car or desktop XM radio to do the same thing? Stop putting them in cars?

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    7. Re:Make them change their mind by linuxtelephony · · Score: 1

      Count me as one. A friend had an XM Roady 2 in the car when we were commuting to a class. It was OK. When I heard about the XMPCR and TimeTrax, I figured I would go out and buy one and sign up. The first few places I went were out of stock.

      I don't NEED the XM radio. AM and FM radio work just fine for me. However, it was the XMPCR and TimeTrax combination that sold me. Take that away, and I ain't buying.

      --
      . 62,400 repetitions make one truth -- Brave New World, Aldous Huxley
    8. Re:Make them change their mind by BLKMGK · · Score: 1

      Right there with you only I managed to find one - I THINK. The same shop was also selling modified ones with optical digital outputs for about $50 more. They were the ONLY place I could find them ni stock and I'm sure that's no longer the case. paid $69 for mine and have been sent tracking info so fingers are crossed that it arrives.

      Yes, I've sent hate mail to XM about this. Were it not for this package - that records ANALOG BTW - I'd have not gotten off the fence and purchased an XM device...

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
  2. Bloody shame they were pressured... by VinceWuzHere · · Score: 5, Informative
    Bloody shame, IMHO IANAL that they felt pressured to kill the product line and avoid any issues with the RIAA. Next news flash will be that the RIAA has pressured music stores to stop selling CDs and avoid "any needless distribution of our highly overprotected music".

    But here's the part that gets me... from the Product Information Page http://www.xmradio.com/xmpcr...

    "XM PCR Developer Communities:

    The XM PCR revolution is in full effect. Across the XM Nation, we're excited to see independent developers creating fantastic new versions of the XM PCR software for a wide range of platforms including Mac OS X, Linux, and Windows. Windows: XtreMe PCR

    Macintosh OS X: MacXM

    Unix: XMPCR perl scripts

    Linux: xmd-xmfe

    Did we miss a developer? Let us know if you're developing any PCR software."

    Heh. Looks like they missed TimeTrax.

    1. Re:Bloody shame they were pressured... by dnoyeb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      XM is not in any position to expend any amount of money on law suits or even legal wrangling. They will probably revisit this 5 years out...

      Did they ever hang that new satellite?

    2. Re:Bloody shame they were pressured... by nero4wolfe · · Score: 3, Informative
      Actually, you can still control most XM radio receivers via a computer; save streams to disk to do time shifting, etc. You're just forced to use an IR interface, rather than the direct USB interface. I imagine it wouldn't be that hard to figure out the IR codes sent by the XM remote.

      Of course, you'd lose the information about what channels are there, what's currently playing, etc.

      It's too bad if this sticks. I did a simple forwarder/transcoder that lets you control a xmpcr from a Tivo HMO; with the audio coming out from the Tivo.

    3. Re:Bloody shame they were pressured... by rob13572468 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      its even better: ALL xm chipsets are rs-232 controllable; its just a matter of setting up an interface and then you're all set. also, the "xm direct" has just been released which is basically a receiver that is designed to be controlled via an adapter to any number of xm-ready vehicle radios. it will be very simple to come up with an adapter that turns the xm direct into a clone of the PCR.

    4. Re:Bloody shame they were pressured... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Bloody shame, IMHO IANAL that they felt..."

      "Bloody shame, in my humble opinion i am not a lawyer that they felt"?

      Well... it almost made sense.

    5. Re:Bloody shame they were pressured... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      They will probably revisit this 5 years out...
      By which time congress WILL have made it illegal for individuals to record any kind of broadcast material...

    6. Re:Bloody shame they were pressured... by yoder · · Score: 1

      I'm just surprised that the RIAA is still an issue. There are just too many independant labels and distributors out there who treat their artists and customers fairly. Hopefully, people will begin to see this soon. When people stop buying (and downloading) music from the Mafia, then the Mafia will have to go away.

      --
      "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act!" -- George Orwell (Eric Arthur Blair)
    7. Re:Bloody shame they were pressured... by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      Of course, you'd lose the information about what channels are there, what's currently playing, etc.

      Point camera at radio.
      Do OCR of what is playing.

    8. Re:Bloody shame they were pressured... by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      XM-3 will launch either late 04 or early 05. Once it's up, they'll move XM-1 and XM-2 into the same orbit, and split broadcasting between them, to extend their lives. XM-4 will launch in ~2007, at which point 1 and 2 will be taken out of service.

  3. Ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who else thinks that the seller of that ebay item *may* have had something to do with this post?

    1. Re:Ebay by Klar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Item listing before posting on slashdot.
      Starting bid: US $379.99
      Number of bids: 0
      Hits: MPCR receivers are going for almost $400 on ebay .. wouldn't that only be true if there were any bids?

    2. Re:Ebay by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Who else thinks that the seller of that ebay item *may* have had something to do with this post?

      You then go on to prove that the RIAA is actually behind p2p music sharing and the clampdown on copying and sharing among normally innocent people.

      Gad! How arcane!

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    3. Re:Ebay by Klar · · Score: 1

      You happy now?
      Yes. :$

    4. Re:Ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Ebay by FlutterVertigo(gmail · · Score: 1

      I hope people code better than they research issues.

      Forget active auctions. Try looking at completed ones. Over the previous 4-5 days, there were three which sold via "Buy It Now" for $29.99, $29.99, and $40. If that was via BIN, then those as the prices the seller asked for - were they unloading them or naive?

    6. Re:Ebay by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      This just happend in the last 12-18 hours. As a matter of fact I was just fixing to order one for my computer and a seperate reciver for my wifes car.

      Guess I won't.

      That's only 200 startup and 17.00 per month that XM will not be getting out of us.

  4. Lotta Chatter: Orange Alert! by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Interesting
    homebrewed software that allows XMPCR users to automatically record and tag each song.

    I always assumed this was why DJ's talked over the intro to tunes, to mess up anyone recording, lord knows they could save their breath because who cares what DJ's have to say when your tune starts to play (you actually want them to shut the fsck up!)

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re: Lotta Chatter: Orange Alert! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > I always assumed this was why DJ's talked over the intro to tunes, to mess up anyone recording, lord knows they could save their breath because who cares what DJ's have to say when your tune starts to play (you actually want them to shut the fsck up!)

      This has been going on since long before people even had cassette recorders. I think it's just a matter of trying to cram more crap into a 24 hour day, same as playing songs to overlap each other, playing them at accelerated speed, talking ultra-fast during commercial disclaimers, etc.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Lotta Chatter: Orange Alert! by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd always assumed that too. One newer development I've noticed is the latest hit video clips player on some free-to-air TV channels often have a "glitch" in the audio.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    3. Re:Lotta Chatter: Orange Alert! by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Radio stations have always desired to "watermark" their feeds for various reasons which include:

      - A brand identity
      - Making sure diary-keeping listeners know and remember which station they are listening to
      - Making sure anything recorded is clear what station was recorded
      - Making sure that if the competition grabs a song from their air, they get an unclean copy that they can't use.
      - Complying with publisher requests to protect new content.

      "Clean" recordings are what you usually have to pay for. Any form of broadcast is expected to have some bit of interference either by signal technology, DJs doing their intro thing, or intentional mucking. Pure digital streams have to do more mucking than usual because their delivery system is so clean.

    4. Re: Lotta Chatter: Orange Alert! by Gooba42 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm curious how much extra the local cable company is making using crap like this.
      I've noticed a much more than usual cut-off of the commercials in the past year or so. It's only a second or two per commercial but over the course of the day that's god knows how many more ad spots they can run and how many companies get shorted on their ad dollars.

      --
      I just found out there's no such thing as the real world. It's just a lie you've got to rise above. - John Mayer
    5. Re:Lotta Chatter: Orange Alert! by Timber_Z · · Score: 0

      Got a good friend that has worked in radio, according to him, ideally a DJ should finish his last word just as the first note of the song starts. Difficult to time though.

    6. Re:Lotta Chatter: Orange Alert! by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      *"Clean" recordings are what you usually have to pay for.*

      but don't you pay for xm?

      (i'm not from usa, so i got no freakking idea, i just remember some of these were subscription based)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    7. Re:Lotta Chatter: Orange Alert! by FatigueStrain · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that most stations play with their equalizer settings to try to warp all the songs they play towards their format. So the same song played on a "hard rock" station will sound much more "hard rockish" than on a "soft rock" station. The only way to get something close to the original is really to rip it from the cd yourself.

    8. Re:Lotta Chatter: Orange Alert! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's weird. I always see posts about this talk over and cross fading problem when recording radio streams, but the only stations I've ever had any problems with that kind of thing are 80s and hip hop and the ultra commercial stuff where you expect they're going to try and get dumb on you. And even with those genres, it's not always the case if you stay away from the big stations.
      Yet, even with those most notorious stations with the beggar, whiner DJs who just can't shut up if you keep re-recording you can still end up with clean copies of masive playlists after just a few weeks of recording since those's greatest hits type genres are the ones where nearly identical playlists gets rotated endlessly anyway. Sure you end up with a few bad copies and a few good copies of the same track, but with DVDs being so cheap, who cares. Grab it all and sort it out later. The price is practically insignificant and if you find it painfull to go back through it and edit out the ones with problems then perhaps you're not really such a music fan after all.
      But on anything even slightly out of the mainstream in a commercial sense like roots dub, indies, chamber music or even techno sets I hardly ever see this kind of problem because those stations are usually DJ'd by people who have a passion for the music and want to get it out as clean as possible.
      Then going the other way with something like Old Time Radio, with those the ads are half the fun. That's not a good example really, but it does add to the point that there's just an enormous variety of streaming radio out there and its easy to ignore or re-edit the stations that try to make it hard.
      Of course I'm talking about IceCast and ShoutCast rather than XM. I can't convceive of paying the kind of money they're talking about when streaming Internet audio is already free and so good. I just bring some MP3 DVDs in the car. But I'm probably just not getting the really cool part.
      So what is the really cool part about XM?

    9. Re:Lotta Chatter: Orange Alert! by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      I realized just how drastic Syracuse's Hot 107.9 was when I was at SU when I bought a copy of Voice 5's "When you think about me" and noticed how different the whole message of the song is played slower. It's interesting that Windows Media Player gives me the capability to duplicate those modifications if I want to via ActiveX.

    10. Re:Lotta Chatter: Orange Alert! by rbullo · · Score: 1

      The equipment costs about $120 US, and the subscription is priced at $9.99/month.

      --
      OH NOES!!! IT APPEARS YUO DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO PAY FOR DIS HERE PIZZA! WAHT EVER ARE YOU GOING TO DO!?!?
  5. No bids? by DJ-Dodger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Can you really call it "going for almost $400" if nobody has actually bid on the item? Sounds more like "profiteers are trying get ridiculous prices like $400"

    1. Re:No bids? by romper · · Score: 5, Informative
      A simple search shows that they're going for about $100-$150.


      But who knows after Slashdot has its effect.

      --
      Right is wrong when left is right.
    2. Re:No bids? by GSITPilot · · Score: 1

      Check out this one then: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&cate gory=14980&item=5718056425&rd=1 That's awfully close to $400 to me.

    3. Re:No bids? by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

      There is at least one desperate person out there...
      Check this auction

    4. Re:No bids? by gl4ss · · Score: 0, Redundant

      XM Radio XMPCR - New - Discontinued - Rare - xm pcr New XM Radio XMPCR - New - Discontinued - Rare - xm pcr This seller accepts PayPal
      $312.27
      9 10h 15m
      Listing has pictures New New XM PCR XM SATELLITE RADIO XMPCR Rare Sold Out!!!!!! This seller accepts PayPal
      $379.99

      $399.99 -
      Buy It Now 15h 45m
      XM PCR XM Satellite Radio Receiver xmpcr XM PCR XM Satellite Radio Receiver xmpcr PayPal Buyer Protection Program
      $305.00
      24 22h 42m
      Listing has pictures New XM PCR XM Satellite Radio Receiver xmpcr This seller accepts PayPal
      $152.50
      17 2d 08h 10m
      New XM PCR XM Satellite Radio for your PC - XMPCR This seller accepts PayPal
      $195.50
      11 2d 11h 30m
      Listing has pictures New XM PCR XM Satellite Radio XMPCR This seller accepts PayPal

      cables, antenna, and software. mint condition!
      $152.50
      4 2d 12h 16m
      Listing has pictures New XM PCR XM Satellite Radio Receiver xmpcr This seller accepts PayPal
      $177.50
      8 2d 15h 54m
      Listing has pictures New XMPCR This seller accepts PayPal

      New In Box, hard too find Free Shipping
      $349.95 Buy It Now 2d 18h 31m
      XMPCR XM Radio - XMPC1000 XM PCR - Complete - New Cond. New XMPCR XM Radio - XMPC1000 XM PCR - Complete - New Cond. This seller accepts PayPal
      $132.50
      10 2d 18h 51m
      Listing has pictures New XMPCR - discontinued - slightly used - get one NOW PayPal Buyer Protection Program
      $123.50
      8 2d 20h 06m
      New XM PCR XM SATELLITE RADIO XMPCR Rare Sold Out!!!!!! New New XM PCR XM SATELLITE RADIO XMPCR Rare Sold Out!!!!!! This seller accepts PayPal
      $379.99

      $399.99 -
      Buy It Now 2d 20h 40m
      Listing has pictures New XM PCR XM Satellite Radio Receiver xmpcr This seller accepts PayPal
      $120.00
      1 4d 17h 58m
      XM Radio XMPCR Rare-Discontinued *Get it NOW!!* New XM Radio XMPCR Rare-Discontinued *Get it NOW!!* This seller accepts PayPal

      Excellent Condition...**FREE SHIPPING!!**
      $100.00
      2 4d 20h 13m
      Listing has pictures XM PCR Satellite Radio XMPCR Brand New Unopened Box This seller accepts PayPal
      $152.50
      8 5d 15h 51m
      XM Radio XMPCR - New - Discontinued - Rare - xm pcr New XM Radio XMPCR - New - Discontinued - Rare - xm pcr This seller accepts PayPal
      $152.50
      11 6d 09h 43m
      Listing has pictures New XM PCR Satellite Radio Receiver - never used - xmpcr PayPal Buyer Protection Program

      software and cables included - NEEDS ANTENNA only
      $150.00
      9 6d 09h 59m
      XMPCR New XMPCR This seller accepts PayPal

      New In Box, never touched by human hands
      $102.50
      6 6d 13h 30m
      New XM PCR XM SATELLITE RADIO XMPCR Rare opie anthony New New XM PCR XM SATELLITE RADIO XMPCR Rare opie anthony This seller accepts PayPal

      Last chance! FREE SHIPPING when paying with Paypal!!!!
      $399.99 Buy It Now 6d 21h 04m
      XM PCR XMPCR Satellite Radio Receiver RARE MINT New XM PCR XMPCR Satellite Radio Receiver RARE MINT PayPal Buyer Protection Program
      $347.00 Buy It Now 6d 21h 40m
      Listing has pictures New XM Radio XMPCR - Discontinued - Rare - xm pcr This seller accepts PayPal
      $200.00
      - 6d 22h 26m

      *****

      300-400 actual sale doesn't seem that far fetched.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:No bids? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was from Apple. There would be no problems selling it at $400. Its all about marketting. Doesn't say much for Apple users though.

  6. OK that does it. by cmacb · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm canceling my XM account.

    And um... It had nothing to do with this, or any other screw-ups with XM programming.

    1. Re:OK that does it. by siliconjunkie · · Score: 1

      I'm canceling my XM account.

      And um... It had nothing to do with this, or any other screw-ups with XM programming.


      ok, so what did it have to do with then? what's the deciding factor to your cancelling your account?

    2. Re:OK that does it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get Sirius... it's much much better!

      Sirius is like the Mac of satellite radio. For the same reasons, less people use it.

    3. Re:OK that does it. by orthogonal · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm canceling my XM account.
      And um... It had nothing to do with this, or any other screw-ups with XM programming.


      Parent isn't off-topic: he's riffing on the RIAA denial:
      "News.com is reporting that XM has decided to "quietly discontinue" the XMPCR.... The RIAA, it should be noted, claims that they weren't 'behind the discontinuation of the PCR'".

      While not a "freaking goggle fest", it's a smart and subtle jab at the RIAA's less-than-believable denial.

      I won't presume to speak for anyone else, but I got a grin from it and I'd have modded it up Funny. Modding it down off-topic is simply bizarrely wrong.

    4. Re:OK that does it. by David_W · · Score: 2, Funny
      Modding it down off-topic is simply bizarrely wrong.

      Didn't you know? The "off topic" mod is an alias for "didn't get the joke." ;)

  7. What the heck by FiReaNGeL · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't get what the fuss is all about... So, it let you download songs? Who's in it's right mind is gonna pay 400$ for a crappy radio that let me download songs? Hello? P2P? If you want to get (illegally) free songs, at least do it for FREE? :)

    1. Re:What the heck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but timeshifting is legal.

      You have a VCR don't you?

    2. Re:What the heck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because 99% of what you get from P2P is Fraunhofer-encoded CBR crap ripped from CD with who-know-what kind of shitty errors. At least with this device you could encode with some sort of control over the quality.

    3. Re:What the heck by huchida · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't get what the fuss is all about... So, it let you download songs? Who's in it's right mind is gonna pay 400$ for a crappy radio that let me download songs? Hello? P2P? If you want to get (illegally) free songs, at least do it for FREE? :)

      I'm not sure it's illegal. It's akin to taping off the radio, not sharing via P2P. In any event you're not broadcasting your IP when you'e doing it so there's little chance of getting caught.

      It's definitely not worth $400. But it might be worth $40 to me, if I had XM anyway. Find a channel (type of music) you like, tape it all day, come home to a neat little stack of songs to wade through...

    4. Re:What the heck by karmatic · · Score: 2, Informative

      The legal aspect is why this was so popular. Timeshifting is legal, the music is licensed, and you are authorized to listen to it. As such, you can legally store, and replay the music as you see fit. Needless to say, the RIAA dislikes this.

    5. Re:What the heck by Caraig · · Score: 2, Informative

      The thing is, recording from XM or any radio, for that matter (since XM is billing itself as satellite radio) falls under the time-shifting provisions of fair use. I can record a broadcast for later enjoyment, especially if I'm not able to listen to it when it broadcasts.

      So, as far as fair use goes, it's perfectly legal to rip from the XM stream.

      --
      "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
    6. Re:What the heck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just got mine yesterday - it was $50. As to the 400 dollars, how much have you spent on cds?

    7. Re:What the heck by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

      the RIAA quotes in the article were blathering about how people were turning "performances" into "recordings". are they playing voodoo grammar whack-a-mole here? or haven't we been taping the radio and TV broadcasts for YEARS?

      --
      MORTAR COMBAT!
    8. Re:What the heck by Ayaress · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not only are they playing word games, but they're not playing fair. These aren't performances being recorded, they're recordings themselves. When's the last time you heard of a live concert broadcast over XM? The only live broadcasts I see anymore are sports, news, and the occasional telethon.

    9. Re:What the heck by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

      In fact, there are rumors of a new XM device which has a 30 minute timeshift window/buffer built into it.

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    10. Re:What the heck by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

      Uhm.. there's at least two or three "live" channels on XM.. BBC Live comes to mind. :)

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    11. Re:What the heck by linx4prs · · Score: 1

      I assume that, even if it were illegal (probably not, like taping sonds off the radio) the RIAA would be there to monitor the download and sue anyone.

    12. Re:What the heck by Ayaress · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't have XM anymore, so I don't know, but I think my point still stands. There's a lot of other stations on XM, most of which are pretty much like all the local broadcast stations. Aslo, is the music on the "live" stations live, or just the people talking? Talk radio and DJ's are live on just about all stations, but live performances of music certainly can't count for a serious portion of broadcast music (FM, AM, or XM). And even if it did, timeshifting a broadcast you're authorized to see is still legal.

    13. Re:What the heck by rbullo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      From the Cusomer Agreement -

      You may not reproduce, rebroadcast, or otherwise transmit the programming, record the programming, charge admission specifically for the purpose of listening to the programming, or distribute play lists of the programming.
      So there.
      --
      OH NOES!!! IT APPEARS YUO DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH MONEY TO PAY FOR DIS HERE PIZZA! WAHT EVER ARE YOU GOING TO DO!?!?
  8. How much? by jm92956n · · Score: 5, Funny

    How much will it cost me to have my ebay link posted on the front page? Sure, you can find just about any sucker to buy a product if you show it to enough people; while it may take time, eventually you'll find either a person with too much money, or a person who lacks the ability to comprehend the value of money.

    It's "going" for $400 right now, yet there isn't a single bid.

    --
    An effective signature identifies a particular user amongst a base of thousands.
    1. Re:How much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well it worked, it just sold via Buy it Now for $399.99.

      I find it funny that XM/RIAA is worried about people getting music for "free" -- Just look at how much people are willing to pay for the ability to record and later listen to tunes/concerts/shows on XM radio.

      If XM were to secretly sell their overstock on eBay, they could make an incredible killing.

  9. pay service by chuckfucter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Isn't this kinda pointless, customers are paying for this service, it's like hooking up a vcr or tivo to your cable/satellite box and recording your shows (except the software tags the songs for you) I would think this would be a good thing for their service, that is, unless the RIAA asked them too (yea, yea I read the article)

    1. Re:pay service by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      unless the RIAA asked them too

      I'm so impressed and I'm sure the RIAA is too impressed how much credibility and power is given to the RIAA. Those guys are chuckling and counting their money and planning their next kiddie and grandma lawsuit.

      FWIW, the RIAA has nothing to do with the licensing of broadcast or performance material, only recorded material. The licensing for broadcast and performance material comes from ASCAP and BMI. If fact, one can license most all of the music in the world for $15 a year for audiences with less than 250 people.

  10. RIAA by Zorilla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The RIAA, it should be noted, claims that they weren't "behind the discontinuation of the PCR"

    Well, maybe not directly, but from XM's perpective, the possible threat of the RIAA coming to get them sure did.

    --

    It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  11. Woops by Klar · · Score: 1

    Should have read:

    Item listing before posting on slashdot.
    Starting bid: US $379.99
    Number of bids: 0
    Hits: under 150


    receivers are going for almost $400 on ebay - wouldn't that only be true if there were any bids?

  12. Not behind! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny


    The RIAA, it should be noted, claims that they weren't "behind the discontinuation of the PCR"."

    Er, you mean, like they were in front of it !?

  13. hmm... by iamdrscience · · Score: 3, Funny

    XMPCR? Couldn't they have come up with a catchier name like DRMXM2PCUSBABCDEFG.

    1. Re:hmm... by JiffyJeff · · Score: 1

      The bad thing is, most of us actually knew what that acronym meant up until ABCDEFG...

    2. Re:hmm... by Alsee · · Score: 1

      DRMXM2PCUSBABCDEFG ? The BCDEFG sequence is an obvious error.
      DRMXM2PCUSBAYBAB2U

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  14. XM Module by GoRK · · Score: 5, Informative

    First of all, XM are complete pieces of shit for doing this. The XMPCR was the only reason I even bought into satellite radio service in the first place. I use the XM-PCR on my Car PC and listen to it for hours every day.

    It's worth noting, though, that the XMPCR is a pretty simple device. It would be incredibly easy to build a DIY one out of any XM radio. Here's why:

    XM sells a receiver module to radio manufacturers. Essentially the satellite part of the radio hardware is made by XM and is the same on all units. This module exposes a serial interface (9600 baud TTL level) for control and it outputs digital audio (I forget what format). It's powered on 5V (or 3.3V -- i forget)

    Anyway, all the XMPCR has in it is a simple power supply circuit, a USB/Serial converter, a DAC and an antenna jack. All you would have to do to make your own is take the tuner module out of an existing radio and wire it up the same way. You could even use the same USB/Serial converter to make it 100% identical to the regular XMPCR. The serial number (used for activation and whatnot) can be queried out of the module with a command (or taken off the donor radio's label of course).

    1. Re:XM Module by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 5, Interesting

      i agree

      i had xm in my car through my pioneer deck and an addon xm receiver. i loved it so much, i couldn't wait to get something for my home computer (i've got a car pc here too, by chance). i could have bought some component, but the xmpcr was small, cheap, and worked

      plus, it is a very hacker friendly device. xm chose a well-supported by oss usb/serial adapter. they didn't have to. maybe they chose it by price ... either way, they chose one that's well supported. there are now plenty of apps out there available to do lots of cool stuff. they even promoted some of the bigger ones (a mac player, etc). some people even modded theirs to get digital output. being able to do that is just damn cool

      i now hope they don't start playing the directtv game and start turning off current xmpcr subscribers. that would make them complete pieces of shit to the second power

      --
      vodka, straight up, thank you!
    2. Re:XM Module by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Yup, I'm pretty certain you'll be seeing XMPCR compatible DIY kits for the Roady or SkyFi units within a month or two. Or an adapter board to sit between your USB or serial port and the XM Direct unit that talks to the headunit in my BMW - again, using a serial protocol of some sort, with a BlitzSafe adapter in the middle.


      XM just needs to suck it up and realize this is the way the game is played. You just have to try to keep it low profile, geek hobbyist only and then tell the RIAA you do not condone or support any such functionality. And let the geeks do their hacking and the rest of the sheeple just won't bother. As long as it requires soldering or breaking open plastic cases, it'll be off the scope and shouldn't attract any more of this RIAA-fodder media attention.


      Thank god all the Tivo hacks never attracted this kind of media frenzy. I've been sucking video off my Series 1 Tivo for several years now, it's just been low profile because it requires a moderate amount of technical know-how to install all the requisite software.

    3. Re:XM Module by morcheeba · · Score: 4, Informative

      XM is playing the game well, though. I looked into the chipsets that they use, and there is no point to pick off an unencrypted digital compressed signal -- you either get the lossy output that will produce artifacts when re-compressed, or the useless encrypted portion. Good engineering... until someone figures out which wire to probe on the raw IC.

    4. Re:XM Module by GoRK · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A car pc, do you say? Do you happen to use this program:

      http://www.mp3car.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?p =1 25414

      I only ask because I wrote it :) I was very excited at the end of last year when XM was really getting into supporting the XMPCR hackers. We were all very nervous that they would turn on us, but they very suprisingly did the opposite. It's highly unfortunate that they seem to have changed their tune.

      Another poster mentioned that the SkyFi 2 radio that is supposedly forthcoming is rumored to have a USB port and be computer controllable. If they are canning the XMPCR for this, then I can't say that I really blame them. Delphi makes the SkyFi and XM probably doesn't want to hurt sales of a new radio by offering a product with similar functionality for a lot less money (ie why would you buy a $150 skyfi2 for your computer when you could buy a $50 xmpcr?) XM makes the money from selilng the module to delphi anyway, so it's not like they are making any less money stopping the distribution of the PCR.

      Now here's a tangent ...

      It's also worth noting that if the skyfi 2 USB rumor has truth to it, it might be a good opportunity for them to fix some of the problems with the XMPCR such as the slow (9600bps) communications speed between the radio and the computer. It would also be slick if they added the ability to receive data through the unit - their network is capable of it -- XM weather radios that download and present gobs of data are available, but expensive.

      Something like USB (or bluetooth!) + a data cpable SkyFi 2 + A PocketPC could SIGNIFICANTLY enhande their traffic+weather offerings to provide maps, etc. right alongside the broadcast. As XM are currently fighting a war with local broadcast stations who are trying to prevent them from broadcasting "in their markets", this would certainly give them an edge in the fight, as it would turn XM into a 'weather data' service and not simply a radio broadcast. [To go further aside, this is a battle that I'd really like to see XM win.]

    5. Re:XM Module by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Informative
      Are you quite sure about that? What about the TOSLink digital adapters that people are using for the XMPCR (see here for the device I'm talking about)? I don't know if the output is lossy and digital or not - frankly, I don't think it matters, it's not like XM transmission quality is really at CD level or anything. If you want CD quality audio, you still need to rip a song off a CD.


      In any case, the difference in quality between the TOSLink digital output and the analog output apparently is only moderate anyway apparently. The point is that this was never about "closing the digital loophole" - there is no meaningful loophole to close here, the stuff people were recording was almost all D to A to D converted anyway. It was just the ease with which the access to the data feed gave to splice and dice and name MP3 files that seems to have caused the brick shitting. LOL, when you think about it, it's quite absurd - they just object to the labor saving aspect here.

    6. Re:XM Module by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 1

      nuh uh. mine is freebsd-based. it's currently out of the car (95 Accord EX sedan) because my desktop crashed and i needed a desktop. i appreciate the license on your code tho =)

      if the s2 comes with usb for the possibility of being computer controlled, that'd be sweet. however, one of the key selling points of the pcr (at least to me) was that it was a very simply device. if it does have usb for that reason, and my pcr dies or xm turns them off, i'll probably buy one ... but i hope it will be as easily hackable

      --
      vodka, straight up, thank you!
    7. Re:XM Module by morcheeba · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nice find! Yeah, the TOSLink is after the decompression. You're probably right - the digital link is probably not going to help improve the sound over the damage imposed by the compression.

    8. Re:XM Module by aberson · · Score: 1
      Note - This post is entirely conjecture:

      I'm willing to bet that the XM Direct box is EXACTLY the same as the XM PCR, but with a different outer box and connectors. They're both $49.99 and about the same size... Possibly the xmdirect isn't even using USB but is rs232. It makes sense when you realize that the XM USB driver is really just a USB-serial driver.

      The $50 "aftermarket adapter" boxes just interpret the control signals from your car stereo and translate them to the same protocol that TimeTrax and the XM PCR software use.

      If this is the case, then all you'd need to hook the xm direct up to your PC is a cable with the right ends on it.

    9. Re:XM Module by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
      I agree 100%. I actually have an XMDirect in my car right now, but since I use it I don't feel like pulling it apart. I'm considering getting another one, but as far as I can tell, you can't buy them standalone yet (I paid 300 dollars for my Blitzsafe BMW adapter + XMDirect, and I am not shelling out another 300 bucks just to get a unit to hack on).


      Anyway, hopefully we will all keep quiet about the XMDirect hackability potential until the things are readily available for 50 bucks at retail. I would hate to see somebody start selling serial/USB adapters or DIY kits for the XMDirect and then have XM discontinue that product too. Just need to keep this stuff slightly underground enough that it doesn't attract big media attention and get the RIAA coming down on XM again.

    10. Re:XM Module by aberson · · Score: 1

      they claim the MSRP is $49, but if nobody will sell it to you without that adapter then you have to pay at least $100 to get the XM Direct + one of the aftermarket adapters.

      In addition to a special rs232 or usb cable, you need a 12V power supply for it and appropriate connectors... easy enough for somebody comfortable walking the aisles of radio shack, but perhaps enough of a "hack" that XM won't care as much... of course, if it is that easy to build the cable, then cable + power supply packages should appear on ebay any day now.

    11. Re:XM Module by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
      ...you either get the lossy output that will produce artifacts when re-compressed,...

      What about applying some DSP technique on the decompressed signal in order to pre-compensate the recompression losses?

      The changes of characteristics imposed on the signal by the compression-decompression of XM broadcast/receive chain are known, or at least can be measured. The characteristics of MP3 compression are known as well. Some parts of the signal will get lost. There are three ways to cope:

      1) Suck it up and consider it good enough. Or use high-enough bitrate to make the losses not matter; the XM quality itself isn't exactly CD, so 256k MP3 or Ogg variable bitrate stream should be more than enough.

      2) Preprocess the analog signal from XM, adding/removing some input-dependent frequencies for the MP3 algorithm to throw away without showing recompression artefacts. Don't ask me how, this is a question for DSP people.

      3) Tweak the MP3 compression algorithm to use different model for throwing out information deemed unimportant, to compensate for the compression artefacts of the XM step. Again, question for DSP people.

  15. no more howard stern i guess by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 1

    well, i mean, since i've been recording music off of FM RADIO FOR 15+ YEARS, i guess the RIAA will get rid* of regular radios too.

    * they won't do anything

    --
    vodka, straight up, thank you!
    1. Re:no more howard stern i guess by MrDomino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not really about recording music as it is making it incredibly easy to do so; in theory, as long as you can hear the music, you can record and distribute it.

      It's just that having a program automatically grab and tag songs for you is pretty far-removed from manually recording songs (at FM quality, which I'd assume is considerably worse than XM quality) with DJs and what-not talking over them, and then tagging them yourself. Not that I don't find the entire situation pretty foolish, but it's kinda understandable. In a way. To a point.

      Yeah, okay, so it's not, but it's par for the course, at least.

    2. Re:no more howard stern i guess by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 1

      agh ... that should have been * they won't do anything <wink> <wink>

      --
      vodka, straight up, thank you!
  16. Willie Nelson by Zorilla · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Didn't Willie Nelson do a series of commercials for XM a while back about how it allowed him to listen to music freely whenever and wherever he wanted?

    Here's a major setback to that freedom. What would Willie think?

    --

    It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    1. Re:Willie Nelson by Quill345 · · Score: 1
      >Didn't Willie Nelson do a series of commercials for
      >XM a while back about how it allowed him to listen
      >to music freely whenever and wherever he wanted?
      Free Willie? Freedom to listen wherever?
  17. abbreviation madness! by iamdrscience · · Score: 4, Funny

    IMHO the RIAA made XM discontinue the XMPCR ASAP because it didn't have any DRM, IIRC. Now everything's AOK because it's DOA, too bad though, if you want XM'S XMPCR USB thing you SOL.

    1. Re:abbreviation madness! by shigelojoe · · Score: 1

      OIC. KTHX.

    2. Re:abbreviation madness! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      "But sir, if the VP is such a VIP, shouldn't we keep his PC on the QT, 'cause if it leaks to the VC he could end up an MIA and then we'd all be put on the KP ASAP." /Good Morning Vietnam

      Found here, dunno if the sig will change before anyone sees this. I love that quote...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  18. worth it? by solosaint · · Score: 1

    is that even worth it? i mean, songs ripped from xm for 400 bones. come on now... use streamripper if you wanna do that

    1. Re:worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shhh! Don't let just everybody know about streamripper! The RIAA may be reading this.

  19. two words: reverse engineer by KingPunk · · Score: 3, Informative

    i wonder how long it'll take somebody,
    who has the hardware from xm..
    to reverse engineer a better one. and sell the prototype to a competitor or something.
    so that we can once again, continue to be free of restrictions from morons such as the *AA, and now
    most notably the XM-radio service.
    /end rant

    1. Re:two words: reverse engineer by EinarH · · Score: 1
      There are still stores out there with the XM PCR "in stock". If someone want to reverse engineer it/crack it/hack it drop me a mail for the link.

      xmpcr at techemail dot com

      (I'm not buying since they don't ship to Europe)

      --

      Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

    2. Re:two words: reverse engineer by GoRK · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As I said in another post, you can take apart any XM radio, remove the XM module (it's a one-piece SIPP package) add a usb/serial converter and a DAC to it and make your own identical XMPCR device. There is no need to reverse engineer anything at all. The protocol has been documented by people writing software for it. The PC->radio protocol is the same used internally by the microcontrollers in every commercial product out there.

    3. Re:two words: reverse engineer by KingPunk · · Score: 1

      im keeping an eye out.

    4. Re:two words: reverse engineer by KingPunk · · Score: 1

      yeah, i caught that after i had replied to the origional one
      but yeah, its a good idea to re it. i think it makes
      a lot of sense, esp. for those who still
      want that same functionability..
      regaurds,
      KingPunk

    5. Re:two words: reverse engineer by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      Luckily for the RIAA, reverse engineering is illegal.

      OK, strictly it isn't illegal in and of itself, just using it to do anything a copyright holder doesn't like is illegal under the DMCA.

      You are of course, free to reverse engineer if no one objects.

      Just as you have totally unrestricted free speech, as long as no one objects.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    6. Re:two words: reverse engineer by KingPunk · · Score: 1

      just because its illegal, doesn't mean it should be.
      point being, its a damn shame that we're having to go through with the big corporate companies
      strongarming the little man. its horrible.. and to think, they got big, because of us.
      i remember reading that back in the day, reccord companies would throw free concerts,
      do small-community promotion, and so on.. now, since they no longer do that, we result to doing what we know
      to more effectively enjoy our experience. not to mention, try to even retain what rights we actually do have left.

  20. I see a business opportunity by gooman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This could be an opportunity for sirius to get into the game and become actual competition. Sometimes its amazing how a niche product can create a halo over an entire product line.

    --
    "Kittens give Morbo gas!"
  21. In other news, slashdot buys XMPCRs by iamhassi · · Score: 4, Funny

    "In other news, /. editors buy 100,000 XMPCR receivers, publishes story their now worth $400 each and sells them on ebay, retiring as millionaires and outsources /. to India."

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    1. Re:In other news, slashdot buys XMPCRs by tylernt · · Score: 1

      "It comes in PINTS?! - ROTK"

      How embarrasing. Your sig quote is from FOTR, not ROTK. Oops!

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    2. Re:In other news, slashdot buys XMPCRs by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny
      outsources /. to India.

      Finally! An improvement in grammar and spelling in the "editor's comments".

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  22. Already on Hatch's Hit List by The+Importance+of · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It looks like they pulled the hardware because of the presumed potential for piracy and they might not have had any legal remedies against. However, if the INDUCE Act had been in force, there would have been a law they could have used to outlaw the software. See, Hatch's Hit List #30 - XM Radio to MP3.

    1. Re:Already on Hatch's Hit List by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, try again. The maker of the software is Canadian and cannot be persecuted^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hprosecuted under the Induce Act (unless he travelled to the US and I am willing to bet the RIAA would have him flag by US customs to allow him to enter the US but as soon as he stepped onto US soil arrest him).

  23. Grrrr.... by al701 · · Score: 1

    I was finally going to jump on and pay the monthly fee and the whole bit. This was the first device that was really going to work in my whole digital audio lifestyle. I wrote them a letter via the contact page off their site. I know it will not do much, but maybe if everyone does it, we can get it back. Heck even if it had DRM protection or something, I would have still been happy. FairPlay would have worked. :) Oh wait thats been hacked. hmmmm

    1. Re:Grrrr.... by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      Bbbrrrwoong! FairPlay has not been "hacked" if you count using your private key to decrypt to an unencrypted song.

      I consider the Apple Guy to be deficient as to not let you decrypt songs.

      Break the encryption, and Ill be impressed.

      --
    2. Re:Grrrr.... by al701 · · Score: 1

      I was using the term "hacked" quite loosely.

  24. Web-based coming by SparklingClearWit · · Score: 5, Informative

    More than likely, they'll announce that existing subscribers will be able to listen to XM via Windows Media Player/Real Player/etc., as Sirius does. Right now, you need another piece of hardware, and another XM subscription.

    With my Sirius username/password, I can listen to the music channels on my home PC, and the actual receiver is in my pickup. No comedy or sports, but no extra fee, either. My wife can use it simultaneously, as well.

    No, I don't work for Sirius. Honest. I like both XM and Sirius - just speculating on reason ATM.

    1. Re:Web-based coming by prawnpie · · Score: 1

      Ok, but that still leaves people out in the country-side or who are using their homebrew music systems in their cars shit out of luck... Either way information wants to be free and with all the waveform fingerprinting going on it'll be really hard to keep people from saving and cataloging the music.

    2. Re:Web-based coming by SparklingClearWit · · Score: 1

      Not disputing that at all, nor am I against time-shifting/cataloging/organizing. Just saying what I think is likely, based on the heavily competitive satellite radio market.

    3. Re:Web-based coming by prawnpie · · Score: 1

      Not trying to be contrary - I agree that they'll move to web-based distribution, just trying to say it's a bummer that they're alienating part of the market that probably said hallelujah when the computer card came out.

    4. Re:Web-based coming by SparklingClearWit · · Score: 1

      True. I wouldn't be surprised, though, to see something like StreamRipper surface to grab the XM/Sirius streams as they come down... :)

    5. Re:Web-based coming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately those things will break the DMCA in many ways, as Streamripper found out!

    6. Re:Web-based coming by TrentTheThief · · Score: 1

      The thing about XMPCR, you see, is that is doesn't access the network at all. That's the reason people bought them. Not everyone want to stream. Not everyone _can_ stream.

      If you're stuck on a corporate network that's stingy with bandwidth or who disables streaming protocols, or if you don't have a broadband connection at home or only own an older PC that isn't up to processing a stream and letting you do anything useful, XMPCR brought a hell of a lot to the table.

      Not everyone wants to save the music, some of us who are stuck in a highrise simply wanted to listen to something besides a bad FM signal from a crap clear channel clone.

  25. Just got my order in for one... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 4, Funny
    I ordered mine on Thursday from xm-radio-satellite.com (they're out of stock now like everyone else), and it shipped out Friday. Supposedly mid-transit right now up to NYC from Florida, scheduled UPS delivery date Wednesday.


    Now if only I could pick stocks that quintupled in value in 5 days....

    1. Re:Just got my order in for one... by duggie · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hi
      I'm the UPS driver that is going to deliver your package, but unfortunately we lost your name and address in our database. Could you give them to me again so that we make sure you don^H^H^H^H so that you get your package delivered.
      Thanks
      UPS Delivery Guy

  26. Going for $400? I think not. by smart.id · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just because the price is set at $400 doesn't mean they are going for that price. They will most likely not sell for such high of a price. In fact, not a single bid has been placed on the given auction as of yet. So while the seller may be asking for $400, if no one is willing to pay that, he might as well sell it for a billion dollars.

    --
    blog & fiction: jd87
  27. Still availible here... by keeleysam · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    Nothing for you to see here, Please move along.
    1. Re:Still availible here... by vistic · · Score: 2, Informative

      you didn't try clicking the buy button did you?

      they're not available anywhere.

    2. Re:Still availible here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you reg first you can order. I just ordered one.. in stock is low though..

    3. Re:Still availible here... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      No you can't, I'm registered and have ordered from there before (I bought an XMPCR a few days ago from their site), and I can't get one now either - try it yourself, the BUY button won't let you put it in your shopping cart anymore.

    4. Re:Still availible here... by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      Then hack the local javascript blocking such. Make em think that its a normal transaction.

      --
    5. Re:Still availible here... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can't, it's a server side validation of the form submit values that causes the page to return with the Javascript alert spliced in at the end.

    6. Re:Still availible here... by netmask · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even if you could bypass it.. Do you think submitting an order for a product that is out of stock is going to get you anywhere?

      Maybe they'll just pull a few PCR's out of their behinds?

      Better get a discount on those.

  28. Nothing to see here by GrimCracker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The canceling of the PCR is more likely related to the rumored inclusion of a USB port on the soon to be released Skyfi 2. They're not going to shout from the rooftops that they're discontinuing it any more than they advertised the demise of the Roady in favor of the Roady 2. There is no conspiracy here.

    1. Re:Nothing to see here by GoRK · · Score: 1

      I'm glad to hear this! Things were looking down there. Hopefully, it will be more than just a rumor. The original XMPCR while minimalistic, inexpensive, and straight-to-the-point, had a significatn setback for control software -- the interface was stuck at 9600 bps! It takes over 20 seconds to grab the list of stations and what's playing. This slow refresh time is quite a hindrance when the radio internally is updating it much faster..

    2. Re:Nothing to see here by black+mariah · · Score: 1

      Facts from someone that actuallys knows what they're talking about? That dog won't hunt, dude. Promptly hand in your Slashdot ID card and vacate the premises.

      Thank you,
      Management

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    3. Re:Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was talking to an XM rep over 6 months ago, and he recommended not getting the PCR because they were coming out with a SkyFi base that included USB.

  29. Dont Worry Some one else will make it by hckrdave · · Score: 0, Troll

    if there selling for $400 on ebay i find a way to turn 20 cents worth of cable into $400!

    1. Re:Dont Worry Some one else will make it by hckrdave · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      again... posting stoned = screw ups =\

    2. Re:Dont Worry Some one else will make it by hckrdave · · Score: 0

      HOW IS THIS A TROLL!? :-(

  30. It may be a good time to by betanerd · · Score: 0, Redundant
    --
    Insert sig here (slashdot) Insert cig here (Lewinsky)
  31. X.M.P.C.R.? by deft · · Score: 1

    ahh, got it.

    XM Personal Computer Recorder

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
  32. Flash: RIAA shoots own foot by H_Fisher · · Score: 4, Insightful
    If the RIAA *is* behind this, it seems awfully damned counterproductive.

    Think about it. So-called "time shifting" is (for the moment) legal. They never minded people taping things off the radio. They're mad as hell about people not paying for their music - but radio airplay makes money for them through compulsory fees, not to mention publicity (at least in theory, IANA broadcaster...)

    Enter Sirius / XM; the industry still gets money and still gets publicity (perhaps more than before; with all the niche stations and lack of commercials & inane banter, I've been tempted to subscribe...) And more people are willing to PAY FOR MUSIC because of this service - just not the $18 or so they want 'em to pay.

    So if the RIAA is behind the move to get rid of the XMPCR, what do they expect? That a lot of the people who subscribe will continue to pay for XM, AND pay for a copy of the CD, AND pay another couple of bucks for a "legal" version for their portable player once it becomes illegal or impossible to rip it yourself ... And of course piracy is a perfect excuse^H^H^H^Hplanation for why XM will lose subscribers from this.

    1. Re:Flash: RIAA shoots own foot by MedHead · · Score: 1
      They never minded people taping things off the radio

      Actually, if I recall correctly, this was an issue, same with VCRs. Radio stations are required to pay a fee for the public transmission of the music.

    2. Re:Flash: RIAA shoots own foot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't mind the timeshifting because there is a royality payment to RIAA for each blank cassette sold. Ditto for blank VHS tapes and the movie industry.

    3. Re:Flash: RIAA shoots own foot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on your country.

    4. Re:Flash: RIAA shoots own foot by Technician · · Score: 1

      So if the RIAA is behind the move to get rid of the XMPCR, what do they expect?

      I for one was considering this once I heard about the radio and software. Wow, the ablity to create a custom playlist and leave the junk out.

      Oh well, it was an interesting concept.

      In a free market, manufactures try to meet the consumers needs.

      In a monopoly, the most money is extracted for the least service.

      Thank goodness the commercial music isn't a required neccessity like food, water, and shelter.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  33. Special gadgets not necessary? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "We are very concerned about a variety of technologies that essentially transform performances into music libraries," RIAA spokesman Steve Marks said.

    That might be any PC. If anyone were to invent an algorithm that can do an "analog checksum" on a sound file (assuming it hasn't been invented already), then all of this functionality would be available to anybody with a computer and a sound card.

    Software could continuously record the audio source, cross reference checksums against an online database akin to the freedb CD database, and catalog and save whatever is new. Hook it to an FM radio, Music Choice on digital cable, Muzak, XM, whatever, and you could start accumulating your very own digital music library.

    1. Re:Special gadgets not necessary? by Nonesuch · · Score: 1
      If anyone were to invent an algorithm that can do an "analog checksum" on a sound file (assuming it hasn't been invented already), then all of this functionality would be available to anybody with a computer and a sound card.
      Royal Philips Electronics developed "Acoustic fingerprinting" technology, and it's already being used to limit file sharing: http://slashdot.org/articles/01/04/20/1727220.shtm l

      Software could continuously record the audio source, cross reference checksums against an online database akin to the freedb CD database, and catalog and save whatever is new.
      The difficulty would be in determining what sequence of audio is a legitimate, complete, and interesting new song, and what is Howard Stern literally taking a crap on the radio.
    2. Re:Special gadgets not necessary? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      Once you've identified a song, the database could tell you what the beginning and end should sound like, and the program could automatically toss songs that get hosed by the DJ.

      There's probably a lot of stations where you'd never get a clean song, but I listen to a couple stations that probably play at least half of the songs without stepping on them. Of course, the best bet would be one of the interruption-free subscription music sources.

    3. Re:Special gadgets not necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well there already is software that can tag/label your MP3s by identifying them through an "analog checksum." Check out MusicBrainz, which I found to have pretty good accuracy but the service is always so bogged down you can barely try it out.

      Maybe if enough people donated to buy them hardware it might actually be useable, but it's kind of a catch 22 cause you can't really test it.

      -- paper

  34. MOD PARENT DOWN! by oldosadmin · · Score: 0

    Several posts have already shown that one did sell on Buy it now for $399

    --
    Jay | http://oldos.org
  35. Thank goodness for big business by atrizzah · · Score: 1

    It's a good thing big business loves us and protects us squashing innovation at every turn

  36. This is getting ridiculous by Stevyn · · Score: 1

    The RIAA's goal is to make money. They keep wasting their time going after individuals who might be making digital recordings off "their" music. They should act like Microsoft does to piracy:

    If it spreads the music and generates popularity, it's all good.

    The RIAA, well just a bunch of companies, is going to keep making money. They should accept the fact people want to make music listening easier. As I type this, I'm listening to an album I bought but ripped to my hard drive because it's easier to manage music on my computer. It's completely legitimate and legal.

    I understand their panic that they'll suddenly lose their revenue stream, but people want ease and they're willing to pay for it.

    Nobody is going to start copying their music of XM radio when a slightly more expensive but massively easier alternative exists. I've said it before, and I'll say it again...they should have created iTunes.

    1. Re:This is getting ridiculous by MedHead · · Score: 1
      The RIAA's goal is to make money. They keep wasting their time going after individuals who might be making digital recordings off "their" music. They should act like Microsoft does to piracy:

      If it spreads the music and generates popularity, it's all good.

      So the authorization requirement for Windows XP wasn't an attempt to stop piracy? They may not be as zealous as the RIAA, but they certainly don't appreciate piracy.

      Nobody is going to start copying their music of XM radio when a slightly more expensive but massively easier alternative exists. I've said it before, and I'll say it again...they should have created iTunes.

      Ironically, before iTunes was around, many people claimed that there was a need for a cheap music purchasing option, say around a dollar a song. These folks claimed piracy would dramatically drop once this was put into effect.

      Once iTunes was released, these folks changed their tune, claiming that now the reason they downloaded music was because of the DRM in iTunes. I guess they were stupid enough to believe there was a chance that the RIAA would start handing out MP3 or WAV files for a dollar - while still pretending to believe that people wouldn't distribute the music. I dunno.

  37. What's the difference? by ayersrj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can use the tape recorder in your portable to tape music off of the airwaves. I don't see Sony rushing to rip those suckers out. What's the difference here?

    1. Re:What's the difference? by cfuse · · Score: 1
      I don't see Sony rushing to rip those suckers out. What's the difference here?

      The difference is that Sony knows how to do business, and hasn't forgotten who it's customers are. Pity the RIAA can't say the same.

    2. Re:What's the difference? by BCW2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everything you have heard the RIAA say about P2P and burning your own CD's is not new. In about 1970 or '71 they were saying the exact same thing, about cassette recorders. "It will kill the music industry". I swear that some of that crap is an exact quote from back then. Of course the quality of songs taped from the radio sucked, so it was never the threat they claimed. The difference today is the quality, it's much closer to store bought. Plus you can mix your own songs/artists however you want. We called those "party tapes" and when done on high end stero systems, from albums, they did sound good.

      The big deal is that with P2P, you don't have to buy or borrow a copy of the RIAA's "source" like we did to make tapes. They didn't like the borrow part either.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
    3. Re:What's the difference? by shark72 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The tipping point is the signal quality.

      It's why DATs and audio CD-R recorders have (legally mandated) serial copy management systems, and analog cassette recorders do not.

      You're not the first person to make the inference between low-fi and hi-fi recording -- heck, some people even compare P2P to analog radio and wonder out loud what the difference is.

      Sometimes, a few orders of magnitude of audio precision make all the difference in the world. It's those orders of magnitude of precision that were the driving force behind digital recording systems replacing analog recording systems, and for the popularity of digital radio systems in the past few years. That's the key difference.

      If you're still not sure what I mean, find a friend who has an XM or a (later generation) Sirius box, and compare the quality to FM. You'll likely be blown away.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
    4. Re:What's the difference? by MedHead · · Score: 1
      Wait... because the RIAA doesn't allow people to download music without paying for it, they're ignoring their customers? I would think stopping users from acquiring their goods without paying for the items would be a definition of a potential customer!

      I really tire of the crusade against the RIAA that Slashdotters so enjoy. I won't rant on about it, since this really isn't the place for it, but really. The RIAA may be overzealous, but they are not in the wrong for pursuing those who infringe copyright. Those who infringe may not like it. Big deal. People don't like getting caught for speeding on the highway, either. Are we going to side with the speeders because the posted speed is oppressive?

    5. Re:What's the difference? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Er... Sony's a member of the RIAA. MPAA too.

    6. Re:What's the difference? by cfuse · · Score: 1
      Wait... because the RIAA doesn't allow people to download music without paying for it, they're ignoring their customers?

      Yep, exactly. Because that's what their customers are doing, and the RIAA just won't wake up and smell the coffee. The cat is out of the bag and it's time the RIAA did something constructive about it. The old way of doing business is going to get harder and the RIAA is doing it's members (and their customers) no favours by being obstructive about it.

      The RIAA fucks over everyone. Why should I pay the RIAA for something that they didn't make just so some record exec can get richer whilst the artist starves. The RIAA (and the whole of the recording industry's) business practices stink worse than a day old fish. Why can't I give my money *directly* to the artist? It's not like the technology to do such a transaction doesn't exist.

      The RIAA may be overzealous, but they are not in the wrong for pursuing those who infringe copyright.

      Quite right. They *are* however in the wrong for buying votes to make copyright infringement a felony, they are in the wrong for introducing biased propaganda into school curriculums, they are in the wrong for robbing the artists and the customers, they are in the wrong for making a monoculture of music. These are the people that have screwed over so many artists, I hate the RIAA for their modern day slavery. Their behaviour is vile.

    7. Re:What's the difference? by cfuse · · Score: 1
      Er... Sony's a member of the RIAA. MPAA too.

      I feel like someone has just taken a giant pin to my cortex, and now all the air is rushing out.

      Sony is smart, they get the RIAA, MPAA to do their dirty work whilst producing all the recording devices at the coalface.

    8. Re:What's the difference? by shark72 · · Score: 1

      "Why should I pay the RIAA for something that they didn't make just so some record exec can get richer whilst the artist starves."

      A typical CD represents the efforts of dozens of people. All of them are like you in me in that they expect to be paid for the job they do. While it makes piracy less morally ambiguous if you imagine the average record company to be some coke-snorting executive, it doesn't reflect the reality of the music industry.

      "Why can't I give my money *directly* to the artist? It's not like the technology to do such a transaction doesn't exist. "

      You are very correct. That decision is up to the artist. Expressed in broad strokes, artists can choose two routes:

      1. Come up with the funds to record and produce their music, including studio rental time or building their own studio. Then, set up their own web site and/or work with a third party that specializes in transcoding into the formats used by iTMS and the other music services. Do their best to promote their own music, or pay somebody to provide expertise and assistance in advertising and promotion. Or...
      2. Get a recording contract (if they're lucky). The record company will pay for all the expenses of recording, engineering, producing, selling, marketing and distributing their music. In exchange for this, they get the exclusive rights to distribute the recordings.

      The benefit of the first approach is that although the artist needs to pay for everything up front, they get to keep more of the money earned from sales. But it's back-breaking work that's not for the faint of heart.

      The benefit of the second approach is that the record company provides the cash that's necessary, and takes all of the risk -- if the music does not sell, then the artist is not out thousands or tens of thousands of dollars. The tradeoff is that the artist doesn't start to make serious money until the costs have been recouped.

      There is, of course, no shortage of artists who take the former route. You'll find them playing at your local coffee house or small venue. You'll find them on Magnatunes or other "open source" labels. You'll find them on sites like garageband.com. You asked why you can't pay artists directly -- if you can't find artists who want to sell their music directly, you're just not looking hard enough.

      If you're hoping for an arrangement where a record company invests tens or hundreds of thousands of their own money into producing a CD, and then allows you to give money directly to the artist with none going to the record company to recoup their costs, it will be hard to find -- the economics just don't make sense. To construct an analogy closer to Slashdotters' experience... if you had a great idea for a software product but you needed to find investment money to get it out the door, any investor you'd talk to would require a piece of the action. If you told them that you'd like to take their money but then keep the sales income to yourself, you would not get very far in the negotiations. Record companies and strategic investors have a few thing in common: they're not philanthropists, and they're not rich uncles. Just like you and me, if they don't make money, they won't be around for very long.

      --
      Sitting in my day care, the art is decopainted.
  38. WWWD by vwjeff · · Score: 2, Funny

    What Would Willie Do?

    Willie would stop paying the bill. He would also forget to pay his income taxes. Oh wait...

    1. Re:WWWD by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes, Sam Kinison jokes!

      "It's taxes, brother, not Texans!"

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  39. CarPC Project by LinuxWhore · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Damn. I was really hoping these would stick around. It would have been a great addition to my aspiring Car PC project. Time-shifting talk radio over XM would have been neat.

    As far as I was concerned, devices like this were one the major reasons to subscribe to XM instead of Sirius.

    --

    I am MuchTall
  40. closed source by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    If the XM broadcasts weren't in a proprietary encoding, we might be able to make our own players for their data format. Is it even possible to tune in their dedicated frequency signals on a 3rd party radio, controllable by a PC? The asymmetry between the dollars they paid for their right of way through public (and private) airspace, while standing on the publicly funded US satellite program, and the actual public benefit from their operations, seems extreme.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  41. MOD PARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    encourages censorship of legimate thought and ideas.

  42. P2P by Orange+Apple · · Score: 0

    Now that thats gone how many people will revert to LimeWire or other P2P applications? The RIAA just did a stupid thing... But hell, there always doing stupid things.

    --
    Eat My Bad Karma...
  43. Sirius! by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1

    With Sirius, you get INCLUDED with your service streaming audio of all their programming to your PC. It's a simple matter to time-shift this music with .wav drivers.

  44. Hell w/ XMPCR -- I want the silver XM car! by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 5, Funny

    Screw this XMPCR crap. I want that little silver car that the XM office geek drives into his high-rise office building. Who needs a chic, cheap computer-based XM receiver when you can friggin' drive your cool little car right up to your cubicle?

    Did I mention that NO ONE from this guy's office bitched about him driving that little car through the hall and cutting them off at the elevator?

    What about the hot chick in the left of the elevator that's eyeing his little silver car? Schwing! With the XMPCR, chicks'll just give you looks like, "That's gadget geek from the mail room or accounting, right? So sad -- look how he cradles his laptop and that weird mouse." No -- she'd be asking for a lift down to cubicle area 37 on the 11th floor -- chauffeur style.

    And damn -- talk about being able to take a break. You don't have to walk the three blocks at 12:30pm for your half hour lunch/nap in the car just to listen to the XM radio and justify the cost of the service. And remember -- it'd be THAT radio you'd be carrying those three blocks along with a laptop if you had the XMPCR. Hell no! With the silver XM car, you'd just walk out of your cubicle, open up the cooler in the trunk, grab your ham sandwich and chips, and lay down in the back seat.

    Hell -- if your boss DOES bitch about you blocking the aisles betweens cubes 45 and 46, you can just "accidentally" back over him and drag his body under your cubicle desk before anyone notices. The XM radio in the car can be turned up to drown out his dying scream. And, if he's still alive, you can beat him over the head with that XM jukebox that they show in the commercial -- you know you'd have one if you had the cool XM car!

    If you had that piddly XMPCR and your boss bitched about the music, what would you do? Strangle him with the USB cord? Hell no. He may be your lame ass boss, but he does get to the company gym for the executives while you ride on the shitty subway home with your XMPCR that gets looks from thieves on the train. What exercise have you had while he's been at the gym, eh? He's take that USB cord and strangle YOUR ass!

    Yeah -- screw that overpriced XMPCR -- I want the silver XM car!

    IronChefMorimoto

    1. Re:Hell w/ XMPCR -- I want the silver XM car! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      red car.

    2. Re:Hell w/ XMPCR -- I want the silver XM car! by MedHead · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the point of the commercial. The point was not that one could drive the car up to your cubicle, it was that you could use one transceiver in all your different XM radio peripherals (a very small home unit, boombox, and car unit). I understand you were being sarcastic, but I guess others didn't catch on, since you're now modified "Insightful". I fail to see how a poor representation of a commercial could be considered insightful.

    3. Re:Hell w/ XMPCR -- I want the silver XM car! by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Huh...?

      Oh, you're talking about a commercial! I remember those things! Y'see, satellite radio has spoiled me rotten and I'm no longer able to tolerate advertisements the way I used to. Because of that I hardly watch any television any more.

      Did you know that, between my reliance on satellite radio and the ol' Adblock extension to FF, I have yet to see a single presitential campaign advertisement? I keep on seeing mention of some controversial commercials in the news, but that's the only way I know they exist.

    4. Re:Hell w/ XMPCR -- I want the silver XM car! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally off topic, but I think it also has to do where you live. Here in Texas, I have yet to see any of those commercials. The only way I know they exsist is because CNN plays them during the news broadcast. I like how they put the commercial inside a little TV. Maybe thats so we know that we arent watching a 'real commercial' at that moment.

    5. Re:Hell w/ XMPCR -- I want the silver XM car! by Sinical · · Score: 1

      It's red.

    6. Re:Hell w/ XMPCR -- I want the silver XM car! by newman_berman · · Score: 1

      Hey, I saw a red car in the add on my TV. A red Alfa Romeo. Early 70's. I had a '74 red Alfa. Loved it!! Then I got into that customized van madness.....

    7. Re:Hell w/ XMPCR -- I want the silver XM car! by Cornelius+the+Great · · Score: 1

      "I think you missed the point of the commercial."

      I think you missed the point of the parent's post.

      --
      Sigs are for losers
  45. XM PCR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have one (XMPCR), and I don't intend on selling it.

    On a side note, I also work at and attend Purdue University. One of the dining courts is getting Sirius satellite radio. It's going to be pretty nice. They didn't even install an AM/FM tuner when they built the building.

  46. how about this by austad · · Score: 1

    Why doesn't anyone make a usb/serial -> DIN adapter for receivers? It can't be that hard, and would allow one to use any receiver on their computers.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    1. Re:how about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      simple, most all recievers have an audio line out plug, just run audio out from XM reciever to audio in on the sound card on your computer, then use your favorite software to record, you may have to adjust volume levels to get the best sound quality...

  47. Know the code... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before: 52 50 51 E8 C4 36 04 00 66 3D 02 00
    After: 52 50 51 B8 01 00 0B C0 66 3D 02 00

  48. Awww by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    Gee, I guess my interest in XM just got reduced. The shows which I like are on the air when I have to be moving around and can't sit by a radio, so I was going to listen to them through an MP3 player.

    1. Re:Awww by jotok · · Score: 1

      I don't see why they couldn't just offer webcasts of shows after they've aired. Quite a few webradio sites do it (e.g. DNA Lounge, BBC).

      One of the great things about XM is that they listen to their customers (at least so far as programming goes). If enough people want a product like this then they'll probably produce one again.

  49. Such as the *AA? by Ghostgate · · Score: 2, Funny
    from morons such as the *AA

    Come on now. The RIAA and MPAA sure, but what's the AAA ever done to you? They've always helped me out if my car battery died or if I had a flat tire!

    1. Re:Such as the *AA? by KingPunk · · Score: 1

      haha. true this. the aaa isnt my problem.
      next time, i guess i'll have to see to it,
      that i use proper variables. caught red handed. ;)

    2. Re:Such as the *AA? by pyrrhonist · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The RIAA and MPAA sure, but what's the AAA ever done to you?

      Not to mention AA, since the grandparent used a, "*".

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    3. Re:Such as the *AA? by KingPunk · · Score: 1

      ok, that is it.
      no more cute barney underwear for you for xmas anymore, smartass ;)

    4. Re:Such as the *AA? by aminorex · · Score: 1

      I think he just misspelled ..AA.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  50. Inevitable by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    They may be able to quiet XM for now, but the same automated recording and tagging can be done with the new "HD Radio" standards that are getting pushed out the door. A closed-loop business like satellite radio is one thing, but broadcasters and radio manufacturers tend to be two different people when it comes to FM.

    Of course, I give it a week before the RIAA strong-arms broadcasters to essentially break the tagging features, but then you'll have some unhappy hardware manufacturers...

  51. Isn't this all conjecture? by wheresmysocks · · Score: 1

    I mean, that's great that Ryan Morris, owner of XMfan.com and one of those selling PCRs on eBay, says they're discontinued. But, why would XM possibly do that?

    There's obviously a demand now. They haven't taken the site down. I'm not sold on the idea that this is the end of the product line. Maybe there's something similar coming out, maybe they just need to manufacture some more.

    TimeTrax certainly was not the first (or at the least, not the only) software to offer XM to MP3 ripping with the PCR.

    1. Re:Isn't this all conjecture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree and of course hope that you are correct. From the XMPCR website you linked to, there are a few different outlets for purchasing this hardware.

      As you can see from :
      http://www.xm-radio-satellite.com/index.asp?Pag eAc tion=VIEWPROD&ProdID=268

      There are 10 in stock right now @ $60

  52. Cheaper solution... by rarose · · Score: 1

    Just duplicate the PC boards in the XMPCR and sell them complete without the XM Module. Once all the cars with built-in XM radios start hitting the junkyards, you'll see the price of used car radios (with their XM module inside) plummet.

    And there's only 12 or so big fat easy-to-solder pins on the module.

    --
    --Rob
  53. Do it for free!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Buy a DVB card for your computer. Download some audio ripping software for the satellite card http://audiorip.dvbnetwork.com/
    If you want some video decoding then download software for descrambling http://audiorip.dvbnetwork.com/.

    Point your satellite dish at 110, 119 or 91 degress west. You can watch video and audio.
    YOu can also record audio digitally from the satellite. The dish network satellite also carries the Sirius channels. THe audiorip software will name tag the songs and cut them too. It will also put them in folders. And you can also record multiple radio channels at the same time.

  54. They will never win. Period. by l8apex · · Score: 1

    All this does is piss the hacker/engineer off and make them try even harder.

    For example, I can see someone taking one of their cheap receivers, disassembling it, decoding the display hardware and feeding that into a serial port. That was just one idea that took zero effort to think up!

    If their competitors encourage the PC-satellite radio integration, they will hurt.

    1. Re:They will never win. Period. by MedHead · · Score: 1
      So because copyright infringement occurs, the RIAA should just give up? Silence very often alludes to assent, which is definitely not the RIAA's position.

      Besides that, we should not delude ourselves into believing that the copying of work or goods exists because of organizations like the RIAA. People are lazy, and are such freeloaders that they have come to expect things given to them, rather than working for the goods. Before media for copying was invented, there was no easy way to copy sounds and motion. People had to pay for the work.

    2. Re:They will never win. Period. by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1

      I think you're a troll, but whatever. Time shifting (recording a program for later listening) is LEGAL and protected by FAIR USE. So what is the RIAA's stance again? It's within the bounds of copyright.

      --
      You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  55. Here is how to do it for free. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Buy a DVB card for your computer. Download some audio ripping software for the satellite card http://audiorip.dvbnetwork.com/
    If you want some video decoding then download software for descrambling http://audiorip.dvbnetwork.com/.

    Point your satellite dish at 110, 119 or 91 degress west. You can watch video and audio.
    YOu can also record audio digitally from the satellite. The dish network satellite also carries the Sirius channels. THe audiorip software will name tag the songs and cut them too. It will also put them in folders. And you can also record multiple radio channels at the same time.

  56. Exhibit A by rarose · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Netpliance and the iOpener

    The original hack required someone to fabricate a hard-drive bracket and cable, plus solder a 40-pin IDE header to the board. Then they tried to stop it and the real fun began.

    Netpliance locked out the BIOS. So people started sharing old BIOS images, then somebody had to open up their unit, pull the flash, reflash it in a programmer, then reassemble.

    Netpliance then started epoxying the BIOS into the socket. So then people wrote a QNX flash program.

    Netpliance then started sending the Cease and Desist letters. Somebody wrote a webpage with an embedded QNX flash applet. No screwdriver required... just point it's built in web-browser at a URL.

    --
    --Rob
  57. Posting at the top.... by FlutterVertigo(gmail · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...so it's available to everyone who doesn't scroll down to read everything.

    Has everyone forgotten the other two members of the triumvirate for finding things geek?
    (eBay, PriceWatch, Froogle).

    As I note in a later message, there are completed eBay auctions in the previous five days or so via Buy It Now! for $29.99, $29.99, $40. That's less than what everyone's discussing.
    PriceWatch has nothing listed - just remember it for future use.
    Froogle, which everyone seems to overlook, seems to have an interesting outlook on XMPCR.

    Just remember:
    ________________________________________
    My Trunk Monkey can beat up your Trunk Monkey.
    http://www.suburbanautogroup.com/ford/trunkmonkey. html

    1. Re:Posting at the top.... by WhiteDragon · · Score: 1

      also, as well as pricewatch, don't forget to check out pricegrabber, it is owned by osdn...

      --
      Did you mount a military-grade, variable-focus MASER on an unlicensed artificial intelligence?
    2. Re:Posting at the top.... by signe · · Score: 1

      Not really. The top of the page is an XM PCR at xmfanstore.com, and I'm not seeing other sellers of the actual hardware on there. If you bothered to read the article, you'd know that XMFanStore said that they ordered a bunch of PCRs from XM back on the 18th, and the order did not get filled and they were told that it was being discontinued.

      There are only a handful of authorized resellers for the PCR. Doesn't mean there aren't other people selling them, but you won't be getting them from XMFanStore.

      -Todd

      --
      "The details of my life are quite inconsequential..."
  58. Conspiracy? by john_smith_45678 · · Score: 1

    Oooohhhh so what are you saying?? The RIAA REALLY is behind this??

  59. yawn ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprise that people didnt get those FM USB radio and digitize/MP3 the song

  60. Ebay technique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If that ebay guy had his starting bid a little (actually much) lower, he'd have easily surpassed his buy now price.

    It makes me physically sick to see his starting bid so close to his buynow. (Okay, i'm weird)

  61. Satellite Radio Superstore by wheresmysocks · · Score: 1

    They've been having a little crisis as to whether or not they have it in stock. Last night it was yes, then it was no. Now they have they have 10, but you can't order them online. *shrugs*

  62. XM is the devil by austad · · Score: 2, Interesting

    XM is 60% owned by ClearChannel anyway. Why would you want to give your money to them?

    Buy a Sirius tuner and suck it up. Sirius plays better music too.

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    1. Re:XM is the devil by xjosh · · Score: 1
      sayeth the poster:

      XM is 60% owned by ClearChannel anyway. Why would you want to give your money to them?

      Wrong. Not anymore.

      http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=XMSR
  63. bad move by ALpaca2500 · · Score: 1

    i read about the timetrax software on boingboing.net 3 weeks ago. i immediately bought an XM PCR from pcconnection.com for $40 (plus shipping). i had been thinking about XM for quite a while, and the only thing holding me back was paying $100+ for just another way to listen to music... but something i can hook up to my PC, and occasionally record stuff from (such as.. the stand up - sit down show on the comedy channel, which i had downloaded some episodes of off of usenet before instead), and which i can take anywhere as long as i take my laptop along, instead of having something tethered to my car without buying all sorts of extra equiptment... this thing seemed really cool when i first heard about it, and after 3 weeks, i continue to think so.

    i'll bet, in the last few weeks, these things have been selling like hot cakes. and XM must have thought... "people seem to like this. LET"S GET RID OF IT!"

    personally, i still download music, i still buy CDs, and i think i'll continue my XM subscription indefinitely, but this seems like a real boneheaded move to me...

  64. Interesting bit in the article... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    "(Satellite) radio stations are in a tough spot between the recording industry, from which they license music, and subscribers, who want maximum flexibility in exchange for their monthly fees."

    I'd be more than willing to pay higher subscription fees for a company that would willingly go to bat against the RIAA instead of caving like this. I suspect I'm not the only one, either.

    1. Re:Interesting bit in the article... by MedHead · · Score: 1

      Yes yes yes, more grandiose promises that you know very well would never be followed through. One, because it costs money - and people claim to be willing to invest, but it's normally just talk. Two, there is no possible legal way for a non-authorized, subscription-based radio company to distribute RIAA/MPAA media without consent from the RIAA or MPAA. As soon as the company would "stick it to the man" and "fight the system" and all the rest of the cliche terms, the stations would begin pulling out of the deal because 1. they were being forced to do so by parent companies or 2. they were being forced to do so by the RIAA/MPAA. If you want to enjoy the media you listen to on the "evil" service providers, you're going to have to put up with the rules they lay down, or you don't get to enjoy the services. We don't have a "right" to music. If the RIAA wants to make music that nobody can listen to, it's their right. If they want to make music that nobody can afford, it's their right. If you want to listen to the music, you have every right to do so, as long as you follow the requirements.

    2. Re:Interesting bit in the article... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "One, because it costs money - and people claim to be willing to invest, but it's normally just talk."

      "Who would pay to subscribe to satellite radio when you can get AM/FM for free?" Satellite radio makes its money from and is succeeding because of customers who are willing to pay more money for a better product. It should be noted that the conflict mentioned in the article doesn't happen with terrestrial broadcasters as the customers are the advertisers, not the listeners. Most cable channels don't even work that way.

      "Two, there is no possible legal way for a non-authorized, subscription-based radio company to distribute RIAA/MPAA media without consent from the RIAA or MPAA."

      The RIAA has no (direct) say in what their royaltee rates are. Those rates are set by Congress (the ones who define copyright to begin with).

      "As soon as the company would "stick it to the man" and "fight the system" and all the rest of the cliche terms, the stations would begin pulling out of the deal"

      What "stations?" We're talking satellite radio here. The service is the "stations." This isn't cable or satellite TV where you have separate medium and media companies, at least not where music is concerned.

      "If the RIAA wants to make music that nobody can listen to, it's their right."

      It certainly seems that way, but in actuality it's their privilege granted to them by Congress. Whether or not the RIAA has Congress in their back pocket is a different matter, but ultimately it's Congress that calls the shots on all copyright matters.

  65. Who isn't kicking themselves... by iammaxus · · Score: 1

    ...for not seeing this coming when that last story was posted. If I had put down 250 and bought 5, I'd i have a cool $1300+ profit for a few hours work... 'Course it wouldn't even come close to making up for the other hundreds of hours wasted on slashdot...

  66. Source Quality by Detritus · · Score: 1
    The quality of the audio broadcast by the typical FM station is terrible, even if the DJ can keep his mouth shut and not talk over the song. This is in large part due to attempts to sound "loud" by using very aggressive audio processing.

    Are the satellite radio services any better?

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Source Quality by BCW2 · · Score: 1

      Since it's supposed to be a digital signal, you would think so. I haven't tried to record anything so don't know for sure.

      --
      Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  67. RIAA not behind it? by skinfitz · · Score: 1

    The RIAA, it should be noted, claims that they weren't "behind the discontinuation of the PCR".

    Bet they are gutted. They could have played with more law suits and everything. Think of all the missed lawyer fees!

  68. I want satellite radio for the car by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    But I want timeshifting. I'm going to be installing a PC in there for navigation and audio. (It's getting so cheap now...) However the radio annoys the hell out of me, if I can have timeshifting it will be worth it.

    When I go to do this I'm going to install whatever is easiest. If I can't get something that will work intelligently with my PC, then I'll just stick with mp3s I guess.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:I want satellite radio for the car by maduro55 · · Score: 0

      timeshifting? I want time travel in my car!

  69. Simple Solution by Lord+Kano · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Now, XMPCR receivers are going for almost $400 on ebay.

    Don't buy one on Ebay.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    1. Re:Simple Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That site doesn't list them in their "recievers" section or via their search page. If you try to buy one from the link you provided it says "Can't add to your shopping cart"

  70. Interesting bit in the article...Digicypher. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ""If the RIAA wants to make music that nobody can listen to, it's their right."

    It certainly seems that way, but in actuality it's their privilege granted to them by Congress. Whether or not the RIAA has Congress in their back pocket is a different matter, but ultimately it's Congress that calls the shots on all copyright matters."

    There's not a "seems". There's an "is" You might want to make a note of scrambled satellite signals which has been going on for over a decade. And copy-right law is comfortable with that as long as it doesn't violate "fair use" laws (as defined by congress. Not wannabe slashdot lawyers)

  71. They will never win. Period-Joan of Bark. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "All this does is piss the hacker/engineer off and make them try even harder."

    Is this the same hacker/engineer whose jobs are being used as fertilizer to grow overseas jobs? The very same who's part of the decimated middle class. "The few. The proud. The out of work geek."
    I guess you guys never heard of picking your battles.

    "For example, I can see someone taking one of their cheap receivers, disassembling it, decoding the display hardware and feeding that into a serial port. That was just one idea that took zero effort to think up! "

    It's nice to know that's all it takes to impliment.

    "If their competitors encourage the PC-satellite radio integration, they will hurt."

    White Knights for sale!

  72. Fucking morons!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Fucking morons!!!!

    This is product has HUGE potential for users.

    Did you know while CNN on it's best day pulls in 2.4 million watchers, Rush Limbaugh PULLS IN OVER 10 MILLION LISTENERS DAILY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Radio still rules in the USA. Why? Because you can listen to the radio when your doing other things. Working out, driving, riding the bus working, programming, whatever. Radio = multitask.

    More and more people carry PDAs. Good pdas have USB. More and more people have Ipods, they could record shows on ipods. More and more people have a computer at work and a cable modem. It's childs play to stream sound to yourself at work given enough easy to use software.

    It's also more active, too. You think when your being talked to, but not when your watching TV!! You do nothing but watch TV when your watching TV.

    FUCKING MORONS!!!!! THIS PRODUCT COULD OF MADE THEM BILLIONS!!!!

    But now they are pulling the plug because they can't fucking control it enough.

    Man these guys are fucking idiots. They deserve to get screwed over by a competator, just because they are techophobe, control freaks from hell.

    What is your fucking desire to control other people overriding your desire to make PROFITS?

  73. Re:Willie Nelson - Stupid! by JiffyJeff · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, Willie Nelson spends a significant amount of time here at his home on Maui. Guess what, XM Radio is not available in Hawaii... So much for freedoms. :)

  74. fillwithcrap@gmail.com by jubitzu · · Score: 0
  75. How is this "rights?" by wshs · · Score: 1

    Might get modded down for this, but I need to know...
    How exactly does a company pulling a product line equate to rights online? You don't have any more right to demand a product from XM than you do to demand Ford to stop making trucks. And what, exactly, does connecting a radio to a computer have to do with rights online?

  76. Cause and Effect? by dschuetz · · Score: 4, Informative

    Everyone's been assuming that this is in response to TimeTrax. People seem to be forgetting that this has been available for some time (along with other, similar software). Also note that the XMPCR was on super-duper clearance in some places ($15 at XMFan.com a few weeks back, though w/out antenna).

    The general buzz on the XM message boards is that XM Radio was planning to discontinue the XMPCR for some time, and it just became evident (clearance sales, retail channels drying up, etc.) right about the same time as the software concerns hit the radar.

    I mean, really -- could a big company like XM really decide to pull a piece of hardware from the market on only a day's notice? (the TimeTrax software and initial rumors of XMPCR being pulled happened on the same day). There's also been talk of a USB port on new cradles (which may or may not have been recently nixed, depending on your paranoia settings).

    And anyway, the XMPCR was never a big seller for them. Only available from online merchants, it was originally a cheap way for someone to get XM (since they didn't need to sell any controls or displays). Now, the prices have come down (my SkiFi with cradle cost $200, a Roady2 with free home cradle is $100), so they don't need the bottom-end as much any longer.

    So, yes, it's possible there was some RIAA pressure, and it's possible XM decided on their own to avoid the RIAA, but if so, that was probably only the last straw -- I would not be surprised if they'd made this decision 6 months ago.

  77. There is no way that XM is dropping this product l by aggie_knight · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Look yall, this has the stench of one big publicity grab. Dig it:

    XM gets the publicity from the time trax thing. Obviously DiaRIAA is pissed and throws in its two cents. But Publicity good.

    Because of Time Trax, the PCR starts selling like hotcakes...stock begins to run out, and the story starts to drop off the radar.

    XM announces that they are discontinuing the PCR. Huge new, people get worried, MORE PUBLICITY!!!! DiaRIAA is happy and excited (though claiming nothing to do with this of course). Stocks of the PCR thing run completely out, demand skyrockets

    2-6 months from now, XM releases new "safe from piracy" (but not really because such a thing doesn't exist) version of the PCR. MORE PUBLICITY!!!! Music lovers are happy because they can use their PCs. Geeks are happy because they can still hack it. DiaRIAA is happy because its "safe from piracy".

    This is a win/win move by XM. They make a band of lawyers happy, look progressive, and get tons of publicity.

  78. Not selling... by Traicovn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a feeling that the reason it was really discontinued was that it just wasn't selling very well. Most people don't need to stream satellite radio to their computer rather then their stereo. Most people are just going to stream audio off their internet if they are at their computer. Sirius, unlike XM also offers a service that allows streaming to a computer over the internet of their streams. My theory is XM is probably planning on launching a similar service.

    --

    [Something witty and intelligent should have appeared here.]
    {Traicovn}
    1. Re:Not selling... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      If USB weren't host based (maybe if everyone used firewire ... ) then you'd be able to hook it up to your stereo's USB jack.

      Yes, many new stereos and receivers have USB jacks that detect (when connected to a computer) as a USB audio device.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  79. Yes, it is complicated. by JBMcB · · Score: 1

    If you are talking about the CD/satellite radio bus, every company has their own standard. Alpine, Clairon, Pioneer, Kenwood, Sony, Becker, Denon, Panasonic, Audiovox, Delphi, Visteon, they all use their own signalling and connectors, not to mention the in-car busses such as MOST and J1850. Unless you sign up for a developer agreement with them, you don't get the specs. They probably won't like you connecting it to your computer, especially with the XM news. This whole endeavour would be pricey.

    That being said, Soundgate specializes in reverse engineering these protocols and building adapters for them. Unfortunatly they usually go from one standard to another, installing an aftermarket CD changer in your Volkswagon Beetle, for instance.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
  80. What's next, RDS? by Fitch · · Score: 1
    Seriously, they're carrying on about compressing a lossy stream with lossy compression. What's next? When RDS equipped USB radios become available will the RIAA be all over those as well? Give me a fscking break!

    Why won't someone rain some reality on the RIAA before we're all forced to have DRM controls implanted on our auditory nerves. Oooh, there's a market niche for M$ to investigate....

  81. Marketing Ploy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pull the product from the market, only to the after-market drive the price up. Then BAMM, it's re-introduced with the newer after-market price, which will no doubtedly be higher than the initial introductory price.

    P.S. I want my DreamCast BroadBand Adapter!!!

  82. Guess I dodged a bullet by mwood · · Score: 1

    XM came and went and I never spent a dime on it.

    1. Re:Guess I dodged a bullet by accessdeniednsp · · Score: 2

      I guess I should turn off my Roady2 now since I'm apparently listening to phantom streams. Dang. And I was just starting to like it too. Damn you, mwood!!!

  83. Can you say BS? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    While they may not have been *directly* involved with the product being killed, i bet you that the fear of lawsuits played into this..

    Cant have those evil general purpose PC's receive media content.

    Don't be surprised if the MPAA goes after TV cards eventually and 'politely suggests' they either pull them or get some sort of DRM installed ...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  84. DirecTv has Music by theManInTheYellowHat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And with MythTv I am hoping that I can grab the music (that much is trivial) and somehow get the text descriptions that come up with the song.

    This has been available for quite a while so I don't understand all the fuss overthe leagal speculations. I bet it was a simple "these things are not selling like hotcakes and the support team costs us a bundle" rpoblem.

  85. XM did NOT pull PCR by normgregory · · Score: 1

    Pretty sloppy reporting. XM's PC interface still available. xmradio.com/xmpcr/ I bought a couple yesterday.

    1. Re:XM did NOT pull PCR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... you're wrong- Though the online partners list the XM PCR on their sites, every site has been sold out for days.

      Who did you buy "a couple" from yesterday?

    2. Re:XM did NOT pull PCR by normgregory · · Score: 1

      xm-radio-satellite.com . . . and I got my two XM PCR two hours ago. On one is pumping out D12 on my lap top as I type.

  86. True. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

    I can say from experience that no one in radio gives a damn about who might be recording their broadcasts. When you take into account FM distortion, and tape distortion, your copy is going to sound like crap anyway. Also, you have to sit there and do it; they know that most people are too lazy to do that.

    It's really just about throwing in more ads, more self promotion, and more FCC required station IDs. They spend hours teaching you to do that, as a DJ, and they consider you to be really GOOD at it when you can talk all the way up to the first word of the song. How much does that suck?

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  87. I doubt its the recording... by Nostafa · · Score: 1

    Bottom line is I tried to get one of these about in january. No one stocked them. I scoured the web and again no one had them. I called XM themselves and they gave me 3 vendors who didnt even have them in catalog of items to order.

    They probably pulled the line cause it wasnt selling well. They didnt market it well. Unfortunatly if theres no marketing for a product it dies.

    Oh well, now I have an XM portable radio sitting on top of my computer and it works fine for my need.

  88. Psion Wavefinder by ksattic · · Score: 1

    I bought a Psion Wavefinder for 40 UKP a couple of years ago (about 70 USD at the exchange rate then). Most streams are 128kbps mp2s, which for all intents and purposes sound like mp3s to your average listener. You can record the streams using free software directly to an mp2 file, which you can play in Winamp et al. Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB) in Europe also carries additional information with the raw stream, including artist and track title. DAB is free and broadcast via regular antennas, so you can switch your DAB radio on indoors and enjoy. There are around 20-30 decent stations to listen to.

    I now live in the USA. I recently bought an XM tuner for my car, 150 USD plus 50 USD for the antenna, plus 10 USD per month for subscription. I was initially disappointed with the sound quality, and after doing some research, found nearly all channels to be less than 64kbps in a format similar to AAC (called CT-aacPlus - http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/lofiversion/in dex.php/t10492.html). The low bitrate means that a lot of the higher frequencies are severely cut, and the stereo imaging is poor. The clarity of a clean FM broadcast is far superior. I felt I was misled by sales talk that claimed "CD quality". It is not even close to cassette tape quality.

    Anyway, back to my point. If you record an XM stream, it looks like it will be saved as an mp3. This means that the original stream has been re-encoded, losing quality. Re-encoding a 64kbps stream is not pretty, for anyone who has tried it.

    XM has more choice and variety, but is expensive and of questionable quality. Yes, none of the music stations carry ads, but neither do the BBC channels on DAB in the UK, which form the bulk of the channel suite. Also, there is no radio licence in the UK, so it is completely free.

  89. XM PCR, modularity, open and closed ecosystems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is an interesting note on the XM case, from someone at the Berkman Center

    http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/jim/2004/08/31#a805/

  90. Re:Willie Nelson - Stupid! by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

    It should be possible to get a computer with suitably fat uplink in an area with coverage, then stream the data to Maui. I did something similar within a city, when I wanted to listen to a radio from an office without a receiver, and had a computer at home with a FM card. No reason why the same approach shouldn't work over longer distances, at least with suitable stream buffering.

  91. Opie and Anthony the reason? by hime · · Score: 1

    If there's an objection to time-shifting, might it be the widespread file sharing of Opie and Anthony episodes when they were on the air in New York? They're going to charge $2 for the channel O&A are going to be on...

  92. OpenXM vanished! by Eric+Smith · · Score: 1

    Has anyone noticed that the OpenXM project has vanished from SourceForge? Did XM or the RIAA send SourceForge a DMCA notice?

  93. Got some here for only $329.99 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0