What I'd like to see is more extensive than that: If you log in to a website in tab A, then tab B has no access to that (especially cookies) unless tab B is created off tab A (e.g. Open in New Window), or explicitly authorised.
Both are common, but compile to different code.
Do you code to 'a procedure should live on a page'? How about 'a procedure should have a purpose'? Return errors or throw exceptions? Return values or modified arguments? Kitchen sink constructors? Getters & setters or fluent builders?
There's seven variables without stopping to think, dividing coders 128 ways, and I'm sure you could find another dozen or so, taking it to one-in-a-million level. There's no need to obfuscate...
In fact, the sweet corn market where I live has a bubble every damned year - supply peaks in spring/summer and everyone is selling corn cheap then... supply plummets and the price goes up
That's not a bubble, it's a glut; a bubble involves speculation.
Get another email account externally, and configure your email server to send all your outgoing email via that account (using POP3/SMTP authentication). Comcast might already provide an email account/server you can use like that...
I expect that most of those poor famous artists and scientists were interested in amassing sufficient wealth, but were unsuccessful; very few people choose to be poor.
Yes, Facebook is the hosting platform, just as email once existed within computers and didn't travel between them. We don't yet have a Social Media Transport Protocol that allows peering between providers, but one day we will, and Facebook will follow AOL & CompuServe to the big walled garden in the sky. But, IMHO, that day is not in the near future.
If you're a bank or finance company, borrowing and lending on your own account, then yes, customer funds are liabilities. But stockbrokers, lawyers, accountants, et al. keep their customers' funds in a segregated trust account, and Mt.Gox and all the other exchanges should be following this model.
If the returns are really as great as they want you to believe (*), then private industry will be rushing in. The federal seed money has done its job and no more is needed. Voila!
(*) Except that the numbers they've published are gross, and it's the net that counts.
CEOs and VCs are not necessarily the people who have ideas, and if they do, they *already* have the means to express them. I'd rather see 100 respected, talented, peer-voted if necessary, folks on the panel: *true* technocrats, true innovators, not financial folks; people with ideas, sometimes wacky ideas, rather than folks money; the people who turn down a promotion to management because it would take them away from the detailed problem-solving.
So, you only receive a brief flash from the laser, and only have a few rods and cones ablated by the coherent pulse from the laser. That one-second blast has only damaged 0.01% of your vision. Ten years down the line, when half your vision is gone, why would you associate the loss with a laser?
Instead of re-inventing the wheel, use the same mechanism that stock markets use: if the price moves too much in a short period of time, a circuit breaker cuts in and suspends trading. It both stops the market getting skewed and signals that there's a problem.
Some Thinkpads have the QWERTY section full-sized (e.g. my T420). Arrow keys are below right shift, and Home, End, etc., are above Backspace, so it's not perfect, but it's better than most...
Slashdot Mirror
What I'd like to see is more extensive than that: If you log in to a website in tab A, then tab B has no access to that (especially cookies) unless tab B is created off tab A (e.g. Open in New Window), or explicitly authorised.
void foo()
{
String result;
if (...)
result = a;
else (...)
result = b;
else (...)
result = c;
return result;
}
or
void foo()
{
String result;
if (...)
return a;
else (...)
return b;
else (...)
return c;
}
Both are common, but compile to different code. Do you code to 'a procedure should live on a page'? How about 'a procedure should have a purpose'? Return errors or throw exceptions? Return values or modified arguments? Kitchen sink constructors? Getters & setters or fluent builders? There's seven variables without stopping to think, dividing coders 128 ways, and I'm sure you could find another dozen or so, taking it to one-in-a-million level. There's no need to obfuscate...
It's not really capitalism. The government has interfered in the ownership model, not in the price setting for goods and services.
That's not a bubble, it's a glut; a bubble involves speculation.
The Republicans only pwn a single news channel.
FTFY.
Get another email account externally, and configure your email server to send all your outgoing email via that account (using POP3/SMTP authentication). Comcast might already provide an email account/server you can use like that...
I expect that most of those poor famous artists and scientists were interested in amassing sufficient wealth, but were unsuccessful; very few people choose to be poor.
Microsoft are simply copying what Apple does. IBM and others are doing it too.
They're all hoping that they can get the tax law changed so that they can repatriate the profits without paying the current tax rate.
How else do you make the trains run on time...?
You adjust the timetable to match reality. The trains aren't any faster, but the timetable no longer lies.
Yes, Facebook is the hosting platform, just as email once existed within computers and didn't travel between them. We don't yet have a Social Media Transport Protocol that allows peering between providers, but one day we will, and Facebook will follow AOL & CompuServe to the big walled garden in the sky. But, IMHO, that day is not in the near future.
If you're a bank or finance company, borrowing and lending on your own account, then yes, customer funds are liabilities. But stockbrokers, lawyers, accountants, et al. keep their customers' funds in a segregated trust account, and Mt.Gox and all the other exchanges should be following this model.
Solar UV
No. A rubber sheet is a flawed *model* for the shape of spacetime; as an *analogy*, it's still reasonable...
Presumably the latter -- they paid $200M for it in 2009. (Ouch.)
... are too specific. The concept of an Atomic Operation is important; database transactions are just a domain-specific example.
In the list of concepts, along with OO, closures & functions, recursion is essential knowledge. If in doubt, see this post.
Popular Mechanics have a transcript and analysis of the final 10 minutes.
(*) Except that the numbers they've published are gross, and it's the net that counts.
Share buyback here.
Results here.
CEOs and VCs are not necessarily the people who have ideas, and if they do, they *already* have the means to express them. I'd rather see 100 respected, talented, peer-voted if necessary, folks on the panel: *true* technocrats, true innovators, not financial folks; people with ideas, sometimes wacky ideas, rather than folks money; the people who turn down a promotion to management because it would take them away from the detailed problem-solving.
So, you only receive a brief flash from the laser, and only have a few rods and cones ablated by the coherent pulse from the laser. That one-second blast has only damaged 0.01% of your vision. Ten years down the line, when half your vision is gone, why would you associate the loss with a laser?
That'll be why there's a $1M reward -- cheaper to pay that than pay damages for all the innocent people they shoot by mistake...
Instead of re-inventing the wheel, use the same mechanism that stock markets use: if the price moves too much in a short period of time, a circuit breaker cuts in and suspends trading. It both stops the market getting skewed and signals that there's a problem.
Was this the clip you were thinking of? http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/episodes/ravens/video-raven-intelligence/1549/
Some Thinkpads have the QWERTY section full-sized (e.g. my T420). Arrow keys are below right shift, and Home, End, etc., are above Backspace, so it's not perfect, but it's better than most...