Answer: All of you fucking Europeans who rolled over for the krauts.
Twice.
Would you please take care of your own messes and stop coming to us, the Russians, and the rest of the world when you shit in your own playpen? (BTW, the middle east would also like to thank you for shitting in their playpen while you were in the area)
Damnit, forgot to address another point. I've stated elsewhere (and have others) that the lower receiver is actually a 'gun' according to the ATF in the US. In order to make a gun for sale, you have to go through all sorts of hoops. Making a gun for yourself, not so much. I figure that this 3rd party making a receiver would be 'making a gun' in the eyes of the law and therefore not going to happen. Or not happen much.
Making a grip, sights, barrels, and just about any other part should be ok. Making a lower (and usually a receiver in general) is a dicier proposition. I don't even think 'work for hire' rules/laws get you around this one.
If you submit a design to print a 3D gun, or replacement parts, you'll get them. Of course, the tolerances won't be as close as a specifically machined part, nor would it really be strong enough to use to fire bullets (As it would be made of plastic. Sintered Stainless Steel would be strong enough, but again would have to be machined for an accurate fit).
Except for the point where you are either wrong or grossly overstating things. There are plenty of polymer lowers capable of shooting actual lead bullets (or steel, copper coverings may vary). So far, none of the printed ones seem to have held up long. Then again, the Wright brothers' first attempts weren't so hot either. Or Babbage's first contraptions. But plastic in and of itself is not a deal breaker when it comes to firearms.
Simplicity. There's nothing you can do on a modern computer that cannot be done with an abacus, yet we use them anyway.
Printing a piece, be it a lower receiver for an AR15 or a Warhammer miniature is easier with a home computer printer than it is with a mill or set of woodcarving tools. Outsourcing the printing to a 3rd party is even easier.
You poo poo the time savings of turning out a run of a single copy or short run. That makes sense. But the learning curve to get to that single piece is vastly different.
To clarify (or not) only the part that ATF refers to as the gun must be home built. The object referenced lately as a 'home printed gun' is the lower receiver for an AR style rifle. It is a piece that holds various control bits. When buying a complete AR-15, it is the part carrying the serial no. A part performing essentially the same function is not always the 'gun' according to the ATF for other platforms.
Minor changes. Third order effects. I understand these intellectually. One problem the left has is making me care. I'm reminded of that episode of the Simpsons where the greatest intellects take over the town, much to the annoyance of everyone else. (FWIW, my actual opinion is a pox on all their houses. No foreign aid, no crop subsidies. But if we must engage in a Wilsonian/neo Manifest Destiny global political push considerations such as the one you raise must be addressed. But cold logic isn't the place to start.)
Trolling for page views. Slanted political pieces are possibly even better than Apple/Samsung/Google/Microsoft hit pieces. Just as biased and uninformed (from the headline down to the -1 comments) but reach out to a broader base.
Much better source. Not sure if it can qualify as reference to a Wikipedia article, but relevant to discussions here. I'd like to see the original emails, but this synopsis seems to be how RMS saw it.
Actually all the BSDs share code frequently. It's also not dying, although traditional memes might say otherwise. Let me guess, you have a beowulf cluster of natalie portman dolls covered in grits?
Slashdot Mirror
Then again, in the restaurant business, nobody would manage to sell dog food mixed with vomit to 95% of the customers in the first place.
Umm, the McRib IS due for a return later today, smartass.
It's cute that you believe it works like this.
Who can possibly refute the reams of evidence you have linked to to support your implied claim.
All I know about the war room is there is no fighting allowed.
And we must not allow a mine shaft gap!
Time to start playing them against the Russians in order to get favorable rates to the ISS?
Answer: All of you fucking Europeans who rolled over for the krauts.
Twice.
Would you please take care of your own messes and stop coming to us, the Russians, and the rest of the world when you shit in your own playpen? (BTW, the middle east would also like to thank you for shitting in their playpen while you were in the area)
I cannot make my mind, are you fucking retarded, a troll, or just a lawyer that love complex things for complex sake?
He's an American. Haven't you heard how awful our public schools are?
Might it be that you're being deliberately obtuse for the sake of trolling, Mr. AC?
Seems like a stretch, but there's a first time for everything.
Can I nominate John Travolta as Edna Turnblad (Divine) as Brando/Kurtz in your reimagining? Because I would actually pay to see that.
"The horror" indeed...
Damnit, forgot to address another point. I've stated elsewhere (and have others) that the lower receiver is actually a 'gun' according to the ATF in the US. In order to make a gun for sale, you have to go through all sorts of hoops. Making a gun for yourself, not so much. I figure that this 3rd party making a receiver would be 'making a gun' in the eyes of the law and therefore not going to happen. Or not happen much.
Making a grip, sights, barrels, and just about any other part should be ok. Making a lower (and usually a receiver in general) is a dicier proposition. I don't even think 'work for hire' rules/laws get you around this one.
If you submit a design to print a 3D gun, or replacement parts, you'll get them. Of course, the tolerances won't be as close as a specifically machined part, nor would it really be strong enough to use to fire bullets (As it would be made of plastic. Sintered Stainless Steel would be strong enough, but again would have to be machined for an accurate fit).
Except for the point where you are either wrong or grossly overstating things. There are plenty of polymer lowers capable of shooting actual lead bullets (or steel, copper coverings may vary). So far, none of the printed ones seem to have held up long. Then again, the Wright brothers' first attempts weren't so hot either. Or Babbage's first contraptions. But plastic in and of itself is not a deal breaker when it comes to firearms.
You're a fucking MORON. Christ, people like you just play right into the TSA paranoia trip... I'll bet you're a Tea Bagger, too.
I don't think 'girlintraining' has teabags, but whatever.
Simplicity. There's nothing you can do on a modern computer that cannot be done with an abacus, yet we use them anyway.
Printing a piece, be it a lower receiver for an AR15 or a Warhammer miniature is easier with a home computer printer than it is with a mill or set of woodcarving tools. Outsourcing the printing to a 3rd party is even easier.
You poo poo the time savings of turning out a run of a single copy or short run. That makes sense. But the learning curve to get to that single piece is vastly different.
To clarify (or not) only the part that ATF refers to as the gun must be home built. The object referenced lately as a 'home printed gun' is the lower receiver for an AR style rifle. It is a piece that holds various control bits. When buying a complete AR-15, it is the part carrying the serial no. A part performing essentially the same function is not always the 'gun' according to the ATF for other platforms.
sounds like you have bigger problems than ordering crap you could easily make out of any material
This is not news regarding OP.
Minor changes. Third order effects. I understand these intellectually. One problem the left has is making me care. I'm reminded of that episode of the Simpsons where the greatest intellects take over the town, much to the annoyance of everyone else. (FWIW, my actual opinion is a pox on all their houses. No foreign aid, no crop subsidies. But if we must engage in a Wilsonian/neo Manifest Destiny global political push considerations such as the one you raise must be addressed. But cold logic isn't the place to start.)
Trolling for page views. Slanted political pieces are possibly even better than Apple/Samsung/Google/Microsoft hit pieces. Just as biased and uninformed (from the headline down to the -1 comments) but reach out to a broader base.
You should see a good chiropractor. After such a desperate bending over backwards as you just did, misalignment is inevitable.
It's a shame Dr. Bob seems to be retired.
Is he related to the singer?
That copycat? Fuck him. Let him change his name.
The point you don't understand is that I don't fucking care anywhere near as much about the 'target nation' as I do my own.
Hoovering random scraps of psychotic ramblings into your skull does not lead to some grand insight. It just fills your head full of shit.
Much better source. Not sure if it can qualify as reference to a Wikipedia article, but relevant to discussions here. I'd like to see the original emails, but this synopsis seems to be how RMS saw it.
Thanks.
Actually all the BSDs share code frequently. It's also not dying, although traditional memes might say otherwise. Let me guess, you have a beowulf cluster of natalie portman dolls covered in grits?
Naked and petrified, kid. Naked and petrified.
I once rogered a lawyer named Sue. Does that count?
I always wondered what happened to that guy after he got into the fistfight with his old man.
I have never seen until about a week ago.
I am surprised it was never linked here. Or maybe I never saw it?
Downmodded by gnus when it gets posted. Usually.
Lets just go all the way with the silliness and call them "spokes carbon based life forms."
The Horta would like a word with you, speciesist (elementalist?).