I agree completely, just need to address one point.
What about a social network that is decentralized? I'm sure that will become popular one day. What about connecting to your friends based upon your own personal directory of people you have some sort of relationship with
because my submissions have a history of being rejected (somewhere around a 12% acceptance rate). Also, I didn't think such a dry profile (as interesting as it was to me) was/. worthy.
I don't either, and generally I don't read the online (or offline) papers. I do get news from several sources though (mainly because I subscribed to a feed for keeping up with what groups are doing politically).
I don't question the validity of their information. If their information wasn't valid, then companies wouldn't sue to have it taken down the way they have been. They'd be going with anti-defamation suits. They haven't been.
This is an unusual case of patent law, not because of any supposed trolling, but because it's a superb example of how patent law was always meant to be used.
After reading the article (both of them), I would put it squarely on her as there is no way (if there was more traffic at the time of the accident) he could have avoided hitting her.
Slashdot Mirror
OK tan
Yay, skin cancer!
Yay not having to take Vitamin D supplements or eat Vitamin D fortified foods and drinks!
Indeed.
Are there plans for a rail gun?
If there are, I want to be the first to test fire it. :D
I would venture to say that this is definitely a win for private-sector aerospace. (:
Hey now, kimchee isn't that bad. :p
I'm talking about a Declared State of Emergency. http://www.volconvo.com/forums/politics-government/887-declared-state-emergency-usa-since-1933-a.html
I hope your wrong too. We've been in some sort of state of emergency since the New Deal.
I agree completely, just need to address one point.
What about a social network that is decentralized? I'm sure that will become popular one day. What about connecting to your friends based upon your own personal directory of people you have some sort of relationship with
http://www.joindiaspora.com/
There better be :-p
Careful now, MS might sue you!
epic fail
because my submissions have a history of being rejected (somewhere around a 12% acceptance rate). Also, I didn't think such a dry profile (as interesting as it was to me) was /. worthy.
probably a /. mod with an ax to grind. I tend to piss people off for one reason or another.
I don't either, and generally I don't read the online (or offline) papers. I do get news from several sources though (mainly because I subscribed to a feed for keeping up with what groups are doing politically).
I don't question the validity of their information. If their information wasn't valid, then companies wouldn't sue to have it taken down the way they have been. They'd be going with anti-defamation suits. They haven't been.
You should try going elsewhere for you news aside from /. :p The first referenced article is the one I read.
I read about this yesterday.
This is an unusual case of patent law, not because of any supposed trolling, but because it's a superb example of how patent law was always meant to be used.
It...it...it can't be!
I always believed that the "shrimp" term was an ironic statement referring to an extremely large, or "Australian-sized," steak. Is this not correct?
If it's under 16oz, it isn't even American sized. :p
No, I just lost geek points :p
part of me is ashamed that I had to go to Wikipedia to look up the reference despite having seen those episodes of Voyager.
You would think, but this is /., and more to the point, idle on /. so I imagine for those who post to idle, April Fool's Day is never over. Never.
That is obvious.
speed limits are posted, other laws may or may not be posted (such as whether or not pedestrians can walk on certain roads).
After reading the article (both of them), I would put it squarely on her as there is no way (if there was more traffic at the time of the accident) he could have avoided hitting her.
Yeah, she's fishing for a settlement.