They can tell where your vision is directed and automatically bring up search engine results using advanced machine learning. The only problem is this predictive execution can occur across protection domains, which means its vulnerable to Meltdown attacks that would allow someone to read your inner thoughts every time you stare at a cup of coffee.
If you're a photojournalist leaving a dangerous field assignment then there's a high likelihood you will be stopped and searched. If you hand over your camera and it comes up with a prompt for an encryption password then your camera and its media will be confiscated or destroyed in front of you. There go your photos.
As for protecting sources, why would you photograph them if you didn't intend to publish the photos anyway, which would still put them in danger?
I would think that with ownership so concentrated -- 1,000 accounts hold 40% of all value -- with another 30-50% estimated to be lost and out of circulation, I question a psychological model based off of so few possible sample sets. That's just crazy.
The short-term price movements of a financial instrument is usually determined "at the margins", which is a fancy way of saying it's determined by the most recent (and active) set of buyers and sellers.
You know - the guy whose wife got almost $1 million from Hillary! cronies - while he was "investigating" Hillary!'s illegal email server.
That's outrageous. Too bad it's not true. McCabe was assigned to the Hillary investigation four months after his wife lost her election, well before she received those contributions. And nobody had foreknowledge that McCabe would actually be assigned to Hillary's investigation either.
The headline implies this change will prevent sites from knowing what site you linked from. That's incorrect. From the article:
To prevent this type of data leakage, from Firefox 59, the private browsing option will remove path information from referrer values sent to third parties, effectively stripping out additional data and only leaving the web domain.
I'm not going to make the case BTC has any intrinsic value - IMO its intrinsic value is $0. But technical analysis is fare more than random patterns and luck, and doesn't require the underlying instrument to have intrinsic value to predict short-term movements of that instrument.
It's probably based on technical analysis, which studies the trend of trading for an instrument to pick out the psychological buy/sell levels. For example, if the trading history indicates many people entered BTC at $10k and the price has been trading consistently below that for some time, the expectation is that when/if it reaches $10k again there will be a lot of selling pressure by some holders who want to get out to break even. That creates what's called a resistance level. The same thing happens on the other end of the price, where buyers who held out on the sidelines and missed out on a run will buy when BTC drops to a level it was at before a recent run. That creates what's called the support level.
I'm grasping fine - you're putting misplaced confidence in the term "backed", as if it's some type of self-enacting guarantee. Let's say the US Government still said the USD was backed by gold. Then a currency crisis of confidence happened and everyone rushes to exchange their dollars for gold, after which the Government changes their mind and says "sorry, we're no longer going to allow you to exchange your dollars for gold". Now what? You see, "backing" is just a promise, the same as how fiat is just a promise.
Fiat currency is backed by the full faith and credit of the US Government, which includes but is not limited to it's power to levy taxes on the income and productive capacity of the economy to recover the wealth lost in that currency.
CNN saw Casey's 8.7 million youtube subscribers and thought buying him out was a sure way transfer a chunk of those eyeballs to CNN, provided he was the front-man for whatever media content they came up with. CNN was so sure of this strategy that they feared someone else would execute it first, which prompted them to not only buy Casey but also his entire Beme company, to bail it out of the hole it dug itself and its investors into from that failing first-person video app of theirs.
Proof again that making hasty decisions based on FOMO rather than common sense are usually wrong and very expensive mistakes.
Slashdot Mirror
Regulating virtual currency makes about as much sense as regulating Flooz Dollars.
Those pesky consumers have been running roughshod over our sacred corporations for too long.
That's called taking care of your installed base.
They can tell where your vision is directed and automatically bring up search engine results using advanced machine learning. The only problem is this predictive execution can occur across protection domains, which means its vulnerable to Meltdown attacks that would allow someone to read your inner thoughts every time you stare at a cup of coffee.
It was a nice reprieve from what was otherwise a pretty underwhelming set of commercials this Super Bowl.
If you're a photojournalist leaving a dangerous field assignment then there's a high likelihood you will be stopped and searched. If you hand over your camera and it comes up with a prompt for an encryption password then your camera and its media will be confiscated or destroyed in front of you. There go your photos.
As for protecting sources, why would you photograph them if you didn't intend to publish the photos anyway, which would still put them in danger?
I would think that with ownership so concentrated -- 1,000 accounts hold 40% of all value -- with another 30-50% estimated to be lost and out of circulation, I question a psychological model based off of so few possible sample sets. That's just crazy.
The short-term price movements of a financial instrument is usually determined "at the margins", which is a fancy way of saying it's determined by the most recent (and active) set of buyers and sellers.
Yeah, political incest is irrelevant Not as relevant as getting the facts correct in the first place.
You know - the guy whose wife got almost $1 million from Hillary! cronies - while he was "investigating" Hillary!'s illegal email server.
That's outrageous. Too bad it's not true. McCabe was assigned to the Hillary investigation four months after his wife lost her election, well before she received those contributions. And nobody had foreknowledge that McCabe would actually be assigned to Hillary's investigation either.
The headline implies this change will prevent sites from knowing what site you linked from. That's incorrect. From the article:
To prevent this type of data leakage, from Firefox 59, the private browsing option will remove path information from referrer values sent to third parties, effectively stripping out additional data and only leaving the web domain.
I'm not going to make the case BTC has any intrinsic value - IMO its intrinsic value is $0. But technical analysis is fare more than random patterns and luck, and doesn't require the underlying instrument to have intrinsic value to predict short-term movements of that instrument.
It's probably based on technical analysis, which studies the trend of trading for an instrument to pick out the psychological buy/sell levels. For example, if the trading history indicates many people entered BTC at $10k and the price has been trading consistently below that for some time, the expectation is that when/if it reaches $10k again there will be a lot of selling pressure by some holders who want to get out to break even. That creates what's called a resistance level. The same thing happens on the other end of the price, where buyers who held out on the sidelines and missed out on a run will buy when BTC drops to a level it was at before a recent run. That creates what's called the support level.
As in learning to come up with as many bullshit buzzwords they can fit into a sentence to describe what would otherwise be a pedestrian algorithm.
Ok, you got me. My real name is StinkySox.
And a meltdown for Intel.
Because it's all relative in West Virginia.
That way the monkeys got a much smaller does of carbon monoxide, as in much less than us human's got from the thousands of VW cars on the road.
I'm grasping fine - you're putting misplaced confidence in the term "backed", as if it's some type of self-enacting guarantee. Let's say the US Government still said the USD was backed by gold. Then a currency crisis of confidence happened and everyone rushes to exchange their dollars for gold, after which the Government changes their mind and says "sorry, we're no longer going to allow you to exchange your dollars for gold". Now what? You see, "backing" is just a promise, the same as how fiat is just a promise.
Fiat currency is backed by the full faith and credit of the US Government, which includes but is not limited to it's power to levy taxes on the income and productive capacity of the economy to recover the wealth lost in that currency.
Now tell me, who and what backs cryptocurrency?
If so I'd like to report $15,140 stolen from a Monopoly game I own that's gone missing.
Which is also why McDonalds sells 6.5 million hamburgers every day.
https://www.reddit.com/r/caseyneistat/comments/7swlm5/deleted_video/dt7ywnd/?context=2
CNN saw Casey's 8.7 million youtube subscribers and thought buying him out was a sure way transfer a chunk of those eyeballs to CNN, provided he was the front-man for whatever media content they came up with. CNN was so sure of this strategy that they feared someone else would execute it first, which prompted them to not only buy Casey but also his entire Beme company, to bail it out of the hole it dug itself and its investors into from that failing first-person video app of theirs.
Proof again that making hasty decisions based on FOMO rather than common sense are usually wrong and very expensive mistakes.
A patch that causes systems to reboot or otherwise be unstable is not a viable patch, so my comment stands.
Qualcomm's provision for exclusivity in exchange for the discount is what is anti-competitive, not the discount itself.