Slashdot Mirror


Drug Firms Shipped 20.8 Million Pain Pills To West Virginia Town of 2,900 (foxnews.com)

A congressional committee investigating the opioid crisis has discovered out-of-state drug companies shipped 20.8 million prescription painkillers over a decade to two pharmacies in a Southern West Virginia town with 2,900 people. From a report: Between 2006 and 2016, two drug wholesalers shipped 10.2 million hydrocodone pills and 10.6 million oxycodone pills to Tug Valley Pharmacy and Hurley Drug in the town of Williamson, in Mingo County, the Charleston Gazette-Mail reported. "These numbers are outrageous, and we will get to the bottom of how this destruction was able to be unleashed across West Virginia," the House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Greg Walden, R-Ore. and ranking member Frank Pallone Jr., D-N.J. said in a joint statement.

347 comments

  1. If I lived in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I would get high every day too.

    1. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 4, Interesting
      20.8M / 2900 ~ 7,172
      7,172 / 10 (years) ~ 717
      717 / 12 (months) ~ 60 pills.

      Basically, everyone in town was given a standing prescription of take 2 pills per day as needed for pain. Up the script to 3 pills per day as needed and you've got a standing prescription for about 1,925 people. Consider that pharmacies often keep a stock of these pills for rapid fulfillment (Wal-greens will usually have whatever prescription my doc gives me ready within an hour; narc or not), and it's likely that not even that many people have standing scripts.

      Also, how long do pharmacies keep med batches on hand? They often have expiration dates slated for 90 days. They're supposed to dispose of unused portions of batches, right? Well, how are they going to keep the stock up to handle the medicated population when they get their next round of scripts? This is going to inflate the order that the drug companies are going to get.

      In short, this sounds like someone with an axe to grind trying to inflate emotional response by using a 10 year metric that only indicates how much opiates are getting shipped into community pharmacies, not how much is actually being doled out and prescribed to the community.

    2. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In short, this sounds like someone with an axe to grind trying to inflate emotional response by using a 10 year metric that only indicates how much opiates are getting shipped into community pharmacies, not how much is actually being doled out and prescribed to the community.

      Sure, and if you can find numbers on how many pills got destructed because "expired", then subtract them, you'd suddenly have a much fairer idea of what's going on. Because 2/3rds of a town popping three pain pills a day for a decade is quite a lot. I haven't had as much as an aspirin in, oh, quite a few years.

      On the other hand, could well be that this town turns out to've been used as a conduit (indubitably as one of many) into the black market. Apparently these pills are rather in demand. Which itself is quite interesting as there's no shortage of not-even-prescribable black market recreational pharmaceuticals to be had, and there's not that much of a price difference. Or so tells me nat geo channel*.

      It's been said that the cause of much of that addiction is poor management: Simply prescribe the pills for some need or other, and skip dealing with the patient's dependency, if any, once the physical ailment has healed. And that is a serious problem with medical practice in general.

      Meaning that both partisan accusations and including these pills in the usual war on drugs are entirely improper and inappropriate to deal with this problem. Not that the usual war on drugs is an effective way to deal with that problem, on the contrary. But then, it does seem to me that the partisan shtick is a great way to distract yourself while various TLAgencies do their thing to seem important, but mostly perpetuate their fake importance. The USoA has a lot of that going on.

      So anyway, yes, these numbers are notorious half-truths and trumped-up to boot. But at the same time they might still point at a problem. And then it's fairly important to frame (or re-frame or counter-frame) the narrative into something reasonably solvable, lest you get another overbearing TLAgency cracking down on abstract badness, which in this case could well cost you reasonable access to needed medication.

      * I'm not actually in the US, but in Euroland. The nat geo channel I can get here does broadcast a lot of narc-related programming, mostly about North and South America. And then there's the various "border patrol" programmes, for which same, plus Australia. How accurate those portrayals are I cannot say.

    3. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by plopez · · Score: 5, Insightful

      realistically how many people per thousand actually need heavy opiates? How many would be in a town that size? 1 in 3 adults are getting prescriptions from the numbers I am finding. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/m...

      Let's adjust by 50% to cover children, pregnant women, macho men (I can take the pain), masochists, etc. and divide by 3. That works out to about 483.

      483/60 = 8.05 which seems excessive.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    4. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 0

      Possibly one of the most naive comments I've ever read.

      "In short, this sounds like someone with an axe to grind trying to inflate emotional response by using a 10 year metric that only indicates how much opiates are getting shipped into community pharmacies, not how much is actually being doled out and prescribed to the community."

      I live near there, the pills were definitely being dispensed.

    5. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by butchersong · · Score: 1

      West Virginia is an absolutely beautiful place to live. What isn't so great is the current epidemic. Personally I'd like to do away with all prescription opiates. The "chronic pain" they address cannot outweigh the suffering they inflict on communities. Next remove them and all forms of welfare. Keep it if you want in your large cities but over here, it would be better that men would have to struggle and work to get by again. The biggest problem in these regions is lack of purpose. Men need work. One thing we have in WV and KY is plenty of soil to grow crops in. Not many though are going to work all day to grow some corn and beans if they can get a welfare/disability check that lets them buy more food at the grocery and spend the day sitting on their ass.

    6. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Up the script to 3 pills per day as needed and you've got a standing prescription for about 1,925 people.

      If more than half the population has been prescribed strong opiates, that is a pretty big problem itself, considering over-prescription is one of the things that leads to abuse and addiction issues. That almost seems worse that a couple doctors in a small town got everyone on pain pills telling them it was good for them instead of the alternative idea that a couple pharmacists were selling them on the black market without the pretense of legitimacy.

    7. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by gtall · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So, in your dog-eat-dog world, the children of the unemployed get squat which translates into a new generation of un-educated, malnourished sprogs who will be a burden when they turn to crime to make ends meet. Their parents might be able to give them pointers on how to do it well.

      You can either pay them now or pay for them later, either way, you will pay.

    8. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by careysub · · Score: 3, Informative

      The presumption that everybody in town has a prescription for a very powerful narcotic (instead of say, codeine) is the presumption that this is a "pill mill", rather that proof to the contrary.

      National dispensing rates are something like 0.75 prescriptions per person per year, so this town would have had 22,000 units dispensed over the ten year period. People are not picking up bottles of 900 pills. Even assuming the rate for this town due to its composition is higher than normal, this is a factor of at least ten fold too high. And these opioid prescription rate are for all opioids not just these powerful and addicting ones. Most opioid prescriptions would normally be for less potent ones like codeine, propoxyphene (Darvon), and tramadol. So getting this much oxycodone and hydrocodone is something like a factor of 100 too high.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    9. Re: If I lived in West Virginia by reanjr · · Score: 2

      So now that cities are thriving and suburbs and rural areas are the center for welfare queen drug abusers, you want to cancel welfare in the rural areas so your rural degenerates will flee to the city and prop up your collapsing home prices. Do I have that right?

    10. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by nomadic · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem with your theory is that opioids are prescribed for extreme pain, and typically only for short periods of time following things like surgery. An entire town being prescribed them is beyond insane and there is no way you can feasibly make it out to sound like everyone in town -- every man, woman, and child -- needs them.

    11. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I'd like to do away with all prescription opiates. The "chronic pain" they address cannot outweigh the suffering they inflict on communities.

      Thank you kind Sire, I do not wish you that you have family member who really needs opiates. Your "simple solution" will torment or kill only small group. Why bother.
      I do not live in the Us , My wife has 2-3 month stash of her prescribed opiates because where we live there are sometimes 2 month lags in availability. That is one lesson learned. And it will be that way till her "end of natural life".

      Next remove them and all forms of welfare. Keep it if you want in your large cities but over here, it would be better that men would have to struggle and work to get by again. The biggest problem in these regions is lack of purpose. Men need work.

      Now you are talking my language.
      Men need work, and children need fathers.
      Why discriminate "large cities"? Welfare is an epidemic where nobody is looking to cure.
      March or die.
      But wait ... that is racist, sexists, and plenty of other isms.

    12. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by thegarbz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1 in 3 adults are getting prescriptions from the numbers I am finding.

      Let me just say: WHAT THE FUCK!

    13. Re: If I lived in West Virginia by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

      You should probably read a little about the history of opium.

    14. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by rahvin112 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Small towns like that are often 50% or more elderly. By my calculations that would offer 962 people in town a monthly supply of 180pills which is a fairly typical maintenance dose (2 pills 3 times a day). Given the size of the town and the likely high numbers of elderly I find nothing wrong with this other than rather obvious political scapegoating. The real political story in this number is the large number of people with chronic pain and/or cancer. Is this is town a cancer cluster?

      Short acting opiates take 20 minutes to affect you, require an hour to reach full potency and gradually fall off till the 4 hour point where they begin to drop off steeply until about 6 hours. Anyone that's taking pain meds for chronic pain is going to be taking doses 3-4 times a day minimum. Typically these people are also at least partly opiod tolerant and will need to take 2 pills at a time.

      I see nothing out of the ordinary here.

    15. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. My sister and her husband live near Bridgeport WV, and there's a terrible drug issue there, and growing gang violence. Since the Marcellus Shale natural gas was discovered, a lot of rural WV has a lot of newfound money. They can't built housing (hotels, townhouses, etc) fast enough for the workers. It's easy to say "oh, it's just WV" like it's a bunch of poor hicks, but those hicks are selling their drilling rights.

      On the other side, I'm surprised that the dealers were able to work the system, without being caught. Why run drugs in from Mexico, when you can get yourself a crooked pharmacist to fill out some forms, and have it delivered right to your local town straight from the manufacturer? I guess as long as everyone's invoice got paid, no one cared about the volume of drugs.

    16. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by magarity · · Score: 1

      Deliverance was set in Georgia, not West Virginia.

    17. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by sjames · · Score: 3, Informative

      Now include the people living in unincorporated areas (so not counted as part of the town's population) for whom the town has the nearest to them pharmacy. Include that coal mining and other physically demanding work is quite common in West Virginia.

      In many places, rural doesn't mean farms. It is more or less as dense as suburban areas but with no strip malls or corner stores. All of those people go into town for shopping, including the pharmacy.

      Williamson is the county seat of the surrounding county with a population of 30,000. Suddenly, the numbers don't look that out of line, just sensationalistic.

    18. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans are prescribed opioids at 10 times the rate of other developed nations (except Canada which is becoming more like the US in overusing opioids).

      So, there is either a HUGE underlying medical issues that Americans face, which Europeans do not, or the medications are being over prescribed.

      My money is on opioids being overprescribed, not surprisingly, there is a lot of money in the prescription opioid game, just look at the family which owns Purdue Pharma

       

    19. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by amicusNYCL · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Up the script to 3 pills per day as needed and you've got a standing prescription for about 1,925 people.

      That's quitter talk, every baby should also be on opiates. You'll shit your pants when you see what happens to stock prices and revenue when we get babies addicted as earlier as possible. Because that's literally the only thing that matters, stock prices, and revenue. In fact, the real story here is that these babies ONLY get 2 doses of neo-heroin per day. Those are rookie numbers.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    20. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a game where we try to say "Fuck you, I got mine." as eloquently as we can. Here's mine... If you are poor it is because you don't work hard enough.

    21. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by amicusNYCL · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So anyway, yes, these numbers are notorious half-truths and trumped-up to boot. But at the same time they might still point at a problem.

      Is that your takeaway from this story? 20.8 million doses of heavy opiates shipped to a town of 2,900 over a decade and you're takeaway is that this "might point to a problem?" I realize you don't live in the US, but do you understand the number and frequency of opiate overdose deaths that are occurring in the US? Do you understand that doctors and pharmaceutical companies are culpable for pushing this product to people who don't need it so that they make more money, while Congress passes laws to restrict it so that people who actually do need it can't get it? Nothing that I just said is political, people would only have a political position on that if they're being paid to have one, or if they have been preached to by a spokesperson with a profit motive.

      And then it's fairly important to frame (or re-frame or counter-frame) the narrative into something reasonably solvable

      Holding doctors accountable when their patients die from overdose on an unnecessary medication prescribed by the doctor is a good first step. Maybe it will drive some of them away from prescribing without another thought just because they're going to get a kickback when they do prescribe something the person doesn't need. In other words, the profit motive needs to be removed. A complete overhaul of the health care system would also do that, but there are too many people making too much money in order to expect any meaningful change there.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    22. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by plopez · · Score: 1

      per 2010 census 21.3% over age 65. So I don't think that age range had a huge impact.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    23. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by plopez · · Score: 1

      There are 7 pharmacies in town. Though no numbers on numbers of doses.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    24. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      and you're takeaway is

      I must now commit seppuku. Might as well stay on topic and overdose on oxy.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    25. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by amicusNYCL · · Score: 4, Funny

      realistically how many people per thousand actually need heavy opiates?

      According to drug manufacturers and wholesalers? About 1,000.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    26. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by amicusNYCL · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do you have any friends taking 2 opiate pills 3 times per day, at least that you know of?

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    27. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      a new generation of un-educated, malnourished sprogs who will be a burden

      Don't forget that they also have no health care to speak of, because that is the responsibility of the individual, as I've heard a number of so-called "pro-life" people try to tell me.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    28. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 0

      Ok, this is a town that services the gas/coal mining industry so it's going to be a town with a high focus on physical labor. Since mining corporations tend to tell their injured workers to take a pill and suck it up, it's probably closer to a 1/2 ratio or 2/3 ratio of adults getting opiate prescriptions.

      Now, going by the 2000 and 2010 census records, there's less than 20% of the population that's children (18.6%). Right there we're looking at an adult population of about 2,360. It's a 45.2% / 54.8% split on gender.. so a bit over 1000 men and 1200 women. Since both genders are prescribed opiates for a variety of reasons (some legit, others less so), 50% of the total adult working population in a mining support town getting prescribed opiates isn't an unreasonable assumption, so that's 1,180 people.

      1180 * 60 = 70,800 pills / month (2 per day)
      70,800 * 12 = 849,600 per year
      849,600 * 10 = 8,496,000 over the 10 year period.

      Considering that I have known people with back injuries that get prescribed 4 pills per day chronically for years, but lower doses per pill, the numbers above could easily be doubled, which leaves roughly 4 to 5 million pills unaccounted for, which could potentially be explained away by expiration protocols.

      Now, do I think the numbers above are excessive? Yes. Is there a need to get prescription opiates under stricter control? Yes. Is there anything criminal about any of the above that needs a full on investigation into the pharmacies in question? Hell No. As noted by sjames on this thread, there's a likelyhood that these pharmacies are serving a greater area than just the 2900 residents of the town, which would change all the calculations thus far to increase the potential numbers all around. Turning the pharmacies into a congressional scapegoat against opiates is a waste of time and money.

      Instead, go after the mining companies that refuse to allow better working conditions with proper injury recuperation policies. Go after the docs that are over prescribing the opiates to begin with. The pharmacies are only filling orders and raising supply to keep up with demand.

      Source of Census and Demographic information.

    29. Re: If I lived in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The irony of narcotics regulation is that the drugs regarded as the "most powerful" are generally LESS harmful in absolute terms than the ones viewed as "less powerful". In terms of potential for direct individual harm, codeine is arguably much, MUCH worse than drugs like oxycodone. The whole REASON codeine is less-regulated is because it's SO UNPLEASANT (vs oxycodone), it has less appeal for recreational abuse (and greater likelihood of causing death when abused). For someone to abuse codeine, they have to be absolutely *desperate*.

      The main thing that keeps long-term opoid users with pain problems addicted is a very real & justified fear of having them suddenly taken away. If people were free to take them until they overdosed, but could seek withdrawal-management assistance at any time -- without risk of getting their meds cut off permanently before their addiction & withdrawal has been fully managed -- I think a lot more people would voluntarily *attempt* to wean off... and keep trying, if the first attempt (or several) fails. As it is, if someone taking opioid pain meds even *hints* to having concerns about dependency or addiction, they'll usually be cut off *instantly* & left to fend for themselves at a point when they're the least ABLE to do so.

      People also differ in their ability to handle pain. It's a spectrum. Some people seem oblivious to even horrific pain. Others can't have two coherent thoughts in a row if they have an itch. No degree of pain-intolerance should be shamed, nor should abnormally-high pain-tolerance be seen as morally-superior (though in America, it usually is).

      Opioid dependence is the natural & expected outcome of long-term use, and should be treated as such. "Rapid opiod detox" (using anesthesia & other meds to rapidly get patients through withdrawal effects) should be no more viewed as shameful or a sign of weakness than getting sutures removed once a wound has closed up. Instead, we subject people who become dependent upon painkillers to judgment as 'addicts' for the rest of their lives, even though we know damn well that 99.9% of people who WERE dependent at one point & manage to stop tend to be averse to them ANYWAY going forward.

    30. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by sjames · · Score: 1

      A typical prescription is one every three hours as needed, so 8/day/person.

    31. Re: If I lived in West Virginia by NeoMorphy · · Score: 1

      How would they expire? They would be lucky to stay in supply. As long as they fifo the inventory, it's probably 2 weeks old at the most. I think it's as bad as it looks.

    32. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by plopez · · Score: 1

      the 8 per day was only for 2 pharmacies, not counting the other 5. What probably happened was someone notices those 2 pharmacies were filling way more Rx per person than the other ones in the area, which includes a Wal-Mart.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    33. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by slacktide · · Score: 2

      Did you read the link? It says that 1 out of every 3 adults was prescribed opiates at some point in the previous 12 months. That's not particularly concerning if you ask me - I was prescribed them twice in that time period, once for a tooth extraction and once for a broken finger. What I thought was interesting was the amounts that were prescribed - for the teeth, the doc issued a prescription for 3 days worth. (12 pills total) For the finger, that doc issued 30 days worth, which seemed REALLY excessive.

    34. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by plopez · · Score: 1

      Including the offenders there are 7 pharmacies in town. Your est. looks better than mine (8) but neither of us of had any numbers on the other 5 pharmacies.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    35. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by slacktide · · Score: 1

      It won't be possible to shit your pants, due to the opiod-induced constipation.

    36. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by Erik+Hensema · · Score: 2

      Where I live you wouldn't have gotten opiates in both cases. Ibuprofen in a slightly higher dosis then over-the-counter, if you're lucky. And then for a week max.

      So yes, I think it's quite excessive what you got.

      I live in the Netherlands by the way.

      --

      This is your sig. There are thousands more, but this one is yours.

    37. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it was filmed there because the South Carolina river that the story was about was flooded by the construction of the Lake Jocassee dam. So, set in Georgia (with at least one scene from South Carolina) to depict a story in South Carolina.

    38. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Noooo you end up with un-educated, malnourished, potential VOTERS who will blindly vote for what ever populist is able to "speak to their hearts" no matter what BS he/she is feeding them! A huge win!

    39. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, one's a diabetic with all kinds of health issues, not less than 15 on any day. Another because of many post accident surgeries, not less than 10/day. This isn't OMG big numbers. Surprised they didn't just sum all the available years data, one really big number.

    40. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Up the script to 3 pills per day as needed and you've got a standing prescription for about 1,925 people.

      That's quitter talk, every baby should also be on opiates. You'll shit your pants when you see what happens to stock prices and revenue when we get babies addicted as earlier as possible. Because that's literally the only thing that matters, stock prices, and revenue. In fact, the real story here is that these babies ONLY get 2 doses of neo-heroin per day. Those are rookie numbers.

      Well, you really need to start thinking outside the box. We can genetically engineer these babies to be more resistant to opioids, thereby increasing the necessary dosage. I'm calling the patent attorneys!

    41. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're on the right track, but there are a couple more orders of magnitude of error to consider.

      WV is a rural area. Far more live outside of town than in. Mingo County's population is over 25,000. On top of that, the area is so sparse that people will drive across multiple counties for services and shopping.

      Also, the people in the Mingo/Logan County area have lived extremely hard lives. Many have serious injuries from logging and mining. The logging industry in the area is largely under the table and unregulated. They seem to make it an average of three or four years before having an injury that will affect them the rest of their lives. It is also a declining and aging population. Many of those left behind are the ones too old or injured to start a new life elsewhere. So, the rate of legitimate usage is many times greater than other regions of the country.

      So, yes, this article sensationalizes the problem by at least an order of magnitude just on the basis of the understatement of the population served and by much more when you factor in the physical cost of the life.

      That is not to say they don't have a problem. Just that it is not near as insane as the article depicts.

      Note that the primary business of West Virginia is farming poverty and misery. The powerful have figured out how to profit on jails (they are privatized) and clinics. In 2010, WV had the highest income growth of only six states that had income growth that year because over 27% received a government check. The economic crisis didn't actually hit them until 2012 when the various giveaways started wearing off. They routinely lead the nation in the ratio of Federal tax dollars received to taxes paid. If you look at the consumption of Federal tax dollars as an industry, it is their top industry. They love to have these problems because they can get money to solve them.

    42. Re: If I lived in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are physically and mentally addicted to pain pills. But nothing to see here folks.

    43. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't Rocky Mountains be more appropriate for that?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    44. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by sjames · · Score: 1

      Without appropriate figures including shipments to other pharmacies, it's hard to say much of anything about the situation. All we have is the total number of pills over a 10 year period.

      The one thing I can say for sure is that the information appears to have been presented in a form to maximize sensationalism and minimize usefulness. That seems like a pretty good reason to be skeptical of the conclusion we are being lead ever so carefully to draw.

    45. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If it sounds insane, suspect the story first. That town serves a county with a population of around 25K. In that area, the population is extremely spread. People often travel from other counties for service.

      The misrepresentation of the population served is only one of many problems with this article.

      Also, if you think opioids are only for short periods of time, you've never lived around a declining population of loggers, miners, and older people who were loggers and miners. Virtually all are suffering injuries sustained in a hard life that will never be fixed. Even if there are surgeries that could help, they can't afford them.

      It is interesting that we have laws to require industries that destroy land to restore it, but they are rarely held accountable to restore the lives they used.

    46. Re: If I lived in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a pill shop community now. It destroyed my home town and now there are countless articles about it.

      If the pharmacies are stocking and shipping that much product out then they are in on it. The guy who owns the docs probably owns the pharmacy.

      Back home basically every pharmacy for 800 miles refused to fill oxy pills from my area. 2000 count pills per patient isn't right.

      Eventually the pill shops started filling their own meds. Then they were on both sides of the profit train.

      I'll wager tens of thousands of dollars the number of out of town plates in that city is astronomical. Eventually they might stop it, but the populace will be fucked. They will just switch to heroin.

      The smart man would start selling heroin real soon to establish himself.

    47. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      And we can destroy complete industries, replace them with foreign manufactured goods, and not give a second thought to the people whose lives, communities, and families are devastated as a result.

      The corporations just close up shop, the golden parachutes protect the owners and their hangers-on. Everyone else just falls straight to the ground without a shred of support. Even worse, you will see the displaced workers demonized and degraded. Not only no help, but brutal castigation from is what you can expect if you are so affected.

      I call it "irresponsible progress."

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    48. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I live you wouldn't have gotten opiates in both cases. Ibuprofen in a slightly higher dosis then over-the-counter, if you're lucky. And then for a week max.

      So yes, I think it's quite excessive what you got.

      I live in the Netherlands by the way.

      No, for some severe dental pain ibuprofen or acetaminophen doesn't cut it. I speak from experience. However the dosage period of the opiates should be limited to a few days as you should have accessed proper dental care and antibiotics by then.

      Godel_56 with mod points

    49. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      I don't need friends taking that many, I do.

      I'm a chronic pain sufferer and I take significantly more than that, but that's what happens when your bones have so many bones spurs on them they look like steak knives. Yes, someone that twisted an ankle shouldn't be taking anywhere near that much but you people have NO IDEA how many people in this country are in chronic unrelenting pain for various conditions. Destroyed nerves, damages joints, blown out muscle groups, out of control immune systems. Pain is a common problem.

      The fact is you wouldn't even know if someone around you was on opiate pain treatment. It's highly stigmatized and most people outside an anonymous forum like this wouldn't tell you to save their lives. You probably know several people taking that level of treatment and don't even know it because people with chronic pain usually don't advertise it because of the social stigma.

    50. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1
    51. Re: If I lived in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All this land to farm which is almost certainly owned by other people. Unless you're into collective farms.

    52. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2

      My wife has chronic pain, as does a close friend. I realize the usefulness of opioids or any other pain relieving drug. But I don't think that it's likely that a majority of the people living in any one town all have chronic pain to the level that it requires opioids to treat. That's part of the problem. A doctor hears that someone has a toothache, so might as well give them some opioids because the pharmaceutical manufacturer will pay the doctor for every prescription. They are over-prescribed big time. This is the not the same thing as saying no one needs them. In fact, if they were not over-prescribed then the people who need them would probably have an easier time of getting them. Every person I know who needs and takes prescription medications, especially controlled ones, complain about the process to get what they need.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    53. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      So, if we assume that 10 servings of neo-heroin per day is reasonable, and we extend that to this town of 2,900 people over 10 years, we learn that 20.8 million pills is enough to cover about 570 people at 10 per day. So, what do you think the likelihood is that 20% of the town (women, children, everything) are living in pain that is so bad that it requires 10 opioid pills per day, every day, for 10 years? Is that reasonable? Do you feel like the doctors in this town are just there to help and care for everyone?

      Here's another question: how long does it take to become physically dependent on opioids or risk an overdose? If you're not sure, ask Tom Petty's wife. If your doctor said you need to smoke 10 cigarettes per day, because it's going to help you shit, are you just going to say "yeah, I need help shitting, so getting myself addicted to nicotine in the process is a reasonable tradeoff, and this doctor totally has my well-being foremost in his mind."

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    54. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      It's not the majority, it's the county seat and at 2600 people probably the only town in the entire county large enough to support pharmacy locations. When put in that perspective 900 people out of 26000 in the county isn't as bad and reduces the percentage by a factor of 10. You should also keep in mind that's averaging, a half a dozen stage 4 cancer patients would heavily skew the numbers because the volume of pills they'd be taking would skew the average and mean.

      That's the point most of the rational posters have been trying to make, this is a statistic manipulation by a politician for political gain. From what I've seen of the Hillbilly Heroin epidemic most of the pharmaceuticals were being traffic'd in from out of state (Florida was a major source point for the entire south) and very few were being obtained with valid prescriptions locally. The addicts were buying their pills from local dealers, not going down to the local pharmacy.

      Don't get me wrong, there's always going to be people doctor shopping and trying to abuse the system but their solution to this was to dramatically shut down all pain prescriptions hurting people with real pain and forcing all the addicts onto street drugs instead of pharmaceuticals. In the end the result was shifting the sales to out of country drug cartels with unregulated doses and killing lots and lots of people with those unregulated drugs. If those same people were taking their pharma Oxy they wouldn't be overdosing left and right and there wouldn't be a heroin tainted with fentinyl problem running rampant over the population. The very action to "solve" the drug problem made it 10 times worse. That's what's fucking crazy about this.

      And the best part is the politicians are trying to blame pharmacies for filling prescriptions they were given which may not even be out of line for numbers of pills being dispersed because the politician is cooking the statistic to make it look awful. Drop the outrage and look at this logically. Every solution to "fix the problem" ends up making it worse.

    55. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by TheOldestGit · · Score: 0

      This is absolute Madness!

      I have been given/taken opiates twice in about 30 years.
      A 4 week course with a prolapsed disc, and a single oral shot three months ago after a drain was inserted for a collapsed lung. (that was painful)

      WTF is going on with the best medical system in the fooking universe???

      --
      Having Leeched on /. for years I thought Hmmmmm-Subscribe!
    56. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by fafalone · · Score: 1, Interesting

      An entire town being prescribed them is beyond insane and there is no way you can feasibly make it out to sound like everyone in town -- every man, woman, and child -- needs them.

      Thanks to the overcorrection in opioid prescribing, I know dozens of people who are in extremely severe pain (from injuries fully backed by MRIs etc, so not faking), who were basically told "I know you like playing with your grandchildren, but I'm cutting your dosage so much you'll no longer be able to get out of bed" or "Here's some tylenol to replace your morphine pump, I'm discharging you"... these people then drive hours, sometimes to entirely different states, to find a doctor that hasn't been pressured into sadism. Filling at the nearest pharmacy to the doctor is common.
      What evidence is there that these pharmacies served only the local population? My scenario is the norm for pain doctors and pharmacies that keep enough opiates in stock to always fill scripts right away. Did you have evidence that's not the case here, or like the politicians and drug warriors are you engaging in scapegoating due to opioid hysteria when you don't actually know what life is like for people whose doctors deny them the only medications that make life tolerable? Is making sure the 1-2 in 100 people using their meds recreationally switch to street drugs and OD so much more important?
      You've fallen for propaganda.

    57. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by fafalone · · Score: 2

      You do realize the vast majority of suffering inflicted by opiates is because of the War on Drugs right? Your solution would increase total suffering by at least a couple orders of magnitude. Education, prevention, and treatment are what minimize the harm caused by dangerous drugs. Prohibition maximizes it, and you take it further by inflicting suffering on people who aren't even abusing drugs.
      You're an ignorant sadomoralist of the worst kind, the kind that foolishly believes they're helping. Could you look down at your own young child, dying of cancer, crying from the pain all day and night, and say "Sorry, there's a 1-2% chance you'll start abusing pain meds, and we're obligated to financially destroy you, lock you in a cage as we flush your future down the toilet, and make you play Russian roulette with fentanyl analogs, instead of help you in the event that happens, so just toughen up buttercup!"?

    58. Re: If I lived in West Virginia by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      I have a friend that had his face smashed in on a construction site 30 years ago and has had about 20 operations and various bolts and shit to fix his jaw. He'll take over a dozen pain pills a day, less if he can smoke weed. Some of his doctors wouldn't allow the weed smoking and were old cunts. Myself, I had a really fucked back the other year, and couldn't take 2 expired oxy pills before getting more sick from the pills. That was the most pain of my life as the pills had little to no effect. My grandmother at 3 times my age and less than half my size could take them better than me.

    59. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No opioid that comes as pill is "heavy". They are all quite mild and were specifically designed not to have the euphoric effects of morphine.

    60. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Well, it all depends upon how that tooth was extracted. I once had 2 wisdom teeth extracted and drove more than 2 hours at highway speeds to get home (student and needed them pulled during a dentist visit before going back to school). No real pain, no pain pills at all, although it was suggested that if I needed it, aspirin or ibuprofen that night could be taken. Fast forward a few years, and had 2 more pulled. Or to be more exact, one pulled, one hammered out of my jaw. Literally. Even then, just 5 doses of hydrocodone over 2 days and I was down to ibuprofen. But make no mistake, tooth extraction can vary by light years in pain, even in the same person.

      As for the finger - beats me. Depends upon how it was broken. Minor cracked bone, no problem. Shattered bones? Different story. Not enough detail in either case to make a determination on pain levels, but 30 days of unknown strength pills does seem excessive.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    61. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These people suffered WHILE they worked. Those that weren't so disabled or old that they couldn't leave, have left.

    62. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      once for a tooth extraction and once for a broken finger.

      Yeah. I mean 1 in 3 people suffering that kind of pain yearly? What the fuck?
      By the way why would you take an opiate for a tooth extraction? I've had 6 teeth pulled in my time. I was prescribed an opiate for one of them, but that was done under a general and tore a hole into my sinus wall as well.

    63. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I live in the Netherlands by the way.

      While I just criticized the parent I too currently live in the Netherlands and you guys are nuts for the opposite reason. Yeah I think 1 in 3 people getting opiates is excessive. But likewise is the Dutch approach to pain management. Doctors aren't even able to write out a prescription for pseudoephedrine here because it's not a registered drug, yet it's available over the counter in all bordering countries. Codeine requires a prescription too and you don't normally get a prescription for anything, including surgery.

      That said the Americans thought I was crazy coming out from surgery without a prescription and being told to get some Panadol Ultra (Paracetamol and Codeine) over the counter. Mind you the thinking was: If I needed anything tougher than that for pain management then I was not ready to be discharged from hospital yet.

    64. Re: If I lived in West Virginia by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but in rural areas, thereâ(TM)s typically one town that serves as a hub for a vast swath of the area around it. The 2000 residents of the town were probably the minority of people using that town to fill their prescriptions (and buy groceries, household goods, etc.).

      And thatâ(TM)s without even discussing whether that town served as a regional distribution hub. I donâ(TM)t know how prescription drug distribution networks work, but it seems plausible that one distributor would be responsible for acquiring supplies for other smaller shops in a region.

      I agree that this sounds like statistics being abused to evoke an emotional response.

    65. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is an extreme reach and you know it

    66. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Deliverance was set in Georgia, not West Virginia.

      Different state, same demographic.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    67. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      "They often have expiration dates slated for 90 days"

      A little searching found that hydrocodone ... Once they have been removed from the originally factory sealed bottle and exposed to the elements, then the expiration date is one year. If they are still in the original factory sealed bottle, then the expiration date is 3 years from the date of manufacture.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    68. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll shit your pants when you see what happens to stock prices and revenue when we get babies addicted as earlier as possible.

      I wish! I take up to three pills per day of opioid painkillers. I have at least two more days before I shit again.

    69. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Personally I'd like to do away with all prescription opiates... it would be better that men would have to struggle and work to get by again. The biggest problem in these regions is lack of purpose. Men need work. One thing we have in WV and KY is plenty of soil to grow crops in.

      Ah yes, just what you need to get people off pain killers. Long hours of back breaking labour. Kudos, sir. You must be a very stable genius.

      What exactly is your solution for the women? Constant pregnancy and housework you say? Brilliant.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    70. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by fafalone · · Score: 1

      If you think that's a reach then you've obviously never dealt with pain management patients. I have, for 15 years. Even before the crackdown on doctors, good pain doctors were exceptionally hard to find. You talk to people in the lobby, majority are from hours away. Then, what pharmacy will have stock? Most people will go to the ones known for handling patients from pain management practices, because normal pharmacies often don't keep enough on hand (and timely filling is critical because there's no extras allowed so you'll get sick if it's wait til tomorrow). It's not a reach, it's the norm, especially post-crackdown, and I find the idea these pharmacies served exclusively in town customers absurd. As would everyone needing more than a few percs from their GP so had to find a pain specialist, people that account for the bulk of pills.
      Pray you never have to find out how hard it is to get treatment for severe chronic pain.

    71. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      "The "chronic pain" they address cannot outweigh the suffering they inflict on communities. "

      What an idiotic thing to say. You try to live in constant agony, and say that. My own mother is on these for multiple pain issues...knees, hip, neck, back. Without some kind of serious pain management, a lot of these folks would be suicidal.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    72. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by fafalone · · Score: 1

      These pharmacies served a regional hospital and in all likelihood a pain management practice, which people from all over the state and even other states would be coming to. It's extremely hard for people in severe chronic pain to find a good pain specialist. Some people have a legit need for lots of opiates, and a doctor willing to prescribe them, even when clearly medically justified, is so rare that they'll attract patients statewide. Then they'll want to fill right away at a pharmacy prepared for the volume, since many don't stock large quantities and waiting on an order means withdrawal. The idea that all these pills were for exclusively in town patients is exceptionally unlikely, and all the people making that assumption are very unfamiliar with the realities of chronic pain patients and the large obstacles and hoops to jump through to get treatment these days. What I described is the exact scenario I've seen over and over in 15 years dealing with chronic pain, so would definitely explain this story. A bit less dramatic than the entire tiny town getting all the pills, but the politicians and media with their opioid hysteria aren't usually telling the whole story-- and refuse to acknowledge what the panic has done to the people who really need these drugs.

    73. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are just trolling, right?

      Two thirds of the town has been taking daily doses of opioids for a decade? That sounds reasonable to you?

      How many people do you know that are taking opioid pain killers? How about just among your immediate family. How many of your family members have been taking daily doses of opioids for a decade?

      Wow. No wonder The Donald is president.

      #MakeAmericaStupidAgain

    74. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by barrygrommit · · Score: 1

      Do you have any friends taking 2 opiate pills 3 times per day, at least that you know of?

      Yes. Me. Twice:
      First for a back issue: oxycodone 3 x/day. Later switched to tramadol when the oxy started to get, well, really really good.
      Second for a shoulder injury: opiate 2x/day, plus lidocaine patch, plus 4 ibuprofen 4x/day. The pain had peaked so intensely that I could not sleep for 5 days straight.

    75. Re: If I lived in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep i had hip and knee total replacemets 6 months apart. Other than hospital issued oxy hydro i have all but 3 of my original oxy and hydrocodone left. Probably expired. Ah I do have 800 mg ibuprofen take maybe 1 to 2 a week.

    76. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by vandamme · · Score: 1

      I had dental surgery recently (tooth extraction) and got a codeine scrip. After two pills, and the pain from the surgery went down, I threw them out and went to the OTC stuff.

    77. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by vandamme · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I found that out after my hernia operation.

    78. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by vandamme · · Score: 1

      Abortion is not "health care".

    79. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      No shit, put away your straw man. I'm not talking about abortion. I'm talking about what happens after the baby leaves the vagina and every so-called "conservative" who believes in the "sanctity of life" decides that since that child is out of its mother it does not deserve health care it cannot pay for, it does not deserve an education it cannot pay for, and if it's born poor then fuck it. Oh, but life is so "sacred", so let's make sure to force every woman to give birth, but those sacred lives can go fuck themselves because we don't need no socialist health care. It's hypocritical bullshit, it's all over the place in both political parties but especially onerous when it comes to this particular issue. It's religious zealotry masquerading, very poorly, as some bullshit political position. Religious zealotry has no place in the US government.

      I would believe so-called "pro-life" people were consistent if their "sanctity of life" extended to all living things instead of only unviable fetuses, but once that kid gets pushed out they think that little fucker better get to work if it wants health care and a decent chance at life. Their "sanctity" ends when they can't force women to do what they want them to do.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    80. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Cool story bro. I had wisdom teeth removed and was given a prescription for I don't even remember what, and I never took a single pill. We rule!

      Not sure what the point of this little anecdote is, but I'm pretty sure we rule!

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    81. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      When put in that perspective 900 people out of 26000 in the county isn't as bad and reduces the percentage by a factor of 10. You should also keep in mind that's averaging, a half a dozen stage 4 cancer patients would heavily skew the numbers because the volume of pills they'd be taking would skew the average and mean.

      I understand that, but the question is whether or not it's reasonable. Yes, I'm sure there are several people in chronic pain who need the medication. Yes, I'm sure certain patients with legitimate short-term needs of huge amounts of opiates exist. But we're talking about over 10 years. If you have chronic pain for 10 years you need surgery, not a lifetime of pills.

      and very few were being obtained with valid prescriptions locally.

      Indeed, so the per-pill-per-person average goes up when you factor in the black market over 10 years in addition to the 20.8 million pills shipped to 2 pharmacies.

      And the best part is the politicians are trying to blame pharmacies

      I don't think the pharmacies are the ones being blamed, I think the focus is on doctors who are prescribing opiates to people who either do not need or specifically should not be taking them.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    82. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      That sounds shitty. I hope you were able to get the medication you legitimately needed.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    83. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      If you have chronic pain for 10 years you need surgery, not a lifetime of pills.

      Here's something no one told me when I started getting chronic pain. Depending on the problem, Surgery effectiveness is often so low it's not even worth the risk because if it fails like it often does it will only make the pain WORSE. For example I had bone spurs surgically removed from each shoulder. I did so only because I became concerned the spurs were tearing the rotator cuff (something that cannot be fixed if it's torn).

      The resulting scar tissue from the arthroscopic surgery causes _constant_ pain for me but I can lift my hands above my head now. There's about a 60% chance those same bone spurs will grow right back. At least so far I'm in the lucky 40%. Depending on the problem the surgical effectiveness can be even lower, there are several kinds of back pain where surgery has an effectiveness rate of less than 10% and often in those cases surgery will make it worse if you aren't in that 10%.

      Allow me to offer some advice, you don't understand chronic pain and likely never will unless you get to experience it yourself. Stop judging others when you haven't walked a mile in their shoes. I've been to more doctors than I can count as have almost all chronic pain patients. We seek solutions, we do the research and in most cases there is no solution, no treatment and no effective drugs. That's the reality of chronic pain, you are left with pain and no answer to solving the pain only treating it's symptoms or committing suicide and neither option is a good option.

      Anyone with chronic pain would being lying if they told you they hadn't considered suicide, because that's how bad the pain is. I even made the decision at one point how I would do it. Have you ever been in so much pain you started fantasizing about suicide? Do you think you are capable of judging the actions of someone in that situation? Or are you so devoid of empathy you can't understand it at all till you experience it first hand?

    84. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Allow me to offer some advice, you don't understand chronic pain and likely never will unless you get to experience it yourself. Stop judging others when you haven't walked a mile in their shoes.

      OK, step down from your cross, Jesus. No one is crucifying you. I don't know what you think this conversation is about, but it's not about whether or not people who have chronic pain should take pain killers, of any kind.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    85. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The "chronic pain" they address cannot outweigh the suffering they inflict on communities." - Excuse me? One has nothing to do with the other. Blaming patients who need these medications for the bad choices, and addictions, of those who don't, is like blaming all car owners for the actions of drunk drivers.

      Unless you have "walked in the shoes" of someone who suffers from chronic pain, you have no right to make that statement.

    86. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      You're the jackass that made the comment:

      Yes, I'm sure certain patients with legitimate short-term needs of huge amounts of opiates exist. But we're talking about over 10 years. If you have chronic pain for 10 years you need surgery, not a lifetime of pills.

      If you want to be an unsympathetic dick head and personally attack me and everyone else in chronic pain you better be fucking prepared to be called out on it instead of being a whiny little bitch because you can't stand a hard discussion about facts. I stand by my comment, you don't know what the fuck you are talking about and like most people think you're a fucking expert on the subject. As I suggested far earlier in the thread you should shut your fucking mouth until you've personally experienced chronic pain. You don't even understand the problem let alone any type of solution to it.

      This town is at the center of mine country, there are likely hundreds of people in permanent chronic pain (and NO SURGERY ISN'T A SOLUTION) in a town of 2,600 let alone a county of 26,000 where these are the primary pharmacies serving the area and that doesn't even include cancer patients. Your bullshit judgements of these people are asinine and just plain unacceptable. I don't know what it is about pain medicine that makes everyone such judgemental pricks but maybe you should think about this superiority complex you've demonstrated, swallow a humility pill and shut the fuck up.

      The solution to a drug problem isn't to attack the only legitimate source of pain relief for hundreds of patients and get it shut down.

    87. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      If you want to be an unsympathetic dick head and personally attack me and everyone else in chronic pain you better be fucking prepared to be called out on it instead of being a whiny little bitch because you can't stand a hard discussion about facts.

      Easy there pal, I'm not the dude fucking your wife. I'm just suggesting that surgery is generally the long-term answer for chronic pain. I'm not aware of that opinion being some kind of unsympathetic personal attack on everyone in chronic pain omg , it's just a simple statement that for a lot of people in chronic pain, a surgical procedure is probably better than a lifetime of opiates. Not exactly a fringe opinion or anything to get your panties in a twist about. And, if you think this is me being whiny, well I don't know what to tell you.

      About the rest of your post - you're obviously not interested in a discussion. You're super pissed about something that has nothing to do with me and I guess this is your outlet, so hope you feel better now. If not, maybe a couple dozen pills per day will fix that problem of yours.

      The solution to a drug problem isn't to attack the only legitimate source of pain relief for hundreds of patients and get it shut down.

      We're in total agreement on that. Maybe you don't understand me or my position. Regardless, glad you got your little rant out.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    88. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Which as I've already told you is exactly why you should just keep your opinions to yourself. You're wrong and you don't understand and you think you know better than everyone else what the answer is probably because you watched something on TV and are now the expert.

      Life is not a cookie cutter system where the same solution works everywhere. Surgery isn't always effective and depending on the type of chronic pain it often can make it worse, far far worse. Conditions like bone spurs are often made worse by surgery and surgeries to improve things like back pain and damaged spinal columns have ridiculously low success rates even with the best surgeon in the world.

      You're super pissed about something that has nothing to do with me and I guess this is your outlet, so hope you feel better now. If not, maybe a couple dozen pills per day will fix that problem of yours.

      I'm not pissed about anything, I'm responding to you about not getting the point that you don't know it all and that your understanding and suggestion of solutions is uninformed and dangerous. You are ignorant of the subject and keep repeating the same bullshit over and over and your suggestions about how to fix things like chronic pain are improper and if anyone is stupid enough to believe them they could make some seriously misinformed choices.

      If not, maybe a couple dozen pills per day will fix that problem of yours.

      Yet another demonstration of your ignorance and exactly explains your worldview, everyone that uses opiates to relieve pain is a drug addict and surgery can fix all problems. Take comfort in the fact that your opinions are right up there with Jeff Sessions and the other hypocrites in Congress that think they know it all too, maybe you and he should have a drink and talk about how much you both know about everything. I'm sure your know-it-all attitude will allow you to bond.

      My prayer to end the conversation, May God let you experience real chronic pain someday as Karma for your stupidity and judgement of others. Cheers.

    89. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      You were given pain relief pills for a tooth extraction? I was slated for all 4 wisdoms to be extracted at age 13, walked from school up to the dentist and went under the gas. The anaesthetist got the doses wrong and I woke up (but felt nothing) as they pulled the first. I felt them pulling the second. As they pulled the third, I thrashed about and managed to hit the dentist, at which point they realised there was something wrong and stopped treatment. I spat the blood, exercised my muffled and very lightweight collection of swear words, then walked back to school for the afternoon with an appointment for having the fourth tooth pulled. They did that one under the needle instead of gas.

      Painkillers for use at home? Don't make me laugh!

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    90. Re:If I lived in West Virginia by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Yes, someone that twisted an ankle shouldn't be taking anywhere near that much but you people have NO IDEA how many people in this country are in chronic unrelenting pain for various conditions.

      And this is the country whose president is lecturing us about the failings of our medical system.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Hell yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a party!

    1. Re:Hell yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like the intentional subjugation of people with opiates.

      Chine fought two wars with Britain in hopes of keeping them from selling Indian opium to the Chinese. They failed

      We are fooling ourselves if we think that Purdue Pharmaceuticals and all of the other companies that our government has given the right to addict the populace will go away quietly, or allow their profits to be limited.

      We will need to be prepared to fight to keep these leeches from getting every one of our friends and families addicted to their garbage

    2. Re:Hell yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      replace "opiates" with guns, and "Purdue" with S&W

      aka dont tread on my high motherfucker

    3. Re:Hell yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They subjugated themselves by clinging to the dying coal industry. The opiates aren't for physical pain. They're to kill the memories of sucking greasy coal boss dick.

  3. Almost Heaven, West Virginia by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What gets me about cases like this is how LONG it took to find the pharmacy pushing out 20E6 pills or the individual doctor prescribing hundreds of thousands a year. Yes, the do pop up now and again, but these drugs are tightly controlled. I have to fill out a triplicate form to get a couple of morphine ampules for our ambulances.

    Does anybody actually LOOK at those forms. If I ordered 5000 ampules would anyone notice?

    Asking for a friend.....

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    1. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by 110010001000 · · Score: 4, Funny

      It wasn't detected until AI deep learning software was invented this year.

    2. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by jebrick · · Score: 5, Informative

      Most of this came abut due to the Congress neutering the Law enforcement (DEA) on behest of the Drug Companies that product the opioids.

      https://www.cbsnews.com/news/e...

      Look up Joe Rannazzisi. Former DEA chief prosecutor

      JOE RANNAZZISI: If I was gonna write a book about how to harm the United States with pharmaceuticals, the only thing I could think of that would immediately harm is to take the authority away from the investigative agency that is trying to enforce the Controlled Substances Act and the regulations implemented under the act. And that's what this bill did.

      The bill, introduced in the House by Pennsylvania Congressman Tom Marino and Congresswoman Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, was promoted as a way to ensure that patients had access to the pain medication they needed.

      Jonathan Novak, who worked in the DEA's legal office, says what the bill really did was strip the agency of its ability to immediately freeze suspicious shipments of prescription narcotics to keep drugs off U.S. streets -- what the DEA calls diversion.

    3. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AI was never needed. Join where sorted by zipcode, pharmacy id, prescribes id.
      I know SQL is not used anymore, but hey employ just one smart employee with a real IT degree.

    4. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by pr0fessor · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They were shipped to two pharmacies in the small town but is also county seat and has the only hospital in the county. They are forgetting that this town with the only hospital serves other communities inside and outside that county of 26,000+ people.

    5. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of this came abut due to the Congress neutering the Law enforcement (DEA) on behest of the Drug Companies that product the opioids.

      Let's also remember that it was selective neutering. Creating the worlds largest legalized opium den is perfect for capitalism, but let's make damn fucking sure that we keep the "evil weed" on the Schedule-1 list.

    6. Re: Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hospitals tend to have their own pharmacies and do not buy their supply from your local drugstore.

    7. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm still having a hard time deciding which side of the fence I'm on here.

      When I'm presented with the choice of:

      A) Having access to the medications I'm legit prescribed by my surgeon or doctor, while abusers of the same drugs also have easy access to them
      and
      B) Not having access to the medications I'm legit prescribed and living in agony, while abusers of those drugs still maintain easy access to them

      I find it very difficult to support "B"

      As someone who recently had open heart surgery and could only get my initial five day prescription filled followed by my second five day refill being delayed a very miserably long three extra days and having to go without pain relief - I frankly don't at all care what law enforcement wants when their desires result in people immediately out of major surgery are left in agony with no other recourse than wasting (in essence) the ERs time and resources to deal with a problem that shouldn't exist and has a well laid out plan to manage.

      Especially combined with the fact that only 4 or 5 less people out of 100 are able to abuse those drugs as a result.

      However even if they could promise and follow through on claiming the reverse, that is preventing 95% of the abusers instead of just 5%, the cost of that is simply far too high.

      Laws and enforcement isn't the right answer to this problem in the first place.
      Laws that result in people out of major surgery being in agony are not an answer to anything.

      A very small part of me almost wishes for people who support these laws, and people tasked with enforcing them such as those at the DEA, would get to experience some major surgery that involves their body sliced open and bones sawed apart and sent home with no pain relief, just so they are personally connected to and aware of exactly what they are doing to other human beings.
      Yet far more so than that, I wish they actually just spontaneously developed the human ability of empathy instead, as no one deserves to experience such a thing.

    8. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Most of this came about because of the War on Drugs, not in spite of it. If you let the government be the gatekeeper of what people put in their bodies, then the government had better be damn good at it. People will clearly abdicate personal responsibility to authority (of the government and their doctor). However, I happen to think a wiser course of action would be to legalize all drugs and sell them in a controlled fashion to anyone who wants them. You want to buy hydrocodone? You got it. You want to buy heroin? You got it. You want to buy cocaine? You got it. We can use taxes to steer people towards safer drugs by making them cheaper than the more dangerous drugs (it would be much better if every heroin addict had access to a safer opiate like suboxone or even hydrocodone which is much safer). We take all the money saved from enforcement, incarceration and the courts system and invest in educational and treatment programs. Oh and as a side effect we neuter a good many gangs that are supported through the drug trade. Criminalizing drug addiction might feel good to all those authoritarians out there (on both sides of the isle), but it simply doesn't make much sense. We've got almost 100 years of proof in this country alone.

    9. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 2

      Speaking as a somewhat local, I wish you were correct, but majority of those pills were abused.

    10. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by gtall · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nothing Marsha Blackburn supports has a bright side.

    11. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I'm not local to West Virginia but I do live in a small town that has the only hospital in the county and even for some small towns in neighboring counties it's still the closest hospital. It makes our hospital busy all the time.

    12. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A) Having access to the medications I'm legit prescribed by my surgeon or doctor, while abusers of the same drugs also have easy access to them
      and
      B) Not having access to the medications I'm legit prescribed and living in agony, while abusers of those drugs still maintain easy access to them

      Rather false dichotomy. You can have stricter controls and making it slightly more difficult for doctors to prescribe. That does mean some people might have more trouble getting it, but you may also end up with a bunch of people who are better off when unnecessarily prescribed something they didn't actually need.

      I'm reminded of legislation that dealt with over-fertilization of farms along a river I grew up on. The farmers yelled about how they needed that fertilizer to keep up yields, while the fishing industry was almost completely dead. After some careful research and well justified limits were established, the yield didn't change, the farmers got the revenue while spending less on fertilizer, and fish started coming back. Turns out they were using as much fertilizer as they could manage in the hopes it would help when it didn't. Maybe likewise we should be carefully studying how much painkillers make a difference (there are already studies that heavy opioids don't make a difference in many situations), and use them more carefully instead of spray and pray.

      A very small part of me almost wishes for people who support these laws, and people tasked with enforcing them such as those at the DEA, would get to experience some major surgery that involves their body sliced open and bones sawed apart and sent home with no pain relief, just so they are personally connected to and aware of exactly what they are doing to other human beings.

      I've had three surgeries in the last decade, including one from a car accident, and in all cases I was prescribed opioid painkillers. I only used them for two days before being sent home after one surgery, and in the other two cases i denied them. That didn't mean "no pain relief," as I was still given strong versions of OTC pain killers, and I still had the option of changing my mind. I would not describe my pain tolerance as above average either. But without much regard for the severity of surgery, I potentially given a two week supply of heavy duty stuff and told to use as long as I needed over those two weeks without consultation on what is "need" vs. when to switch to a different painkiller.

    13. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Solandri · · Score: 1
      According to your link, that bill didn't become law until 2016. Opioid overdose deaths began to skyrocket in 2013, long before the bill was even written.

      Based on your link, the more likely culprit was lobbying by pharmaceutical companies getting the bigwigs at the DEA to change enforcement policies.

      In 2011, more than 17,000 Americans died from opioid prescription overdoses. That same year Cardinal Health, the second largest distributor, started pushing back at Joe Rannazzisi. The companies' attorneys went over his head and called his bosses at the Justice Department, who called in Rannazzisi to have him explain his tactics.

      JOE RANNAZZISI: And it in-- infuriated me that I was over there, trying to explain what my motives were or why I was going after these corporations? And when I went back to the office, and I sat down with my staff, I basically said, "You know, I just got questioned on why we're doing-- why we're doing what we're doing. This is-- this-- this is-- now this is war. We're going after these people and we're not going to stop.
      [...]
      Rannazzisi says the drug industry used that money and influence to pressure top lawyers at the DEA to take a softer approach. Former DEA attorney Jonathan Novak said it divided the litigation office. He said in 2013, he noticed a sea change in the way prosecutions of big distributors were handled. Cases his supervisors once would have easily approved, now weren't good enough.

    14. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      --Whoosh!
      select * from lame_ass_slashdot_comments
      where user_id = 'anonymous'
      and comment_title like '%Almost Heaven%'
      and comment_snark_level = 'high'
      and commenter_is_a_pompous_ass is not null
      ;

    15. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were shipped to two pharmacies in the small town but is also county seat and has the only hospital in the county. They are forgetting that this town with the only hospital serves other communities inside and outside that county of 26,000+ people.

      They can just check if the amount of painkillers is out of proportion to other pharmaceuticals delivered to the same customer base. If there are that many more customers, they'll be that much more of every drug.

    16. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The answer is yes, the people making gobs and gobs and gobs and gobs of cash pushing smack have looked at these forms. Yes.

    17. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She is a scumbag on an epic level:
      From WP:

      Blackburn has been closely associated with the telecommunications industry over the course of her career, as of 2017, Blackburn had accepted at least $693,000 in campaign contributions from telecom companies over her 14-year career in Congress.[57][58]

      Blackburn opposes net neutrality in the United States, referring to it as "socialistic".[59]

      Blackburn opposes municipal broadband initiatives that aim to compete with Internet service providers.[60][61]

      She supported bills that restrict municipalities from creating their own broadband networks, and wrote a bill to prevent the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) from preempting state laws that blocked municipal broadband.[62][63]

      In early 2017, Blackburn introduced to the House a measure to dismantle an Obama-administration online privacy rule that had been adopted by the FCC in October 2016.[64] Blackburn's measure, which was supported by broadband providers but criticized by privacy advocates,Template:NPOV statement repealed the rule which required broadband providers to obtain consumers' permission before sharing their online data, including browsing histories.[64][65]

      The measure passed the House in a party-line vote in March 2017, after a similar measure had been passed by the Senate the same week.[64] She subsequently proposed legislation which expanded the requirement to include internet companies as well as broadband providers.[66]

    18. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by DavidHumus · · Score: 4, Funny
      > If I ordered 5000 ampules would anyone notice?

      Well, yeah, now they would. Thanks a lot, West Virginia.

    19. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's so aggravating, the flaming fucking hoops normal people have to go through to get pain meds. They opened my wife's mid section from end to end, then sent her home with ibuprofen. I get tylenol after my tonsillectomy (VERY unpleasant for an adult).

      Then all these pill heads get fist fulls of the stuff to treat a hang nail. I don't get it.

      I think it should all be OTC. Let the problem solve itself.

    20. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by j33px0r · · Score: 1

      A little quick magic math with 26,000 people, I'm sure I'll overlook something:

      75% of population roughly being adults: Down to 19,500 people
      2 million pills a year over 10 years.
      If a person on a prescription was taking 1 pill a day you'd have enough for roughly 5000 people a year or two a day for 2,500, the remainder for general hospital use. Of course, I'm sure that's not how it played out but it seems rather high...harr...

    21. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nothing like a quote from the jack booted thugs in the DEA for how to ruin America.

      You know how you actually ruin America? You put law enforcement in charge of a medical issue. Then they do things like threaten people with jail which cuts the pharmaceutical supplies of a drug with physical addiction issues so the users have to immediately turn to street drugs to reduce withdrawl side effects.

      Then on top of that you stigmatize drug treatment so that seeking help makes you a looser, then add in a little random drug screening at employers so the person gets fired as well.

      Our war on drugs is the most fucked up thing you could EVER do to this country.

    22. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      been there and done that. will take option B anytime.

    23. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by hey! · · Score: 1

      They were shipped to two pharmacies in the small town but is also county seat and has the only hospital in the county.

      208 million divided by a population of 26839 is 7750 pills per person.. Over the course of ten years that's two oxycodone doses per day for every man, woman, child and infant in the county, and that's assuming everyone in the county went to the county seat rather than closer pharmacies in adjacent counties, which include several Walmarts.

      There's really no way to make this even close to reasonable. West Virginia has the highest opioid death rate in the country, 52 deaths per 100,0000, but even so there probably aren't even enough opioid addicts in the vicinity of these pharmacies to absorb all those pills. They must have been funneled into the black market.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    24. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were shipped to two pharmacies in the small town but is also county seat and has the only hospital in the county. They are forgetting that this town with the only hospital serves other communities inside and outside that county of 26,000+ people.

      So, let's do some basic math here ...

      20.8M pills / 26K people = 800 pills for every man woman and child ... that's over 2 a day for the entire populace for over a year.

      So, assume only half the populace ...

      20.8M pills / 13K people ... that's 1600 pills for each of that half of the population ... that's 2 pills a day for 13K people for 2 years.

      Maybe some less crazy numbers, let's go with a quarter of the populace (6500 people)

      20.8 million pills / 6.5K people ... that's 3200 pills for every one of the quarter of the population ... two a day for 4 years.

      No matter how you cut it, that just seems like WAY too many pills for that population. Yes, this was a 10 year span, but what fraction of the populace has a prescription for opiods??

      I'm betting if you add up all the legitimate prescriptions and the number of pills for each, this is still way the hell off.

      The problem is the pharma companies have been pushing these things like candy, claiming they're not addictive, and paying off doctors to write a scrip for anyone who come in the door.

      The implausibility of those numbers is staggering.

    25. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      It depend on the dose. Low dose hydrocodone 5/325 used for pain management after injury is 1 to 2 pills every 4-6 hours max of 8 a day and would be the most commonly prescribed.

    26. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by swb · · Score: 2

      I think you have to look at the down side of extremely restrictive prescriptions in terms of what it does in the illegal drug market.

      Tightening of prescription opiates started happening BEFORE the current overdose crisis and I think drove a lot of more casual pill users to heroin as street prices for pills creeped up. A surge in heroin users and the short-term supply inelasticity of heroin means the market adapts -- hard-to-interdict synthetics from China get turned loose, either on its own or to pump up overly diluted heroin.

      So now you have not only a lot of inexperienced heroin users, you have a lot of bad heroin as a result of mostly just tightening down the prescription pill supply.

      My sense was that the DEA probably needed to clamp down on the high-dosage pill supply (Oxycontin 30 mg and larger, for example) while mostly tolerating a certain level of abuse and diversion in the low-dosage pill market (your extremely common 5 mg oxycodone and hydrocodones, like Percocet and Vicodin).

      While you certainly will have some problems with this -- those with addictive tendences will probably escalate. That being said, the recreational abusers and the overprescribed will be inclined to stick with reliable, relatively low doses, and many will not develop addiction at all let alone overdose. The history of opium has demonstrated that a lot of addicts wind up being maintenance addicts, people who are addicted but maintain their consumption at levels that are long-term sustainable.

      The counter to this (existing policy) just seems to cause a lot of problems. Way more black market opiates of unknown quantities, much higher overdose rates, and policy makers making patient care for people with legitimate uses of opiates much more difficult.

    27. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not 208 million pills. It's 20.8 million pills.

      For a population of 2900 people, across 10 years, it works out to 1.9 pills per day per person.

      If you spread it across the whole county, it drops to a lot less.

      20,800,000 / 26,839 / 10 / 365 = 0.2 pills per person per day.

    28. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to know a few people involved in the black market for pharmaceuticals. They would show up with these giant bottles of 500 tablets that pharmacies dispense from. I'm not sure how that worked since I would assume inventory control would flag the missing items and someone would review surveillance footage. Maybe I'm just naive, and it's treated as shrinkage and no one really cares?

      How many people are dying from pharmaceutical grade opiates? I was under the impression they were dying from counterfeit products that were made using fentanyl and carfentanil.

    29. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by plopez · · Score: 1

      There are 7 pharmacies in that town.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    30. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by plopez · · Score: 1

      Now factor in there are 7 pharmacies in the town itself.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    31. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by hey! · · Score: 2

      In 2016. opioid overdoses claimed 64,000 lives. That's like a 9/11 attack every 17 days. It's like terrorists wiping out a city the size of Topeka KS every two years. It's amazing to me that anything else is news while something this big is going on, and our politicians are literally doing nothing about it.

      Oh, last year Congress allocated a billion dollars in block grants to be spent over two years, but I have seen what dropping these kinds of hot potato money bombs on state public health agencies does: it just ends up lining the pockets of politically connected contractors. Give a state agency currently operating on a shoestring ten million dollars it has to spend by the end of the year and it won't even have the manpower to oversee that much spending while doing the other things it has to do.

      In one case I know of a state public health agency spent a million dollars on a public reporting website that the state's own internal IT people told me they'd have charged back $10,000 for. But they had to spend the money immediately, and so they turned to one of the very few contractors capable of absorbing that much federally encumbered money on such short notice. And because those contractors maintain substantial Washington lobbying presence they were probably ready to take the hot potato off the agency's hand before the agency knew it was coming.

      A serious effort to spend 20 million dollars in a state on this problem would give them that money over ten years to be spent at whatever pace they could manage effectively. That would do far more for the people working closest to the problem. Hot potato funding is just a gift to the congressens' political cronies.

      In any case a billion dollars is peanuts. We spent trillions in response to 9/11, and even reorganized the Executive Branch, all for what is in comparison a minor event.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    32. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by hey! · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. But one of those pharmacies got 9 million pills in two years. Given that there are larger pharmacies just across the river from it, it's still pretty damned ridiculous.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    33. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SQL Warning, query returned empty record set.

    34. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Her B.S is in home economics, bitch better get back in that kitchen, my sandwich isn't gonna make itself!

    35. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nothing Marsha Blackburn supports has a bright side.

      Marsha Blackburn supports incandescent light bulbs. Idiotic? Maybe. But you can't claim it doesn't have a bright side.

    36. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by fafalone · · Score: 1

      Youre assuming people in surrounding areas have pharmacies and doctors that will treat pain. Many pain patients have to drive hours to find a doctor who will help them, then fill scripts right there. I lived it every month for years. They almost certainly served the entire state, maybe others.

    37. Re: Almost Heaven, West Virginia by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      But they only give you medication while you're in the hospital. So if you come in with a trauma, they will load you up with morphine. But at some point you get sent home with a prescription. After I had my wisdom teeth out, my dentist told me to get the script filled immediately and take one right away rather than waiting until I felt discomfort (presumably because the medicine takes time to work). So if you have a lot of people leaving the hospital with a long drive home, they could be filling their scripts on the way. Although I'm guessing that there was also a lot of abuse here.

    38. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      Until they investigate the prescriptions and where the people come from there really isn't anything we can say other than having the only hospital in the area makes it the center of medical care.

    39. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      I got a prescription for hydrocodone after some dental work, plus an antibiotic. I headed to the drugstore, which I wasn't familiar with since I normally go to my medical foundation's pharmacy. Didn't have an "insurance card" and I wasn't in their system. So they looked at me suspiciously.

      However, the hydrocodone they were fine with, but I had to wait around a couple hours (in pain) while they phoned back and forth to see if I was allowed to get the antibiotic.

    40. Re: Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Yes, for in house use, or your first prescription while being discharged. The majority of refills will happen at an outside pharmacy.

    41. Re: Almost Heaven, West Virginia by jittles · · Score: 2

      After I had my wisdom teeth out, my dentist told me to get the script filled immediately and take one right away rather than waiting until I felt discomfort (presumably because the medicine takes time to work).

      They recommend that you take all pain meds (opiod or otherwise) prior to actually needing the dose. They say that they're more effective if you take them before the pain gets to its worst.

    42. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      Most of this came abut due to the Congress neutering the Law enforcement (DEA) on behest of the Drug Companies that product the opioids.

      Good. Why on earth do you think law enforcement officers should be making decisions about drugs instead of doctors and pharmacists? That's simply absurd.

    43. Re: Almost Heaven, West Virginia by M0j0_j0j0 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and now with support of bigint for these special high value cases

    44. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by cnaumann · · Score: 1

      And alcohol probably claimed 88,000 lives. That is not news either.

    45. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by hey! · · Score: 1

      Yes, and a half million people will die from cancer.

      The issues isn't deaths, the issue is preventable deaths.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    46. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I actually don't believe in requiring prescriptions for any drugs - they should all be legalized. I get that some people have no self control and will end up killing themselves, but history, w.r.t. other drugs and other countries has shown using government resources on education and drug treatment programs is more effective.

      I had two shoulder surgeries. I knew the problems with the the hydrocodone I was prescribed. I stretched out my prescription from 1 week to 2 by only taking it at night so that I could sleep and still drive to work the next day without being a danger to people around me. When I asked for more, after two weeks, the doctor looked at me like I just grew horns on my head and was the devil himself. The issue was I was still in a great deal of pain. I used all my allotted physical therapy sessions and still wasn't better. So I didn't get the other shoulder done for years because I asked what the point was if it was still just going to hurt.

      Then I found out from a new orthopedist that the first one didn't remove enough bone. The pain wasn't in my head.

      On a different note, my son had to take inhaler using a pediatric inhaler tube. My dog found it one night and chewed it up - the tube, yes, the TUBE, requires a prescription. We were on vacation, and it was a nightmare.

      Then when had a bout of conjunctivitis, we KNEW EXACTLY what we needed, but still had to go to the doctor, wasting their time, our time, money, just to get a prescription for what we already knew we needed. I'm not suggesting people always diagnose themselves, but sometimes it's really obvious and really annoying to wait hours or days to see a doctor when you could just go buy something at the pharmacy immediately and start treating your problem. I'm not suggesting people not see their doctors, I'm saying sometimes you really don't need them.

      It's not "deregulation," I think the FDA should still evaluate drugs and the claims of the companies, but a prescription is to tell you what the doctor thinks you be taking, it shouldn't be REQUIRED to take something.

      I mean, WTF? They look at you like a criminal just for buying cold medication with Pseudoephedrine.

      I'm sorry that other people would be idiots and kill themselves, but natural selection is important to the survival of humankind.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    47. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      Yes, and a half million people will die from cancer.

      The issues isn't deaths, the issue is preventable deaths.

      Are you trying to say that deaths due to alcohol aren't preventable, while deaths due to opiods are? For that matter, even many deaths from cancer are preventable (or at least deferrable... which amounts to the same thing in the end if you can defer it long enough) with early enough detection and proper treatment.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    48. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But on the other hand, the money goes to real pharmaceutical companies, may be US based, and maybe they pay taxes even, and not some Mexican drug cartel, so it not all bad.
      Those pharmaceutical companies are also nice enough to give moeny to PAC's, reelection funds, and lobbyists.
      Whats the problem? Who's buying this shit anyway?

    49. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust me on this the majority of those pills were abused.

    50. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure your small town is much different than small towns in southern West Virginia.

    51. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by hey! · · Score: 1

      I'm saying that a substantial fraction of opioid deaths could be stopped by monitoring situations like the one we're discussing, where a ridiculous number of doses are shipped to a couple tiny pharmacies. One pharmacy got nine million doses of Oxycontin in just two years.

      It's easy to check if that's even possibly reasonable. If that same pharmacy also got 150 million doses of statin (a class of blood pressure medication taken by 60% of Americans) then it's just a popular pharmacy. But if its ordering more Oxycontin than statin, it's a virtual certainty that nearly all of those nine million doses went to junkies.

      And if that's the case, simply auditing pharmacies with unusual volumes of opioid orders would take a huge chunk out of the black market trade. Show me something that simple which would save cancer or alcohol patients and I'm all ears.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    52. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even 0.2 pills per person per day still looks like a lot to me.

      If, say, 10% of the population is on 2 pills per day each - I'd call that a lot.

    53. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by sjames · · Score: 1

      But before the DEA was neutered (somewhat), we had B. Ideally, we would legislate that the DEA behave more reasonably, but you can't legislate that.

      It's great when a person can do OK with less opoids. Some can, some cant. Some surgeries leave more post-op pain than others. What we DON'T need though is cops that practice medicine without a license and decide who needs what without even seeing the patient first. Before the DEA was curbed, they didn't even demonstrate an understanding that it's natural for an oncologist or a pain specialist to prescribe more opoids than a pediatrician.

      I have no idea what your pain tolerance is nor what surgeries you had. You probably have no idea how much GP's surgery hurts or what his pain tolerance is.

      If you can figure out how to do option C, everyone with actual need gets what they need and recreational users get none, I'd love to see your proposal. But absent that, people who need painkillers getting what the need is VASTLY more important than cutting off people who abuse drugs.

    54. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by sjames · · Score: 2

      A real question though is how many of those opoid overdoses happened because users resorted to street drugs of unknown and poorly controlled strength rather than well regulated pharmaceuticals?

    55. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by sjames · · Score: 1

      Note that statins are for cholesterol, not high blood pressure.

      Also, you have to consider the pharmacy. For example, it it's right next to a cancer clinic, it will probably fill a LOT of perfectly legit opoid prescriptions.

    56. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check the road toll while you're at it.

    57. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by sad_ · · Score: 1

      Does anybody actually LOOK at those forms. If I ordered 5000 ampules would anyone notice?

      as with 99.9% of paperwork & reports, nobody looks at them. it is there for a 'cover your ass' reason. in case anything would happen, people can reach to the paperwork/report and say - here is the proof.

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    58. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Agripa · · Score: 1

      The DEA leaving patients with a legitimate need for narcotic painkillers without them and persecuting doctors who were proscribing them to these patients did not help.

      Ultimately this is the fault of Congress and the people who voted for them.

    59. Re: Almost Heaven, West Virginia by edtice1559 · · Score: 1

      Yeah so it seems reasonable that people leaving the hospital went right to the pharmacy to fill their medications.

    60. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 1

      It's a fair question, but there is one important difference between deaths-from-alcohol and deaths-from-opiates: The latter figure has absolutely exploded in the past 17 years, going from 10,000/year in 1990 to 59-65,000 in 2016.* Alcohol-related deaths have also been rising, but at a much more modest pace (37% since 2002, according to one source).

      So it would appear that something big is happening that is specifically affecting opiate-related deaths, and if we can identify what that is, we might be able to prevent a lot of them.

    61. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 1

      Sorry about that asterisk-- I was trying to include a citation, but for some reason this caused Slashdot to scramble my post into an unreadable mess. Here's the citation: https://www.nytimes.com/intera...

    62. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      That sounds much more reasonable. Still, the issue isn't "preventable deaths" since "preventable" is a binary attribute, not a continuum, and in the end most deaths would qualify. Situations where literally nothing could have been done to prevent the death are extremely rare. The real issue is cost vs. benefit—some preventable deaths are more costly to prevent than others. Included in that analysis are other factors beyond the mere number of deaths, many of which have no easy answers; for example, how ought the life of one individual be weighed against the general well-being of many? Is it right to condemn one person, or more likely many, to a life of pain in order to prevent someone else from dying of an overdose? It is a more complex situation than most seem to assume, and I for one remain highly skeptical of any "simple" political solution.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    63. Re:Almost Heaven, West Virginia by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      In 2016. opioid overdoses claimed 64,000 lives.

      No, that was the total for all drugs. Opioids did just, but up to 14,550, from 12,727 in 2015.
      https://www.vox.com/policy-and...

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    64. Re: Almost Heaven, West Virginia by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      What he (parent) said.

      I was in a trauma unit last spring, and given morphine, even though I wasn't in much pain initially due to severe numbness...it was a prophylactic (no, not that kind). My nose was nearly severed from my face. I was sent home the next day (thanks to a great surgeon) with a script for Percocet, and told not to wait for pain to take it. For me, it didn't end up mattering because the nerves are still damaged, leaving me feeling as though the area was injected with Novocain...all the time.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  4. Ironically by DaMattster · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I'll bet it was the Republicans that brought the shit in under the guise of profits over people. I'll bet it was the Republicans that helped to get in to help their wealthy campaign contributers.

    1. Re:Ironically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      Yes, and it was the republicans who passed medicare part B, which forbade the government from negotiating prices for pharmaceuticals...

      So yes, on top of everything else, they made sure that we would pay top dollar to get addicted, which then increases Heroin usage when the addicts can no longer afford these overpriced drugs

  5. They probably weren't all for just that one town by scourfish · · Score: 0

    I'd imagine that many pills made that town a distribution source for the black market.

  6. Maybe this explains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why Trump is nice talk, no action on the opioid crisis. If he took strong action, a lot of his followers would be pissed off.

  7. almost arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asking for a friend.....

    the cops are poking over your facebook feed as we speak

    1. Re:almost arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "the cops are poking over your facebook feed as we speak"

      Please, this is West Virginia. The FBI is busy getting fisted by the White House and the local cops are busy ticketing black people and/or shooting black people, or stealing money from the towns of inbred hookwormed lumps of mashed potatoes that the census calls "inhabitants". Hell, while I was typing this, another West Virginia resident probably drank 12 shots of bourbon, got in their 90s Ford Fiesta, and drove down to the local pharmacy to pick up more oxy that his brother in law wrote the script for.

    2. Re:almost arrested by Onymous+Hero · · Score: 1

      The Ford Fiesta wasn't sold in the USA until 2010 or so...

    3. Re:almost arrested by djbckr · · Score: 1

      The Ford Fiesta wasn't sold in the USA until 2010 or so...

      Not really sure what that has to do with this thread, but I remember the Ford Fiesta my father bought in the 1980's here in the states.

    4. Re:almost arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laughable, the Fiesta, although built in Germany, was available in the US since 1976

      Can't tell if you are a troll or just dumb

    5. Re:almost arrested by Onymous+Hero · · Score: 1

      Yes, the first version sold for three years from 1978 to 1980. It was never sold in the 90s, and only made a reappearance in 2010.

    6. Re:almost arrested by Onymous+Hero · · Score: 1

      It was available for 3 years in the late 70s. There was no 90's Fiesta in the USA.

    7. Re:almost arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      90s Ford FESTIVA...Fiesta went away in the late 80s and came back in the early 2000s. Owned a Festiva back in the day. It was a rebadged KIA and a great little skateboard...I mean car. Had it for almost 10 years til Ford orphaned it.

    8. Re:almost arrested by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      This is definitely a Slashdot thread. We're talking about the prescription opioid epidemic but the history of Ford Fiesta sales in the US do not go unnoticed. You should start those comments with "ackchyually" though to really drive the point home.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    9. Re:almost arrested by Onymous+Hero · · Score: 1

      If you don't get the minutest details correct then how can one trust the rest of your arguments? :P

  8. Re: They probably weren't all for just that one to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Thank you, captain obvious!

    Shit now I need some OxyContin after reading your earnest attempt to say something insightful

  9. Re:Fake news by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 1

    Spoken like a true drug addict.

    --
    Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
  10. Re: Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Codeine is classified as narcotics over here in Europe, so you won't get that OTC. Perhaps in some European countries, but if you bring a single pill into Sweden you face a prison sentence.

  11. Blockchain will fix that. by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Blockchain in the supply chain will fix that. My IBM commercial told me so.

    1. Re: Blockchain will fix that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We already have CSOS and suspicions order monitoring. But Cardinal and the likes prefer not to do it, because you know, it gets in the way of profits. And because having separate states is a shitshow. If a large distributor gets a fine it's about supplying Florida pharmacies from a Distribution center in Florida. There is no ban or fine if they decide to supply them from a distribution center in Georgia or Alabama. Hell Cardinal's CSOS system is violating the law because they take the pharmacists certificates (private keys included) and store them in their own system

    2. Re: Blockchain will fix that. by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      I know. I was there for AS2-based drug pedigrees. How's that working?

  12. It's the American way of life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Everyone has their diagnosis, their pills and their prescriptions. If something doesn't feel right, then you pop a few pills. Maybe you call the lawyer, there's always a chance you can sue someone. Meanwhile, you slowly eat yourself to a premature death. It's the American way of life.

    1. Re:It's the American way of life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That and shooting one another... preferably someone you know/are supposed to love

    2. Re:It's the American way of life by gtall · · Score: 1

      No, everyone does not, and no it isn't the American way of life. Please do get a sense of proportion.

    3. Re:It's the American way of life by blindseer · · Score: 1

      No, the American way of life is shooting yourself. Shooting each other is the national pastime of Venezuela.

      The number of intentional deaths by firearm in the USA is about 10 per 100,000, and the murder rate in the USA is about 5 per 100,000. These numbers do not match unless suicides are being counted as deaths by firearm. About 2/3rds of deaths in the USA by firearm are suicides.

      Venezuela on the other hand see 57 murders per 100,000, and 59 intentional deaths by firearm per 100,000. That only makes sense if a lot of people are shot to death by others.

      Oh, and in America there are enough firearms for every man, woman, child, and household pet to be armed. In Venezuela there's 1 firearm for every 10 people. So, tell me how gun ownership is a problem in the USA again? Pretty sure that it's not the guns killing people in America, it's untreated mental conditions.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    4. Re:It's the American way of life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, so what's the US murder rate like compared to other first world Western democracies?

      Through the roof you say?

      OK, but what's the rate attributable to gun violence compared to other first world Western democracies?

      Through the roof you say?

      Carry on.

    5. Re:It's the American way of life by blindseer · · Score: 1

      You mean like London, England?
      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new...

      Or Paris, France?
      https://crimeresearch.org/2017...

      Pretty sure the problem is not the guns. France has a gun ownership rate of about 30 per 100, and England is about 6 per 100.

      I'm still safer in Austin, Texas than Glasgow, Scotland.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    6. Re:It's the American way of life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, let me guess, you think global warming isn't happening because it's cold in your fridge, right?

      The question was comparing countries, not individual parts of countries. I'd be safer in Oxford than in Chicago, if you really must compare cities. But we're not going to.

    7. Re:It's the American way of life by blindseer · · Score: 1

      If you want to compare countries then compare countries. Why limit the comparison to "first world Western democratic" nations? Can you define "first world", "Western", and "democratic"? Then explain why we are discussing only those nations as opposed to the rest of the world.

      Can you even define "nation"? The USA is a federation of states, each with different laws on gun ownership, different styles of law enforcement, different drug laws, different cultures, different economies. Texas, California, and New York, are very large states separated by great distances. Each state is in many ways are as different or similar to each other as the UK is to Australia or Canada.

      Does "first world Western democracy" define Mexico? Cuba? If not then why not? If so then it sure would be nice if they weren't our neighbors and the federal government wasn't letting the criminals just walk over the borders.

      This will work it's way out in time. I see European "Western democracies" are seeing their own immigrant troubles now. I expect the crime rates to even out in time. Or Europe nations will cease to be "Western" ,or "democratic", or "first world", or perhaps even nations. Whatever problems the USA has it's not the guns. It might be the drugs. It might be the immigrants. Highly likely the immigrants with the drugs. You all in Europe there will see the same, if you don't do something about the immigrants, and the drugs they inevitably bring.

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    8. Re:It's the American way of life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention, how many of those murders are gang related? Or, by previously convicted felons?

  13. Re:They probably weren't all for just that one tow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh come now, that's only 19 pills per day, per person, for ten straight years. Perfectly reasonable, if my ex-wife was any indication.

  14. So lets do some Math. by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Meds Per Person: 22800000.0/2900.0 = 7862.07
    Meds Per Person/Year: 7862.07/10.0 = 786.21
    Meds Per Person/Day: 786.21/365 = 2.15

    Now it is unlikely that the Town is all on these Meds and 2 of these meds a day is very high. I have family suffering from constant pain, and they only use these once a week, in case of extreme pain (And unlike the media, these meds do work), to bring the pain to a manageable level.

    However my main point is the news shoving people with big scary numbers, to really prove a point, but while there is still a problem, the real numbers are not as obvious as the article is lead to believe, as this is over 10 years. Not one big shipment.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:So lets do some Math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You are waaayyy off that 2 a day being very high. True chronic pain sufferers are not prescribed PRN, they are prescribed a fix amount and told to take the full amount every day. (This helps prevent both diversion and abuse, IE; oh today is "bad" I need to take more. No, you get the same amount every day.) Standard dosing for mild chronic suffers is between between 40mg and 60mg per day. The pills have a useful life of around 6 hours each, and most commonly sold in 7.5mg and 10mg doses. That equates to 4 to 10 pills per day for an average chronic pain suffer on a therapeutic dose. Longer acting time released version exist which greatly cut down the number of pills consumed, while still delivering the same dose of medication, however they are more expensive and many insurance companies won't pay for them.

    2. Re:So lets do some Math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But of course he was also likely way over-estimating the number of people in that town actually taking any at all.

    3. Re:So lets do some Math. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      "True chronic pain sufferers are not prescribed PRN"
      That is bit of a generalization (a Very DANGEROUS generalization)

      True chronic pain suffers have different types of pains, and different pain regimes. Being that these are controlled substances, doctors would like to give patients safer alternatives for "normal" pain days. These drugs do not cure Chronic Pain, but makes its bearable for that day. However Chronic Pain isn't a one size fits all diagnosis it is very different for people.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:So lets do some Math. by jruschme · · Score: 1

      That was the same conclusion I came to. The big numbers make it look like a drug oversight crisis. If anything, it is a public health crisis and the real question is why are so many people in one area in such amounts of pain.

    5. Re:So lets do some Math. by Goetterdaemmerung · · Score: 1

      However my main point is the news shoving people with big scary numbers, to really prove a point, but while there is still a problem, the real numbers are not as obvious as the article is lead to believe, as this is over 10 years. Not one big shipment.

      You are right. Without any comparison with other areas' usage it is impossible to draw any legitimate conclusion. If this rural area has the same drug usage as NYC that would mean one thing, however if all rural areas have statistically similar usage that means quite another.

    6. Re:So lets do some Math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, and if you give a person two of these painkillers a day for a year... then you have created an addict.

      When the legal meds run out, they will head for the Heroin and fentanyl (China white) in droves, only to end of dead

      What a happy story, even 'little numbers' add up to death and disgrace

    7. Re:So lets do some Math. by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      And as I pointed out in more detail further down, Williamson is the only town of any size and thus has some of the only pharmacies in that part of the state, so they're serving a lot more people than just the ~3k inside the technical city limits. I'd guess you're looking at more like a pill or two per person per week once you factor that in. Back of the envelope, you probably can get to numbers like that with a fairly small population of heavy users on top of your normal, legitimate baseline volume.

    8. Re:So lets do some Math. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1, Interesting

      And nobody is looking at OTHER nearby towns that may not have pharmacies, or being this is the only town with a Hospital in that county.

      The problem with big numbers, is they can be misleading. Big Numbers over a Long Time look horrible, until you do the math, and then it doesn't look so bad. In fact, it actually starts to look more and more reasonable.

      But hey, lets kneejerk reaction based on large misleading numbers!

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    9. Re:So lets do some Math. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      There is also the possibility that the town is just 2600 numbers, but that this is the place to go to a pharmacy for significantly more people. The given numbers are dishonest.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    10. Re:So lets do some Math. by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      You're way off. My mom has the nerves in her feet destroyed from diabetes, she takes 50mg 3/daily of long-acting hydromorphone. On top of that she takes 325/5mg acet/oxy upto 5/day for breakthrough pain. This isn't uncommon for people who have severe nerve damage, that's even less then what most cancer patients at stage 2 or 3 take for pain control. Even in my case, I take 50-100mg of tramadol, up to 600mg/daily to control pain from when I broke my back. 600mg is where they switch you to long-acting, and then you take *more* pain meds for when the pain breaks through. If people in your family are only taking something once/week for extreme pain, then they're not really in a constant state of pain, or they're having problems paying for the medication and aren't telling you.

      The whole premise of pain management is to have you at a level of pain medication where it will get you through the day at a bearable level. When you get to more specialized treatments like with pain clinics, then you move onto things like nerve blocks, localized site injections, implant pumps for constant release and so on. The amount of pain meds could be even higher then what you were originally taking, or lower. For instance, one of the other medications that I use for pain management is baclofen(muscle relaxant), the option I can have is for a line placed directly into my spine and have a steady stream of it all the time, instead of taking 20mg/2-3 daily.

      I haven't even gotten to the pain medication resistance, and the requirement to switch pain medications every 5-7 years because they become less effective over time.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    11. Re:So lets do some Math. by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 2

      You are assuming that the oxy's were Percocet which would be available in 7.5 and 10mg dosages. A good bit of them were likely Oxycontin which would be anywhere from 10mg to 160mg per pill. They quit making the 160's early on because that's a stupid amount of drug to put in one pill so a lot of them were most likely the 80mg variety until the non crushable version was released, which lead to the intro of and popularity of Opana for a few years until they were also forced to make non crushable, which lead to the intro of heroin to WV.

    12. Re:So lets do some Math. by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

      The problem is two fold. One the coal industry dominates this area of WV and results in a lot of painful injuries. Second those injuries lead to addiction which the drug industry knowingly feeds. Once they get you addicted to the pain pills they keep you addicted under the guise of treatment with Suboxone.

    13. Re:So lets do some Math. by houghi · · Score: 1

      Without telling us what the standard average is, it is still meaningless. That 2.14 is how much of a deviation for these specific drugs?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    14. Re:So lets do some Math. by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Meds Per Person: 22800000.0/2900.0 = 7862.07
      Meds Per Person/Year: 7862.07/10.0 = 786.21
      Meds Per Person/Day: 786.21/365 = 2.15

      Now it is unlikely that the Town is all on these Meds and 2 of these meds a day is very high. I have family suffering from constant pain, and they only use these once a week, in case of extreme pain (And unlike the media, these meds do work), to bring the pain to a manageable level.

      It always amazes me how many experts there are in how much pain people are in and how much they should be able to tolerate.

      You're wrong.

    15. Re:So lets do some Math. by spacepimp · · Score: 1

      Are you deliberately ignoring the overdose rate in West Virginia vs the rest of the country? These numbers indicate widespread abuse, not a small town where every single person in the town takes two pills daily and there is nothing to write about.

    16. Re:So lets do some Math. by plopez · · Score: 1

      I removed 50% of the population due to being children, pregnant, etc. I then divided that number by 3 as the national average for pain med Rx. I got about 8.

      But that did *not* factor in having 7 pharmaceis in town.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    17. Re:So lets do some Math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So lets do some Math.

      Screw the Math, I'm sure they can get us some Meth instead!

    18. Re:So lets do some Math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't be the only person that thinks 2 opiods per person (including babies!!!) per day is just as outrageous?

      "Drug Companies Shipped Equivalent of 10 Year Opiod Prescription for Every Man, Woman, and Child in WV Town"

      Seems just as exaggerated as the original. Probably because it actually is a fucking stupid amount of pills.

    19. Re:So lets do some Math. by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      And nobody is looking at OTHER nearby towns that may not have pharmacies, or being this is the only town with a Hospital in that county.

      I live in the county seat of a small county in Illinois, it has the only hospital in this county. The population of the county seat is a bit under 12000 and the county population of around 36000 .... and there are only 3 pharmacies.

      You are also ignoring WV's high opiate overdose rate.

    20. Re:So lets do some Math. by ortholattice · · Score: 1

      Another post says this town has the only hospital that serves a community of 26000+ people. So it is really like 0.24 med per person/day, or about 1 pill per day for every 4 people, assuming the town also has most of the pharmacies.

      Although it's been a while, I vaguely recall the dosage for oxycodone for severe pain as being 1 pill every 6 hours, or 4 per day. So that would be 4 pills per day for every 16 people, or about 6% of the population.

      While your "family" suffers from "constant pain", I haven't heard of people in severe pain needing only 1 pill per week. Maybe they really need more but tough it out until it's unbearable, because they can't find doctors willing to prescribe what they need? If so, that isn't a great quality of life.

      That isn't to say there isn't abuse, but the numbers don't exactly sound outrageous to me.

    21. Re:So lets do some Math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you! I'm blown away by the number of people who are dismissing this as just another click bait headline.

    22. Re:So lets do some Math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing accurate in your post is the math. Oxycodone & hydrocodone are taken once every 4-6 hours. Source: google "oxycodone dosage" & personal experience. Cancer pain doesn't go away. Lots of miners, smokers, obese peeps in WV. Not well known as a healthy place, though gorgeous.

      What this means is this town could be a weird outlier or it could be a major drug distribution point. There could also be other explanations. I know in Baltimore, many pharmacies simply don't carry opioids. If you call to ask if they carry them, they won't tell you. You have to go in.
        Perhaps this was an enterprising pharmacy in the region, who saw other pharmacies not serving a population. Yes, the town has 3000 people in it, but how many people are there within a 30 minute drive?

      Use your fucking heads people. This is an issue, but it's a Republican politician making a point in an election year where every Republican is in some electoral peril.

  15. Technically, is it that many? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody check my math, but it seems like it works out to less than 1 pill of each type per person per day for the 10 years. So, are we looking at drug abuse/distribution or some kind of chronic pain epidemic?

    Just asking...

    1. Re:Technically, is it that many? by volodymyrbiryuk · · Score: 0

      Calculation looks correct. I guess it's the pain that comes with living in a southern state.

      --
      sudo rm -r -f --no-preserve-root /
    2. Re:Technically, is it that many? by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Your math is correct but the article is wrong. The population of the town is 3,100+ as of 2010. Also, this town is the largest city in the county which has a total of 27,000 people, surely some of those used those pills too.

      My guess is the authors of the article where trying to make a point by skewing the population numbers lower. This is misleading to the max as for the county the pills/person works out to about 1/5th a pill per day per person.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    3. Re:Technically, is it that many? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But WV isn't a southern state. Even in the Civil War, they were Union.

    4. Re:Technically, is it that many? by nevermindme · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Looks like someone did not pay attention in history class or never has been to West Virginia to throw an unqualified southern state label around. Could WV be a sotherns state? YES....BUT. West Virginia was the part of Virginia that the secessionists either did not or cared not to control during the civil war. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... Most of the state's politics are focused today towards re-establishing a diverse manufacturing economy well situated to be part of the manufacturing process for the remarkable number of industries along the Ohio River.

    5. Re:Technically, is it that many? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Calculation looks correct. I guess it's the pain that comes with living in a southern state.

      Another fucking yankee that doesn't know his history....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    6. Re:Technically, is it that many? by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      My guess is the authors of the article where trying to make a point by skewing the population numbers lower.

      Thats not called a point. Its called a deception. A fucking lie.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    7. Re:Technically, is it that many? by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

      WV was created during the Civil War. The state split from VA and joined the North.

    8. Re:Technically, is it that many? by bobbied · · Score: 2

      I'm with you on this.. They will claim to not be technically lying because what they said is actually true, but they sure messed with the numbers to make a story out of something that wasn't a story..

      Figures never lie, but liars figure...

      AND

      There are lies, damnable lies and statistics..

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    9. Re:Technically, is it that many? by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

      Both.

    10. Re:Technically, is it that many? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Yes but Migration patterns AFTER the war have now "southernized" West Virginia (and Kentucky).

      Kentucky, a state that NEVER seceded and sent far more men to fight for the Union than the Confederacy has more Confederate monuments than Union. If you ask Kentuckians if they are Southerners, they now answer yes. But back during the war they would have said, No, having more in common with Indiana and Illnois. Now Kentucky is basically North Tennesse rather than "South Indiana"

      Hell now Indiana is basically North Kentucky because of migration patterns.

  16. Spread over 10 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Less than 2 pills per person per day in that big a time period. If the local industry is likely to produce long term injuries, this doesn't too unreasonable.

    1. Re: Spread over 10 years by NeoMorphy · · Score: 1

      1.96 is close enough to be counted as 2/day. If there are any children in that town, and assuming it's only the adults talking them, it's even more.

    2. Re: Spread over 10 years by plopez · · Score: 1

      My estimate was 8 after adjusting for national averages (I know, national), children, pregnant women etc.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    3. Re:Spread over 10 years by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

      The local industry (coal mining, nothing else) does produce a lot of long term injuries, but they don't employ a lot of people. This is very much a problem of the drug manufactures pumping pills into the state.

  17. Even crazier, all 2,900 people are a single family by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    Because it's all relative in West Virginia.

  18. Two pills a day, per person. by BenJeremy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If you break down the numbers, it's far less outrageous, but hey, why bother with the math? 20.8 million sounds like a crazy, impossible number, right? 20.8 million over 3650 days and 2900 people is less than 2 pills per person per day. Some people may be taking 4~6 pills a day on a regular basis (not saying that is good, but it is in line with a typical prescription), while others won't have any at all. It doesn't seem that unreasonable, given how opioids are prescribed these days.

    1. Re:Two pills a day, per person. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you break down the numbers, it's far less outrageous, but hey, why bother with the math? 20.8 million sounds like a crazy, impossible number, right? 20.8 million over 3650 days and 2900 people is less than 2 pills per person per day. Some people may be taking 4~6 pills a day on a regular basis (not saying that is good, but it is in line with a typical prescription), while others won't have any at all. It doesn't seem that unreasonable, given how opioids are prescribed these days.

      I was prescribed 8 per day when I was at my worst after a neck injury. And post-op I've been prescribed 12 per day for a period of a month.

    2. Re:Two pills a day, per person. by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      Yeah, hard math tends to hurt splashy headlines (as well as Congressional investigations looking for a silver bullet/whipping boy).

      On top of that, this part of WV is very sparsely populated and they don't have a pharmacy in every small town. Those pharmacies in Williamson are just about the only ones in that part of WV, so they're serving a much larger regional population than just those in the city limits. Total population in surrounding Mingo County in 2010 was nearly 27k. The numbers start getting really small really fast when you take into account how that part of the country actually operates.

    3. Re:Two pills a day, per person. by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      when you take into account how that part of the country actually operates.

      But why do that, when we elitists in big cities know how to run things better than stupid hicks in WV? That's just a fact!

      (Please note, sarcasm)

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    4. Re:Two pills a day, per person. by Carewolf · · Score: 0

      If you break down the numbers, it's far less outrageous, but hey, why bother with the math? 20.8 million sounds like a crazy, impossible number, right? 20.8 million over 3650 days and 2900 people is less than 2 pills per person per day. Some people may be taking 4~6 pills a day on a regular basis (not saying that is good, but it is in line with a typical prescription), while others won't have any at all. It doesn't seem that unreasonable, given how opioids are prescribed these days.

      That is still crazy high. Opiods should be giving in rare cases and only in short limited periods. Anyone taking more than a handful a year has problem.

      Hell if even this was normal weak painkillers 2 per person per day on average is a health-care emergency.

    5. Re:Two pills a day, per person. by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I tend to be adversarial and will try to break things. A supportive approach when problem-solving tends to just create more problems. Therefor, I would like to hear more about the dynamics of pharmaceutical services in this area of WV, and pursue the hypothesis that this investigation is founded on bullshit.

      Should that line of argument prove indefensible, then we are left with stronger evidence of drug supplier, pharmacist, and prescriber reckless neglect, if not collusion. I'm certain we can deliberately build a case for collusion if we simply ignore the facts and don't ask important questions about alternative theories; there are already enough people interested in that conclusion, so they should be able to provide an anchor against mishandling the opposing investigation.

    6. Re:Two pills a day, per person. by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

      I'm in a much smaller town than Williamson and I can think of 3 pharmacies within 5 miles of my current location. If I expand that to 15 miles I can think of 10 off the top of my head and I'm on the outskirts of pill territory.

    7. Re:Two pills a day, per person. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check google, there are at least 8 pharmacies in town.

    8. Re:Two pills a day, per person. by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      Look closer. Most of them are in South Williamson, across the border in Kentucky. Even if it's possible to fill controlled substance prescriptions across the state line, dollars to donuts most docs will write them and most people will fill them in their state.

    9. Re:Two pills a day, per person. by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      I'm in a much smaller town than Williamson and I can think of 3 pharmacies within 5 miles of my current location. If I expand that to 15 miles I can think of 10 off the top of my head and I'm on the outskirts of pill territory.

      Right, just like a bunch of small towns are within 10-20 miles of Williamson and its pharmacies, which is exactly my point. And it's not clear what your unverifiable anecdote has to do with the issue at hand. If you know of any pharmacies in Mingo County other than the three in Williamson, feel free to point them out.

    10. Re:Two pills a day, per person. by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Given your interpretation of those figures, between 1/3 and half of all people in that county, including the children, are on prescription painkillers.

      That is completely unreasonable, and the story is absolutely right to suggest it's newsworthy.

      Yes, opiods are over prescribed. But not to extent almost half the population is on them.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    11. Re:Two pills a day, per person. by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      So you are saying that you consider it normal that every
      single person in town takes opiates daily? Must be seriously painful living there. I mean, this is the kind of numbers pallative care facilities would have.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    12. Re:Two pills a day, per person. by plopez · · Score: 1

      WHen adjusted for pregnant women, children, etc. and using the national average of 1 in 3 Americans are on narcotics I worked it out to 8 per person per day.

      This did *not* include the fact there are 7 pharmacies in the town.

      That seems excessive to me.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    13. Re:Two pills a day, per person. by plopez · · Score: 1

      Most states allow Rx to cross borders. If someone comes in and says "I live just across the border and you are the closest and/or the only one my insurance will pay for" then not too many questions would be asked.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    14. Re:Two pills a day, per person. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tend to be adversarial and will try to break things. A supportive approach when problem-solving tends to just create more problems.

      Marx and Engels used the same methodology to come up with communism; look how well that turned out.

    15. Re:Two pills a day, per person. by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      Most states allow Rx to cross borders.

      Ok, and I said that even if that's permissible, I don't think it would move the needle too terribly much given the general tendency of smaller communities to keep dollars in their community whenever possible.

      If someone comes in and says "I live just across the border and you are the closest and/or the only one my insurance will pay for"

      Look at the map of Williamson. It's physically impossible to live in WV and be closer to a KY pharmacy than one on the WV side. And I'd be surprised if you saw much variation in network coverage. An awful lot of people abusing pills are going to be on SSI Disability/Medicaid anyway, and there's no rational way a pharmacy in that sort of community wouldn't accept that.

    16. Re:Two pills a day, per person. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations Mrs. Jones! You've given birth to a baby girl! Here's her first prescription for opiods and some samples to get her started!

      Every person in the county taking 2 pills per day is fucking ridiculous.

    17. Re:Two pills a day, per person. by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

      8 in Williamson. Trust me this is not about a sensational headline the pill problem was huge in southern WV, now its a heroin problem. Instead of trying to be an internet know it all why don't you listen to people who are intimately familiar with the situation and learn something. There is a reason people around here say the Mingo(insert your southern WV county of choice) mating call is the sound of someone shaking a pill bottle, its because people around here will do anything for dope.

    18. Re:Two pills a day, per person. by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

      What are you trying to prove with with your posts? Are you arguing that there is not a huge opiate problem in southern WV? If you are then you could not be any more wrong. It is obscene that 20M opiate pills were sold through 2 of the 8 pharmacies in a tiny town in Bumfuck middle of nowhere WV. Get your head out of your ass and stop arguing for the sake of arguing.

    19. Re:Two pills a day, per person. by jittles · · Score: 2

      Given your interpretation of those figures, between 1/3 and half of all people in that county, including the children, are on prescription painkillers.

      That is completely unreasonable, and the story is absolutely right to suggest it's newsworthy.

      Yes, opiods are over prescribed. But not to extent almost half the population is on them.

      There are over 26,000 people in that county, with only one hospital. That hospital is in the town in question.

    20. Re:Two pills a day, per person. by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 2

      Sure, but how many counties and people does the hospital serve? It doesn't matter how many people are in the county if it's the only hospital in 50 miles.

    21. Re:Two pills a day, per person. by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 1

      Get your head out of your ass and stop arguing for the sake of arguing.

      Says the person who continues to overstate numbers to try to make the problem sound more dramatic than it is, which is the issue I've quite openly expressed concern over from the beginning. There are not 8 pharmacies in the town of Williamson in the state of West Virginia. If you disagree, please post their names and addresses.

      And try to chill out a bit. I'm intimately acquainted with this general area of the country, and I understand well the challenges it has had for decades. But overwrought stories like this that play statistical tricks to try to make the numbers look as ridiculous as possible are simply going to look... well, ridiculous.

      At the end of the day, it doesn't matter where the pills are being dispensed, and likewise the fact that a lot of people in a geographical area all have to go to the same handful of places matters not a whit. The bottom line issue, as I know you understand, is the doctors that are overprescribing the pills, not the pharmacies that are simply carrying out the doctors' orders. And those doctors are, as they have for decades, trying to help their patients in their own twisted way. Just like they try to help by getting huge percentages of the population signed up for SSDI. If the pills dry up, the symptoms will shift to something else just like they shifted to the pills in the first place. To the extent you're trying to fight a war on drugs, you'll miserably fail just as all past efforts have. You have to address the underlying problem that's driving the behavior. And that's a lot harder than picking a meaningless scapegoat to publicly flog. Happy trails, friend.

    22. Re:Two pills a day, per person. by fafalone · · Score: 1

      It could absolutely move the needle. Finding a doctor that adequately treats pain isn't like finding some GP to look at your rash, nor is finding a pharmacy that keeps lots of pain meds in stock so you're not waiting days. Driving several hours to whole other states is very common. It's appalling how many people in this thread don't know the first thing about pain management yet comment like they're experts stating obvious facts. The media and politicians have done an excellent job whipping the population into a hysteria rivaling the crack panic of the 80s. Meanwhile dead silence about the mountains of dead bodies that lay right at the feet of those who didn't listen about what would happen when hundreds of thousands of people were kicked off quality controlled meds obtained from medical professionals; the OD epidemic surprised no one who had even the smallest inkling of knowledge about the drug war.

  19. Re: Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spotted the shareholder

  20. Re: Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha. A bottle of 20 pills lasts me 6 years. Well past the expiration date. When I had wisdom teeth pulled in US I had to dig out in my old med box for some OTC European pills that were 5 years past expiration so I can walk to work and actually work, instead of crouching down in pain on my couch after both hydro and oxy didn't exactly zip for more than a day. Nimesulide and the fore mentioned excedrin+codein pill had me on my feet in 20 minutes and no unmanageable pain for a day.

  21. Re: Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your doctor may have identified your drug-seeking behavior and intentionally given you non-narcotics, because nothing that you are claiming makes any sense

  22. 10 pills a minute. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Factoring an 8 hour work day and 313 work days a year that over 13 pills per minute. 830 pills per hour.

  23. Re: Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If your boss can't handle the idea that getting wisdom teeth pulled out of your face is justification for missing work, then your boss is a cunt

  24. Re:Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spoken like a true drug addict.

    Posting as AC for a reason here but... I hurt my neck years ago. I have actually participated in drug studies for these kinds of medications and there may be a genetic aspect to it that you're not recognizing. Or perhaps even a difference in gut bacteria. I was on transdermal pain medication for years. Super low dose, but it was highly effective. Low pain, no high feeling, felt normal. The problem was the medication was expensive so I went into a drug study to test an oral version of the exact same medication that was extended release. They had to triple my dosage to get the same level of pain relief orally as I received transdermally. Since then, they've found other ways to treat me without medication. I still have bad days every now and then and do sometimes take these sorts of medications orally. I went over 3 years without taking anything and, to this day, still have to do 2-3 times as much medication orally as I would through a patch. For some reason, my body does not properly metabolize these medications when taken orally.

  25. Re: Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But you can bring a crate full of grenades here to Sweden so who needs painkillers!

    Outside Sweden, you can buy lower strength codine over the counter and unrestricted in most of the EU. This lower strength product is normally paired with paracetamol and sold under the trade name co-codamol

  26. Where are they getting the money to buy it? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    This is not a hotbed of economic progress. How are they affording to pay for it?

    1. Re:Where are they getting the money to buy it? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      This is not a hotbed of economic progress. How are they affording to pay for it?

      They’re selling drugs on the streets.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Where are they getting the money to buy it? by AvitarX · · Score: 2

      Getting over perscriber and selling half is SOP in my city.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    3. Re:Where are they getting the money to buy it? by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

      Work, steal or suck. How do junkies anywhere else pay for drugs?

    4. Re:Where are they getting the money to buy it? by plopez · · Score: 1

      or sell

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  27. Re: Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is probably trolling but...

    I had hydrocodone after my wisdom teeth were removed. I was team au natural, "I don't need no stinking drugs" shortly off an IV anesthesia but my relative was (thankfully) smart enough to pickup my painkiller prescription regardless. Once the anesthesia started to lose effect, I shortly changes to team hydrocodone. If they didn't do anything that was an amazing placebo effect, especially considering that pain is one of the most difficult sensations to ignore.

  28. Online drug sales by aglider · · Score: 1

    Is it that difficult to guess?
    Try check with delivery and parcel services and you'll get the confirmation.

    --
    Sent as ripples into the electromagnetic field. No single photon has been harmed in the process.
  29. Back of the envelope calc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    20 Million sounds like a big number, especially for 2900 people. Let's do some math from elementary school.

    20 Million pills over 10 years means 5479 pills for every day.
    Now I don't take any opioids so I dunno how many pill an addict needs per day, but I'd say at least two,likely more, but at least two. So it's roughly 2800 people who are addicts.

    Supposedly there were 21.5 million US drug users 2014 using illegal drugs.

    1. Re:Back of the envelope calc by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

      "Now I don't take any opioids so I dunno how many pill an addict needs per day, but I'd say at least two,likely more, but at least two."

      The answer is how many do you have?

  30. Mingo County, WV went 83% for Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go figure.

    1. Re:Mingo County, WV went 83% for Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not surprising. You have to be on heavy opioids to make sense of what he's saying.

    2. Re:Mingo County, WV went 83% for Trump by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Makes sense that stupid liberals can't do math, or account for small towns in rural counties with only one hospital in that county, which happens to be in that town.

      Hillary's "Deplorables" comment helped her win the election!

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:Mingo County, WV went 83% for Trump by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      This "stupid liberal" lives in a small town in a rural county with only one hospital, in Illinois. The population of this town is a bit under 12000 and the county population of around 36000 .... and there are only 3 pharmacies.

      We also have strict rules on opiate prescriptions to prevent the kind of shit going down in WV. We are dealing with the problem with poor blue collar people and opiates...but addiction treatment is a covered service here. So it is nowhere near as bad as WV.

  31. Re: Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In fairness, that's likely.

    There are a lot of dumb cunts in the US who don't understand some people have wisdom teeth merely yanked out with next to no effort, while others have them shattered with little pieces picked out one at a time.

  32. Fake news! by OzPeter · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is all the work of criminal latino gangs. These gangs forced the poor people of the great state of West Virginia into the offices of innocent Doctors and coerced those brave and hardworking Doctors into writing prescriptions for the drugs.

    It is only by building a great and yuge wall (the best wall, the most beautiful wall) that we can stop the spread of drugs affecting the little babies all over the country. And today great American companies like Purdue Pharma (real heroes of the economy I tell you) have come out a stated that a wall is the best thing we can do for our country.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:Fake news! by gtall · · Score: 2

      Since many of the illicit drugs are shipped from China, we'll be needing a wall there as well. Oh look, they have a nice yuge wall already there across the north. All we need to do is get our lovely construction companies to repair it...we'll charge...err...Mexico for the repair....now where's that fellow Ping's phone number. President Kelly, could you ping Ping for me?

    2. Re:Fake news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, worse, it's Hillary and Obama.

      Obama gets his ISIS buddies in Afghanistan to grow the poppies and manufacture the drugs. Then, Hillary uses her vast deep-state network for distribution.

      Only The Donald can save us!

      #MakeAmericaStupidAgain

  33. Re: Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit. You can buy codine/codamol over the counter in ALMOST all European countries. Sweden & Germany might be an exception but in Denmark, UK, France, Spain, Italy, Belgium and Ireland you can buy many codine products over the counter. In most countries you can buy it in the pharmacy section of your local supermarket, you donâ(TM)t need an actual pharmacist

  34. Capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At its very finest. Why mess with the bottom line when your moving product and increasing profit!

  35. Re: Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you not try ibuprofen (or the prescription Motrin which is equivalent to 3 ibuprofen)? I had all four wisdom teeth taken out three years ago. Two were impacted. Doc said it was a very difficult job and Iâ(TM)d almost certainly need the painkiller and recommended I take it. Turned out three ibuprofen every few hours worked beautifully.

    And I know mine was a difficult job because my ex got hers taken out a year later and was able to stop taking ibuprofen (which is also all she took) after a few days, while I had to for at least 2 and a half weeks

  36. They call it.... by Jfetjunky · · Score: 2

    Hillbilly heroine (for a reason). My father has been addicted for a good portion of his later life.

    This is part of the reason I can't take people sheltered people seriously when they go off tangents about illicit drugs when people are likely addicted to synthetic opiates all around them. But that's totally fine because it came from a doctor. The older I've gotten, the more the line seems quite arbitrary, which makes it hard to believe in a system of enforcement of any kind.

    1. Re:They call it.... by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      It does make me wonder if legalizing weed (since it is cheap and you can grow it yourself) would alleviate the opiate crisis... people may still bomb themselves out of their minds but at least they won't be supporting whatever this prison pharma complex has become. Whether we pay to support these guys on welfare, or rehab, or prison it is on the public's dime right now any way you slice it.

    2. Re:They call it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does make me wonder if legalizing weed (since it is cheap and you can grow it yourself) would alleviate the opiate crisis... people may still bomb themselves out of their minds but at least they won't be supporting whatever this prison pharma complex has become. Whether we pay to support these guys on welfare, or rehab, or prison it is on the public's dime right now any way you slice it.

      But think of the poor shareholders!

    3. Re:They call it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need to wonder, the early figures for prescription drugs sales show a huge drop in state that has legalized. Painkillers lose out real bad.

    4. Re:They call it.... by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      It does make me wonder if legalizing weed

      Yeah, I've been wondering that too and have been edging more towards the legalize with controls mindset.

      People shouldn't smoke the stuff though, that's the WORST way to imbibe it. They ought to put THC into patches or gum or powder you can mix with stuff.

      As an aside they really ought to have a prescription Ensure supplement with a touch of THC for seniors/disabled folks with appetite/nutritional issues.

    5. Re:They call it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know a former law enforcement officer who used to brag about taking dangerous drugs off of the streets. She pops Xanax and Percocet like they're candy, leaves the bottles all over the house. Her son is constantly at his wit's end trying to deal with her as she slowly drifts further and further away from reality while her finances crumble beneath her. But it's all A-okay because a doctor told her to spend her every waking hour blissed out like a fucking glam rocker, and they'd better not legalize marijuana or this whole country will go straight to hell in a handbasket. The best part? She drives like that.

      I also know a factory worker who busts his ass to take good care of his wife, child and in-laws. He is denied the right to vote because one time the police found a quarter gram of cannabis in his car.

      Meanwhile, every other commercial on TV is for a pill that may or may not help your "Invisible Disease" at the cost of side effects that make cocaine look downright healthy.

  37. They'll get to to bottom of this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FO

  38. The population isn't 2,900! by bobbied · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The town's population is 3,100. This city is the largest city in the county which has a population of about 30,000.

    Surely these pills didn't get distributed only to those living in the city.... So Why do we discuss the size of the town only and not the county which the pharmacies obviously serve too? I'm pretty sure more than just city folks get their prescriptions filled in town.

    Somebody is being misleading here....Very misleading. I think on purpose.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    1. Re:The population isn't 2,900! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Oh thank god. For a moment I thought the entire population was popping 2 pills a day rather than the entire population popping a pill every 5 days. I'm glad you cleared that up.

    2. Re:The population isn't 2,900! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are 8 pharmacies in that town, WHY are all the prescriptions filed at two of them? Its because they do no double checking. A wink and a nod and here are your prescriptions.

    3. Re:The population isn't 2,900! by bobbied · · Score: 1

      ONE hydrocodone every 5 days is a serious problem?

      The typical prescription is 1 every 4 hours, sometimes 2 so you get 6-12 pills per day. When I've gotten these, I usually get 3 days worth which works out to 18-36 pills per RX..... That means they are passing out 1 RX for hydrocodone every 90 - 180 days per person (or about ~2 RX per year if my math is right).

      Getting two RX scripts for pain each year doesn't sound too bad for an average, especially if the demographics favor older people. I got three pain med scripts last year myself though I only filled one. My daughter got about 5 scripts, but she was in a car accident that broke her arm and had it re-set once before they gave up and did surgery so there's good reason for this.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    4. Re:The population isn't 2,900! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh thank god. For a moment I thought the entire population was popping 2 pills a day rather than the entire population popping a pill every 5 days. I'm glad you cleared that up.

      If a person drinks a single beer every 5 days, is that a big issue?

      Why then is it one to take a pill every 5 days? Especially when alcohol is both more dangerous, more intoxicating, and more addictive than opiates.

    5. Re:The population isn't 2,900! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      ONE hydrocodone every 5 days is a serious problem?/quote

      For one person no. For an entire population it shows a horrific substance dependency problem.

    6. Re:The population isn't 2,900! by bobbied · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure it does. 2 RX scripts per year per person doesn't seem crazy. We've averaged more than that as a family of 4 for a couple of years. But to really know, we need to look at average RX rates for similar social economic and age groups nation wide and compare it to the local RX rate. This discussion of how many pills are being shipped to a location is useless information without some serious context.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    7. Re:The population isn't 2,900! by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure it does. 2 RX scripts per year per person doesn't seem crazy. We've averaged more than that as a family of 4 for a couple of years.

      American right? I wasn't even given an opiates subscription last time I recovered from surgery abdominal surgery. Last time I took some basic 30mg codeine was 2 years ago after a tooth extraction (and that wasn't even the most recent one).

      A lot of the drugs Americans seem to depend heavily on are carefully controlled or outright not available in other countries, and I'm not talking about 3rd world we can't afford it you're gonna die unavailable, but rather the 1st world why the heck would you want that take a cup of cement a vitamin and harden up kind of way.

      An opiate every 5 days doesn't seem crazy? Wow. Just Wow.

    8. Re:The population isn't 2,900! by bobbied · · Score: 1

      No, I'm saying that a script or two per year/per person doesn't seem crazy for some populations depending on the age mix.

      I'm also saying that the authors of the article used inappropriate numbers and do so on purpose. I'm guessing they are trying to make a point, but when you make a point using misleading facts, I'm inclined not to trust your conclusions and question pretty much everything you say. They needed to do a bit of basic investigation here and actually establish how those pills where distributed. I have a feeling they all didn't end up in a town of 2,900 or even the county of 30,000.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    9. Re:The population isn't 2,900! by bobbied · · Score: 1

      https://slate.com/technology/2018/01/20-8-million-pain-pills-shipped-to-one-town-over-10-years-might-not-be-that-bad.html

      The above discusses the issues that I have with this story...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    10. Re:The population isn't 2,900! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMFG, are you serious? Please tell me you are just trolling.

      Two million pills were shipped to a town of just 3,000 every year for a decade, but that isn't suspicious to you? What is suspicious in your feeble minds is that the MSM is reporting such high numbers?

      Holy fucking shit, just how stupid are you Trumpster divers? Will you believe anything Fox & Friends tells you?

      Maybe you should stick to reading InfoWars, rather than Slashdot.

  39. KILL WHITEY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same as the CIA flooding the inner city with crack in the 80's-90's.
    Gotta kill off those useless eaters some way.

    1. Re:KILL WHITEY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if we're killing off useless people, why not start with the CxO's and investment bankers.

    2. Re:KILL WHITEY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, when I read Atlas Shrugged, it occurred to me that replacing these so-called leaders would be the EASIEST thing to do, and in fact should be our goal

  40. The real puzzle by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Even more outrageous is why the crooks were not smart enough to spread the contraband across cities so it doesn't stand out. They must have been users.

  41. Community size by Dan+East · · Score: 2, Interesting

    WV is a neighboring state, and I happen to know a good bit about its demographics. WV has extremely rural areas - one county has a few dozen zip codes and some only have a hundred people in them, and the entire county only has around 10k people (and it is not a huge county geographically). The fact that the exact town the pharmacy is in only has 2,900 people does not mean those are the only people served by that pharmacy. It may serve the entire county and portions of the adjoining counties as well. The number is very, very deceiving if intended to represent the total customer base of those pharmacies.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Community size by DavidHumus · · Score: 4, Informative
      Interesting how many of the comments here are fighting the numbers. It's not like West Virginia leads the nation in drug-related deaths - oh, wait, they do:

      In 2016, the five states with the highest rates of death due to drug overdose were West Virginia (52.0 per 100,000), Ohio (39.1 per 100,000), New Hampshire (39.0 per 100,000), Pennsylvania (37.9 per 100,000) and (Kentucky (33.5 per 100,000).

      [https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/data/statedeaths.html]

      But that's probably a big coincidence.

    2. Re:Community size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      proof that if you live in or near west virginia, drugs are needed to forget that sad fact.

      no explaination for new hampshire, though.. though it might have to do with part being in the fringes of boston, and the other part being home to dartmouth.

    3. Re:Community size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate the pharma vampires as much as the next Slashdotter, but the Drug Warriors aren't really any better. Don't give them a free pass on bullshit just because you agree with what they're doing today. As soon as they decide that the amount of opium being pumped into our communities for a profit is back to an "acceptable" level, they're going to go right back to raiding nursing homes and cancer patients with our tax dollars.

  42. Re: Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Different AC here but ibuprofen has zero pain relieving effect for me. On the other had it is a somewhat good fever reducer, but nowhere near as good as metamizole (which is unfortunately banned now, but as a kid growing up the universal pill was metamizole + quinine)

  43. If it is laxative... by grumpyman · · Score: 1

    It's only good for 20 years for all residents. Not enough.

  44. coal miners are in pain and work rules say no pot by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    coal miners are in pain and work rules say no to Medical Marijuana

  45. Re:They probably weren't all for just that one tow by Immerman · · Score: 2

    1.9 pills per day, per person. Better lay off the pills when you're doing math.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  46. More troubling: Wholesalers looking the other way by CheckeredFlag · · Score: 1

    It was two drug wholesalers that knowingly shipped all those pills and looked the other way. There is no way they would not have seen this as suspicious, but why question a huge revenue stream?

    Ohio-based Miami-Luken drug wholesaler reportedly sold 6.4 million hydrocodone and oxycodone pills to Tug Valley Pharmacy between 2008 and 2015, the company told the panel, according to the outlet. In 2008, the company’s shipments to the town tripled compared to the previous year.

    Some executive(s) needs to go to prison and become a warning to other wholesalers.

  47. Re: Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, yes. That boss didn't let me take absence even when I was suffering concussion from being rear ended. At that time being on H1B didn't give me many options to maneuver, but I left their sorry asses as soon as I got my green card.

  48. Has anyone done the math on this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    figuring in taking a pill 3 times a day, this means about 800 people in that town weren't taking pills. Our pharmacalogical overlords have failed us. On a serious note if every person in that town had ordered pills for 10 years, then yeah they were about 10 million pills short. So the number when taken in context is alarming. the way the headline is written is misleading.

    2900 population * 10 years *365 days a year * 3 times per day
    (= 31 million pills)
    vs

    2900 pop (* .7 to factor in adult vs youth) * 10 years (* .5 to factor people using the pills & not being addicts) * 365 days * 3 times per day.

    Yeah still scary as hell

  49. Hm.. Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MSMASH you Ignorant Slut.
    Why is this posted here? While it is a tragedy, and yes its horrible, and totally fucked up. But you stupid bitch, how does this related to Nerds? I or We get the impression that your loosing your train of thought while your Bangin BeauHD from Behind. Editordavid gets it..
    Someone a while ago posted a yourtube link with Dan Akaroid and Jane curtain.. Perhaps u should revisit it..

  50. this is how it happend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because the intelligence level is so low there, any they so much suck the tits of the govt so much. It's easy to see how this could happen..
    I think they all got to high to cover it up any more.
    I am sure msMash has a fuck ton of experience with this situation, right?
    I mean how can so much off topic garbage fall from your mouth like that, while your "PEGGING" BeauHd?
    Yeah, look it up, or perhaps you dont need to, as I suspect..
    feeling satisfied Beau???
    Gotta big satisfying face on???
    Did you wipe up the remainder from the corner of your lips?
    What color was the toilet paper when your both done?
    Was the bread soft?
    How many Batteries were harmed, killed, and or involved in this activity?
    Modd that up fuckers.. :)

  51. I did the math by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I did the math...that's 7,172 pain pills per person, if every single resident was gobbling them down at ~20 pills a day.

    But there's nothing to see here, no siree, just move along. And whatever you do, don't say anything bad about the Sackler family, who almost single-handedly created this problem by deceptively marketing these opioids as being safe and manageable.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    1. Re:I did the math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You lost a zero in your calculations. 2 not 20.

      20,800,000 pills / 2900 residents / 10/ years / 365 days in a year = 1.965 = 2 per resident per day

    2. Re:I did the math by plopez · · Score: 1

      Many people will probably not be perscribed (prenant women, children, anyone with a CDL etc.) the overall Rx rate being 1/3 and I worked it out to 8 per day. Now factor in I counted 7 pharmacies in the town.

      Not good.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  52. It's a symptom of the welfare state by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure they were almost all abused. However, it's a way to scam money in a society that FDR's New Deal deliberately destroyed, and that the Democrats have been exploiting for senate seats for almost a century. It took Hilary to demonstrate that the DNC has betrayed and used them, and will take at least another 2 generations to recover from the damage, if the Democrats don't regain power and double down.

    1. Re:It's a symptom of the welfare state by fredrated · · Score: 1

      As opposed to the Republican party showing a stick up everybody's ass.

  53. Re: Fake news by HiThere · · Score: 1

    I think it varies a lot between people. I don't get much benefit from it either, OTOH I get *NO* benefit from acetaminophen, and alway use either aspirin or ibuprofen instead. Or sometimes alcohol, even though it doesn't reduce inflammation.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  54. That's only 2 pills per person per day by phoenix_rizzen · · Score: 1

    What's the big deal? ;)

  55. Update, town has 7 pharmacies by plopez · · Score: 1

    Yep 7. No numbers on number of narcotics sent to the other 5.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  56. Re:They probably weren't all for just that one tow by plopez · · Score: 1

    factor in there are 7 pharmacies in the town. I estimated 8 pills per person per day when I factored in children, nursing moms etc. *without* adjusting for those 7 pharmacies.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  57. Re:Fake news by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

    so they can't have any opioid effects.

    Other than overdose and death.

    Do you understand that there is basically an 8 or 9 figure industry in the US based only around providing medication for opioid overdose? If the mass market opioid drugs are not to blame for this because they don't produce any opioid effects like you claim, then why does the anti-overdose industry exist?

    If you want a hint, look at the historical price of naloxone from its market debut in 1971 until today, and compare the price changes with sales of prescription opioids. Look at stats from the CDC like saying that in 2014 over 47,000 people died in the US from drug overdoses, a new high number, and 60% of those deaths were from opioids. If pills like this have no opioid effects, which by the way completely ignores the experiences of so many people who have abused them, then are you suggesting that all of these people are dying from injecting heroin? Why do you think people end up abusing oxy and hydrocodone? Do they just like the taste?

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  58. Re: Fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Denmark you can but "Kodimagnyl DAK" containing 500 mg asipirin and 9,6 mg codeinphosphathemihydrat per pill without prescription.

  59. Meanwhile in the rest of the world... by stooo · · Score: 1
    --
    aaaaaaa
  60. no irony in profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there is no guise, "profits over people" is their slogan

  61. The Case for Cannabis by Eldaar · · Score: 1

    It's really unfortunate that science and research into cannabis and hemp extracts has been hampered for so long, since the more we analyze these plants, the more we understand just how beneficial some of their cannabinoids are.

    I bring this up because an increasing number of patients and doctors are discovering the ability of CBD (cannabidiol, non-psychoactive) to relieve pain. Take the case of long-time professional baseball pitcher, David Wells: https://www.youtube.com/watch?.... There is plenty of additional evidence to the efficacy of CBD - just search online. But here's an additional example: https://www.forbes.com/sites/d...

    My hope is that more people will become aware that CBD can be a very effective alternative to opioids for pain relief, since CBD has very few negative side effects and is not habit-forming the way opioids are. And in fact, while CBD extracted from cannabis is only legal in some states, CBD extracted from hemp is legal in all 50 states. For those curious, the only real difference between marijuana and hemp is that the former has more than 0.3% THC content, whereas the latter has less than 0.3% THC content. THC is the psychoactive cannabinoid - the one that makes you feel high.

  62. Mingo and destiny? by istartedi · · Score: 1

    It seems like that place is destined to be at the epicenter of the USA's social issues. Unionization of coal mines there sparked a massive civil conflict back in the 1920s.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  63. Tug Valley? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously? you can't make this shit up

  64. 20E6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What gets me about cases like this is how LONG it took to find the pharmacy pushing out 20E6 pills or the individual doctor prescribing hundreds of thousands a year.

    More commonly referenced as 2E7. I mean, really, who uses scientific notation and goes to 10+?

    1. Re:20E6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keeping the E+ part to multiples of 3 makes it easier to say it in words. It's the difference between being able to say "20 million" and "2... err... wait... 20... umm... million". E+6 is millions. E+7 is tens of millions. Nobody says "two tens of millions" because it just sounds dumb.

  65. Re: Fake news by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

    Isn't acetaminophen an antipyretic (fever reducer) and aspirin and ibuprofen anti-inflammatories (NSAID's)? I wouldn't call any of them pain killers. In my experience even the hydrocodone and oxycodone formulations don't work that well to kill pain. I have to take at least 15mg to notice any relief and that might just be the opiate buzz.

    The best actual pain killer I've taken is Propoxyphene, but it was withdrawn from market due to causing electrical problems with the heart. I had a torn ligament and it worked great to take away the sharp pain while not affecting me mentally.

  66. I'm sure they'll get to the bottom of this... by qeveren · · Score: 1
    --
    Don't just stand there, get that other dog!
  67. Re:More troubling: Wholesalers looking the other w by qeveren · · Score: 1

    The DEA was investigating this whole mess, but then Congress mysteriously shut that down...go figure.

    --
    Don't just stand there, get that other dog!
  68. Other communities nearby by superdave80 · · Score: 1

    Williamson is by far the largest city in the county. In fact, looking at the wikipedia page, there are only four towns listed, plus about twenty or so unincorporated areas. The total county population is about 29,000 (10x Williamson), so it is entirely possible that a lot of these surrounding communities go to Williamson for their prescriptions since they are too small to each have their own pharmacy.

  69. Re:Fake news by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 1

    ^^^ check the username. I'm familiar with pharmacogenetics and biosythetic pathways. Occam's razor: Which is more likely? Pharmacogenetics or bog standard drug abuse? GGP's post certainly sounds more like drug tourism than genuine inability to get relief. Everybody on this damned planet thinks they are a special snowflake that deserves some special consideration, due to their circumstances... GGP isn't special, he/she just wants others to think they are.

    --
    Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
  70. Well all those working class supporters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump has put back down the mines instead of on welfare need something to kill the pain.

    They do a mans job Sir!

  71. blockchain to the rescue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    be sure to jump on the blockchain band wagon!

  72. Some history here.... by hamster_nz · · Score: 1

    Just had to see what this place looked like - "a pharmacy in an a shack" wouldn't be too far from the mark.

    Also saw this on the search query:

    n the recent case of Tug Valley Pharmacy et al v All Plaintiffs (2015 W.Va. LEXIS 673 [May 13, 2015]), the West Virginia Supreme Court weighed in on public policy concerning the diversion of controlled substances. The ruling allowed substance abusers to sue the prescribers and pharmacists who supplied the medications, even though the patients acknowledged engaging in an array of illegal activities including criminally acquiring narcotics by misleading physicians and pharmacists, doctor shopping, and ingesting the medications in amounts greater than prescribed.

    http://www.pharmacytimes.com/p...

  73. Opiates are the religion of the masses by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
  74. I had a cat scan it said I had 3 kidney stones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was given 18 pills I used about 5. Yes I took a lot of the pain.
    I need about 1800 pills, f those things hurt and as much as they hurt sciatica hurts 1000 times worse and you will get less meds.

  75. Re: Fake news by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    It does. I have DNA test results (Medimap...hopefully the price will come down, it was ~$600) showing which meds work best, and which don't, in a sort of stoplight chart, along with verbal descriptions. The results were enlightening, and explained why a couple meds weren't doing much for me.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise