7. Less^H^H^H^H More Secure
"Open source" means that anyone can get a copy of the source code. Developers can find and fix security weaknesses very easily with Linux. The same is not true with Microsoft Windows.
7. Less^H^H^H^H More Secure
"Open source" means that anyone can get a copy of the source code. Developers can find and fix security weaknesses very easily with Linux. The same is not true with Microsoft Windows.
on the web encoded with a simple algorithm (rot13?:) without any informations on how to read it in clear?
For many of us (if not all) it will be very easy to find the encoding scheme but legally the code is not public because of encoding, so nobody can sue us.
If some lawyer thinks there is some DeCSS code inside our pages... well, boys, we can sue him for unauthorized decoding of informations.
Slashdot Mirror
Be positive!
A slashdot editor that read TFA: priceless!
ha!
Are you one of those who think Slashdot's editors RTFA?
The Designed for Microsoft Windows sticker is attached on my toilet for years.
The linux kernel people are in a very big trouble: evidences of the theft are in many places:
.
: #define max(x,y) ({ \
.
e t.c:92:#define min(a,b) (((a)<(b))?(a):(b)): #define min(a,b) (((a)<(b))?(a):(b)): #define min(x,y) ({ \
$ grep -n '#define max(' -r
./drivers/net/pcmcia/wvlan_mdd.h:140:#define max(a,b) (((a) > (b)) ? (a) : (b))
./drivers/telephony/ixj.h:66:#define max(a,b) (((a)>(b))?(a):(b))
./include/linux/kernel.h:162
$ grep -n '#define min(' -r
./drivers/net/pcmcia/wvlan_mdd.h:143:#define min(a,b) (((a) < (b)) ? (a) : (b))
./drivers/scsi/isp/isp_linux.h:735:#define min(a,b) (((a)<(b))?(a):(b))
./drivers/scsi/isp/scsi_targ
./drivers/telephony/ixj.h:63
./include/linux/kernel.h:156
since the worm doesn't try the most common password: ******
GNU forces you to make any modifications public.
Sorry, this is simply wrong!
As long you don't distibute your derived work you are not forced to release the modifications!
..."top security manager" doesn't really mean "top security manager", or something.
This is my proposal: BrickOS
No problem, I've got the Word document source, so I've made a quick fix...
On page 3 of the Linux report:
7. Less^H^H^H^H More Secure
"Open source" means that anyone can get a copy of the source code. Developers can find and fix security weaknesses very easily with Linux. The same is not true with Microsoft Windows.
I've got the Word document source, so I've made a quick fix...
On page 3 of the Linux report:
7. Less^H^H^H^H More Secure
"Open source" means that anyone can get a copy of the source code. Developers can find and fix security weaknesses very easily with Linux. The same is not true with Microsoft Windows.
Netscape 2000.1, netscape 2000.2 etc...
well, you can have it NOW
I do not understand why people are looking for projects that tweak the OS itself, or add to it
To find a job at Microsoft perhaps?
on the web encoded with a simple algorithm (rot13? :) without any informations on how to read it in clear?
... well, boys, we can sue him for unauthorized decoding of informations.
For many of us (if not all) it will be very easy to find the encoding scheme but legally the code is not public because of encoding, so nobody can sue us.
If some lawyer thinks there is some DeCSS code inside our pages