It's not like every criminal in movies demands their cash transactions in twenties because they don't raise any flags, like bigger bills would.
Maybe in Finland it's perfectly normal to have a bunch of big bills in daily use.
Look at how the Netherlands organized it, we have the best internet in the world:)
Everyone in the US knows this, but the political system is broken and unable to do anything other than obey the powerfull cable companies.
Some people just like to see others suffer.
It's a shame that his punishment was overturned.
Freedom is not infinite, in the real world we don't have the freedom to cut each other with knives, why would we need that freedom on the internet?
They are doing more about it because of the scale of the current problem.
That scale is also the reason a person in the US got infected.
The scale is likely the result of a mutation in the virus, there's a much longer incubation time now.
Much of the debate was about privacy, atleast now it's clear that it leads to loss of freedom.
As for safety, yes giving up freedoms will lead to more protection against crime.
But every time the government does a bad job we will suffer less safety, are we that trusting of government?
Slashdot Mirror
Now everyone can generate hazardous nuclear waste that must be stored expensively for the coming hundred thousand years.
"pay as you use scalable computing and free programs ran on internet instead of your cpu" Is that not enough?
Yes it's possible, many countries have already gotten rid of the 1 and 2 eurocent coins.
It's not like every criminal in movies demands their cash transactions in twenties because they don't raise any flags, like bigger bills would. Maybe in Finland it's perfectly normal to have a bunch of big bills in daily use.
http://www.newyorker.com/news/...
:)
http://www.digitopoly.org/2014...
Look at how the Netherlands organized it, we have the best internet in the world
Everyone in the US knows this, but the political system is broken and unable to do anything other than obey the powerfull cable companies.
It won't. But people with big and expensive weddings often have more freedom to find another relationship, they don't need to stay together so much.
Some people just like to see others suffer. It's a shame that his punishment was overturned. Freedom is not infinite, in the real world we don't have the freedom to cut each other with knives, why would we need that freedom on the internet?
Seems like there are few seats, but I guess most people will stand.
Are you saying that 14.75 is more than 29000?
They are doing more about it because of the scale of the current problem.
That scale is also the reason a person in the US got infected.
The scale is likely the result of a mutation in the virus, there's a much longer incubation time now.
Much of the debate was about privacy, atleast now it's clear that it leads to loss of freedom. As for safety, yes giving up freedoms will lead to more protection against crime. But every time the government does a bad job we will suffer less safety, are we that trusting of government?