I believe the OP is asking, since the deterctor only returns one bit of information, how do we know that it is a gravitational wave and not an Aras freighter passing by the solar system.
Overpopulation is self-adjusting. It's not pretty, famine, war and diseases comes in to play, but it is still self-adjusting. We are not going to see the end of the world because of it.
As the technological level of a civilisation increases, the birth rate decreases. So population does tend to be seld adjusting.
Here is what I think will happen:
At some point Poettering will piss off Linux enough to get him banned from submitting to the mainstream kernel.
To deal with the problems of no active maintainer of systemd contributing to the kernel, Linus will write his own boot system.
This system will work better then the sysinit system, but not be anywhere near as onerous as systemd.
Peace will return to the linux landscape.
Sometimes to access a site, you need to connect to a proxy. Every piece of software that connects to the next has to assume it needs to be routed through a proxy. The reverse engineers can write a small proxy which reroutes those particular addresses to something else.
Still I find it hard to believe that IP's hard code IPs. They are prone to change.
You either don't know LLVM or you don't know Android.
Well obviously you either don't know these projects as well as you do or you are willing to lie about them.
They are not the same.
Obviously they are not Android is an Operating system and LLVM is a set of compiler tools. The point of analogies is to compare similar things that are different. Analogies comparing the same thing really don't work. For example, if doesn't make sense to draw an analogy between the digestive system of a Guernsey cow and the digestive system of a Guernsey cow does it?
LLVM was a postgrad student project,
A student whose name is Chris Lattner. Who has been the project maintainer his whole life. Who went to work for Apple to bring the code up to snuff and created a team there to maintain it.
and remains an open project, that anyone can contribute to http://llvm.org./
Android was a commercial product bought by Google
and whose core was open sourced. It's called AOSP. and like LLVM anyone can contribute to it.
If LLVM were a Microsoft product instead of an Apple product
LLVM is not an Apple product. It's an open source project which Apple, amongst others, incorporate into their products, and to which they contribute source improvements.
Right and Android LLVM is not an Google product. It's an open source project which Google, amongst others, incorporate into their products, and to which they contribute source improvements.
If LLVM were a Microsoft product instead of an Apple product, we would all agree he had reason to be wary. Frankly the way Apple has acted since Jobs came back, there would still be enough justification to be wary of them as Microsoft.
95% of 250 coders. That means that out of a million programmers they will misidentify 200000.
I suspect that there are few enough variances in style to make any coders style unique. For example whether to uses braces on a one line statement after an in if in C.
With a few programmers it's likely to work, but when the possible source of programmers is the world...
Not to mention emacs, Visual Studio and such enforcing some indentation standards and programming languages enforcing others.
Slashdot Mirror
I believe the OP is asking, since the deterctor only returns one bit of information, how do we know that it is a gravitational wave and not an Aras freighter passing by the solar system.
.._. .._ _._. _._ _.__ ___ .._
Have to put in something.
Hey slashdot learn the difference between Morse and ascii art!
It used to be.
Not that it was right.
Also now cell phone usage is metered.
I like the idea of fellatio, especially when delvered by Kate Upton.
The dial-up that I used did not have limits.
Overpopulation is self-adjusting. It's not pretty, famine, war and diseases comes in to play, but it is still self-adjusting.
We are not going to see the end of the world because of it.
As the technological level of a civilisation increases, the birth rate decreases. So population does tend to be seld adjusting.
You mean a skeptic like Freeman Dyson? I don't think he's a developer though he is a premier physicist.
Says the guy who doesn't even have a science degree. Just a masters in Engineering.
Hey "SCience GUy" I'll see your crappy Masters in Engineer and raise you a PhD in Mathematical Physics.
I remember in 1998 hearing the experts all say "This time it's different we won't crash."
To get torrenters to oppose Net Neutrality and Title II legislation.
Clarification: Name a few apps that you cannot find in "lesser" apps stores.
Sure, you can go with a lesser known app store, but you lose a good chunk of apps in the process.
Name a few?
Sounds to me like he is for it when he's not against it.
If the sperm is destroyed, is there anything left that contains DNA in the semen?
If not that this could be a big boon to rapists who no longer have to worry about leaving their DNA behind.
Here is what I think will happen:
At some point Poettering will piss off Linux enough to get him banned from submitting to the mainstream kernel.
To deal with the problems of no active maintainer of systemd contributing to the kernel, Linus will write his own boot system.
This system will work better then the sysinit system, but not be anywhere near as onerous as systemd.
Peace will return to the linux landscape.
We keep all the information about the Khardasians around?
I thought reverse engineering the server protocol was perfectly legal. Samba/CIFS and Bitkeeper are two protocols for which this was an example.
Sometimes to access a site, you need to connect to a proxy. Every piece of software that connects to the next has to assume it needs to be routed through a proxy. The reverse engineers can write a small proxy which reroutes those particular addresses to something else.
Still I find it hard to believe that IP's hard code IPs. They are prone to change.
You either don't know LLVM or you don't know Android.
Well obviously you either don't know these projects as well as you do or you are willing to lie about them.
They are not the same.
Obviously they are not Android is an Operating system and LLVM is a set of compiler tools. The point of analogies is to compare similar things that are different. Analogies comparing the same thing really don't work. For example, if doesn't make sense to draw an analogy between the digestive system of a Guernsey cow and the digestive system of a Guernsey cow does it?
LLVM was a postgrad student project,
A student whose name is Chris Lattner. Who has been the project maintainer his whole life. Who went to work for Apple to bring the code up to snuff and created a team there to maintain it.
and remains an open project, that anyone can contribute to http://llvm.org./
Android was a commercial product bought by Google
and whose core was open sourced. It's called AOSP. and like LLVM anyone can contribute to it.
s/Android LLVM/Android/
If LLVM were a Microsoft product instead of an Apple product
LLVM is not an Apple product. It's an open source project which Apple, amongst others, incorporate into their products, and to which they contribute source improvements.
Right and Android LLVM is not an Google product. It's an open source project which Google, amongst others, incorporate into their products, and to which they contribute source improvements.
If LLVM were a Microsoft product instead of an Apple product, we would all agree he had reason to be wary. Frankly the way Apple has acted since Jobs came back, there would still be enough justification to be wary of them as Microsoft.
Still I don't see much harm in it.
If ever there was a case that cried out for JURY NULLIFICATION this is it.
Too bad the jury did not agree with you.
95% of 250 coders. That means that out of a million programmers they will misidentify 200000.
I suspect that there are few enough variances in style to make any coders style unique. For example whether to uses braces on a one line statement after an in if in C.
With a few programmers it's likely to work, but when the possible source of programmers is the world...
Not to mention emacs, Visual Studio and such enforcing some indentation standards and programming languages enforcing others.
They are talking about the corporate code as a baseline to compare to the anonymous code.