Just because Apple has implemented restrictions in its OS, doesn't mean the iPad and iPad Mini aren't Turing Complete.
That said, I don't see how any research company that wants to maintain its credibility could make the claim that Apple is the leading PC seller. If they want to include tablets, you can't exclude smart phones from the list they run the same software. One just type just has a bigger screen. And with that taken into account, Samsung vastly outsells Apple.
But the GP was claiming that the usage of Grammar Nazi's in the OP was a possessive. You've told drinkypoo their wrong... and then proceeded to agree with him.
drinkypoo may have been wrong about the usage of apostrophe's in acronym's, its only really allowed when acronym's still contain the periods between each letter. eg multiple F.B.I's.
drinkypoo is also incorrect about claiming that Nazi is a backronym.
Apple was ordered to correct the damage they had done to Samsung's reputation through their false accusations that Samsung had copied them. Its a much more appropriate punishment to Apple for their continually incorrect statements about their competitor, rather than ordering them to pay an inconsequential amount of money. They've simply been ordered to right a wrong they committed, and to have that correction be given the same amount of press, as their initial false accusation.
The fact that you think this was an unfair ruling against Apple, clearly shows what side of the fanboi river you sit on.
I hope the judge throws a book at Apple for the amount of contempt they've shown the ruling.
Slashdot Mirror
As has also been mentioned multiple times, Motorola also came with 5.5B in cash and tax incentives. So we're now down to 1.5B for the patents.
Sounds exactly like the first episode of My Cat from Hell.
Yes but why would anyone ever want to use something that come out of Crtl-Alt-Del?
Or Australia goes on a drinking binge again...
The Lightning II is vaporware. Lockheed Martin are never going to finish it.
That said, I don't see how any research company that wants to maintain its credibility could make the claim that Apple is the leading PC seller. If they want to include tablets, you can't exclude smart phones from the list they run the same software. One just type just has a bigger screen. And with that taken into account, Samsung vastly outsells Apple.
Is Canalys a side project of Apple?
But the GP was claiming that the usage of Grammar Nazi's in the OP was a possessive. You've told drinkypoo their wrong... and then proceeded to agree with him.
drinkypoo may have been wrong about the usage of apostrophe's in acronym's, its only really allowed when acronym's still contain the periods between each letter. eg multiple F.B.I's.
drinkypoo is also incorrect about claiming that Nazi is a backronym.
So "in English" is the new "on a computer/mobile device"?
Yeah its not like Steve Jobs' company would ever go and get involved with the music industry right?
Apple was ordered to correct the damage they had done to Samsung's reputation through their false accusations that Samsung had copied them. Its a much more appropriate punishment to Apple for their continually incorrect statements about their competitor, rather than ordering them to pay an inconsequential amount of money. They've simply been ordered to right a wrong they committed, and to have that correction be given the same amount of press, as their initial false accusation. The fact that you think this was an unfair ruling against Apple, clearly shows what side of the fanboi river you sit on. I hope the judge throws a book at Apple for the amount of contempt they've shown the ruling.