"Criminalizing booze and drugs never slowed down usage"
wrong. Booze consumption drop to very lo rates, A
Actually you are wrong. It looks like consumption was roughly 60 to 70% of what it was before and after prohibition. That is not a "very low rate".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A...
After the prohibition was implemented alcohol continued to be consumed. However, how much compared to pre-Prohibition levels remains unclear. Studies examining the rates of cirrhosis deaths as a proxy for alcohol consumption estimated a decrease in consumption of 10–20%.[4][5][6] One study reviewing city-level drunkenness arrests came to a similar result.[7] And, yet another study examining "mortality, mental health and crime statistics" found that alcohol consumption fell, at first, to approximately 30 percent of its pre-Prohibition level; but, over the next several years, increased to about 60–70 percent of its pre-prohibition level.[8]
Amount of flouride in drinking water? 0.7 to 1.2 ppm
Amount of fluoride in mouthwash? 225 ppm
So drinking an ounce of mouthwash is equivalent to drinking between 188 and 321 ounces of water. In standard 8 ounce glasses of water that would be between 23.5 and 40 glasses of water.
So you may have a point if you drink a couple of gallons of tap water a day. I am going to guess that you don't though, so I would recommend that you drink your 8 glasses of water a day and don't drink your mouthwash.
While it is certainly possible you got a bad one, the only time I have ever seen a charging port messed up like you describe was when the device had not been taken care of properly.
Maybe you can find a S3 with a broken screen on Ebay and use the parts from it. I am unfamiliar with the guts of a S3 but I was able to replace the USB port on a Nexus 7 (1st gen) in about 10 minutes. You might also try to use a dock, it helps prevent damage cause it holds the phone in the correct position. The iffy port on the Nexus 7 would charge while on a dock but not on a cable alone.
For a number or reasons.
A) No vaccine is 100% effective.
B) Some children/people CANNOT get the vaccine because they are immuno compromised. Like that are in the middle of chemo.
The reason we do not commonly see the disease anymore is because there are enough immunized people that the disease has a hard time spreading. If you increase the number of people that are not immunized it is easier for the disease to spread. This would normally be fine with me. You want to watch your kids suffer for your stupidity, then by all means have at it. The issue here though is you make it easier to spread to those who got the vaccine and it didn't take and you make it easier to spread it to the kids with cancer or are otherwise immuno-surpressed.
That is the real issue. You not getting your germ magnets immunized can lead to someone else loosing their kid. Frankly in that situation if you or your kids have genetically the same virus then I think you should be liable in civil proceedings for their death or disfigurement.
At that point Darwin takes over and thins the herd.
After they see all of their children dying from easily prevented diseases they may start to reconsider their ill founded beliefs.
Quality. They come to go to places like the Mayo Clinic. The health care problem in the US is not the quality of the health care, its the quantity of health care. Sure maybe you can make a case that adding more health care might lower the average quality, but I highly doubt that places like Mayo are really going to be affected that much.
No, but I am sure they know the air units. Also many NG and AR units have large trucks, and lots of low ranking labor to help with the "grunt" work. Maybe they could help with the dismantling/transportation.
While I agree that religious gullibility is a problem, there is no reason to be an ahole. We all knew what the submitter meant. You just wanted to cause a flamewar.
XP mode is not compatibility mode. Completely different animals. Yes, if it runs on XP it should run in XP mode. There is your statement. It is not a legal statement, and I will not guarantee that it will run. I have yet to run across a piece of XP software that wouldn't run in XP mode though.
Just google XP mode. it is a feature of Win 7 pro, but you can get it to run on 7 home. Again google is your friend.
Seriously, just go google it, and stop asking silly questions like can I get a legal guarantee.
Even if your statement were true, it does not change the fact that the people who go to whole foods do not try to get the law changed forcing everyone to shop there.
Where as religious fundamentalists. do try to change laws forcing people to abide by their morals.
In the military I was always taught it was not only my right but my duty to disobey unlawful orders. Is this subject ever broached in training with the TSA?
t's a good idea to not just kill them indiscriminately
Did not lead me to believe you understood entirely. So yes I did type that part in caps to emphasize that fact. I will keep it in mind to use the bold tags in the future.
I do not condone just killing animals for no reason, but killing 3% of the horeshoe crabs (for a good reason) does not even show up on my radar. My main point with the one liner is that they are not nearly as endangered/threatened as the person I was replying to had implied.
If the animals were actually endangered I would not be in favor of catching wild ones, but I would probably be in favor of trying to breed them in some sort of horeshoe crab farm if that was possible. Shoot maybe they even taste good.
Slashdot Mirror
"Criminalizing booze and drugs never slowed down usage" wrong. Booze consumption drop to very lo rates, A
Actually you are wrong. It looks like consumption was roughly 60 to 70% of what it was before and after prohibition. That is not a "very low rate". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A...
After the prohibition was implemented alcohol continued to be consumed. However, how much compared to pre-Prohibition levels remains unclear. Studies examining the rates of cirrhosis deaths as a proxy for alcohol consumption estimated a decrease in consumption of 10–20%.[4][5][6] One study reviewing city-level drunkenness arrests came to a similar result.[7] And, yet another study examining "mortality, mental health and crime statistics" found that alcohol consumption fell, at first, to approximately 30 percent of its pre-Prohibition level; but, over the next several years, increased to about 60–70 percent of its pre-prohibition level.[8]
I am surprised it took this long for the lawyers to get geared up
Hmm In my experience the teller fills out the slip for me, I review and sign it. YMMV though.
The good news is that laws can be changed.
The bad news is when they do change they are more often then not becoming more draconian.
Amount of flouride in drinking water? 0.7 to 1.2 ppm
Amount of fluoride in mouthwash? 225 ppm
So drinking an ounce of mouthwash is equivalent to drinking between 188 and 321 ounces of water. In standard 8 ounce glasses of water that would be between 23.5 and 40 glasses of water.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F...
http://thyroid.about.com/libra...
So you may have a point if you drink a couple of gallons of tap water a day. I am going to guess that you don't though, so I would recommend that you drink your 8 glasses of water a day and don't drink your mouthwash.
Because the amount in their products is many times the amount in your water?
While it is certainly possible you got a bad one, the only time I have ever seen a charging port messed up like you describe was when the device had not been taken care of properly. Maybe you can find a S3 with a broken screen on Ebay and use the parts from it. I am unfamiliar with the guts of a S3 but I was able to replace the USB port on a Nexus 7 (1st gen) in about 10 minutes. You might also try to use a dock, it helps prevent damage cause it holds the phone in the correct position. The iffy port on the Nexus 7 would charge while on a dock but not on a cable alone.
Well it was a real knee slapper. /sarc
How do you undo moderation when you are the first post? Who exactly were you moderating?
The micro use on my phone has been used well more then hundreds of times, and shows no signs of failing.
For a number or reasons.
A) No vaccine is 100% effective.
B) Some children/people CANNOT get the vaccine because they are immuno compromised. Like that are in the middle of chemo.
The reason we do not commonly see the disease anymore is because there are enough immunized people that the disease has a hard time spreading. If you increase the number of people that are not immunized it is easier for the disease to spread. This would normally be fine with me. You want to watch your kids suffer for your stupidity, then by all means have at it. The issue here though is you make it easier to spread to those who got the vaccine and it didn't take and you make it easier to spread it to the kids with cancer or are otherwise immuno-surpressed.
That is the real issue. You not getting your germ magnets immunized can lead to someone else loosing their kid. Frankly in that situation if you or your kids have genetically the same virus then I think you should be liable in civil proceedings for their death or disfigurement.
At that point Darwin takes over and thins the herd. After they see all of their children dying from easily prevented diseases they may start to reconsider their ill founded beliefs.
Perhaps the scientists are just incompetent to interpret their data.
Yes and I am sure that you are competent enough to disprove them, amiright?
You sound like the guy.. "I've been smoking for 60 years and it never caused me any problems"
Quality. They come to go to places like the Mayo Clinic. The health care problem in the US is not the quality of the health care, its the quantity of health care. Sure maybe you can make a case that adding more health care might lower the average quality, but I highly doubt that places like Mayo are really going to be affected that much.
No, but I am sure they know the air units. Also many NG and AR units have large trucks, and lots of low ranking labor to help with the "grunt" work. Maybe they could help with the dismantling/transportation.
While I agree that religious gullibility is a problem, there is no reason to be an ahole. We all knew what the submitter meant. You just wanted to cause a flamewar.
Sounds like your view of the facts are based upon nothing but what Rush told you. But please do go ahead, you are humerous in your infantile fury.
So how much does it cost to publish your own book nowadays.
Well, do tell what is the name of your book. I would like to order it.
XP mode is not compatibility mode. Completely different animals. Yes, if it runs on XP it should run in XP mode. There is your statement. It is not a legal statement, and I will not guarantee that it will run. I have yet to run across a piece of XP software that wouldn't run in XP mode though.
Just google XP mode. it is a feature of Win 7 pro, but you can get it to run on 7 home. Again google is your friend.
Seriously, just go google it, and stop asking silly questions like can I get a legal guarantee.
Even if your statement were true, it does not change the fact that the people who go to whole foods do not try to get the law changed forcing everyone to shop there. Where as religious fundamentalists. do try to change laws forcing people to abide by their morals.
The Constitution is never wrong, the law is wrong. The issue is no one has successfully challenged the law.
But don't you dare ever forget the Constitution cannot be overrode by a law.
Either way I am disappointed my question did not get an answer.
Exactly this. The people who love whole foods do not try to get laws passed making everyone shop there.
In the military I was always taught it was not only my right but my duty to disobey unlawful orders. Is this subject ever broached in training with the TSA?
t's a good idea to not just kill them indiscriminately
Did not lead me to believe you understood entirely. So yes I did type that part in caps to emphasize that fact. I will keep it in mind to use the bold tags in the future.
I do not condone just killing animals for no reason, but killing 3% of the horeshoe crabs (for a good reason) does not even show up on my radar. My main point with the one liner is that they are not nearly as endangered/threatened as the person I was replying to had implied.
If the animals were actually endangered I would not be in favor of catching wild ones, but I would probably be in favor of trying to breed them in some sort of horeshoe crab farm if that was possible. Shoot maybe they even taste good.