Slashdot Mirror


Horseshoe Crabs Are Bled Alive To Create an Unparalleled Biomedical Technology

Lasrick writes "Alexis Madrigal at the Atlantic: 'The marvelous thing about horseshoe crab blood, though, isn't the color. It's a chemical found only in the amoebocytes of its blood cells that can detect mere traces of bacterial presence and trap them in inescapable clots.' Madrigal continues, 'To take advantage of this biological idiosyncrasy, pharmaceutical companies burst the cells that contain the chemical, called coagulogen. Then, they can use the coagulogen to detect contamination in any solution that might come into contact with blood. If there are dangerous bacterial endotoxins in the liquid—even at a concentration of one part per trillion—the horseshoe crab blood extract will go to work, turning the solution into what scientist Fred Bang, who co-discovered the substance, called a "gel." ... I don't know about you, but the idea that every single person in America who has ever had an injection has been protected because we harvest the blood of a forgettable sea creature with a hidden chemical superpower makes me feel a little bit crazy. This scenario is not even sci-fi, it's postmodern technology.'"

159 comments

  1. Bled Alive? by just_another_sean · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does PITA know about this? /ducks and covers

    --
    Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    1. Re:Bled Alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd sure hope so, I hunger for their meaty replies.

    2. Re:Bled Alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Does PITA know about this? /ducks and covers

      No but HUMMUS Does

    3. Re:Bled Alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Been going on for decades. Nothing new here. If PE^HITA disagrees, perhaps they should explain why the crabs, which are really more like spiders, are more important than all the people whose lives have been saved by this practice.

    4. Re:Bled Alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That was my first thought actually. Are they kept alive and 'donate' a little at a time, or are they bled dry and then just tossed on the barbie? The latter seems a bit erm, wasteful and shortsighted to say the least.

      Also, as any biologist (or intelligent human) is aware, there is NO SUCH THING as a 'forgettable' creature. While the concept is interesting (if a bit discomforting), the summary reads like the ravings of sociopath.

    5. Re:Bled Alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pita are bread you insensitive clod!

    6. Re:Bled Alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, they take 30% of the crab's blood and do a distant release to avoid recapture. Research went into checking if the bleeders have reduced respawning. There's also research into a synthesizing the bacteria flagger.

      It sounds savage and I'm not suggesting they're kind to the crabs, but it sounds like they're not being totally irresponsible and causing another dodo.

    7. Re:Bled Alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People for the Inhumane Treatment of Animals?
      I'm pretty sure they started it... not for medical reasons, just for kicks; the medical benefits were a bonus though.

    8. Re:Bled Alive? by leonardluen · · Score: 1

      but i like eating tasty animals in pita's you insensitive clod!

    9. Re:Bled Alive? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      ...and THAT's just how they roll.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    10. Re:Bled Alive? by rthille · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised they don't just mark them with the date of last bleeding and release them where they caught them.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    11. Re:Bled Alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's precisely because it's a "forgettable" creature that is such a potent argument for maintaining the bio-diversity of our world.

      Imagine that one day there's a mollusk or a frog or species or anemone that holds a treatment or cure for some new bug or disease.

    12. Re:Bled Alive? by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Does PITA know about this? /ducks and covers

      I remember seeing an environmental lobbying video 20 years ago that featured the LAL assay (the assay in TFA). Horseshoe crabs do not need to be killed to harvest their blood, and at least at that time they were a threatened species.

      I have no idea where PITA falls into this, but environmentalists in general should be all for properly managing and caring for this renewable resource.

    13. Re:Bled Alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Responsible varpires they are. They need to research magnetic field, or electric shock crab forgetfulness technology next to complete the picture.

    14. Re:Bled Alive? by srmalloy · · Score: 2

      Marking their shell with the date of their harvest doesn't do you any good if you don't know how long it will be until the next time they moult; anything marking or attached to their shell will stay with the shell at moult, so if you harvest a crab, bleed it, mark the shell, and it moults a month later, you might pick up the same crab before it has a chance to recover.

    15. Re:Bled Alive? by hey! · · Score: 3, Funny

      That makes me felafel.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    16. Re:Bled Alive? by gnick · · Score: 2

      People for the Inhumane Treatment of Animals?

      That sounds like a great idea! Try to adopt out cute fuzzy puppies who are well-fed and well-cared for, maybe and maybe not. But if you start juggling the little buggers - Just watch how fast people run up to snatch them out of your hands!

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    17. Re:Bled Alive? by maharvey · · Score: 1

      Does PITA know about this? /ducks and covers

      Pain In The Ass?

    18. Re:Bled Alive? by doggo · · Score: 1

      Do they... at least give 'em a cup of juice after? And a cookie?

    19. Re:Bled Alive? by gnick · · Score: 1

      Dag-nabbit. PITA is either Pain In The Ass or a type of bread. The "animals are people too" group (as opposed to the more rational, "people are animals too" group IMO) are PETA - People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    20. Re:Bled Alive? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      Yeah, saying they're "bled alive" is a lot like saying you are "bled alive" every time you donate blood. A bit misleading.

    21. Re:Bled Alive? by phaedrus5001 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I actually work for a company that does this. The crab will only bleed a certain amount of blood (usually ~30%), then stop. We also don't bleed them if they're wounded or lethargic. I will agree, though, that I find the claim of a 'forgettable' creature dubious. Of course, this practice is the alternative of using rabbits to to check for bacterial endotoxins, so take your pick.

      --
      "It's a trick. Get an axe."
    22. Re:Bled Alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's cruel. If you want to humanely kill the crabs before bleeding them, go ahead. Or better yet, use that human brain that you think is so smart and fabricate your own substitute.

    23. Re:Bled Alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      From TFA: "In particular, biologist Ding Jeak Ling from the National University of Singapore succeeded in producing the key bacterial detection enzyme, known as Factor C, in yeast. He licensed the process to Lonza, which has brought it to market as a product called PyroGene. A German company named Hyglos has been working on another synthetic endotoxin detector, too. Other, even more advanced technologies are on the way, too."
      See links therein. Plus it's rather odd that it's cruel to bleed them, release them in a manner to avoid rebleeding them right away so at worst 70% survive, but it's not cruel to kill them.

    24. Re: Bled Alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If human blood was taken forcibly rather then donated I think the headlines would start at 'bleed alive' and go much darker.

    25. Re:Bled Alive? by blackicye · · Score: 2

      I'm surprised that they even release these crabs instead of just bleeding them dry.

      Big pharma is really not a shining beacon of ethics and compassion.

    26. Re:Bled Alive? by sharknado · · Score: 1

      At least he's not misusing apostrophes when making fun of someone's spelling. :)

    27. Re: Bled Alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't some places force blood tests?

    28. Re:Bled Alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big pharma is more interested in bleeding the patients dry.

    29. Re:Bled Alive? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      There is (or at least was recently) a significant problem with poaching though.

      It's relevant because their eggs are an important sustenance to a migratory bird that loads up for a flight from their habitat (central east coast of US) to south america. I do believe efforts have been made to reduce the poaching, as not just the birds, but obviously humans too, need these creatures.

      http://www.npr.org/templates/s... puts the issue more with climate change than poaching though, so maybe reports of poaching/not bleeding and releasing as is supposed to be done were grossly exaggerated.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    30. Re:Bled Alive? by leonardluen · · Score: 1

      i suppose you are a member of peta? people for the ethical treatment of apostrophes

    31. Re: Bled Alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but God help you if you accidentally give them your phone number and end up on their "friendly reminder" to donate calling list. Nonstop calls; they aren't subject to "Do Not Call" registries; and all those internet social justice warriors end up branding you as the bad guy for not donating - especially if you have O NEG blood - even if your donor status changes (rabies shots, in my case).

    32. Re:Bled Alive? by cavebison · · Score: 1

      Also, as any biologist (or intelligent human) is aware, there is NO SUCH THING as a 'forgettable' creature.

      Whilst we "intelligent humans" debate invented concepts like "morality", other creatures of nature carry on doing things to each other that we can only begin to have nightmares about. The only reason we worry about hurting other animals is because we are social creatures and therefore wired for empathy - but only for our own survival, not for any other reason. Ethics & morality exist purely for our benefit. Where it happens to benefit other creatures is purely incidental.

    33. Re:Bled Alive? by Optali · · Score: 1

      I am concerned that this will be used as an opportunity by extremists such as NASI GORENG for their own means.

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    34. Re:Bled Alive? by Optali · · Score: 0

      Well, because there may be too many people in the world and I seriously don see why we should spend any extra effort in an anumal that's a plague.

      I'm not making a joke, it really is my opinion. I seriously consider Heinlein's Spaceship Trooper's society to be a seriously good option.

      And a crab that has survived hundreds of millions of years may be more valuable than an retarded redneck so fat he can't even lace his own shoes.

      And there are 7000 Millions of bald apes on the planet. Too much waste in biomass if you ask me.

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    35. Re:Bled Alive? by Optali · · Score: 1

      Use humans instead? ;) (yeah, me bad)

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    36. Re:Bled Alive? by Optali · · Score: 1

      Oh well, and you forgot to write that caviar is a luxury food. Oh, it has nothing to do with the issue discussed? Well, neither does you answer.

      The OP comment of no creature being "forgettable" was not about morality or the reasons for morality but about biology, ecology, diversity of species and their role in the ecosystems and / or there interest from a mere biologocial/zoological point of view... and here the horseshoe crab is actually quite an interesting animal being a living fossil...

      I don't see what this all has to do with morality, do you see it?

      --
      -- 29A the number of the Beast
    37. Re:Bled Alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you call everyone a moron?

    38. Re:Bled Alive? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Use humans instead?

      Or use proteins derived from human blood and/ or immune system components. (Which may be just what the other companies looking at this procedure are doing.)

      (yeah, me bad)

      Why? Common sense proposition on slashdot? Yeah - hand in your membership card then go out and gut yourself. Common sense isn't popular here.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    39. Re: Bled Alive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why are you still here? Or is it only other people that aren't good enough for the planet?

  2. "Forgettable sea creature" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    At least it's a crappy Atlantic columnist making this horrific observation instead of the scientist who discovered this.

    1. Re:"Forgettable sea creature" by raydobbs · · Score: 1

      Agreed - article tagged !forgettableseacreature

    2. Re:"Forgettable sea creature" by NIK282000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      There is nothing forgettable about horseshoe crabs. They are older than dinosaurs, the oldest fossils of horseshoe crabs are 450M years old!

      --
      Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    3. Re:"Forgettable sea creature" by murkwood7 · · Score: 1

      ... a forgettable Atlantic columnist...

      There, fixed that for ya!

      --
      - X/Y -
    4. Re:"Forgettable sea creature" by laejoh · · Score: 1

      Let's call them "Elder Things" then!

    5. Re:"Forgettable sea creature" by fuzzywig · · Score: 1

      You would say that today when I don't have mod points to give you.

  3. Strong arguement for the preservation of species by m00sh · · Score: 1

    There are many people who say that we should let endangered species die out because they are unfit in the current environment and it is just natural for them to die off.

    This proves that some species could hold an amazing adaptation that could completely change how we live.

  4. This is not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And this is not TIL on reddit.

    The technique has been used for years.

  5. Postmodern technology? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why is it postmodern technology? Because it deconstructs the cells? ;-)

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
    1. Re:Postmodern technology? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that "postmodern technology" would by definition be science fiction.

    2. Re:Postmodern technology? by gandhi_2 · · Score: 2

      Because it isn't bad technology, it simply made bad choices.

    3. Re:Postmodern technology? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1


      Why is it postmodern technology? Because it deconstructs the cells? ;-)

      Nah, 'cause it was barely 'modern' six years ago when PBS did a special on the process.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  6. WTF ? by vikingpower · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I mean, really: wtf ??

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  7. Rabbits were used first by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Informative

    Before this discovery, they used to inject rabbits with the substance being tested, and measured if the rabbits got a fever. It was obviously not a great way to do things. Wasn't very quantifiable or sensitive. Source.

    Another bit of trivia: one of the other major commercial uses of horseshoe crabs is cutting them up for bait. Works well for that, but you obviously use up the crabs quickly. So we can inconvenience them for a life-saving medical wonder, or we can kill them for a few pounds of fish to eat. Naturally, using them as bait has not been outlawed.

    One last bit of trivia: this isn't really news. I mean, I obviously find it cool, but seriously, 1960 was the discovery. Beta isn't bad enough, now they're altering the content too?

    1. Re:Rabbits were used first by Peristaltic · · Score: 4, Informative

      One last bit of trivia: this isn't really news. I mean, I obviously find it cool, but seriously, 1960 was the discovery. Beta isn't bad enough, now they're altering the content too?

      I, for one, cannot wait until the story headlined: "Justin Beiber's Totally RAD new computer!" hits the front page.

      Maybe a new poll: "What color is your iPad?"

    2. Re:Rabbits were used first by otc-lame · · Score: 1

      One last bit of trivia: this isn't really news. I mean, I obviously find it cool, but seriously, 1960 was the discovery. Beta isn't bad enough, now they're altering the content too?

      Perhaps they're trying to steal this awesome column from hackaday. I really wish they'd quite trying to make slashdot into something it's not...

    3. Re:Rabbits were used first by mythosaz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Along the same lines, I imagine kids today have no idea what The Rabbit Done Died means.

      I recall watching MASH* as a kid and still knowing the reference. I imagine it's all but forgotten today.

      [Wikipedia tells me S6, Ep19...]

    4. Re:Rabbits were used first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [medicine] or [bait]

      False dichotomy.

      Not that a false premise ever hinders public policy.

    5. Re:Rabbits were used first by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      "One last bit of trivia: this isn't really news. I mean, I obviously find it cool, but seriously, 1960 was the discovery."

      Who cares. It's clearly stuff that matters, and fits well with the science and technology focus of Slashdot. It's nice to see Slashdot can still post something interesting.

    6. Re:Rabbits were used first by SlippyToad · · Score: 1

      It's like /. was bought by a bunch of old guys.

      --
      One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
    7. Re:Rabbits were used first by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      Actually the capturing of horseshoe crabs has been recently restricted in New Jersey and Deleware and outright banned in Sought Carolina. As it turns out this "forgettable" species provides food in the form of eggs to a number of migratory shorebirds that are in decline. The decline is partially blamed on the over fishing of the horseshoe crab.

    8. Re:Rabbits were used first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before this discovery, they used to inject rabbits with the substance being tested, and measured if the rabbits got a fever.

      Somewhat kinder to the rabbits than the old pregnancy tests, though....

    9. Re:Rabbits were used first by rockout · · Score: 1

      weird, I only knew "the rabbit done died" from Aerosmith's Sweet Emotion. And yeah, I'm old enough to remember that song when it was new. Maybe the MASH* episode isn't as pervasive as you think, even among us older folk.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    10. Re:Rabbits were used first by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Obligatory link for those who don't know what the phrase means. I used Snopes instead of Wikipedia because they actually have a video snippet of the MASH episode in.

    11. Re:Rabbits were used first by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      And invaded by a bunch of teenagers of the "yawn, so what?" generation.

    12. Re:Rabbits were used first by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      I can't remember which I became familiar with first.

      Sweet Emotion came out in '75, before I was much of a music fan. I recall being truly introduced to it in '85 or so. ...but I don't think that I honestly understood the line.

      The MASH episode aired in early '78. We watched MASH in my house, so I'm sure I saw it when it aired, but I'm not sure I had put all the pieces together at the first run of the episode; I was a gradeschooler then.

      Probably shortly after getting acquainted to Sweet Emotion in the mid-80's did I put it all together. I suspect it was a combination of Aerosmith, MASH reruns and getting older.

      *shrug*

  8. Biodiversity and environmentalism by HeckRuler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's one of the big arguments for environmentalism and bio diversity. When push comes to shove you sometimes hear "so what if a few species go extinct? They weren't doing all that well before $BUSINESSACTIVITY, why should we try saving them? Why do I care about this species?". And the answer is that the creature represents a massive chain of thousands to millions of generations of genetic experimentation in real-world real-time environments. We're just starting to open Pandora's box of genetics and culling the biodiversity of the planet could be throwing away truly helpful and useful tools we could use in the future.

    Plus genocide is just sort of a dick move.

    1. Re:Biodiversity and environmentalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can bet your ass that if $BUSINESSACTIVITY benefits from the presence of an endangered specie, that specie will never, EVER go extinct, EVER.

      What we need to do is find a business use case for every endangered specie on the list so we can save them.

      Twisted? Maybe, but you know it would work.

    2. Re:Biodiversity and environmentalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. The whale tourism business is now a billion dollar industry. So now there are businesses that benefit from killing whales and other businesses that suffer from it.
      And apparently, the whale tourism business is pushing for more protection for whales.
      Just like you said.

    3. Re:Biodiversity and environmentalism by geek · · Score: 0

      The best way to keep a species around is to eat it. You'll never see chickens and cows go extinct so long as they are yummy.

      That said, your argument is ridiculous. Species go extinct all the time, regardless of human intervention. It's called natural selection and we're not apart from it. If a species goes extinct because of us then it wasnt fit to live. Likewise if something comes along and kills all of us we werent fit to survive. Those are the breaks.

    4. Re:Biodiversity and environmentalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best way to keep a species around is to eat it.

      Seems to work for whales, sharks, tuna, passenger pigeon, ......

      FFS, do you think before you spew garbage on the internet sometimes?

    5. Re:Biodiversity and environmentalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best way to keep a species around is to farm it.

      Seems to work for whales, sharks, tuna, passenger pigeon, ......

      FFS, do you think before you spew garbage on the internet sometimes?

      FTFY

      It's worked great for bees... Oh wait. Well nuts.

    6. Re:Biodiversity and environmentalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best way to keep a species around is to eat it.

      Is that why the population of Galapogos tortoises exploded once sailors started eating them?

    7. Re:Biodiversity and environmentalism by SlippyToad · · Score: 2

      ". If a species goes extinct because of us then it wasnt fit to live"

      By who?

      Maybe it was fit to cure cancer, and we weren't fit to know that because we're glib dumbasses and wasted them all before we bothered finding out.

      --
      One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
    8. Re:Biodiversity and environmentalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right... Because none of the species humans have hunted have ever gone extinct...

      Holy fuck are you stupid.

    9. Re:Biodiversity and environmentalism by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      That said, your argument is ridiculous. Species go extinct all the time, regardless of human intervention. It's called natural selection and we're not apart from it. If a species goes extinct because of us then it wasnt fit to live. Likewise if something comes along and kills all of us we werent fit to survive. Those are the breaks.

      GP isn't making a value judgment like you are. He's making a utility judgment -- that casting away species before being able to assess their value is short-sighted.

      That said, your argument is ridiculous if generalized. Just because something happens naturally does not mean it's okay if it happens by human will. Take human deaths, for example.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    10. Re:Biodiversity and environmentalism by marcgvky · · Score: 0
      And, when one species moves out of a "specialization pocket", others move in to assume the advantage provided by that specialization gap. Strict environmentalists are really uninformed absolutists; they are as dangerous to civil society as absolutist industrialists.

      You should study the reality behind how ecosystems adapt and reform equilibriums. Fear mongering about runaway ecosystems is a sign of weak minded foolishness.

    11. Re:Biodiversity and environmentalism by ThatAblaze · · Score: 1

      Not so.. Whales almost went extinct. Salmon are still heading that way.

    12. Re:Biodiversity and environmentalism by HeckRuler · · Score: 2

      I'm more or less with you except for a few nuances and that mental turd you threw in there at the end.

      When a species "moves out", is that a euphemism for genocide? Species can literally physically move out of an area for a lot of reasons. Or a species can have their home environment removed. Or their food source could dry up. Sometimes that includes moving into another area, but depending on the scale, it usually just means they all die.

      A species that is a specialist (as opposed to a generalist) usually can't have their "specialization pocket" be filled by someone else. That's the entire point of being a specialist. You out-compete the shit out of anyone that isn't dedicated to whatever niche thing you call your own.

      This was explained to me by a guy at a nature park the other month: During periods of upheval, chaotic change, turbulence, whatnot, generalists are favored. They can better adapt to the change. That's what I was taught in school. But he then went on to point out that during static periods of stability, specialists are favored. They out-compete with others for a desired resource. And it's these species that develop some of the really interesting weird shit. Turns out if you spend a few million generations striving for a specific goal, sometimes they come up with creative solutions. Racoons and cockroaches might do a fantastic job of eating whatever they can get a hold of, but they don't have awesome super-vision like mantis shrimp or, you know, flight. (although, racoons do have neat cold-resistant-yet-sensative fingers)

      You should study the reality behind how ecosystems adapt and reform equilibriums.

      Uh. ok. Will do.

      Anyway, my point here is that while certain species may take advantage of another's demise and "move in", it still means we lose a species that may have useful genetic information. And the sort of creatures that have weird freaky abilities are the exact sort that die off during periods of upheaval.

      Fear mongering about runaway ecosystems is a sign of weak minded foolishness.

      Wut?

      What runaway ecosystems? Who mentioned that? Where are these strict environmentalists you're talking about? Are these crabs eating everything or something?

    13. Re:Biodiversity and environmentalism by riverat1 · · Score: 2

      The best way to keep a species around is to eat it.

      Tell that to the dodo.

    14. Re:Biodiversity and environmentalism by marcgvky · · Score: 0

      Fear mongering about runaway ecosystems is a sign of weak minded foolishness.

      Wut?

      What runaway ecosystems? Who mentioned that? Where are these strict environmentalists you're talking about? Are these crabs eating everything or something?

      "Biodiversity" is a codeword used by eco-elitists, whom are trying to seem intelligent.

      My point is simple, the inhabitants of the planet Earth are constantly in flux. And "preserving everything" is simply a naive and thinly veiled method of stifling human progress.

    15. Re:Biodiversity and environmentalism by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      It's species, not "specie". The s is part of the word.

      Specie is metal currency.

    16. Re:Biodiversity and environmentalism by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Wow, your entire brain just shut down when you read that word didn't it?
      And in the same breath you accuse me of "weak minded foolishness".
      It's kind of a big word but it means something. Here's lemme write it out like simple wikipedia:

      "The useful bit of these horseshoe crabs are one of the reasons that people think we should take care of nature and avoid killing off species. Because you never know when something is going to be useful. "

      My point is simple, the inhabitants of the planet Earth are constantly in flux. And "preserving everything" is simply a naive and thinly veiled method of stifling human progress.

      Well, sure, there's always flux. But the amount of flux certainly goes up and down. The introduction of civilization certainly kicked it up a notch for certain groups. Industrialization kicked it up a few more notches for a larger swath. And it really doesn't look like anything is going to slow that rate of change. Going from 0-60mph in 6 seconds is a fun time while going from 0-60mph in 0.6 seconds can kill you.

      There are certainly those eco-nuts that think we should all live in grass huts or something. I think those people are crazy. And I simply love a good steak too much to fret about feedlot's impact on... whatever. And we certainly won't be able to preserve everything, but I think it's a good thing to strive for. And I don't want to stifle human progress. I am balls to the walls in favor of progress. Indeed, things like the usefulness of the horseshoe crab are a specific example of how biodiversity HELPS human progress.

      Would it ease your anti-environmentalists rampage if I pointed out that keeping species alive in zoos, or keeping samples of their genome are valid ways to preserve their value? You know, genetics wise.

      I think you'd do yourself a favor if you eased up on the knee-jerk reactions. Just because I use words that you don't like doesn't mean I want to tear down society.

  9. Re:Strong arguement for the preservation of specie by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2

    Horseshoe crabs are hardly a forgotten species when they breed on beaches outside your back door...

    Maybe this guy also forgot about the baby fur seals until somebody showed him a picture.

  10. Aren't these an endangered species? by atari2600a · · Score: 1

    We should probably figure out how to breed them in captivity before we go slitting a million throats every 2 years...

    1. Re:Aren't these an endangered species? by drkim · · Score: 1

      They don't kill them - they drain a little blood and release them in an area where they won't be picked up again.

    2. Re:Aren't these an endangered species? by QRDeNameland · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to Wikipedia, they are not an endangered species though there are reports of declining populations. As to breeding them in captivity:

      Raising horseshoe crabs in captivity has proven to be difficult. Some evidence indicates mating only takes place in the presence of the sand or mud in which the horseshoe crab's eggs were hatched. Neither what is in the sand that the crab can sense nor how they sense it is known with certainty.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    3. Re:Aren't these an endangered species? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Seems like a good opportunity for someone to buy a crabby beach and set up a farm. You could harvest blood all year, and probably cheaper than the catch and release approach. If you did it right you might even be able to use the beach as a beach (for people) and during breeding season convert it into a ecotour destination.

    4. Re:Aren't these an endangered species? by kumanopuusan · · Score: 3, Funny

      They're not endangered and they don't have throats. Also, before you ask, they're not crabs and they're not horseshoes.

      --
      Use of the words "good", "bad" or "evil" is almost invariably the result of oversimplification.
    5. Re:Aren't these an endangered species? by ThatAblaze · · Score: 1

      These things are scavengers that roam over a wide area. That kind of organism is difficult to farm.

    6. Re:Aren't these an endangered species? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We could feed them politicians and police, neither of which seem to benefit us much, lately, and would hardly be missed.

      -- greenLed

    7. Re:Aren't these an endangered species? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      So are condors, yet zoos keep them because there isn't much choice.

      $15,000 a quart is often good incentive to try and do difficult things. I'm sure it's difficult to keep them alive while you get them to your factory, bleed them just the right amount, and then take them to a distant location for release too, but it sounds like the companies do it to steer clear of fishing laws. It might well be economical to farm them if the catch and release plan were a little more expensive.

  11. Its just you. by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    " I don't know about you, but the idea that every single person in America who has ever had an injection has been protected because we harvest the blood of a forgettable sea creature with a hidden chemical superpower makes me feel a little bit crazy. This scenario is not even sci-fi, it's postmodern technology.'"

    What? I think you are assuming that we share you beliefs that this is somehow wrong or soemthing? Or are you just marvelled at scietific acomplishments? Or are you the guy with the beret from xkcd, who gets awestruck with danishes?

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  12. Blood type by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The properties of horseshoe crap blood have been known and used for a long, long time. This seems like it is just some sort of press release.
    They have blue blood instead of red blood because they use copper, instead of iron, to move oxygen around their body.

  13. Horse Shoe crabs have been fish bait for years by Brigadier · · Score: 3, Informative

    Horse Shoe crabs area already a depleted resource as they have been used as cheap bait for fishermen for years. The impact being subsequent affects to migratory birds who feast on there eggs. I don't think the pharmacological community have a choice but to treat these crustaceans with the respect due

    http://www.endangeredspeciesin...

    http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature...

  14. Aren't we lucky? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boy, am I glad there are no beings above us on the proverbial food chain to imprison us and literally bleed us alive for their medicine, slaughter us in cruel and unruly fashion to feed on, and generally treat us like we're "things" and not living creatures.

    1. Re:Aren't we lucky? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and literally bleed us alive for their medicine

      And millions of people voluntarily give blood to blood banks every year to save lives. If you were trolling, that was a terrible troll. If you were serious, you may want to rethink what you just stated.

    2. Re:Aren't we lucky? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      Don't work for a major corporation hey?

    3. Re:Aren't we lucky? by maharvey · · Score: 1

      It's good to be the king(s)!

  15. half a million horseshoe crabs are captured by BisuDagger · · Score: 1

    Quoting the article: "Each year, half a million horseshoe crabs are captured and bled alive" I think this makes them far from endangered although that is quite a lot of crabs to be caught by one company. Good riddance I say! Who wants a giant shelled scorpion spider crawling in our shallow waters anyway?

  16. Horseshoe crabs are bugs by Danathar · · Score: 1

    I don't think very many people eat them (not much meat on em) and as far as intelligence goes, maybe as about as intelligent as your average flying invertebrate?

  17. Sensationalist Headline much? by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Informative

    When I go to donate blood, am I in a room of people being "Bled Alive"? Technically yes but there's a good reason that term is not used to draw people to donate blood, and is also rather a bit much in this case too.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Sensationalist Headline much? by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      I suppose if you have 30% of your blood extracted, and have a 10-30% chance of dying, then you are bled alive.

    2. Re:Sensationalist Headline much? by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      Depends. If you're kidnapped to the blood donation center and had your skin pierced and blood forcibly "removed" (I try not to use "bleed") from your body, while you are not dead yet, I suppose it fits the definition of being "bled alive".

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    3. Re:Sensationalist Headline much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose if you have 30% of your blood extracted, and have a 10-30% chance of dying, then you are bled alive.

      I donate 50% of my blood volume each year (the article says it's less often than annual, but isn't specific), however I haven't died, so I guess that doesn't count.

    4. Re:Sensationalist Headline much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a difference between your example and the horseshoe crab situation. You are willingly giving your blood; that room of people is there by choice. However, we are forcefully taking the blood from the crabs. They are completely different situations and while there is obviously nothing is wrong or unethical about humans willingly giving blood, the same cannot be said for taking blood from these crabs.

    5. Re:Sensationalist Headline much? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      We need to run an education campaign to convince horseshoe crabs to sign consent forms.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    6. Re:Sensationalist Headline much? by N1AK · · Score: 1

      and have a 10-30% chance of dying

      Even if that was a line in the sand it's irrelevant given that ~97% of horseshoe crabs survive.

  18. Ummm perhaps... by voodoo+cheesecake · · Score: 1

    I would call it "post-modern" if we had figured out how to synthesize coagulogen in the lab - negating the need for harvesting horseshoe crabs. Pssst, don't spread the word about GFP (Green Fluorescent Protein) was discovered.

  19. This is a story form the 1970's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is this on Slashdot? This was news in the 1970's. Did some shill get an article published?

  20. Re: Horse Shoe crabs have been fish bait for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    feast on THEIR eggs

  21. They are kept alive, and donate only once. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A small amount of blood is taken in a very careful manner, after which the creatures are released back into the sea. This harvesting is done only on adults, and iirc only once per year or so.

  22. do some reading before making comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These creatures are carefully caught and put in a device where a small amount of blood is drawn, similar to when a human donates blood. then they are carefully put back into the sea. This harvesting is done only once per year or something like that.

    1. Re:do some reading before making comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do some reading before making comments

      Eat your own words and read the comment that you're commenting on. He's not saying drawing blood from horseshoe crabs is bad or that it affects biodiversity or the horseshoe crab population. What he's saying is that we shouldn't let other species go extinct, because they could end up having some amazing benefit, like the horseshoe crab. This discovery was made in 1960...what if the horseshoe crab had gone extinct in 1959?

  23. Causing a migrating bird crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Horseshoe crabs are now grossly over fished; some for medical and some for eel bait. The rarer they get, the higher the price and the more fishermen want them, thus resulting is a crash.

    The crash destroyed the food supply of a rare shorebird called the Red Knot that depends on horseshoe crab eggs in the Spring during their migration. So they arrive exhausted and hungry in the DelMar area, but there is now no food. So the population of Red Knots has crashed.

  24. Re: Horse Shoe crabs have been fish bait for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see nothing in the first link that suggests that horseshoe crabs are endangered.

    Quite frankly, I would be surprised if they were even close. Multitudes wash up on the beaches in SW Florida routinely after high tide.

  25. Hank Hill says: by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

    "This is exactly what those environmentalists should be spending their time on: Finding ways to use nature against other forms of nature that are inconvenient to man."

  26. Postmodern? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    Do you mean it's described in meaningless subjective polysyllabic dialog and the results are a social construct?

    Surely NOT. This is a scientific result. Rational, objective and modernist to the core.

    1. Re:Postmodern? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean it's described in meaningless subjective polysyllabic dialog and the results are a social construct?

      Surely NOT. This is a scientific result. Rational, objective and modernist to the core.

      I think the real explanation is that the person who abused the term "postmodern" is a hipster. The telltale verbiage is all over the piece. In fact, I would have had a bingo if he had just said "utterly triumphant".

    2. Re:Postmodern? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the Atlantic, no points for guessing the author is a hipster.

  27. Re: Horse Shoe crabs have been fish bait for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Luckily, the litmus test for the health of a species isn't whether or not some dude says "I see a bunch in this one place".

  28. Just silly. by meglon · · Score: 2

    "Alexis Madrigal at the Atlantic: 'The marvelous thing about horseshoe crab blood, though, isn't the color."

    I'd suggest color be damned, the marvelous thing about them is that their blood isn't iron based, but copper based; 1 - a clear proof of convergent evolution; 2 - just really damn neat; and, 3 - proof that Spock, having deep green blood, must not be from a species that uses copper as a blood base (a fantastic way to make diehard trekkies squirm).

    --
    Fascism: An authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. See also: NAZI's
  29. Re:Strong arguement for the preservation of specie by Rich0 · · Score: 1

    I remember watching an environmental video in 1994 or so that featured the horseshoe crab for precisely this reason. They're actually a remarkable creature - I think they're only indigenous to the Delmarva region and they're basically living fossils. The blood is collected without harming the crab.

  30. News? by RedShoeRider · · Score: 3, Informative
    As someone said, it's not exactly new. LAL testing has been boilerplate standard for better than 20 years now.

    From a lab tech's point of view, LAL testing is brilliant. Mix 10mL of some sample that's supposedly "clean" into a premade LAL test kit. Snap the lid shut. Shake. Incubate for a day. If it changes color, it's positive for endotoxins. If it stays clear, it's negative. Simple as that. And being that the sensitivity is picograms/mL, it's great. Knowing the backstory is neat, too, from the tech's view. Which I am.

    --

    Chris Knight is my hero.

    1. Re:News? by ThatAblaze · · Score: 2

      That's great. Awesome. Knowing your profession is neat too, from a completely random stranger's point of view. Which I am.

    2. Re:News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Also, I am testing emotions for the Beta :)

  31. WTF? "forgettable sea creature"? by Morpeth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously? Such an enlightened attitude.

    Actually one of the strongest memories I have as a young child was coming across a horseshoe crab at a beach, it was in shallow water -- and it both scared the sh*t out of me, and had me intensely fascinated for a good long while. When an adult picked it up so I could see its underside and all those moving legs, I was absolutely, positively, enthralled. Nothing forgettable about it...

    --

    'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
    1. Re:WTF? "forgettable sea creature"? by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

      A lack of amazement at Nature is a tragedy of epic proportions.

      ALL tech comes from studying Nature. Take more and more people farther and farther away from it, and watch the inevitable decline...

  32. Re: Horse Shoe crabs have been fish bait for years by Wookact · · Score: 2

    Well I am sorry but the wikipedia article for the horshoe crab found off the Atlantic and gulf coasts state that they are not presently endangered.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...

  33. Re: Horse Shoe crabs have been fish bait for years by ThatAblaze · · Score: 1

    Litmus test doesn't mean what you seem to think it means.

  34. Re: Horse Shoe crabs have been fish bait for years by gnick · · Score: 1

    Yeah... It does...

    litmus test ...
    2. Fig. A question or experiment that seeks to determine the state of one important factor. His performance on the long exam served as a litmus test to determine whether he would go to college. The amount of white cells in my blood became the litmus test for diagnosing my disease.

    However I would submit that anyone using the phrase, "I see a bunch in this one place," would fail the litmus test regarding whether or not he's qualified to diagnose the health of a species.

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  35. Survivors by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Horseshoe crabs have been around for more than 400 million years. There are not many limbed animals that have survived with mostly the same design for that long. They are a wonder of nature. In the tech world, they would be roughly comparable to IBM System/360-dirived mainframes....except they still have the same horse-power, or should I say horse-shoe power.

  36. Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't been to the doctor in well over a year, and it was a year old National Geographic that I read this in at the time.

    Get with the times and pick up a magazine for the latest news!

  37. Not an endangered species any more. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Here's how it went down...

    Every year since before I was born the horseshoe crabs have swarmed and spawned. Big Business (in the form of the tourism industry) hated this and encouraged farmers to grind them up for fertilizer - they literally ran heavy equipment up and down the beach scraping up the crabs, and farmers lined up with their trucks to take the crabs away and run them through grinders. Naturally, tax dollars funded a lot of this.

    Then somebody found a pharma use for their blood.

    Between the farmers, the hotels, and the pharma boys the crabs started getting killed faster than they breed... at which point Big Pharma had laws passed. (The only reason Delaware politics aren't considered outrageously corrupt is because New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Maryland are right next door - everything's relative.) Now the hotels are out of the harvesting picture entirely (they push the crab spawning as a "nature tourism" event instead) and the farmers' harvests are strictly limited, and Big Pharma uses sustainable harvesting (bleeding) practices.

    Totally true story. I was there for the whole thing, I played with horseshoe crabs as a child in the 1960s and I still live in the area.

    So yes, they were very briefly endangered, but aren't any more. Because GOVERNMENT - otherwise it would have gone totally "tragedy of the commons" like silphium did. Suck that slashdot Randroids!

  38. Stay Away From Our Crabs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am from South Jersey ... Stay away from our crabs. They are ours. Go Away!!

    Piney

  39. Re: Horse Shoe crabs have been fish bait for years by rockout · · Score: 1

    Litmus test doesn't mean what you seem to think it means.

    Gee, why bother with a dictionary, when you can just link to "Litmus_test_(politics)" on wikipedia to try to make your erroneous point?

    --
    I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
  40. Re: Horse Shoe crabs have been fish bait for years by rockout · · Score: 0
    The very sentence you linked to contains this tidbit:

    harvesting and habitat destruction have reduced its numbers at some locations and caused some concern for this animal's future.

    So okay, not technically endangered, by the scientific definition, but certainly the "near threatened" status would suggest that it's a good idea to not just kill them indiscriminately. In fact, wouldn't that be a good idea regardless?

    --
    I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
  41. Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would have spelled it 'idiosyncrosy'. Thanks for teaching me something, slashdotters!

  42. The 'Unparalleled Biomedical Technology' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would completely useless without the medicine in the needle

  43. Re: Horse Shoe crabs have been fish bait for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, their talking about the eggs over there

  44. Re: Horse Shoe crabs have been fish bait for years by Wookact · · Score: 2
    Yet you ignored the preceding sentences to pick that tid bit out. You also fail to understand that they are NOT KILLING THEM. They take some blood and then release them far from where they are capturing them to harvest the blood. THe very WIki article I linked to describes this in detail if you so choose.

    LAL is obtained from the animals' blood. Horseshoe crabs are returned to the ocean after bleeding, although some 3% die during the process. Studies show the blood volume returns to normal in about a week, though blood cell count can take two to three months to fully rebound.[24]

    So three percent of them die, Frankly I am not that worried about that.

  45. Re: Horse Shoe crabs have been fish bait for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be 'them there' eggs for that use case.

    In American, at least.

  46. Re: Horse Shoe crabs have been fish bait for years by ksheff · · Score: 1

    Then it would make sense for the pharma companies to set up horseshoe crab farms where the crabs are raised specifically for their blood. That would also allow them to know exactly when blood was last collected from a batch of crabs.

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  47. Re: Horse Shoe crabs have been fish bait for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    only south americans speak like that

  48. Re:Strong arguement for the preservation of specie by GumphMaster · · Score: 1

    "The blood is collected without harming the crab." Except, of course, for the (self-reported) 10-30% that TFA says die from the procedure or those females with potentially altered fertility. At least synthesised alternatives are in the (patent-encumbered) mill so the critters can just be left in peace.

    --
    Patent litigation: A doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction... in which everyone seems willing to push the button
  49. Leave them alone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I grew up near the South Jersey shore and have seen Horseshoe Crabs in real life on the beach many times. They are funky looking, but these are some serioulsy old life forms. They also were already having population problems because of people destroying their habitat when I moved from New Jersey 20+ years ago. This things have lived for millions of years, so these guys can bleed them dry to test liquids? WTF?

    "because we harvest the blood of a forgettable sea creature"... said the narcissistic a-hole who deserves the same treatment. I also find it interesting when I hear/read people use the term harvest for animals as they try to make what they are doing seem somehow less violent or painful for the things being killed.

    These crabs are not super big. I can not expect they have a ton of blood in them. So they have a very good way of defending against bacterial infection. Great for them. Unfortunately dumb humans are the things killing them off. I was pretty happy tonight till I read this article.

    1. Re: Leave them alone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As always I should have read some of the comments before posting my own. Looks like you all hit on my points and concerns. If they don't kill them in the process of the research I am much more in favor of it.

  50. New administration method: by boddhisatva · · Score: 2

    They place them on your face where they attach themselves but eventually fall off. Your blood is highly acidic then but it kills all bacteria and viruses.

  51. Re:Strong arguement for the preservation of specie by N1AK · · Score: 1

    This proves that some species could hold an amazing adaptation that could completely change how we live.

    But by trying to keep the world the same as it was 30 years ago we will invariably cause other species to die out and stop the evolution of other species that are better adapted to current conditions. My biggest, and basically only, issue with 'conservationism' is that is anti-change for anti-change's sake. Why are we re-introducing some animals to areas where they died out hundreds of years ago but not ones that died out thousands or millions of years ago? It's arbitrary nonsense to pretend that the world should look like it did at another point in time.

    All that said, I'm for minimising our impact on the environment where practical, and to a greater extent than we currently do, but mainly because I don't want us to screw it up too badly not because I care whether Pandas die out.

  52. Re: Horse Shoe crabs have been fish bait for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many fisherman can I catch with a Horse Shoe crab?

  53. Re: Horse Shoe crabs have been fish bait for years by rockout · · Score: 1

    No, I understand entirely that they're not killing them. I say that's a good thing. I'm also not worried about 3% of them dying as that certainly seems reasonable when compared against the benefits of harvesting their blood. I was merely commenting on the fact that you seemed to be representing their status as not endangered at all - when that's the only sentence you write, you come off as someone that's annoyed by the fact that we're not just killing them, instead of the catch-and-release that actually is going on.

    If I was incorrect about your point of view, I apologize, but maybe next provide a little more context - that way you won't have to jump down someone's throat and start typing in all caps like a 12-year-old.

    --
    I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
  54. Ahem... by McFly777 · · Score: 1

    Southerners, not South Americans. One is in the south end of the North American continent (not including Mexico), the other is a completely different continent which is south of the equator.

    As to horseshoe crabs, they are facinating creatures. When I was growing up, one of my brothers had the remains of one, amazingly well preserved (I guess that might happen with an exoskeleton). For what it is worth, the remains were found already dead on the beach. Once you got over the "fishy" smell, one could look at all the structures of the creature, or at least the external ones. It was years later, as an adult, that I first saw one alive at an aquarium. Other than the fact that it moved, there was no visible difference.

    Ok, the above sounds rather stupid, but this is all relating to my memories as a less-than 8-year-old.

    My hope is that the fact that there is a living harvest element will promote their protection/conservation (or whatever the right word is for not killing them).

    --

    McFly777
    - - -
    "What do people mean when they say the computer went down on them?" -Marilyn Pittman
  55. Living fossils - imperceptible evolution by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    What is more remarkable, is that these creatures have been around for hundreds of millions of years, almost unchanged. They only seem to have grown tails over this period.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  56. Re: Horse Shoe crabs have been fish bait for years by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

    If endanger species followed the free market, the demand for this treatment (if it was worthwhile) would drive people to farm them.

    And then they wouldn't be endangered anymore.

  57. I warn you, take your hands away from those crabs by Optali · · Score: 1

    This was already tried by the Japanese in the 60's with alarming results.

    I would seriously discourage the US scientist of continuing with their experiments.

    Here you can see a documentary about the experiments:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...

    --
    -- 29A the number of the Beast
  58. Should this be viewed as blood clotting? by bbsalem · · Score: 1

    The OP didn't quote the part of the Atlantic article that explained what the adaptation of the gel that forms from Horseshoe Crab blood is for. It sounds roughly analogous to what blood clotting in many animals does to protect them from infection from an open wound. It is the same sort of thing. The blood, blue because many crustacians use Cu instead of Fe in the O binding protein of their blood, protects the relatively open circulatory system of these arthropods from bacteria.

    Back in the day, Cambrian day, the animals like these were trilobites that were fed upon by predators that could crack the exoskeleton with pincers and claws to eat the soft parts within. That risk along with incidental puncture of the exoskeleton would make the circulation vulnerable to pathogens, so that even if you survived an accident the breach in your armor might kill you from infection, so that explains the adaptation.

    So, why are these blue bloods, using Cu instead of Fe, which makes our blood red? This is true of lobsters as well. The arthropods appeared in the Earliest Cambrian although there is evidence for them before the Cambrian Explosion. There is a beast in the Edicarian Fauna of Australia that has the same three part body plan of the trilobites and ultimately the horseshoe crab, and most of the extant isopoda, including the pill bug. These animals might have been around in the late Precambrian. Although this is well after the Fe was oxidized out of the oceans, causing the worldwide ironstone, banded iron deposits. Their blood may have evolved to use the more soluable salts of Cu. The problem is the protean that uses Cu is less effective than Hemoglobin, that uses Fe, for carrying O in the blood. The arthropods we know retained the ancestral material because they were not so active as to need the more efficient protean in their blood.

  59. Re: Horse Shoe crabs have been fish bait for years by Wookact · · Score: 1
    Your previous post:

    t's a good idea to not just kill them indiscriminately

    Did not lead me to believe you understood entirely. So yes I did type that part in caps to emphasize that fact. I will keep it in mind to use the bold tags in the future.

    I do not condone just killing animals for no reason, but killing 3% of the horeshoe crabs (for a good reason) does not even show up on my radar. My main point with the one liner is that they are not nearly as endangered/threatened as the person I was replying to had implied.

    If the animals were actually endangered I would not be in favor of catching wild ones, but I would probably be in favor of trying to breed them in some sort of horeshoe crab farm if that was possible. Shoot maybe they even taste good.