I did find a tutorial but it seemed very limited. And I didn't see anything on putting in logic. It could just be me since I have always found DBMS to be annoying. SQL and a programing language always suited me better for some reason.
OO.org works pretty well me but I am not really a big user. I would love to see a feature list. Also I would really like to see Base fleshed out. Or at least better documented. I have tired to play with it but it just makes me nuts.
Maybe but a lot of Windows 95 programs have been updated to run under XP. It is still insane to prevent programs from writing data files to the program files directory. I just don't get it. Or how about allowing certain programs to do it and not others?
Frankly I found Wikileaks to be unethical for a while. Why not post. "We found nothing but personal information and photographs". Wouldn't protecting other peoples rights be the ETHICAL THING TO DO! Their reputation is now that they are unethical and I trust them to publish what every trash they get in the most inflammatory way possible.
You want to tell me that there was nothing less personal than that email and photo in the emails? Please.
But.. And this is the big one. I agree for new code. But the only real strength of Windows is it's legacy of applications. It is supposed to run old software. And if you have ever supported average users let me explain why a good program could have problems. Lets say you have 10,000 users using your program under Windows 95. You store their files under Program Files, Program name, User Now more and more people buy your software and then XP hits. It recomends that you move those data files to My Documents. Well Now you have 50,000 users. Do you make them move them? Do you give yourself a support headache buy have some people with files under My Documents and some under Program Files... Now comes Vista and it throws a fit if you store a data file under Program files Which if they are none executable I don't see what the problem is. So you simply tell people to turn off the UAC.
Of course your customers start having problems with Sound cards, USB to serial devices, and performance issues with Vista anyway so....
Your right no new program should have a problem with the UAC. But most programs are not new and may have an established customer base.
A netbook with a dual core Atom for only $399. Software available through Itunes and will have the option to use the iPhone as a modem via bluetooth or WiFi.
The mini will be gone. Apple will introduce the Apple Brick. It is a bit bigger than a mini but will have a PCI-E slot to allow you to upgrade your video.
Of course I am totally making this up so if you don't agree who cares.
But if I am right, all bow before the all knowing LWATCDR.
Re:Did Bill Gates pay Shuttleworth to create Ubunt
on
Linux 2.6.27 Out
·
· Score: 1
Yes he is but just is as it is unfair to judge Linux users by this bozo. Actually I have had very few problems with Ubuntu so I have no idea what he is talking about. If you are interested in Linux and stability and security I suggest you look at CentOS. I find it a good combination of ease of use, install, and package management. I find Ubuntu release versions to be also very good and have more cool stuff than CentOS but also just a little bit less stable. I tend to use Ubuntu for my desktop and CentOS for servers but that is just me.
Actually I don't 2.4Ghz transmissions can interfere with GPS. It usually isn't a problem if you are reading the GPS but in flight if the GPS tied to the autopilot then I could see it going into a sudden climb or drive. I could also see it interfering with collision avoidance systems. The EMI isn't messing with the FBW systems but It could mess with GPS. GPS is a very weak signal.
That is for the judge to decide. Yes the mazimume does seem a bit harsh but that is often the case with any crime that is why they are the maximum you know the upper limit... Frankly this entire thing has made me really dislike wikileaks. Why did they post her personal photos? They wasn't news. Or the email from that woman that was having a hard time? None of that was of any value at all. I found that extremely unethical.
I am really disappointed in wikileaks for posting that. There was nothing that was a leak and posting the family photo was just wrong. I guess wikileaks has not respect for privacy at all. Since the photo had NO political content and was completely personal.
1. Palin isn't a congress person. 2. Yes they can search email for an investigation. It is called a court order. 3. She hasn't been convicted of anything.
You really shouldn't get into political discussions unless you at least know the difference between a congress person and a governor.
Umm she is the governor of a small state. She does not have access to anything classified. So it is okay to break the law to catch a crook... To toss out people rights? And let's be honest HE FOUND NOTHING!!!!!! Even though he found nothing he still posted her personal email to the web. Trust me if the son of a republican had done the same thing to Biden people would be after his blood!
Dude most people are as technically illiterate as she is. If anything she is just not paranoid enough. I can program in about 12 languages, hacked the 2.4 kernel to add MMC support for a XScale single board computer, and have more computers than people at my home. My yahoo mailbox is just about as secure. I use it for junk only. But it is just as insecure. It never crossed my mind that anyone would would try and figure out what my first car was.
Actually nope your wrong again. someone from the company posted that they did test it for hail. They didn't give any real info about the hail size that they tested too but since this guy says they used a paint ball gun it is not very large. So nope they do attend to mount them naked from what the guy from the company posted.
Up to what size hail? Not an issue where I live since we don't have a lot of big hail. Asking the question is not bogosity giving an answer with out facts is. Since it looks like you are the only one here that has any facts thank you for the answer.
Well window very rarely take the impact from hail. The are protected by the roof and are vertical. You cars windshield is safety glass and is very thick. Do you know for a fact that these tubes are as strong as a car windshield? Or are just posting a none fact to a valid question.
So it will be about a third of the night time base load. Natural gas is almost never used a base load. The renewables are iffy. Solar is zero at night wind is an unknown and will vary, The Geothermal is base load.
If the previews had the dock in them and they had not yet filed the patent then they are invalid. You can not show something then file the patent for it.
"a) not everybody lives in the US" This car is currently only in the US. "b) though obviously this will be offered in cars here..." Maybe but maybe not. "c) there is a sizeable number of two lane undivided roads here with speed limit of ~70mph" So if the truck is going 80 or even 70 then there is no good reason to pass it. "d) yeah, yeah, that's 10mph less...seriously, don't you people know how to properly overtake on such road? You accelerate WAY before actual overtaking to spend the least amount of time possible on "wrong" lane. Also when overtaking, something doing, say, 60mph" Yes we do but would a teenager? Also even with that limit you would still have +20 to overtake and pass. Do you think teen and 80+ MPH on a two lane undivided highway would be safe??? Not on your life. BUT if you do then give him the unrestricted key. That is the great thing. The parents can decide. If where you live you feel that the restrictions would be dangerous then don't use them!!!!!!!! But I would still question the wisdom of that pass as you describe it.
Actually you sir are clueless. "Teenagers need to be practicing setting their own responsibilities and limits. " No they have to practice making decisions. society sets up responsibilities and limits and consequences for everybody. Parents set up a sub set of those for children and also determine the consequences of failing. "Seriously, traditional societies recognize adulthood at, like 13. That's when you're physically mature. The more you fight that physical maturity vs. 2nd-class-citizenhood, the more fucked-up and schizophrenic people will become." You are idiot... You think a 13 year old has reached physical maturity? Go find a 13 year old and stand them next to a 25 year old. A 13 year old will be smaller and weaker on average. They are no where near physically mature. They are also not mentally mature. And they with out a doubt a long way for intellectually mature. This isn't a bad thing. They are supposed to be. The only people that think a 13 year old is physically mature are perverts that want to have sex with them..
"What about when you overtake some big f***ing truck on two lane road (each lane going in different direction; this kind of road is typical where I live) and situation arises when you're doing 80 already," The safety isn't important at all. There isn't a two lane undivided road in the US with a speed limit of 80 that I know about. Also if you are already doing 80 why do you need to pass?
"Additionally.. what happens if your kid, or someone around him, is in an emergency, and must push the car to its limit." You kid will not have the skill to push the car to the limit and live.Not only that but what???? Life isn't a Rambo movie. It isn't likely that you kid will have to flee from a bunch of bad guys in a Hind. "I'm sure californians will feel very safe knowing they can't access every single horsepower to get off that bridge before it collapses in an earthquake." You do live in a fantasy world don't you. Odds are ever one will stop. Your best safey factor in that case really isn't more HP but better brakes and tires. You have about 0.000000000001% that even if you where on the bridge that you could manage to drive your way out of trouble. But if you where heading to that bridge good brakes could keep you from driving into trouble. So yea everything you said was pretty dumb.
I don't think that even in Finland they are chocking the power on cars. Some high end cars do have top speed limiters. Those are for safety. The issue is that the those cars are so heavy that there are no tires that rated for their weight and top speed. So they regulate down the top speed to match the rated speed of the tires available. Those limits are pretty freaking fast though. Often in the 140+MPH area. Now motorcycles are limited to 186 MPH by a gentleman's agreement between the manufactures.
Slashdot Mirror
I did find a tutorial but it seemed very limited. And I didn't see anything on putting in logic. It could just be me since I have always found DBMS to be annoying. SQL and a programing language always suited me better for some reason.
OO.org works pretty well me but I am not really a big user.
I would love to see a feature list.
Also I would really like to see Base fleshed out. Or at least better documented.
I have tired to play with it but it just makes me nuts.
Maybe but a lot of Windows 95 programs have been updated to run under XP.
It is still insane to prevent programs from writing data files to the program files directory.
I just don't get it. Or how about allowing certain programs to do it and not others?
Frankly I found Wikileaks to be unethical for a while.
Why not post. "We found nothing but personal information and photographs".
Wouldn't protecting other peoples rights be the ETHICAL THING TO DO!
Their reputation is now that they are unethical and I trust them to publish what every trash they get in the most inflammatory way possible.
You want to tell me that there was nothing less personal than that email and photo in the emails? Please.
But..
And this is the big one. I agree for new code. But the only real strength of Windows is it's legacy of applications.
It is supposed to run old software. And if you have ever supported average users let me explain why a good program could have problems.
Lets say you have 10,000 users using your program under Windows 95. You store their files under Program Files, Program name, User
Now more and more people buy your software and then XP hits. It recomends that you move those data files to My Documents. Well Now you have 50,000 users. Do you make them move them?
Do you give yourself a support headache buy have some people with files under My Documents and some under Program Files...
Now comes Vista and it throws a fit if you store a data file under Program files Which if they are none executable I don't see what the problem is.
So you simply tell people to turn off the UAC.
Of course your customers start having problems with Sound cards, USB to serial devices, and performance issues with Vista anyway so....
Your right no new program should have a problem with the UAC. But most programs are not new and may have an established customer base.
A netbook with a dual core Atom for only $399. Software available through Itunes and will have the option to use the iPhone as a modem via bluetooth or WiFi.
The mini will be gone. Apple will introduce the Apple Brick. It is a bit bigger than a mini but will have a PCI-E slot to allow you to upgrade your video.
Of course I am totally making this up so if you don't agree who cares.
But if I am right, all bow before the all knowing LWATCDR.
Yes he is but just is as it is unfair to judge Linux users by this bozo.
Actually I have had very few problems with Ubuntu so I have no idea what he is talking about.
If you are interested in Linux and stability and security I suggest you look at CentOS.
I find it a good combination of ease of use, install, and package management. I find Ubuntu release versions to be also very good and have more cool stuff than CentOS but also just a little bit less stable.
I tend to use Ubuntu for my desktop and CentOS for servers but that is just me.
Actually I was told by a patent lawyer that we where not allowed to show anything in public before the patent application was filed
Actually I don't
2.4Ghz transmissions can interfere with GPS. It usually isn't a problem if you are reading the GPS but in flight if the GPS tied to the autopilot then I could see it going into a sudden climb or drive. I could also see it interfering with collision avoidance systems.
The EMI isn't messing with the FBW systems but It could mess with GPS. GPS is a very weak signal.
That is for the judge to decide. Yes the mazimume does seem a bit harsh but that is often the case with any crime that is why they are the maximum you know the upper limit...
Frankly this entire thing has made me really dislike wikileaks. Why did they post her personal photos? They wasn't news. Or the email from that woman that was having a hard time? None of that was of any value at all. I found that extremely unethical.
I am really disappointed in wikileaks for posting that.
There was nothing that was a leak and posting the family photo was just wrong.
I guess wikileaks has not respect for privacy at all. Since the photo had NO political content and was completely personal.
1. Palin isn't a congress person.
2. Yes they can search email for an investigation. It is called a court order.
3. She hasn't been convicted of anything.
You really shouldn't get into political discussions unless you at least know the difference between a congress person and a governor.
Umm she is the governor of a small state. She does not have access to anything classified. So it is okay to break the law to catch a crook... To toss out people rights?
And let's be honest HE FOUND NOTHING!!!!!!
Even though he found nothing he still posted her personal email to the web.
Trust me if the son of a republican had done the same thing to Biden people would be after his blood!
Dude most people are as technically illiterate as she is. If anything she is just not paranoid enough. I can program in about 12 languages, hacked the 2.4 kernel to add MMC support for a XScale single board computer, and have more computers than people at my home.
My yahoo mailbox is just about as secure. I use it for junk only. But it is just as insecure. It never crossed my mind that anyone would would try and figure out what my first car was.
Actually nope your wrong again.
someone from the company posted that they did test it for hail. They didn't give any real info about the hail size that they tested too but since this guy says they used a paint ball gun it is not very large.
So nope they do attend to mount them naked from what the guy from the company posted.
Up to what size hail?
Not an issue where I live since we don't have a lot of big hail.
Asking the question is not bogosity giving an answer with out facts is.
Since it looks like you are the only one here that has any facts thank you for the answer.
Well window very rarely take the impact from hail. The are protected by the roof and are vertical.
You cars windshield is safety glass and is very thick.
Do you know for a fact that these tubes are as strong as a car windshield?
Or are just posting a none fact to a valid question.
So it will be about a third of the night time base load.
Natural gas is almost never used a base load. The renewables are iffy. Solar is zero at night wind is an unknown and will vary, The Geothermal is base load.
Seems like it but hey programing is programing. I wouldn't call it a completely different arena.
If the previews had the dock in them and they had not yet filed the patent then they are invalid.
You can not show something then file the patent for it.
"a) not everybody lives in the US"
This car is currently only in the US.
"b) though obviously this will be offered in cars here..."
Maybe but maybe not.
"c) there is a sizeable number of two lane undivided roads here with speed limit of ~70mph"
So if the truck is going 80 or even 70 then there is no good reason to pass it.
"d) yeah, yeah, that's 10mph less...seriously, don't you people know how to properly overtake on such road? You accelerate WAY before actual overtaking to spend the least amount of time possible on "wrong" lane. Also when overtaking, something doing, say, 60mph"
Yes we do but would a teenager? Also even with that limit you would still have +20 to overtake and pass. Do you think teen and 80+ MPH on a two lane undivided highway would be safe???
Not on your life.
BUT if you do then give him the unrestricted key.
That is the great thing. The parents can decide.
If where you live you feel that the restrictions would be dangerous then don't use them!!!!!!!!
But I would still question the wisdom of that pass as you describe it.
Actually you sir are clueless.
"Teenagers need to be practicing setting their own responsibilities and limits. "
No they have to practice making decisions. society sets up responsibilities and limits and consequences for everybody. Parents set up a sub set of those for children and also determine the consequences of failing.
"Seriously, traditional societies recognize adulthood at, like 13. That's when you're physically mature. The more you fight that physical maturity vs. 2nd-class-citizenhood, the more fucked-up and schizophrenic people will become."
You are idiot...
You think a 13 year old has reached physical maturity? Go find a 13 year old and stand them next to a 25 year old. A 13 year old will be smaller and weaker on average. They are no where near physically mature.
They are also not mentally mature. And they with out a doubt a long way for intellectually mature.
This isn't a bad thing. They are supposed to be.
The only people that think a 13 year old is physically mature are perverts that want to have sex with them..
"What about when you overtake some big f***ing truck on two lane road (each lane going in different direction; this kind of road is typical where I live) and situation arises when you're doing 80 already,"
The safety isn't important at all.
There isn't a two lane undivided road in the US with a speed limit of 80 that I know about.
Also if you are already doing 80 why do you need to pass?
So you would be much safer NOT passing at all.
"Additionally.. what happens if your kid, or someone around him, is in an emergency, and must push the car to its limit."
You kid will not have the skill to push the car to the limit and live.Not only that but what???? Life isn't a Rambo movie. It isn't likely that you kid will have to flee from a bunch of bad guys in a Hind.
"I'm sure californians will feel very safe knowing they can't access every single horsepower to get off that bridge before it collapses in an earthquake."
You do live in a fantasy world don't you.
Odds are ever one will stop. Your best safey factor in that case really isn't more HP but better brakes and tires.
You have about 0.000000000001% that even if you where on the bridge that you could manage to drive your way out of trouble.
But if you where heading to that bridge good brakes could keep you from driving into trouble.
So yea everything you said was pretty dumb.
I don't think that even in Finland they are chocking the power on cars. Some high end cars do have top speed limiters. Those are for safety. The issue is that the those cars are so heavy that there are no tires that rated for their weight and top speed. So they regulate down the top speed to match the rated speed of the tires available.
Those limits are pretty freaking fast though. Often in the 140+MPH area.
Now motorcycles are limited to 186 MPH by a gentleman's agreement between the manufactures.
As if 186 on street bike isn't fast enough....