Slashdot Mirror


Top Apple Rumors, Bricks, Low Price, NVIDIA

Vigile writes "With the news that Apple will be releasing new MacBook products on October 14th, speculation has begun on what exactly those new products will be. Tips of a manufacturing process involving lasers and a single 'brick' of aluminum are catching on, as is the idea of a sub-$1000 netbook-type device. More interesting might be the persistent rumors of an NVIDIA chipset adoption that would drastically increase gaming ability, allow MacBooks to improve their support for OpenCL and take advantage of the new Adobe CS4 software with GPU acceleration. Will NVIDIA's ailing chipset business get a shot in the arm next week?"

283 comments

  1. Hooray for NVIDIA by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 5, Funny

    God knows that gaming graphics is the only reason left why I'm still hanging on to the PC platform...

    1. Re:Hooray for NVIDIA by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 0

      Likely it will be the low end on board video that uses system ram nvidia video that is better then Intel but still for gameing video but all system should have a DVDRW the $1100 mac book should have one the $600 mini should also have one.

      But they the mac pro will likely come with better cards at $1800 + then system at $1200 - $1500 have. Right now the $2000 mac book pro comes with a mid range card.

      And the mac book black at $1400 + should come with 128 to 256 video ram + a 15" screen.

      The mini should drop to $500 with the $700+ mini getting a real video card as well.

    2. Re:Hooray for NVIDIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Hooray for NVIDIA by spazdor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For the love of God, man, use a comma!

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    4. Re:Hooray for NVIDIA by xbytor · · Score: 1

      "For, the, love, of, God, man, use, a, comma!"

      Fix't.

    5. Re:Hooray for NVIDIA by spazdor · · Score: 5, Funny

      <shatner>"For, the, love, of, God, man, use, a, comma!"</shatner>

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    6. Re:Hooray for NVIDIA by AnXa · · Score: 1

      Your comment doesn't make any sense.

      Apple built computers are Personal Computers aka. PCs. So what if they are called Macs? Dell has XPS machines. Wouldn't it look kind of funny if I'd write that "I have XPS and PC"? Apple ships their computers with just another operating than Microsoft Windows. What makes it special enought to be called PC if computer has Windows? Playstation 3 is a PC, at least when it has Gnu/Linux installed. Those kind of PCs are called HTPCs usually.

      And why are Gnu/Linux software called just Linux software and Mac OS software called Mac software but why the hell is Windows Software called PC Software? It's correct to some level but PC Software means everything from Mac, Linux to Windows, Solaris and so on even to DOS and OS/2 software.

      PC is not a platform, Windows is a platform, Gnu/Linux is a platform, Mac OS X is a platform, and all these operating systems run on a same computer type which was called IBM-PC, or like now, PC for short. 8 years since they stopped calling Windows software as windows software things have really really really gone to the dark hole.

      Besides definition of a PC is following: A personal computer (PC) is any computer whose original sales price, size, and capabilities make it useful for individuals, and which is intended to be operated directly by an end user, with no intervening computer operator.

      I'd add also that it's a type of a computer which manages your personal information flow. But I guess wikipedia's definition holds it inside the context. :)

      Thanks for reading my flames... :P

      --
      -Seeing the problem is ½ of solution-
    7. Re:Hooray for NVIDIA by AnXa · · Score: 1

      Let me add that Mobile Phones are PCs also. Let's not forget about them since they are second most important if not the most important PC devices in the world.

      --
      -Seeing the problem is ½ of solution-
    8. Re:Hooray for NVIDIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the insertion of the superfluous commas is what the tag is meant to do. It is pointless to put the commas in text surrounded by these tags.

    9. Re:Hooray for NVIDIA by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Nope. Got the commas in the wrong places if you are going for The Shat. Here is The Shat version

      For the,Love of God man,Use,a comma!

      When doing The Shat you gotta think WAY over drama. Put some dramatic pauses in there just to beat the line within an inch of it's life while you are at it. This concludes today's lesson on doing the Shat by the Hairyfeet,please get the lights on your way out and Have....A nice....DAY!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    10. Re:Hooray for NVIDIA by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      Your comment doesn't make any sense.

      His argument makes perfect sense. The proof is that you understood what he was saying in it's entirety despite your arrogant, childish, semantics attack. Thanks for the lecture on how the world should be. Welcome back to the world that is: PC means windows. You knew it, so his comment made perfect sense.

      Next time you want to be wise ass, try not to shoot yourself in the foot so obviously. It makes you look like a stupid dick.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
    11. Re:Hooray for NVIDIA by AnXa · · Score: 1

      Nice to see that you understood my point. But your counter argument is so weak that I don't even have to write counter for that.

      Macs are PCs, no matter what Apple or their user base might say. It's just some sort inner defence mechanism of theirs for denying the truth.

      Besides his comment is understood like this:
      "I want to have a personal computer which runs games and looks great, running games is the only reason I am still using this ugly personal computer..."
      And I say what? in this point.

      Besides most Slashdotters are asses so I didn't expect you to be any different. :)

      PC != Windows
      Mac = PC
      XPS = PC
      Pavilion = PC
      E-series = PC
      N-series = PC
      etc..

      --
      -Seeing the problem is ½ of solution-
    12. Re:Hooray for NVIDIA by aliquis · · Score: 1

      The funny part is how they would had got an Nvidia chipset to get better integrated graphics when ATIs integrated ones are superior to Nvidias.

      But then I'm not sure if ATI makes chipsets for laptops with Intel CPUs and integrated graphics so maybe that was impossible.

      Anyone know?

    13. Re:Hooray for NVIDIA by Johnpmcc · · Score: 1

      You are so right!!!

  2. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  3. LEAK! This year's "ONE MORE THING" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apple will announce that due to the financial crisis, they've been able to purcase Iceland. However, it will be rebranded as iCeland. Steve Jobs was apparently very fond of their homogeneous population.

    1. Re:LEAK! This year's "ONE MORE THING" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      As part of the deal they're also getting England which will of course be re branded to iNgland.

    2. Re:LEAK! This year's "ONE MORE THING" by Gewalt · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't think I've ever heard Bjork described as "homogenous" before.

      --
      Modding Trolls +1 inciteful since 1999
    3. Re:LEAK! This year's "ONE MORE THING" by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      Apple will announce that due to the financial crisis, they've been able to purcase Iceland.

      Great! perhaps that means that Gordon Brown will use anti-terror legislation to seize control of all the Apple Stores in the UK and hand out free MacBooks to disgruntled savers.

      (Apparently my money is safe, but its now in Holland - hope they don't put it all into tulip futures)

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    4. Re:LEAK! This year's "ONE MORE THING" by 808Lupine · · Score: 1

      That's good. It actually wouldn't surprise me at all.

      --
      Eagles may soar, but weasles don't get sucked into jet engines - Unknown
    5. Re:LEAK! This year's "ONE MORE THING" by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Geez, get off her back. She's 43 years old. You couldn't expect her to stay impish forever, you know.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:LEAK! This year's "ONE MORE THING" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they're being relocated to Apple's Homogeneous Bar in their San Francisco store.

    7. Re:LEAK! This year's "ONE MORE THING" by phatlipmojo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Homogenic, yes.
      Homogenous, no.

      --

      Nice things are nicer than nasty ones.
    8. Re:LEAK! This year's "ONE MORE THING" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe Jobs was just a fan of her album Homogenic.

    9. Re:LEAK! This year's "ONE MORE THING" by moosesocks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't forget Sigur Ros! I swear those guys are elves or something....

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    10. Re:LEAK! This year's "ONE MORE THING" by tholomyes · · Score: 1

      Homogenic, perhaps?

      --
      When did the future switch from being a promise to a threat? -C. Palahniuk
    11. Re:LEAK! This year's "ONE MORE THING" by oldhack · · Score: 1

      Apple will keep the genome database, and extradite the rest to UK for terrorism. I've heard things.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    12. Re:LEAK! This year's "ONE MORE THING" by DrEasy · · Score: 1

      But homogenic definitely.

      --
      "In our tactical decisions, we are operating contrary to our strategic interest."
    13. Re:LEAK! This year's "ONE MORE THING" by mrdoogee · · Score: 1

      Oh to have Mod points for you. Mod Parent up!

      --
      I threw away my mod points for THIS?

    14. Re:LEAK! This year's "ONE MORE THING" by cens0r · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I saw Sigur Ros here in Seattle and Paul Allen sat next to me. It was weird.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  4. Carved from... by BloodyIron · · Score: 0

    Perhaps you mean carved or machined from a single piece of aluminum? As opposed to bent, or molded...

  5. Or put another way by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apple will soon be selling pre-bricked laptops.

    1. Re:Or put another way by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      "Your Macbook portable computer comes from the factory pre-bricked. To unbrick your computer, or wake it from brick mode after inactivity, simply press the power button above the keyboard."

    2. Re:Or put another way by jopsen · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought too...

    3. Re:Or put another way by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apple will soon be selling pre-bricked laptops.

      Ha! Dell's been doing that for years!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    4. Re:Or put another way by Burpmaster · · Score: 1

      Apple will soon be selling pre-bricked laptops.

      Hey, it worked for iPhones!

  6. If they sell a laptop for $800... by argent · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If they sell a laptop for $800, as rumored, then who's going to buy a Mac mini for $600+?

    Of course, they could probably sell the mini for $400 and still make 40% profit. It's basically a laptop with the most expensive part of a laptop (the screen) left out.

    1. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by pete-classic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All I want for Christmas is a Mini with a Blu-ray drive. An integrated screen is a detriment to an HTPC.

      -Peter

    2. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mini for the living room, MBP for meetings, $800 laptop for starbucks, ipod for walking-dancing, iphone for amazing portable apps, MacPro for games (photoshop), i don't see overlapping.

    3. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by Shivetya · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Makes more sense to expand the iTV to support a Blu-Ray drive and offer it in black.

      Sorry, but the mini just doesn't fit for me. It looks out of place unless I hide it behind the TV

      --
      * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    4. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 3, Informative

      There have been rumours of the mini getting cancelled for years. It might finally happen. The notebook market seems to be leaving the desktop market behind anyway.

    5. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why do people still want an HTPC when things like the Popcorn Hour A-110 exist? It draws was less power than a PC and is fairly inexpensive.

    6. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by schnikies79 · · Score: 1

      Because I want a DVR, not a streaming box.

      --
      Gone!
    7. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the Popcorn Hour has about as much flexibility as an uncooked spaghetti.

    8. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by ducomputergeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'll still buy mini's. I love the things. I've got 8, mostly still 1.25 and 1.42Ghz G4's that I've picked up off ebay. I have one hooked up to my 32" LCD TV as a media center (basically an Apple TV before there were apple TV's) and then use the others as a cheap rendering grid for Final Cut and Blender. Best part is they take up a shelf on my book case and don't drive up the powerbill that much nor heat the den as bad as the quadcore. (used to heat a bloody 1 bedroom apt with the thing.)

      At work we've bought mini's to replace all the point of sale and desktop units. Worked out well since they already had monitors/touchscreens and keyboards and mice that were all USB.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    9. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by argent · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wish I had your discretionary toy budget.

    10. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Apple's laptop sales passed their desktop sales over two years ago. They cater for the 'you can't squeeze as much power as I need into a laptop' market with the Mac Pro. The Mac Mini is for the 'I can't afford a laptop' market, and this is growing steadily smaller. I wouldn't be surprised to see the AppleTV and Mac Mini product lines converge - a small box running OS X under the hood, but only exposing Safari, iPhoto and iTunes at the UI, with the ability to rip CDs, and maybe DVDs too. The only question is whether it would run x86 or ARM. The newer OMAP chips can decode H.264 in realtime, and are a lot cheaper than anything Intel has on offer.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    11. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by argent · · Score: 1

      The Mac desktop market has been left behind because Apple hasn't had a decent desktop since, oh, 1997 or so. The Mac mini is at best a quarter-hearted bone tossed to the market to avoid being completely left out.

    12. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Someone who doesn't want a built-in screen and keyboard?

    13. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by argent · · Score: 1

      The Mac Mini is for the 'I can't afford a laptop' market, and this is growing steadily smaller.

      And there's nothing for the 'I want a regular desktop' market. Which is most of the market, in the part of the market where there's actual competition. Nobody buys all-in-one PC, which is why the so-called "iMac killers" don't sell... the only reason the iMac sells as well as it does is because if you want OS X and reasonable performance for a reasonable price... well, there's no alternative.

    14. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by argent · · Score: 1

      Someone who doesn't want a built-in screen and keyboard?

      If someone like me, who doesn't want a built-in screen, and who was still upgrading his old G3 (Originally G3/233, finally G4/533 with 768MB and a Radeon 9200/128K) right up to the month before the mini came out because he didn't want an iMac, is asking "who's going to buy it for that price"... maybe that's not such a good answer any more?

    15. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by not+already+in+use · · Score: 1

      All I want for christmas is a PSP. Wanna hear my rap?

      --
      Similes are like metaphors
    16. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      That's pretty good. But still no Blu-ray . . . which you might recall was my original request.

      Looks like the codec support is pretty good, but I like having a full-blown computer hooked up to my TV. Web, email, handbrake, bittorrent, easy codec updates.

      I'm happy to pay three times as much (and burn three times the juice) for all the features I want. Actually, at the end of the day it saves power, since I'd have to run some other computing platform in addition to "Popcorn Hour".

      -Peter

    17. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by not+already+in+use · · Score: 1

      MBP for meetings, $800 laptop for starbucks

      No, no overlapping at all.

      --
      Similes are like metaphors
    18. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps not a good answer for you? A lot of people are using them as servers. I still plan to get two of them.

    19. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by pete-classic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I really like having a general purpose computer hooked up to my TV.

      You know you can't add codecs to an AppleTV without voiding the warranty, right? And it doesn't have the horsepower to decode anything good in software anyway. Blech.

      Seems way more important than the color to me. But if you're really hung up on it, buy a skin: http://www.skinit.com/devices/miscellaneous/apple_miscellaneous (You can do "custom" and select all black.)

      -Peter

    20. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1, Troll

      Apple doesn't WANT to play in the cutthroat competitive part of the market. They're quite happy taking the premium customers and leaving the "I want it as cheap as dirt no matter what" market to Dell et al. Which is smart: Apple is not a supply-chain-efficiency-trumps-all company like Dell / Walmart.

    21. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by barzok · · Score: 1

      All I want for Christmas is a Mini with a Blu-ray drive

      That may be enough for me to cancel my cable subscription.

    22. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by myz24 · · Score: 1

      I've actually said this before. I fear the mini is going away, to be replaced by the Macbook. It hasn't been upgraded in a year now. Hopefully they'll make the aTV a bit more useful, but seeing as how Apple would sooner sell me a digital copy of something than allow me to use a disc, I imagine the aTV will remain how it is.

    23. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by argent · · Score: 1

      A lot of people are using them as servers.

      I suspect that's what mine's going to end up as, eventually.

      But it cost more than my mini-ITX box, and it's not as good a server.

      And that's sure as hell not the desktop market.

    24. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Yup. That's what my Mini is used for. Makes the perfect personal server. They don't take up much space, can easily connect into your existing KVM, are inexpensive, and still provide enough horsepower for most moderate-use server purposes.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    25. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      While I agree with you, I don't think your logic will hold sway on Apple's decision RE mini vs. iTV.

      Ask not if you want a general purpose computer hooked up to your TV, Ask if Steve Jobs wants a general purpose hooked up to your TV, and all that.

    26. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by argent · · Score: 0

      The "I want something as cheap as dirt" market is heading for $200, not $400.

      $400 (and typically more like $500-$700) is a mainstream desktop price, and gets you quite a lot more desktop than the $600 (and typically more like $700-$800) mini.

      I'm not talking about Apple competing on price, I'm talking about Apple providing a high quality conventional desktop that someone who's considering an HP or Dell but wants to get away from the Windows toxic ecosystem might be interested in buying.

    27. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      Wait, except that the part with the actual competition is shrinking.

      http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/16/economy-hits-us-pc-sales-but-notebook-growth-remains-strong/

      Desktops are being outsold by laptops, at least in the US, and that trend will continue worldwide. The reason iMac killers don't sell is that until 2008, most iMac killers were suicidal; ugly, bulky, expensive, and hard to use.

      Why would Apple want to compete in a shrinking market? They just need the Mac mini to last another three years and that market will essentially be dead.

    28. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by CWRUisTakingMyMoney · · Score: 1

      A bit OT, and n00b me if you want, but how do you get the minis to work together as a grid? Do you use OS X Server, or something that works with the general OS X?

      --
      Those who anthropomorphize science and/or nature already believe in an intelligent designer.
    29. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by argent · · Score: 1

      For values of "shrinking" that translate to "not growing as strongly". Unless you think the US economy isn't ever going to recover, in which case this whole question is irrelevant because nobody will be able to afford a Mac or a PC.

    30. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      No, for values of shrinking where laptop sales are greater than desktop sales.

      In other words, Apple COULD invest in the desktop market, but chose to invest in the laptop market instead because it is growing faster. Just like Apple chose to invest in mobile phones instead of DVRs or tablets because, in proportion, those markets are also shrinking.

      If the math isn't obvious: 99 desktop and 99 laptop sales today means there is a 50/50 market. If next year we see 110 desktop sales but 150 laptop sales, yes, both markets grew but the skew is now 43% desktops and 57% laptops.

    31. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by jkerman · · Score: 1

      I dont believe it would void your warranty to install codecs on appleTV, they worked out how to modify it without taking the case off a loooong time ago. check out 'patchstick'

    32. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by c_forq · · Score: 1

      In the corporate culture I'm used to, you NEVER do personal stuff on business equipment (not because of policy or anything like that, but mostly due to not trusting IT to not read your e-mails/files, plus possible suspicion when/if discovered you have been polishing up your resume).

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    33. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by GayBliss · · Score: 1

      I just bought a Mac mini and I think I still would have if they offered a laptop for the same price. I don't like working on laptops and only do so when I am traveling. The Mac mini shares my keyboard, monitor, mouse, speakers, and USB peripherals with my Linux box using a KVM switch. It's a much better setup than a laptop would be and takes up no additional space on my desk.

    34. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by jcr · · Score: 3, Informative

      how do you get the minis to work together as a grid?

      With this

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    35. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if I kept my personal files on a separate laptop, I'd still dump a copy of my resume on the work file and call it 'b4_revisions' so they know who exactly is looking out for number 1.

      --
      refrigerator-door-pull for getting beer: lose 4 calories, 6 reps
      16-oz wrist curls: lose 8 calories, 4 to 6 reps
      Take that, sig limiter!

    36. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      The Mac Mini is for the 'I can't afford a laptop' market, and this is growing steadily smaller.

      Anybody getting a Mac Mini because they can't afford a laptop is stupid and deserves to be separated from their money. A Mini can't be used as a laptop period. Sure it's easy to move but it doesn't have a display.

      Fslcon

    37. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by falconwolf · · Score: 1

      Apple chose to invest in mobile phones instead of DVRs or tablets because, in proportion, those markets are also shrinking.

      According to eWeek the market share for tablet is growing. TFA says between 2006 and 2007 the market share doubled and is more than 7% of the mobile market. I'd love the have a Mac Tablet, though Axiotron makes the Modbook Apple itself doesn't have a tablet Mac. I've often thought it might be a good idea for Apple to buy Axiotron, but I bet anti-trust complaints would be filed.

      Falcon

    38. Re:If they sell a laptop for $800... by kchrist · · Score: 1

      It depends on what kind of display you actually want. If you want a giant, wall-covering TV you may be right, but if your needs are more modest an integrated screen works great.

  7. Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful

    God knows that gaming graphics is the only reason left why I'm still hanging on to the PC platform...

    Are first-person shooters and indie games the only reason left why you haven't already moved to the Xbox 360 or PS3 platform?

    1. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by BlowHole666 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well not too many MMOs are played on an Xbox 360 or PS3. Probably the only semi-big name game that is on a console is the Final Fantasy one. Age of Conan "Claims" they will make a game for the Xbox 360. So if you are an MMO fan and you play games like DAoC, WOW, Warhammer, EVE you are stuck with a PC/mac rather then a console.

      --
      I smoked pot once. But I DID NOT inhale. Will you hire me?
    2. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by Synn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I own a PS3 and I still prefer PCs for shooters and gaming. I just like the interface better.

      Though maybe that would change if I just forced myself to play them on consoles more.

    3. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I dunno. If you are going to play "shooters", then why
      not use a platform where you can actually hold a gun,
      point it at things and shoot?

      ???

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by butterflysrage · · Score: 2, Funny

      same reason I don't go to a gun range... I'm a crappy shot.

      --
      the preceding post was not spell checked... suck it.
    5. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by jedidiah · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Oh that's a hoot...

      "I play shooters, cause I can't hope to do the real thing."

      It's a GAME.

      You don't have to worry about the trigger pull, the weight of the
      gun, the length of the gun or keeping the gun steady during recoil.

      That wii controller is not going to have any of the drawbacks of an AK-47, or an M-16 or even a 9mm Luger.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    6. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      My wife "owns" the tv, I "own" the computers. We all have our own computer, there are one or two TVs in the house. Consoles are good party gaming machines. PCs are serious gaming machines, or the one that you can use without bugging someone else to "stop and let me play".

      So, no, that's not the reason I haven't even considered purchasing a console. Though, the wife broke me down and I allowed her to get a Nintendo Wii... which is now collecting dust :^/

    7. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by hendrix2k · · Score: 5, Funny

      One need only follow this simple chart.

    8. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by tepples · · Score: 1

      Consoles are good party gaming machines. PCs are serious gaming machines

      Then which are good indie party gaming machines? Or ought "indie party gaming" not exist?

    9. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because you lose the ability to control your movements accurately, and you end up with a rail shooter. Aiming and shooting is all well and good, but putting the movement controls on the same gun would is a pain in the ass. The only solution would be something like the Wii nunchuk combined with a one-handed gun adapter. Which would actually be kinda cool, but it hasn't been pulled off quite right yet, and either way it limits you to Wii graphics, which are nowhere near what PS3/360/PC capabilities are right now. The Wii is a lot of fun, but no one is claiming it's next-gen graphics ;)

    10. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by lazy_playboy · · Score: 1

      He said he's a crappy shot, presumably implying that he doesn't like having to point the controller at the screen. Nowhere did he mention any of the gun-nut stuff you're banging on about. It's a simple case of prefering mouse/keyboard over console controller.

    11. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by FrozenFOXX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since you mentioned you have a PS3, why not just use a mouse and keyboard with it, the interface you prefer? Several games already support this such as UT3.

      As a side note on the topic of control interfaces (though not to the parent specifically), I personally "prefer" the gamepad. It's comfy and in some titles like RTSes (!) I actually do VERY well with it (shockingly, I might add). However, both the 360 AND the PS3 support keyboards and mice, it's the games that don't. The onus is on a game company to support keyboards and mice in their games. It's not really very fair to a console these days to complain that a console doesn't give you an interface when in all reality yes, it does, it's just your favorite game studio decided to gimp the product for the platform. Bitch at the dev house.

      --
      "Just a fox, a whisper."
    12. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by danaris · · Score: 1

      Consoles are good party gaming machines. PCs are serious gaming machines

      Then which are good indie party gaming machines? Or ought "indie party gaming" not exist?

      There's a big difference between what ought to be and what is.

      Most people aren't going to have a computer set up in such a way that it's a good fit for party gaming. In general, the screen is small and the location is set up for 1 person to sit at it comfortably.

      I would say that console gaming ought to be opened up much more to independent developers (as WiiWare is starting to, and, I think, XBLA, though I know much less about it), but with things as they (largely still) are, "indie party gaming" isn't a big genre.

      Dan Aris

      --
      Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
    13. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

      I absolutely love graphics and sounds on Xbox360, especially on FPSes, but for the life of me I can't unlearn mouse and keyboard to get used to a standard controller. And don't get me started on RTS control schemes...

    14. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by Kleen13 · · Score: 1

      I agree... although perhaps the fact that I bought a Wii (I have kids) and am particularily unimpressed with the graphics quality has something to do with it. It's now becoming a problem. I can't keep up with the hardware requirements for my pc & and can't get a different console. SWMBO - (She Who Must Be Obeyed)wont let me. Perhaps the time is coming for me to buy her a Mac...

      --
      That sinking feeling deep in your gut when you KNOW you screwed up bad summed up with: {head desk} {head desk}
    15. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by Kleen13 · · Score: 1

      I find most "Old School" gamers still prefer keyboard and mouse. I guess its a Duke Nukem 3D thing.

      --
      That sinking feeling deep in your gut when you KNOW you screwed up bad summed up with: {head desk} {head desk}
    16. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by tepples · · Score: 1

      Game controllers are terrible for anything more complicated than tetris or the original super mario bros.

      When did platformers surpass the capabilities of a gamepad? Super Mario Bros. 3? Super Mario World? Super Mario 64? Super Mario Galaxy? And sometimes when you have friends visiting your home, you want something uncomplicated. Besides, keyboard and mouse mean you have to buy more machines and more copies of the game in order to fit more than one player.

      Also, consoles are for children.

      More than likely, there are children in your family.

    17. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Semantics. Almost every single game for the PC (and I dare say every shooter) in the past 8 years has used the mouse/keyboard for controls. And relatively few console games (even shooters) support that scheme. The poster wasn't bitching about the consoles not supporting mouse/keyboard; the stated preference is perfectly inline with the PC/Games vs. Console/Games control mechanisms.

      Hell, the SNES had a mouse.

    18. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by WaroDaBeast · · Score: 1

      I don't think playing Baldur's Gate would feel right with a gamepad. Or Fallout. Or Jagged Alliance. Oh, and Age of Empires III too.... Shall I go on?

      Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against consoles, but some games are best played with a keyboard/mouse combo.

      --
      "The body may heal, but the mind is not always so resilient." -- Deus Ex: Human Revolution
    19. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Red Steel for the Wii pulled the control scheme off wonderfully. The graphics and level design could use a thorough beating from a pretty stick, but the gameplay is a riot if you have a few friends over.

    20. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no.. just the desire not to support locked down hardware, that offers a largely inferior experience.

    21. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Well for one reason, I like to get customized models for my games. You can't really do that on a console.

      Moreover, most of the games I play are mods on the Source engine. Fortress Forever, Eternal Silence, Zombie Panic, etc. They're free, I can make maps for them, and I can download other players' maps and customizations.

      So far the only console game that has even made an attempt at this is Unreal Tournament 3, but I'm no fan of UT and I don't own the PS3.

    22. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by Digero · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, Turbine (LotRO, DDO, AC) has announced that they're developing a console MMO. It might be a port of LotRO, or an entirely new game.

    23. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      I don't invite anyone over for my parties. I just get a beer out of the fridge. That way, I don't have to share my computer, tv, or beer.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    24. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      If by serious you mean "never-ending money pit," then yes, gaming PC's are serious.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    25. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to be like that. Hell froze over and I actually managed to get a grip on the PS3 controller. So much so, I don't bother with PC gaming now. Much prefer playing on a 50" Pio and surround sound, slobbed out on the sofa.

    26. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      I'll have to check it out. Thanks!

    27. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by timbck2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't have to worry about the trigger pull, the weight of the
      gun, the length of the gun or keeping the gun steady during recoil.

      Not to mention the danger of injury or loss of life...

      --
      Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
    28. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by stewbacca · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I play Warhammer on my iMac too...just booted in XP mode.

    29. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, yeah, and your mac doesn't use a motherboard, it uses a logicboard. It's all very different. Nothing at all like a PC. Remember people, if it runs Windows, Linux, Unix, BSD, OS2, or AmigaOS it's a PC. But that OSX machine running the same hardware is a MAC.

    30. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by Molochi · · Score: 1

      Because most FPS games aren't set up to run like House of the Dead or Duck Hunt.

      FPS and RTS are games developed for (and around) the KB/Mouse interface. The keyboard gives you easy access to a 100+ button controller for one hand and the mouse allows for both precision and speed.

      If you give me a gun controller for a FPS I'm going to also need a Wii Fit board to stand on. Gun + Snowboard = Crazy Awesome.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    31. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough Civilization Revolution on the PS3 and 360 works very well with a console controller instead of a mouse. Admittedly it is a simpler version of computer Civ and is not real time strategy.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    32. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by mrdoogee · · Score: 1

      PS3 has wireless mouse and keyboard drivers, but for some reason Nobody is making games that utilize them. Playing Oblivion with a sixaxis is no way to go through life, son.



      --
      I threw away my mod points for THIS?

    33. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Hmm, let's see, while the PS3 allows for mouse and keyboard, devs don't develop for that capability.

      Oh, both online services SUCK. There's another reason (I own both PS3 and X360.) Having to pay for what PC users have done for free is bullshit.

      Hmm, what else can I bring out as a console online user? Moronic children talking trash incessantly, so much that game sounds are drowned out. What else? Oh, unreliable server downtimes thanks to XBOX Live. The fact we have to route through another server before we connect

      Seriously, look at the console market for a second - they RELY UPON YOU BEING A SLAVE TO THEM.

      PCs don't have this problem, for the most part (WoW, EQ, I'm looking at you for exceptions.)

      What's the point? I can play for FREE on a PC most of the games available on consoles, at least online, without needing to pay a monthly fee after PAYING FOR THE DAMNED GAME TO BEGIN WITH.

      Wake up.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    34. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by Khyber · · Score: 1

      You quote something and then state the same thing in an attempt to refute the point which was already made.

      This is why Anonymous cowards should not be allowed. Either sign up for a name and take the downmodding or GTFA.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    35. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Umm, let's see. How am I supposed to hit WASD and dodge when I'm busy with both hands on a fucking pistol or rifle?

      You expect me to stand still on that platform and shoot while being shot at? Sorry, SEGA's octagon pad ain't gonna do much help for you up on that platform. /sarcasm off

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    36. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by somersault · · Score: 1

      Could that perhaps be why he said "PC/mac" instead of just "PC" in the sentence you quoted?

      No wait, maybe he just got confused and started talking about McDonalds, that's got to be it.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    37. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by somersault · · Score: 1

      I got a PS3 this year and got used to aiming with the joysticks a little. I still much prefer the accuracy of a mouse, but I don't mind being limited by the sticks as long as I know my opponents have the same limitation.

      The main problem is that you can basically 'stop on a dime' with your aiming with a mouse. Just compare how natural and accurate you can be when using a laptop with a mouse or even a trackpad, compared to one of those little nub joysticks you get in the keyboard sometimes. The nub is great for being lazy and not moving your hand around much, but for games where you are playing against others online, you want to have the best accuracy you can get.

      Similarly, I would prefer to fly a plane with a joystick than a mouse (though again I can do okay with the mouse if required).

      --
      which is totally what she said
    38. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      What about when I pick up the chainsaw? Do I actually switch? I haven't found too many of those at the gamestores. I'd like to be Ash...Housewares, even for a short while :-)

      Shop smart! Shop S-Mart!

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    39. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that OSX machine running the same hardware is a MAC.

      Running OSX on something turns it into part of a network card? ... sweet!

    40. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by Dr+Dodgy · · Score: 1

      Wow, even though you managed to quote this person, you didn't actually manage to read their fucking post. What a fucking dolt!

    41. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One word: "PORTABILITY!"

      Everytime I hear another moron answer the lack of gaming graphics on MacBooks (or on the Mac OS period) with "get an XBox/PS3/Wii I want to strangle you! Not all gamers want to be tethered to their living room!

      And if you want to play MMORPGs, such as WOW or Everquest, you CAN'T play them on the kiddie consoles.

      Dumbasses........

    42. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by tepples · · Score: 1

      I can play for FREE on a PC most of the games available on consoles [...] after PAYING FOR THE DAMNED GAME TO BEGIN WITH

      That's a big "most". Is there anything like Smash Bros. for a Windows PC or a Mac?

    43. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by tepples · · Score: 1

      One word: "PORTABILITY!"

      For which a DS or PSP kicks a MacBook's behind, despite the 1995 or 1999 graphics.

      And if you want to play MMORPGs, such as WOW or Everquest, you CAN'T play them on the kiddie consoles.

      Sure, WOW happens to be a Windows/Mac exclusive, but Final Fantasy XI and EverQuest Online Adventures both run on the original PS2.

    44. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

      Drakkenmensch,

      Thanks for expressing this ACCURATELY. The problem is that you can't 'unlearn' PC controls- NOT that the console controller is bad.

      I was a hard-core PC gamer for many years. When the Xbox came out, I played Halo at a friends house. I thought he was a chump because the control was horrible for an FPS.

      A few months later I bought my own Xbox. It took a while to figure out the controls, but once I did, there was no looking back.

      I *hate* playing an FPS on keyboard/mouse. It's disorienting, and I can't move the way I want to.

      Neither control scheme is bad. It's just a matter of what you are used to.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    45. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

      And the only reason for that 100+ button controller is so that you can point the gun up, down, left, right, move, and variations thereof.

    46. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by Mista2 · · Score: 1

      I prefer console gaming as you can get a PS3 or XBox 360 for under the price of a top line video card, and there is much less chance of it crashing out, and if you fork out $100 for a game, it will probably work.

    47. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by Khyber · · Score: 1

      MUGEN. I have over 800+ characters and more being added Daily.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    48. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      Only if you play non-free MMOs. I've always thought the consoles were more expensive. Games are generally $40+, and the console is just a console. Not a web browser, not a document writer, not a optical disk burner, not a graphics design machine, not a financial manager, not a ... you name it. It is just a game machine. Without a decent way to mod the games if you so choose.

    49. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by Jonny_eh · · Score: 1

      WoW is available in a native universal binary for the Mac. In other words, if you have a Mac, you can play World of Warcraft.

    50. Re:Mac vs. PC vs. Xbox 360 vs. PS3 by BlowHole666 · · Score: 1
      You must have missed this:

      So if you are an MMO fan and you play games like DAoC, WOW, Warhammer, EVE you are stuck with a PC/mac rather then a console.

      See I included WOW and the Mac because I know that WOW can be played on a Mac. So what was the point of your comment again?

      --
      I smoked pot once. But I DID NOT inhale. Will you hire me?
  8. FYI by ArcherB · · Score: 5, Informative

    OpenCL is NOT a typo.

    See HERE:

    OpenCL (Open Computing Language) is a language for programming heterogeneous data and task parallel computing across GPUs and CPUs. It was created by Apple in cooperation with others, and is based on C99.

    The purpose is to recall OpenGL and OpenAL, which are open industry standards for 3D graphics and computer audio respectively, to extend the power of the GPU beyond graphics (GPGPU).

    Apple has proposed OpenCL for Khronos Group where on June 16th 2008 Compute Working Group was formed for the standardization work.

    OpenCL is scheduled to be introduced in Mac OS 10.6 ('Snow Leopard').According to the press release:

    Snow Leopard further extends support for modern hardware with Open Computing Language (OpenCL), which lets any application tap into the vast gigaflops of GPU computing power previously available only to graphics applications. OpenCL is based on the C programming language and has been proposed as an open standard.

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:FYI by ArhcAngel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thank you. I did a double take myself until I goggled it. It's frustrating when posters assume new technology is automatically known by everyone. Don't they know the tinfoil impedes our clairvoyance abilities?

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    2. Re:FYI by Gat0r30y · · Score: 1

      Anecdotal Evidence (my one iMac) indicates that it is awesome by the way.

      --
      Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
    3. Re:FYI by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      OpenCL is NOT a typo.

      See HERE

      Please update the fine summary to include the above informative link.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    4. Re:FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did a double take myself until I goggled it

      The goggle! It does nothing!

    5. Re:FYI by Winckle · · Score: 1

      You must be new here! :)

    6. Re:FYI by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      You must be new here! :)

      Not as new as you. ;)

      And, surprise surprise, the summary was in fact updated!

      (I only checked after seeing another article reference OpenCL with a link to the Wikipedia page.)

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  9. OpenCL? by Anita+Coney · · Score: 0

    Open Cute Library? Open Cuddly Library? Open Cutting-our-prices-below-retail Library?

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:OpenCL? by aredubya74 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can browse /., but not Wikipedia? "OpenCL (Open Computing Language) is a language for programming heterogeneous data and task parallel computing across GPUs and CPUs. It was created by Apple in cooperation with others, and is based on C99."

      --

      RW

    2. Re:OpenCL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      They're taking a page out of Microsoft's book. Open Chair Launching

    3. Re:OpenCL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since a graphics chip manufacturer was mentioned, I assumed "open GL" was intended instead of "open CL"

    4. Re:OpenCL? by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Thanks, that was highly informative. Like an idiot, because it involved graphics, I ignorantly assumed it involved OpenGL.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  10. Nvidia & Apple aren't really know for reliabil by MSG · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Nvidia? That'd be just awesome. I can't think of any other way to make Apple hardware (already more prone to need warranty service than any other manufacturer's product that I can name) any less reliable. Go go gadget failure!

  11. Re:I'll buy apple... by MacColossus · · Score: 4, Funny

    SNOW Leopard comes out next year. Start saving your pennies. :-) http://www.apple.com/macosx/snowleopard/

  12. No time to answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    too busy doing wget on apple.com and going though the dl with a fine-toothed comb looking for clues

    --Apple fanboy

    1. Re:No time to answer by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      too busy doing wget on apple.com and going though the dl with a fine-toothed comb looking for clues

      Historically, store.apple.com has tended to be more prone to product information leakage than the rest. You may want to focus your search there.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  13. $600 to $1500+ mini tower by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 0, Redundant

    People want a desktop mac mini / mid tower with DESKTOP PARTS.

    1. Re:$600 to $1500+ mini tower by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most people are ill equipped to fill up a 40G drive, nevermind 1TB.

      Those of us that can easily fill up a 1TB drive, find ourselves
      wanting a lot more. So the mini isn't as bad as one might think
      at first glance. There are far better things that Apple could do
      with the line besides replicate the System76 Sable.

      A Quad core mini would be my personal first choice. Add a video
      chipset that has onboard h264 acceleration (although with the
      quad you might not need it).

      An appletv that can go toe to toe with the popcorn hour when
      it comes to h264 decoding would also be a good move.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:$600 to $1500+ mini tower by argent · · Score: 1

      If you could stick a decent video card and a 5.25" hard drive in the mini, it might be worth $600. With Intel Integrated Graphics Disaster and a laptop drive, it's not. With a 16x PCI-E slot and a larger hard drive it'd be a bit less "mini", but not by much, and it'd paper over the gap in the product line nicely.

    3. Re:$600 to $1500+ mini tower by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Go tell it to everyone else.

      In the "it fits inside the footprint of a VCR or DVD player" category, it's VERY price competitive.

      It also does well against the larger Vista machines selling at places like Costco and BestBuy and will be more than adequate for that sort of user.

      If you are "more demanding", a Sable really isn't going to cut it either.

      If you are "more demanding", ultimately the only thing that will suffice is building your own box from scratch.

      Any brand name Windows PC that fits your requirements is a very good lesson in that regard.

      An Apple is cheaper. How soon until the world ends?

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:$600 to $1500+ mini tower by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Who the hell uses 5.25" hard drives these days? If you use a Quantum Bigfoot, you deserve every kind of data loss and corruption you get.

    5. Re:$600 to $1500+ mini tower by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Those of us that can easily fill up a 1TB drive, find ourselves
      wanting a lot more.

      A Quad core mini would be my personal first choice.

      I see your Mac Mini, keyboard, and display sitting on a large desk supported by four or five heavy duty server cases holding a dozen hard drives each.

      (I've thought the same, and I have those server cases.)

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    6. Re:$600 to $1500+ mini tower by tm2b · · Score: 1

      I sort-of do this. I have a mini that serves iTunes, from a library mounted from a few ReadyNAS RAIDs with 1TB drives. The NAS aspect gives a nice level of flexibility for using the storage throughout the network when needed.

      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    7. Re:$600 to $1500+ mini tower by argent · · Score: 1

      Who the hell uses 5.25" hard drives these days?

      Ah, sorry, I meant 3.5". Flashback to 1985. Sorry.

    8. Re:$600 to $1500+ mini tower by argent · · Score: 1

      In the "it fits inside the footprint of a VCR or DVD player" category, it's VERY price competitive.

      Yeh, there's lots of marginal markets you can make the mini look like a good deal for, but Joe Sixpack is gonna see the "I'm a Mac" ad, decide he's not a PC after all... then walk into Best Buy, and see a Mac mini for $600 across the aisle from an HP Pavilion that blows its doors off for $450.

    9. Re:$600 to $1500+ mini tower by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      , and see a Mac mini for $600 across the aisle from an HP Pavilion that blows its doors off for $450.

      Yeah, they have powerful fans, don't they.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    10. Re:$600 to $1500+ mini tower by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Actually, the size of a mini is bound to overwhelm the easily misled consumer.

      They will see the small and pretty, and compare it to the oversized and ugly
      and that $150 difference might not be such a big deal anymore. It's quite a
      striking contrast and it's interesting to see a n00bs reaction the first time.

      It's shock and awe.

      A $450 WinDOS PC running Vista doesn't "blow the doors" off of anything.

      Just who do you think you're trying to kid?

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    11. Re:$600 to $1500+ mini tower by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Except you can get small Windows PCs. They're not so common, because most people aren't interested in them, but I've seen more of them about in stores than Macs.

      Or just get a far smaller laptop, if you're happy with laptop components. The Mac "Mini" just seems the worst of both worlds - laptop parts, but without the portability.

      Just who do you think you're trying to kid?

      Who are you trying to kid? I fail to see how a "Mini" can impress a "n00b", given how commonplace laptops are these days (many of them far more powerful than a so-called "Mini").

    12. Re:$600 to $1500+ mini tower by argent · · Score: 1

      A $450 WinDOS PC running Vista doesn't "blow the doors" off of anything.

      Faster CPU, bigger faster hard disk, more RAM, better video, expansion slots, usually two optical drives so they can "backup" videos easier. And it plays games.

      And I've seen plenty of people's first reactions to the mini, at my house and when I've talked to them at the store. They go "that's cool" but they don't buy it, because there's just too much uncertainty in a computer they can't upgrade.

      Even if they never do, they always plan to.

  14. Shot in the arm by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

    Will NVIDIA's ailing chipset business get a shot in the arm next week?

    I got my tetanus booster shot yesterday, with my usual side-effects (kind of like having the flu.) I can tell you, a "shot in the arm" for NVIDIA doesn't sound too good right now. :-)

  15. Re:Nvidia & Apple aren't really know for relia by Microlith · · Score: 2, Informative

    already more prone to need warranty service than any other manufacturer's product that I can name

    No more prone to warranty service than every Dell I've ever had the displeasure of being asked to look at.

    But people like to look closely at Apple for failure so they can bash them. More so than even Microsoft it seems.

  16. "Brick"? ORLY? by JackassJedi · · Score: 1

    The "Brick" is probably just a FUD campaign to scare off customers trying to unlock their phones >_>

    --
    Power corrupts the few, while weakness corrupts the many.
  17. Re:Other rumours... by MacColossus · · Score: 1

    They were forced to install those as some employees were threatening to move to Redmond where they have been providing such benefits for years. Unfortunately, when making this demand they didn't realize they would be required to be on the rotation schedule to "man" said glory holes.

  18. A perfect prediction by ppolitop · · Score: 2, Funny

    Apple will either release a cheap macbook ($799) with discrete nvidia graphics, aluminum casing made with water-jets and lasers, netbook-sized, featuring an LED backlit screen -with good panel- OR thousands of people on the internet will start writing about how disappointed they are.

    1. Re:A perfect prediction by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

      You forgot the much anticipated anti-gravity feature.

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    2. Re:A perfect prediction by Altus · · Score: 1

      incorrect logical operator.

      Apple will release such a notebook AND thousands of people on the internet will start writing about how disappointed they are.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    3. Re:A perfect prediction by cjhuitt · · Score: 1

      Just type "import antigravity"

  19. Shot in the arm? by ArhcAngel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    " Will NVIDIA's ailing chipset business get a shot in the arm next week?"

    They'll need it since they just got a swift kick in the a@@

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    1. Re:Shot in the arm? by steelfood · · Score: 1

      What the hell does the American Automobile Association have to do with this?

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    2. Re:Shot in the arm? by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      Interesting.

      My MBP failed with a video issue just after it was out of warranty (stupid me, forgot the extended warranty on this one). After many conversations, Apple agreed to fix it free of charge and it's been fine ever since.

      I'll remember this if this machine dies like that again. Thanks for the link.

  20. Plausibility? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While they do make for fun fanboy wank material, does anybody actually take the OMG PWERBOOKS WILL be carved by LASER ROBOTS!!! thing seriously? Material fabrication and shaping is an area that is steadily improving; but nothing points to Apple as having made any revolutionary advances in the area recently. And, barring such revolutionary advances, machining big chunks of material isn't exactly cheap. Cheaper than it used to be, sure, and definitely cheap enough to be cost effective for some applications; but hardly cost competitive with present techniques.

    The other rumors seem markedly more plausible. 800 would be about the expected pricepoint for Apple's answer to the netbook(whether it will actually use atom and SSD or just be a low end macbook, I have no idea).

    1. Re:Plausibility? by mangu · · Score: 1

      Material fabrication and shaping is an area that is steadily improving; but nothing points to Apple as having made any revolutionary advances in the area recently. And, barring such revolutionary advances, machining big chunks of material isn't exactly cheap.

      Most probably, if the rumor is true, is that some die-cast part will have a small detail cut by a CO2 laser. That's standard industry practice and not so expensive, at least not for a notebook computer.

    2. Re:Plausibility? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, this is ridiculous. The laser will not be in a robot, but mounted to the top of a shark.

    3. Re:Plausibility? by bendodge · · Score: 1

      Also, for those people who've never touched a lathe, solid blocks of metal are expensive. Especially if you want high-grade metal, and you would for a laptop.

      --
      The government can't save you.
    4. Re:Plausibility? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Also, for those people who've never touched a lathe, solid blocks of metal are expensive. Especially if you want high-grade metal, and you would for a laptop.

      I hope to hell you meant a mill. Just thinking about making a generally rectangular object on a lathe makes my head asplode.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:Plausibility? by tyrione · · Score: 1

      Also, for those people who've never touched a lathe, solid blocks of metal are expensive. Especially if you want high-grade metal, and you would for a laptop.

      I hope to hell you meant a mill. Just thinking about making a generally rectangular object on a lathe makes my head asplode.

      Funny sh**. Can someone please stop this damn thing from rotating? I can't keep the corner orthogonal to one another.

  21. Re:I'll buy apple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If you really want an OS that randomly freezes over on you, you should've stuck with Windows ME.

  22. iPhone update? by pablo_max · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Perhaps it's a new iPhone update designed to turn all unlocked phones into "bricks".

  23. Re:Moo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only Moo??? No Moo Moo or Moooooo?
    You lazy cow!!!

  24. Re:I'll buy apple... by spazdor · · Score: 1

    Leopard... Hell...

    Tomayto tomahto.

    --
    DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
  25. Re:Moo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Moo-moo, mooooooooooo!

  26. Raising the bar for stock gfx is a positive move by eniacfoa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The best thing the computer gaming industry can do is not actually "give" people a reason to buy a console...they've already got their computer. Theres no doubt there are problems in the computer gaming world, but this move can only be a good thing for computer gamers. If PC's, laptop or desktop (and I mean "personal computers" in general) come standard with decent graphics solutions it will only increase the platforms attractiveness to average joe who cant install a graphics card himself or does not know they even exist. Many people I know were not even aware you can get control pads for computers. They like they fact that with a console you plug it in, turn it on and play. They know they will never be able to tinker around with the inside of a computer. And when I tell them about things like Spore DRM, they know they dont want to "rent" a game. IMHO, The big PC builders, Dell, HP etc..should give away a control pad with the purchase of a new PC and perhaps companies like EA could also give away some controllers with games that really need it. It doesn't have to be a fancy wifi one...just a cheap usb PS2 clone controller...if average joe knows the controllers exists, he knows he can upgrade...

  27. Wait for ture2way before getting a apple drv as... by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Wait for ture2way before getting a apple drv as the cable co have mess cable card v1 up real bad.

  28. To paraphrase Jon Stewart by spazdor · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you're defending Apple's hardware reliability by comparing it to Dell's...

    "We're in bad shape, fellas."

    --
    DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
  29. Re:Nvidia & Apple aren't really know for relia by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

    Do you have any stats to back up your claim that Apple is more prone to failure than any other manufacturer?

  30. Ick... BLOB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    For some of us who dual boot linux on Apple hardware, switching to NVidia isn't a positive development!

    1. Re:Ick... BLOB by not+already+in+use · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, it will totally suck to have your graphics hardware properly supported under Linux. Considering you're dual booting Linux along side one of the most locked-down proprietary consumer platforms available while at the same time complaining about a binary driver on the Linux side is.... Ironic.

      --
      Similes are like metaphors
    2. Re:Ick... BLOB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to Linus.

    3. Re:Ick... BLOB by GaryPatterson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ... one of the most locked-down proprietary consumer platforms available ...

      I love how people throw this sort of thing out when they must know it's just not true.

      http://developer.apple.com/opensource/index.html
      http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/
      http://developer.apple.com/opensource/internet/webkit.html

      Apple use and contribute to open source, and OS X is largely an open source OS with a proprietary front-end.

      Criticise Apple for real stuff, you've got plenty of choice. Don't make stuff up and pretend it's true though.

    4. Re:Ick... BLOB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The "most locked-down proprietary consumer platform" would be Windows right? I know I've browsed the kernel source for my Mac online at least once or twice...

    5. Re:Ick... BLOB by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Link to the OS X source download, please?

      Microsoft have contributed to open source, and they include some open source stuff in Windows, but it would be ridiculous to claim that Windows is "largely an open source OS".

    6. Re:Ick... BLOB by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      The kernel of OS X is Darwin. Have a look at the second link in my post above. The entire kernel is open sourced under the BSD licence.

      Surely you knew that?

    7. Re:Ick... BLOB by tyrione · · Score: 1

      Link to the OS X source download, please?

      Microsoft have contributed to open source, and they include some open source stuff in Windows, but it would be ridiculous to claim that Windows is "largely an open source OS".

      You can't download Darwin? Are your digits broken?

    8. Re:Ick... BLOB by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      OS X is just a kernel now, is it? Of course I know the kernel is open source, but OS X isn't "largely an open source OS">

    9. Re:Ick... BLOB by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Are your eyes broken? The OP stated "OS X", not Darwin, which is the kernel that it uses. OS X is not at all open source.

    10. Re:Ick... BLOB by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      Have a look at the layered diagram for OS X (noting that it's not to 'scale'), and you'll see some open source components:
      Darwin
      OpenGL (also the basis for Core Image)
      OpenAL (not in diagram, but in 10.4 onwards)
      SQLite (not in diagram, basis for Core Data)

      What does that leave us? Quartz, Quicktime and Aqua are the main things. The core of the OS, the important stuff is all open sourced. User interaction through Aqua is critical to the OS' usability, but since you can do everything through the command line, the non-open source elements are less critical.

      Hell, you could theoretically replace Quartz, Quicktime and Aqua with open source components. You can't replace Darwin or OpenGL.

      I believe that I am correct is saying "OS X is largely an open source OS." I did not (and would not) say it is completely open source, but the majority of the OS is.

    11. Re:Ick... BLOB by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      OP also did NOT state "all of OS X" is open source. OP said "largely" open source.

    12. Re:Ick... BLOB by Budenny · · Score: 1

      Then I must be able to get the source, modify it like with any other open source software, make derivative products, and install it on the hardware of my choice, and sell the result to whoever I want. Right?

  31. Re:Raising the bar for stock gfx is a positive mov by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

    They like they fact that with a console you plug it in, turn it on and play.

    It will be a while before the PC gaming industry can offer that.

  32. machines by zogger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A 500 buck cheap laptop today IS a cheap "all in one" from just a couple of years ago or so, which means it is perfectly fine except for most uses except extreme high end new games (mostly). You can still run a full size monitor and keyboard and a real mouse from them. Bonus extra screen and built in UPS that lasts for hours, not minutes!

  33. Since when does Microsoft make laptops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    No more prone to warranty service than every Dell I've ever had the displeasure of being asked to look at. But people like to look closely at Apple for failure so they can bash them. More so than even Microsoft it seems.

    Since when does Microsoft make laptops?

  34. Re:I'll buy apple... by jazuki · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll buy apple... ...when leopard freezes over!

    SNOW Leopard comes out next year. Start saving your pennies. :-)
    http://www.apple.com/macosx/snowleopard/

    Are you trying to explain the joke? Or announcing you didn't get it? ;)

  35. what site is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A story with lasers and no-one makes the requisite joke about sea bass? Did I stumble upon some other tech news site by mistake?

  36. toasted nicely toasted.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if they are going to work on the heat issues mac book pro's have. Mine gets hella hot

  37. Re:Nvidia & Apple aren't really know for relia by not+already+in+use · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Oh puh-leeze, if there is any company that has been given a free pass on quality issues, it's Apple. Apple's hardware is no better than any other manufacturer and the OS is crap, but they made it pretty which is all that matters in the shallow minds of their consumers.

    --
    Similes are like metaphors
  38. Still won't save nVidia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love nVidia, but having a lock on Apple still won't save them. Unless they can make a shockingly large profit margin, of course. But given how aggressively spiteful Apple is of anyone making money on stuff bearing an Apple logo, that's highly unlikely.

    Somehow, I can't see how moving from a huge amount of the computer market to most of a 4% share of it will help. Sure, it might keep them afloat, but it's a huge step down.

    IMO, AMD was stupid for purchasing ATI... they should have purchased nVidia. Trying to improve ATI is like polishing a turd.

    1. Re:Still won't save nVidia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Somehow, I can't see how moving from a huge amount of the computer market to most of a 4% share of it will help. Sure, it might keep them afloat, but it's a huge step down.

      Nothing is stopping Nvidia from making PC chipsets. The Apple deal would be on top of what they're doing now.

      IMO, AMD was stupid for purchasing ATI... they should have purchased nVidia. Trying to improve ATI is like polishing a turd.

      Maybe buying ATI was a mistake but it seems like its paying off. ATI currently leads on performance and performance per watt at all levels of the GPU market.
      On top of that, Nvidiia seems to be having serious problems with their notebook & desktop GPUs, much more than just the few HP model that they're claiming.

    2. Re:Still won't save nVidia by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 1

      ATI is definitely leading per-watt, but are you sure on performance? I was under the impression that the balls-out pricey nVidia cards were still holding some edge.

      The GPU problems nVidia's having are ugly, though, and they're keeping me from buying anything but ATI for the foreseeable future.

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
    3. Re:Still won't save nVidia by Jorophose · · Score: 1

      ATI is definitely leading per-watt, but are you sure on performance?

      Yes. The HD4870X2 beats the GTX260 and challenges the GTX280 from what I've seen. The HD4870 for its price is simply unbeatable, same for the HD4850, it just has GDDR3 RAM and a one-slot cooler, lower clocks too maybe. The HD4670 is the HD3870 in a smaller package. And it's supposed to sell for less than 120$. The HD4550 and HD4350, although not necessarily powerful, are likely as good as the HD3650, and one is passively cooled, the other is half-height.

      So yes, ATI has the market cornered.

    4. Re:Still won't save nVidia by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 1

      Alright, that's what I thought. I was under the impression that the GTX280 was faster, though not by a lot. Other than that, no disagreement here. :)

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
    5. Re:Still won't save nVidia by Jorophose · · Score: 1

      Well, it seems the GTX280 is faster; but the margin at that point seems to be so small, for a card so pricey (isn't it still 500$-600$? I thought I saw a X2 for 300$-400$...).

    6. Re:Still won't save nVidia by Jorophose · · Score: 1

      Hate to reply twice for nothing, but disregard my other reply; all I can find is fanboy material. I'd have to say though it's a non-starter and that the HD4870X2 is clearly the way to go.

  39. Re:I'll buy apple... by MacColossus · · Score: 1

    Neither. Just holding people to their word.

  40. Stamping, drawing, etc. by Animats · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Right. Nobody makes mass-produced items by machining them out of solid metal. It's too slow, and you waste too much metal. That's what die-casting, drawing, and stamping are for. Laptop cases are thin enough that die-casting is probably overkill. Drawing or stamping is more likely, followed by a punching step. There might be a role for a laser if very small holes have to be made or some surface engraving is desired.

    The NextCube case was a magnesium casting, which was sort of silly for a desktop device.

    A cute idea for the case modding crowd would be industrial origami. This little-known technology works much better than you'd expect. It's a fun experience to take a flat, prepunched plate and hand-fold it into an electrical outlet box.

    1. Re:Stamping, drawing, etc. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      That is pretty sweet. The basic "well, we fold boxes out of cardboard, why not metal" intuition is easy; but the technique they use to make foldable edges is quite clever.

      Your comment suggests that you've seen this stuff in the flesh. Do you work with/for them, or have things made this way become generally available?

    2. Re:Stamping, drawing, etc. by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      THe very small holes angle may be it, the speaker grills look to have been expanded in the leaked photos

    3. Re:Stamping, drawing, etc. by Animats · · Score: 1

      Your comment suggests that you've seen this stuff in the flesh. Do you work with/for them...

      No. I was at one of the meetings in Silicon Valley where companies go for VC funding, and had a chance to fold some of the plates by hand. They really do bend and snap together like they're supposed to.

      What they're really selling is a CAD system that designs parts and stamping dies so this works.

    4. Re:Stamping, drawing, etc. by Animats · · Score: 1

      The very small holes angle may be it.

      That makes sense. Those grids of small ventilating/audio holes may well be laser-punched. The image shown has holes with a diameter of maybe 0.4mm, in stock that looks like it's about 1.5mm-2mm thick. That's tough to do. A pin roller can't go through stock that thick. A vertical punch with many long, tiny pins is too fragile. Mechanical drilling would be slow, with all those holes. Chemical etching that deep is tough. But tiny round holes are the best case for laser drilling.

      It's a very Jobs sort of thing. Most devices with ventilating or speaker holes have ones that big enough to admit foreign objects. But with laser drilling, you can make holes so small a staple or pin can't get through.

  41. Re:Other rumours... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats how we got goatse.

  42. My predictions. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

    A netbook with a dual core Atom for only $399. Software available through Itunes and will have the option to use the iPhone as a modem via bluetooth or WiFi.

    The mini will be gone. Apple will introduce the Apple Brick. It is a bit bigger than a mini but will have a PCI-E slot to allow you to upgrade your video.

    Of course I am totally making this up so if you don't agree who cares.

    But if I am right, all bow before the all knowing LWATCDR.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  43. Re:Nvidia & Apple aren't really know for relia by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but some of us actually happen to like Unix-like OSes.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  44. Notebook-sized iPhone? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    How about an iPhone that's remounted inside a 9x12" notebook case, only a few millimeters thin with a bigger battery and a 1600x1200 pixel multitouch screen? Not a "Mac", but an actual iPhone (including phone), with iPhone UI and OS, but configured to feature the apps and data network, and the same iPhone telephony SW just left "off to the sides".

    Price it at $500, and it won't compete with either iPhones (or iPods) or the low-end Mac notebooks. But it will give a desktop audience for the iPhone platform, with all the existing iPhone apps. Without much extra investment in engineering a new product line. Innovations in the "iPhoneBook" product could also drive features in either notebook or iPhone lines.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  45. HP Pavilion Slimline and Mac mini by tepples · · Score: 1

    There's a big difference between what ought to be and what is.

    I'm familiar with the is-ought problem. So how do I work to change "ought" to "is"?

    Most people aren't going to have a computer set up in such a way that it's a good fit for party gaming. In general, the screen is small and the location is set up for 1 person to sit at it comfortably.

    One of my co-workers uses an HP Pavilion Slimline at work. It isn't much bigger or much more expensive than an Xbox 360. (Mac mini is even smaller, roughly the size of a Wii console.) And like an Xbox 360 or a PS3, a PC can be hooked up to an HDTV through the VGA port or (using a $40 scan converter) even an SDTV. So why don't more HDTVs have a Windows PC or a Mac mini by them?

    but with things as they (largely still) are, "indie party gaming" isn't a big genre.

    So if I develop and sell copies of a party game for Windows and Mac OS X, will I find a large market of HTPC (home theater personal computing) enthusiasts and few competitors? Or how can I encourage HDTV owners to connect a PC?

    1. Re:HP Pavilion Slimline and Mac mini by danaris · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So if I develop and sell copies of a party game for Windows and Mac OS X, will I find a large market of HTPC (home theater personal computing) enthusiasts and few competitors?

      Few competitors? Probably. Large market? Not from what I've seen.

      So far as I can tell, HTPCs are largely of interest to us geeks—and only accessible to geeks of greater-than-average income (or debt, depending on the level of financial good sense). I think they're gaining some traction, but by and large, if your average person is going to have something connected to their television besides a DVD/VCR, cable/satellite box, or Big 3 game console, it's going to be a cable/satellite-company provided DVR (which may simply double as the cable box), or a TiVo.

      So why don't more HDTVs have a Windows PC or a Mac mini by them?

      From where I sit, I see 3 main reasons:

      1. Price. Most people have one computer, and it's a desktop, and they want to sit at it and use it like a computer. If they have a second computer, it's probably a laptop (or just their older desktop).
      2. Ignorance. Most people don't even know that you can do something like that.
      3. Lack of a compelling reason. Most people, even if they knew that you could do something like that, wouldn't care. As I said, they've got their desktop, and maybe their laptop; even if they have the cash to burn on another computer for the living room, what does it really get them? They can already play DVDs; they're not torrenting tons of shows; anything they do download, they're OK with watching on their computer screens.

      Essentially, it just isn't worth it to most people to have a computer whose sole purpose is to be hooked up to their television. I'm sure that as convergence proceeds and prices drop (assuming this financial meltdown doesn't destroy civilization as we know it first), there will come a point at which the features are good enough, the price is low enough, and there's some killer app that finally drives sales of computers intended to be combination DVR/game machine/general-purpose living room computers. However, that time is still a ways away.

      Now, going back to the original point, that's not to say that we won't start to see more casual/party games intended for HTPCs before they really take off among non-geeks. For independent developers, even though the geek market isn't large, it could still be large enough to support moderate-to-low-budget development. But it's still quite a gamble at this point, and I don't think that even many geeks are thinking of HTPCs as party gaming machines...which makes it a chicken-and-egg problem, like so many out there.

      Dan Aris

      --
      Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
  46. Next Time We Will Be Prepared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is that you say? Steve Jobs is going to speak?

    In Other News
    Popular technology news website slashdot.org was shut down today. A slashdot spokesman is quoted as saying: "We just couldn't handle a million Mac douche bags all jizzing at once. We hope to have the mess cleaned up and to be back on our feet shortly . We never anticipate this much jizz. In reaction to this, we are going to take the unprecedented step of doubling our mop farm. October 14th is anticipated to be a messy day and we want to be prepared." The spokesman confidently ended by stating: "Believe me, next time we will be prepared!"

  47. hmmm. lots of refurb models in stock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Historically, when ever Apple has been prepping a product release, they push out all the used gear of the same model from the clearance pages of the Apple Store into the distribution channel, that way the channel is holding the bag of old stock. That's my barometer of what is coming down the pike.

    The only thing missing from the Apple Store Refurb pages at this time is the mac mini - air, pro and plain old mac books are there, as are iMacs and 8-way Mac Pros.

    PS. i can't see what use a solid chunk of aluminium carved out would be unless you're selling an encryption box to the feds or perhaps as the foundation for a compter that doesn't have a hinge and needs to be sturdier as it lives topless.

  48. Re:Moo? by MacColossus · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Offtopic? Someone posts moo and I reply with a piece of Apple history. Just because you don't know who Clarus is and were too lazy to click the link doesn't make me offtopic.

  49. Rebrickulous by DECS · · Score: 0, Troll

    The Brick rumors are all bs. Why pundits feel the need to connect brick to anything is beyond silly.

    Rebrickulous: Cutting Through The MacBook Rumors

  50. Re:Nvidia & Apple aren't really know for relia by myz24 · · Score: 1

    Are you serious? Apple is near or at the top of every reliability chart I've never seen. I'd happily review any sources you might have.

  51. Re:Nvidia & Apple aren't really know for relia by myz24 · · Score: 1

    What makes the OS crap?

  52. Re:I'll buy apple... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    Wooosh (n) Sound made when something flies over your head.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  53. Whippersnappers! by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 4, Funny

    Keyboard AND Mouse? Duke Nukem 3D? That's not old-school! Why you young pups, I remember when mouselook was just a crazy gleam in a programmer's eye. You think aiming sucks with an analog stick? Try using the freaking number pad.

    And I remember REAL old-school first person shooters, the ones where we ran around the backyard pointing sticks at each other going "pew pew" and arguing over who got hit first.

    I guess I should add "get off my lawn."

    1. Re:Whippersnappers! by Kleen13 · · Score: 1

      LOL... don't forget "Nuh-uh! I have a force shield!"

      --
      That sinking feeling deep in your gut when you KNOW you screwed up bad summed up with: {head desk} {head desk}
    2. Re:Whippersnappers! by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 1

      Haha or "I killed you... TO INFINITY"

    3. Re:Whippersnappers! by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      "get off my lawn."

      No, I can't your yard is surrounded by a moat of lava. I'm going to have to pick all of your flowers to defuse the lava to form a landbridge to the kingdom of the dwarf Giants, where I left my bike and my Jet.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    4. Re:Whippersnappers! by Kleen13 · · Score: 1

      Ya, Well my dad is...... sigh.. nevermind

      --
      That sinking feeling deep in your gut when you KNOW you screwed up bad summed up with: {head desk} {head desk}
    5. Re:Whippersnappers! by Dr+Dodgy · · Score: 1

      Yeah? Well I killed you infinity plus 1!

    6. Re:Whippersnappers! by Jabbrwokk · · Score: 1

      Wow, that took me back and sounded REAL familiar... you didn't grow up on my street, didja?

  54. a different prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's what I think the Brick is:

    It's a new incarnation of the laptop power brick, that has a 2nd backup battery built into it (so when you are plugged in you are recharging 2 batteries not just one), as well as some additional ports that there's no room for on the new category of thinner, lighter sub-notebooks like the Air.

    An externalized battery also allows for all sorts of new creative designs and meets the power hungry needs of mobile multi-media users.

  55. mini = perfect soho server by gobbo · · Score: 1

    Small businesses often have sporadic file sharing and database needs throughout the day, it isn't unusual to find a company with a need for a 10-client semi-custom db.

    The mini is a perfect machine for this. Enough power for small networks. Silent, cool, sips power, reliable, and can be screwed to a wall or under a desk, so it is invisible too. Easy to run headless, set it and forget it, with built-in tools for automation and no licensing grief and hardly any set-up time... and in a pinch, the local in-house semi-geek can perform maintenance (say, when the sftp backup fails) with gui tools.

    I've set up a number of these, running multiple services. Usually, I don't hear from the company again until they need upgrades; everything just works, and their TCO winds up being really low.

  56. Just give us a docking station! by erroneus · · Score: 1

    Geez! Would it really be so hard to build a macbook pro to support a docking station? I mean really. If there is one thing keeping it off of executive desktops, it's that. Actually, I support several executives on MacBook pros but if the next version was capable of supporting a docking station, I'd be buying more... (and wondering what to do with the old ones... I know where one or two would be going... hehehe)

    1. Re:Just give us a docking station! by I+kan+Spl · · Score: 1

      http://www.bookendzdocks.com/

      Aftermarket, but I have seen them work well.

      --
      My UID is prime and so is this number: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0.
    2. Re:Just give us a docking station! by erroneus · · Score: 1

      I've seen those... not quite good enough. I do like the design for the MacBooks though... at least it is only on one side. The MacbookPro isn't good enough.

  57. Re:Nvidia & Apple aren't really know for relia by not+already+in+use · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but some of us actually happen to like Unix-like OSes.

    Which was my main motivation for buying a Mac. It didn't take long to realize that the pretty front-end desktop and the powerful Unix back-end were mutually exclusive.
    So if I want to view hidden files I need to use the freaking terminal? Would it really be so hard to add an option into finder? I need to resort to a command-line hack to do that? Just one example of many major annoyances.
    Oh, and the constant "it just works" mantra annoyed the shit out of me whenever I'd try to import pictures from my digicam and the shit would freeze, and I'd have to do it on a Windows box.

    --
    Similes are like metaphors
  58. Re:Nvidia & Apple aren't really know for relia by bonch · · Score: 1

    I'm overwhelmed by the sheer number of data sources you cited when making your claims! Help, I'm suffocating under the weight!

  59. Fan service... by argent · · Score: 1

    I didn't think any computer company had more powerful fans than Apple.

    1. Re:Fan service... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I can have both cores of a mini busting it's balls transcoding
      and I still can't detect this "wind tunnel effect" so many people
      like whine about. I even put my ear right in front of the thing.

                Mebbe this was a PPC era defect they corrected years and years
      ago.

                Trolls like to dredge up ancient history.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Fan service... by argent · · Score: 1

      I can have both cores of a mini busting it's balls transcoding and I still can't detect this "wind tunnel effect" so many people like whine about.

      I think you misunderstood the kind of fans I'm talking about.

      See, Apple's Fans make enough wind noise on Slashdot to make up for it.

  60. Re:Raising the bar for stock gfx is a positive mov by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    They like they fact that with a console you plug it in, turn it on and play.

    It will be a while before the PC gaming industry can offer that.

    YM it has been a long while since the PC gaming industry could offer that, sonny.

    Perhaps they should return to selling games on bootable disks.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  61. Re:Mew Mac Pro :( by ePhil_One · · Score: 1
    Personally, I'm waiting for an updated Mac Pro. God knows the current one is still a heck of a deal (assuming you upgrade it yourself); I've been searching for a similar Windows machine (8 cores & 2.8Ghz or better) but come up blank, even building my own. But I figure the next generation of Mac Pro's will be 12 core monsters w/ BluRay drives' etc.

    I want to get into HD Video, Play w/ Virtualization, run multiple OS's, etc. so yes, I need something that powerful. Here's a hint, if its not only 4 cores, its not as powerful. Don't care if you've overclocked and peltier cooled that single CPU to 5 Ghz.

    Anyway, that's my dream. I'm starting to save now :)

    --
    You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
  62. NVidia is irrelevant by billcopc · · Score: 1

    NVidia's chipsets are just an alternative to Intel, VIA, SIS etc. They're no longer "superior", unless you're hooked on SLI, in which case they're the only option.

    The only chipset that was markedly superior to the competition was the NForce2, when it was released. It was an affordable chipset that offered top-tier features at half the cost of feature-equivalent alternatives. Soundstorm was absolutely fantastic with its realtime AC3 encoding, unique at the time. That was six years ago, and they've been sucking miserably ever since.

    If NVidia weren't clutching to their SLI patents so tightly, they probably would have exited the market entirely. Their reputation got mangled by shoddy drivers, it took them four years to stop their ATA drivers from randomly scrambling data, making them the laughing stock of the industry.

    It's quite simple: if you want gaming performance, don't look at the chipset, look at a decent PCI-Express graphics card. There's no shortage of them, but what the Mac needs is driver support. The day people can trot down to any computer shop, pick up a GeForce BFG9000 or a Radeon EleventyOneHD, and drop it in their Mac - that's the day you'll start seeing real games on the Mac.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
    1. Re:NVidia is irrelevant by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the odds of that happening are basically zero. Even if the driver support of the very gods materialized tomorrow, who actually owns a mac that they could drop a PCIe card into? Mac mini? No. Macbook? No. Macbook Pro? No. iMac? No. Only the Mac Pro has PCIe slots. Now, the Pro is an excellent deal for a workstation class machine; but with a base model at $2,800 it is pretty much worthless as a gaming option.

      Apple could fix this, by releasing the basic mac tower that essentially everybody running OSX86 wishes existed; but they seem to be enjoying their present vantage point, well above the knife-fight-in-a-telephone-booth market that is lowend to midrange x86 desktops.

    2. Re:NVidia is irrelevant by Maserati · · Score: 1

      Drop one of the CPUs from a Mac pro and you save US$500 on a BTO machine. Not only does that take a big bite out of the price, but you can plug in a matching CPU later. A QuadCore Xeon box with an 8800 GT (SLI supported) is still a powerful gaming rig, and it's got a lot of room for drives, RAM, miscellaneous PCI cards and a second optical drive. Mine's on a truck right now.

      Go ahead, drool: http://www.apple.com/macpro/design.html

      The drive bays on the Pro are totally sweet. It has 4 SATA bays. Pop the side of the case off and they're lined up horizontally in top of the case, each one is an L-shaped plate with captive screws for mounting a drive. You pull one out, screw in the drive and slide it back in to where the power and data connectors on the drive slide into their mates. Easiest drive installation you'll ever do.

      The Pro is whisper silent too, having lots of fans means none of them have to work too hard.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    3. Re:NVidia is irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That brings the price down to $2300, which means it costs as much as a small stack of normal desktops rather than a large stack. And judging by the back panel, that nice case isn't ATX-standard, so it'll be worthless after the motherboard becomes obsolete.

      If they would just build a damn Mini with desktop parts and open slots, I would literally buy one tomorrow.

    4. Re:NVidia is irrelevant by billcopc · · Score: 1

      It is indeed a very nice machine, and if money were no object, I would be very tempted to get a top-end Mac Pro for myself. The problem is they make computers look ridiculously expensive.

      There is no good reason for them to charge a fortune on upgrades, as it is plainly apparent to anyone doing the slightest bit of Googling that they are gouging like mad. There's no special "Apple quality" to 3rd party hardware, they just plug it in and resell. A Maxtor drive from Apple will blow up just as quickly as a Maxtor drive from TigerDirect.

      From a PC builder's perspective, a Mac Pro consists of the following:

      1. custom high-end motherboard (worth ~$400)
      2. luxury tower chassis (worth ~$300)
      3. top-end Intel Xeon processors ($500+ each)
      4. the oh-so-lovely Mac OS ($300 ?)
      5. a bunch of plain old PC components for the rest

      Ram, hard drives, fans and power supplies: these are cheap commodities you can buy anywhere, so why is it that Apple places such an exorbitant premium on such items ? I'd be much more comfortable paying a premium for the Apple-made components... sure, charge a fortune for the case, board and OS - those are the unique components that make it a Mac, and even I would gladly pay the big bucks for that luxury, but don't insult people with 300% markup on everyday items.

      Gouging on the upgrades only serves to make the Mac Pro absolutely uncompetitive in the high-end segment. If I'm in the market for an 8-core workstation with tons of Ram and disk space, an upgrade Mac costs on average 3 times as much as a same-spec PC from any leading vendor. Why spend $20K on a fully-kitted Mac Pro when a PC or hackintosh with the very same specs can be had for a third of that, and with a better warranty.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  63. Re:I'll buy apple... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean apple has moved from marijuana to cocaine?

  64. Oh the markets! by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    "'I can't afford a laptop' market, and this is growing steadily smaller."

    I think you may need to reevaluate that, in view of the, hum, notable news of the last few days...

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  65. Re:Nvidia & Apple aren't really know for relia by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    Sounds like you got a lemon, or you broke it somehow.

    There are a lot of things wrong with OS X (the Finder being a bit of an old dog that really needs some love) but the fancy UI and the Terminal being two faces of the same OS is by design.

    It's something of a sensationalist term to call using the terminal to view hidden files as a "command line hack" - I think you're just trying to justify hating the OS. There are other ways to view hidden files, like replacing Finder with a third party file management app, for example.

    When designing a UI that is intuitive, easy to use and provides the majority of users with everything that they need, you sometimes have to make compromises. Maybe they go too far in the simplistic direction sometimes, but they do offer all the control of the OS you need if you want to dig a little deeper and be hands on - hence the Terminal and the ability to edit the plain-text/human readable preference files. A so called power user isn't going to mind that turning off the iTunes store links requires either editing the pref file directly or using a terminal command to do the job instead of the UI-method.

    I'll be the first to say that it's not all sweetness and roses with apple, but your original post, and the followup are just sour trolling. Apples go wrong, and when they do, in the vast, vast majority of cases they are fixed without hassle with one of the best warranty/service programs in the industry. In a few high-profile cases, someone with an axe to grind will moan about how they bought a Powerbook and it broke and Steve Jobs personally came round to his house and fucked his wife then said "sorry, can't fix your powerbook".

    Feel free to email Apple with suggestions about how to improve the OS - they do take feedback. Hidden files in the Finder is a big request, and I'm assuming that at some point we'll see an all-new revamped Finder, since it is the current dog of an otherwise very nice OS.

  66. Re:Raising the bar for stock gfx is a positive mov by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless, i don't know, if you have a very limited number of hardware combinations. But what hardware/OS vendor might be perfectly positioned for that...

  67. Alas, the mini doesn't do the right rez. for TVs by diggory · · Score: 1

    I've got a mini connected to my HD LCD TV via DVi->HDMI cable, and I love it - it offers far more flexibility than an AppleTV, although you sacrifice usability. I tend to VNC into it from my laptop, whereas the AppleTV UI is designed to be operated via the simple remote. Unfortunately iTunes won't let you download HD content to a desktop machine, only AppleTV units are allowed that privilege. There also appears to be an issue with the integrated graphics card/processor which means it doesn't output the correct resolution, so you get black borders (the output doesn't fill the entire screen) http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en-gb&q=mac+mini+tv+borders&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8 If anyone knows how to solve this I'd be glad to hear about it.

  68. Re:I'll buy apple... by johanatan · · Score: 1

    Actually, I think he was trying to tell the joke but a little late to the game!

  69. Re:Nvidia & Apple aren't really know for relia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple's hardware is no better than any other manufacturer and the OS is crap, but they made it pretty which is all that matters in the shallow minds of their consumers.

    And just why is it crap?

    I mean, it's not like the bastard-child-product-of-a-million-amateurs linux, now is it?

    And Windows.. well... we won't go there.

  70. Re:Nvidia & Apple aren't really know for relia by falconwolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nvidia? That'd be just awesome. I can't think of any other way to make Apple hardware (already more prone to need warranty service than any other manufacturer's product that I can name) any less reliable.

    Apple consistently has high high customer satisfaction year after year. I'm typing this on a MacBook Pro I've had for almost 14 months and the only tyme I've taken it down to an Apple store, there are 4 within half hour's drive, was when I got it. Some software I ordered with it was old. I have not had a single hardware problem whereas with 3 new PCs, a Gateway and an HP with Windows and a no name brand PC with Linux preinstalled, the hdd and mobos failed within the first year.

    Falcon

  71. Re:Raising the bar for stock gfx is a positive mov by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

    The one that isn't interesting in making a gaming platform?

  72. Re:Wait for ture2way before getting a apple drv as by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry, it's like you're trying to communicate but failing somehow.

  73. Ati and nvidia have superior on board video next t by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Ati and nvidia have superior on board video next to intel looks good on paper video but the there drivers suck.

    also the ATI boards have SIDE PORT ram.

  74. Re:Nvidia & Apple aren't really know for relia by not+already+in+use · · Score: 1

    It's something of a sensationalist term to call using the terminal to view hidden files as a "command line hack" - I think you're just trying to justify hating the OS

    When you spend $3000 on a laptop you try very hard to justify not hating it, trust me. I gave it two years of fair use, and that was enough. Bottom line, Windows does everything OS X does and does it better.

    --
    Similes are like metaphors
  75. Re:Nvidia & Apple aren't really know for relia by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    When you spend $3000 on a laptop you try very hard to justify not hating it, trust me. I gave it two years of fair use, and that was enough. Bottom line, Windows does everything OS X does and does it better.

    So Windows has better security/keyloggers/malware, better integration of video and audio with the OS, better browsing, better track record on viruses, better links with open source, better development environment, better Office apps, better networking, better cross platform integration with non-windows systems, better built in tools for managing your photos and for making your own home movies and DVDs, better support for games.... oh wait, it does have better games support.

    So, you think it does all those things better because it has an option in Explorer to show hidden files in the GUI and Finder does not (which is a point I have already conceded about some of the shortcomings of the Finder)?

    Since you say it was 2 years old and $3000 I'll assume you had a BTO 17" Powerbook. With a machine like that, there must have been something deeper if you're trying to justify not hating it, or perhaps even selling it, given the high (but obviously not 100% return) resale value.

    Or given how much you seemed to detest it and try to justify the cost, you didn't spend 5 seconds googling or looking through the *vast* number of open source/shareware/third party apps for the Mac for a Finder replacement like Pathfinder.

    I think maybe you tripped over an Apple II as a kid and have been carrying a grudge ever since.

  76. Re:Raising the bar for stock gfx is a positive mov by eniacfoa · · Score: 1

    installing software is easy under windows, even for idiots...i dont think thats the main problem. its the fact there is little knowledge of gfx cards and controllers on PC amongst the masses. If the PC came standard with a gfx card that had minimum capabilities the software industry agreed on, fairly comparable to the current gen consoles and the PC came with a control pad I believe that would have a significant positive impact on the computer gaming platform. also, things like spore DRM only make people angry. Completely negative to the industry. I will never pay for an EA game EVER again until they change their DRM policy. Most of their games suck anyway. You wonder where all the money went when you play one of their games...

  77. Re:Raising the bar for stock gfx is a positive mov by eniacfoa · · Score: 1

    woops - i meant installing software under windows/mac, see 1st sentence.

  78. Re:Raising the bar for stock gfx is a positive mov by eniacfoa · · Score: 1

    or the industry could just agree on shit which is more likely than apple doing anything cool with computers.

  79. Re:Nvidia & Apple aren't really know for relia by not+already+in+use · · Score: 1

    So Windows has better security/keyloggers/malware, better integration of video and audio with the OS, better browsing, better track record on viruses, better links with open source, better development environment, better Office apps, better networking, better cross platform integration with non-windows systems, better built in tools for managing your photos and for making your own home movies and DVDs, better support for games.... oh wait, it does have better games support.

    Yes. Apple has had two root escalation vulnerabilities come to light in the last couple of months, and were way behind everyone else in patching that widespread DNS vulnerability. Apple is perfectly happy with their tiny market share because it gives the perception of security since it isn't targeted by virus makers. Better development? Yes. How marketable and approachable is objective-c? That's Apple's first strike with development. I'll take Visual Studio over XCode any day of the week. And Office apps? Are you serious? What Office apps are you implying are better on Mac? Microsoft Office?!?

    So, you think it does all those things better because it has an option in Explorer to show hidden files in the GUI and Finder does not (which is a point I have already conceded about some of the shortcomings of the Finder)?

    Argument fail, dude. That's just one example of something I find ridiculously wrong with OS X. The little things matter.

    Since you say it was 2 years old and $3000 I'll assume you had a BTO 17" Powerbook. With a machine like that, there must have been something deeper if you're trying to justify not hating it, or perhaps even selling it, given the high (but obviously not 100% return) resale valu

    Wrong, 2.13 ghz 15" macbook pro with 2gig ram. Oh by the way? Widespread manufacturing error caused an entire generation of these to be shipped with gobs of thermal paste on the processor, video chip, and northbridge, effectively insulating them from heatsink. Apple would not aknowledge this as a problem and people were left with laptops that would burn the shit out of their legs and run hot.

    Or given how much you seemed to detest it and try to justify the cost, you didn't spend 5 seconds googling or looking through the *vast* number of open source/shareware/third party apps for the Mac for a Finder replacement like Pathfinder.

    Way to defend OS X. "OS X isn't that bad when you replace system components with third party solutions!"

    I think really the last straw were people like you. The kind of people I didn't want to be associated with by owning an Apple (a contributing factor in moving away from Linux, among it's many other downfalls). People who use Windows don't care if someone else uses OS X or Linux. They don't care, because they're normal people who don't feel the need become attached to an operating system and become evangelistic and defend it and take critisisms of it personally. Bash Windows, my operating system of choice. I don't give a fuck, I know it has it's own downfalls. Now realize the same with your OS of choice and you won't sound like a smarmy douche bag.

    --
    Similes are like metaphors
  80. Re:Raising the bar for stock gfx is a positive mov by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

    Not all of us want computer games, you know. The only reason I'd have for buying non-Apple stuff was if I wanted to set-up a good gaming machine. For most other things, I prefer Apple.

  81. Re:Nvidia & Apple aren't really know for relia by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    I think really the last straw were people like you. The kind of people I didn't want to be associated with by owning an Apple (a contributing factor in moving away from Linux, among it's many other downfalls). People who use Windows don't care if someone else uses OS X or Linux. They don't care, because they're normal people who don't feel the need become attached to an operating system and become evangelistic and defend it and take critisisms of it personally. Bash Windows, my operating system of choice. I don't give a fuck, I know it has it's own downfalls. Now realize the same with your OS of choice and you won't sound like a smarmy douche bag.

    I find it amusing that you end with this when a large portion of my post has been highly critical of OS X, including specific criticisms of the Finder, which badly needs replacement, not just because it has no option to show hidden files but for myriad reasons that make it a bit of a dog.

    I just took issue with your sensationalism to justify your argument. I don;t care that you don;t like OS X. I know many people that do, but the Fox News rhetoric does you no favours.

    I really, really don;t see how you can come to the conclusion that I'm evangelistically defending OS X based on this discussion thread.

    I offered Pathfinder as an alternative if you really couldn't live with Finder's shortfalls and didn't want to break open a shell. The third party tools are there if you need them.

    I like OS X, it does what I need it to do. Use any OS you want, but judge the ones you hate on genuine criticism. I absolutely hate how, in the new Mail.app, you cannot have the mailbox draw on the right hand side of the screen any more. I petitioned Apple to allow it, and taled about it extensively on discussion forums that it was just fine before, and now its fixed forever on the left.

    I'm not going to respond to a "what's wrong with OS X" question with "nothing! it's the most perfect OS ever and I want Steve Jobs' babies!" so chill out.

  82. Re:Nvidia & Apple aren't really know for relia by jo_ham · · Score: 1

    Oh, and as an addendum, yes, Microsoft Office for Mac is much better than the Windows version. The two suites are written by totally different teams within Microsoft and the Mac version, which it has its quirks and frustrations like any large software project, is a much nicer set of apps than the windows version.

    And yes, I do use both on a fairly regular basis.

    I don;t think I'm alone in this assessment of MS Office Mac compared to MS Office Windows. They really can write some excellent software in Redmond when they put their minds to it.

  83. Open-source DirectX by bentob0x · · Score: 1

    That's the remedy ...