Sure mr. Putin, we already have a piece of software to accomplish just that. It's called "openssl" and it can generate any encryption key ever used in the past and in the future. It may take some time though.
No it's not well known, but it is frequently asserted by people who want to spin things that way.
Believe whatever makes you sleep at night.
So, people used to argue that abolishing slavery was against the public interest, as it would damage the economy, ruin long-held family estates, etc. Would you consider abolishing slavery to be immoral? No? I see.
You're being willfully trollish and ignorant. We're done.
So it comes down to what you think is "in the public interest."
Very easy to tell when you're not being willfully trollish and ignorant. But then again your whole thought process could be flawed courtesy of the horribly butchered american indoctrinational system.
I, for example, don't think it's in the public interest to establish and maintain a dependency-creating welfare state.
There we go, now you tore off your mask. Just another right wing reactionary propagandist at work.
people suddenly evil an immoral when they seek to persuade legislators to see things their way?
Yes, because legislators ought to act in the public interest because - as it is the case for the US - the alternative is plutocracy.
No, the US calls it "freedom of assembly and speech," and it's protected under the very first amendment of the constitution.
What a peculiar spin you've got there! It is well known that the US is not a democracy but a plutocracy so even if i were to concede your point i would be simply pointing out another way for the rich to have their way against the public interest, simply because granting this (very much bent) definition of "freedom of speech and assembly" grants them the economic upper hand. I don't care how you spin it, anything against the public interest is clearly IMMORAL.
Slashdot Mirror
You have nothing. Thought so. Bye.
Back up your assertions.
Mod parent troll.
EU privacy laws hellloooooooo
It's times like these that i love my european life the most.
Is this the same Sibanda? https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Can i upgrade it to Windows 10 for free?
Oh noes the offer has expired!
Seriously though, who wants to bet on the first hull loss?!
Pointless. I prefer civilized protest.
I can't leave it blank because slashdot yells at me. Have you even tried?
Yep, that's bullshit.
Ok then.
AES128 it is!
CUI BONO?
No, seriously, i want to know who lobbied for this and who will benefit from this.
Sure mr. Putin, we already have a piece of software to accomplish just that.
It's called "openssl" and it can generate any encryption key ever used in the past and in the future.
It may take some time though.
The problem is that people are just easily-penetrable-by-high-velocity-projectiles sacks of meat and blood.
No it's not well known, but it is frequently asserted by people who want to spin things that way.
Believe whatever makes you sleep at night.
So, people used to argue that abolishing slavery was against the public interest, as it would damage the economy, ruin long-held family estates, etc. Would you consider abolishing slavery to be immoral? No? I see.
You're being willfully trollish and ignorant. We're done.
So it comes down to what you think is "in the public interest."
Very easy to tell when you're not being willfully trollish and ignorant. But then again your whole thought process could be flawed courtesy of the horribly butchered american indoctrinational system.
I, for example, don't think it's in the public interest to establish and maintain a dependency-creating welfare state.
There we go, now you tore off your mask. Just another right wing reactionary propagandist at work.
people suddenly evil an immoral when they seek to persuade legislators to see things their way?
Yes, because legislators ought to act in the public interest because - as it is the case for the US - the alternative is plutocracy.
No, the US calls it "freedom of assembly and speech," and it's protected under the very first amendment of the constitution.
What a peculiar spin you've got there!
It is well known that the US is not a democracy but a plutocracy so even if i were to concede your point i would be simply pointing out another way for the rich to have their way against the public interest, simply because granting this (very much bent) definition of "freedom of speech and assembly" grants them the economic upper hand.
I don't care how you spin it, anything against the public interest is clearly IMMORAL.
The rest of the world calls it corruption.
The US calls it 'lobbying'.
Spot on!
Quick! Send in the homeopathic astronauts!
Why bother? Just use chromium...
AKA the most important experiment on the way to the eerie cashless society.
Humanity has failed me again.
Awesome, it also forces you to correct your mistakes.
Thank you.
I call it the Kissinger approach to foreign relations.
Sounds just like the american bullying--- i mean justice system.