He said that if you're a star they let you do anything, but he didn't say why they let you do anything. It's your speculation that that's because they are afraid of him. If he had said "a boss" I would have agreed with you. Because "boss" means authority over people. But he said "a star". There are always many "gold digging" women around stars. They let him do it because they don't mind it, because that's how they dig their gold. They know it and he knows it.
He said "when you are a star they let you do anything". A star. He didn't say "when you are a boss...". What he meant was when you are a star or a rich person, women "jump" on you. And this is true. Not for all women, but for many enough.
Such things are unprovable.
All these "ip ranges" and "Russian working hours"...
Why should I believe the US that the ip ranges were from Russia? The US is an interested party in this.
What proof can they they show me of the ip ranges and working hours that can't be falsified? Such a proof does not cannot exist.
Besides hackers can use proxy servers as well as work at night.
Hillary said US should use 'military response' to fight cyberattacks "As President, I will make it clear that the United States will treat cyberattacks just like any other attack. We will be ready with serious political, economic, and military responses" https://www.techdirt.com/artic...
And this was after blaming Russia for the hacks
>> the risen interest in military co-operation is a direct result of their own actions.
It's vise versa. As a result of Kiev "revolution" of 2013, pro-NATO forces came into power in Ukraine. That's why Russia took actions.
Same with Georgia, where pro-Nato president came into power after color revolution in 2003.
So maybe they can hide "https" for self-signed connections? I mean self-signed certificates is an easy and free way to encrypt connection. If I only want to encrypt connection so it remained unmodified, then a self-signed certificate is enough.
"SSL means your "list of local historical sites" remains exactly as you wrote it"
Easy solution. Allow self-signed certificates. Don't show crazy warnings about self signed certificates. Because an https connection with a self signed certificate is not less secure than http. Actually it's more secure.
Totalitarianism is a concept in which the state holds total authority over the society and seeks to control all aspects of public and private life wherever possible. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
As far as I remember, at first the international investigators couldn't begin the investigation because of the fighting near the crash site. So it wasn't "deep in the rebel controlled area". This picture from the BBC web site also proves it: http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news... (from this page: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-... )
Slashdot Mirror
You're twisting my words because you don't understand or is pretending that you don't understand what I just told you
He said that if you're a star they let you do anything, but he didn't say why they let you do anything. It's your speculation that that's because they are afraid of him. If he had said "a boss" I would have agreed with you. Because "boss" means authority over people. But he said "a star". There are always many "gold digging" women around stars. They let him do it because they don't mind it, because that's how they dig their gold. They know it and he knows it.
He said "when you are a star they let you do anything". A star. He didn't say "when you are a boss...". What he meant was when you are a star or a rich person, women "jump" on you. And this is true. Not for all women, but for many enough.
>> The code samples and log litter is given the name "Bear"
HA HA HA!!
Such things are unprovable. All these "ip ranges" and "Russian working hours"... Why should I believe the US that the ip ranges were from Russia? The US is an interested party in this. What proof can they they show me of the ip ranges and working hours that can't be falsified? Such a proof does not cannot exist. Besides hackers can use proxy servers as well as work at night.
This is not an evidence. This is just words "they could do it"
Hillary said US should use 'military response' to fight cyberattacks
"As President, I will make it clear that the United States will treat cyberattacks just like any other attack. We will be ready with serious political, economic, and military responses"
https://www.techdirt.com/artic...
And this was after blaming Russia for the hacks
>> the risen interest in military co-operation is a direct result of their own actions.
It's vise versa. As a result of Kiev "revolution" of 2013, pro-NATO forces came into power in Ukraine. That's why Russia took actions.
Same with Georgia, where pro-Nato president came into power after color revolution in 2003.
creating an account in a social media, uploading one's own photos has always seemed kind of narcissistic to me
They will cut themselves off of a large amount of information on business, economy, science and so forth. It will decrease their competitive ability.
It's impossible to enforce such a ban. Unless they're going to make their own mobile operating OS an messaging apps
maybe I should be afraid to visit slashdot now
Still better than http. But I said "If I want to encrypt". But I don't want to. I think this problem is exaggerated. Most websites just don't need it
So maybe they can hide "https" for self-signed connections? I mean self-signed certificates is an easy and free way to encrypt connection. If I only want to encrypt connection so it remained unmodified, then a self-signed certificate is enough.
There's no such thing as crying wolf in this case. The users just need to be taught if you see red, don't enter your credit card.
The users just need to be taught if you don't see green, or "https" or whatever icon they show now for https sites, don't enter your credit card.
They don't show http(s): in the address bar anymore
"SSL means your "list of local historical sites" remains exactly as you wrote it"
Easy solution. Allow self-signed certificates. Don't show crazy warnings about self signed certificates. Because an https connection with a self signed certificate is not less secure than http. Actually it's more secure.
So they are forcing identification of all website owners.
"from each according to his ability, to each according to his need"
Not even the second
http://nasawatch.com/archives/...
Totalitarianism is a concept in which the state holds total authority over the society and seeks to control all aspects of public and private life wherever possible.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
It's like you walk in the street and are afraid of anybody just because they can physically do you harm. It's called phobia or paranoia
Because there's no real alternative
As far as I remember, at first the international investigators couldn't begin the investigation because of the fighting near the crash site. So it wasn't "deep in the rebel controlled area". This picture from the BBC web site also proves it: http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news... (from this page: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-... )
Ukraine also has BUKs. So you can't unambiguously infer who fired the rocket just because it was a BUK. (IF it was a BUK)