Incorrect. Many markets do have SD DTV broadcasts, usually as a subchannel riding along with a primary HD stream. My local market has at least four that I can think of offhand, and there might be a couple more I don't know about. This is nowhere near a top market.
I'm sure there are markets with no SD broadcasts but this is not universal, and I would definitely wager that it's not "most" stations as you say.
This foreshadowing has been going on for 20 years. Electronic Arts tried to claim that they owned the copyrights to images created with Deluxe Paint and the courts smacked them down. The only reason things like this can even possibly fly now is because they're not going quite so far as to claim full copyright, but rather claiming that via EULA they have an irrevocable license to the content.
how was that a troll, here we obviously have a little pudfucker who thinks that trolling epileptics is proper and correct, and i merely told him to do what he should have already done
he's the troll, not me, so fuck you too mods - NOW this is trolling
"In fact, Edison arrived at his advances on his own. There is no evidence that Edison drew on knowledge of Scott's work to create his phonograph, and he retains the distinction of being the first to reproduce sound."
So basically, these companies are crying over the fact that, if you search on a term that gives you this extra site: search box, that maybe you'll see ads from competitors? Despite the fact that the primary search results that you'll get will ALL be from the company's site?
BOO FUCKING HOO
So Google has made site: more easily accessible to the average user. Big fucking whoop. These companies can go pound sand as far as I'm concerned. Who the hell clicks on the sponsored links anyway?
The net's full of it. I've been a mod or admin in the Sonic the Hedgehog scene for damn near 10 years now, and we've seen more drama than you can shake a stick at. This is just more of the same. Ignore it, and it'll go away.
What the fuck are you talking about? That video is not interlaced, in fact it's been deinterlaced via blending, which looks like MORE shit than just leaving the mice teeth in.
ObPhonoPorn:
Oh, true enough--I was just finding the logical way to go about things should the Pornographic Institute (is it an "Institute" because they're all a bunch of nutters?) get their way in this.
And I think the ISPs would be very happy to do that, too--after all, if the Pornographers have no internet connection, they can't go searching for people to cut the connections of--and if they can't find anyone to cut off, the ISP can't be sued if the Pornographers are wrong.
The only thing I can find referencing anything like this situation is this result on Google Books. It doesn't mention if the grocery store won or not, though.
brought evidence to school, used monitored equipment to crow about what they did
Nowhere in the article does it state that they put the photos on Facebook from school. Therefore, your troll moderation is correct.
Sad thing is, the poll on that article is favoring the "yes" side of the question. As long as such things are not done on school time with school equipment then the school should have no right to do anything because of it.
So, if I buy a new drive from you and have you replace my old one with the new one, you're suddenly entitled to the old one for some reason? Remember, Dave *did* pay, $160 for 80GB. At that rate thy should give him the old drive back on a silver platter.
Talent has nothing to do with getting laid. The trick is to say you're in a band. Whereas no amount of Guitar Hero skill will get you anything. Maybe not for you...
Right. However, this story isn't in any way concerned with patents. Even if Hormel has patents relating to SPAM, that doesn't affect whether a business in an unrelated field can use the word "Spam" in their name. This story is solely regarding Hormel's trademark assertion.
IANAL, but that is completely untrue. As I understand it, you're mostly just entitled to statutory and actual damages with a registration as opposed to just actual damages without one.
Way to take offense where there should have been none. The post did not say you were worthless, you brought that to the table. All that was said was that those who aren't biological parents are biological dead-ends, and that is the truth. If you're not having kids and passing on your genetic makeup, then it's a natural dead-end for your bloodline as it came to exist within you (as opposed to any possible biological brothers or sisters). Being a dead-end in biological and genetic terms has no bearing on your worthiness as a member of society.
And greed for power. Our four...no...amongst our enemies to political progress are such things as religion, ignorance, vested interests, and greed for power...I'll come in again.
how many MP3 players have you seen that are in the same style as the ipod? None, but I have seen small handheld fans that are obviously styled the same.
Slashdot Mirror
Incorrect. Many markets do have SD DTV broadcasts, usually as a subchannel riding along with a primary HD stream. My local market has at least four that I can think of offhand, and there might be a couple more I don't know about. This is nowhere near a top market.
I'm sure there are markets with no SD broadcasts but this is not universal, and I would definitely wager that it's not "most" stations as you say.
This foreshadowing has been going on for 20 years. Electronic Arts tried to claim that they owned the copyrights to images created with Deluxe Paint and the courts smacked them down. The only reason things like this can even possibly fly now is because they're not going quite so far as to claim full copyright, but rather claiming that via EULA they have an irrevocable license to the content.
how was that a troll, here we obviously have a little pudfucker who thinks that trolling epileptics is proper and correct, and i merely told him to do what he should have already done
he's the troll, not me, so fuck you too mods - NOW this is trolling
Please read the article next time:
"In fact, Edison arrived at his advances on his own. There is no evidence that Edison drew on knowledge of Scott's work to create his phonograph, and he retains the distinction of being the first to reproduce sound."
Illegal? Quit smoking crack you fucking idiot.
So basically, these companies are crying over the fact that, if you search on a term that gives you this extra site: search box, that maybe you'll see ads from competitors? Despite the fact that the primary search results that you'll get will ALL be from the company's site?
BOO FUCKING HOO
So Google has made site: more easily accessible to the average user. Big fucking whoop. These companies can go pound sand as far as I'm concerned. Who the hell clicks on the sponsored links anyway?
The net's full of it. I've been a mod or admin in the Sonic the Hedgehog scene for damn near 10 years now, and we've seen more drama than you can shake a stick at. This is just more of the same. Ignore it, and it'll go away.
What the fuck are you talking about? That video is not interlaced, in fact it's been deinterlaced via blending, which looks like MORE shit than just leaving the mice teeth in.
And I think the ISPs would be very happy to do that, too--after all, if the Pornographers have no internet connection, they can't go searching for people to cut the connections of--and if they can't find anyone to cut off, the ISP can't be sued if the Pornographers are wrong.
That old slag? I wouldn't be paid to listen to her sing, even naked and drunk.
Ends should never justify means unless the means are benign in the first place. The means matter a whole lot more than you think.
The only thing I can find referencing anything like this situation is this result on Google Books. It doesn't mention if the grocery store won or not, though.
Sad thing is, the poll on that article is favoring the "yes" side of the question. As long as such things are not done on school time with school equipment then the school should have no right to do anything because of it.
Preferences -> Comments -> Display Link Domains? -> Always show link domains
Problem solved.
Not bullshit.
So, if I buy a new drive from you and have you replace my old one with the new one, you're suddenly entitled to the old one for some reason? Remember, Dave *did* pay, $160 for 80GB. At that rate thy should give him the old drive back on a silver platter.
Right. However, this story isn't in any way concerned with patents. Even if Hormel has patents relating to SPAM, that doesn't affect whether a business in an unrelated field can use the word "Spam" in their name. This story is solely regarding Hormel's trademark assertion.
What braindead Slashdotter tagged this story with "patents"? It's a trademark issue, not a patent one.
IANAL, but that is completely untrue. As I understand it, you're mostly just entitled to statutory and actual damages with a registration as opposed to just actual damages without one.
Mine's got balls on it, mate. If yours has bells on it I suggest you seek immediate medical attention.
Way to take offense where there should have been none. The post did not say you were worthless, you brought that to the table. All that was said was that those who aren't biological parents are biological dead-ends, and that is the truth. If you're not having kids and passing on your genetic makeup, then it's a natural dead-end for your bloodline as it came to exist within you (as opposed to any possible biological brothers or sisters). Being a dead-end in biological and genetic terms has no bearing on your worthiness as a member of society.
And greed for power. Our four...no...amongst our enemies to political progress are such things as religion, ignorance, vested interests, and greed for power...I'll come in again.