At least there are plenty of us who are working on unbreakable hardware primitives in silicon that will keep these bastards at bay. It's about as nontrivial as it gets and we and many other have been at it for several years. The endpoint is pretty clear though. We will prevail.
Ha ha ha ah ahah ha. Your work aside, take a pill for that paranoia.
I remain of the opinion that none of those "language specifically package managers" have no place on Linux systems. They should use the operating systems package managers and tools.
Language specific package managers have a place on Linux systems? !!true
The most likely answer is that you're just trolling. I'll eventually stop replying when I get bored of you. I'm currently having fun with this so it doesn't matter if you're a troll or just have reading comprehension issues.
Not as much fun as I'm having. At this moment you're the laughing stock of an entire classroom, and an example of delusion. Do us all a favor and keep coming back.
-I made a spelling mistake. Big fucking deal. Doesn't affect my argument one bit (pun intended). I'm just laughing that you felt the need to devote half your reply to a spelling mistake.
You did and it is funny as fuck. Feel free to laugh at me as I laugh at you. Your mistake is indicative of your thought process, riddled with errors.
-When I read his post I took that to be a non-HDMI specific statement. Even if it wasn't you could have just wrote "The HDMI spec defines a byte as 8-bits". Yet you chose to make the statement that a byte is 8-bits everywhere and not just HDMI.
Everywhere? Period now equals everywhere, or does period equal the context of the conversation? There is no 8-bit implementation in HDMI, or any other technology, modern or otherwise. That is the core argument, and it is the dead horse with which you flail on.
-And you can't spell the word bit: "9 but machine". How can I expect logical though from you! LOL!
The word you were looking for was 'thought', as in you lack the ability to form one. You didn't accidentally drop the 't', you never learned to add one. You are representative of a failed American education and you're bitter for it, but who cares? Go share with the world your 9-bit philosophy.
You are not an opponent, you are nobody.
-Yet you seem to be compelled to reply to me. I find that funny.
So do I, as you've replied as much as I have. When two people are standing in shit, you look like an idiot, when you point out the other man's shoes.
> You fucked up by spouting off about 9 bits and you haven't been able to recover.
-You're under the mistaken impression I'm loosing this debate. You're also mistaken that my argument depends on 9-bit bytes existing.
No, I know you lost. WTF?! You can't even spell the word, how can anyone expect a logical thought from you. The word you were looking for was lose, not loose. As in you've lost, not you've loosed. You didn't mistype, it wasn't an autocorrect issue, you simply never learned how to spell the word. I'm sure I'm not the first person to correct you. You are so stupid that you're incapable of comprehending that your first post was a response to an actual implementation, and your response contained the statement that it could be an 8 or 9 bit byte. That was your fuck up, and that is what garnered my response. There is no amount of information, with which to pull from your ass, that will change this fact, but feel free to keep pulling.
Demeaning your opponents. So when you can't win with facts, you try to win with insults. It does shows me what kind of person you are however.
While 32-bit bytes might be non-existent, 16-bit bytes are not: http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/spru2... . Check out section 5.3. Here's the note from the bottom of it:
Note: C55x Byte is 16 Bits
By ISO C definition, the size of operator yields the number of bytes required
to store an object. ISO further stipulates that when sizeof is applied to char,
the result is 1. Since the C55x char is 16 bits (to make it separately address-
able), a byte is also 16 bits. This yields results you may not expect; for exam-
ple, sizeof (int) == 1 (not 2). C55x bytes and words are equivalent (16 bits).
Guess the engineers at ISO and Texas Instruments are full of crap as well.
You are not an opponent, you are nobody. The Texas Instruments engineers are bright people, who are not part of this conversation. They did not utilize 9 bit bytes, nor did anyone else for that matter. You fucked up by spouting off about 9 bits and you haven't been able to recover. You've desperately tried too, but you cant get around the fact that a 9 bit byte doesn't exist. In the future, feel free to sling your garbage as it pertains to any real byte implementation.
Since it's in international waters, the only result of this will be that the nations that signed up won't be doing any fishing while the ones that didn't will still be doing business as usual.
Signatories include the EU, and nine nations: Canada, Denmark(Greenland), Norway, Russia, United States, Japan, China, South Korea, and Iceland. That's a lot of fish that will be left alone for the next 16 years. I'd say that will make an impact.
Japan's commitment covers commercial fishing, not their 'scientific' endeavors.
Ah, the next stage of the debate where I'm called names. The pattern never fails. So I'm and asshole and an idiot. How nice.
In communications the term octet is used instead of byte. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... . The RFCs use it, the Ethernet standard uses it, etc.
Yes, you can say in the context of a discussion that bytes are 8-bits. But adding "period" to the end of your statement takes it outside that context and means that it applies everywhere in every situation.
And this context? Since the person you replied to wrote "when broadband providers get it wrong" the context also includes the internet. So if you can prove to me that every last device hooked up to the internet uses 8-bit bytes then fine. Otherwise go away.
How about I do neither. You are eight bit characters on a screen, nothing more. Your 9 bit defense was worthless and I'm happy to leave it that way. As an aside, by your logic you should have included every other non existent byte representation. A 32 bit byte is just as non existent as your 9 bits.
His example is analogous to $100 HDMI cables, and the world is full of these examples. It's easy to laugh at someone when their choice is not your choice, but the fact is the world is run by parting fools and their money.
No, but there are DSPs with 12, 14 and 16 as the smallest unit of memory.
But the fact that 9 bit machines aren't being produced is irrelevant. They existed and some might still be operational.
While 8-bit bytes are the modern de-facto standard you can't say "There are 8 bits in a byte, period." and be correct.
You certainly can in the context of this discussion. This isn't an exchange of information in a vacuum, but rather a discussion on the misuse of network traffic measurement units. Shouting 9 bit bytes is not only irrelevant, it makes you look like an asshole. What once was and what can be are constructs of an idiot who can't discern between the relevant and the esoteric.
He could stick to Linux journalism, instead of alienating some his readership. I wouldnâ(TM)t worry, I didnâ(TM)t read the article, but Iâ(TM)m sure the magazine is doing fine. In fact, Iâ(TM)m sure they could stand to run off a few readers and lighten their workload.
RTFA please before you post about it. gigaBITS, with a small "b". There's an 8 (or 9) fold difference between "Gb" and "GB". If you can't remember what the abbreviation stands for, quit using it and just spell it out properly.
(from TFA: "A bigger pipe (48 gigabits per second) allows more information for higher resolutions, ")
Pisses me off to no end when broadband providers get it wrong in their ads. "can I get that in writing?" (long hold) "actually sir what we meant to say was..."
I also cringe when the wrong unit of measure is used, however why did you specify 8 ( or 9) fold difference? There are 8 bits in a byte, period. Where did the 9 come from?
I have long thought it insane that the EV business did not start with RVs first, then big trucks and buses, then commercial vans, then SUVs, and finally cars. The torque and maintenance benefits of electric over diesel should allow it to dominate the big vehicle applications.
I always though buses would be a natural for EVs. Fixed routes and schedules that cold be tailored to an EV's charging cycle. City buses could have chargers at the depot and recharged between operations, WalMart makes sense since it's trucks would go from distribution stations to stores which allows for fixed schedules and charging stations at distribution centers or stores as needed.
Thought! Can you fucking type it? What is wrong with you, that you can't spell a simple word.
Slashdot Mirror
Iâ(TM)m confident the winner of the contract appreciates their non effort.
At least there are plenty of us who are working on unbreakable hardware primitives in silicon that will keep these bastards at bay. It's about as nontrivial as it gets and we and many other have been at it for several years. The endpoint is pretty clear though. We will prevail.
Ha ha ha ah ahah ha. Your work aside, take a pill for that paranoia.
Every now and then, politicians trot out the rotting corpse of 'entertainment media influences violence.' It's as dead now, as it was in the 80s.
I remain of the opinion that none of those "language specifically package managers" have no place on Linux systems. They should use the operating systems package managers and tools.
Language specific package managers have a place on Linux systems? !!true
The most likely answer is that you're just trolling. I'll eventually stop replying when I get bored of you. I'm currently having fun with this so it doesn't matter if you're a troll or just have reading comprehension issues.
Not as much fun as I'm having. At this moment you're the laughing stock of an entire classroom, and an example of delusion. Do us all a favor and keep coming back.
-I made a spelling mistake. Big fucking deal. Doesn't affect my argument one bit (pun intended). I'm just laughing that you felt the need to devote half your reply to a spelling mistake.
You did and it is funny as fuck. Feel free to laugh at me as I laugh at you. Your mistake is indicative of your thought process, riddled with errors.
-When I read his post I took that to be a non-HDMI specific statement. Even if it wasn't you could have just wrote "The HDMI spec defines a byte as 8-bits". Yet you chose to make the statement that a byte is 8-bits everywhere and not just HDMI.
Everywhere? Period now equals everywhere, or does period equal the context of the conversation? There is no 8-bit implementation in HDMI, or any other technology, modern or otherwise. That is the core argument, and it is the dead horse with which you flail on.
-And you can't spell the word bit: "9 but machine". How can I expect logical though from you! LOL!
The word you were looking for was 'thought', as in you lack the ability to form one. You didn't accidentally drop the 't', you never learned to add one. You are representative of a failed American education and you're bitter for it, but who cares? Go share with the world your 9-bit philosophy.
Donâ(TM)t you mean makes some popcorn?
You are not an opponent, you are nobody. -Yet you seem to be compelled to reply to me. I find that funny. So do I, as you've replied as much as I have. When two people are standing in shit, you look like an idiot, when you point out the other man's shoes. > You fucked up by spouting off about 9 bits and you haven't been able to recover. -You're under the mistaken impression I'm loosing this debate. You're also mistaken that my argument depends on 9-bit bytes existing. No, I know you lost. WTF?! You can't even spell the word, how can anyone expect a logical thought from you. The word you were looking for was lose, not loose. As in you've lost, not you've loosed. You didn't mistype, it wasn't an autocorrect issue, you simply never learned how to spell the word. I'm sure I'm not the first person to correct you. You are so stupid that you're incapable of comprehending that your first post was a response to an actual implementation, and your response contained the statement that it could be an 8 or 9 bit byte. That was your fuck up, and that is what garnered my response. There is no amount of information, with which to pull from your ass, that will change this fact, but feel free to keep pulling.
Google glitch sounds like a new product. How did it take machines offline again?
Demeaning your opponents. So when you can't win with facts, you try to win with insults. It does shows me what kind of person you are however.
While 32-bit bytes might be non-existent, 16-bit bytes are not: http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/spru2... . Check out section 5.3. Here's the note from the bottom of it:
Note: C55x Byte is 16 Bits By ISO C definition, the size of operator yields the number of bytes required to store an object. ISO further stipulates that when sizeof is applied to char, the result is 1. Since the C55x char is 16 bits (to make it separately address- able), a byte is also 16 bits. This yields results you may not expect; for exam- ple, sizeof (int) == 1 (not 2). C55x bytes and words are equivalent (16 bits).
Guess the engineers at ISO and Texas Instruments are full of crap as well.
You are not an opponent, you are nobody. The Texas Instruments engineers are bright people, who are not part of this conversation. They did not utilize 9 bit bytes, nor did anyone else for that matter. You fucked up by spouting off about 9 bits and you haven't been able to recover. You've desperately tried too, but you cant get around the fact that a 9 bit byte doesn't exist. In the future, feel free to sling your garbage as it pertains to any real byte implementation.
Good. Hopefully all nations will be complaint and this is the start of something big.
I'm complaining already, by just reading the comment.
Since it's in international waters, the only result of this will be that the nations that signed up won't be doing any fishing while the ones that didn't will still be doing business as usual.
Signatories include the EU, and nine nations: Canada, Denmark(Greenland), Norway, Russia, United States, Japan, China, South Korea, and Iceland. That's a lot of fish that will be left alone for the next 16 years. I'd say that will make an impact.
Japan's commitment covers commercial fishing, not their 'scientific' endeavors.
Ah, the next stage of the debate where I'm called names. The pattern never fails. So I'm and asshole and an idiot. How nice.
In communications the term octet is used instead of byte. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... . The RFCs use it, the Ethernet standard uses it, etc.
Yes, you can say in the context of a discussion that bytes are 8-bits. But adding "period" to the end of your statement takes it outside that context and means that it applies everywhere in every situation.
And this context? Since the person you replied to wrote "when broadband providers get it wrong" the context also includes the internet. So if you can prove to me that every last device hooked up to the internet uses 8-bit bytes then fine. Otherwise go away.
How about I do neither. You are eight bit characters on a screen, nothing more. Your 9 bit defense was worthless and I'm happy to leave it that way. As an aside, by your logic you should have included every other non existent byte representation. A 32 bit byte is just as non existent as your 9 bits.
His example is analogous to $100 HDMI cables, and the world is full of these examples. It's easy to laugh at someone when their choice is not your choice, but the fact is the world is run by parting fools and their money.
No, but there are DSPs with 12, 14 and 16 as the smallest unit of memory.
But the fact that 9 bit machines aren't being produced is irrelevant. They existed and some might still be operational.
While 8-bit bytes are the modern de-facto standard you can't say "There are 8 bits in a byte, period." and be correct.
You certainly can in the context of this discussion. This isn't an exchange of information in a vacuum, but rather a discussion on the misuse of network traffic measurement units. Shouting 9 bit bytes is not only irrelevant, it makes you look like an asshole. What once was and what can be are constructs of an idiot who can't discern between the relevant and the esoteric.
General Motors builds an amazing electric as well.
He could stick to Linux journalism, instead of alienating some his readership. I wouldnâ(TM)t worry, I didnâ(TM)t read the article, but Iâ(TM)m sure the magazine is doing fine. In fact, Iâ(TM)m sure they could stand to run off a few readers and lighten their workload.
Care to cough up an example of a modern 9 but machine?
RTFA please before you post about it. gigaBITS, with a small "b". There's an 8 (or 9) fold difference between "Gb" and "GB". If you can't remember what the abbreviation stands for, quit using it and just spell it out properly.
(from TFA: "A bigger pipe (48 gigabits per second) allows more information for higher resolutions, ")
Pisses me off to no end when broadband providers get it wrong in their ads. "can I get that in writing?" (long hold) "actually sir what we meant to say was..."
I also cringe when the wrong unit of measure is used, however why did you specify 8 ( or 9) fold difference? There are 8 bits in a byte, period. Where did the 9 come from?
I met so many people with masters degrees that had no idea how to actually turn a Windows server into a domain controller
Benefit of doubt: Were they Solaris, *BSD, or GNU/Linux admins who had never been in front of a licensed copy of Windows Server before?
You judge people because they don't know how to add a role to a Windows server? That seems like an incredibly strange data point to judge someone.
I have long thought it insane that the EV business did not start with RVs first, then big trucks and buses, then commercial vans, then SUVs, and finally cars. The torque and maintenance benefits of electric over diesel should allow it to dominate the big vehicle applications.
I always though buses would be a natural for EVs. Fixed routes and schedules that cold be tailored to an EV's charging cycle. City buses could have chargers at the depot and recharged between operations, WalMart makes sense since it's trucks would go from distribution stations to stores which allows for fixed schedules and charging stations at distribution centers or stores as needed.
Thought! Can you fucking type it? What is wrong with you, that you can't spell a simple word.
You expected sympathy and kindness on Slashdot? Shitposting is an Olympic sport here.
How did she bite the wine? Did you freeze the shit and serve it in cubes?
Dude! I love gta as well!
Sure about that?