Slashdot Mirror


Linux Journal Ceases Publication (linuxjournal.com)

Not too long after Linus Torvalds wrote his own Unix kernel, which he called Linux, in the summer of 1991, a magazine was founded by enthusiasts to focus on the operating system. For more than two decades Linux Journal has been an authority magazine on all things Linux, often cited by mainstream outlets, but it is now shuttering doors. In a blog post, Linux Journal's Carlie Fairchild writes: It looks like we're at the end, folks. If all goes according to a plan we'd rather not have, the November issue of Linux Journal was our last. The simple fact is that we've run out of money, and options along with it. We never had a wealthy corporate parent or deep pockets of our own, and that made us an anomaly among publishers, from start to finish. While we got to be good at flying close to the ground for a long time, we lost what little elevation we had in November, when the scale finally tipped irrevocably to the negative. Thanks for all the fish.

123 comments

  1. cry cry cry by no-body · · Score: 4, Insightful

    what a loss...

    1. Re:cry cry cry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll!

  2. Me sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So very sad...

  3. Welp by war4peace · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Another classical magazine succumbed to the advancement of technology it itself promoted.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    1. Re:Welp by StormReaver · · Score: 2

      Another classical magazine succumbed to the advancement of technology it itself promoted.

      Yes, it succumbed to the advancement of freely available information. While it's a shame that good people lost their jobs, the magazine offered nothing above what was already freely published. The same thing happened to Linux Magazine. Linux is one of the best documented operating systems ever made, and there is nothing that a fee-based magazine can offer to top that.

    2. Re:Welp by bettodavis · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well organized, freely available information sources about Linux technical topics killed it.

      Nowadays it's easier and cheaper to go to one of many free websites with thousands of articles and technical questions answered and indexed, than looking for a solution in an old magazine rack.

      It is sad such a thing happened for the people making a living out of it, but it's good for Linux there are so many information sources nowadays.

    3. Re:Welp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fucking miss the Perl Journal, even though I never really used Perl outside of a few scripts. It was just.. right.. to see on the newsstand.

      I'd love to see a quarterly lisp rag, though.

    4. Re:Welp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Another classical magazine succumbed to the advancement of technology it itself promoted.

      Linux Journal was "classical" in the 1990s, but they failed to really transition into anything meaningful in the new millenium.

      I remember when they sent me the notice that they were discontinuing their print edition and migrating everyone to an "online only" edition. There was maybe 1 month's advance notice of these changes. I asked for a refund of my remaining subscription fees and took my business elsewhere.

      Over the years I remember:

      * Linux Journal page counts slowly declining.

      * Shawn Powers got stranger and stranger over the years, and he admits to working for a school system somewhere in the Midwest!

      * Doc Searls got more and more political and libtard over the years. He lives or lived in Santa Barbara, CA and/or "the Northeast" as mentioned in the magazine.

      And the content simply became more and more "me too" rather than "innovative" or "interesting". By comparison, I consider the former Linux Voice magazine to be both interesting and innovative. I still find Linux Pro magazine to be worth my subscription money.

      I will not miss Linux Journal and I have not missed them since I asked for my subscription refund. May Linux Journal die quickly & quietly while fading into obscurity.

    5. Re:Welp by tezbobobo · · Score: 2

      That's not exactly true. Firstly there is peripheral information like interviews with interesting people, or project overview articles. Second, Magazines are a repository for information - you don't need to google it, it comes to you. Thirdly, magazines are edited - tested for correctness, spelling, good prose, etc. I'm sure there are more reasons, but these are the few I can list off the top of my head.

    6. Re: Welp by Monster_user · · Score: 1, Insightful

      A magazine is static content with low levels of user feedback and input on article quality and interest. The production values, and expected print form releases increase costs above most of their competitors, and now above market value.

      Blogs and other web based publishing methods have all sorts of metrics and numbers to gauge interest. Article comments even give you insight into the reaction of a publication, which maybe even lets you gauge public relations.

      So you have a high supply of low cost, high traffic sites handled by enthusiasts who are willing to work for the love of the job, and are happy with almost any peanuts or profits thrown their way. Then you've got a high cost competitor who's job is to reduce that supply to a manageable influx of interest to their demographic, and add some polish and refinement to the articles. This additional work takes time, which their target demographic will have likely already spent sorting and refining the information on their own. So the magazine publisher ends up dishing out old news, or just peddling the same content as thr enthusiasts/hobbyists at the same level of quality, but more expensive tools.

    7. Re: Welp by wellingj · · Score: 1

      Yep universal. Blogs, Vlogs, and forums have disrupted the mag biz across all spectrums. Cars, Sports, Guns, Gamers, Tech, Professionals... It's a good time to be alive if you don't work in the establishment media...

    8. Re: Welp by Monster_user · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure. It is this content distribution system which has allowed the possibility of a Russian influence USA election to have become a reality.

      Everybody is a publisher, and there is little to no verification, or publishing standards to hold a person to. Things are not vetted, they are simply shared. A significant portion of information is now essentially gossip.

      Sure there may be some established content creators, but news on a feed somewhere is not required to come from a well established content creator. All news, gossip, and creators are lumped together and given rank based on clicks rather than quality. So confusion, click bait, and conspiracy may rank higher than quality content.

      The chaos sucks to be honest. Plenty to talk about, but little to plan a future around aside from expecting mass panic and hysteria at some point, when we are forced to relearn the lesson of the "War of the Worlds" radio broadcast.

    9. Re:Welp by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Of course linux is full of libtards, go back to BSD already.

      systemd forever!!!!

    10. Re:Welp by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Another classical magazine succumbed to the advancement of technology it itself promoted.

      Yes, it succumbed to the advancement of freely available information. While it's a shame that good people lost their jobs, the magazine offered nothing above what was already freely published. The same thing happened to Linux Magazine. Linux is one of the best documented operating systems ever made, and there is nothing that a fee-based magazine can offer to top that.

      No. It offered a curation of items (obviously freely available in the wild), organized and cataloged, in addition to interview and editorials. There is information, where is everywhere, and there is knowledge (what you get and create out of raw information.)

      That is was not valuable enough for consumers to keep it going, that is a different argument. But to argue it offered nothing above what was available for free, that does not make any sense. At. All.

    11. Re: Welp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Political ideologies are just traps to control the confused and afraid.

  4. Re:Game over, Linux, game over. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are you talking about the same Minix that's embedded in each and every Intel CPU since almost the last decade or so?

    Windows is the loser OS, you have to install it. Only losers install an operating system.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  5. Too bad by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Phil Hughes started LJ and eventually gave it to Carlie Fairchild when he left for South America. I believe that Bob Young was a seed funder but I don't think the journal ever had that big a capitalization. Running a magazine about Linux in the face of the torrent of information about it on the Internet was never an easy thing. It's incredible that she was able to keep it going this long, and I wish Carlie luck in her future endeavors.

    1. Re:Too bad by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      It's quite surprising. The FreeBSD Journal has some sponsorship from the FreeBSD Foundation (though I think it's now mostly self-supporting) as a marketing tool. A bunch of the articles exist to showcase the OS and provide a tool for people in IT departments to advocate within their organisation ('look, bigger-than-us company is using it to solve this problem we have!'). I'm a bit surprised that companies like RedHat don't find enough of a value in this to be able to bankroll it. That said, perhaps Linux now has enough mindshare in corporate IT that it's not really necessary.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  6. 2017 is the year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of Linux exiting desktop publishing,

    1. Re:2017 is the year by aicra · · Score: 0

      This year we lost:

      DMOZ - http://www.dmoz.org/
      Advogato - http://advogato redirects to https://web.archive.org/web/20170715120119/http://advogato.org/ . [*Forever as a journeyer in limbo]
      (now) LinuxJournal.

    2. Re:2017 is the year by MouseR · · Score: 2

      I'm surprised it didn't fork...

    3. Re:2017 is the year by davester666 · · Score: 1

      It did. There's a giant fork stuck in it.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  7. A damn shame. by Major_Disorder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I always like Linux Journal, it wasn't dumbed down, like so many things are these days.

    --
    First law of people: People are generally stupid.
    1. Re:A damn shame. by OffTheLip · · Score: 2

      Agreed. Back in the day (Byte, Dr Dobbs, etc.) Linux Journal had its place.

    2. Re:A damn shame. by zeugma-amp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      True. I've been a subscriber for long enough to remember their (Monty) Python special issue. This is really sad that they couldn't keep it up even in an all digital format.

      --
      This is an ex-parrot!
    3. Re:A damn shame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep everything is now at the level of Digg.

    4. Re:A damn shame. by doom · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Recent issues have seemed pretty good to me. They always talk about something I hadn't heard about, and it's not like there aren't other sources of info out there...

    5. Re:A damn shame. by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      [Linux Journal] took a political turn to the left, and that's why I dropped my subscription.

      When? How? Was it a systematic editorial policy? Or an article or two that offended you?

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    6. Re:A damn shame. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Doc Searls decided to rant about the election, and since he's an editor ...

    7. Re:A damn shame. by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Doc Searls decided to rant about the election, and since he's an editor ...

      Sounds like you're much more of a snowflake than he ever was.
      What if the "political turn" had been to the *right*?
      I hope you didn't switch to Linux Magazine - after all, they let Jon "Maddog" Hall publish his coming-out story in 2012

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    8. Re:A damn shame. by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1, Funny

      Doc Searls decided to rant about the election, and since he's an editor ... [I cancelled my subscription]

      I suspect the Publisher might not have wanted to keep that ship afloat if the cost was appeasing you.

    9. Re:A damn shame. by bib1620 · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, the Monty Python issue. And that came not long after LJ criticised booth babes, then showed the MP guy at a piano, naked. Who was it that left LJ after the abuse they received because of that hypocrisy?

    10. Re:A damn shame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awww poor whittle Trumpet snowflake.

    11. Re:A damn shame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if he had made a pro-Trump rant it would have been fine, right? Such delicate snowflakes you righties are.

    12. Re:A damn shame. by Desler · · Score: 1

      How dare he express opinions you dislike. We should put him in Gitmo for such a grevious crime.

    13. Re:A damn shame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody won that election. The most likely outcome is that it will poison conservatism and salt the ground it grew on for a generation. You only need to look at the demographics. The old white right have decided to burn bright and then go dark.

    14. Re:A damn shame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was so sad when Byte packed it in. Sigh.

    15. Re: A damn shame. by CustomBuild · · Score: 1

      He could stick to Linux journalism, instead of alienating some his readership. I wouldnâ(TM)t worry, I didnâ(TM)t read the article, but Iâ(TM)m sure the magazine is doing fine. In fact, Iâ(TM)m sure they could stand to run off a few readers and lighten their workload.

    16. Re:A damn shame. by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      Doc Searls decided to rant about the election, and since he's an editor ...

      Yes, he ranted about the election, but he was not a shill for Hillary. Here's his editorial.

      TL/DR: you may agree or disagree with his editorial, but it seems to me to be a sober reflection on the electoral campaign and the result. One important point he makes early on:

      Disclosure: I'm a political independent, and not a fan of Hillary Clinton, though I thought she was the only sensible choice, given Trump's shortcomings, many of which should have disqualified him, flat out.

      Read the rest of it yourself, but for those who are curious, his piece ends with the following (bold emphasis is his):

      Here's the Linux connection: we need to hack news back in a logical direction, and away from the fact-free, misleading and emotion-stirring ways that news is made today. The mainstream media is beyond fixing. So is the newstream media, so long as it remains dependent on surveillance-based advertising, clickbait and fake news of its own.

      I don't know how we do that, but we've hacked the world before: with free software, Linux and open source, just to name the Big Three.

      Time to do it again.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    17. Re:A damn shame. by Obfuscant · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But if he had made a pro-Trump rant it would have been fine, right?

      Nope. I don't subscribe to technical journals and magazines for politics of either kind. I subscribe for the technical information. Political commentary that wastes space on the page I'm paying for is a waste either way. You might note that I didn't say which way he ranted, because it was truly irrelevant.

      If I want to waste my time reading political commentary, there's plenty of places I can get it for free, which is a bit more than the commentary is worth.

      For those of my traveling contingent who think my comment was flamebait, nope. I simply made an observation of how the magazine had drifted away from its intended purpose. If that upsets you, well, sorry. I didn't say he had no right to do that. I didn't even say he was wrong. Just inappropriate for the medium he was using.

    18. Re: A damn shame. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      This. It's pretty stupid to be running a business that isn't doing very well and then decide to take political sides on a polarizing situation, either way. Businesspeople who value the custom will go out of their way not to alienate people needlessly. Political commentary in a magazine about a computer operating system is "needlessly".

      It's especially silly when you resort to name calling and childish games with someone's name. "Internet troll"? No, sorry, he's not an internet troll. ("Twitter" isn't "the internet". Why would LJ think it was?) And the fact that the guy you didn't like won an election shouldn't be an epiphany that "news" and "internet" have had a dark side ever since the internet got hot (i.e. opened up to "the public"). That's a lot longer ago than the last election cycle.

      It's even sillier when you get a comment from an unhappy subscriber and then completely ignore it. "Maybe the problem will go away if we do nothing" makes nobody happy.

    19. Re:A damn shame. by Obfuscant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      but it seems to me to be a sober reflection on the electoral campaign and the result.

      Had he stuck to that it would have been a much closer call. It became name calling, and that was too far.

      Here's the Linux connection: we need to hack news back in a logical direction, and away from the fact-free, misleading and emotion-stirring ways that news is made today.

      This is not a "linux connection". It is much bigger than linux. It's a social issue that neither linux nor Linus can fix, and it has been going on for a lot longer than today. Just because web hosting services may be running linux servers doesn't create the linux connection. It was a problem even back when Sun was the internet. It is likely to still be an issue when the next big thing replaces linux.

      Now that we've opened the floodgates to anyone and their brother putting their "news" online, it is impossible to go back -- without authoritarian control over what gets published. Somebody will have to be in charge of deciding what is "right" and what is "fake" and stopping the "fake" from being distributed somehow. Sadly, a lot of those who think they can decide for others what that "right" stuff is tend to think opinions that don't gibe with theirs are "fake". Facebook thinks they can do it for their "news feeds", but that doesn't seem to be highly successful. Twitter is going after "Russian connected accounts", but that's not going to solve anything.

      Every game of whack-a-mole for fake news misses most of the moles, and it creates someone who thinks it is their job to whack what they don't believe. The US first amendment was based on the idea that silencing objectionable speech was not the solution; commercial censorship is based entirely on the concept that it is.

      The result will be an internet that nobody likes, and even having linux on every desktop won't make it better.

    20. Re:A damn shame. by NaCh0 · · Score: 1

      The publisher's "nonappeasement" decision was an ultimate win for conservatives.

      The liberal tripe is no longer in print and the lefties running the show are out of work.

    21. Re:A damn shame. by smugfunt · · Score: 1

      In his EOF column Doc Searls wrote:

      I began writing this column on November 9, 2016, on the balcony of a hotel in Istanbul, while a call to prayer echoed through the streets below. I took that as good advice, because a few hours earlier my country elected an Internet troll, Donald Trump, as its president (http://scripting.com/2016/07/28/dontFeedDjTrump.html). Perhaps by now we're calling this day 11/9, in the mold of 9/11. I'm an optimistic guy, but color me pessimistic about where my country is now heading, led by a world-class narcissist.
      And forgive me for obsessing not only about where this is going, but how we got here. Our country has been hacked, and that matters.
      Disclosure: I'm a political independent, and not a fan of Hillary Clinton, though I thought she was the only sensible choice, given Trump's shortcomings, many of which should have disqualified him, flat out. But he won. Why?

      This caused a shitstorm of complaining letters and cancellations. Quite astonishing to me, though perhaps it shouldn't have been after the hysterical reaction to the picture of a naked man seated at a piano on the cover of the Monty Python issue. There are some pretty weird Americans out there, and some of them run Linux.

    22. Re: A damn shame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lul. Another partisan dick sucker boys.

      It's funny you call the left snowflakes. But when somebody post an article or comment you don't like, it's all bets are off and you become the snowflakes. Weird. Pot meet kettle. You two could be good friends

    23. Re:A damn shame. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      This caused a shitstorm of complaining letters and cancellations. Quite astonishing to me,

      If you read /. on a regular basis, you might believe that computer people can do nothing but resort to name calling when an election doesn't result in their favorite as the winner. It should not be surprising that a large part of the population doesn't really want to see personal insult in everything they read and pay for.

      Cancellation was not the right action, since that just results in lost money. You've already paid for the magazine, you might as well get the issues you've paid for. And maybe, just maybe, the next issue will carry an apology. But no, sadly, it did not. For something that resulted in as serious a response as you claim, the editorial staff was amazingly silent about it. "Ignore it and it will go away" boomeranged.

      There are some pretty weird Americans out there, and some of them run Linux.

      Yes, it is emotionally satisfying to insult those who object to irrelevant political commentary in a technical journal as "weird", and that just reinforces the stereotype.

  8. That's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Because I've been using Linux since 2003 and never even heard of this magazine.

    1. Re:That's funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mom didn't have mail delivered to her basement?

  9. Re:Game over, Linux, game over. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does "embedded in each and every Intel CPU" elevate Minix to non-loser status.

  10. Dropped After Dead-Tree Printed Version Ended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I used to have a subscription (I think I had it for 6-7 years), but when they went only to an electronic only version and dropped the dead-tree, I did not renew.

    I wonder how many other people did the same thing.

    1. Re:Dropped After Dead-Tree Printed Version Ended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Still complaining about that after all of these years, huh?

      Even though I was disappointed, I stuck with the magazine and don't regret it at all. I can't say that I've seen other publications handle that type of situation, but I thought the way LJ handled it was very good. They were careful to explain the reasons behind it and were on top of subscriber feedback--positive and negative. I doubt anyone could have done better.

    2. Re:Dropped After Dead-Tree Printed Version Ended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AOL.

      (Me too!, for those too young to get the reference)

    3. Re:Dropped After Dead-Tree Printed Version Ended by crow · · Score: 1

      Yup, me too. I had jumped on a deal shortly before that where you could extend your subscription by 100 issues for $100. When they stopped mailing it, I never logged in to read it. I occasionally will find an old article when searching on some topic, and it's almost always a great source of information.

    4. Re:Dropped After Dead-Tree Printed Version Ended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "its because even though we believe there is something new to be learned, there is not, yet, wait.. a puzzle is a problem and sometimes the problem evolves.. and yet the puzzle ironically is reborn, -- yet the problem in the puzzle is just an infinite loop waiting for an interrupt to happen..and it happens, again, and again, and again" - andrew robert flagg mtncomp - peace be with you until your cmos battery dies and then don't worry about it.. it was just a dream..

    5. Re:Dropped After Dead-Tree Printed Version Ended by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dropped at the time they killed off the print edition. I started my subscription in the mid 90's and dropping print was it for me too.

  11. I got my first Linux ISO from the coverdisc by Provocateur · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Didn't have a 'fat pipe' nor a fast one either, back in the day.

    It's incredible that she was able to keep it going this long

    And sold with physical media (cd or dvd) off the stands!

    Plus all the tech articles it was filled with, that outnumbered the ads. It will be missed.

    It was a good run. Best of luck to the people who made it all work and muchas gracias.

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  12. Re:Game over, Linux, game over. by Desler · · Score: 1

    Because Minix gets on Intel chips through osmosis?

  13. Why not just downsize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the summary that says "not too long after Linus Torvalds wrote his own Unix kernel, which he called Linux, in the summer of 1991, a magazine was founded by enthusiasts to focus on the operating system" it appears the magazine began as a garage operation. Why couldn't downsizing be an option? Surely the magazine now is in much better shape, financially or organizationally, than when it was started out as an enthusiast operation.

    1. Re:Why not just downsize by kenh · · Score: 1

      Why couldn't downsizing be an option? Surely the magazine now is in much better shape, financially or organizationally, than when it was started out as an enthusiast operation.

      You imagine Linux Journal had exactly how many full-time employees when they turned out the lights? I suspect the staff numbered in the several - remember, at the end, it was essentially an advertising-supported website, little more than that...

      --
      Ken
  14. Somewhat OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget osnews. I go there every so often and I'm always pleasantly surprised it's still thriving.

    1. Re:Somewhat OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      osnews sucks it's a macfag area (you get banned for saying negative things about apple and/or os x/ios)

    2. Re:Somewhat OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this is coming from a guy trolls Cupertino to suck off Apple employees at Starbucks.

    3. Re:Somewhat OT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can tell you that you've never been to osnews, you silly sucker.

  15. Re:Game over, Linux, game over. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    actually, desktop systems are done. The future is mobile and servers in datacenters. Most datacenter hosts are linux these days.
    So really, windows is the dominant provider in a dying part of the field.

  16. Re:Game over, Linux, game over. by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    No, Unix-based operating systems with a better UI are what rule.

  17. Re:Game over, Linux, game over. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's etched directly onto the wafer.

  18. Accepting payment in fish? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 2

    No wonder they went out of business, they shouldn't have accepted payment in fish. Harder to convert to hard currency than bitcoins, too short of a shelf-life.

    1. Re:Accepting payment in fish? by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Maybe it was herring, so that they could feed Tux?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:Accepting payment in fish? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Now they will have to go back to jumping through hoops and whistling for tidbits.

  19. Re: Game over, Linux, game over. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The UX is so much better, too. Simply type âoerootâ and press enter - youâ(TM)re in!

  20. Re:Game over, Linux, game over. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess Intel is the loser then??

  21. A shout out to Linux Weekly News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember reading Linux Journal while flirting with the cute cashier at a local Tower Records. Today, Linux Journal is gone, Tower Records is gone, and that cute cashier is my friend on Facebook. At least the best element of that part of my life is still around...

    I think a lot of what Linux Journal stood for is alive and well with Linux Weekly News. Yes, it's paywalled, but quality content costs real money to make, and the paywalled articles are made free to read after about a month.

    1. Re:A shout out to Linux Weekly News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last week I wa reminiscing on all the great times about Tower Records. I rarely had enough money to buy any CDs,but liked hanging out there and looking through their record catalog (in the days before you could find things instantly on google).You'd hear a song on the radio, but only recall a few words and it could take you weeks to find it again (this was also back in the day where radio would play something other than the same 6 songs on an endless loop).

      Good times. I seriously considered what we gave up in the attainment of instant every song ever at the push of a button.

    2. Re:A shout out to Linux Weekly News by kenh · · Score: 2

      You should watch the documentary "All Things Must Pass", currently on cable - it's a great documentary by Colin Hanks about the meteoric rise, and rapid decline of Tower Records.

      --
      Ken
    3. Re:A shout out to Linux Weekly News by Herve5 · · Score: 1

      I am a subscriber to LWN, but you definitely can read it for free, only, with one week delay.
      And honestly, once you get used to reading it, you'll be considering subscribing...

      --
      Herve S.
  22. How could this happen? by gachunt · · Score: 1

    ...when this was to be the Year of Linux ?

  23. Re:Game over, Linux, game over. by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

    Because when we talk about operating systems it always seems to be about markethsare.
    Minix being in 100% of the Intel-powered computers made in nearly the last decade, it has a higher marketshare than Windows, macOS and Linux.

    --
    #DeleteFacebook
  24. They died when they stopped doing physical magazin by rkcth · · Score: 2

    I was a subscriber for many years. One day they told me my print subscription had been converted to an esubscription and I wouldn’t get a refund. I never even looked at the esubscription and never renewed it. I would probably still be a subscriber if they hadn’t done that.

  25. Re:Game over, Linux, game over. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a joke, son.

  26. Linux Journal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So sad. . .

  27. There is/was a Linux Journal.

    1. Re:TIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool story, Digg user.

  28. Intel without Windows vs. AMD with Windows by tepples · · Score: 1

    Minix being in 100% of the Intel-powered computers made in nearly the last decade, it has a higher marketshare than Windows, macOS and Linux.

    Not necessarily. If there are more Intel computers without Windows than AMD computers with Windows, then Intel Minix outnumbers Windows. Otherwise, Windows outnumbers Intel Minix, and the numbers are Ryzen.

    However, the term "Linux" encompasses a number of different kinds of systems: GNU/Linux (the environment designed to replace traditional UNIX on workstations and servers), embedded Linux (which uses uClibc and BusyBox instead of GNU), and Android. The sum of these three may very well exceed Intel Minix.

  29. Re:Game over, Linux, game over. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something like 97% of all computing systems are embedded. From this perspective, mainframes, servers, tablets, smartphones pdas and pcs are the losers. I don't know what it is now, but the #1 operating system in the world was something that every few people outside of engineering ever heard of (but all used on a daily basis).

  30. Fire sale on the CD Collections by waveclaw · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That leaves, what? Linux Format: the 400 Lbs Gorilla of Linux reading material, with a price to match, Linux Magazine and distro-focused publications like Full Circle?

    I do hope they get a chance to make a final run of the back edition PDF collection.

    Many of the columns, such as David Taylor's work the shell, are timeless and quite useful.

    There is value even the Letters to the Editors where smart or at least smart ass people suggested better or alternative ways to implement the various little projects detailed in LJ.

    I also enjoyed the Linux Kernel Mailing List (LKML) summaries and discovered Reuven Lerner's python series through the magazine.

    And there are always the Geek Guides.

    --

    "You cannot have a General Will unless you have shared experiences. You cannot be fair to people you don't know."
    1. Re:Fire sale on the CD Collections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's still lwn.net for linux news.

    2. Re:Fire sale on the CD Collections by reuven · · Score: 1

      It's heartwarming to know that people read and enjoyed my articles! Thanks for the mention.

    3. Re:Fire sale on the CD Collections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That leaves, what?

      If online is acceptable to you, lwn.net has been my goto site for many,many years now.

  31. Re:Too free. by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2

    Proof that "information wants to be free" makes great financial sense.

    If you knew the entire saying you're failing to quote. you'd understand how silly your premise is. Selling information that people want to give away is a pretty good way to go out of business. People continue to want to give away Open Source software because they feel it's much nicer than being your customer.

  32. Re:They died when they stopped doing physical maga by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was a subscriber for many years. One day they told me my print subscription had been converted to an esubscription and I wouldn’t get a refund. I never even looked at the esubscription and never renewed it. I would probably still be a subscriber if they hadn’t done that.

    THIS!.. I too was a print subscriber for many years and never renewed once they went all digital.

  33. Actually, you an Murica took a turn to the right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From extreme right
    to "Reagan was a pussy socialist" right.

    It's weird how, to us in Germany / Europe, the US is now basically "the surviving one, of the two psycho fascist Nazi states".
    (Remember: Your industry made a killing from supporting the Nazis before the war, you hired the Nazi human experiment doctors and scientists after the war, you treated Japanese like Nazis treated Jews, you did loads of human experiments, your racism is so solid that you single-handedly kept the race theories (aka "there are human races") alive, even though there is no such term in science, and last but not least, you still operate many concentration camps / gulags throughout the world. (Guantanmo Bay being one of many. The political leader of Poland stepped down when he "found out" that one was *in* Poland. It is apparently "closed" now.)
    If that isn't Nazi, then what is?

  34. Re:Game over, Linux, game over. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    No, Unix-based operating systems with a better UI are what rule.

    So, Linux? Or, well, anything running X11 as its native windowing system?

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  35. Re: Game over, Linux, game over. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GNOME have been doing their damnedest to negate that benefit for years.

  36. I had a subscription for a long time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I stopped when they went electronic only. I saw that someone else posted a similar reaction. I like holding certain reading material in my hands. I can google with the best of them for specific info, I wanted a MAGAZINE. I would have paid more to keep it.
    Sigh.

    1. Re:I had a subscription for a long time by HiThere · · Score: 2

      I also. Reading short squibs on the Internet is one thing, but reading an article is something else, particularly if I might want to be using my computer while doing so...but also if I'm not at home.

      It's too bad, but electronic media are barely tolerable, and usually unusable. And it's not like they hadn't been told that before they made their decision. Perhaps I'll someday get an e-book reader, and that might solve at least part of the problem, but tests have shown that even under optimal conditions people learn more slowly from electronic media than from books. If they've figured out why, I didn't see the results.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  37. Byte downwardsspiral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Subscribed to those same three. It was sad when Byte abandoned the hobby readers by going all Windows and commercial.

    1. Re:Byte downwardsspiral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Circuit Cellar

  38. Re: Game over, Linux, game over. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not how that works...

  39. Larger, not better. Maybe owed $10 million by raymorris · · Score: 1

    > Why couldn't downsizing be an option? Surely the magazine now is in much better shape, financially or organizationally, than when it was started out as an enthusiast operation.

    It's LARGER than when it started out. Very likely not in BETTER condition financially. If it's big and "no longer financially viable" that likely means "owes a bunch of money to suppliers", and maybe even to employees and the IRS. Having $6 in the donation plate is better financially than having $20,000 in the bank and a tax bill for $800,000.

  40. Re:Actually, you an Murica took a turn to the righ by kenh · · Score: 1

    you treated Japanese like Nazis treated Jews

    Interment camps Concentration Camps - just one difference, we kept families together. Another, we didn't send countless Japanese into gas chambers, and stripped their body of hair, gold, glasses, and any other valuable before sending their corpses to incinerators that rained down ashes on nearby cities.

    But hey, why am I explaining this to you, in Germany - I'm certain they covered all this in your German History classes.

    --
    Ken
  41. Linux just doesn't attract end users interest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux end users just are not there to support these sites. Everyone says they are for open source, but hardly anyone contributes. I can only imagine how few contribute even to a bigger project like Mint let alone small sites trying to provide news. You won't get many advertisers on sites like Linux Journal either. Really too bad, but not unexpected. Linux is all about contributions folks, you either support it or it goes away.

    1. Re:Linux just doesn't attract end users interest by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

      Contributing to FOSS projects is often futile. I tried and small projects fizzle out quickly while large projects typically suffer from delusional egomaniacs who spend more time on bashing people's comments than engaging volunteers to contribute. I offered services for quality assurance, UI design, and documentation/translation, but although those are sought after I met massive resistance just by asking what the best way to contribute is in these areas. That goes beyond the many bugzilla reports that often gain a lot of 'me too' comments and then get shot down years later without addressing at times rather fundamental issues (biggest problem still is not being able to share a Thunderbid profile across multiple systems).
      If FOSS projects want people who are not developers (!!!) to contribute they have to put in some effort and cater to that group. I do agree that some level of technical expertise is needed. I wouldn't offer services to a FOSS project that I couldn't reasonably market for a professional engagement. I do not expect consistent hand holding, but at least manage and organize contributions and be reasonable. Volunteers like myself cannot spend 60 hours a week on your one project, because we already spend 60 hours on the jobs that pay the bills. That said, if anyone is looking for help contact me and let's talk.

  42. shuttering that door by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, if the door needed shutters, they should have been fitted before they put the door up.Idiots.

  43. Elephant in the room by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody seems to be asking the obvious question. What's a "magazine" ?

  44. Re:Game over, Linux, game over. by Desler · · Score: 1

    No it’s not. It’s stored on a parition of the SPI flash used by the Quark CPU that runs Intel ME.

  45. Re:Game over, Linux, game over. by perpenso · · Score: 1

    Are you talking about the same Minix that's embedded in each and every Intel CPU since almost the last decade or so?

    That seems like a win for the microkernel over the monolithic. ;-)

  46. There was a Missed Opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They could have absorbed sections of Byte, C++ Users Journal and also some of Embedded Systems Magazine and Dr. Dobbs ... But it stayed narrowly focused also the British Linux mags are way more colorful.

  47. I blame Nicholas Petreley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I stopped my subscription when Nicholas Petreley became the editor in chief in Feb 2006:
    http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8717

    He wrote harshly worded articles of no value. His articles were bordering on fanaticism and stirred the pot of hatred ever so often:
    http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8716

    Loved it before then, and subscribed every year even when I was on a shoestring student's budget.

    1. Re:I blame Nicholas Petreley by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

      Seems like this fella Petreley is the poster child of the FOSS spokesperson. I tried to actively engage in many low and high profile open source projects. The low profile ones fizzled out before I could contribute meaningfully. The high profile projects all suffer from these megallomaniac superego waterheads pulling the strings. They think they are God, the only God. Anyone who disagrees is scum, anyone who claims that Apple or Microsoft might be on to something is digitally shunned, they spend more time on dissing people than on fixing issues reported by many. The worst of them all are the folks from Mozilla. Kudos to them that they are still around despite all the hate and anger they produce. There is also the other kind like the OpenOffice folks who are assuming that anyone new to the team knows everything. It makes joining close to impossible. Add to that the chronic level of reality loss. That Petreley guy writes about Linux superiority in 2006. Sure, Linux is a damn good OS. No surprise it runs the top 500 supercomputers in the world. No wonder that big companies like Apple and Microsoft now warm up to Linux. Nevertheless, there is a reason why I run Linux only on the Raspberry Pis for fun. Linux and the Linux desktop are far from usable in the mainstream. Too much is still reliant on manually editing files and command line interaction. It's 2017 folks, give me a GUI or go home! Although, even with a GUI things are nightmares at times. I tried so hard to make Linux or better to say Samba on Linux be the system running my local file shares, but in that regard it is as ignorant as Windows, as quirky as OS X, and as convoluted as, well, there really isn't anything that is that bad. There is no Linux superiority when usability and ease of access are as dismal today as they were in 2006. A whole decade and nothing much has changed. Why don't all the egocentric Torvalds clones of the FOSS world address that? I guess we are not worthy.
      BUT, there is a HUGE exception! The PaleMoon team is a great example how a FOSS project can engage with any type and level of contributors. Even when disagreements come up they are very courteous and lay out their reasoning. I might still disagree, but their arguments are plausible and very informative and educational. Even more importantly, they produce a product that is top shelf! I hope they write a paper on successfully running a FOSS project so that others can follow.

  48. Re: Actually, you an Murica took a turn to the rig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After? Shit, Hitler got his "seed money" from the Ford's and Bush's.

  49. Re:Game over, Linux, game over. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    I presume he is talking about macOS, iOS, and Android (and possibly ChromeOS). These add up to a pretty sizeable chunk of market share, but X11 isn't on any of them (at least, not by default and not as the primary display server).

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  50. Sad, but interesting by MoarSauce123 · · Score: 1

    Sad to see such a publication go, but it is interesting that in the FOSS world all comes down to money in the end as well. Also shows that documentation is the first thing to go in the FOSS universe, no different than in the profit oriented closed source world. So where are all these volunteers who make things happen for the better of the universe?

  51. Re:Game over, Linux, game over. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    Well he did specify with the better GUI, so that limits it somewhat.

    I also assumed he meant rules in the Linux r00ls sense, not the rather dull marketshare sense.

    And yes I am being obtuse. I think X11 is the best. I don't like OSX much, or Windows.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  52. Very sad for me, as an author/columnist by reuven · · Score: 2

    It's nice to see all of these comments.

    Here's my side of it, as a columnist since 1996: http://blog.lerner.co.il/sad-d...

    1. Re:Very sad for me, as an author/columnist by zuki · · Score: 1

      As a subscriber until the bitter end, I would like to personally thank you for all of the many great articles you wrote. They were really on point, and super-helpful.

      Your columns were one of the reason I kept my subscription....

  53. Re:Actually, you an Murica took a turn to the righ by Kalecomm · · Score: 1

    Hats off to you, Ken! I am so tired of the constant U.S. bashing by people in Europe who've had to be rescued by the U.S. from their own TWICE last century!

  54. 'Linux For You' (Open Source for You) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have "Linux For You" (renamed as Open Source For You) still published in India. That's good. http://lfymag.com/previousissue.asp?month=December&year=2017&tot=1&id=13

    Remarkably surviving for about 12 years or more.