Slashdot Mirror


Why 'Shark Tank' Investor Kevin O'Leary Refuses To Spend $2.50 On a Cup of Coffee (cnbc.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Kevin O'Leary has invested hundreds of thousands of dollars in small businesses over the course of his tenure as a star and investor on ABC's "Shark Tank." But there is one business to which he refuses to fork over his hard-earned dollars: coffee shops. "Do I pay $2.50 for a coffee? Never, never, never do I do that," O'Leary tells CNBC Make It. "That is such a waste of money for something that costs 20 cents. I never buy a frape-latte-blah-blah-blah-woof-woof-woof for $2.50." Instead, he makes it at home. "I drink coffee, one cup every morning," he explains. "It costs about 18 cents to make it, and I invest the rest." That idea -- saving small sums and investing continually -- is central to O'Leary's personal finance advice. "The truth is, there is a lot of crap you don't need," he explains.

750 comments

  1. Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The coffee shop explosion is one of the great rip-offs of our age

    1. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by dreamchaser · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not to mention that most of those coffee houses serve absolute crap for coffee and overcharge for it. Hey, at least people get cute baristas once in awhile.

    2. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's really the "convenience" explosion. You pay for the convenience of not having to fool with it. To most people it's worth it. Look at convenience stores for example. You can buy soda vastly cheaper at the grocery store but the make their living off of people not wanting to take the time when they can just stop off on their way and grab a coke. What's more important to you? Your time or your money. For a lot of people it's the former.

    3. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm a tea drinker so maybe not a fair comparison. But I can put a tea bag in a cup and pour boiling water on in far quicker that I could pull over on the journey to work, park, get out, stand in line, order, wait, pay, return to car and continue journey, even assuming I don't have to deviate to the coffee shop.

    4. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by bsDaemon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anyone who values their time or their money doesnâ(TM)t stand in line for 20+ minutes waiting to be served dirty water by a hippie. I mean, who really has time to get coffee at a coffee place in the morning? Probably not people with anywhere to be. Coffee trips are nice for a treat when Iâ(TM)m not on my way, or stopping on road trips. Weekday mornings? Not so much

    5. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by fluffernutter · · Score: 0, Troll

      The sad part is, most of the money goes to the corporation and shareholders. Very little goes to the actual person providing the service, which is where it should be.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    6. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by c6gunner · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would you stand in line? I get my coffee at a drive-through window, along with my breakfast. Saves me 20 minutes easy. Sure I could save $4 by making my own breakfast and coffee before I leave the house, but those extra 20 minutes of sleep are worth a lot more to me.

    7. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For coffee, the real difference is likely the capital cost. If you like espresso, then it costs a few hundred dollars to get a good machine. Even if you like filtered coffee (which is about the cheapest to produce) then you get a much better cup if you grind your own beans, which means buying a grinder as well as whatever you're using to make coffee, which can add up to a hundred dollars or so. In contrast, tea can be made with just a ten dollar kettle.

      Of course, this argument goes out of the window with places like Starbucks, where their entire business model revolves around making terrible coffee and then selling you syrups and creams to disguise the taste.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So, you sit in line, then. A line of cars at the window

    9. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Known+Nutter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Mod parent up. In the 10 to 15 minutes (on average!) it takes someone to pop into Starbucks, they could have done it at home much faster and far cheaper, which throws the "time or your money" argument right out the window.

      $0.89 coffee at the 7/11 when you stop for gas? Okay, sure... $5 and 20 minutes at Starbucks?

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    10. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Kohath · · Score: 0

      People like them and value them. If people felt ripped off, they would stop going. But people don't feel ripped off. You're simply disagreeing with their preference. It's like saying a jazz music concert is a ripoff — I don't like jazz, but value is subjective.

    11. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      I bought a decent espresso machine and while yes it is cheaper in the long run there is a lot more cleanup involved.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    12. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by siriuskase · · Score: 0, Troll

      That is how capitalism is supposed to work. If you think that is sad, you don't understand capitalism. As long as there are plenty of people willing to work cheap, shareholders will do continue to do whatever it is that they do that makes our country great.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    13. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by lucasnate1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I pay a coffee shop to rent their wifi and/or space in order to meet someone. That's worth the money.

    14. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by geekmux · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's really the "convenience" explosion. You pay for the convenience of not having to fool with it.

      Decades ago, they made this machine that would automatically brew a hot cup of coffee at whatever time you set the coffee alarm to, so that people could wake up to a hot cup of coffee ready and waiting for them.

      The true stupidity is listening to the Starbucks generation dealing with store lines, drive thrus, and obscene prices, claiming their way is somehow more convenient.

    15. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, way to go, sociopath

    16. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by war4peace · · Score: 1

      if you have to sit in a line for 20 minutes... it means the demand far outweighs the offer, and that there are not enough coffee shops around.
      Note: I don't drink coffee.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    17. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The drive through I usually use is so efficient the line never stops moving. From the time I pull into the line to the time I drive away is typically a minute or less. Granted, this particular location is exceptionally fast, but even a slow one never takes more than 5 minutes.

    18. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by mspohr · · Score: 2

      I make espresso each morning. It literally takes me 60 seconds to grind the beans, fill the carrier and press the shot.
      Don't see any faster or cheaper option.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    19. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Like so much today, it's marketing hype. Persuading people to pay way over the odds for something by convincing them that it's cool and trendy.

    20. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Thelasko · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The coffee shop explosion is one of the great rip-offs of our age

      At least someone makes the coffee for you. I'd argue Keurigs are a far bigger ripoff.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    21. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This kind of ignorance is staggering.

      This is hardly a rip off, whenever you pay somebody to do things for you, you wind up paying for it. The question tends to be whether their cost of providing it is lower than yours if you're only concerned with money. Or really a combination of that and whether they can do a better job of it.

      The cost of the actual food is always a small part of the whole cost.

      I generally make my own coffee because I can do it for a lot less. A huge bag of coffee that costs probably a half-dozen coffee shop drip coffees can make me coffee for at least a month or two and the taste isn't so bad.

    22. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are plenty of people who don't have the option to charge more. The whole system is rigged in favor of the employers and the employers have no particular qualms about taking advantage of the workers who have to work somewhere in order to have money for room and board. Even then, the money is often barely enough to cover those.

      Shareholders are leeches and people like you are disgusting. Taking a bit less profit so that there'd be people who could afford to buy these sorts of things would grow the economy substantially, but that's soshulizm.

      For those of us that understand capitalism, including Adam Smith, this kind of bullshit is to be avoided.

    23. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 2
      If only there was a way to order and pay for coffee and food ahead of time...

      https://www.starbucks.com/coff...
      https://www.dunkindonuts.com/e...
      http://krispykreme.com/hotligh...

      etc...

    24. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      So... you'd pay for a place to go and wait for someone while using the WiFi?

      I think I just had an idea for a business.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    25. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Known+Nutter · · Score: 1

      Those apps just increase one's propensity to needlessly spend money with those stores. If you can afford it, fine. But oftentimes, the same people with the Starbucks app on their phones are the same ones complaining about high rents and low wages.

      --
      Beware of the Leopard.
    26. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by dunkelfalke · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and coffee can also be made with just a ten dollar kettle (instant coffee). People who like tea don't use tea bags.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    27. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The coffee shop explosion is one of the great rip-offs of our age

      Yeah, because people who work in coffee shops don't spend that money on goods or services, you know the products, (either directly or indirectly), that the company paying your salary produces to gain revenue, and pay your salary.

    28. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wonder how much people just don't think about how much things cost. $2.50 is a sufficiently small amount that it's not worth keeping track of. $2.50 a couple of times a day feels psychologically like it's still in the noise. Over $1,200 per year feels a lot more, but it's not until you do the calculation that you realise how much you're spending. If at that price it still does seem worth it, great, but it might not be the best way of translating $1,200 into an improvement in your quality of living.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    29. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Like so much today, it's marketing hype. Persuading people to pay way over the odds for something by convincing them that it's cool and trendy.

      Cool and trendy 20 years ago maybe. If it was a fad, coffee shops would be closing by now. Advertising and marketing get people in the shop the first few times. They keep going or stop going based on their actual experience.

    30. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how many of those people are buying drip coffee? This kind of thing makes old people sound like morons.

      Don't get me wrong, I think that Starbucks needs better quality coffee, but let's not pretend like what they're selling is something that can be made that easily, because it can't.

    31. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

      Not really. Coffee used to be a lot cheaper at places like Dunkin Donuts. It's the rise of the "premium" coffee shop experience.

    32. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by arth1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Even if you like filtered coffee (which is about the cheapest to produce) then you get a much better cup if you grind your own beans, which means buying a grinder as well as whatever you're using to make coffee, which can add up to a hundred dollars or so. In contrast, tea can be made with just a ten dollar kettle.

      A good certified drip brewer that brews fast enough to not make the coffee bitter easily costs a couple of hundred for the cheap models.

      That said, one of the best methods of making great tasting coffee is using a kettle. It requires more attention to detail for the coffee to not turn out bad, and more work, especially cleaning, which is the main reason why it's fallen out of popularity. I don't see the average modren man making clearing skins or spending five minutes with a wire brush cleaning an S-shaped spout every morning.

    33. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I make espresso each morning. It literally takes me 60 seconds to grind the beans, fill the carrier and press the shot.
      Don't see any faster or cheaper option.

      Factor in cleaning time.

    34. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is one of the many many reasons some people remain poor

    35. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      All I need to understand is that people who have $100K to invest in stocks seem to do dramatically better in a relative sense than people who have $50 to invest.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    36. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by badzilla · · Score: 3, Informative
      People who like tea don't use tea bags

      This is outdated information; it was true 50 years ago but no longer. You can still just about buy loose tea but a trip to any supermarket will show you dozens of different brands of teabags. I am talking about regular people drinking tea in their offices not the occasionally-encountered specialist tea snob.

      --
      "Don't belong. Never join. Think for yourself. Peace." V.Stone, Microsoft Corporation
    37. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Funny

      Also you can dress like it's fucking 1875, take your shoes off, plug in your Macbook and talk loudly about some hipster scripting language, which you clearly know nothing about.

      https://imgur.com/a/WX0eo

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    38. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And chocolate. I paid $15 for a fancy chocolate covered apple one time. This is where they get people - dollar amounts small enough that you don't miss it but when you compare the cost to make the product it's exorbitantly expensive.

    39. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by gnick · · Score: 1

      ...you'd pay for a place to go and wait for someone while using the WiFi?

      That's what a lot of people go to Starbuck's for. No way do I think $4 is reasonable for a mediocre "Shaken Iced Tea Lemonade", but there's somebody I meet with once a week and it gives us a convenient place to meet and chat. We could do that just as easily at my apartment, but Starbuck's requires a lower level of intimacy and means I don't have to clean for company.

      I think I just had an idea for a business.

      Sorry, but another Opportunist beat you to it. Starbuck's isn't the only business that banks on providing space to meet.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    40. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not a coffee drinker, but my wife makes coffee with a French press and swears it's delicious. We paid $99 for the fancy one but I've been told that you can get just as good for a third of the price.

    41. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by thereitis · · Score: 2

      Yes and if only there was a way they could track you with a mobile app at the same time. Oh wait.

    42. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      How much of that $2.50 actually goes to the person doing things for you?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    43. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by green1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I just looked on amazon, you can get a coffee grinder as cheap as $6 and a coffee press as cheap as $5. This is hardly a major capital investment.

      If you like syrups and creams, those are pretty cheap too.

    44. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Sure more coffee shops = more competition = me not having to pay for Starbucks overpriced coffee

      E.g. If you're in Taipei try this chain

      http://camacafe.com/

      It's much cheaper than Starbucks, and it tastes subjectively much better. They roast and grind the beans on site too.

      "Da4 de bing1 de4 mei3shi4 ka1fei1. Bu4yao4 nai3. Bu4yao4 tang2"

      Should do the trick. As a bonus, unlike Starbucks a large iced black coffee, no sugar means stomach pains for me from Starbucks. From pretty much anywhere else I'm fine. It seems like Starbucks coffee is toxic as well as being dubious tasting and you need to add milk and sugar to it to make it drinkable. However milk and sugar means a bunch of calories.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    45. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the 10 to 15 minutes (on average!) it takes someone to pop into Starbucks
       
      I've been going to Starbucks for years and never have I spent more than 3 minutes in the store unless it's a peak hour and even then it's normally less than 10 minutes. Cite a source or admit that you're making crap up.
       
        $5 and 20 minutes at Starbucks?
       
      Even in the same post and you can't keep your numbers in line. SMDH. And I've never paid $5 at Starbucks for the same kind of 16 ounce coffee that you can get from a gas station for a buck.
       
      It sounds like you have a personal problem with the business. Just drive by and let it go. Not only are your numbers highly skewed against the place but your desire to make a mountain out of a molehill says more about you than it does them or their customers.

    46. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by green1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If it only saves you $4, then it's either an incredibly cheap breakfast, or you way over-estimate the cost it would take to make your own.

      As for saving 20 minutes, I'd question that too, because from the time my alarm clock goes off, until I walk out the door is only 30 minutes total, and that includes eating breakfast, and getting a 2 year old ready, fed, and out the door too.

      I'm pretty certain you're also underestimating the time it takes to order, get your breakfast, and eat it at the drive-through.

    47. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Convenience ? WTF man, it take 3 minutes at the most to make a normal cup of coffee at home. And when I say cup of coffee I mean that, not the piss like brown soup Americans are so fond of. So yes, Coffee Shops are the biggest scams around, even when you factor in normal Bars that offer all kinds of espressos and cappuccinos for 1$ (and this is quite a high price).

    48. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Waitaminute. I do make my own coffee instead of buying, but it takes me time. I get up at 6:10 and serve coffee to myself and wife at 6:30. In there is the initial dish washing (yeah, previous day's coffee cups and the french press need to be washed; you might say I should have done it last night, but we're still talking about the same amount of time). Then I use the freshly-cleaned french press beaker to measure out some water that goes into kettle. Burner on high, and time to grind. (And here, sometimes I have to clean the grinder, because coffee "dust" builds up in certain spots and impacts performance.) Thermometer hits 165F and I stop burner (though temp is still going up) and put the ground coffee in beaker. Thermo hits 170F and stabilizes, and now I pour into press. It should be about 6:26 now, because it's 4 minutes until I serve.

      20 minutes, 7 days a week (though it's later in the morning on the weekends).

      If I lived near enough to a coffee place, I'm sure they could serve me faster, if I were willing to actually go out and drive, instead of doing all the above in a semi-zombie state safely in my kitchen. But by the time you throw in the driving time, it'll take longer. And I'll probably wreck car because I am just not all-fucking-there at this time of day.

      But my coffee is pretty good, and the wife gets to wake up to a hug and a kiss and the smell of it freshly poured from the press.

      I'm not sure this is really all that cheap, either. It's def cheaper than buying at a coffee place, but 20 cents? No fucking way. I am spending about $30 on beans every two weeks.

    49. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those apps just increase one's propensity to needlessly spend money with those stores.
       
      Cite?
       
      We've already seen your willingness to make up lies. How about you provide some substance to your ravings?

    50. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not to mention that most of those coffee houses serve absolute crap for coffee and overcharge for it. Hey, at least people get cute baristas once in awhile.

      That's actually all a bit subjective. A lot of them typically serve a darker roast than most Americans usually go for; a dark roast is easier to produce a consistent experience for, which if coffee is your game, you want a cup to taste the same in every venue. Lighter roasts tend to vary batch to batch and are more dependent on bean quality.

      Sure, the quality is not going to match what you make in your French press at home, but it's going to be on average better quality than your average fast food place like McDonalds or Burger King.

      As for being overpriced... yeah it is, if you're going for coffee. If you're getting a take-out, you're being royally ripped off. I almost never go, because I don't want to pay that much. What you're really paying for is the experience... convenience to some degree, but you can get a cheaper cup at McDonalds or one of those other low quality food places.

      Most Starbucks have a comfortable "living-room" like atmosphere. They're trying to attract people who want to have a home-like comfort away from home on neutral turf. Somewhere where friends can meet, sip, and talk. If, like me, you're friendless, alone-in the world, etc... there is no experience to be had... it's a rip off.

      If you're June, Mum of 7 kids, wanting to escape your wretched life, you call up your buddy April, make a date on the calendar and go to starbucks where you over pay for coffee to rent a free living room to sit and talk in away from the kids.

      As for cute baristas... that's just a myth perpetuated by TV shows. They're all ugly.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    51. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by avandesande · · Score: 1

      That's a crap excuse. I spend less time making a pot of coffee than it takes to go into a Starbucks. People just don't have any common sense.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    52. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      I just looked on amazon, you can get a coffee grinder as cheap as $6

      That's probably a blade grinder, which splatters the oil all over the inside of the machine rather than leaving it with the grinds. You're better off buying pre-ground coffee than using one of those.

      and a coffee press as cheap as $5

      You probably want to pay 2-3 times that. I had a couple that were about that price and both died of thermal shock (pouring boiling water into them first thing in the morning caused the glass to break - having broken glass and boiling water explode over the kitchen is not a very fun start to the day). That said, you probably can get away with a lot less than $100 for both the grinder and the machine. The Aeropress is pretty cheap and produces very nice coffee.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    53. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's a false comparison, though...if I go to a Starbuck's (I generally don't), I get a coffee in less than a minute. Even if there's a long line it takes 5 minutes, certainly not 20. If there was really a 20 minute line I would go down a block and try a different Starbuck's ;).

    54. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Kohath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The sad part is, most of the money goes to the corporation and shareholders. Very little goes to the actual person providing the service, which is where it should be.

      False. over 80% goes to labor and costs related to operating the store. Same for almost every business.

    55. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They keep going back because they're fucking addicted. Advertising ceases to be relevant at that point, except for drawing people from one shop to a different one.

    56. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhh

      Large grocery stores in Minneapolis/St. Paul provide the grinders in the store so there is no reason to even purchase a grinder around here.

    57. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      So... you'd pay for a place to go and wait for someone while using the WiFi?

      I think I just had an idea for a business.

      Perhaps you could serve them coffee too.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    58. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's somewhat true, but before coffee shops it was corner pubs, overcharging for beer that costs pennies to make. Personally I love to get a coffee out once in awhile, but I make sure to not make it a daily habit.

    59. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Cheap grinders use spinning blades that don't give a consistent grind and go blunt fairly quickly. If you're using a filter or espresso machine, a lot of wastage happens due to all the too big bits that don't get all the coffee extracted from them. If you're using a plunger, some of the grinds will be too fine and go through the wire mesh filter into your cup. $94 spent on getting a good burr grinder that grinds consistently to the grain size you want is worth it in the long run.

    60. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And how many of those people are buying drip coffee? This kind of thing makes old people sound like morons.

      The true moronic thing here is Starbucks advertising themselves as a coffee shop when their flavored concoctions couldn't be farther from it.

      Don't get me wrong, I think that Starbucks needs better quality coffee, but let's not pretend like what they're selling is something that can be made that easily, because it can't.

      The entire point that was being made in TFS is a financial one. One that will become more obvious when the broke Starbucks generation realizes they could have invested tens of thousands of dollars over a 40-year span instead of pissing it away on a flavored sugar water addiction.

    61. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying I don't like tea? What a load of elitist crap. Pretty much the same elitist crap that brought about the coffee price explosion, actually.

    62. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Feel free to start your own business and show us how it's done if you think it's unfair.
       
      Aside from that, you're clearly missing the point of the article. The idea of only investing a couple of bucks here and there does add up to big gains. Don't think the 6-digit amount in my 401(k) magically appeared there. I certainly have never had access to that amount of cash at one time in my life. I did it by contributing a few percent of my weekly pay and skipping the extra video games/nights at the movies to make it work in my budget. I don't miss the 60 dollar games, I don't miss the Hollywood slop and I won't be scrambling when I'm in my 60s to figure out how I'm going to make ends meet without a job.
       
      I'm the Big Wall Street that your ilk cries about. I'm a stockholder and an investor. At no time did I ever put more into these funds then what it would cost for a couple to do an evening out even at the low-rent establishments. It took years but so far my (rolled over) returns are equal to about a third of my annual salary. And I really don't feel like I'm missing out when people tell me about their cable exclusive TV shows or their jaunts to see pro-sports teams take them for a couple hundred dollars a pop.

    63. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      it really depends on what you drink, if you go for a latte (breve), making it at home is a much different beast than simple drip coffee. those espresso machines are NOT cheap, and despite what you're reading in this thread, a 80 dollar mr. coffee espresso maker simply cannot produce enough pressure to properly steam milk (at least in comparison to a professional grade machine at a coffee house can do)

    64. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too rent space to meet people and willingly pay $2.85 for a cup of unremarkable coffee (since I'm at a Charbucks about 75% of the time because it's a convenient location). O'Leary seems to be talking about doing so for the purposes of getting a cup of coffee every day just for the sake of consuming the coffee and that seems ridiculous except for cases such as when traveling or if one has a TINY kitchen so there just isn't room for a coffee grinder and other paraphernalia.

    65. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by skids · · Score: 1

      Pretty much, though overpriced coffee shops are probably not the optimal example to make this point.

      You basically have three choices:

      1) DIY, and develop your skill and spend your time at becoming a good coffee brewer

      2) Buy coffee retail and develop your skill at your profession or some useful advocation

      3) Buy coffee retail and fuck around and do nothing productive at all

      (3 is fine sometimes, as recreation in moderation is in itself a productive contributor)

      If everyone chooses #1 to extremes, no diversified economy or mature industry results from that activity. For example, if everyone changed their own motor oil, there would be no income for people willing to do so in a well set up shop where they can do it more efficiently, with better environmental waste disposal, and being able to easily run some bi-monthly safety checks while they are at it.

      If everyone does #2 to extremes, the industry tends to monopolize/duopolize and become overpriced, because nobody is there to say... "$2.50 for a cup of coffee... I could make money doing it for $1.50, and I know how..." and become the competition. This especially becomes true in fields where the barrier to #1 is too high, like medical care.

      If everyone does #3 to extremes, most everyone ends up both poor and ignorant.

      In TFAs particular case, I would say unless this guy uses the act of making his own coffee as a relaxing break from a stressful work day, then the fact that a whole 10 minutes of his day is not worth the price to have his coffee delivered to him piping hot on demand means he's not nearly the titan of industry he is made out to be by the media.

    66. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The coffee shop explosion is one of the great rip-offs of our age

      Oh is it? I don't exactly see coffee shop owners driving Ferraris down the street. Coffee is priced exactly where it should be, with markup to cover the training, equipment, and rent so that *you* can get through your day without resorting to either abstinence or installing your own coffee machine at your work.

    67. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1, Informative

      It is not about brands, it is about the quality of tea that goes into teabags. Which is crap (generally tea dust, fannings if you are lucky). Hence it is just true today as it was 50 years ago.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    68. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Kohath · · Score: 1

      If addiction were the major factor people would stop going and just make coffee at home. It's cheaper, very easy, and contains the same substances.

    69. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by gnick · · Score: 1

      Am I the only /. user that has a coffee maker at work? Investing in a coffee maker isn't a huge company expense, especially if you make your employees pay for the coffee. My employer goes the extra step and pays for my coffee; caffeinating me is a good investment.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    70. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The true stupidity is listening to the Starbucks generation dealing with store lines, drive thrus, and obscene prices, claiming their way is somehow more convenient.

      For a daily cup of coffee, you're totally right. It's far easier to program the machine to make it for you. I do that myself. I rarely buy coffee shop coffee, but the convenience for me comes in when I'm away from home, feel tired, and want some coffee. Going to a shop and paying a ridiculous price is far easier than going all the way home and doing it yourself. I think many many people who say it's about convenience only buy when it's truly more convenient.

      The people that buy the coffee daily likely just "don't want to be bothered" with all that. They don't want to plan ahead, fill the coffee maker, keep beans, filters, a coffee machine, etc all on hand. They'd rather pay a high price every day to avoid that. DIY requires planning ahead. Not everyone is good at that.

      In other words, people perceive what's difficult differently. Personally I hate standing in line, paying high prices, etc for something I can do myself quicker. Not everyone is like me, and some of them are willing to pay high prices to avoid what many/most of think is "easy".

    71. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      Not to mention that most of those coffee houses serve absolute crap for coffee

      That must be an American thing. Though I have to agree the only truly bad coffee I've had at a coffee shop was at a Starbucks.

    72. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly why I put my espresso machine in storage and use a Keurig now. The cleanup sucks.

    73. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by mspohr · · Score: 3, Funny

      The 60 seconds includes cleaning the old grounds out the carrier. The cup goes in the dishwasher.
      What cleaning time?
      Do you mean using the sponge to wipe off the counter?

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    74. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      But I can put a tea bag in a cup and pour boiling water on

      At what temperature? You say you're a tea drinker but it sounds like you're comparing your tea with someone pouring instant coffee in with some boiling water and calling it a day.

      If you love the taste of tea then you would likely a) not have tea that comes in bags, and b) not pour boiling water on it and use a kettle with an adjustable end temperature setting. Mind you the same applies to coffee. The only reason to stand in line is because the quality of a well trained barista using fresh beans and good quality equipment is much better than the push button receive caffeine machines in a typical office, ... assuming you're even that fancy.

    75. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Anyone who values their time or their money doesnâ(TM)t stand in line for 20+ minutes waiting to be served dirty water by a hippie.

      Anyone who values their taste buds wouldn't consume anything prepared in any other way. Seriously what kind of coffee shops do you go to that describe the result as dirty water?

    76. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're paying for the atmosphere at coffee shops. In the best cases, a coffee shop is a warm, tastefully designed place full of people. It's a place to work, read or even chat without the distractions of home. That's what your extra $2 is going towards.

      Starbucks drive-thrus, on the other hand, are the product of pure laziness. People would rather sit in their car with their foot on the brake that go through the physical actions of making a cup of coffee. Sadly our convenience economy is built on such laziness.

    77. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you didn't mention that almost all Starbucks are full of people who make it their daytime office. It's not at all like sitting in a Bohemian coffee shop where you might overhear people discussing literature and poetry. It's not even like Cheers where you are in a bar and people chat about current events to strangers. Combine that with the recent super sweet drinks they serve and you have families using Starbucks as a daycare.

      still, they are making money and expanding.. so someone likes it

    78. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by thegarbz · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up. In the 10 to 15 minutes (on average!) it takes someone to pop into Starbucks,

      I agree with you. But you deserve a -1 offtopic mod. We're talking about coffee shops, not a Starbucks. Wait... are we talking about Starbucks? Well that would explain a lot of the hate.

    79. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I factor in warming up time. If I want an espresso at home in the morning I'd need to wake up 15min earlier.

    80. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      A good certified drip brewer that brews fast enough to not make the coffee bitter easily costs a couple of hundred for the cheap models.

      I paid $25 for mine, and the coffee tastes great. Not bitter at all. The speed depends mainly on the wattage of the heater element and the size of the holes in the bottom, neither of which requires expensive materials.

    81. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      And sit at a cramped table in uncomfortable chairs.

    82. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought I bought a fancy one at 30 EUR (I wanted a metal one instead of glass/plastics). You can by them for 5-10 EUR and they will produce the same taste.

    83. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by admin7087 · · Score: 1

      Bottled water, particularly so called "table water" (= tap water), is an even greater rip-off.

    84. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by ChrisMaple · · Score: 2

      If your living room is like the waiting room at Grand Central Terminal, then I guess Starbucks qualifies.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    85. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by thegarbz · · Score: 0

      Given that you brew coffee like some kind of barbarian I see where you're coming from. But why not compare apples to apples?

      Step out of the train, stand in line for 5min at a store, walk away 2min later with a nice latte (note: NICE latte instantly rules Starbucks out of the equation, but then we're talking about coffee shops not that abortion of a business).
      Done in 7min

      vs

      Getting up 15min earlier (because my morning routine isn't that long). Turning on machine, doing other things while I wait for the machine to reach temperature, pre-flush to warm group handle and cup, dry group handle, grind beans, discard first few seconds to clear out machine, load fresh beans, grind beans, tamp put group handle in, pour shot, discard the used puck, flush machine to clean out coffee, and clean group handle, wait a minute to warm up to steaming temperature, flush steaming wand, froth milk for a minute, pour coffee. ... shit I'm finally done. but wait... I can't leave it like this. Get wet rag, clean off frothing wand, flush machine, go to sink, wash out milk cup, and final .... FINALLY after 10min of work (excluding initial warm up time which already cost me 15min of my sleep) I may get out the door.

      No one stands in line for brewed coffee.

    86. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I noticed that most grocery stores that sells whole-bean coffee also has a grinder with different coarse settings. That would be something you can save some money on as well (unless you dislike the thought of having your coffee mixed with the previous user's choice, or suspect that the machine is extremely dirty/contaminated).

    87. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The coffee shop explosion is one of the great rip-offs of our age

      Still not as bad as bottled water when the stuff from your tap is perfectly drinkable.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    88. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We got a fancy touchscreen coffee machine at work to replace the old drip maker. We probably spend more on tech support for someone to come debug, degunk and reset the machine every couple weeks. It's supposed to be better coffee but all it does it make people line up and wait as it brews one "custom-crafted beverage" every 90 seconds...

    89. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by nwf · · Score: 1

      My employer does the same for iced tea. We have a nifty commercial brewer that makes great tea, three gallons at a time. We get pre-measured loose-leaf tea for it that is high quality. Having a 20 oz cup right now.

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    90. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah! This moron O'Leary said a thing about coffee! I bet he'd do a great job running a literal country! Because that's the kind of guy I'd have a beer with!

      (you get Trumps, Erdogans, Putins, and other retards this way)

    91. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Depends on how often you buy beans. Ground coffee starts to lose its flavour after a few days. If you're buying the coffee weekly, that's fine. If you want to buy a month's supply, then having a grinder at home will improve the quality noticeably. I typically get a couple of months worth of beans when the ones I like are discounted (the place I buy them from does 10-20% off every couple of months) and they still taste good freshly ground after they've been in the cupboard for that time. I grind the coffee at home and take a week's worth into work in an airtight container and can taste the difference by the end of the week.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    92. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      You make a good point, I'd feel very silly wearing my Gentleman's Single-use Unlubricated Monocles at home!

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    93. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I am not a coffee drinker, but my wife makes coffee with a French press and swears it's delicious. We paid $99 for the fancy one but I've been told that you can get just as good for a third of the price.

      A French press is called a cafetiere here in the UK. By far the easiest way to make decent coffee easily.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    94. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 2

      Even if you like filtered coffee (which is about the cheapest to produce) then you get a much better cup if you grind your own beans, which means buying a grinder as well as whatever you're using to make coffee, which can add up to a hundred dollars or so

      Cheap electric grinders are perfectly fine for filter coffee, a filter holder that goes on a mug or thermos can be had for $5, filters cost almost nothing, and most people have an electric kettle. I make great coffee like this, in 5 minutes.

      Don't get sucked into the trap of thinking you can only make good coffee with expensive equipment. Good quality beans trump pretty much every other factor when it comes to producing a good cup of coffee.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    95. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      If you love the taste of tea then you would likely a) not have tea that comes in bags, and b) not pour boiling water on it

      I thought tea needed proper boiling water? I am pretty sure coffee doesn't. If neither do, what the fuck is the point of a kettle? You might as well just use the hot tap in your sink.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    96. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      My workplace has every single floor outfitted with automated coffee machines that make decent faux cappuccino and the like, as well as high-quality drip coffee machines for us caffeine addicts who just want straight black strong coffee. And it's free, obviously. If they tried to make us pay for our coffee they would have a company-wide strike on their hands.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    97. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that most of those coffee houses serve absolute crap for coffee and overcharge for it. Hey, at least people get cute baristas once in awhile.

      That's actually all a bit subjective. A lot of them typically serve a darker roast than most Americans usually go for; a dark roast is easier to produce a consistent experience for, which if coffee is your game, you want a cup to taste the same in every venue. Lighter roasts tend to vary batch to batch and are more dependent on bean quality....

      Darker? Lighter? Let's not bullshit ourselves. The "frape-latte-blah-blah-blah-woof-woof-woof" generation doesn't even know what ground coffee beans taste like.

    98. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by oobayly · · Score: 1

      Nope. We have a bean-to-cup machine. Granted, it wasn't cheap (£3,100 + VAT), but it has two hoppers (so people who can't/don't drink decaf aren't left out), 8 different programs, a milk fridge (it makes latte, white coffee & cappuccino). Work pays for the coffee too (it's good quality that tastes smooth black), although a few of us take turns to clean it (the machine is an attention whore!).

      The way we look at it is that it keeps people happy, even if it is a large capital expense. The only downside was that I ended up buying my own coffee machine for home as I couldn't bear drinking instant anymore.

    99. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congrats on exploitation of third world countries and poor people who loses their land and wealth with no recourse, even with guns put to their head and sometimes triggered.

    100. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by donaldm · · Score: 1

      A good certified drip brewer that brews fast enough to not make the coffee bitter easily costs a couple of hundred for the cheap models.

      The are many ways to brew ground coffee with the cheapest and quickest ways being 1) Drip filter (you do have to pay for the one use filters) and 2) Plunger (you may get fine grounds in your cup) although deciding to go this way will depend on your taste in coffee. You can also use a coffee percolator which is relatively cheap although I personally find that the result can be bit of a hit or a miss.

      I actually purchased a Sunbeam Caff Creamer for $99 AUD ($75 USD) when it was on special and have found it to be quite good (has 15 bar pressure) in making one or two (depends on which stainless steel filter you use) cups of short black and if you use the steam frother you can make cappuccino although you do need a little practice in frothing the milk. It takes me about three to four minutes to make a cappuccino from cold and cleaning takes about 30 seconds.

      Yes, you can go ridiculous and spend money on barista and automatic coffee machines but the one I have works really well and produces a nice cappuccino which both myself and my wife like.

      As for capsule machines, I personally don't find that much of a difference between using a good instant coffee which is cheaper. Of course, other people will have a different opinion.

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    101. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever seen a nespresso machine??

    102. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      I factor in warming up time. If I want an espresso at home in the morning I'd need to wake up 15min earlier.

      Are you talking about some whizz-bang Hipster Steampunk machine or something?

      Domestic espresso machines are pretty much as quick as making a cup of instant coffee assuming you have to boil a kettle..

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    103. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      No need for all that faffing about, if you simply have patience. I use a cheap-ass filter holder ($5 at the hardware store), equally cheap-ass filters, an inexpensive electric grinder, and a perfectly ordinary kettle. I make amazing coffee like this.

      As long as you know how to pour ("attention to details", I guess), you absolutely don't need the hipster nonsense kettles with the silly spouts.

      This whole "pour-over" fetishism hipster thing is so goddamn stupid. Between the overpriced filter holders, the overpriced kettles and the insufferable "I wear a scarf and a beanie indoors" hipsters, it's a wonder any coffee gets made at all.

      It's the simplest and easiest way to make coffee, don't overcomplicate it.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    104. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only in Seattle. Sometimes you get blue hair or purple dye while figuring out the gender.

    105. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for cute baristas... that's just a myth perpetuated by TV shows. They're all ugly.

      Even the ones that would be cute tend to have 1" ear gauges and a ton of trashy tattoos, when you're young and stupid you gotta appeal to those hipster guys somehow while complaining about being unable to land a man with money and a career.

    106. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      it really depends on what you drink, if you go for a latte (breve), making it at home is a much different beast than simple drip coffee. those espresso machines are NOT cheap, and despite what you're reading in this thread, a 80 dollar mr. coffee espresso maker simply cannot produce enough pressure to properly steam milk (at least in comparison to a professional grade machine at a coffee house can do)

      Espresso doesn't have milk.

      I agree you can't make a decent cappuccino at home without some effort.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    107. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      That's probably a blade grinder, which splatters the oil all over the inside of the machine rather than leaving it with the grinds. You're better off buying pre-ground coffee than using one of those.

      Nonsense, as long as you brush the ground coffee loose before tipping it into the filter, you'll get everything in there. That's why the blade grinders come with a little brush.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    108. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much, though overpriced coffee shops are probably not the optimal example to make this point.

      You basically have three choices:

      1) DIY, and develop your skill and spend your time at becoming a good coffee brewer

      2) Buy coffee retail and develop your skill at your profession or some useful advocation

      3) Buy coffee retail and fuck around and do nothing productive at all

      (3 is fine sometimes, as recreation in moderation is in itself a productive contributor)

      If everyone chooses #1 to extremes, no diversified economy or mature industry results from that activity. For example, if everyone changed their own motor oil, there would be no income for people willing to do so in a well set up shop where they can do it more efficiently, with better environmental waste disposal, and being able to easily run some bi-monthly safety checks while they are at it.

      If everyone does #2 to extremes, the industry tends to monopolize/duopolize and become overpriced, because nobody is there to say... "$2.50 for a cup of coffee... I could make money doing it for $1.50, and I know how..." and become the competition. This especially becomes true in fields where the barrier to #1 is too high, like medical care.

      If everyone does #3 to extremes, most everyone ends up both poor and ignorant.

      In TFAs particular case, I would say unless this guy uses the act of making his own coffee as a relaxing break from a stressful work day, then the fact that a whole 10 minutes of his day is not worth the price to have his coffee delivered to him piping hot on demand means he's not nearly the titan of industry he is made out to be by the media.

      He's an OCD leach who knows that he has 1 cup of coffee/day and invests in companies producing products that, from his own description, he would never purchase.

      Looking over his Wikipedia page, he smells like a better salesman than businessman. I am very suspicious of his investment firm and wonder how much of that claimed growth was him, and how much of it was really his brother. And going back to re-reading the top paragraph (which I skipped first), I think I called it because daddy was a salesman.

      But he's also a sucker for expensive wines, which are a bigger circle-jerk than $2.50 cups of coffee. And he has thousands of them.

    109. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I've been using a blade grinder for years, and it still produces a perfectly fine filter grind, with very little size variation. People like to really overcomplicate coffee, for some silly reason.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    110. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      It's really the "convenience" explosion. You pay for the convenience of not having to fool with it.

      Decades ago, they made this machine that would automatically brew a hot cup of coffee at whatever time you set the coffee alarm to, so that people could wake up to a hot cup of coffee ready and waiting for them.

      The true stupidity is listening to the Starbucks generation dealing with store lines, drive thrus, and obscene prices, claiming their way is somehow more convenient.

      If you're talking about Goblin Teasmade, they could only produce crap coffee.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    111. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      People like them and value them. If people felt ripped off, they would stop going. But people don't feel ripped off. You're simply disagreeing with their preference. It's like saying a jazz music concert is a ripoff — I don't like jazz, but value is subjective.

      You can't reproduce a good jazz concert in your own home for a tenth of the cost.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    112. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Given that you brew coffee like some kind of barbarian I see where you're coming from. But why not compare apples to apples?

      Step out of the train, stand in line for 5min at a store, walk away 2min later with a nice latte (note: NICE latte instantly rules Starbucks out of the equation, but then we're talking about coffee shops not that abortion of a business). Done in 7min

      vs

      Getting up 15min earlier (because my morning routine isn't that long). Turning on machine, doing other things while I wait for the machine to reach temperature, pre-flush to warm group handle and cup, dry group handle, grind beans, discard first few seconds to clear out machine, load fresh beans, grind beans, tamp put group handle in, pour shot, discard the used puck, flush machine to clean out coffee, and clean group handle, wait a minute to warm up to steaming temperature, flush steaming wand, froth milk for a minute, pour coffee. ... shit I'm finally done. but wait... I can't leave it like this. Get wet rag, clean off frothing wand, flush machine, go to sink, wash out milk cup, and final .... FINALLY after 10min of work (excluding initial warm up time which already cost me 15min of my sleep) I may get out the door.

      No one stands in line for brewed coffee.

      Apples to apples? OK. Paying $3 for a cup of coffee every morning for 40 years = $43,800 vs. paying 20 cents for a cup of coffee every morning for 40 years = $2,920

      With sound investing, the time "wasted" with DIY would likely lead to retiring a year or two earlier.

      As far as my barbaric process, I don't drink coffee. I must be some kind of monster.

    113. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. Coffee used to be a lot cheaper at places like Dunkin Donuts. It's the rise of the "premium" coffee shop experience.

      And then they raised their prices once they saw what the market would actually bear after seeing everyone shelling out for Starbucks.

    114. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for cute baristas... that's just a myth perpetuated by TV shows. They're all ugly.

      Maybe where you live. Where I live, they're *all* cute.

    115. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      So... you'd pay for a place to go and wait for someone while using the WiFi?

      I think I just had an idea for a business.

      Perhaps you could serve them coffee too.

      Or you could follow the Starbucks model and serve them scalding piss flavoured with syrup to reduce the cost.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    116. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by taustin · · Score: 1

      Tea aficionados only use loose tea for the same reason that music aficionados pay thousand of dollars for speaker wire that works exactly the same as $0.29/foot lamp cord: they believe it will be better, and therefore, it will be better - for them. It's a placebo effect, but a real one.

      For normal people, of course, there's little to no difference.

      With really cheap, mass produced tea, like Lipton, there's a vaguely papery taste to the tea from the equally cheap paper used in the tea bag. Since that's what I grew up on, I like it that way. Cheap, strong, and loaded with caffeine.

    117. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most Starbucks have a comfortable "living-room" like atmosphere. They're trying to attract people who want to have a home-like comfort away from home on neutral turf. Somewhere where friends can meet, sip, and talk.

      Every Starbucks I've ever been in has been the exact opposite of this. They have hard seating, tables jam-packed together, high ceilings with exposed ductwork (making the room insanely noisy with hard reflections and no trapping), hard tile flooring (more noise reflection), and low "cozy" lighting, but with a wide-open glass wall at the front making for blinding conditions at the back of the store. Then there's the drive-thru window, which is an always-open HVAC problem that tends to affect those exposed-ductwork areas more than usual (the lack of duct insulation makes it unable to keep up with the gaping hole in the side of the building).

      Panera (or "St. Louis Bread Co." where I live) is easily a more comfortable experience in every way. Comfortable seating, areas where tables aren't so close (and others where multiple tables can be pushed together if you need to), finished ceilings with appropriate acoustic treatments, carpeted floors, and cozy lighting with either window treatments or some kind of light-baffle all make for a pleasant experience. And in locations with a drive-thru (there are a few), it's open to the kitchen area, but not the dining room, so the HVAC can be properly zoned to handle it. Plus they have edible food and drinks that aren't disgusting, burnt, stale coffee.

    118. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just looked on amazon, you can get a coffee grinder as cheap as $6 and a coffee press as cheap as $5. This is hardly a major capital investment.

      If you like syrups and creams, those are pretty cheap too.

      You neglected to mention the [exorbitant] price of coffee beans. Ground coffee is cheaper, unless you live in a municipality where diet and virility drugs are surreptitiously added to it.

    119. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by SScorpio · · Score: 2

      If you only drink black tea? Sure.

      But green tea is brewed at 165-170F. And the length of time the tea is steeped also affects the strength.

    120. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Some people would say you can reproduce it for free on your phone with a streaming music service. Is a concert more different from a playlist than a home brewed coffee is different from a frap at the coffee shop? Let's not pretend there's an objective measure.

    121. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get a coffee grinder at walmart for 15 dollars. It is adjustable, its easy to clean, dishwasher safe, and ive used it daily for over two years. Decent coffee maker can be had for about 25. Anything more then that and you are buying features that are essentially unnecessary to make a good cup of coffee.

    122. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by magarity · · Score: 1

      The coffee shop explosion is one of the great rip-offs of our age

      Our age? Coffee shops have been a booming business since the mid Renaissance. The only modern aspect is franchising.

    123. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      If only there were privacy settings and feature options that allowed you to block all that tracking. Oh wait...

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    124. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Hmm. That's bollocks, the places I buy beans from charge exactly the same for the ground coffee.

      Sure, you can get ground coffee cheaper than beans - but you can make coffee out of mud too. For the same quality coffee there's no price difference.

    125. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      ...stand in line for 5min at a store, walk away 2min later with a nice latte...No one stands in line for brewed coffee.

      Some of us just need the caffeine in less than a 500 calorie package. So while us barbarians drink our maybe 30 calorie caffeinated beverage if we add a little sugar to reduce the bitterness, you can drink your sugar swill and gain a pound a week.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    126. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ceramic conical burr grinder with French press makes for yummy coffee.

    127. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like so much today, it's marketing hype. Persuading people to pay way over the odds for something by convincing them that it's cool and trendy.

      Cool and trendy 20 years ago maybe. If it was a fad, coffee shops would be closing by now. Advertising and marketing get people in the shop the first few times. They keep going or stop going based on their actual experience.

      Give me a fucking break. I dare you to tell a regular coffee drinker they can't have their precious for the next 72 hours.

      Addiction is what keeps the masses coming back.

    128. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Cederic · · Score: 2

      How do you think people get $100k to start with though?

      Kevin's point is that he saves $2/day on coffee, which is $10k between the ages of 20 and 30. Just on coffee.

      Find another 9 things of equally trivial cost and there's the $100k right away, at the age of 30.

    129. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > It is not about brands, it is about the quality of tea that goes into teabags. Which is crap (generally tea dust, fannings if you are lucky). Hence it is just true today as it was 50 years ago.

      That's really just an American problem. The US is an agricultural superpower but Americans will tolerate all kinds of cheap crap when it comes to food and drink.

      What Americans think of as tea is stuff they slop pigs with in other countries.

      Just buy better tea (bagged or not).

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    130. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Cederic · · Score: 1

      let's not pretend like what they're selling is something that can be made that easily, because it can't

      Hmm. So when I got home from swimming this morning, pressed three buttons on a coffee machine then sat down and enjoyed my lovely hot cup of freshly ground and brewed coffee, that was hard?

      Just how fucking easy do you want it?

    131. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Cederic · · Score: 1

      NICE latte instantly rules Starbucks out of the equation

      By the time you've so heavily diluted the coffee with hot milk, Starbucks is as good as anything else.

      I actually like Starbucks latte.

      Getting up 15min earlier (because my morning routine isn't that long). Turning on machine, doing other things while I wait for the machine to reach temperature, pre-flush to warm group handle and cup, dry group handle, grind beans, discard first few seconds to clear out machine, load fresh beans, grind beans, tamp put group handle in, pour shot, discard the used puck, flush machine to clean out coffee, and clean group handle, wait a minute to warm up to steaming temperature, flush steaming wand, froth milk for a minute, pour coffee. ... shit I'm finally done. but wait... I can't leave it like this. Get wet rag, clean off frothing wand, flush machine, go to sink, wash out milk cup, and final .... FINALLY after 10min of work (excluding initial warm up time which already cost me 15min of my sleep)

      Hmm. I walk up to my machine, press a button and coffee appears. Freshly ground, freshly drip brewed through a nice press.

      Sure, I occasionally have to empty the used grinds, empty the drip tray and fill the water tanks. Those are 40 second tasks each, so my worse case is around two minutes plus brewing time.

      Still better than your 7 minutes at a coffee shop and rather cheaper (capital cost of the machine excluded).

    132. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I look for tea with low/no pesticides and low lead content. Tea naturally loves to absorb lead. Then I focus on the bags. I've been buying Stash, which uses no chemicals to process their tea bags. For many of their tea lines, their tea bags on have cotton and/or cellulose from woodfiber. They tie the bags closed to cut down on using staples.

      I am not trying to say Stash is the best in anyway, but they seem to have taken the time to look into the small details in a non-gimmicky way. One thing I don't like about them is how they individually foil the tea bags. I feel it's a waste unless you slowly use you tea and don't want it to go stale.

    133. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Addiction is what keeps the masses coming back.

      Nope. Addiction might be what keeps them drinking coffee, but the whole point of this story is that coffee can easily be brewed at home for 1/10th the cost. If it was addiction, that's what people would do.

      People actually value what they buy at coffee shops. It's neither a fad, nor marketing, nor addiction. People go to coffee shops because they like to.

    134. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use a DeLonghi Magnifica automatic espresso machine for my coffee. It wasn't cheap, but amortized over the thousands of espressos I have made I would bet it comes out pretty cheaply for each one in the end. Maintenance and clean-up is pretty much negligible. 10/10, would recommend, actually on my second one (the first one started leaking after ~10 years, gave it to a friend who didn't care, still going strong...)

      http://www.delonghi.com/en-us/products/coffee-and-espresso/coffee-makers/automatic-coffee-makers/magnifica-esam-3300-0132213012

    135. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Cederic · · Score: 1

      My big coffee expense is in the office. I treat it as a cost of employment. Sure, it's costing me $2k/year but it's enabling me to earn substantially more than that.

    136. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > The whole system is rigged in favor of the employers

      As it should be. They are the ones doing the real "heavy lifting" in capitalism. You want lazy slobs that won't job hunt past a few big brand names to reap all the rewards of starting and running a business? That's assinine.

      They take no real risks and don't have to run anything. They just punch a clock and trade their labor. Nice and safe and easy.

      The part you're glossing over is that ANYONE can be the employer. However this requires some balls. You have to be willing to take the risk of being a business owner.

      You trade a certain degree of certainty and safety for your caged cubicle dwelling existence. That's why your boss gets (and deserves) a bigger piece of the action.

      If you want better, hang out your own shingle.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    137. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm getting a stainless steel double walled vacuum french press. About $35 on Amazon.

    138. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's $850, actually. Per year. Find half a dozen things like that and you're up to about $5k/year. With no appreciation, that gets you to $100k in 20 years. With a 10% annual rate of return, it's closer to 10 years. You'll hit $1 million in 32 years. Nothing is guaranteed, but investing just $15 a day gives you a reasonable shot at becoming a (pre-tax) millionaire in 40 years. Granted, it's a lot easier to cut out a few dollars here and there when you aren't perpetually in debt. Having a big enough safety net to be able to absorb unexpected expenses without borrowing is the key. But you can use the $850/year for that too.

    139. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Well yeah, there is a life that happens there. People need things to live. You can't just assume all of this is free and clear money.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    140. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      U.S. Northeasterner here (who has had direct experience with The Coffee Connection from way back before it turned into Starbucks), Dunkin Donuts coffee is much better.

      The Coffee Wars, begun they have...

      (lol, captcha: honest)

    141. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree that take-out Starbucks (let alone one of the trendier places') coffee is a ripoff, but at least it's usually the same everywhere (helpful when on the road). There's often little alternative other than McDonalds (which has surprisingly good coffee in recent years, though still a little inconsistent); most fast-food places have coffee that's best used as paint stripper. Even at Starbucks, though, you have to be careful - Pikes is often nearly swill, but you can ask for dark if you want to (you may have to wait for a pour-over other than at peak morning times).

      I also make my own. Put it in a Starbucks travel cup (a present at some point, don't remember when) and take it with me for the first leg of long drives. Bonus: if you provide your own cup for a refill, S will take a dime off the price. Not sure about the 18c claim, but the cost is certainly way below (near an order of magnitude?) what the coffee places charge.

      As for the "living room" aspect - you must be thinking of the little corner that S has in most stores. A couple of comfy lounges. But most of the place is cheap chairs and table - not comfortable, but a place to set up the laptop and work, or have a meeting (if you can hear each other; most S I've been in have been quite noisy, and also cold with overachiever a/c). Most of them are more like a well-populated coffee room at work.

      Also, beware Starbucks in a store/hotel or at the airport. They charge more, sometimes much more, than the already-excessive "standard" price and provide few or no amenities. Of course, at the airport, you may have no alternative.

    142. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Well I have been doing the same thing since I have been 21. And despite giving the most I can give, and having a financial advisor telling me I'm doing well I question whether i will have enough left to retire on. I don't go to concerts, I don't buy video games, buy coffee at the coffee shop maybe once every couple months. Heck half of my coffee is not only made at home but preheated from the previous day. Maybe there's something I should be doing that I am not but I honestly have no idea what that is.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    143. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by eth1 · · Score: 1

      Why would you stand in line? I get my coffee at a drive-through window, along with my breakfast. Saves me 20 minutes easy. Sure I could save $4 by making my own breakfast and coffee before I leave the house, but those extra 20 minutes of sleep are worth a lot more to me.

      What are you doing? Standing there watching the machine brew? I start my coffee first thing after I get up (takes less than a minute, including grinding beans), then toss it in a travel mug right before I walk out the door. It's better coffee, cheaper, and unless you're using a manual press, faster, too.

    144. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Well right now that money would probably be going towards paying my mortgage down faster..

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    145. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by eth1 · · Score: 1

      My big coffee expense is in the office. I treat it as a cost of employment. Sure, it's costing me $2k/year but it's enabling me to earn substantially more than that.

      Yeah... it's always hilarious to me when companies decide that providing cheap, legal performance-enhancing drugs to their employees all day is somehow a bad idea... :P

    146. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's say he would charge you $120/hr for his services (I'm guessing that's really low). That means if he spends one minute 15 seconds making his coffee then it is costing him $2.50 in time alone. He needs to learn something about finances.

    147. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by eth1 · · Score: 1

      I wonder how much people just don't think about how much things cost. $2.50 is a sufficiently small amount that it's not worth keeping track of. $2.50 a couple of times a day feels psychologically like it's still in the noise. Over $1,200 per year feels a lot more, but it's not until you do the calculation that you realise how much you're spending. If at that price it still does seem worth it, great, but it might not be the best way of translating $1,200 into an improvement in your quality of living.

      If you have someone that doesn't track their spending, and want to give them a heart attack, get them to track everything in Quicken or similar for a few months, then run some reports. I do that as a matter of course (the tracking bit, not the giving heart attacks...), and still end up with a few WTF moments every now and then.

    148. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how many of those people are buying drip coffee? This kind of thing makes old people sound like morons.

      This kind of thing makes food snobs (or any other kind of snobs, really) sound like morons. How do you think Starbucks makes coffee? Let me answer that for you: the same fucking way as everyone else.. They heat up water and they soak coffee grounds in it until the water turns brown.

      But you just go on believing the emperor's clothes are just beautiful.

    149. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Graydyn+Young · · Score: 2

      Plus at Starbucks you have to talk to a human. Unpleasant start to a day.

    150. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Melitta cone & filter on top of a cup. They're a little hard to find these days, but a #4 plastic one shouldn't cost more than $10 or so even at a ripoff place. Filters maybe $2.50 for a pack of 40 at WinCo. Grind your beans ($6-8/lb. in bulk at most supermarkets) or get pre-ground (I like Seattle's Best) that's ground finely enough for filter use. #4 cone & filter, with hot water (from a cheap Walmart Hot Shot in about a minute or microwaved in 3-4), makes 14-15 oz of good coffee in about 5-6 minutes from when you walk into the room and start grabbing things. Quick cleanup - dump the filter (coffee grounds can go to compost), and put the cone in the dishwasher or otherwise dump in the dishes to be done. Capital cost (cone & Hot Shot & a 2-cup Pyrex) is maybe $25. Extra for grinder if you want to grind your own. Operating cost - tiny. I think I can see where the 18c/cup cost estimate comes from, even with decent pre-ground coffee (keep it in the freezer to stay fresh).

      No big French Press production needed. No need to fire up (and later clean up) a big filter machine or espresso machine for one cup. Stores with your mugs in the cupboard. Why are the cones so hard to find these days? (Yes, I know the answer, and it's one word: Profit.) And if you're wondering, when you go to Starbucks and they don't have fresh coffee and offer a "pourover" the cone-filter arrangement is exactly what they do.

    151. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "All I need to understand is that people who have $100K to invest in stocks seem to do dramatically better in a relative sense than people who have $50 to invest."

      Having more money to invest opens access to better investment consultants and investment opportunities. Many of the more aggressive funds (you could debate whether they are really "better" than an indexed fund) have $100000 per fund minimum point of entry. You're going to get a lot more personalized attention from higher tier advisors if you're investing $1M+. 5% of $1000 = less than a year's bank surcharges; 5% of $1000000 = someone's middle class wages. Rich get richer...

    152. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Solandri · · Score: 1

      Sure I could save $4 by making my own breakfast and coffee before I leave the house, but those extra 20 minutes of sleep are worth a lot more to me.

      If you're making $10/hr, it took you 24 minutes of work to earn that $4. So you're actually losing 4 minutes out of this deal. i.e. If you paid $4 for breakfast every morning so you could save time and sleep in 20 minutes, in order to have the same amount of money in your bank account at the end of the year (all other things being equal) you'd have to work 24 minutes more each day. Resulting in a net loss of 4 minutes free time each day.

      That's really the point here - your time isn't valued by how much that sleep is worth to you. It's valued by how much time you have to spend working to earn your rmoney. If you're a millionaire investor then $2.50 for a cup of coffee is trivial and won't affect your finances in any appreciable way. It's just that people who got rich by being miserly tend to remain miserly even after they've become rich. But if you're making minimum wage or close to it (with hopes of becoming a millionaire investor in the future), no way in hell does that $2.50 cup of coffee make sense.

    153. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by arth1 · · Score: 1

      As long as you know how to pour ("attention to details", I guess), you absolutely don't need the hipster nonsense kettles with the silly spouts.

      A several hundred year old design with a spout that prevents ground and sludge from being poured with the coffee is hardly hipster nonsense...

      Using filers inside a kettle, on the other hand, borders on hipsterism. How ... special.

    154. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      Also, beware Starbucks in a store/hotel or at the airport. They charge more, sometimes much more, than the already-excessive "standard" price and provide few or no amenities. Of course, at the airport, you may have no alternative.

      They're also counting on a bunch of business travelers who will be expensing their brew and getting their money back.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    155. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But ... but ... but, the service value is $0.28 ... what a cup-O-Joe costs you to make yourself. The extra $4 is the social experience created by the Starbuck business. Thus barista low pay. Kinda like musicians living an environs pimped and furnished by music companies. Their music is worth busking-wages ... $0.25/tune, but the drug/bling/sex/emotocent runic we-tuney studio-created atmosphere ( or ADF ) goes for $100/ticket and $20/press. All fake ? What you feel is what you get sez post-mod dik-dykes.

    156. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      If your living room is like the waiting room at Grand Central Terminal, then I guess Starbucks qualifies.

      Well... I have been trying to divert the subway terminal to my bathroom instead of my living room, but we can't all live the high life.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    157. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Through my entire adult life property has been easily the best investment for $100k.

    158. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by fluffernutter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      7-Eleven takes risk? Macdonalds takes risk? Really? Maybe one day a long time ago when they got in at the right time, but there is really no risk in most large corps today. You have an executive that is an employee just like the person working at the desk. Furthermore, people watch them get golden parachutes over and over again, even when they fail. That's a funny kind of risk. Most risk happens in small businesses, and most of those barely scrape by and don't ever reap the rewards you speak of.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    159. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Solandri · · Score: 1

      It's "convenient" in that they don't have to deal with prepping the machine the night before, and cleaning it and your cup out after it's done brewing. i.e. "I don't wanna do the work" convenient, not "this is faster/more efficient" convenient. Same reason people litter, buy microwavable dinners, or pay an investment manager.

      If you occasionally drink coffee, like a few times a month, then Starbucks could make economic sense. You don't drink it enough to make purchasing and maintaining a home coffeemaker worthwhile (i.e. it's likely to break down before it's paid for itself in money saved not going to Starbucks). But if you drink it every day, then yeah making it yourself is cheaper, more convenient, and more efficient. It just involves a little more labor on your behalf.

    160. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by outlander · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree that McD's coffee has improved markedly in recent years. It's nice to be able to stop and grab what is at least a drinkable coffee without going miles off the throughway late at night. Dunkin' Donuts, however....that stuff is an elixir. The SO and yt drove from northern ME to SC fueled on DD coffee and the occasional burger.

      --
      "Truth is what works" -- William James "It works!!" -- o-dark-AM comment
    161. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      We're possibly talking about different things. I'm talking about the kettles (both electric and not) that are used by hipster douchebags to pour hot water over coffee in a filter in a holder perched on top of a mug, so-called "pour over coffee".

      You must be talking about old-fashioned kettles where you mix the ground coffee directly with the water and let it sit, like a tea pot and loose-leaf tea, where the design of the kettle keeps most of the grounds from pouring out.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    162. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by outlander · · Score: 1

      Where I work, we've a wonderful selection of teas, including several excellent brands from the UK. Perfectly good tea, albeit tea made with crap Valley water.

      --
      "Truth is what works" -- William James "It works!!" -- o-dark-AM comment
    163. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have one of those magical machines that automatically brew hot coffee at whatever time I set the coffee alarm.

      But I don't use the alarm. First it requires getting the coffee maker ready the night before, so all you've done is trade time in the evening for time in the morning. Second you go to bed worrying "what if there's a power outage in the middle of the night". It happens (rarely) and the coffee alarm resets to a blinking 12 when that happens. Third, instead of loading the coffee machine with fresh grounds from the sealed jar and fresh water from the water filter just before you hit the brew button, you let the water and grounds sit stale, trapped in a high moisture environment the night before. For all I know that leads to a better brew, but I can't get past the idea that I'm setting myself up for an off taste from hidden corner of mold in the machine. Honestly, a coffee maker with a delay brew timer is a waste of money.

      So now that making the coffee fresh, in the morning is the only option. Picking it up somewhere on the road is a much more convenient plan B. I'd switch to K-cups (or what ever) but it's hard to fill a thermos with coffee in the morning that way.

    164. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >If, like me, you're friendless, alone-in the world, etc... there is no experience to be had... it's a rip off.

      That's the time to go and make friends. It seriously can work. Or just people watch, ponder life without being trapped at home.

    165. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by arth1 · · Score: 1

      What cleaning time?

      You apparently don't clean and scrub the strainer, the spout, the clamping mechanism or anything else? I sincerely hope that you only use it for personal use then, and never ever serve guests.

    166. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by outlander · · Score: 1

      This ^^

      After too many failed drip coffee makers, we quit buying them and bought a reasonably good metal-bodied one from a good cooking store, and it's worked well for a long time. The welds were not great (it's hollow-wall to keep things warmer), but some non-lead solder applied to weld pinholes after baking out the water has fixed that entirely. That and the electric kettle go in the car on driving vacations....it's pretty wonderful to be able to plug in the inverter, plug in the kettle, load up the FP, and voila, coffee!

      --
      "Truth is what works" -- William James "It works!!" -- o-dark-AM comment
    167. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

      pedantic little shit.

      espresso machines typically have a wand for steaming milk.

    168. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      I remember the scene in In Time, when Justin Timberlake's character is waiting in line to buy a cup of coffee. He has less than 24 hours to live, and he is about to spend 2 minutes of his "time" to buy a cup of coffee. I did some quick mental math, and was thinking that if he just skipped the coffee, and a few other stupid expenditures, then he would have plenty of "time" to spare and his life would not be a constant crisis. Then he gets to the front of the line, and discovers that the price has gone up to 4 minutes. He and his friend bitch about how they are being exploited, and then BUY THE COFFEE ANYWAY. I think the moral of this scene was supposed to be about how the rich exploit the poor, but I think it was really "idiots will be idiots". A few scenes later his mother dies and what he had spent on the coffee would have saved her.

      Disclaimer: I am a tea drinker: 100 teabags for $4.

    169. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He doesn't work 24 hours a day. Even if the coffee takes five minutes to make, he's putting unpaid time into a ritual he seems to enjoy.

    170. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still getting my Starbucks though. I hate making coffee.

    171. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Which is crap (generally tea dust, fannings if you are lucky).

      The dust and fannings come from the exact same tea leaves as the larger pieces, and don't taste any different. They will pass through a metal infuser, but work fine in teabags. In a blind taste test I seriously doubt if you could tell the difference.

    172. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by iTrawl · · Score: 1

      Err... could I have a bullet point of your routine for reference? Sounds like you do a hell of a lot in 30 minutes and I'd like to see if I could do it. How much evening-before prep is there and how long does that take?

      Right now it takes me an hour to get out the door and I don't even have kids, eat breakfast or drink coffee, so I'm definitely doing lots of things wrong.

      --
      "Everybody's naked underneath" -- The Doctor
    173. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your concern.
      I empty out the old grounds and rinse the strainer and spout with water which cleans off any stray grounds. This only takes a few seconds. I never use soap which contaminates the flavor of the coffee. I never worry about bacteria because the hot water sterilizes everything every time I use it.

        Say, can I have some of your purple berries?
      Yes, I've been eating them for six or seven weeks now
      Haven't got sick once
      Probably keep us both alive
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    174. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      False. over 80% goes to labor and costs related to operating the store

      The "costs related to operating the store" might be 79%.

      Same for almost every business.

      When you lump nearly all liabilities together together that is true. Being honest about the claim "Very little goes to the actual person providing the service", the outcome is quite different. I ran a pizza restaurant and the breakdown was only 12-18% labor. Profit (owner's paycheck really) was great at 11%, the rest were expenses and the ample franchise fee.

    175. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

      The best convenience coffee (at home) for a reasonable price ($70 - $120) are Bunn Velocity Brew machines - or similar. The coffee makers have a tank that keeps the water at ~240'F. When a 10-12 cup pot is brewed the water comes out in a constant temperature stream, and is done in 3 minutes.

    176. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then leave something in the tip jar.

      P.S. - Margin is nowhere as high as you think, and certainly not high enough to justify your comment. The hipsters working there get paid plenty as a percentage of gross revenue.

    177. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will not find a decent burr grinder for $6. A blender like system that uses knives to chop up the beans might cost that much, but the uniformity of the grind is terrible.

    178. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by doctorvo · · Score: 1

      They don't charge for coffee, they charge for location.

    179. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, the quality is not going to match what you make in your French press at home

      Watch yer language bub! That's a FREEDOM press to you!!

    180. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by doctorvo · · Score: 1

      That is how capitalism is supposed to work.

      That's neither how capitalism is supposed to work, nor is it how it works. Profit is a few percent on average: that's what corporations and shareholders actually get.

    181. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: I am a tea drinker: 100 teabags for $4.

      Not at a tea house. Coffee is cheap at home too.
      FWIW, I'm not a gourmet about coffee, but I don't like french roast at all, considering it only slightly superior to italian roast. I prefer coffee that I don't need to add something to to make it vaguely drinkable. (So also no long term sitting on a burner.) Fortunately there are now (since around the 1980s) some decent instant coffees. They aren't great, but as I said I'm not a gourmet.

      That said, if a place doesn't offer a reasonable place to sit down and read, I don't want to pay their prices for coffee. Most places I go do offer this, but none of them are chains. Also none of them "feature" piped entertainment of any sort, including muzak. It comes in and I go out.

      So I disagree with his analysis. He's just not properly pricing a decent place to sit yourself. You aren't paying for the coffee, that's just the nominal fee bearing part of the package. (But why anyone would pay for most StarBucks places I have no idea. Even in a strange town I prefer to look elsewhere.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    182. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Starbucks is way quieter than my living room but i cant stand the charcoal they serve as coffee.

    183. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by doctorvo · · Score: 1

      Shareholders are leeches and people like you are disgusting. Taking a bit less profit so that there'd be people who could afford to buy these sorts of things would grow the economy substantially

      Average profit margins for corporations are about 7%; part of these are used for new investments, and the rest that actually provides a return to shareholders is taxed by federal and state government again. Investors are lucky to get a few percent profit on their investment. Lower that any further and it's not worth investing at all anymore, at which point you also don't get any jobs anymore.

      but that's soshulizm.

      No, it's not. It becomes socialism when ignorant people like you take over the government and turn the country into Venezuela.

    184. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by doctorvo · · Score: 1

      I can't tell whether you are a bad advocate for free markets or merely a leftist agent provocateur. Either way: knock it off.

    185. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by FrankHaynes · · Score: 1

      A French press is indeed the best for numerous reasons. The entire batch of coffee brews for the same duration, unlike drip. The filter allows juuuuuuuuust enough particulates through to impart a body to the coffee that you don't get when it's filtered to within an inch of its life--it does make a difference. It's a breeze to clean once you get the hang of it.

      If you want a good cup of coffee a French press can't be beat.

      --
      slashdot: A failed experiment.
    186. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      I can and I have. And no, they are not the same tea leaves. Better tea grades use mostly just the tips of the smallest leaves that are harvested at a different time than the larger leaves that are used for fannings.

      But even if they are actually from the same harvest they still taste quite differently. The easiest way to check is to get a gyokuro and a konacha from the same batch - konacha is the dust that was left after processing gyokuro. They most certainly don't taste the same.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    187. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For $2.50 a cup that's cheap office space.

    188. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by doctorvo · · Score: 1

      All I need to understand is that people who have $100K to invest in stocks seem to do dramatically better in a relative sense than people who have $50 to invest.

      In what way? They both get the same return on their investment: around 7% on average.

      If you start saving $200/month in your 20's, you'll have $100000 to invest in your 40's.

    189. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by hey! · · Score: 1

      Coffee shops go back to the late 1400s, and then as now a big part of what you're paying for isn't coffee; it's a place to go. Sometimes you need a change of scenery; or neutral ground on which to meet someone.

      Anyone who swills coffee all day would find it cheaper to make his own rather than to pay someone else to do it. That's always been true; the economics of coffee houses have never made sense on a coffee-only basis. The unwritten and universally understood rule of the coffee house is your "overpriced" coffee also buys you the right to hang around for what would be an unreasonable amount of time in any other kind of establishment.

      Of course a lot of people today who *do* dash in to grab a cup off coffee and go. They're subsidizing the people who are banging out the next chapter of their novel, meeting so she can decide whether he's too creepy to go on a real date with, plotting revolutions, or maybe even honing their VC pitch. That's why Starbucks plays music. *They* know you don't hear it after 30 seconds; it's there to mask conversations so they don't carry.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    190. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by narcc · · Score: 2

      It's a placebo effect, but a real one.

      I'm trying to work out what a fake placebo effect would be. Maybe we'd need a placebo placebo? I have no idea how that would work either.

    191. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me your address and I will send you some of God's own tea from Gods own county, free of charge. It's called Yorkshire Gold. If you are in the USA you probably can't get it, as Yorkshire folk couldn't abide the waste of the Boston Tea Party and stopped shipping it. OK, not strictly true, as it's a Johnny scones lately at 1886. Family-owned business.

    192. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Patented by an Italian, popularised by the Danes.

      For $99 I'd expect it to be able to whistle at least five national anthems forwards and backwards, as well as make coffee. Even my dual wall one cost a fraction of that.

    193. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by green1 · · Score: 1

      The only "evening prep" is that I shower at night instead of in the morning (I sleep so much better when I'm clean!), so if you shower in the morning you'll probably have to add about 10 minutes or so. Sometimes I lay out clothes the night before, but that's somewhat hit-or-miss.

      But basically:
      - Alarm goes off, simultaneously the light on a timer comes on in my daughter's room.
      - Go to the washroom
      - Come out of the washroom to see a smiling 2 year old staring up at me at the door (priceless!)
      - Help my daughter use the potty (She can almost do this herself now, but not quite)
      - Tell my daughter to pick out her clothes, and get myself dressed while she's doing so.
      - Correct my daughter's clothing choices, argue which one of us is right, usually give up and let her wear what she wanted the first time, help her get dressed.
      - Eat breakfast while making lunch to take to work
      - While my daughter continues to eat her breakfast I go back upstairs and shave and brush my hair (she's a lot slower to eat breakfast than I am)
      - Convince my daughter that it's not time to play with her toys in the basement, and that we need to leave (usually get out of this without a temper-tantrum)
      - Get my coat and boots on while she picks her coat and boots (tell her that it's too cold out for the one she invariably picks)
      - Argue about which one of us will put her jacket on her, watch her being unable to do so, finally be allowed to help.
      - Walk out the door, try to convince her to walk to the car, give up and pick her up and carry her.

      Now my meals tend to be fairly simple, I usually just go with cereal or eggs and toast, leaving fancier breakfasts for the weekend, Lunch likewise tends to be some form of sandwich, usually meat, cheese, lettuce, onions, mayo (though occasionally I'll bring leftovers from a previous supper).

    194. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some reason it is bad for shareholders to make money?
      as always many complain but those who really care start their own coffee house and can choose to pay students $30/hr to make coffee or actually make some money for all the risk and effort and investment. The reason they are making money is that they put up the money to make that store and all the equipment appear there and some guy turns up to work whines that he does not get paid enough and calls in sick cause he got a hang over. Oh wait he deserves the mother load of the money for sure!

    195. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by mileshigh · · Score: 1

      OP also fails to mention that to save some part of those 20 minutes s/he is likely driving while eating & drinking. Great move! ...or bringing brekkie to work and stealing their employer's time to eat it. Yeah, f@#k da man!

      Really, is this a way to live? If that short on sleep, turning off whatever device & going to bed earlier might be the saner strategy.

    196. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by taustin · · Score: 1

      It's easy to see a placebo effect when there's nothing there at all. You give someone a sugar pill, and they get over the disease they had anyway (though natural healing), and (because you want there to be an effect), you see the placebo effect as being responsible. Human brains aren't wired to grasp random events very well.

      There's also an anti-placebo (no "nocebo") effect.

    197. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Xenx · · Score: 1

      You cannot directly value your personal time the same as your work time. It matters to some extent, but you only have 24hrs in a day. 8hrs work and 8hrs sleep (just simplifying, 7-9 recommended and everyone is different) leaves 8 hours to eat, shower, commute, school, kids, whatever else goes on in your life. I wouldn't be surprised if they were able to just go to bed 20min earlier to get that 20min of sleep. However, I'm not them and I'm not going to tell someone how to prioritize their life. As long as they're informed in their actions, then it's no longer a waste.

    198. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by nwaack · · Score: 1

      Sure, the quality is not going to match what you make in your French press at home, but it's going to be on average better quality than your average fast food place like McDonalds or Burger King.

      Burger King coffee is actually quite good IF you can get it within 20 minutes of being made. The problem with BK coffee is not that it's bad, it's that it's usually stale because it'll sit there for 3+ hours on the warmer before Joe Highschooler bothers to make new stuff.

    199. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the very link you posted it looks like 35% of revenue goes to store employees(and this is including electricity and rent). So maybe 20% of revenue go to employees, probably less. The other 45% of your disingenuous 80% go to raw materials.

      And it has been decreasing every year according to what you posted.

    200. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by nwaack · · Score: 1

      So... you'd pay for a place to go and wait for someone while using the WiFi?

      I think I just had an idea for a business.

      Perhaps you could serve them coffee too.

      Or you could follow the Starbucks model and serve them scalding piss flavoured with syrup to reduce the cost.

      I wish I had mod points right now. This made me laugh so hard I almost spit out my mouthful of K-cup coffee!

    201. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I thought it was the rental fee for the table I use as my mobile office when I want a bit more space than offered by my car.

      At $0.50 / hour it's not the absolute cheapest workspace you can find, but it's close to it, and comes with a free coffee.

    202. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Why would a manual press be slower? I suppose if you can't find something productive to do while the water boils it might be. It's not like pressing the plunger takes a long time though.

    203. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Kohath · · Score: 1

      From the very link you posted it looks like 35% of revenue goes to store employees(and this is including electricity and rent). So maybe 20% of revenue go to employees, probably less. The other 45% of your disingenuous 80% go to raw materials.

      And it has been decreasing every year according to what you postedy.

      What’s your point? I was refuting the claim that "most" of the money "goes to the corporation and shareholders". 80% of it doesn't, so that's clearly false. Are you defending clearly false claims? If you are, why? How about making and defending true claims instead of false ones?

    204. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and coffee can also be made with just a ten dollar kettle (instant coffee).

      You're joking, right? That's not coffee. Even Charbucks would be better.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    205. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      Am I the only /. user that has a coffee maker at work?

      I have one sitting on the dorm fridge next to my desk. A grinder, too, and lately I've been bringing in beans I've roasted at home (though it's been a while since I've done that).

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    206. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If, like me, you're friendless, alone-in the world, etc...

      As for cute baristas... that's just a myth perpetuated by TV shows. They're all ugly.

      Ya don't say...

    207. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry man, your home must be really bad if Starbucks for you is "living-room" like. To me is is nothing like my living room. I don't drink that much coffee but for $15 I can get at least 6 months supply of the coffee that is way better than anything at Starbucks.

    208. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh bullshit. There's plenty of good tea in tea bags you clueless cunt.

    209. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      After too many failed drip coffee makers

      How are you abusing them that they keep failing (or were you buying the cheapest Chinesium coffee makers)? The one I use at work is a 25-year-old four-cup Mr. Coffee (from when they were still made in the USA) and the one I use at home is an 18-year-old Krups. They've kept plugging away with minimal maintenance (and a new carafe for the Krups when the original was bumped into something and cracked).

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    210. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Find another 9 things of equally trivial cost and there's the $100k right away, at the age of 30.

      And if you live like a miserable acetic you'll get it by 29 instead. Of course if you get hit by a bus at 28, then you've wasted it all.

      Can't take it with you whan you go and you only get to be young once. You don't want to waste life either since it's worth more than money.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    211. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Still not as bad as bottled water when the stuff from your tap is perfectly drinkable.

      Indeed, but it's a huge faff to drag the 15 mile hose around with me everywhere.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    212. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I'm not going to defend the 11$ coffee's and Avacado toasts, I am going to argue that not everything will ever be that cut and dry.

      For example. If you live near a mall food court, the food will of course be expensive, but you get far more variety, and if there is no driving involved, it costs less than buying groceries all things considered (like freshness and expiry dates)

      However, there will always be things that are not justified. I buy stuff from 7-11 a fair bit, because it's convenient at 2am. A time that cooking or washing dishes makes a lot of noise. I could save so much more money if I buy all this food in bulk, but then I have to eat the same damn sandwich for two weeks, three meals a day to make it cost effective.

      At some point you have to decide if saving money by being boring is also foolish. Nobody who spends money on coffee, actually needs coffee. But people who need food, do in fact need food.

    213. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talk about missing the point. The parent is speaking about savings. You know, the part of your income you don't spend, so that you have the money to invest. That has nothing to do with corporations. It's about how to go about getting the money so that a person has the money to risk on an investment.

      It seems you have a reading comprehension problem.

    214. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      If I just want coffee it's no big deal to do a pour over or French press at the office, but how do I make a latte without the required equipment? Yes, $5.00 for a drink at Cafe Baci is expensive, but what's the alternative? Starbucks and Lavazza cost just as much. Should I just do without?

      In any case, why are we listening to a guy who only drinks a single cup of coffee a day? He's clearly not someone who really likes it. There are a lot of things in life we don't actually require to go on living, but if we get rid of all of those things what's left to live for? You can't take your money with you when you die.

    215. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and tea made in a $2 stainless strainer is better tasting than that made in a teabag which imparts it's own flavor to the cup.

      I used to be both a coffee and tea drinker. I always bought my tea in bulk, market orance spice, and used the same strainer for more than a decade. I always bought my coffee in the form of beans too.

    216. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      It's normal to hate on audiophiles.

      It's stupid to think that the existence of $100/foot speaker cable means you should use 18 gauge wire instead.

      Same is true for tea snobs.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    217. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      That's because you think you are buying coffee. There is a lot more to the cafe environment than coffee. You can meet people there for example. There is also the convenience factor. It is much cheaper to pay $2.50 for coffee than it is to drive 45 minutes home each wsy, etc. This guy is just a douchebag trying to sound like he is brilliant. Yeah ... keep investing that $2.30 a day buddy. I'm sure you always eat bologna sandwiches too. Lying sack of shit.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    218. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You can get a really crappy hand operated 'burr grinder' in that ballpark. But you'll be grinding for a few minutes to get enough to make a decent strong cup, and it's chinesium crap that will break in a week.

      That said, whirring blades work fine with a frog press.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    219. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by slasher999 · · Score: 1

      This is true. Don't go to fancy coffee shops, buy good beans from a good roaster. Buy a good grinder and a good way to brew it. The only thing you are allowed to add is a small amount of sugar or similar sweetener. Honestly though good coffee really doesn't need sweetening.

    220. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Don't lie. You know you dream of being T-bagged every night.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    221. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Real coffee snobs will tell you it's bad 3 days after roasting. (While riding fixies and listening to vinyl records).

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    222. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when did the Amish invade Starbucks?

    223. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by jon3k · · Score: 1
      Here's what I recommend to anyone who drinks coffee, even occasionally, to make a great cup of coffee at home. For under $100 you can get all the equipment you need to make a great cup.

      Hardware

      And for the software, find a decent local roaster or just buy some online.

      With this formula you can make a genuinely great cup of coffee and you can do it in about 4-5 minutes and you can do it consistently. It takes me about 2 minutes to microwave water to 190-200 degrees, 10 second stir, and 20-30 second press. Now you've got a shot of espresso. Add some water for americano. All the prep can be done while the water is heating. Cleanup takes another minute, maybe two. You will eventually need to buy some more filters, but the price is negligible ($6.65 for 350).

    224. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To give you the justification I have for going to subway, kfc, or chipolte 3 times per week:

      a) The amount of time required to shop for fresh vegetables
      b) The amount of time required to prepare a cooked meal
      c) The amount of time required to travel to the either a grocery store or a convenience store or a fast-food type store

      Keep in mind that:
      I live within walking distance of everything so point 3 is moot except after 10pm to 10am when nothing is open but 7-11. Mcdonalds is open earlier, but Subway isn't.

      The average cost of a single meal is 11$. That meal is 100% of the calories I need for one day.

      How much is your time worth? If you make 12$/hr, does it take you less than an hour to drive to three different grocery stores to pick up fresh vegetables, fresh meat and fresh bread? I sincerely doubt it. If you make $50/hr, you can sure the hell afford to buy all your meals pre-prepared.

      That is the point.

      Nobody needs a $2.50-$12 cup of coffee, but if it is going to save someone from wasting an hour of their time, then picking up a coffee on your way to work is preferable to wasting an hour making it at home. People like Kevin O'leary perhaps should see the value in quitting coffee entirely, since seems to regard 18 cents being worth a half hour of his time.

    225. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 2

      But he doesn't even like coffee! That's like saying I saved $1,000 by not buying the iPhone X I didn't want.

    226. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by jon3k · · Score: 1

      You can get a burr grinder for $50 (or less) and an Aeropress for $30 or a Bialetti for $30. If you want to make lattes or capuccino, sure, but you don't need to spend hundreds of dollars to make fantastic espresso.

    227. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by martinX · · Score: 1

      My accountant's advice has always been to pay the mortgage down as quickly as you can. No point in "saving" money if you have big debt (unless it's your rainy day savings and you can deposit them in a mortgage offset account). Interest rates are low, pay it now.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    228. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by jon3k · · Score: 1

      The reason burr grinders are preferred has to do with consistency of the grind, which is really important. But you can get a decent burr grinder for under $50 that will last you decades.

    229. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      When I was 14, a co-worker cut the tip of a finger off. Using an electric slicer to cut cucumbers into a big old bowl of salad.

      After the chaos, getting him to the ER for stitches etc. We realized we couldn't find the fingertip and didn't have anymore lettice. Not much blood though...

      I just hope the fingertip ended up in a vegan's salad.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    230. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      Why would you pay your mortgage down versus investing the money? Is the rate on your mortgage really that high?

      I just bought a place a few months ago and got a rate below 3.9%. Meanwhile my worst performing investment has increased by 12% this year. At the time I wanted to make the biggest down payment possible, but in hindsight I sort of wish I have put down the minimum required. In the current environment it wouldn't make any sense to put any more money into the mortgage.

    231. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by martinX · · Score: 1

      Maccas is a franchise, so the franchisees take risks. Also, sticking with Maccas for the moment, they have a lot of competition in the fast food sector. They mightn't be going broke any time soon, but people still have to work at making money.

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    232. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a Bunn coffeemaker with an vacuum insulated carafe. $88 on clearance from Wal-Mart. Brews a pot in 5 minutes.

    233. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Not the OP, that nails Starbucks.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    234. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know that most people won't.

    235. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't you go back to r/incel?

    236. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by green1 · · Score: 1

      I visit the grocery store 1-2 times a month, that saves me a ton of time vs visiting a restaurant 3 times a day. So I save time, AND money.

      3 times a week at a restaurant saves you ZERO time on grocery shopping as you're obviously shopping for the other 18 meals a week (plus other necessities for the home such as toilet paper, cleaning supplies, etc etc) So changing your quantities enough to cover the other 3 meals makes no difference in time.

      As for what your time is worth. Your time is worth only what others are willing to pay for it, and after work hours, that's usually zero.

      As for making coffee, making it at home takes under a minute of active time (the time spend brewing is time you're doing something else usually) However "picking it up on your way to work" takes a bare minimum of 5 minutes, likely closer to 10-15. Remember to count right from the time you deviate from your normal driving, until you're back driving the most direct route and at full speed.

    237. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      You're memory is going. There were a few years were that wasn't true.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    238. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good, luck. If you make eye contact, this day and age, with everyone wearing ear buds, you are the village creep.

    239. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know I'm preaching to the choir here, but....always do the math! Wherever you see a menu, a closeout sale, a grocery ad, any kind of goods or services offered in exchange for money, ALWAYS do the math.

      Figure in the time and hassle involved in doing it yourself or doing without, but always do run the figures. It's amazing how much of information asymmetry is due, not to information being absent, but to it being hidden behind marketing-speak that can be easily penetrated if you do the math.

    240. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why we have "Joe and the juice" which has hiring policies like an expensive nightclub...

    241. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Enough. If it wasn't enough they'd quit their shit jobs.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    242. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mines only 15 inches. BTW tell your mom to stop stalking me.

    243. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also by that argument his Starbucks coffee costs a lot more than $2.50, given how long you have to wait for it to be made.

    244. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://nordic.businessinsider.com/this-notorious-danish-juice-chain-that-only-hires-hunks-is-completely-conquering-the-world-2016-8/

    245. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by anegg · · Score: 1

      Except for those who inherit or are handed wealth by others, we all have to start someplace, and it may be with just $50. If $50 is all you ever have to invest, you aren't going to get very far. Passive investing works best when you have a steady amount of $$ to invest, and you can use "dollar cost averaging" to take the ups and downs out of the market. $50/week will go far.

      The person with $100k to invest in stocks probably started with less, and learned along the way, and so will do dramatically better (even in a relative/proportional sense) than the person with $50 who is (probably) just starting out. I don't think much of investment consultants, and I haven't made a habit of consulting them, so I wouldn't attribute the success of the $100k investor to them. My best "advisor" was this book: https://www.amazon.com/Only-Investment-Guide-Youll-Ever/dp/0544781937/ref=dp_ob_title_bk, but you might have to gain some experience to believe what you read.

      The worst mistakes I've seen people make are to time the market, to pull their $$ out AFTER a big stomach-clenching drop (because they are afraid of a further drop), to get greedy with exotic strategies ("let's trade options, shall we?"), and to sit out the market waiting for prices to drop so that they can "buy low" and "sell high." Oh, and to pull their money out of a 401(k)/IRA/investment plan because of an "emergency." (If it is your money or your life [or the life of someone you care about] then its an emergency. Otherwise, leave the $$ in the market.) Pick sane investments (index mutual funds have done me well), know your investment time horizon, and stick to your plans.

      I interpret the advice from Mr. O'Leary as suggesting that you avoid unnecessary expense, spending your money where it will bring what you regard as true value. His advice on buying coffee wouldn't help me; I don't drink coffee. However, I did have a bad "eat lunch out" habit that boosted my investments once I kicked it. I also learned to subscribe to the magazines I liked instead of buying them at the newsstand (and reading them at the library is even cheaper and avoids a lot of waste). I also stopped reading the advertisement supplements in the Sunday paper... turns out you "need" a lot less when you don't think about it in the first place. (Adjust as necessary for however you imbibe your daily quota of advertising today.) Spend time hanging out with/interacting with friends; keep busy by volunteering to help others and doing something you find rewarding; discover activities and pursuits you enjoy that don't require a constant stream of $$ out of your pocket. In the end you will spend less, save more, and find you will probably need less later so that what you have saved will last longer.

      Some thoughts:

      https://torah.org/learning/pirkei-avos-chapter4-1b/

      http://time.com/money/collection-post/4034098/get-rich-secret/

    246. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      As for saving 20 minutes, I'd question that too, because from the time my alarm clock goes off, until I walk out the door is only 30 minutes total, and that includes eating breakfast, and getting a 2 year old ready, fed, and out the door too.

      In the interest of full disclosure, however, he does work and live in a nudist colony.

    247. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by h4ck7h3p14n37 · · Score: 1

      Tap water is perfectly drinkable if you don't mind the lead, minerals or sulphur smell. There's a reason people buy reverse-osmosis filtered water.

    248. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by reboot246 · · Score: 1

      That's fairly accurate, but the reason they tend to roast darker than normal is to disguise the quality and origin of the coffee. Coffee roasted past the second snaps pretty much all taste the same - you're getting the flavor of the roast. Lighter roasts give you more of the flavor of the origin.

      I roast my own beans and can assure you I make a better cup of coffee than any Charbuck$ out there, and usually better than most any other coffee shop.

      It's not hard to roast coffee. Getting it right takes a little bit of experience, but even if it's a little bit off from what your target roast was, it's way better than store-bought coffee or coffee shop coffee.

    249. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After our first year of retirement (i.e. invited pre-layoff), I looked at our expenses and realized that between SO and myself, we'd spent $5K that year at Starbucks, a significant percentage of our annual budget. Never again! I found a local bakery that sells a "tall" equivalent coffee for $1.50, and gives away a slice of bread or quarter of a muffin for free. Much better, cheaper, and supports a local entrepreneur.

    250. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      For filter coffee (still the most popular brewing method), either drip machine or manual pour over, grind size isn't that big of an issue.

      Sure, if you're doing espresso at home, or Turkish/Greek coffee, you need an extremely fine grind. But for filter? Blade works fine.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    251. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by asliarun · · Score: 2

      Not to mention that most of those coffee houses serve absolute crap for coffee

      That must be an American thing. Though I have to agree the only truly bad coffee I've had at a coffee shop was at a Starbucks.

      You must be from Australia.

    252. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by jon3k · · Score: 1

      You're welcome to your opinion, but I can tell you from experience that changing from a blade to burr grinder was an obvious improvement in the quality and consistency of the coffee I make. And how you make your cofee isn't relevant. A consistent grind size means a consistent extraction from the bean.

    253. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Enough is enough. We have sufferred for 350 years from the yolk of coffeehouses, giving us such abomination as Rotonda in Paris.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    254. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by taustin · · Score: 1

      Bose recommends you buy your speaker wire from your local hardware store, in the form of lamp cord. They certainly know more about the subject than I do, so I'll take their word for it. You, on the other hand, are some guy on the internet

      Plus, of course, most people can't tell the difference between Monster cable and coat hanger wire.

      It's normal to hate on audiophiles because it's normal for audiophiles to be idiots.

    255. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by narcc · · Score: 1

      Why do I even try?

    256. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      $10 an hour? Heh. Yeah, if that were my salary I would probably be making coffee by pouring cold water over the grinds which my neighbour threw out.

    257. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I empty out the old grounds and rinse the strainer and spout with water which cleans off any stray grounds. This only takes a few seconds. I never use soap which contaminates the flavor of the coffee. I never worry about bacteria because the hot water sterilizes everything every time I use it.

      I think you may have missed the point. If you don't clean it out, you may not even notice, because you condition yourself slowly while the flavor of the coffee changes as the rancid build-ups grow.
      But don't serve that to others, because they are not likewise conditioned.

    258. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by mspohr · · Score: 1

      My Delonghi espresso machine warms up in less than a minute.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    259. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Yes, I clean the strainer, the spout and the clamp. If you do it for every cup of espresso, it doesn't take long. I can grind, clean and press a new shot in less than a minute.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    260. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      I ordered an iced coffee at McDonalds recently after hearing everyone say this, and it was gross. Much too watery. Maybe the hot coffee is better, but don't try ordering something that takes more than hitting a button to make.

      As much as there is to complain about with Starbucks, I've never had a problem with the quality of the coffee or the training of the staff.

    261. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by green1 · · Score: 1

      If it takes you more than 5 minutes to get dressed, you're doing something wrong!

    262. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Uh, where I live we have tea shops where the snobs shop, and they definitely have expensive snobby teabags.

    263. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      You should see the crap Europeans eat! My friend visited Albania and took some pictures.

      Notice the problem?

    264. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      If you wave your hands and insist they are not the same leaves, you can't also claim to have done the proposed taste test.

      Your story isn't even self consistent, so of course it is bullshit and you just don't know what you're talking about.

      Visit a tea shop sometime. You can get the exact same grade of leaf from the exact same farm loose in a can with a rubber seal, or in bags in the same can. Tea snobs have an extensive leaf grading system, they really do know if it is the same leaves.

    265. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      No, they don't use lamp cord because the expensive speaker wire is made of durable rubber that lasts 100 years and spreads the forces out to reduce damage when asshole musicians roll their stools back and forth across it, and step on it all day.

      Everybody knows it sounds the same before you run over it.

      Just like, everybody knows cheap headphone cords sound the same as expensive headphone cords; until the solder joint fails on the cheap one because instead of quality stress relief it just has a knot tied above the joint to make some slack.

      Also, directional audio ethernet cables sound exactly the same as computer ethernet cables; if you're a moron who doesn't know about ground loops and didn't connect the right ends in the right places to maintain a single ground path for noise. Of course, people who did know how to connect the grounds and are looking at the noise floor on their mixer, they did notice the difference.

      It isn't enough to know that the copper is the same purity in both; there are other differences.

      And if you want your black tea to taste "peppery," you can ruin good tea too; just steep it a little too long, at too high a temperature.

    266. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      A fake placebo effect is when the patient didn't believe that it was real medicine, and the doctor also didn't believe it was real medicine, but it was and it worked. So the effect would be considered a placebo, but it would be a fake placebo effect.

    267. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      People who aren't going to step on their audio equipment or roll over it with a music stool or accidentally yank on it don't need special speaker wire.

      Even if Bose and Monster Cable are both overpriced, they're rarely purchased by the same customers.
      Bose mostly sells consumer audio equipment, you see very very little bose equipment in professional-quality studios, including home studios.

      The main market for Monster brand cables is home studios. Professional studios tend to use more expensive wiring. Why? Durability. Monster is more about the hand of the rubber, and the quality of the plug end connection. More expensive cables give you the reliable plugs and also increased end to end durability. A small music studio might have $20k worth of just cords. Why? So that when shit doesn't work, it is never the cord.

      Last summer I pulled a cheap phone plug out and the tip detached and stayed inside the socket! It was just a friction fit post.

    268. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      so people who can't/don't drink decaf aren't left out

      Europeans do everything backwards.

    269. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      If you just trim the last two words off though then it goes back to being true.

      Just give it 5 minutes to settle, and pour carefully.

    270. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      While generally true, with experience you can get a fairly consistent grind with a cheap blade grinder by pulsing it just so.

    271. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      Buy your beans at Costco, they're less than half the price.

    272. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Gussington · · Score: 0

      Decades ago, they made this machine that would automatically brew a hot cup of shit coffee

      FTFY

      The true stupidity is listening to the Starbucks generation

      Starbucks is equally shit.
      I don't think Americans know what good coffee is.

    273. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh - I give you the RADIG Espresso Maker:
      http://www.ikea.com/my/en/catalog/products/90163224/

    274. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must poop at work. Time thief.

    275. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it only saves you $4, then it's either an incredibly cheap breakfast, or you way over-estimate the cost it would take to make your own.

      As for saving 20 minutes, I'd question that too, because from the time my alarm clock goes off, until I walk out the door is only 30 minutes total, and that includes eating breakfast, and getting a 2 year old ready, fed, and out the door too.

      I'm pretty certain you're also underestimating the time it takes to order, get your breakfast, and eat it at the drive-through.

      I call bullshit on the 30 minutes - youtube or it never happened. And, take a shower you fucking stink bomb.

    276. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by green1 · · Score: 1

      Shower at night, why would you want to sleep covered in the day's grime?

    277. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When ya gotta go, ya gotta go!

    278. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Domestic espresso machines are pretty much as quick as making a cup of instant coffee assuming you have to boil a kettle..

      False. The little green light may come on, but the temperature remains wildly unstable until the entire boiler has reached an equilibrium temperature. That's beside the fact that it's practically impossible to make a latte in under a few minutes until you then don't clean the machine you just used on a dairy product.

    279. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No it doesn't. It will claim it is ready in less than a minute. But you can check this yourself. Use a logging thermocouple the bottom of the group handle and graph the temperature swings while drawing the coffee as soon as the machine is ready vs letting it sit there for 10 minutes.

      I would bet you a Marsbar but that would be unfair since the discussions about it and tests on basically every coffee machine are in every forum on the internet, so I already know the answer.

      Do yourself a favour, if you can't wait 10 minutes, at the very draw water through your machine and don't attempt to make coffee from the first time your machine is ready.

    280. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are rolling over the wire to your monitor speakers with your chair in your home studio, either it is poorly designed or you are a slob.

    281. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Eat nothing but potatoes and you'll retire even earlier. Then maybe during retirement you can find this thing called a life that you denied yourself for years of skimping.

      Kind of like starting the day with instant mud instead of getting a nice well made coffee at a specialty cafe.

      As far as my barbaric process, I don't drink coffee.

      That was painfully clear from your post.

    282. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have cable runs that people roll chairs over, the first question is why not have sensible studio design and cable runs. The second is why don't you use lamp cord and spend $20 in IKEA on some cable protectors? Buying expensive cables is foolish.

    283. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Look, if are trying to be obtuse, I can explain it to you again, no problem whatsoever. I like talking about tea.

      You see, the fannings and dust that come into tea bags are not the same leaves. However gyokuro and konacha (which is gyokuro dust and fannings) do come from the same leaves, but konacha doesn't go into tea bags, it is sold as loose fannings for people who own a kyusu with a fine enough mesh.

      Konacha is the proof that even if the fannings would come from the same leaves, they still would taste quite different from the "whole" leaf tea. Given that, the notion that bagged tea, despite having not just fannings, but completely diffent leaves inside, would taste the same as loose tea, is, frankly, ridiculous.

      Do you get it now or shall I go further into detail?

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    284. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I have both an inexpensive blade grinder and a good manual burr grinder (Hario Skerton). It does make a difference for French press because of the coarse sieve, but for Aeropress, Moka pot and filter coffee, the difference seems purely academic.

      The biggest difference is that the Hario takes 3-5 minutes to grind enough for a cup of coffee, whereas the blade grinder takes 5-10 seconds.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    285. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm talking about the kettles (both electric and not) that are used by hipster douchebags to pour hot water over coffee in a filter in a holder perched on top of a mug, so-called "pour over coffee".

      Isn't that just making coffee the traditional way but in a cup instead of a coffee pot?

      You must be talking about old-fashioned kettles where you mix the ground coffee directly with the water and let it sit, like a tea pot and loose-leaf tea, where the design of the kettle keeps most of the grounds from pouring out.

      I've never seen such a contraption. Does it work?

    286. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Isn't that just making coffee the traditional way but in a cup instead of a coffee pot?

      Yes, that's exactly what it is. Doesn't stop people from overcomplicating it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      It's perfectly OK to want to kill people after watching that video.

      I've never seen such a contraption. Does it work?

      Yeah, somewhat. It always lets stuff through a little bit. Which kind of kettle are you talking about?

      --
      Eat the rich.
    287. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by jellomizer · · Score: 2

      Also the 2.50 isn’t really a ripoff. For a guy who is big into investing he should know to look at just the raw materials.
      There is the cost of having a bulding rented. Decorated in a style to match the companies brand. Then you have at least 3 or 4 employees on staff even if there isn’t any business.
      Now to the point if you want to invest in money to make more, you should be wise in the little things, brew your own. However if you are rich then the convience may be more worth it then the money you save making your own. So if you are making over 400k a year the minute saved getting the coffee is worth more then the cost of the store coffee. Granted this guy is an investor so his money isn’t time sensitive, but other jobs such as a CEO where times they are not working wastes money.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    288. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Most people live in neighborhoods where such things take only a couple of minutes.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    289. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I think he means coffee and breakfast. It actually takes about 10 minuets to cook a good hearty breakfast. There is preparation cooking and cleanup time. Vs just waiting in line for a minute and an other minute to get your food.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    290. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well not all coffee shops are Starbucks. Not all Starbucks are slow. The one I go to runs like a well tuned machine in and out under 2 minutes.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    291. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I just want coffee it's no big deal to do a pour over or French press at the office, but how do I make a latte without the required equipment?

      A cow would be the required equipment, but you can also just buy latte in a supermarket or grocery shop. Chances are they won't label it as latte when the shop is not in Italy, though.

    292. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by worf_mo · · Score: 1

      Most people I know make their espresso with a moka pot. You can get a pot for less than 20 Euro and use it on a stove or electrically (various models exist). Add water in the bottom chamber and ground coffee in the basket above, apply heat and wait until it boils; makes an excellent espresso. We have pots in different sizes. It's kind of a must for any Italian household.

    293. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Java Blend?

    294. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      I ordered an iced coffee at McDonalds recently after hearing everyone say this, and it was gross. Much too watery. Maybe the hot coffee is better, but don't try ordering something that takes more than hitting a button to make.

      As much as there is to complain about with Starbucks, I've never had a problem with the quality of the coffee or the training of the staff.

      I tried their hot coffee a few months back and found it just as bad as it's always been- the only difference is they gave it a fancier name.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    295. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by mspohr · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the information.
      My usual practice is to let it warm up while I get breakfast so it's usually at least 10 minutes before I use it.

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    296. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's like someone giving you a "shit sandwich" and you saying "thanks! i'll just remove the shit"

    297. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, marketrealist.com, the Flat Earth Society of economics websites.

    298. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      "What's more important to you? Your time or your money. For a lot of people it's the former."

      And to Mr O'Leary's point, that's the reason that many of those people will continue to live payday to payday, and complain that they don't make a living wage.

      If you're there as an escape from kids, the office, etc., that's one thing. If you're there for the coffee, you're a fool.

      My kid started going to Starbucks when she was in high school, because all the cool kids were doing it. Then she couldn't figure out why her allowance was covering all the things they were supposed to. It was one of the lessons that I let her figure out, because she wasn't getting more for that from us.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    299. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      "Tea snobs who like tea don't use tea bags."

      FTFY...just like the vast majority of people who can't tell the difference between a $10 bottle of wine and something in the $100+ range, but turn their noses up.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    300. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      We used to, but often got grief because people would forget to turn off their machines at the office, which becomes a fire hazard. The up side is that we've now got free K-cups

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    301. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who like coffee never use instant, or even worse ... Sanka.

    302. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? You must be a Starbucks shill, or else you're simply an elitist coffee snob that couldn't actually tell the difference in a blind test.

    303. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Without that money going to the corporation and shareholders, you wouldn't actually have all of those shops and jobs for those people you "deserve" it.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    304. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      As someone who started investing with $600 worth of an electric utility stock back in '82, which is now worth over $33k, (not to mention all of the additional funds I invested over that period) I'd beg to differ. It's not rocket science. But it does require you to do some homework, and not pretend to be a day trader...you might as well go to Vegas. I suspect you don't actually know a lot of folks with $100k to invest.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    305. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That video is what happens when you replace grandparents with hipsters. Bad idea.

    306. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your times are bullshit, and you know it.

    307. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except paying for water in a cute little plastic bottle.

    308. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      The coffee shop explosion is one of the great rip-offs of our age

      Still not as bad as bottled water when the stuff from your tap is perfectly drinkable.

      In general, I'll agree. However, drinkability varies from location to location. That said, I'm perfectly happy with my filtered water.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    309. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always see it as rent - for a lot of people it is a place to sit and work or relax and the drink minimum is really space rent.

    310. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Equivalent to using the kettle is a "French Press" Its sold at TJMAX, IKEA for around $10.00. Some high end "French Presses" are sold in businesses that sell high priced kitchen ware.
      Don't buy a French press with a plastic base. The coffee cools down to fast in that design. The more expensive FP has a shutter on the top of the filter ring to prevent heat loss. If you are curious as to differences, visit a coffee retailer.

      I actually buy a can of Kirkland Coffee (3 lbs) and a can of Folgers (3 lbs) and mix the two grinds together. That's in my airtight coffee can with a two spoon measuring cup.
      One cup = 1 serving. Been doing that for 10 years. My personal "French Press" can make two 10 oz coffee cups at one time

      Occasionally I try other brands and grind beans, but I tend to go back to my home mixture.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    311. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are an idiot

    312. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      $2/day is about $730/year, which is about $8K over eleven years. You need about fourteen years to get that $10K. If you buy coffee only on workdays, it's about $500/year, and it takes twenty years to get that $10K. (Is there an interest rate you'd like to propose?)

      And, yes, if you waste a lot of money you can save a lot of money by not wasting it. Having a $2/day coffee habit doesn't guarantee that you have nine other $2/day habits that you can easily kick.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    313. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by loufoque · · Score: 1

      what's wrong with wearing a scarf indoors? it's a perfectly valid garment that on top of being stylish also keeps you warm.

    314. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      That means if he spends one minute 15 seconds making his coffee then it is costing him $2.50 in time alone

      That's assuming that he would be working during the time he's making coffee.
      Maybe it just cuts into his free time, and maybe his free time is far more valuable to him than $2.50.

    315. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      He and his friend bitch about how they are being exploited, and then BUY THE COFFEE ANYWAY. I think the moral of this scene was supposed to be about how the rich exploit the poor, but I think it was really "idiots will be idiots".

      I haven't seen the movie, but it might be a good example of the Sunk Cost Fallacy as well. They already put in the "cost" of the wait in line, so there's the emotional desire to get SOMETHING out of that time spent.

    316. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      The only "evening prep" is that I shower at night instead of in the morning (I sleep so much better when I'm clean!)

      I'm glad I'm not the only one who does this! People think I'm weird sometimes for showering right before bed. Normally I do shower in the morning, but if I feel particularly grimy at the end of the day... ugh, I just can't sleep like that!

    317. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by vandamme · · Score: 1

      Only if you buy a real Keurig, and buy the little plastic cups instead of grinding beans and brewing in reuseable cups.

    318. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      I wonder how much people just don't think about how much things cost. $2.50 is a sufficiently small amount that it's not worth keeping track of. $2.50 a couple of times a day feels psychologically like it's still in the noise. Over $1,200 per year feels a lot more, but it's not until you do the calculation that you realise how much you're spending. If at that price it still does seem worth it, great, but it might not be the best way of translating $1,200 into an improvement in your quality of living.

      Unless somebody is budgeting their money to begin with, it doesn't matter because that $2.50/day will just evaporate into other things, just like I'm sure Mr. O'Leary's money does. He might save $2.50 on coffee, but probably loses it on something else he likes that other people do without. If they are budgeting their money, then they know what they are spending on, or at least how much they are spending, and are good with that.

    319. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're not already rich? Yes, you should do without. Luxuries are expensive, and as long as you need to care about having a budget, you must choose your indulgences carefully.

      $5 a day for your latte costs you more than $12,000 over the course of 10 years. Invested, that would also give you another $1000 in interest.

      It's not about "taking your money with you when you die", it's about having freedom later in life. That $13k in the bank gives you more options than the daily expensive coffee.

    320. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      If you're using the coffee up at a sufficiently quick pace, don't bother with buying a grinder at all. Just buy it somewhere that will grind it for you as you watch if you're really particular about the length of time between it getting ground and brewed, or buy stuff that was shipped preground.

      But, really, if you want a good grinder for cheap, hit up a thrift store or the like for an old coffee mill. The one I use is older than me, and very likely to remain functional even once an antique.

    321. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      Depends on what kind, and what prep you're using. There's a few styles of tea where you are making, well, tea broth: you boil the water with the tea leaves in, and some where the tea leaves stay in the whole time so the last cups from the pot can be quite...bracing.

      There is overlap.

    322. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Different AC here. Of course it depends on your particular circumstances. Obviously if you're making minimum wage, you're not going to have many expenses that *can* be cut! But for *most* people, there are some frivolous habit expenses that are eating a surprising amount of disposable income. This topic can be useful as a wake-up call on those things.

      If your expenses are already trimmed down, idk, look for a better-paying job? Of course there are no guarantees there either, but hey, you do what you can, right?

    323. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by baristabrian · · Score: 0

      Are you sure they keep it on a "warmer?" A lot of places use air pots. Properly prepped (pre-warmed with boiling water), they keep coffee "fresh" for HOURS. Totally approved by SCAA.

      --
      -- "I'm not in a hurry; I'm in Hawaii." The Homeless Guy
    324. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      Only if you buy a real Keurig, and buy the little plastic cups instead of grinding beans and brewing in reuseable cups.

      A) There was a time when you couldn't do that with the Keurig 2.0
      B) There are plenty of other coffee makers that come with "reusable cups" (they call them filters) from the factory.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    325. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and getting a 2 year old ready, fed, and out the door too.

      What, a 2 year old robot? Certainly not a 2 year old human!

    326. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://people.com/celebrity/topless-coffee-shops-the-bikini-baristas-of-washington/

    327. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Just visit a fucking tea shop and find out if you can buy any grade of tea in a bag.

      It should be very easy to realize that you're making an absurd "No True Scotsman" claim that is refuted at numerous existing teashops. This isn't a theory. Or an idea. You can literally buy custom-filled teabags at many shops. That makes your claim impossible.

    328. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that most of those coffee houses serve absolute crap for coffee

      That must be an American thing. Though I have to agree the only truly bad coffee I've had at a coffee shop was at a Starbucks.

      Starbucks coffee tastes muddy and moldy. And brewed overly strong. Maybe that's why beople get stupid in the way they want it as well. Keep putting more stuff in it until it numbs teh tongue, maybe? I prefer wither black or a bit of half and half, and two equals.

      If I'm feeling nostalgic, I'll sub evaporated milk for the half and half, because that's how my grandmother made coffee for us when I was a little kid.

      At home, I drink Lacas City Roast, beans roasted by some guy in Philadelphia. https://www.lacascoffee.com/pr...

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    329. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      People often don't understand just how much those little things add up. A lot of little expenses every day. A 5 dollar Starbucks coffee every day adds up to over 1800 dollars a year. Get something to much on can drive that wll over 2K. 20 K over a decade. Coupled with it being shit coffee, it's bad personal finance.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    330. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Darker, you mean burned. Starbucks stuff is always burned. It's crap. Yet stupid people shovel out big bucks for it.
      I make my own, every day. Not the K cup stuff either, good old filters, folgers or maxwell house. I even got a deal on Krispy Kream coffee recently.

    331. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Half of the tea shops in Frankfurt am Main and all tea shops in the Hochtaunus district have know me by sight (and some even by name) for years and in the German TeaGschwendner head office still hangs a picture I've drawn for them two decades ago so don't tell me about visiting tea shops, all right?

      Custom filled teabags are not an usual service here because it simply doesn't make sense. Loose tea doesn't fit well into tea bags and doesn't have enough room to unroll in the hot water hence it isn't done.

      If teabaggers like you are content with the crap you drink, I don't mind, but don't go around pretending that it is the same as a decent loose tea.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    332. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

      It's people who micro manage their minutes who need to learn something about finance (and about a lot more besides).
      They probably take their work with them when they have a crap.

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
    333. Re: Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do not need to thoroughly clean portafilter, just knock coffee cake and rinse it under running water, through cleaning is once a week affair (put portafilter and filter in big mug, add boiling water and detergent, rinse thoroughly quarter of an hour later).
      Other part of ritual is brushing a washer of espresso machine's coffee group, 3-5 seconds.

      Preheating espresso machine is easy, I fill boiler in the evening, install portafilter on coffee group and leave it on. I a timer to switch power on. It is set to close the circuit 15 minutes before my alarm clock and break the circuit at the time I should leave if I want to catch my commuter's train.

    334. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      First off, Bose? 901s are good mid drivers, but the rest of their product line is just _incredibly_overpriced_ junk. (901s are overpriced too)

      Bose does not recommend 'lamp cord' generically for all wattages and cable lengths. You're just making that up. They will discuss watts carried and distance to get to a recommended cable size, because they have actual electrical engineering degrees.

      What gauge equivalent is coat hanger wire? About 10?

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    335. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Most of the studio cords are instrument cords. Because they take the vast majority of the abuse and carry signal to the recording equipment, where it _really_ matters.

      Most musicians coil their cords in a way that's almost guaranteed to shorten their lives. Coil them into rounds, then just grab the ends and pull to uncoil, putting twists on the wire with every coil/uncoil cycle.

      The main market for 'monster' anything is morons. Good quality speaks/amps don't use 'push' to connect wiring anyhow.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    336. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by jon3k · · Score: 1

      As I said, you're welcome to your opinion. But there are many, many resources on the internet that will disagree with your assessment. And my burr grinder can grind a cup in about 15 seconds and was under $100.

    337. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by jon3k · · Score: 1

      I just don't believe that, sorry. It would just be pure chance. Trying to imply you can somehow manage the distribution of thousands of particles of coffee bean and ensure that it's evenly ground is just silly.

    338. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Chance is a stupid explanation. Just sayin'.

    339. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine has a recording studio, and we were talking about his cords a few months ago, and he said most of his $250 German ones are over 25 years old and he's never had one go bad.

      That's the difference. The cheap ones, as you say, have their life shortened through typical use by musicians. And if it isn't even their cord, but belongs to the studio? Yeah, they're not taking special care of it. ;)

      The expensive ones are not necessarily having their life shortened by it.

    340. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      The internet is not a credible source of information. It's handy and very easy, but hardly anyone bothers to check facts.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    341. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Internet is a medium, not an information source.

      Your comment makes about as much sense as saying, "radio is not a credible source of information," or "books are not a credible source of information."

    342. Re:Wholeheartedly agree by jon3k · · Score: 1

      You realize the irony of posting this on the internet, right?

  2. Invest in Apple, But Don't Buy iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If everyone followed his advice our Clown World economy would collapse.

    1. Re:Invest in Apple, But Don't Buy iPhone by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's basically the idea behind the Chinese economy boom. Produce the crap for the West but don't buy the shit yourself.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Invest in Apple, But Don't Buy iPhone by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Not only that, many of the businesses he invests in on Shark Tank, are convenience businesses. I can't imagine 3-7 day old cupcakes are all that spectacular, but that is one of his famous deals he brags about.

      I follow his advice, buy the business, not the product it sells.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    3. Re:Invest in Apple, But Don't Buy iPhone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'd still rather live in deep south USA than anywhere in China.

    4. Re:Invest in Apple, But Don't Buy iPhone by GerryHattrick · · Score: 1

      Real PRC Chinese select tea and herbs in a glass jar at home, have it refilled all day with boiling water from kiosks at minimal cost. At high-end meetings, you get a mug with one teabag and it gets refilled from a kettle of boiling water as often as you empty it.

    5. Re:Invest in Apple, But Don't Buy iPhone by hazardPPP · · Score: 1

      If everyone followed his advice our Clown World economy would collapse.

      My thoughts exactly. "There's a lot of crap you don't need," he says. Kinda like most of the stuff being pitched on Shark Tank. Kinda like Shark Tank itself. Or TV game shows in general. Or...

    6. Re:Invest in Apple, But Don't Buy iPhone by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Actually, at the high-end meetings I have been to in China, there is a nice young lady whose job it seem to be to grin at you and keep the pot with the tea leaves filled and hot.

      You should go to better high-level meetings, tea bags are actually pretty much an insult to anyone who likes tea.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:Invest in Apple, But Don't Buy iPhone by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Mmm... I've been to the US, I've been to China, and while on average there's more places in the US than in China that I'd like to be in, there ARE places in China I would prefer over some of the areas I had to stay in in the US.

      The Chinese quickly learned how to build luxury apartments and hotels!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  3. That isn't advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's just the man's personality. As someone once said about writing code in a certain scripting language, there is more than one way to do it.

    1. Re:That isn't advice by geekmux · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's just the man's personality. As someone once said about writing code in a certain scripting language, there is more than one way to do it.

      Paying $3 for a cup of coffee every morning for 40 years = $43,800

      Paying 20 cents for a cup of coffee every morning for 40 years = $2,920

      That's a difference of over $40 thousand dollars. It's a hell of a lot more than that if you took that money and invested it over a 40-year span.

      This is advice. Financial advice. And the hipster masses perpetually carrying around a caramel-drizzled fuckachino bitching about always being broke would probably be wise to listen.

    2. Re:That isn't advice by gnick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Paying 20 cents for a cup of coffee every morning for 40 years = $2,920

      Having a company-stocked Keurig? Priceless. Am I the only one with a coffee maker at work? Even before I took this job with the stocked Keurig, we had a coffee maker with an honor-system can for buying coffee.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    3. Re:That isn't advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OK But you can apply this to any form of entertainment. You could always be saving money. It's always cheaper to cook at home. It's always cheaper to buy a six pack of beer than meet friends at a bar. It's cheaper to watch movies that come over basic television than to than buy/rent/ or go to the movies. It's cheaper to sit in your room and stare at he wall than to take a vacation. Yeah, so what?

      Also, the guy is disingenuously muddying the idea of paying for a service and paying for a more expensive version of the product.: (frape-latte-blah-blah-blah-woof-woof-woof). OK you like black coffee better, but some people are willing to pay for something tastes better. It would be like telling people they are wasting money buying a craft beer instead of the cheapest forty. Again, yeah, so what?

    4. Re:That isn't advice by gachunt · · Score: 1

      At my company, we have a coffee club with "all you can drink" coffee from a Bunn coffee maker. Membership is $6 per month. I drink 2-3 cups per day ( average 60-70 / month, or approx. $0.10 per cup)

      Each year, we end up with a sizable surplus, which (this year) covered everyone's monthly fee for December.

      ( Last year, the surplus went toward group Lottery Tickets. We learned that was a waste of money as well. )

    5. Re:That isn't advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, the guy is disingenuously muddying the idea of paying for a service and paying for a more expensive version of the product.: (frape-latte-blah-blah-blah-woof-woof-woof). OK you like black coffee better, but some people are willing to pay for something tastes better. It would be like telling people they are wasting money buying a craft beer instead of the cheapest forty. Again, yeah, so what?

      A craft beer still tastes like beer.

      A "frape-latte-blah-blah-blah-woof-woof-woof" doesn't even remotely taste like coffee beans anymore, which shows the true stupidity.

    6. Re:That isn't advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn some fucking math. $2.50 per day is peanuts. It doesn't matter if over an entire lifetime it adds up to a big, impressive sounding number. $40K is a shitty return on a life-long project.

      People today can choose between being broke and enjoying fancy coffee or being broke and settling for boring coffee (or, I suppose they could be broke and have no coffee). That is the problem that these dipshit financial scolds can't figure out (or want other dipshits to be distracted by).

      And suppose everyone takes this advice. The restaurant and retail economies crater, destroying a lot of low income jobs. Demand in general collapses and takes the stock markets and everything else into the toilet. All those "smart" penny ante investors have nothing to show for their discipline, but rich assholes are just fine.

      Stop being a sap.

    7. Re:That isn't advice by thegarbz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is advice. Financial advice

      You want advice. Live under a bridge. Eat nothing but potatoes, don't ever pay someone for something you can do yourself regardless of how long it takes you. Then you will truly be saving money.

      It's a fucked life, but hey, every dollar right?

    8. Re:That isn't advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he said, while using an electronic device worth several thousand coffees

    9. Re:That isn't advice by c · · Score: 2

      Paying $3 for a cup of coffee every morning for 40 years = $43,800

      Worse yet, there are people who will regularly leave their home/workplace and drive somewhere for the sole purpose of getting a cup of coffee and bringing it back to where they were. Sometimes they'll do this multiple times per day!

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    10. Re:That isn't advice by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Ugh, your workplace should really just get a couple of drip machines instead of that vaguely coffee-flavored mud a Keurig produces.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    11. Re:That isn't advice by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your workplace doesn't supply the coffee for free to you? What kind of third-world hellhole do you live in?

      --
      Eat the rich.
    12. Re:That isn't advice by gnick · · Score: 1

      We have a Bunn that fills a carafe, but it rarely gets used. Most of us prefer the Keurig; we have a dozen or so choices of coffees, teas, cocoa, or apple cider. Preferences differ, but nobody complains that they can't find something they like.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    13. Re:That isn't advice by WrongMonkey · · Score: 2

      There is such a thing as being so cheap that it is not financially sound. Having clean clothes and showering every day gives you a massive increase in earning potential. Living near a major city provides access to more job opportunities. Having a balanced diet prevents costly health problems in the future. IMO, the most financially efficient lifestyle is owning a home in a city, but renting out some rooms to cover the costs. If you own a three bedroom house and you're renting out two of the rooms, you should be close to break-even. With none of the downsides of living under a bridge.

    14. Re: That isn't advice by houghi · · Score: 1

      We have some thing with pads, not the keurig one and people use their own pads for thhose who do nott like the free coffee from the machine.

      Pads and cups are also a way to charge people more for a cheap product. Bit like charging for a fixed IP for a adsl or cable connection that always will have an IP anyway.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    15. Re:That isn't advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My feeling on the topic is if I wanted a sweet drink with caffeine, I'd drink Mountain Dew. From a sweetness standpoint, it tastes better than coffee. I drink coffee to enjoy the quality of a well made product, not some slap-together sweet drink to sate my thirst. And health benefits.

      I have a difficulty enjoying sweets anymore. Coffee black, whiskey neat, beer at room temp.

    16. Re:That isn't advice by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I would rather bring my own coffee in a thermos, than be subjected to such a thing.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    17. Re:That isn't advice by Graydyn+Young · · Score: 1

      It gets better. I just punched this into a compounding interest calculator: $3 a day for 40 years at a modest 6% outputs $172,526.71. Enough to have a major impact on one's lifestyle in during retirement.

    18. Re:That isn't advice by Graydyn+Young · · Score: 1

      All those things that you mentioned would indeed fuck your life. But abstaining from Starbucks wouldn't, so I guess that's different huh?

    19. Re:That isn't advice by eth1 · · Score: 1

      This is advice. Financial advice

      You want advice. Live under a bridge. Eat nothing but potatoes, don't ever pay someone for something you can do yourself regardless of how long it takes you. Then you will truly be saving money.

      It's a fucked life, but hey, every dollar right?

      Extraneous recurring expenses are what will kill you financially. I make my own coffee, bring my lunch to work, mow my own yard, don't pay for cable, etc., because those costs add up massively over time. On the other hand, I have a very nice set of speakers for my home theater, because I can pay once, and enjoy them for a lifetime.

    20. Re:That isn't advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right! Got room under that bridge?? I just ran away from the wife and kids, noticed they were f*k expensive mon. They took all my cardboard boxes, those bridge trolls! Need a new one. Not gonna pay for it, cause money.

    21. Re:That isn't advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Companies vary; my last company initially did have coffee at work, but when the bottom line wasn't so great it was one of the first things to go. My current company does, but I'm a consultant now with a government client - which has no coffee (don't want to pass that expense on to the tax payers!). So in my experience at least, about half of my career has not provided coffee (or coke, or other similar benefits ...)

    22. Re:That isn't advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we get free espresso at work. it's very nice.

    23. Re:That isn't advice by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Your workplace doesn't supply the coffee for free to you? What kind of third-world hellhole do you live in?

      I don't know about that guy but I've worked places where they offered a coffee for free and yet personal coffee machines showed up... YMMV.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    24. Re:That isn't advice by FrankHaynes · · Score: 1

      Having clean clothes and showering every day gives you a massive increase in earning potential.

      EVERY day? EVERY SINGLE day?!?!

      --
      slashdot: A failed experiment.
    25. Re:That isn't advice by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Some people are just really picky with their coffee/tea. I like a good cup of well-brewed coffee, but I certainly don't mind strong-ass black as tar drip coffee, even cold. It's a nice reminder that life is bitter, and then you die.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    26. Re:That isn't advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, until you realize that, since you're writing in USD, many people need to save somewhere in the order of a million dollars over that time to be able to pay for retirement. In such a comparison, the $3 coffee is not such a big deal.

      Plus what's the big deal? You could make the same argument about going for a beer.

      For some people, the difference is huge. For others, it's miniscule. For example, let's say that you are paid not on salary, but hourly? Then sometimes paying other people to do stuff for you can definitely be worth it, economically speaking.

    27. Re:That isn't advice by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Never drink 'Pumpkin Ale'. It's almost as bad as can Bud.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    28. Re:That isn't advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It gets better. I just punched this into a compounding interest calculator: $3 a day for 40 years at a modest 6% outputs $172,526.71. Enough to have a major impact on one's lifestyle in during retirement.

      Not really. And certainly not 40 years form now.

      If you are willing to live an entire life of deprivation, you can indeed save a lot of money. But then again, if you can live a life of deprivation, you don't need that money anyway!

      Here's another conundrum - if everyone took this "smart" advice about living frugally and saving every penny, nobody would have a job!

      There is only room for a few parasites to work the system.

    29. Re:That isn't advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once worked at a place that charged for coffee. It was a small fee, like 25 cents to cover the cost of the cups and coffee and repairs to the machine and such. I doubt they made a profit on it, but I their lack of understanding was stupefying. Didn't they know that most places provide coffee and cola for free? Didn't they see how much they would have gained in employee goodwill by giving away the coffee? Didn't they realize how much of a productivity boost caffeine gives?

      I don't drink caffeinated beverages so I never asked these questions. It didn't really matter to me. But it was just the way things were, unexamined I guess.

      Some places provide free meals, some places don't. That's a culture thing. But a company that doesn't provide free coffee is just hobbling itself.

    30. Re:That isn't advice by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Paying $3 for a cup of coffee every morning for 40 years = $43,800

      $43800 in 40 years will be worth about $100 due to inflation. Is that worth spending 40 fucking years worrying about making coffee every single day?
      And what is the cumulative stress effect of counting coffee savings every single day for 40 years?

      This is advice. Financial advice.

      And it's pretty shit. Better advice would be to get a STEM education and never worry about the price of coffee again.

    31. Re:That isn't advice by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Having clean clothes and showering every day gives you a massive increase in earning potential.

      Now we're talking. And while we're talking given my current pay rate it is much more valuable to me to line up for coffee in the morning than make it myself given how much those 5minutes are worth.

      But that's just me, who knows maybe someone who's worth $400million actually makes money by working for free and thus can't afford coffee.

    32. Re:That isn't advice by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Well going to Starbucks would. As for abstaining from coffee? Heck yes it would. Not all of us drink it for the caffeine hit. Some of us do it purely for the wonderful taste.

      Hence the comparison with eating nothing but potatoes.

    33. Re:That isn't advice by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No poor financial planning is what will kill you financially. Doing something without the means is what will kill you financially. And that is kind of my point: Someone worth $400m just said to get rich skip on buying coffee. It's completely absurd financial advice that among other things ignores the time value of money.

      The subtext of your advice on the otherhand is sound. "Live within your means and watch that expenses don't creep up on you". The same reason I also don't subscribe to cable. I will however spend a small fortune on my food and drink, and that includes getting nicely made coffees from specialist cafes.

    34. Re:That isn't advice by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Your workplace doesn't supply the coffee for free to you? What kind of third-world hellhole do you live in?

      I don't know about that guy but I've worked places where they offered a coffee for free and yet personal coffee machines showed up... YMMV.

      Your kind of workplace supplied coffee bad enough that people brought their own machines in anyway? What kind of third-world hellhole do you live in?

    35. Re:That isn't advice by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      I check out my video entertainment from my library. I'm already paying for it, so there is no cost other than the three mile round trip to the bookmobile every Thursday evening. The library's movie catalog is far larger than what I can afford to buy, and better than what you can find on TV. I admit, there are disks that have scratches, but we leave them a note in the case, and get another copy later.

    36. Re:That isn't advice by geekmux · · Score: 1

      It gets better. I just punched this into a compounding interest calculator: $3 a day for 40 years at a modest 6% outputs $172,526.71. Enough to have a major impact on one's lifestyle in during retirement.

      Not really. And certainly not 40 years form now.

      If you are willing to live an entire life of deprivation, you can indeed save a lot of money. But then again, if you can live a life of deprivation, you don't need that money anyway!

      Here's another conundrum - if everyone took this "smart" advice about living frugally and saving every penny, nobody would have a job!

      There is only room for a few parasites to work the system.

      The financial advice is for the smart people who value it. Because of this, there is no "conundrum" to worry about, because there aren't that many smart people armed with common sense in the world. Starbucks revenue alone makes that very clear.

    37. Re:That isn't advice by geekmux · · Score: 1

      he said, while using an electronic device worth several thousand coffees

      My laptop enables me to perform my job, which has considerable value-add towards productivity.

      Other than caffeine addiction, (and perhaps diabetes based on Starbucks "coffee" drinks), coffee adds little or no actual value towards productivity, and creates a considerable financial impact over the long-term. Zombie coffee addicts would of course disagree ("I can't function without it!"), but there are millions of people who don't drink coffee that have no issues being productive.

    38. Re:That isn't advice by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Sure, until you realize that, since you're writing in USD, many people need to save somewhere in the order of a million dollars over that time to be able to pay for retirement. In such a comparison, the $3 coffee is not such a big deal.

      Plus what's the big deal? You could make the same argument about going for a beer.

      For some people, the difference is huge. For others, it's miniscule. For example, let's say that you are paid not on salary, but hourly? Then sometimes paying other people to do stuff for you can definitely be worth it, economically speaking.

      Extend my 40-year estimate to 50 years or more, which is the more likely length of a working career.

      $3 a day for 40 years at 6% interest compounded annually works out to over $160,000 Extend that to 50 years, and it works out to over $310,000.

      And that's just eliminating one expense (coffee) from your life. Do that two more times, and you've made a million just cutting extra expenses. That's not including what you could also save from contributing more towards a retirement plan from working.

    39. Re:That isn't advice by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Paying $3 for a cup of coffee every morning for 40 years = $43,800

      $43800 in 40 years will be worth about $100 due to inflation. Is that worth spending 40 fucking years worrying about making coffee every single day? And what is the cumulative stress effect of counting coffee savings every single day for 40 years?

      Saving $3 a day for 40 years at 6% interest compounded annually works out to over $160,000. Extend that to 50 years (a more realistic career length), and it works out to over $310,000.

      This is advice. Financial advice.

      And it's pretty shit. Better advice would be to get a STEM education and never worry about the price of coffee again.

      The best job in the world isn't worth dick if you fail to understand the value of saving and investing. Plenty of lottery winners, ex-celebrities, and sports stars are dead-ass broke today, and they earned a lot more than any STEM job.

    40. Re:That isn't advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      coffee adds little or no actual value towards productivity

      Speak for yourself! :)

      The first coffee house in Europe opened in Rome in 1645. Then what happened? The Enlightenment, the Industrial Revolution, global trade, Europeans colonized the world. Coincidence??

    41. Re:That isn't advice by gachunt · · Score: 1

      I work for government. Taxpayers tend to not want to pay for such "perks".

    42. Re:That isn't advice by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Right, because taking the advice to its extreme is the lesson here. No, no, no...if that's what you think, then you're not listening.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    43. Re:That isn't advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paying $3 for a cup of coffee every morning for 40 years = $43,800

      Paying 20 cents for a cup of coffee every morning for 40 years = $2,920

      That's a difference of over $40 thousand dollars.

      Problem is you don't have $40,000 at the beginning of the 40 years. That's at the end.

      Kind of the same problem with "investing" in a college education. If you have $100,000 at age 18, then it's a legitimate question to see if it' sbetter to spend it on an education or invest it and work at lower-paying jobs.

      If you don't have the money it doesn't really matter. /* At the end of your life, just think how much you'd have saved if you didn't 'waste' money on rent or vehicles. */

      Lottery tickets and cups of coffee aren't investments--they are entertainments, very cheap ones, especially if they succeed in entertaining you.

    44. Re:That isn't advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people like to have a reason to leave the office. For example, I brown bag my lunch, but will catch a ride with someone getting take out just to take a breather out of the office. I'll buy a cookie or a beverage or something sometimes on the trip.

    45. Re:That isn't advice by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Saving $3 a day for 40 years at 6% interest compounded annually works out to over $160,000.

      Good, good. you know some basic maths. Now tell me what interest rates have been for each of the last last 40 years, compared to inflation and cross reference that against the averages cup of coffee, and add in all the side effects of 40 years of never drinking coffee, being looked at weirdly by friends and co-workers and all the other soft implications of behaving like a tight ass?

      The best job in the world isn't worth dick if you fail to understand the value of saving and investing.

      Yes it is, because even if you blow everything you have you've probably had a good life. Unlike a weirdo who won't spend a penny on anything.
      "I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered." - George Best

    46. Re:That isn't advice by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      If public sector jobs didn't offer free coffee here, I think most people would consider it a human rights violation.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    47. Re:That isn't advice by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Well we're talking purely financial advice. Since the GP ignored any benefit or joy gained from drinking a lovely prepared coffee in a nice cafe then I guess we should ignore that for everything else too. Then it becomes a money game.

      Yay potatoes. You can live entirely on them.

    48. Re:That isn't advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think that Keurig.... chair, lightbulb .... anything is "free" so long as it isn't accounted for on you pay stub?

      WRONG. It's basically the same psychological concept as SBUX except in house & more loyalty bonus value for supplier --> the consumers fool themselves into believing it's FREE and HERE!

      Truth is, it cuts into your companies bottom-line, and the companies bottom-line matters how much you get paid, or if you have a job at all!

      Sounds like you've been had! Just as the shareholders, board, and executives desired :) We thank you for your mindless service & financial illiteracy!
      See you tomorrow, oh and this flavor is GREAT!

  4. Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    So the man doesn't go out to eat at all? All restaurants and cafes and whatnot all have prices that inflated. I have a feeling he still eats out a lot and is nothing more than another hypocrite.

    1. Re:Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't go out to eat at all - I can't afford to. Don't drink anything other than tea and water too.

    2. Re:Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the man doesn't go out to eat at all?

      Who goes out to eat everyday? Starbucks = 2 to 4 bucks every day.

    3. Re:Lol by bondsbw · · Score: 2

      I volunteered at a local non-profit coffee shop. All volunteer labor, costs passed on to the customer.

      Across the board the prices were around 30% - 60% of Starbucks. I was actually surprised it was that high and doesn't mesh with the idea that Starbucks makes 95% profit. If we paid everyone, the prices wouldn't have been much better than Starbucks (maybe worse), and that's still with no profit.

      Capital costs represent a very large percentage of costs passed on to consumers, as usual with any restaurant.

      I found a better breakdown of coffee shop costs, which concludes:

      What’s the lesson here? Certainly it’s that you’re paying for a lot more than the coffee when you choose to buy from a coffee shop. . . .

      But, when you buy a Cappuccino Grande, you’re mostly paying for the privilege of enjoying it in a coffee shop.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    4. Re:Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is a blowhard who dipped his toes in politics here in Canada and found out his loud mouth wasn't good enough to get people to like him, and he didn't speak French. Kind of big hole in your resume when you are running for the leader of a national party in Canada. You would think someone of his ilk would've seen that from miles away but I guess he thought, like a lot of wealthy business people, that people will just do what you want because you are rich. Not this time O'Leary.

    5. Re:Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends on where he eats and what purpose he eats for.

      Typically entree food at average-priced restaurants is 2x - 4x what it would cost for you to make it at home. Appetizers, desserts, and beer/wine/liquor are 6x - 10x.

      $2.50 for a cup of coffee is > 10x, and with prices hitting the $5 - $7.50 range for some of the more exotic combinations it's more like 20x - 30x.

      But I bet he expenses a lot of his meals since (at $1bn+) he's probably more of a consultant at this point than anything else.

    6. Re:Lol by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      This. People wildly misunderstand the cost of overhead in an operation like Starbucks. They also think that a $5.00 single-scoop ice cream cone is making that shop owner rich.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    7. Re:Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its because of the regulations involved in having a shop.

      In asia this morning, I was sipping (overpriced) usd0.50 3-in-1 white coffee with hot water and ice.
      Dude was sitting on a curb, stuff on the floor with metal 1.5meter umbrella. Hot water boiled on a stove with a 3kg canister beside it.

      He did not have : city permit food permit, osha and other safety, no scheduled waste management, no working toilets within 50meters (drain 10m away tho) and all the other things that starbucks or your non profit shop had.

      All it had, was the lack of employee wages.

    8. Re: Lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not eating out is part of the message. For ten years I had ate every meal at fast food. I spent on average 8 to 15 dollars per meal. I gained a ton of weight and wasted a ton of money. 365 days per year Ã-- 10$ Ã-- 3 meals per day Ã-- 10 years = 109500. So I likely wasted 50k. That does not include the 3 mountain dew bottles I purchased at 1.25$ every day.

    9. Re:Lol by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Hackaday did an investigation of Asian street coffee. Specifically in Vietnam.

      Some of it is 0% coffee.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re:Lol by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't speaking Quebicie be better? Speaking correct frog isn't going to get you any votes there.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  5. It only costs 18 cents if... by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 2

    It only costs 18 cents if your time is worth nothing. Way faster to go out of your way and wait in line at SBUX. /s

    --
    the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
    1. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by kiviQr · · Score: 2

      If you add time to get a coffee from a shop the saving is even bigger. Making coffee takes similar time for me and for barista. Add time for payment, waiting in line, going to coffee shop - that is easily additional 15 min. Your coffee costs at least $20 + 2.50 in time and money.

    2. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by Dzimas · · Score: 1

      There's absolutely no way it's quicker and cheaper for me to go out of my way to a Starbucks instead of making it myself. I dropped by Starbucks this morning and the trip added about 20 minutes to my morning commute, and it cost me $5.25 for a Grande. Had I made a mug at home like I usually do, it would have taken me a couple of minutes at most (I just have to set the machine going while I'm herding teenagers and getting ready) and cost $0.25.

      So, yeah. That single Grande cost me about $30.

    3. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by war4peace · · Score: 2

      Can't you guys just order ahead of time? Pick up the phone, order this and that coffee, then either go get it directly or have it delivered. Pay through an app on the phone or whatever.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    4. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      My experience is similar. My coffee drips while I dress, and I don't wait in line or swipe a card. I make a pot, not just one cup, so I can refill my cup practically for free. I pick up fresh coffee beans or grounds when I buy the rest of my groceries, or I order online for home delivery. Going to a coffee shop costs time and money. So, why would someone go to a coffeeshop? Because they enjoy the experience somehow. They enjoy interacting with other customers and the "dirty hippie". Who know, the barista might be the present day equivalent of the taxi driver giving out stock market tips.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    5. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 2

      Most national coffee shop chains allow you to order & pay using their app, then you walk in (or drive thru) & pick it up. Hell, most of the McDonald's in my area now allow mobile ordering/payment.

      I'm pretty sure the one-off/mom-and-pop coffeehouses take orders over the phone at least.

    6. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      LOL. Just pop a Jet-Alert pill. That's effectively .04 cents per 100mg pill of caffeine. DONE!!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    7. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by godrik · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? It takes 2 minutes to make coffee. The time to go to starbucks is more than the time to make coffee.
      (And you'll get better coffee.)

      What he is really saying is that he does not drink coffee out of home. And provided the shit they serve you for coffee in chain store nowadays, I can't say I blame him.

    8. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by godrik · · Score: 1

      > So, why would someone go to a coffeeshop?

      The reason I used to is because I am not at home next to my coffee machine every day.

      > Because they enjoy the experience somehow.

      Well, getting coffee could also be your leg-stretching time of the day.

    9. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      I dropped by Starbucks this morning and the trip added about 20 minutes to my morning commute, and it cost me $5.25 for a Grande. Had I made a mug at home like I usually do it would have taken me a couple of minutes at most ... and cost $0.25.

      and... You wouldn't have had to use the word "grande" - for a medium even though the word means "large" in most languages.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    10. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by Oswald+McWeany · · Score: 1

      LOL. Just pop a Jet-Alert pill. That's effectively .04 cents per 100mg pill of caffeine. DONE!!

      Wouldn't work for me. I actually don't experience any effect from caffeine*, I actually frequently drink a cup of coffee right before bed because the warm drink helps me get ready to sleep like some drink a cup of warm milk when they were kids. I drink coffee because I like coffee- not because I want caffeine.

      *I suspect a lot of people's caffeine experience is psychosomatic anyway. Give them a cup of decaf and not tell them and besides the nasty taste, they wouldn't notice a difference and "act" more alert.

      --
      "That's the way to do it" - Punch
    11. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then why did you stop if you know this?
       
      And what grande costs you 5.25 at Starbucks that you can make for a quarter at home? Please provide details, I'm almost certain that you're dead wrong. Since you calculated in a ton of factors to get to 30 dollars from a 5.25 purchase you're obviously not including those costs when you are talking about your 0.25 cup of coffee from home.
       
      By the way, what was the "cost" of your posting to Slashdot? What value did you really get out of it?

    12. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? It takes 2 minutes to make coffee.

      No, it takes 2 minutes to make whatever the hell you think is coffee. You want to compare to something nice from a coffee shop? There's no home machine that can even achieve its warm up cycle in 2 minutes, let alone someone who can make a nice latte in that time.

      Don't compare brewed coffee with white shit poured in it from the fridge to nicely made espressos and frothed milk.

    13. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you so butt hurt? Have you spent a fortune at Starbucks and now resent people who haven't?

    14. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes about 1 minute to scoop grounds and fill my coffee maker with water. it's scheduled to brew in the morning. I have fresh brewed coffee each morning and it's not the burned over priced shit that SBUX selling.

      You've been in line for 20 minutes, still waiting for your coffee and paid enough money on one drink to pay for my coffee for 2 weeks and I'm nearly to work, caffeinated and ready to go. I win, you lose.

    15. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      There's no home machine that can even achieve its warm up cycle in 2 minutes

      Sure, but I'm not going to sit next to the coffee machine waiting for it to warm up. I cook my breakfast, pack my bag, fix my hair, check my e-mail or a half dozen other things, and in the meantime make a cup of coffee.

    16. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still have to drive there, and wait for them to give you the coffee. And to be fair I've tried ordering a head at places that offer it, and usually they cook my stuff when I get there. So I may not wait in line to order and pay, but I'm still waiting for my darn food.

    17. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      There's no home machine that can even achieve its warm up cycle in 2 minutes

      Just what the fuck is your coffee machine warming up? A good kettle will boil a litre of water in 2 minutes, my coffee machine only heats the water in its pipes. It can heat the water as it flows through them, as fast as it drips it through the coffee.

      2 minutes? Shit, 40 seconds.

    18. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would agree with the leg-stretching part if it weren't for the fact that the only walking anybody does is from their car to the store entrance (if they don't just skip that and "stand in line" at the drive-through).

      As for "go to the coffeeshop" - really, it's a social thing not just getting coffee. As others have noted, it's stupidly expensive, really, to get takeout from a coffee place (order a "senior coffee" at McD if that's all you want, as long as you look to be of a certain age). Coffeeshops have been around as social places for hundreds of years, and will remain until climate change kills off the coffee (or makes robusta the only beans to survive [shudder]. You're paying, really, for the experience and the coffee is incidental. Much like going to a bar (it's far cheaper to drink at home if your only purpose is getting drunk, with far less opportunity for unpleasant interactions).

    19. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Actually, at my hourly rate, it costs me about $0.50 to make a pot of coffee in labor time. Spread across 5 cups, that knocks the price up to $0.23 per cup, which definitely makes waiting in line at Starbucks far cheaper and more efficient.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    20. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enough about quality of Starbucks coffee. I drank coffee all-over NE Pa while driving as a teen back in-the-day. The coffee those pie-N-turkey diners provide just sucked. So did the coffee served at pals and girlfriends homes. Lousy weak bitter brew. Same with institutional coffee all over Pa. Workers brew ... home brew ... shit-brew. No fern-bar or big-city brewskis for me. Fast Fward !! My first cup-a-SB in California 1982 was the best coffee I ever had in my life. Most folks I met said the same. Who-the-fuck drank decent coffee before Starbucks ? Noone I ever knew except some wealthy cunt-lapping city slickers from NYC.

    21. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by naris · · Score: 1

      Actually, you are more likely to spend more time waiting in line @ SBUX then it take to make the coffee at home. Also, you can make the coffee while getting ready to leave, so a net of no time could be spent "making the coffee" (especially if you have one of those coffee pots with a timer)

    22. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by FrankHaynes · · Score: 1

      Can't you guys just order ahead of time? Pick up the phone, order this and that coffee, then either go get it directly or have it delivered.

      Idea: start a service that actually drinks your coffee for you.

      --
      slashdot: A failed experiment.
    23. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read the comment I've replied to it's pretty clear that I'm not the one who's butthurt here. Nor am I making up random numbers to prove some point to what is really a non-issue to any sane human being.

    24. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Add time for payment, waiting in line, going to coffee shop - that is easily additional 15 min.

      How far out of the way do you go?? I sometimes stop off at one of the many coffee shops I walk literally past the front door of on the way to work. Paying takes about 5 or 6 seconds with the kind of contactless card everyone here has. The queue is rarely more than a minute, because they all have plenty of staff for the morning rush.

      It's only ever a few minutes to get.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    25. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Thanks for missing the point. It still takes you longer to physically work at your coffee machine than it does to go order a coffee at a cafe. Unless you make poor decisions on the choice of cafe ... or don't clean your machine after in which case ... eww.

    26. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      my coffee machine only heats the water in its pipes.

      We're talking about buying a coffee from a cafe. Please don't compare a nice espresso to whatever the heck you think qualifies as "coffee" from your mud machine.

    27. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      My mud machine makes a very nice espresso directly from roast coffee beans, which means it's nicer than the coffee from a cafe because I buy nicer beans.

      That's what I think qualifies as "coffee". But you still haven't explained why you have such an inefficient water heater.

    28. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      But you still haven't explained why you have such an inefficient water heater.

      Because inefficient is often better when it comes to thermal mass, and thermal mass ensures more constant water temperature and constant water temperature is what you need for espressos instead of mud. But you can google that one, especially why no machine worth it's salt actually warms up quickly and why the nicer machines sure as hell don't have a heatpump.

      As for the being nicer than cafe's because you buy nice beans... Yeah I am starting to see what kind of establishments you frequent (or rather don't frequent). Let me guess, it's better than Starbucks so that makes it awesome espresso? Yeah right.

    29. Re:It only costs 18 cents if... by Cederic · · Score: 1

      thermal mass ensures more constant water temperature and constant water temperature is what you need for espressos

      Constant water temperature for 40mm of water isn't exactly fucking rocket science. Although my machine will provide constant water temperature for a lungo, which is what I generally drink.

      the nicer machines sure as hell don't have a heatpump

      No, they have a thermoblock (like my machine), a heat exchanger or dual boilers.

      When you're making two coffees a day a thermoblock is actually the better choice. It's more energy efficient, perfectly capable of producing consistent temperatures and doesn't take half a fucking hour to heat up.

      It also means I don't have to pay $6000 for a coffee machine that wont fit into my kitchen just to get dual boilers.

      I am starting to see what kind of establishments you frequent (or rather don't frequent).

      Well, I could hunt down gourmet coffee venues in England but the two hours to drive to the nearest one means my coffee's going to be pretty fucking cold by the time I get home.

      Let me guess, it's better than Starbucks so that makes it awesome espresso?

      It's not hard to make black coffee (of any form) that's nicer than Starbucks. But I've posted elsewhere here that I do like Starbucks lattes. I'm not a fucking snob, I don't need coffee hand picked by virgins, roasted by warrior monks and brewed by a barista wearing a tutu and a bushy beard. If it tastes nice, I'm happy.

      Clearly you fit into that 0.03% of coffee drinkers that can even fucking tell the difference between a good filter coffee and that bearded virgin monk gourmet shit. I can't.

    30. Re: It only costs 18 cents if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I make a gallon of cold brew a week. It takes less than five minutes to make, and 10 minutes the next day to strain. After that it is seconds to pour into my to-go container in the morning, costs me $8 total a week for grounds, and a few cents for the water. The flavor is insanely consistent week-to-week. The one-time investment was $20 for the two glass jars, and $3 for the re-usable filter.

  6. This is a lie by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And a pretty easily proven one. He's talking about $850 a year. That's not going to make or break anyone's investment portfolio. It's like that schmuck in Australia who told the young uns the could afford a house in Sydney if only they'd give up avocado toast. It's nonsense the aristocracy tells it's workers to excuse stagnant and falling wages. Don't fall for it.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But $2.50 is a ridiculous price. I pay $1.20 cdn

    2. Re: This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $850 a year is $10K after 10 years.

      In 10 years do you think poor people would be better off with $10K, or with the warm and fuzzy knowledge of realizing they spent $10K on coffee over the past decade?

    3. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      $850 added to an investment account each year for 50 years with interest is: $387,956. Pretty sure that amount might actually make or break someone's retirement.

    4. Re:This is a lie by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how you get to $850. Assuming one cup a day, it's $913/year. Assuming only week days, it's $652/year. Assuming two cups per week day, it's $1,300. $1,300/year is a sizeable chunk of change, particularly since a lot of businesses will happily install a coffee machine and pay for beans if it saves them lost productivity from people popping out to buy coffee.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:This is a lie by Baron_Yam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you're relatively poor but buy a coffee everyday... I guarantee you you're poor because of poor financial decisions and not because of circumstances beyond your control. And, if my blue-collar work experience has taught me anything, you probably also spend too much on tobacco, alcohol, and lottery tickets.

      As I've progressed in my career, I actually do find myself exercising MORE restraint with regards to purchases, not less... even though I now have more money than I ever really seriously thought I would.

      I realized there's nothing wrong with 'brown bagging' it, nothing wrong with used cars, clothing without fancy brand logos on it, etc. I find conspicuous consumption offensively stupid.

      The result of this behaviour is that I haven't built up debt, and have paid off the 'unavoidable' debts a lot sooner than most, and now I live fairly comfortably and I'm not particularly stressed about finances. And because I'm not in debt, the money I earn is effectively worth more as I'm not bleeding interest payments to the bank.

      $850 a year is a LOT of money if you keep rolling it into bonds and you're patient. It might mean helping your kid get through college without crippling debt, or maybe loaning them a down payment on a house.

    6. Re:This is a lie by mark-t · · Score: 2

      $2.20/cup - $0.18/cup = $2.22/cup, multiplied by 1 cup/day times 365 days per year = $846.80 saved vs going to Starbucks each day.

    7. Re:This is a lie by mark-t · · Score: 1

      (excuse the typos.... the final answer is right, however)

    8. Re:This is a lie by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Question is: had you ever have fun in your life?
      Look, I'm not saying you're doing it wrong. But don't you say I'm doing it wrong either.
      I'd rather have my fun now, thank you, even if that means not saving as much as you do, or not being as cheap as you are.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    9. Re:This is a lie by gwjc · · Score: 1

      In the article Ali Montag ends it with a mention of the $7 Avocado Toast money too. But yeah, Kevin O'Leary is a wine connoisseur and also keeps an extensive collection of artisanal olive oils.

    10. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your idea of fun is a little coffee with your pound of sugar, you might want to stop buying coffee and spend that money on therapy.

      Seriously, you do bring up a good point. Insist poor people live like self-sacrificing monks, and sooner or later they'll make really stupid decisions, because fuck everything.

      Surviving is not the same as living.

    11. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've never had to care for an aging parent, have you. I can tell, because (for ONE thing) you have no Earthly clue how much it costs to find a reliable person to wipe your bottom when you can't do it anymore.

      But you run along, honey. Have "fun", and whatever you do, don't trouble yourself with thoughts about how your're going to live through your 70's , 80's and 90's and beyond.

    12. Re:This is a lie by Baron_Yam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is a difference between 'cheap' and 'frugal'. I don't spend money on stupid things. You know how rich people get rich? By getting people like you to be brand loyal and buy their stuff just because of the logo on it.

      I buy what I need, when I need it, and of a quality that will last as long as I expect to need it for... without regard for who made it or who is selling it except when I'm weighing the value of a warranty.

      So instead of a new BMW, some Nike shoes, a closet of Polo shirts, and a Starbucks coffee every day. I'm not blowing hundreds of dollars at a shot to get a lousy seat at a concert when the music's better on my home sound system. And no, I don't see every new movie in the theatres when I can wait and see them at home for a fraction of the cost.

      I can go on vacations more frequently (and still be putting some money away for potential large future expenses). I can turn down overtime at work and spend more time with friends and family. If I have an unexpected expense, I can cover it.

      >I'd rather have my fun now, thank you, even if that means not saving as much as you do

      If your idea of 'fun' is living paycheque to paycheque... with a base load on your credit cards... OK. But a little short term restraint means you have less stress and more options in the long term.

    13. Re:This is a lie by Kohath · · Score: 2

      It's like that schmuck in Australia who told the young uns the could afford a house in Sydney if only they'd give up avocado toast. It's nonsense the aristocracy tells it's workers to excuse stagnant and falling wages. Don't fall for it.

      Self control and delayed gratification lead to economic success. Avocado toast isn't a significant factor, but the idea of taking control of your spending and your life by saying no to avocado toast is the lesson to learn.

      It's nonsense the aristocracy tells it's workers to excuse stagnant and falling wages. Don't fall for it.

      Waiting for someone else to solve your wage problems is a good way to make sure your wage problems never get solved. Telling people to wait for some magic answer from others is just wrong. If people listen to that advice, they're losing 99% of their opportunity for improvement.

    14. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I follow the OPs advice. I make plenty (though I work in healthcare, not IT). I bring my lunch everyday, make my coffee at home, have never bought a new car, I wear my clothes for years, etc. etc.

      I spend my money on camping, caving, rock climbing and nice concerts. None are extremely expensive. Buying fancy stuff to impress people you don't care about it is idiotic.

    15. Re:This is a lie by geekmux · · Score: 1

      And a pretty easily proven one. He's talking about $850 a year. That's not going to make or break anyone's investment portfolio. It's like that schmuck in Australia who told the young uns the could afford a house in Sydney if only they'd give up avocado toast. It's nonsense the aristocracy tells it's workers to excuse stagnant and falling wages. Don't fall for it.

      Paying $3 for a cup of coffee every morning for 40 years = $43,800

      Paying 20 cents for a cup of coffee every morning for 40 years = $2,920

      That's a difference of over $40 thousand dollars. It's a hell of a lot more than that if you took that money and invested it over a 40-year span.

      Hell, $40K is about $40K more than the average Starbucks-addicted Millennial has saved up for retirement.

      Wake up and smell the math.

    16. Re:This is a lie by ranton · · Score: 1

      While I agree it is nonsense for the wealthy to tell people they are only poor because they dare to have any indulgences in their life, $850 per year can be a significant amount of investment for most people. $850 per year put into an index fund over a 45 year career would likely turn into close to $150,000 in inflation adjusted dollars by retirement ($350k in today's dollars). That is nearly the median amount current retirees have saved for retirement (about $170k).

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    17. Re:This is a lie by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      >. Insist poor people live like self-sacrificing monks, and sooner or later they'll make really stupid decisions, because fuck everything.

      I think hope is a big part of the problem (combined with the general human difficulty dealing with risk/reward judgements and delayed gratification). If you can't see a practical chance for improving your circumstances in the long run, you focus on the short term improvements even if those choices are the very ones undermining your long-term opportunities.

      Then there are people who go the other way, so focused on the long term that they forget their lifespan is finite; there's no point in saving for the future once you've made sure your children (if any) are OK... because you don't HAVE a future. You're going to die.

      Enjoy the fruits of your labour while you can. Just don't enjoy so much you end up with a net negative to your life in the long run, that's all.

    18. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For some people that's a monthly mortgage payment or close to it.

    19. Re:This is a lie by mrun4982 · · Score: 2

      Stop being so close minded. It's not just the coffee runs. It's everything. Cable TV packages, expensive cars, etc. Having that attitude and applying it to everything in life makes a huge difference in how much money you have. BTW, if you think $850 a year is nothing, I'll be happy to take it that much off your hands every year and invest it for myself.

    20. Re:This is a lie by WrongMonkey · · Score: 1

      Want fun in your life? Think about this: With some shopping around, $850 will pay for two round-trip airline tickets to just about anywhere in the world. I'm not quite as frugal as Baron Yam claims to be, but I'd rather spend on memorable, meaningful experiences than daily hum-drum routine.

    21. Re:This is a lie by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Suicide is always an option, at least where euthanasia is illegal.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    22. Re:This is a lie by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      I would say there isn't anything wrong with funding a bit of luxury in your life so long as it isn't preventing you from preparing for a future. When I was a young adult practically all of my friends spent 100% of their paychecks every week, and frequently more. I wasn't quite as bad about spending on frivolities, but I still managed to not save much at all. In my 30's I finally started saving for an eventual retirement and got my finances straightened out pretty well. So while I'm on track now I'm a decade behind where I could easily have been.

      When I think back the one place where I really wasted incredible amounts of money was eating out at restaurants constantly. While doing that was fun, I mostly did it out of laziness. Eating out for lunch every workday was costing me around $3000 a year. That is a crazy amount of money to spend to avoid a couple minutes of food prep a day. And that isn't even considering what I spend on dinners and weekends.

      The last time I got together with a bunch of my friends there was only one other guy who had his finances together. Everyone else was just kind of getting by paycheck to paycheck. And trust me they're not exactly living it up in the moment. I've got a retirement plan and when I reach those goals I'll be done with this day job garbage. My friends will likely be working until they're in a grave or incapacitated, at which time hopefully some family member will be able to care for or support them.

      You don't have to save every penny and live a life of sworn poverty, like my parents did. But going full yolo with personal finances is a great way to end up destitute sooner, rather than later. You have to find a middle ground of some kind.

    23. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I've progressed in my career, I actually do find myself exercising MORE restraint with regards to purchases, not less... even though I now have more money than I ever really seriously thought I would.

      I realized there's nothing wrong with 'brown bagging' it, nothing wrong with used cars, clothing without fancy brand logos on it, etc. I find conspicuous consumption offensively stupid.

      Agreed, I find that while it's fun to have a few luxuries when it comes to everything else I'd rather be frugal. Even on the things I splurge on like luxury cars I still buy them used and keep them for a decade rather than leasing something new every few years. I also live in a much smaller house than I could actually afford as I prefer to put the extra money into retirement and go on a nice vacation every year rater than have extra rooms that just collect dust. I like to cook as well and prefer to only go out for dinner when it's for something that I'm not skilled at preparing or to a nice restaurant that will be doing the dish better than I'd have the patience for.

    24. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's talking about $850 a year. That's not going to make or break anyone's investment portfolio.

      Actually it will break anyone's investment portfolio. When you get into the habit of allowing your finances to be nickled and dimed to death, you don't have a portfolio. Overpaying for coffee by claiming your time is more important than the $2.50 conditions you to continue overpaying for items thinking that your time is worth more. Eventually, your continued overpayment for small purchases will make yo a slave to the job you thought was freeing your time for a cup of coffee.

    25. Re:This is a lie by war4peace · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I don't spend money on stupid things"
      How do you tell thing A is stupid and thing B isn't? Let me tell you: you weigh it against your beliefs. So there you go: that 2.5 dollar coffee is stupid to you (and to me too) but is not stupid to the one buying it. And you can't tell them it's stupid because your opinion has equal value to theirs.

      "So instead of a new BMW, some Nike shoes, a closet of Polo shirts, and a Starbucks coffee every day" - the phrase doesn't end but I get your point. And here's what: all those are valueless to me too, but I'm not going to tell anyone who buys them that "it's stupid". They would tell me that the hardware I bought for my PCs is stupidly expensive - and they would be right, from their point of view.

      What I meant is that there are two extremes:
      1. Spending all your money on stuff
      and
      2. Spending none of your money on stuff.

      The idea is to find some middle ground, try not to get into either of the extremes, and you'll end up having a good life. I've seen people reaching each of those extremes, and believe me it's sad either way. I'm currently recovering from #1 and slowly finding middle ground, it's a battle, trust me. Mostly because of my chronic depression which pushes me really hard to get the happiness fix through buying. I've been a slave to that for many years, it sucks. But it also sucks to not enjoy life at all because all you do is save, save, save.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    26. Re:This is a lie by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Nobody said anything about fancy stuff. I just disagree with the other extreme which is "save MORE" as a mantra.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    27. Re:This is a lie by war4peace · · Score: 1

      There you go, a perfect alternative way to spend that money.
      Still, according tot he OP, you're not saving them which is equally bad.
      Shame on you for wasting perfectly good $850 which you could have saved! :)

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    28. Re:This is a lie by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

      It's like that schmuck in Australia who told the young uns the could afford a house in Sydney if only they'd give up avocado toast. It's nonsense the aristocracy tells it's workers to excuse stagnant and falling wages. Don't fall for it.

      Or, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) who reportedly said in a November 29 interview:

      “I think not having the estate tax recognizes the people that are investing,” Grassley said, “as opposed to those that are just spending every darn penny they have, whether it’s on booze or women or movies.”

      Or, another Republican congressman justified a vote on ACA repeal by saying Americans would be able to afford health security, without assistance, by giving up “getting that new iPhone.”

      It's nice when rich people who had rich parents give us common folk advise on how to pull ourselves up by our own bootstraps - you know, like they did. (I'm sure Trump would have turned out the same without that first $1M loan and subsequent $14M loan from his father.)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    29. Re:This is a lie by chispito · · Score: 1

      He's talking about $850 a year. That's not going to make or break anyone's investment portfolio... It's nonsense the aristocracy tells it's workers to excuse stagnant and falling wages. Don't fall for it.

      One of the ways people get rich is by recognizing good and bad investments--ostensibly what Shark Tank is about. For a coffee lover, a $6-8 bag of coffee is a good investment. A $2-5 cup of coffee is a bad investment.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    30. Re:This is a lie by chispito · · Score: 1

      Question is: had you ever have fun in your life? Look, I'm not saying you're doing it wrong. But don't you say I'm doing it wrong either. I'd rather have my fun now, thank you, even if that means not saving as much as you do, or not being as cheap as you are.

      Ask him again in ten years. Then twenty. Then thirty.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    31. Re:This is a lie by Pulzar · · Score: 1

      If your idea of 'fun' is living paycheque to paycheque... with a base load on your credit cards... OK.

      So instead of a new BMW, some Nike shoes, a closet of Polo shirts, and a Starbucks coffee every day. I'm not blowing hundreds of dollars at a shot to get a lousy seat at a concert when the music's better on my home sound system. And no, I don't see every new movie in the theatres when I can wait and see them at home for a fraction of the cost.

      There's a big differences between spending some of your money on experiences and what you describe above. It's a fine thing to set the bar at "don't load up your credit cards", but beyond that, we all choose what experiences we value and what we spend money on.

      You are spending your money on vacations, on high quality home sound systems, and TVs so you can watch movies and listen to music at home. To each their own, though -- many people could argue that spending money on a TV is a "stupid thing", as you call it. For the price of a decent TV, I can go to the movies with my wife over 30 times and have a much better experience. I can't even begin to compare a good concert experience vs. listening to music at home... Driving a BMW is also a decidedly different experience from driving a Corolla, and some might choose to spend their money there.

      Don't judge people for having different preferences from your own.

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
    32. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last December I took a 15-day trip with a friend to Belize, where we rented an amazing house for the first five days, lived it up, visited the caye's, and then rode the busses to every corner of the country, explored caves and ruins, met great people, and returned home thrilled and refreshed. When I added up the total bill for everything including transportation from New York, it came to about $1600 per person. For perspective, you save that much in two years just through making your own coffee. And yeah, it's worth it.

      I know this story is a bit off topic, but it was triggered by your posting about how you doubt that someone who refuses to splurge for coffee can have fun. Yes, people who aren't willing to spend money on fun are either truly poor or truly lost. Some of my best experiences did cost me money. But no matter how rich you are, it's still worth trying to optimize how much fun your money buys you. Standing in line at Starbucks for the privilege of paying $2.50 for a coffee should not be high on anyone's list.

    33. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I came to a similar conclusion a while back, in my early 20s, and started focusing on the luxuries I wanted instead of the ones I could do without. I did some quick calculations and figured many of my peers were spending over $500/year on coffee, $1000/year on cigarettes, over $100/year on lottery, etc, maybe another grand on alcohol. Over time that kind of thing adds up.

      I tended to avoid most of those - not smoking, not gambling, rarely drinking, and found I could afford to take a remote vacation every year and sometimes still put some money in the bank, while making near minimum wage.

      About a year ago I sat down with a friend who was struggling financially and, with the help of a spreadsheet, showed them that they could save about $6,000/year just by using some moderation with habits like coffee, drinks for parties, eating out, etc. They can still go out and have fun, just as more of a treat rather than a weekly thing.

      The little stuff adds up.

    34. Re:This is a lie by green1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which just shows you've missed the point entirely. It's actually not about the coffee, it's about priorities. People who say "it's only $2.50" or even who add it up for a year and say "it's only $850", are likely doing the exact same thing with more small purchases as well, how many "only $2.50" items before you get to actual numbers that you do care about?

      The Coffee is just an indicator of a mind-set. Every dollar you don't spend helps you. They all add up.

      I'm not saying don't spend money on things that make you happy, just think about it first. Which will make you happier, $2.50 every day on a cup of coffee? or $850 once a year on a slightly bigger purchase? or $10,000 once a decade on an even bigger purchase? or $50,000 extra in retirement? Multiply this times all the little "treats" you give yourself and you can likely find some much bigger numbers than just the coffee too.

      I never drank coffee, but I did used to buy lunch out every work day. I realized I could save over $200 a month by packing a lunch from home. I still eat out on occasion, but it's not the routine any more. I'm no less happy during the work day as eating out wasn't a special treat, but just a routine occurence, but I can use that $200 on all sorts of other things that I know will actually contribute to my happiness. And that mindset flows through everything I spend money on. Thinking that way has allowed me to pay off my mortgage when I was 30, take several nice vacations overseas, buy a fancy car, and still be well set up for my future retirement, all on an income half of what some of my friends make who are still living paycheque to paycheque with no more to show for it. Now when I do eat out it's not just a daily occurrence any more, and that makes it a bit more special, so it does actually contribute to my happiness.

    35. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $850 will pay for two round-trip airline tickets to just about anywhere in the world.

      You don't travel much, do you?

    36. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sort of disagree. It is difficult to be poor, and long term poverty would be tough. That said though, people still should learn to make realistic decisions financially. If one is poor, then perhaps expecting deluxe coffee at a deluxe shop every day is not realistic until one has better finances. And one way to better finances is to take the 3-5 dollars that would have been spent on the barista's wares and instead save it in an interest bearing account. Just my humble opinion and yes, I did spend time with very little cash - I even had to food bank it - but at the same time I learned how to be inventive in many ways. At the same time, even many well to do people refuse to go to these shops everyday, as it's a very expensive habit to be buying coffee at 3 and 4 dollars a cup. So no one is really entitled, per se, to these deluxe coffee shops everyday. There are plenty ways to get a nice cup of something, tea, coffee etc., at much less.

    37. Re:This is a lie by Rhacman · · Score: 1

      I feel like upbringing must have something to do with simply being happier with less.

      Growing up I always found it strange how many families who weren't as well off often spent much more on luxuries than my family. We had basic cable, ate out on special occasions, only got toys for Christmas / birth days, and went to the movies rarely. Families I knew who lived paycheck to paycheck none-the-less spent money on HBO, ate out frequently, bought toys / video games regularly, smoked and/or drank, and just generally made more impulse purchases.

      --
      Account -> Discussions -> Disable Sigs
    38. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone on Slashdot will be dead in 50 years. Young people don't come here.

      I'm surprised we haven't got a "They took muh jerb" article in a while, they always have 1000+ comments.

    39. Re:This is a lie by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Back when I was a wee lad at my first job out of college I skimped and saved, and on a salary at the time of ~$35k, I managed to save about $3k in a year that I put towards my brokerage account. That habit about 4 years later let me retire for two years.

      It isn't a great way to live your entire life, but money that you let compound for 40+ years can make a meaningful difference in your life. Future value of an $850/year annuity is $1MM at 10% interest after 50 years.

    40. Re:This is a lie by swb · · Score: 1

      I actually think he's right, and I know a number of successful people who seem successful because they are able to live life without many "extras".

      A lot of them seem to be single, too, which I think is part of it. The financially successful people I know (and I mean people who did on their own, not through family money) all seem to live like paupers personally. Like whole chickens go on sale, so they buy 6 and live off chicken stew for 2 weeks. They drive pretty uncomfortable cars until they are unfixable. Entertainment consists of movies bought at garage sales or pawn shops.

      You can't do any of that with a wife with other ideas about lifestyle.

      I wish I could do it, but I differ somewhat philosophically from these people. They seem to find value in "bargains" and accumulating money, as if a bank balance provides them happiness. It doesn't work for me; I'd rather enjoy myself with a more involved and richer set of activities and more comfortable lifestyle choices.

      I know too many people who were pretty successful and then got cancer or some other life-changing health problem and found themselves filled with regret about what they never did because they were concerned with saving money. And now they could never do anything with that money but give it away. I'd rather be in that situation barely solvent knowing that I'd lived a full life.

    41. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like that schmuck in Australia who told the young uns the could afford a house in Sydney if only they'd give up avocado toast.

      The original article does *not* say this. It says that, if you're saving up to buy a house, you had better not regularly spend $22 on avocado toast for breakfast.

      Expenses like that add up - and the people who fail to realise this will remain poor.

    42. Re: This is a lie by houghi · · Score: 1

      Not a lie, unless 850USD is nothing for you. If so, please give it to me.

      Also: this would be a bit like security. It is not the only thing he does and it is more an attitude. If you do not buy coffee on the go, you will start to look at other things as well. I see people complain at work that the month is too long for their money, but buy lunch every day instead of making it themselves. Making the thing they buy would easily save them 3Eur (lowballing here) per day. If you complain about money, that could be your internet bill.
      Add to that the coffee and other stuff you do not nee and it starts to add up.

      And all it to to think about it was not buying a coffee.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    43. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You know how rich people get rich? By getting people like you to be brand loyal and buy their stuff just because of the logo on it.

      One of the most offensive things I find about the whole status symbol/purse sub-economy is that those multi thousand dollar purses/bags (if they're not cheap knockoffs) are actually very high quality buy-it-for-life durability. But rather than buying one and then using it for the next 30 years, the target audience buys it and only uses it for the next 3-6 months then tosses it in the back of a closet to rot as its fallen out of style, and then repeats with the next obscenely expensive bag.

    44. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we're talking about daily de luxe coffee at a de luxe coffee shop, not a bit of fun here 'n there. Even many well-to-do people will refuse such an expensive habit.

    45. Re:This is a lie by Quirkz · · Score: 2

      Please. If you're going to give an example like this, also list the interest rate so that people can know the full equation. (It appears you're using 7%).

    46. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is Kevin lying about, exactly? That he drinks homemade coffee? That he invests what he saves? I don't see a lie here, the "lie" is rather more that you don't like when a rich person says that certain luxuries are a waste of money.

      At the end of the year, the person who drinks home made coffee saves that much more money than the person who spends it on starbucks every day.

    47. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're relatively poor but buy a coffee everyday... I guarantee you you're poor because of poor financial decisions and not because of circumstances beyond your control.

      What if I don't want to be rich? Are those financial decisions poor? I mean, I am choosing to not be rich, for a reason. Maybe there's nothing wrong with enjoying some coffee, or a nice book, or my favorite pizza.

      And, if my blue-collar work experience has taught me anything, you probably also spend too much on tobacco, alcohol, and lottery tickets.

      In my experience, the people most likely to overindulge in alcohol are the top-end management, while the workers are desperate slaves to tobacco(it is addictive, and you know who has documented lies and fraud about that property, as well as its other health effects? Yeah, the rich), and the lottery tickets are just an occasional gamble that is much better than what the wealthy want me to do with the money. Which is hand it to them and get nothing back.

      As I've progressed in my career, I actually do find myself exercising MORE restraint with regards to purchases, not less... even though I now have more money than I ever really seriously thought I would.

      And so you're happier with your big piles of money, is that it?

      I realized there's nothing wrong with 'brown bagging' it, nothing wrong with used cars, clothing without fancy brand logos on it, etc.

      Nothing wrong with used cars? That's pretty much wrong as a basic principal. Not that new cars are better, but there's nothing that can suck your money away faster than a used car. And that's limited to the cars themselves mind you, the dealers are the scum of the earth, but that's another matter.

      Clothing? Sam Vimes will point out the flaws in that to you. Not only are you out more money, your feet are still wet.

      I find conspicuous consumption offensively stupid.

      Fine, go shoot the wealthy for offending you. Leave the poor alone.

      The result of this behaviour is that I haven't built up debt, and have paid off the 'unavoidable' debts a lot sooner than most, and now I live fairly comfortably and I'm not particularly stressed about finances. And because I'm not in debt, the money I earn is effectively worth more as I'm not bleeding interest payments to the bank.

      But what is it worth? Does it love you? No? Does it make you happy? Maybe you'd be happier with a few reams of cotton fiber instead. Or you could inhale the ink.

      $850 a year is a LOT of money if you keep rolling it into bonds and you're patient. It might mean helping your kid get through college without crippling debt, or maybe loaning them a down payment on a house.

      Yeah, that's a good way to invest your money, put it into wasting time sending your kid to college, or a house. You know, you could make more money if you put it to something useful instead.

      Like satisfying a desire to have a cup of coffee. But no, no, according to you, that's the END of the world!

      And it's even worse when it comes from the useless frauds whose prime motivating desire is to screw the rest of us, then make us beg for table scraps.

      Some of us have paid attention to their "tax reform" and it's all about screwing anybody who isn't them.

      There is a difference between 'cheap' and 'frugal'.

      There's also a difference between "cheap" and "crap" but sometimes you get one and the same.

      I don't spend money on stupid things.

      One man's stupid thing, is another person's willful choice.

      You know how rich people get rich? By getting people like you to be brand loyal and buy their stuff just because of the logo on it.

      Nope. Oh sure, you want to believe it's all about the logo, but some of us can and do tell t

    48. Re:This is a lie by Cederic · · Score: 1

      The trick is to reach the level of wealth that you can afford to spend very little, and still have nicer things than people with less money.

      Pratchett described this beautifully - see the Vimes 'Boots' theory of socioeconomic unfairness.

      I drive a nicer car than most people. It doesn't break down, so I don't need lots of repairs or regular replacement.
      I bought a nice watch. It doesn't break, and it's worth more now than I paid for it.
      I spent around six times the normal price for an iron. I'm still using it fifteen years later. See also: All my kitchen equipment.
      I'm still using the vacuum I bought in 1999, for three times the price of a 'good' hoover.

      It's definitely worthwhile getting to this position. Sure, it takes some sacrifices. I had to share a house I owned just to pay the mortgage, I didn't eat out and I sure as fuck couldn't afford coffee. It's paid off since.

    49. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't really get the "Avocado Toast" argument. If you live in an area where avocados grow and have a tree in your yard, avocados are free. Actually the trees make so many it can be difficult to keep up. (Note that I try my best to keep up, I like avocados.)

    50. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends, does visiting an airport somewhere else count as traveling much? There are a lot of very nice airports in the world, I could see a quick trip to visit them as being someone's idea of "memorable, meaningful experiences."

    51. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but many "working poor" are complete idiots with their money i.e. they remain poor for good reason. It is not atypical that people who drive truck will frequent weird bars and drop a thousand bucks (or much more) entertaining themselves for a few hours. Then at they whine about not being able to afford things that really matter.

      There was a infamous case in this city where one guy - a construction worker - goes into a strip bar and spent approx. $6000.00 on cocaine, booze, smokes and lap dances in just a few hours. He left drunk out of his mind and ran someone over and killed them. I can comprehend why some "rich" people are a bit put off, especially if they got that way being cautious with personal expenses and behaviour.

      I am a supporter of universal heath care, but I also think that social welfare doesn't owe anyone de luxe coffee at de luxe coffee shops every day. Even many "rich" people won't allow themselves that, as coffee at 3 or 4 dollars a cup is a very expensive way to have a hot drink.

    52. Re:This is a lie by dr_canak · · Score: 1

      I don't know,

      maybe to you and I, $850 annually isn't going to make or break anything.

      But take someone/household who/that is making some $50,000 or less a year (an arbitrary cutoff, but somewhat reflective of half the country). Take that $850 annually and invest it something, returning 9% a year (not a greedy return, but not conservative either).

      In 40 years (a 20 something new to the workforce to a 65 something at retirement), you're talking over $300,000 in return. Now, I understand that's today's dollars, and it won't be worth what $300,000 is today.

      Nevertheless, it's a chunk of money, and an important chunk of money to that part of the workforce that isn't earning a lot, probably isn't saving a lot, and likely isn't in a job with a great retirement package or long term prospects. And all because the person simply skipped a convenience store coffee. Keep smoking, drinking and buying lottery tickets all you want, but just drop the coffee, save that money, and it adds up over time. It's basic financial literacy that so many are ignorant of.

    53. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a reason why a miser typically is relatively rich but not hugely. By aggressively minimizing cost most of the income can be banked, but by avoiding being social they miss a lot of opportunities. They tend to miss good (though risky) long-term investments by insisting on immediate return. There may be a time in life for that, but not for all of it.

      Also, what's the money for, once you have enough to live comfortably? Really, at that point, it's used mainly to exercise power.

      Poor people tend to stay poor, whether due to circumstances, abuse, or choices, and the cohort tends to grow over time in societies that are highly unequal. Rich people tend to stay rich and get richer, sometimes without even trying (though most are always trying). People in between can go either way, and their choices *can* make a personal difference. Saving money by treating coffee shops as social venues rather than daily doses can be one (though a small one incrementally) of those useful (financially) choices.

    54. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no. $300k is not going to let you retire.

    55. Re:This is a lie by Isao · · Score: 1

      If you start at 20 and retire at 70, averaging 8% return, that's over half a million. Not something to replace decent earnings or more serious savings, but not to be ignored, either. Also, for many people $850/yr might be the difference between a rent or mortgage payment and nothing.

    56. Re:This is a lie by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      I don't mind judging people for their ridiculous decisions. If they don't get negative feedback they'll just keep on train wrecking their finances and being a general burden on society. I've known more than a few couples that would fritter away what tiny income they had on worthless stuff like cable TV packages, gigantic TV sets, and commemorative plates, then go begging for help buying groceries.

      I knew one family where only one of the parents could work, the other was disabled, but not receiving disability because he had worked for decades for cash under the table. The one who could work was a CPA but preferred to work her own hours as a hair dresser because she didn't like working in an office. Their heating bills were high because they couldn't be bothered to bundle up with blankets or comforters. They had a $100+ month cable TV bill, for the guy sitting at home all day, while the public library was about a mile away. Both adults had new smart phones with expensive data plans. And somehow when it came time to buy groceries they were broke as could be and had to beg assistance from a local church every month.

      That isn't to say that all people in bad financial situations are deserving of ridicule. But I've sure met a few who could do with a giant heaping serving of shame for making little to no effort to improve their situation while leeching off others. I know still more people that are constantly flirting with disaster by racking up debt and keeping nothing in reserve to handle emergencies.

    57. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's right. that's why workers should organize, form unions, and demand higher wages.

    58. Re:This is a lie by war4peace · · Score: 1

      My post wasn't about coffee specifically. The OP described a whole lifestyle centered about restraining on purchases, and I can't agree with that. Sorry if I misunderstood his statements.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    59. Re:This is a lie by war4peace · · Score: 1

      I'll probably be dead in 10, with nobody to remember me. Maybe my kids and wife, highly doubt it though.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    60. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your only joy in life is waiting in line to pay a fortune for overpriced sugar water, you have nothing to live for.

    61. Re:This is a lie by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      In a way, it's really rational. Think about how often a family less well off may have to hit the reset button, vs. a well to do family. No point in accumulating assets if they're all just seized by creditors.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    62. Re:This is a lie by nwaack · · Score: 1

      How the hell is this modded insightful? Did you read the last sentence of the summary. He says, "The truth is, there is a lot of crap you don't need." He's trying to teach a lesson like the avocado toast guy. Sure, $850 isn't going to break the bank, but if you're willing to get raked over the coals for coffee, then you're probably the guy or gal carrying the newest $800 phone when the $800 phone you bought last year is still working just fine, etc. Or maybe you spend $30 a week on avocado toast when you can't really afford it.

      The point is this - don't constantly waste your money on stuff you don't need and you'll have more of said money.

    63. Re:This is a lie by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Stop focusing on the fucking coffee. That was NOT the point FFS.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    64. Re:This is a lie by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      $850 added to an investment account each year for 50 years with interest is: $387,956.

      Yep but in 50 years, that $390,000 will be worth about $85,000 in today's money due to inflation.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    65. Re:This is a lie by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Stop being so close minded. It's not just the coffee runs.

      I like coffee. Sometmes I buy a nice fresh one shortly before arriving at work. And sometimes I take a book and got to a coffee shop and read there for a while buying one or two coffees.

      No point in cutting all pleasure out of my life on the alter of making more money. what if I get hit by a bus tomorrow after wasting the first half of my life trying to get rich for the second half? I'd feel a right prat.

      It's everything. Cable TV packages

      But I don't have cable.

      , expensive cars, etc.

      I don't own a car.

      BTW, if you think $850 a year is nothing, I'll be happy to take it that much off your hands every year and invest it for myself.

      Well no, see because I can happily spend it on some things I enjoy.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    66. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not blowing hundreds of dollars at a shot to get a lousy seat at a concert when the music's better on my home sound system.

      LOL. As Robert Fripp says, the difference between listening at home and going to a concert is the same as reading a book at home alone and a hot date.

      I'll take the hot date. Most of the shows I saw this year were under $40 a ticket.

    67. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8% is gonna be hard to get these days, especially once you remove inflation....

    68. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That $2.50 coffee is stupid because you don't need it.

      Here are some other stupid things:
      a) new cars
      b) new condos
      c) new houses
      d) tattoos
      e) breast augmentaiton
      f) piercings
      g) jewelry
      h) "smart" tv's
      i) paying for TV services (aren't you supposed to watch free OTA TV?)
      j) new smart phones, computers or laptops, just use the one you have until it dies.

      I could continue. The matter-of-fact thing is that every item on that list is something that people with money buy, and people who don't have money tend to buy on credit. Hence the rich guy who buys a an item without credit isn't paying 30% of it's value to the bank, while all the suckers who use credit do. That house you have a mortgage for? 30% of the value over time goes right into the banks pockets.

      If you want to complain about $2.50 coffee's, look no further than how much money people give to the bank to stay in their homes that they can't afford.

    69. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $850 a year is a LOT of money if you keep rolling it into bonds and you're patient. It might mean helping your kid get through college without crippling debt, or maybe loaning them a down payment on a house.

      I do agree that $850 is quite a lot of money. But "rolling it into bonds" isn't going to do much with current interest rates, that will likely only get worse until central banks realize that they are making a mistake by screwing with the interest rate so much.

    70. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chances are you really don't know how to to drive BMW or any other higher performance vehicle. You get what you pay for depending on whether you know what to do with it. BTW don't buy new, get a BMW or Mercedes that's 2 or 3 years old, let your neighborhood banker take the depreciation hit cuz he needs to have a new car every 2 years. I get them and drive them for 15 years.

    71. Re:This is a lie by Gussington · · Score: 1

      $850 added to an investment account each year for 50 years with interest is:...

      Doesn't matter. To get ahead you need to beat inflation and $2.50 ain't going to do it no matter how many years you keep at it.

    72. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I don't spend money on stupid things"
      How do you tell thing A is stupid and thing B isn't? Let me tell you: you weigh it against your beliefs. So there you go: that 2.5 dollar coffee is stupid to you (and to me too) but is not stupid to the one buying it. And you can't tell them it's stupid because your opinion has equal value to theirs.

      You can use that argument about anything, which is why smart people realize how stupid it is.

      What I meant is that there are two extremes:
      1. Spending all your money on stuff
      and
      2. Spending none of your money on stuff.

      Except the discussion is whether to spend a lot of money to get a little bit of some very particular stuff right now, or to spend much less money on something that gives pretty much the same effect and have money left for other stuff. I was actually just reading this thread, and it explains very well why that can be much more useful: https://forum.mrmoneymustache.com/welcome-to-the-forum/epic-fu-money-stories/

    73. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may, or may not be a lie.

      But is it wise to invest all your hard earned money?

      1) Pay off any loan, it's the best investment (if you can call a loan an investment)
      2) Investment long term - or get something that gives you added value as time goes by.

      - trusting somebody with your (hard earned) money, and trusting that they do not run away with them - whilst lying you blind, or being lied to themselves....

      Time will tell, burn and learn. Remember bubbles? The universe is expanding, everything is. The universe isn't forever, that's a fact!

    74. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $2.20/cup - $0.18/cup = $2.22/cup, multiplied by 1 cup/day times 365 days per year = $846.80 saved vs going to Starbucks each day.

      Who goes to work and/or buys a coffee 365 days of the year?

      Taking off weekends (104 days) and assuming 20 days vacation/public holidays/sickness, then one cup a day would be $2.02 * 241, or $486.82...

    75. Re: This is a lie by grqb · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of a metaphor? In this example, buying expensive coffee is a metaphor for frivolous spending.

    76. Re: This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not what a metaphor is.

      Buying expensive coffee is not symbolic, you are literally spending money.

    77. Re:This is a lie by Pulzar · · Score: 1

      I don't mind judging people for their ridiculous decisions. If they don't get negative feedback they'll just keep on train wrecking their finances and being a general burden on society.

      I hear you. I was focusing on Baron_Yam who claims to be super frugal, while going on vacations, listening to music on a system that sounds better than a live concert, and watching movies at home on a better setup than a movie theater. Frugal, my ass. He just chooses to spend his money differently than others and pretends to have figured things out for the rest of the world.

      That pisses me off. That's different from telling people who have little money to be frugal.

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
    78. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is that a cup of coffee a day equals a very comfortable year or two of retirement? Not a bad deal.

    79. Re:This is a lie by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      $850 added to an investment account each year for 50 years with interest is: $387,956.

      Yep but in 50 years, that $390,000 will be worth about $85,000 in today's money due to inflation.

      And for that $85k in today's buying power, you just need to spend half a century stumbling around in a sleepy daze.

    80. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to the Early Retirement Extreme dude.

    81. Re:This is a lie by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I was operating on the same assumptions that the poster to whom I replied was making, and going on one cup a day.

      How infeasible this might or might not seem to be is irrelevant.

    82. Re:This is a lie by nealric · · Score: 1

      You can extrapolate 50 years of investment returns on any forgone spending. If I lived in a van down by the river and invested my entire salary, I'd be a very wealthy man in 50 years. But I'd rather live in a nice house for 50 years than be filthy rich as an old man.

      The key is to spend money on things that offer good utility on your dollar and balance spending and saving in a way that gives you the lifestyle you are after. A $5/day habit that greatly increases life's enjoyment may be well worth it. If it's not increasing your happiness, then it's probably a waste. Likewise, if there's nothing tens of millions of dollars will buy that will give you much utility, there's little use attempting to make sacrifices to save that much.

    83. Re:This is a lie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I was operating on the same assumptions that the poster to whom I replied was making, and going on one cup a day.

      How can anyone go on one cup a day? I go on one cup per HOUR!

  7. Yea Sure by jetkust · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So I'm supposed to believe a guy that is worth more than $300 million never buys anything he doesn't need? Sounds legit.

    1. Re:Yea Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree. It's complete bollocks. This shouldn't even be on /.

    2. Re:Yea Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't get rich by writing cheques...

    3. Re:Yea Sure by religionofpeas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not buying anything you don't need is how you save up money. And having money is very helpful when you want to get rich.

    4. Re:Yea Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you can spend money on his book I bet.

      Not that he ever would.

    5. Re:Yea Sure by siriuskase · · Score: 4, Interesting

      His advice is reminiscent of the advice in "The Millionaire Next Door", with was a best seller back in the day. The point of that book is that real millionaires usually do not have extravagant lifestyles, that these little savings do add up over time. Or maybe Sam Walton, who lived in a modest ranch house and drove a pickup while simultaneously producing some of the most selfish children to ever walk the earth. They probably feel that they were deprived.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    6. Re:Yea Sure by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Not buying anything you don't need is how you save up money. And having money is very helpful when you want to get rich.

      If you look at the history of Kevin, Mark, and Robert on Shark Tank, the best way to get rich is to get lucky and start a company at the right time (beginning of a bubble) and have it bought for millions.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    7. Re:Yea Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I'm supposed to believe a guy that is worth more than $300 million never buys anything he doesn't need? Sounds legit.

      If you were to talk to most millionaires who earned their money through blood, sweat, and tears, you would find that they sacrificed for decades. They lived in crappy houses, drove shitty cars, and yes, drank 20-cent coffee. Yes, I'm sure he buys stuff he doesn't need (we all do), but he likely waited until he could afford to buy it, unlike the debt-riddled masses.

      For 99% of people, building wealth is about saving and investing. The FOMO masses are too busy YOLOing to be burdened with financial responsibility.

    8. Re:Yea Sure by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      So I'm supposed to believe a guy that is worth more than $300 million never buys anything he doesn't need? Sounds legit.

      He doesn't "need" store coffee, but he "needs" a mansion, "needs" a beemer, "needs" a butler, etc.

      I truly doubt he lives in a shack and drives a '98 Corolla with peeling paint. The coffee talk is a marketing gimmick; the kind he uses to get rich.

    9. Re:Yea Sure by geekmux · · Score: 2

      Not buying anything you don't need is how you save up money. And having money is very helpful when you want to get rich.

      If you look at the history of Kevin, Mark, and Robert on Shark Tank, the best way to get rich is to get lucky and start a company at the right time (beginning of a bubble) and have it bought for millions.

      And if you look at what they sacrificed in order to get their companies off the ground, you would find crappy houses, shitty cars, and 20-cent coffee.

      No one is doubting they struck gold at some point in their career, but they got started by being frugal, unlike what most people do.

    10. Re:Yea Sure by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      the best way to get rich is to get lucky and start a company at the right time

      Starting a company requires money. Even a modest amount like $10k can make a huge difference in chance of success. A lot of people could easily save up $10k in a few years just by being frugal.

    11. Re:Yea Sure by green1 · · Score: 1

      It's not about never buying anything you don't need. It's about prioritizing those things. Buy the things that actually make you happy, but for most people the routine things like the cup of coffee don't actually make them much happier, but the same amount of money, if saved up for even just a little while would.

      Which would make you happier, buying a cup of coffee out every day (instead of making it at home) vs a meal in a nice restaurant every 2 weeks? or save up even longer and buy yourself a computer in a year, or an overseas vacation in a decade, or a nice car in retirement. It's all the same amount of money.

      The thing with these daily purchases is that they very quickly become routines that don't really make you happy anyway because it's just the thing you do every day. A treat you give yourself on occasion is always far more meaningful than a daily routine, and by saving up the small bits can really add up to big things.

      Now saving $250 a day won't get you to $300 million, but the mindset of prioritizing all your purchases, including the small ones, will definitely take you from living paycheque-to-paycheque to living comfortably on the same income.

    12. Re:Yea Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed 100%. I'm pretty sure he didn't save 300 million dollars by skipping Starbucks.

    13. Re:Yea Sure by naris · · Score: 1

      That's very believable. There are a *lot* of rich people that are also very cheap!

    14. Re:Yea Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the best way to get luck and start a company at the right time is to stop going to Starbucks.

    15. Re:Yea Sure by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      And if you look at what they sacrificed in order to get their companies off the ground, you would find crappy houses, shitty cars, and 20-cent coffee.

      Except you can do all that and not strike gold. The all you've got to show for it is 5 years of drinking awful coffee.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    16. Re:Yea Sure by willy_me · · Score: 1

      A bigger impact on company success is networking - you have to know the right people. Interacting with others, even when it involves purchasing overpriced coffee, is worth much more then the 10k you save by being frugal. Being frugal is good for a stable lifestyle but it is not conducive to becoming a millionaire. It is important to be effective before being efficient.

    17. Re:Yea Sure by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      In O'Leary's case at least there was a certain amount of shadiness to help that bit along.

    18. Re:Yea Sure by Gussington · · Score: 1

      Not buying anything you don't need is how you save up money. And having money is very helpful when you want to get rich.

      But isn't the very point of being rich to be able to afford to buy things you don't need? Seems pointless being rich if you're never going to spend your money.

      "I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just squandered". - George Best

    19. Re:Yea Sure by Gussington · · Score: 1

      His advice is reminiscent of the advice in "The Millionaire Next Door", with was a best seller back in the day. The point of that book is that real millionaires usually do not have extravagant lifestyles,

      But Donald Trump has a golden escalator and his own private golf course...

    20. Re:Yea Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But isn't the very point of being rich to be able to afford to buy things you don't need? Seems pointless being rich if you're never going to spend your money.

      Yeah, but the benefit of being rich is that instead of working for money, your money works for you.

      You want enough to keep the capital and live off the investment of it, so it makes sense to put away as much as you can while you're flush.

    21. Re:Yea Sure by nealric · · Score: 1

      Plenty of real millionaires do have extravagant lifestyles though. You can get rich slow by living like a miser on a middle class salary and investing every penny, or you can get rich (relatively) quick with a successful start-up or a slot as a senior executive. Warren Buffet may be famous for living in the same house for over 50 years and driving a relatively modest cars, but he also flies in private jets and I guarantee he isn't staying at a Motel 6 when he travels.

  8. Treat it as a luxury by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are lots of things that are cheaper at home. Drinking a beer at home is a lot cheaper than drinking one at the pub, for example. You're not just paying for the drink, you're paying for the use of a big space where you can talk to other people. The problem isn't $2.50 coffee (actually, I'd be astonished if I could buy coffee that cheap around here), it's buying $2.50 coffee every day. Even once a day each week, that's $50/month on coffee. Two coffees a day and it's $100/month. Give that up, and you can afford a nice holiday somewhere, or pay back your mortgage earlier.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    1. Re: Treat it as a luxury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why take a nice holiday when itâ(TM)s so much cheaper to stay home?

    2. Re: Treat it as a luxury by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Not to mention you can rent the whole house save for a tiny 80 square foot area and save even more!

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    3. Re: Treat it as a luxury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drinking a beer at home is a lot cheaper than drinking one at the pub, for example. You're not just paying for the drink, you're paying for the use of a big space where you can talk to other people.

      If we actually had decent pubs around here I'd still do that but instead it's just bars that crank up the music so loud that the damn bartender can't even hear you not can you have any conversation. Therefore not only is it cheaper to stock up the house with booze but it ends up being more enjoyable to just throw a party at home with your friends instead.

      Why take a nice holiday when itâ(TM)s so much cheaper to stay home?

      This attitude never helps things, nobody is saying to drop ALL luxuries. This is about a stupid cup of coffee, not discussing the merits of staying home rather than going on a ski trip or visiting Las Vegas.

    4. Re: Treat it as a luxury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a normal workday I can make coffee at home that's better than Starbucks, and it takes less time to make it than it takes to purchase it. (And it's not because I'm special or because I have especially good gear, though I do.) So the result is in no way worse than the more expensive alternative. A vacation at home fails in this regard. If I could efficiently make better Laotian or Nepalese food than what's served in my favorite restaurants, I'd be stupid to keep going there.

    5. Re: Treat it as a luxury by green1 · · Score: 1

      It's about priorities. "you can't take it with you when you die" remains true to this day.

      The question is, does that coffee, or that beer, or whatever it is, really add happiness to your life? If you're doing it every single day, there's a good chance it doesn't (especially the coffee as it doesn't tend to be much of a social occasion, the beer at the pub might be with your friends and you tend to stay around longer to enjoy that time).
      That same money can however be saved up to be worth a lot more on something that may really contribute to your overall happiness. For the OP here the priority was a vacation. Others may prefer to spend it on a car, or on a home theatre system, or whatever. The point is in prioritizing your spending so that you get the most happiness out of the money that you have.

      People all too often dismiss small purchases as not having much effect on their overall finances, but nothing can be further from the truth. Every dollar adds up, and a mindset that ignores small purchases tends to ignore more than just a single cup of coffee, and it quickly makes the difference between constant financial stress, and being comfortable with what you have.

    6. Re: Treat it as a luxury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also about getting more value for your dollar, and trying to avoid throwing away money.

      It's a very Mustachian approach.

      "Your current middle-class life is an Exploding Volcano of Wastefulness"!

    7. Re: Treat it as a luxury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the office is closed on holidays. Did you mean vacation?

      "Holiday" comes from the Roman term for holy days. These were festivals when business was suspended for the day, usually by law. Nobody works on holidays and it doesn't count against anyone's allotted time off.

      "Vacation" is the opposite of that. These are the "vacant days" where it's business-as-usual. If you're taking time off from your allotment of time off, it's not a holiday. You're taking off on a non-holy, vacant day.

      British English is like normal English, but they've forgotten how they used to speak and why, so they've replaced it with "the opposite of whatever Americans do, because they must be wrong". It's a sad state of affairs for their language, really.

    8. Re: Treat it as a luxury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "Holiday" comes from the Roman term for holy days

      Old English, not Roman.

    9. Re: Treat it as a luxury by green1 · · Score: 1

      He's a little too no-frills for my liking generally, but the overall sentiment is correct.

      I thought about it, and I could probably have retired years ago, but I decided that wasn't the lifestyle I would want. It's all about balance, and that is a different place for everyone. And waste is also in the eyes of the beholder.

      There's nothing wrong with indulging yourself. You just have to realize that when you spend money on one thing, it means you won't be able to spend it on something else, and that includes all the small things that add up to big things. I decided I'd rather work a few more years, but drive a nice car, live in a nice house, and take some nice vacations. Fully realizing that I could have chosen to retire earlier, but not have the car, house, or vacations. I also chose to work a bit longer to know that in retirement I'll also be able to stay in my nice house, buy other nice cars, and take other nice vacations. I could also probably save more money by moving to another city with lower housing costs, but my family and friends are here and I'd rather stay here.

      It's all about balancing your priorities.

      The issue most people have is that they don't do the exercise of balancing those priorities, and often ignore small purchases thinking they don't matter, when in fact we know that those small purchases add up to real money over time, and over number of little indulgences. If you're thinking about it, and decide that really is your priority, than who am I to say otherwise? But if you haven't thought about it, then I feel quite justified in saying that you're making foolish decisions.

    10. Re: Treat it as a luxury by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good, you really get it!

      It's good to strive for a good life and work for it, always remembering one of the "things" you're spending on is your future.

      I want to save for a nice retirement, but I could die in an accident tomorrow and I don't want to spend my last days eating rice and beans.

  9. Re:Running a business has overhead by shmlco · · Score: 2

    Reread, please. He says it costs HIM 18 cents to make.

    --
    Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
  10. Coffee is "crap" but money is the real thing? by Archtech · · Score: 1

    '"The truth is, there is a lot of crap you don't need," he explains'.

    As you go through life you can use the proceeds of your labour for different things. Kevin O'Leary apparently thinks that nothing beats a good big juicy investment portfolio.

    If he thinks a cup of coffee cost 18 cents, I can imagine what kind of coffee he drinks. Anyone else thinking "Scrooge"?

    --
    I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    1. Re:Coffee is "crap" but money is the real thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find that most people who complain about "rip off" coffee places, when pressed on it / asked to back up their claims, actually have a problem with people using the word "coffee" to describe those places.

        - "It's a rip off!" -> the plain coffee you're drinking tends to cost less than 50 cents when purchased from such places, which seems like a fair mark-up when buying a single prepared item, instead of buying bulk ingredients. The thing you are comparing it to is a specialty drink.

        - "It's shit!" -> the plain coffee you're drinking tends to be made of coffee beans and water. The thing you are comparing it to is made of 27 different ingredients, one of which is coffee.

        - "It's full of sugar!" -> the plain coffee you're drinking tends to be made of coffee beans and water. The thing you are comparing it to is more-comparable to a milk shake.

        - "They shouldn't call it coffee!" -> they plain coffee drink you're drinking is sold exactly as you make it, under the name "coffee", or "americano". The thing you are talking about is not sold under the name "coffee". In summary: they don't.

        - "Then they shouldn't call it a coffee shop!" -> The business does not refer to itself as a coffee shop, cafe, or similar.

        - "Then people shouldn't go around calling it a coffee shop!" -> Yeah, probably not.

    2. Re: Coffee is "crap" but money is the real thing? by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      18 cents sounds high, to me. I bought a decent automatic espresso machine for about $300 5 years ago. I drink, on average, 2 cups of coffee per day from it. I expect it to last another 5 years. That's about 4 cents per cup. I buy organic kona blend beans (not pure kona, but pretty tasty never the less) from Costco, at $14 per 2.5 pounds. At . 3 ounces per cup, that is about 10.7 cents per cup. Add in 1.3 cents for electricity and my RO filtered well water, and you get about 15 cents per cup. It takes about 90 seconds to turn on the machine and generate the first cup. 120 seconds if I have to refill the beans, dump the grounds, and refill the water. Subsequent cups take less time. Id consider my home coffee superior to most everything I might buy out, with the exception of any artisnal coffee place selling a high grade (pure kona or similar) coffee generates by a semi automatic espresso machine, operated by someone who knows how to use it.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    3. Re:Coffee is "crap" but money is the real thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get my coffee from a gas station where a 32oz cup is $0.89, plus the condiment bar has caffeine packs to make it stronger. The coffee shop down the block sells coffee near the same quality, but a 32oz cup costs nearly $5. The whole phenomenon of upscale coffee drinks is perpetuated by children/teens who want to drink coffee like adults but hate the taste of coffee, kinda like the people who invented candy-flavored schnapps and wine coolers for people who want to get drunk without tasting the hard stuff.

      CAPTCHA: creamed

      touche /.

    4. Re:Coffee is "crap" but money is the real thing? by stinerman · · Score: 1

      Well, like anything maybe he doesn't put a lot of value in drinking good coffee. I don't like coffee so I don't drink it. I'm even saving more than the $0.18 he purportedly saves!

      I think people should spend money in proportion to what they find important. My wife sent me out for nutmeg the other day. I bought the cheapest nutmeg I could find. When I look for a keyboard, I want a premium keyboard. If you want premium coffee and are willing to pay that premium, that's fine with me. I think it's a useless extravagance, but maybe you might think my keyboard is the same.

  11. Uhmmm.... why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this supposed to be interesting or something?

    1. Re:Uhmmm.... why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't you know? Investments are nerdy news now, and everyone knows coffee matters more than most human lives.

  12. Who Gives a Shit? by Luthair · · Score: 4, Informative

    How is this News for Nerds? More importantly do we really want to take financial advise from this guy?

    1. Re: Who Gives a Shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up. That link needs to be the top search term for this jerk's name online. He is Canada's miniDrumpf and is anti-lower and middle-class to his core.

      Thank heavens he flamed out in his bid to enter politics... for now.

    2. Re:Who Gives a Shit? by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      It's a attack on caffeine. This isn't just news for nerds, it's a call to arms!

    3. Re:Who Gives a Shit? by chispito · · Score: 1

      How is this News for Nerds? More importantly do we really want to take financial advise from this guy?

      An article titled "The real and shocking story of..." sounds like a pretty unbiased source.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    4. Re:Who Gives a Shit? by Luthair · · Score: 1

      An article titled "The real and shocking story of..." sounds like a pretty unbiased source.

      I'm not sure you understand what bias is and when its applicable

    5. Re:Who Gives a Shit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just as a comment, and certainly not an endorsement, he did end up with $300 million (so far).

  13. Yeah! Why pay more than 5$ for a bottle of wine? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
    I would never pay more than 5$ for a bottle of wine. Because I am a teetotaler.

    But if someone is willing to spend 250$ of his/her hard earned money voluntarily who am I to object? It is all fine an good to preach about the value of drinking a 10$ bottle of wine and investing the rest. But be prepared to listen someone tell you why that 250$ bottle of wine is worth it and gives him/her a good feeling that is worth it.

    I can tell a wine snob to take a hike and go fly a kite because I never preached about better ways to spend that money. It is your money how you spend is your business, give me the same respect, don't be a wine/coffee snob to me. But that O'Leary guy has opened to door, he deserves all the crap wine/coffee snobs heap on him.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  14. It's capitalism by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    It's not just coffee. Almost everything has a ridiculous markup. Capitalism is awesome.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  15. Rich people think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

    Rich people think the reason people are poor is because they spend little bits of money here and there. Budgeting is one issue with people but really its a lack of money. Also spending little bits of money is good for the economy.

    1. Re:Rich people think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing that creates wealth is wealth.

    2. Re:Rich people think by mrun4982 · · Score: 2

      That IS the reason they are poor. It's not just the coffee runs but everything. Literally every single person I know who is poor not only spends tons of money on coffee but they spend $200 on the fancy cable TV package in addition to subscribing to Netflix/Hulu/Spotify/etc, they buy tons of beer/wine/etc, they always drive 2 brand new cars, they shop at expensive stores, etc. As soon as they get a bunch of unexpected money (e.g. Christmas, tax refund, etc) they blow it on expensive vacations or something else instead of investing it, keeping it in an emergency fund, etc. They're always asking to "borrow" money.

    3. Re:Rich people think by Luthair · · Score: 2

      What you're talking about is living at your means, not being poor.

    4. Re:Rich people think by green1 · · Score: 2

      This is the issue with the economy. It relies on people being bad with money. The economy would do horribly if the majority of people did what's best for themselves.

      That said, people ARE poor because they spend little bits of money here and there. Budgeting IS a real issue with a huge percentage of people. Now I'm not saying that budgeting alone will make a poor person rich, but it will make almost anyone richer than they otherwise would be, and by a surprisingly large amount.

      Kevin O'Leary isn't saying that if you stop buying coffee each day you'll end up like him. You won't. But if you have that mindset you'll probably find that instead of living paycheque to paycheque you're suddenly quite comfortable on the same income.

      I have friends who earn twice as much as I do, but are penniless and have no more to show for it, they're no happier than I am for all their little spending on small items, but they are jealous of the larger purchases I've been able to make by saving up.

    5. Re:Rich people think by mark-t · · Score: 4, Informative

      Of the things you've mentioned, the only thing actually poor people can do is ask to borrow money. People who have any ability to do the other things you said are not poor.

      I've been poor. We didn't have a cable tv package, fancy or otherwise. We had one car between my wife and I, and we drove that thing into the dirt. We bought groceries at the nearby discount grocery store, and we certainly didn't go on any vacations.

    6. Re:Rich people think by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

      They'll find a way to screw you (a nation) if you aren't careful. Japan tends to save money, stow it away in a bank, and cook more than the USA. So where is their money going? Housing is more expensive, fuel more expensive, travel in general more expensive, more taxes, more government fees on vehicles, and I don't even know what else.

      It makes me think the general population is under attack by the wealthy or powerful no matter where you are. Maybe that is right.

      But yeah, I know plenty of people who just straight waste money nonstop when they can't afford it. I'd recommend making your own meals 90% of the time, drinking free stuff at work, getting the cheapest phone deal possible, cancelling junk TV service, etc.

    7. Re:Rich people think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are two main reasons people are poor: not having enough money; and having enough money but spending it all.

      If you do not have enough money to save because you had to spend if all on food and healthcare, that's a shame. If you have enough money to save but instead spend $5 a day on coffee and $100 a month on clothes, then it's not a shame -- you simply prioritized fancy coffee and clothing over saving.

      For example, there are people who are so poor that if their car breaks, they can't afford the $1000 repair bill and can't get to work. Some of those people could simply stop buying coffee and clothing for several months and then they'd be able to pay for the repair and not have to worry about whether they can get to work. But it's wrong to assume that if somebody is poor then it must be due to prioritizing firvolities over necessities

      dom

    8. Re:Rich people think by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      That said, people ARE poor because they spend little bits of money here and there.

      And for assorted other reasons, such as not making enough money, unexpected medical expenses, etc. Spending little bits of money here and there can be necessary for survival in conditions like that.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  16. Never have truer words bee spoken by CustomBuild · · Score: 3, Insightful

    His example is analogous to $100 HDMI cables, and the world is full of these examples. It's easy to laugh at someone when their choice is not your choice, but the fact is the world is run by parting fools and their money.

    1. Re:Never have truer words bee spoken by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No it's not. You're comparing a product with high markup for absolutely zero benefit to a product with high mark up due to it having to cover cost of rent, wages, equipment and training.

      You're also comparing something with no benefit (cheap vs expensive HDMI cables) to something with a very clear quality (home brewed vs espresso or latte) or service benefit (if you only make espressos at home there's a big time saving in not screwing with your machine in the morning).

      The service industry is a thing, and people don't line up in the mornings because they want to set money on fire. Except at Starbucks which categorically CAN be beaten by pouring hot water on some instant coffee powder.

  17. Re:Running a business has overhead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    He's talking about what it costs him. Make a pot of coffee yourself and the price per cup is about 20 cents. Everyone in the family can have one before work. Whereas if a family of four have coffee out each day of the work/school week - Mom & Dad $2.50 each at a coffee shop and the teens $2.00 each at Tim Horton's, then that's 9 dollars each work day, for let's says 200 work/school days in a year, which totals $1800.00, just on one coffee each, i.e. around $20,000.00 a decade. That could pay for the Toyota.

  18. Still too much by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

    I haven't done the precise math, but I think my cup of coffee is closer to 2 than 20 cents. I guess you can waste money at home too, if you use something like those proprietary capsule fads.

    Nevertheless, I second the underlying idea. More generally, I don't understand why people feel the need to spend everything they earn, in particular, increasing their spending the moment they get a better job. Though I guess it's a matter of personality. I like to keep things simple, and I also like the opportunity of going back to school or personal art projects now and then. Honestly, since starting my first proper full-time job, I simply haven't been able to spend everything I earn, with all the time taken by the job itself.

    --
    Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    1. Re:Still too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... I think my cup of coffee is closer to 2 than 20 cents ...

      At Verizon stores, the coffee is only .02 cents. You can save Kilobucks there.

  19. Give it a rest by Vicious+Penguin · · Score: 1

    I'm really tired of this attitude.

    It is essentially: "I don't like your life preferences, therefore you are an idiot."

    People like to get pleasure in many different ways. I also think spending a bunch of money on coffee is a bit silly. Then again, I don't drink coffee, so what do I know?.

    You should not care at all what I think. If you can afford it and you enjoy it, then knock yourself out.

    This is the kind of foolishness that has happened as politics becomes a lifestyle.

    Please, just mind your own damn business.

    1. Re:Give it a rest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your post is the kind of foolishness that has happened since people have become so dumb-downed that they don't know the difference between lifestyle mandate, and ADVICE.

      Sorry to tell you this, Sunshine, but YOU are the example of politics becoming a lifestyle, not the guy who is giving you some free (and extremely old, mind you) wisdom.

    2. Re:Give it a rest by green1 · · Score: 1

      That's true. But the same goes both ways. Don't complain back to me that you don't have money just because you're spending it on frivolous things.

      I far too often hear people saying that they're poor and can barely afford rent and are in debt up to their eyeballs, and that somebody needs to DO SOMETHING about it to help them. But then you find out that those same people are often buying $2.50 coffees, and eating lunch out every day. Don't complain to me about your life choices.

  20. His book was ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I just bought his book called "The cold hard truth about men, women and money". It is pretty good, and mostly is full of these kinds of ideas. I really think people just don't get personal finance at all, and don't realize these things are literally like death by a thousand cuts. Not that Kevin O'Leary is perfect, but at least it is written in language that is accessible to most people, and will probably get them worked up emotionally, and then on his side. The people who won't like it, is that group who thinks that people need to keep spending to keep everything running in the economy. If you know what I mean. Those who don't really want people saving money.

    1. Re:His book was ok by boudie2 · · Score: 1

      On behalf of Kevin O'Leary, thanks, sucker.

    2. Re:His book was ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you doing here, Kelvin?

    3. Re:His book was ok by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Death by a thousand cuts is also what is called living. You can save a lot of money by denying yourself things that make you happy. I hope you realise that wealth is no substitute for happiness before you get too far through the process.

       

  21. It's hard to buy a cup of coffee for under a buck by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

    The simple truth is if you want a cup of coffee while you're out and about, you're going to be spending > $1 because nobody is selling a cup of coffee for less than that.

    The only way to get a cheap cup of coffee is to make it yourself, and you can't really do that unless you're at home or at an office that has a coffeemaker. Coffee shops know this, which is why they charge so much.

    I'm not going to give up coffee over a dollar or two. Neither are most people; that's why coffee is $1-$2. It sucks, but what can you do? I can't control what everyone else does, and I want my coffee.

  22. That whole "your time worth" is BS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You don't get paid on your time off. And most of us just can't tell the boss "I'm gonna work extra hours because I'd rather earn the money to go out than cook a meal." It just doesn't work that way.

    1. Re:That whole "your time worth" is BS. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Talk for yourself. How many here are working in jobs where they can easily pile on more hours because there's perpetual crunch and ever project is late?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:That whole "your time worth" is BS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but mentally placing a value per hour on your time is a really convenient way to decide between a set of alternatives especially as the time you have available decreases. If you have lots of free time then you probably don't see the value in it.

    3. Re:That whole "your time worth" is BS. by green1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and no. For you or me, that's correct, however Kevin O'Leary is self-employed, he works whatever hours he feels like. If he could be doing something more productive than making coffee, then he is definitely making exactly that choice.

      And it's not just wealthy people like Kevin O'Leary that that applies too, it applies to pretty much anyone who is self employed. They make the choices as to what hours they work, and that directly affects the amount of money they make.

      The lesson here though overall isn't about the time (that's just really to counter the people who pretend that driving and waiting in line is more convenient than making coffee at home, an incredibly easy process). The real lesson here isn't even about the coffee. Kevin's lesson here is about priorities, and it's a good one (don't get me wrong, Kevin's a big jerk, and I disagree with many things he says, but in this particular case he's right).

      Many people dismiss small purchases as not impacting their financial well being, but everything adds up. Sure a cup of coffee is unlikely to bankrupt you, nor will getting one on your work every day. But it's the attitude that goes along with that, an attitude that doesn't pay too much attention to the little purchases, and often doesn't understand where all the money goes. The coffee also often ends up being a pastry too, and that same person is more likely to eat out for lunch every day instead of packing a lunch at home. They may be more likely to order take-out for dinner too. All of these things add up to hundreds of dollars a month.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying not to get a coffee, or not to eat out, I'm just saying prioritize. Eating out on occasion is a nice treat, doing it as a routine gets boring pretty quickly and often doesn't give you that same amount of satisfaction, and then you look at the money you can save every month and think about what you could do with that.

      I have friends who earn twice as much money as I do, but who think I'm rich and that they're poor. It's just about what they do with their money vs what I do with mine.

    4. Re:That whole "your time worth" is BS. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Adding extra hours is easy. Getting paid more for doing so nigh-on impossible.

      You're actually paid by the hour? In this industry? That's.. unexpected.

    5. Re:That whole "your time worth" is BS. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I get paid by the hour, 1.5 rate after 20:00, 2x rate on weekends, with no more than 10 hours per day allowed. Extra hours have to be paid, and while I have to get them signed off to be allowed to do them (within the limits of 10 hours a day), given the workload we normally have it's usually met with "could you do more?" instead of refusal.

      Welcome to the work laws of socialist Europe.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:That whole "your time worth" is BS. by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I've been paid by the hour as a contractor. I found overtime far more pleasant when I could leave the meter running.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    7. Re:That whole "your time worth" is BS. by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Depends. I stopped mowing my own lawn about a dozen years ago when I started working on a project that required 6-7 day workweeks. I was getting paid for all of my time, and my time was certainly worth more in the office than the $40 it cost me, and saved me 1.5-2 hrs./week. Anything that I would normally do, that I can pay someone else to do for less than what I'm earning, is generally worth it to me...even if I decide to sit on my ass and watch a football game while Molly Maid cleans my house. That's because your time off is important too...you don't run a marathon, and then start another one without a break.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  23. Personality and Principle by redmasq · · Score: 1

    I do not think that given his potential income that "coffee shop" coffee will make or break him. On the other hand, someone that that makes far less could put that same money into savings to get a bit shy of an extra thousand a year of financial buffer, assuming that they do not choose to divert it elsewhere. Of course, the few minutes of time making his own coffee could be invested elsewhere, but if anything like my significant other, then that task is likely being "worked-in" as part of multitasking another close proximity task such as making breakfast. Before I started my career, I usually eschewed "barista made coffee" except when "treating myself" after passing my finals or getting high enough performance reviews to qualify for a bonus. Now since I make a reasonable salary, I am a bit more relaxed about "extras." That said, as per the adage, "if you want something done right, do it yourself": I like my coffee a particular way, so I still tend to brew it myself. Also, the gentleman, who probably does it purely on principle, is free to make his own choice to brew it himself just as the person that opts to pay a premium to have it done for them.

  24. Hindustan Lever Vs Proctor and Gamble by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Hindustan Lever is an Indian cosmetics/soap and shampoo giant. It sells shampoo in single use sachets. Back in the day it used to cost 5 rupees, or 30 US cents back in the day. Now it is probably 20 Rupees, same 30cents. Proctor and Gamble's idea of marketing was to some how convince the buyer into buying shampoo in gallon size jugs and they are busily hatching up plans to convince America why it is a good idea to buy shampoo in barrels instead of gallon jugs.

    They both were locked into a serious battle in South Asian shampoo market. With all that might of P&G, HL was running circles around them

    My niece is a big shot in that circle (now working for Estee Lauder India) she explained the basic difference. "There are women who can not afford shampoo. But once in a while something nice happens, and she feels great and feels like treating herself to luxury. That thirty cent sachet of shampoo is a luxury for her. She will never have enough to buy a whole bottle ever, and will balk at the cost of a bottle. But... on any given day there are about a million such women willing to buy a sachet of shampoo for 30 cents. I am selling 300K a day. 100 million dollars a year."

    There are people for whom that 5$ coffee is a luxury they are treating themselves to. The American dream of owning a home and having a comfortable retirement is gone for them. They see themselves working till the day they are going to die. They see 80 year old grandmas trying to work as walmart greeters. From their perspective, "I have 5$ today, I am going to splurge!".

    A country this great, this wealthy, with that much of despair among the young ...

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Hindustan Lever Vs Proctor and Gamble by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I forgot to finish the post.

      It is all fine and good for most people not to know this nugget of information. But for someone who is a "professional" investor, whose claim to fame is finding companies to invest, he should know this. Not the specific thing about Hindustan Lever or any such specific company. But the fact that there is lot of money to be made in small margin large volume sales. Large volume sales by definition means it is something you knew but never realized the market.

      O'Leary might not know the Hindustan Lever story. But he should have known the moral of that story.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    2. Re:Hindustan Lever Vs Proctor and Gamble by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      I don't know about despair, but in a lot of cases you're right: it's about treating yourself. And as Jack Vance wrote in one of his novels: "Money spent on pleasure is money well spent." Or Oscar Wilde: "I have often deprived myself of the necessities of life, but I have never consented to give up a luxury." Contrast that with one of our reality TV shows where a financial adviser comes to help out families in debt. Always the advise is to forego the little things that add up to bugger all, compared to the bigger bills they have to deal with, but gives them some pleasure in life. If you can't afford it, you can't have it, sure, but otherwise everyone needs to treat themselves from time to time. Maybe that's having some overpriced coffee in a hipster joint.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    3. Re:Hindustan Lever Vs Proctor and Gamble by pz · · Score: 1

      There are people for whom that 5$ coffee is a luxury they are treating themselves to.

      These are not the people I most often see in line when walking past Starbucks.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    4. Re:Hindustan Lever Vs Proctor and Gamble by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      We coders know the basic rule about fine tuning code for speed.

      We don't randomly pick functions and make them more efficient. First we profile the code and find the function, loop that is taking most time. Then spend time to make it more efficient. We might make the implementation more efficient, or invent a new algorithm that does not need this expensive process.

      In life too, if you make one big sane decision, it pays for lots of small luxuries. Settle for a car one notch below what you can afford, and take good care of it to stretch its life. If you pay it off in four years, and extract six more years without car payments from it, you are looking at some 400$ a month, worth three latte day for the six years without car payments. If you saved 50$ a month by choosing "less" of a car, you can still have a latte twice a week.

      But there could be people who feel great everytime they get into their "luxury" car, it might be totally worth it.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    5. Re:Hindustan Lever Vs Proctor and Gamble by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      These are not the people I most often see in line when walking past Starbucks.

      Appearances are deceiving. Many low income people dress well. They have dressed poor and were ill treated for it, and so they know how to appear rich.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    6. Re:Hindustan Lever Vs Proctor and Gamble by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The problem isn't the people who spend $5 on a cup of coffee as a luxury, the problem is the people that spend $5/day on Starbucks coffee because they think $5 is cheap, don't realise that they're spending 10% of their disposable income on coffee, and then complain that they can't afford other luxuries.

      I've had several acquaintances that fall into this category: they'll buy coffee-shop coffee every day (sometimes multiple times), or other small recurring expenses that don't add much to their quality of life but do add up to a big chunk over the year, and then complain that they can't afford small luxuries that cost far less than their recurring habit.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:Hindustan Lever Vs Proctor and Gamble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry but you lost me at hygiene advice from India.

    8. Re:Hindustan Lever Vs Proctor and Gamble by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 0

      Get lost, go fight to ban the movie padmavati or something.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    9. Re:Hindustan Lever Vs Proctor and Gamble by dr_canak · · Score: 1

      Interesting story,

      and a solid post. But in all fairness to the summary (admittedly I didn't read the article. I'm not new here ;-) ), it says nothing about O'Leary not investing in something like a Starbucks, or any of the other myriad types of coffee house chains. It just says he wouldn't be a customer. But, I'm sure he's shrewd enough to recognize that even small margins, at high volume, can turn a profit.

    10. Re:Hindustan Lever Vs Proctor and Gamble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A bottle of shampoo is somewhere around $1. If you buy the fancy stuff, it's maybe $10, and I can see that being too much to ask. But if a one-use packet is $0.30, just save up for 3 more days, and you can have the whole bottle with more than 4 uses. And, honestly, fragrance aside, shampoo is shampoo. It's all a mixture of sodium lauryl sulfate and/or sodium laureth sulfate (yes, those are two different things) and some other cheap industrial-byproduct-grade chemicals. Even shampoo+conditioner mixes aren't terribly chemically complex and are cheap to produce.

      There's, by far, more preference involved in buying coffee. Your niece was wise to find a way out of the soon-to-be-dying wreckage of those companies.

      Oh, and I, personally, buy shampoo under the Suave label, which is a Unilever (parent of HL) brand. They're not above selling huge bottles of stuff, or pricing it cheaply. Suave is cheap.

    11. Re:Hindustan Lever Vs Proctor and Gamble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good post, thanks for the story. It's interesting because I bet that P&G sees the larger sized bottle as a huge savings for distribution and inventory management, but the end consumer just can't afford to buy the product. It's like if they sold Cadillacs in a six pack at a discount. Sure, it's cheaper, but who needs all those extra cars in their driveway while they use up the first one?

    12. Re:Hindustan Lever Vs Proctor and Gamble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And history repeats itself - the lipstick index [0] from the early 2000s, and then the nail polish index. Both of those seem to fall apart under continued scrutiny, but perhaps the overall economic situation in India may keep the 'shampoo index' valid a while longer.

      [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lipstick_index

    13. Re:Hindustan Lever Vs Proctor and Gamble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      O'Leary might not know the Hindustan Lever story. But he should have known the moral of that story.

      You explain why people choose to spend money in a way that is irrational. No one disagrees that this happens. O'Leary is not arguing that everyone is always rational. He is saying that he personally does not do the irrational thing.

    14. Re:Hindustan Lever Vs Proctor and Gamble by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The American dream of owning a home and having a comfortable retirement is gone for them

      For some of us that was never the dream in the first place. Save and deny ourselves a life to spend our end of days comfortably rotting away in a building we thankfully own? No thanks. I'd rather work when my bones are old and frail and save when my teeth can't chew. Life is for living. My taste buds are at their prime and instant coffee can be saved for my retirement.

      Christmas trip has been booked to Finland. Beer there is €8 per cup. Screw the American dream.

    15. Re:Hindustan Lever Vs Proctor and Gamble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure he'd be happy to SELL you expensive coffee, he just doesn't think you should be buying it, which sounds like good advice for the people you're talking about. Responding to the prospect of needing more money in your old age than you have by spending the money that you do have now doesn't sound terribly smart to me, even if, yes, some people would do that and there is money to be made off of that - the time where that kind of thinking would make more sense would be if you don't have a reliable way of storing value for a long time, which does describe many poorer areas of the world, which is tragic.

    16. Re:Hindustan Lever Vs Proctor and Gamble by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      Good story. Too bad it is a complete lie. A cheap bottle of shampoo is about $1 in India. Who would buy a 30 cent packet when a 2 month bottle is $1.

    17. Re:Hindustan Lever Vs Proctor and Gamble by wakawakka · · Score: 1

      There is a saying in french, which translates roughly as: "Poor people dont have a lot of money, but there is a lot of poor people"

  25. Re:Yeah! Why pay more than 5$ for a bottle of wine by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

    Sometimes it is worth it. I bought a Japanese tea once that was valued at twice its weight in silver. That was without a doubt the best tea I've ever tasted. And before you say that I only thought that it was good because it was so expensive, I have poured a cup for a colleague who often mooches a tea from my personal collection and he also said that it was absolutely the tastiest cup of tea he ever had - and I never told him how expensive it was. Someday - when I feel better and have enough money set aside - I'll buy that tea again.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  26. Re:Running a business has overhead by war4peace · · Score: 2

    If I would have just jerked off instead of renting hookers, I would have been a millionaire!

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  27. Re:Yeah! Why pay more than 5$ for a bottle of wine by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

    I wonder what he thinks of bottled water? Now there is a money making racket :)

  28. This is why they have a panel and not just Kevin by nelvinboy · · Score: 1

    His mind clearly cannot grasp other forms of value. I'm glad they have other investors on the panel like Troy Carter and Lori Greiner who can better understand human/consumer psyches and will invest in startups that address these areas. Those of us who are engineers often have trouble wrapping our heads around intangible value. If you want to expand your thinking in this area, I highly recommend a listen to this podcast episode: https://www.farnamstreetblog.c...

  29. O'Leary is a retard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But he's not wrong here. Then again, broken clock / twice a day and all that.

  30. $2.50 is overpriced... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    $2.50 is overpriced for store-bought coffee. The local bodega (deli) on the way to work charges a buck a cup, and it's not charred like Starbucks.

    Make your own, but also don't overpay for chain coffee shops.

    1. Re:$2.50 is overpriced... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what the real problem here is? The real problem is that you've obsessed so much about a cup of coffee that you're totally missed the larger point that was being made. I find it odd that in a forum of people who generally consider themselves ahead of the intelligence curve compared to others have been so easily distracted into ranting and raving so many times about a cup of coffee.
       
      It seems like something has overthrown your ability to stay on topic and on target.
       
      The entire comment section of this story seems to be a fine example as to why people spend so much* on so little.
       
      * Time in this case.

  31. Kevin O'Leary is a psychopath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's just one more example of these big business psychopaths. To them, other human beings all fall in only three categories: A competitor to eliminate, an ennemy to destroy, or a resource to exploit. He's the canadian equivalent of Donald Trump, and every bit as disgusting.

    These people are cold, manipulative, heartless, ruthless machines. They have absolutely no empathy, no compassion, no heart, no soul. They are monsters, abominations. They are behind every plague of humanity: Organised crime, sexual predators, slavery, human traficking, tyrany, genocide and bloodshed.

    Why a supposedly advanced race tolerates the existence of such cancer of humanity is beyond me.

    1. Re:Kevin O'Leary is a psychopath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He seems like a decent guy.

  32. Most expensive? In Tokyo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But there was not a show called Shark Tank at the time; his advice is timeless anyway. So I bought a medium sized pizza at a pizza place called King Arthur and ate the whole thing. Really, lunch vs. coffee sounded like a no-brainer.

  33. Re:Running a business has overhead by adonoman · · Score: 0

    No it doesn't. It costs him 18 cents in supplies. But I guarantee you it'd be cheaper for him to pay an intern $2 for the time it takes to brew the coffee, and get it to his desk. For him to spend the time doing it, is burning up his time at a much pricier rate.

  34. Re:Running a business has overhead by arth1 · · Score: 1

    He's talking about what it costs him. Make a pot of coffee yourself and the price per cup is about 20 cents.

    That depends on the coffee, the cost of electricity, and how strong and bitter you like your coffee.
    While I drink most of my coffee at work, I also spend around $20 a week on coffee beans for the 2-person household morning coffee, from a store where pretty much all coffee beans costs the same. Because the second best[*] way to reduce bitterness while still having a strong coffee is to use a fast brewer that reduces the time the grounds are exposed to hot water, it also means using more beans. And the price goes up.

    [*]: The best way is to avoid New World and lowland grown coffee.

    If making bitter swill is acceptable, the cost can be kept low. For someone who only drinks one cup a day, I guess enjoying coffee isn't a big part of their life, and you can get away with it. But for people who really enjoy good coffee, this is not a working option.

    There's a line between being frugal and being miserly, and I think we know which side Kevin O'Leary falls on.

  35. Depends by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

    99% of the coffee I drink I fix at home. I generally don't wake up with time for coffee (either homemade or to stop at a store) so I typically tend to drink coffee in the evenings after I get home from work.

    That said, when I go to an actual coffee shop it's more for the experience and to get what I can't really make well at home (eg, my home coffee is just coffee, creamer and sugar, not anything fancy). I kind of view it as an occasional treat. Granted, "coffee shop coffee" is something I do maybe once a month at most so it's not like I'm blowing a fortune on it.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  36. So many people I know need to learn this lesson by mrun4982 · · Score: 1

    I know so many people who are in debt way over their heads and always complain about how they never have any money... right as they're on their way to spend $20 at Starbucks for their whole family (and they do this multiple times a week). Idiots.

  37. Not convenient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You pay for the convenience of not having to fool with it

    If driving to starbucks and standing in line is convenient, then I'd like to know what qualifies as a hassle. Just 5 minutes of waiting is enough to nullify the convenience for me.

    Here's a coffee secret for slashdot: after becoming familiar with a pour-over and how blindingly simple the process of brewing coffee actually is, even a cheap walmart coffee maker seems like a giant overkill. Plus, you can actually clean the pour-over, unlike the inside of your algae -- I mean coffee -- maker.

  38. obligitory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  39. you get what you pay for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While frugality can be wise, it does impact quality of life. I personally have never found a satisfying 20 cent cup of coffee.

    I, too, drink one cup of coffee each morning - home made espresso. After considering the cost of the machine (~$600 with 10 year lifetime), its maintenance (~$50/year), and the cost of high quality Italian coffee beans (~$8/week), I pay somewhere between $1 - $2 each day for my coffee. Hence the $2.50 cost for cafe espresso is not really outrageous. It is also nice to have such an option available when I'm away from home.

    Everyone who samples my homemade brews is amazed at how good a real cup of coffee tastes. It does cost money, though.

    1. Re:you get what you pay for... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your point is reasonable, but for some reason it bothers me that you think that your coffee beans are Italian. Italians buy their coffee beans from the same sources as everyone else: Africa, Indonesia, Central America, etc. They roast them load them on ships and sell them to people like you, at the price of ... over $1 per cup? I really feel like there is still lots of inefficiency in your coffee production chain. Find a good local roaster and experiment with blends and roasts until you nail the flavor you want. Most will be happy to roast 5lb batches for you for much less than what you pay now, and the freshness will make it impossible for your "Italian" coffee to compete.

  40. Re:Running a business has overhead by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    Because the second best[*] way to reduce bitterness while still having a strong coffee is to use a fast brewer that reduces the time the grounds are exposed to hot water, it also means using more beans

    Are you sure about that? Faster brews tend to get the bitter flavours but lose the richness. I drink a mocha / mysore blend and leave it in a cafetiere for about 10-15 minutes and get a rich but not very bitter cup. When I was in a lab with others who had similar coffee tastes to myself, we used a drip filter machine. Both methods have lots of time with the water exposed to the coffee. In contrast, if I try to use the same beans in the espresso machine at work I end up with something bitter and weak.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  41. Enjoy your life if you can by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    I for one enjoy a nice evening in my favorite bar. That can easily run the vicinity of 100 bucks for the evening. Could I save that? Sure, I don't really need to go out for cocktails and cigars. I could actually do the same at home, with equally exquisite spirits and tobacco for much less.

    Since I go there every other week or so, that's about 2500 a year. Give or take. Then again, why should I not do it? Because of the money? So what would I do instead with the money? Invest it? Ok, for what? To have more money? Ok, for what?

    You see, money is a tool to get what I want. And, lo and behold, it already does that. It buys me cocktails and cigars.

    What he's essentially telling you is to forgo whatever you actually want to do and "invest" instead. Because if we really lack something right now, it's money on the investment side. Jeesh.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Enjoy your life if you can by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed his point. Your story indicates you've made a conscious decision to spend $100 once every week or so and it suggests that you've done a reasonable budget analysis for your situation. The two points you should have picked up are

      a) Can you re-create the bar environment so that it costs you less than $100 once every week or so? If so, it makes financial sense to do that.
      b) People are *mindlessly* buying these $2.50 coffees - they are not making the conscious decision to spend that $100 per week on something that is nice to have. Mindless buying plus high margins is good for Starbucks but not so much for the individual buying Starbucks.

    2. Re:Enjoy your life if you can by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      OK, now I get it.

      Guess I really don't understand humans. Why would someone spend money he doesn't have on something he doesn't want?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  42. You couldn't possibly be poor by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Because you didn't have the book smarts for college and the entire manufacturing base was shifted overseas or to Mexico, right? Nope, poor financial decisions for the win.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:You couldn't possibly be poor by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      You really need to re-read the very first statement of my post, which was a qualifier that excludes exactly that scenario.

  43. Re:Running a business has overhead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looking at it that way, indeed, a cup of coffee - what, 30 seconds to decant and serve. 120 per hour, $21.60 per hour cost?

    Well, an American coffeeshop cup of coffee is likely averaging 16 ounces, 1,920 ounces per hour.1.05 oz of beans per cup, 7,875 lbs per hour, and let's be really pessimistic and guess bean cost at $3 per pound, $23.625/hour? Ooh, beans have to cost $2.75/lb to break even.

    Cups and lids gonna cost what, $.25 each Darn, $30/hour. they have to cost $0.05 ea to keep the bean cost at $2.36/lb.

    And we haven't factored in water, machines, rent on the shop. Labor would force all costs above to be half to meet a gross labor cost of $10.80, or a net wage closer to $6.50/hr, which may actually work for bottom-end shops.

    The claim that coffee costs $0.18 per cup to produce is a back of the napkin stupid guess. It goes to hell quickly. But even if it costs $1.05 per cup, that's more than low enough to make it profitable, and, well, profit!

    One of the many things that seem to make sense until you think about it. Now, buying that fabulous dark roast decaf for $16.99/lb costs you about $1.12 per cup, maybe. A pound of coffee would make maybe 288 standard cups of coffee, if you stick to the customary formula. Real world, 108 cups. That's around $0.16/16oz, and ignores water (in your kitchen, negligible $), equipment ($30 press, negligible yearly cost), and of course purchase and maintenance of a cup ($20 acquisition, negligible maintenance, negligible yearly cost). It's an idea, so really this nimrod is pointing out that he's better than me for making a cupa joe at home for $0.18 v. my buying it at the shop for $2.44. He's right. And he needs me to waste my money on the things he invests in to be made. He wins, I merely pretend to leisure.

  44. Pinching pennies is never going to be enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with pinching pennies like that is the tiny bit of savings it gives you is precisely enough to buy jack all. I live in NYC. An apartment here starts at $1 million. I pay $450 a month just for a parking spot. My car insurance is $191 a month on a car I lease for $232 a month. I spend $100 a month just on gas and $121 on a Metrocard. My gym membership is $48 a month. $2.50 a coffee isn't even a rounding error given how expensive everything is. It's what $600 year if you buy one every work day? What am I supposed to do with $600? Buy 7.5% of 1 Bitcoin?

    1. Re:Pinching pennies is never going to be enough by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Add the $600 to the £11676 you'll save each year by ditching the car you don't fucking need and use it to hire a car for the two days a month you actually want to go somewhere the metro doesn't cover.

      That'll leave you $11k a year to invest. It may not pay for a million dollar apartment but hey, you're the fuckwit that wants to live in a stupid overcrowded shithole.

  45. Re:Running a business has overhead by arth1 · · Score: 1

    I think you may confuse acidic with bitter?
    You still get the acids with a fast brew cycle, but the bitter taste takes longer to extract from the grounds. A slow dripper with low temperature (i.e. your typical $30 brewer) extracts very little acid, but a lot of bitterness.

    For acidity, the beans matter a lot too. African highland beans are high in mineral acids (mainly phosphoric acid) while South American beans are high in organic acids (mainly acetic acid).

  46. why becayuse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    msMash is to busy sucking Beauhd's dick for coke..
    how is this news for nerds..

  47. And his coffee maker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting, he is entitled to his choices.
    What I wonder is - if he makes his coffees at home, what coffee machine did he buy? I'd bet it's not a $50 appliance. Did he get a $10,000 coffee maker? Did he work that figure in his depreciation/investment calculations?

  48. The richest man in the cemetery by CustomSolvers2 · · Score: 1

    Being so cautious with expenses if you have serious money problems makes some sense. Not wanting to spend too much on what you don't like seems quite sensible too; or other attitudes on these lines like not enjoying excessive luxury. But having more than enough money and caring about each single penny seems a quite negative attitude for that person and everyone else. Although it seems much worse to seriously think that a relevant wealth can be generated via carefully managing your money. Rich people are rich because they either were born rich or did a quite relevant effort (usually not precisely consisting in honest, hard work) to get there. The more you have, the more likely is that you can easily get more even despite a negligent management; or, in simpler terms, a rich idiot will probably always be rich and idiot.

    Anecdotally, I have stopped drinking cafeteria coffee recently too, but only as a way to reduce my caffeine daily intake. I have always shared/spent all the money I had and will continue doing exactly the same thing for as long as possible. I am certainly (kind of) poor, mainly lately when I have decided to stop tolerating in-hurry, pushy and unfair arbitrariness and to focus on doing a proper work under proper conditions. If my behaviour was more money-saving-prone, now I would have a bit more money, a bit more fear (of losing it) and would have enjoyed/made enjoy others much less. I wouldn't have been rich under absolutely any circumstance, at least by having kept my principles and dignity intact. Ideally, it might have been possible via hard over-work and by provoking the wealth of practical people to be increased (e.g., you lend me some money, give me enough time, I earn enough for me and for you and we both win); but, as I have learned during the last years, this is an unrealistic fantasy: people are too stupid to allow everyone-winning scenarios.

    --
    Custom Solvers 2.0 = Alvaro Carballo Garcia = varocarbas.
  49. This begs the question.. by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Does Kevin O'Leary own one or many coffee shops? If not, maybe that $2.50 for a cup of coffee isn't as ridiculous as he would make it seem. He's making it sound like it is printing money, surely an intelligent business person would want a huge part of that.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  50. Re:Running a business has overhead by Nos. · · Score: 2

    This is a really bad way to view things.

    I've had people tell me the same thing about why they pay for certain services. Say I make $50/hour. I can paint my own room or pay someone $15/hour to do it. (we'll assume supplies are a fixed price either way, so the only difference is the hourly rate). Let's say it takes 4 hours. Some would say that paying someone $60 to do the job make sense, because in that time I could earn $200, putting me $140 ahead. But that's not necessarily the case. For me to earn that $200, I actually have to be working, not painting my room. So paying someone to do it actually puts me $60 behind.

    Same thing for anyone. If he's sitting at the table reading the paper while the coffee brews, he's not reducing his earnings. If he's paying someone to do it for him, he's still not earning anything, and he's paying out of pocket more than it would cost him to do it himself.

  51. Re:It's hard to buy a cup of coffee for under a bu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The simple truth is if you want a cup of coffee while you're out and about, you're going to be spending > $1 because nobody is selling a cup of coffee for less than that.

    Depends on your needs for atmosphere. Plenty of gas stations will sell coffee for less than $1 per cup (and usually in generously-sized cups), but they're not places to kick back, relax and whip out your laptop, they're places to get your shit and get out. You're paying the premium on that coffee for the real estate, not the actual drink. Hell, my local grocery has a free self-service coffee stand for shoppers, and I've seen plenty of people come in just to get coffee and leave.

    It's easy to find cheap coffee in the wild, but people also want safe, quiet spaces in which to enjoy it. And for that, they're willing to pay ridiculous fees.

  52. Re:Running a business has overhead by tburkhol · · Score: 1

    I think this is another of the great falsehoods foisted off on the world. I mean, sure - if you're talking about the CEO interrupting a business negotiation to go make himself coffee, then yeah, that's wasting value. This guy is talking about putting on the coffee maker while he eats his morning granola. He's not going to use those extra 2 minutes to analyze a new investment or close a buyout, even if you add up the two minutes every day for 20 years. It's the same reason no sane person hires staff to tie their shoes.

  53. Kombucha is the new Coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kombucha seems to be following the same trend. It is pretty damn cheap in raw materials for everything except maybe the fruit that goes into it. They charge crazy high prices for some fermented black tea, a little sugar and a 1/2 cup of fruit.

  54. Reductio ad absurdum by Daetrin · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Good advice! But you can do better! Don't eat food at restaurants, you can cook food at home for a lot cheaper! And don't drink beer at a pub, you can drink beer at home for less than a dollar a bottle! Actually, why drink alcohol at all when you can get water for free? Just travel straight from work to home every day and have your break and water for dinner. But why have a home when you could just buy a cheap used van and get a gym membership? You can get a hot pot to cook ramen and eat vitamins and you should be fine! And after a year or two of that you should have enough money saved up that you can go buy some cheap property hundreds of miles away from civilization, get a few basic tools and some seeds and you can build your own log cabin and grow your own food! And don't worry about farming equipment, tens of thousands years ago people got by just by poking holes in the ground with a stick, so you can do the same! You'll never have to spend any money on anything ever again!

    More seriously, i'm not going to say that saving money isn't a good thing, but everyone has to make their own decisions about what compromises they're willing to make for that, because making every decision on the basis of what will save you money can lead to some pretty weird behaviour. Some things just aren't worth the trouble. And honestly if you've got a net worth of several hundred million like Kevin O'Leary the amount you can reasonably spend on overpriced coffee is practically a rounding error. And ultimately, what are you saving all that money for if not to make your life a little more comfortable and enjoyable? If you live a miserable life but die with millions in the bank do you think you've "won" at life somehow?

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re:Reductio ad absurdum by RazorSharp · · Score: 1

      If you live a miserable life but die with millions in the bank do you think you've "won" at life somehow?

      We could call this the Ebenezer Scrooge Fallacy.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    2. Re:Reductio ad absurdum by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Good advice! But you can do better! Don't eat food at restaurants, you can cook food at home for a lot cheaper! And don't drink beer at a pub, you can drink beer at home for less than a dollar a bottle! Actually, why drink alcohol at all when you can get water for free? Just travel straight from work to home every day and have your break and water for dinner. But why have a home when you could just buy a cheap used van and get a gym membership? You can get a hot pot to cook ramen and eat vitamins and you should be fine! And after a year or two of that you should have enough money saved up that you can go buy some cheap property hundreds of miles away from civilization, get a few basic tools and some seeds and you can build your own log cabin and grow your own food! And don't worry about farming equipment, tens of thousands years ago people got by just by poking holes in the ground with a stick, so you can do the same! You'll never have to spend any money on anything ever again!

      As the years go by and it continues to look like I will never in my entire life get to the point that I don't owe someone money just for the right to exist in a place, I've been feeling more and more guilty about not having done that my entire life. By now I can afford to buy a plot of land in the middle of nowhere, and probably afford to buy a manufactured home and have it installed out there, and then... go sit alone in my trailer in the middle of the desert, depressed and miserable for the rest of my life, until I decide to kill myself (in which case, may as well just do that now and get it over with). But I ought to, according to the advice on the internet; the reason I have problems is because I want to continue living where I was born and raised and always lived, and not leave behind all my family and friends and job and the woman who would be my wife if we could afford to live together (who wouldn't follow me there, I've asked). But according to everyone else, not doing that is the root of all my problems, and the fact that I could just go die alone in the desert but choose not to means those problems are all my own fault.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
  55. Real coffee! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mocha ,frapo blah blah . You need to drink coffee like it is meant to drink, you ground beans and put it in the water so much when you put tea spoon in it to mix it it doesn't sink, then you pour it in your cup and drink it , no sugar no cream no fancy-schmancy .

  56. I thought it was just beacuse he was a cheap POS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure I've ever seen anybody as arrogant, cheap, and downright stupid as that guy. He's an insult to Canada, and when he dies, I hope they toss him into a crude hole, since a proper funeral costs a hell of a lot more than a cup of coffee. On that note, I'm surprised he doesn't just grow his own beans and shit... because that would cost even less!

  57. O'Leary should buy two cemetery plots... by daftdada · · Score: 0

    One for himself and one for his money, cheap b*stard.
     

  58. He probably lives in NYC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He could live in Arkansas for a quarter of the cost and reinvest. Look at the order of magnitude in the transgression...

    Yawn.

  59. "Instead, he makes it at home." by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    Truth is, he gets to make it at home. That's a nice perk.

    For many of us, the truth is steeped a bit more harshly. Many working American's are commuting for hours, running around trying ensure we meet all our government obligations (auto-inspections, permits, etc). Then we have personal obligations (feed the kids, fold the laundry, do the dishes, etc, etc).

    I wager he is not dealing with most of those things. And as such, it is very easy to brew your own coffee when you can sit around for 15 minutes or so. Now granted, he may be brewing K-Cups, which is a fast alternative, and also a large part of the reason K-cups are so popular.

    But even more of a question, why is our society structure so !@#$% up that we need to rely upon trillions of gallons of coffee? Perhaps because our society doesn't let our human bodies and minds receive the rest they need.

    1. Re:"Instead, he makes it at home." by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Run the drip machine while you shower in the morning, or get a model with a timer so the brew is freshly done when you wake up. In the spirit of Slashdot, you could even rig your old drip machine with a timer relay and automate it that way. Just add water and coffee in the evening, and *boom* fresh coffee in the morning.

      Then add that coffee to a thermos, bring it to work. It'll be a million times better (and much cheaper) than any coffee you could buy on your commute, and it'll save you time.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  60. He contradicts himself. by elistan · · Score: 1
    And yet he advocates for establishging a "fun money" fund. What is coffee if not a fun daily ritual?

    Many people who commit themselves 100% to eliminating debt and saving money find that a certain joylessness creeps in after a while. The same thing happens to dieters who deprive themselves of all their favorite foods for months, and then cave to late-night binges.

    That's not a way to live, and that's not what I advocate. Austerity, yes; deprivation, no.

    The key is to include spending on fun things in your budget. Set aside a manageable percentage every week in a fund that will let you splurge with cash. Go out for lunch, get your hair done, or use your fun money to go on a vacationâ"do whatever you want, as long as you pay for it outright. This way you can enjoy your splurges without feeling guilty!

    Or is he specifically saying that haircuts = good but coffee = bad for some reason?

  61. McDonlads best choice on the go.$1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    McDonalds is $1. If you cant make it home, next best thing.

  62. Really,??? by PortHaven · · Score: 2

    Cause for many of us Gen-X'ers, investments haven't even broken even. Heck, we're going to be the first generation to pay more into Social Security than we'll get back.

    That about sums up investing for Gen-X'ers.

    1. Re:Really,??? by redmasq · · Score: 1

      Cause for many of us Gen-X'ers, investments haven't even broken even. Heck, we're going to be the first generation to pay more into Social Security than we'll get back.

      That about sums up investing for Gen-X'ers.

      I'm on the line between Gen-X'er and Millennial. After considering taxes and fees, my mutual fund near about breaks even: if sold, there would be just about enough left over to buy a grande latte and leave a decent tip. :-P

    2. Re:Really,??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you're doing things wrong. Allow me to introduce you to the worlds worst market timer, who did only one thing right.

      He didn't sell. Buy and hold, use index funds, a mix with some bonds heavily weighted towards stocks.
      http://awealthofcommonsense.com/2014/02/worlds-worst-market-timer/

  63. Re:Yeah! Why pay more than 5$ for a bottle of wine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But if someone is willing to spend 250$ of his/her hard earned money voluntarily who am I to object?

    It depends. If someone is doing that while also complaining about poverty, you'd be a sense-talking human to object. Or if not object, to mock them, pointing and laughing in their face, helping them to become aware of themselves.

    That's all this is about. Most people are extravagant in some way (there is something you do that I think is crazy, and there's something I do that you think is crazy) and it's all good until someone complains that their extravagance is costing them too much money. As soon as someone opens their mouth, that's when they prove themselves to have erred.

    It's all fine until they complain.

    And then it's time to be merciless.

  64. Small revenue stream extraction by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

    People complain about things like cable bills, then pay almost the same amount to subscribe to 20 music, movie and game clouds every month. Isn't this where the economy is supposed to be going? On the Microsoft side of the house, both businesses and consumers are renting their software every month, paying for it over and over again. The whole idea is to get consumers used to the idea of parting with small streams of money forever rather than paying once for something. If Starbucks had a monthly subscription program, I'm sure millions of people would subscribe. If you can get people to think of it as $x per month rather than $4000x over your lifetime, you win...it's the same tactic car dealers use to sell expensive leases or hide the true price of buying a car.

    I admit that I have a daily coffee habit, but all I buy is coffee...I draw the line at $5 espresso drinks. But what's wrong with allowing people to enjoy themselves a little? All it is for me is a break from the time I drop my kids off at school to the time I go to work...it could be anything else but I picked coffee. As long as people are not blowing money required to survive, we only have a limited number of trips around the Sun. I think people who gamble are mentally challenged, but I don't sit and complain outside of casinos. Having a successful investor tell people they could be exactly like him if only they gave up coffee sounds like the guy from Australia complaining that Millenials can't buy houses because they buy avocado toast.

    There's nothing wrong with saving, and I'm reasonably frugal in the rest of my life. We spend our money on stuff like home improvements that actually make sense and improve our daily living conditions. But living like a monk is just going to make you miserable...Scrooge is a very good example for this time of year come to think of it. The key to being happy in a society like ours is to realize that short of an extremely good run of luck, most of us are going to be regular people making regular money. Nothing wrong with hard work, but don't labor under the illusion that if you just work a little harder or buy less coffee, you too can be a billionaire celebrity.

  65. savings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the part about the coffee is just an example (clickbait), but the point he makes is that you can take 10% of your income and invest it in something solid (not bitcoin ;) and you will be better off in 15 years instead of just having a lot of empty starbucks cups. The same applies to renting movies, buying expensive clothes, or anything else that's optional expenses. every little bit makes a big difference because of compounded interest

  66. Because he's an asshole. by iCEBaLM · · Score: 2

    /thread

  67. He's a Wine Guy by josefresco · · Score: 1

    Ask him instead about wine - which from what I gather from what he says on Shark Tank, is where he real passion is. 20 cent coffee maybe, but he probably follows that with a $$$ wine come evening.

  68. And yet ... by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    And yet, SBUX shares are up $1.45 today, and for me, up ~1300% from when I bought some. I don't frequent their stores very often, but apparently a lot of people do. But if you like, say, their French Roast, you can buy big bags of it at Costco for cheap (and it's often on sale for $5 off per bag), and crank out a cup of that dark brew for a fraction of the walk-up costs, and ground/brewed exactly as you personally like it.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  69. After certain amount of money by future+assassin · · Score: 2

    how much more do you need? Being obsessed with investing the $2 you saved on a coffee is insane.

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:After certain amount of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how much more do you need? Being obsessed with investing the $2 you saved on a coffee is insane.

      You don't get to a state of having more money than you need if your spend as fast as you earn.

      Do you think people grow rich by making good decisions for a few decades, then change their habits to spend money on things they think are wasteful just because they can?

  70. Re:Running a business has overhead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've seen this point of view taken on a few times over this discussion and I wonder how many of you that say this really calculate your time this way. Do you think about how much time "costs" you when you watch a football game or a movie? Do you think of what the expense of your time is when you play games or fidget with your cellphones? How much did it cost you to post about something this meaningless on Slashdot?
     
    I'm sure some of you really are very productive and make the most of it but my guess is that the vast majority of Slashdotters waste tons of time as they scoff at people who drop a few bucks for coffee.

  71. Trickle down by losfromla · · Score: 2

    This is just an illustration of how trickle down economics is utter bullshit. Of course the past 30 years of economic stagnation for the formerly middle class in the USA has also clearly demonstrated that fact. Trickle down is a front for wealth concentration at the top and extraction from the bottom. The repugnant tax cut the repugnicans are currently attempting to cram through congress is the latest escalation in the economic slaughter being visited upon us by the 1%.

    --
    Only I can judge you.
  72. Actually no by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    that's not true. Not even a little bit. There's two ways rich people invest:

    a. Shotgun approach. Invest in everything that comes your way. You lose money on 90% but the 10% is so profitable it pays for the other 90%, plus you write the 90% off on your taxes anyway.

    b. HFT, or High Frequency Trading. Basically rent seeking.

    There's also a third method, the good 'ole boys network, where you get told in advance where to put your money. Remember, it's not illegal if you don't get caught. And what happens on the golf course stays on the golf course.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Actually no by chispito · · Score: 1

      that's not true. Not even a little bit.

      The rest of what you wrote is nice, but is a bit of a straw man argument. My original statement was

      One of the ways people get rich is by recognizing good and bad investments

      You're talking about how rich people invest, not about investments that can make you rich. And there are so many ways people have successfully invested their money that have nothing to do with high frequency trading or your shotgun approach--unless you're talking about a diversified buy and hold portfolio, in which case I agree--that I find your general premise very lacking in imagination.

      There are lots of comfortably, though not necessarily fabulously, wealthy people who became as much by sound investment and disciplined living. It is not a guarantee, but I can very nearly guarantee you that investing $2.30 a day ($2.50 minus the cost of a home made cup) in something reasonable will give you better results than buying a cup of coffee at a chain. Even if it's $575 a year in a mutual fund.

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  73. Go to work, drink their coffee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even better deal than this guy's...

    Had one employer start charging 50 cents to squirt hot water through the flavia packs.
    Brought a 4 cup coffee maker to my desk and a pair of scissors.

    1. Re:Go to work, drink their coffee. by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Charging employees for coffee is just about the pettiest thing I've heard about in a long time.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    2. Re:Go to work, drink their coffee. by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      If you have a soda vending machine in the office, they are doing the same thing, just more discreetly.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    3. Re:Go to work, drink their coffee. by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      We don't have vending machines, but you can buy a soda in the cafeteria. But soda is different. Coffee is healthy and a productivity booster. Soda is crap for you and makes you lethargic.

      You may disagree of course, but that is the reasoning.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  74. Kevin is full of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As someone who has seen nearly every Shark Tank and started multiple businesses, I normally appreciate Kevin. Here he is totally full of crap.

    Kevin did not get rich saving pennies on coffee, just like Buffet did not get rich investing in a diversified mutual fund portfolio or even the S&P.

    Never listen to what these liars SAY. Look at what they DO.

    Saving a few dollars a day on coffee is meaningless. What you need to watch are the big expenses: mortgages, car loans, student loans, credit cards. Run lean, save your cash, and use it to find opportunities to generate more cash flow, then maybe you can replicate Kevin.

  75. The best way to save money on coffee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... is to not drink it at all.

    1. Re:The best way to save money on coffee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's something to consider. Drinking a tall glass of cold water also gives a pickmeup in the morning.

  76. I pay for the time and workspace by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    I don't give a shit about the coffee or whatever overpriced shitty beverage I'm drinking, or crappy dried out husk of overpriced muffin.

    I'm paying for a high bandwidth web connection, a plugin, a decent chair and work area, and a bathroom for an hour or two - I buy their goods because I feel like I really should be paying them for their availability, and $5-6 isn't unreasonable.

    Although some places have some colossally shitty musicians polluting the airspace, they should refund me for listening to that.

    --
    -Styopa
  77. What about his love of fine wine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is obviously a man who doesn't like coffee, or only has a Starbucks in their neighborhood.

    This statement comparing his 18 cent cup of coffee to a well made espresso is ridiculous. The man is an affirmed wine aficionado (according to Wikipedia). Why does he waste so much money on expensive wine when he can buy two-buck-chuck down the road and save tons of money?

    The comparison isn't the exact same, I know. A cup of coffee is WAY cheaper than a bottle of wine.

    I don't know anyone who drinks coffee from a coffee shop every day. I would completely agree that it's a waste-- but I think this is a straw man argument from someone justifying their fortune. "I am way richer than you because you waste money on frivolous things". It's a clear statement intended to paint the poor and middle class as stupid and wasteful and the upper class as intelligent and thrifty.

    I'm sure he's a smart guy, and is way smarter with his money than most people. I won't fault him for his success, and think he deserves a great deal of it. But this kind of smarmy statement is nothing more than a ploy to justify the growing inequality between the rich and poor.

    If you go to a coffee shop on the weekends to get a real, well made, cafe latte, I think that's a perfectly justifiable expenditure if you really like coffee.

    Otherwise Mr. O'Leary better ditch his love of wines, that money could be far better spent by investing.

  78. Coffee snobs by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

    Came to the thread to read posts from snooty coffee snobs describing perfect beans while deriding harried salarymen (and women) for buying a cuppa joe on their way to work.

    Was not disappointed.

    1. Re:Coffee snobs by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      The hipster stank is quite strong.

      I love that I get a perfectly good (great, even!) cup of coffee using a $5 funnel, the cheapest possible filters, a blade grinder and a $10 electric kettle. The only thing I've found that really matters is getting decent quality beans and grinding them yourself right before you brew.

      And yet we have these insufferable snobs who insist on overcomplicating everything. It's. Just. A. Cup. Of. Coffee.

      I've been through the whole rigmarole of French press, Moka pot, Aeropress and a few other gadgets. Sure, they make damn good coffee (the Aeropress in particular), but so does the good ol' filter. With so much less hassle and faffing about. Admittedly, I haven't felt the need to get an actual espresso machine, but I take the Italian approach and only get espresso at good coffee shops, because you basically cannot match that at home in any sort of economically responsible way.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  79. Well yes... by Casandro · · Score: 1

    and typically such advice ends up saying that you only need to save $50 a day, then invest it at an interest rate of only 10% and you'll be a millionaire within a couple of decades, ignoring that interest rates are low and $50 a day is a lot of money for most people.

    1. Re:Well yes... by Casandro · · Score: 0

      The obvious reason why rich people are doing it, is to blame poor people for being stupid. It's the only way they can bear with the fact that most, if not all, rich people are rich by pure chance or inheritance.

  80. 850$ here, 850$ there , small drop make a flow by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Look at all the expense you do which are small , you don't bat an eye to do, and yet you could get cheaper elsewhere like coffee. You would be surprised how much that makes at the end.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  81. That's bullshit in Kevin O'Leary by jonfr · · Score: 1

    First of all. This is bullshit that he's claiming. The $2.50 covers the salary of the person making the coffee and everything connected to it (overcharging is always a possibility, but if the market is healthy that should not happen). He is free to make it at home for $0.18 as he does now but the pricing is there for a reason. When he says that he is investing $2.32 that is nonsense. His investments are built on a wealth that his parents established early in 20th century and he inherited once they passed.
     

  82. Myth of frugality by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
    Of course, if you save $2 a day every working day, then you pocket about $500 per year. Okay, but not an earth-shattering sum. (You could spend the $2 bucks buying coffee for your boss every morning, and get a bigger raise each year....)

    Kevin O'Leary didn't get rich scrimping on coffee. He got rich selling a software company, and stayed rich by marketing himself. Not buying coffee from coffee shops is part of building the "Kevin O'Leary" brand mystique, not a meaningful way to build substantial wealth. When he gets to the office, he'll have assistants who are happy to brew a pot for him.

    --
    ~Idarubicin
  83. Forgot to mention time of worth by k6mfw · · Score: 1

    Big question is how much is your time worth? When I get coffee, I get typical 'murican coffee (no cream or sugar, just black). I also consider how long will it take? I don't earn as much as Oleary but waiting in line behind several other people getting some kind of frappa macca moca that takes five minutes to make... $2.50 is nothing compared to how much worth per hour.

    --
    mfwright@batnet.com
  84. Basically this guy has wasted his life. by sunking2 · · Score: 1

    If you've accumulated the money he is and still isn't spending it then he may as well not even made it at all. What a waste.

    I also suspect he's lying in that he frequently buys things that are much more than his cups of coffee saved just because he can.

    I bet he doesn't drive a 1992 Escort for instance.

  85. Oranges or apples? by jimbo · · Score: 1

    That's good, I assume he's spending all those coffee savings on his famous Olive Oil collection instead.

  86. Scrooge ate out! by Bruce66423 · · Score: 1

    Surprisingly enough to our minds, but totally consistent with his approach to life, the fact that as a man he couldn't be expected to cook, and that the alternative would be the more expensive option of employing someone.

    Incidentally has anyone done a film of A Christmas Carol with a female Scrooge?

    1. Re:Scrooge ate out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure Brazzers took care of that one.

  87. Nespresso by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea,

    pretty good, like 0.80$ per cup.
    No cleanup in the morning, decent espresso (get the ristretto capsules).

    Fast, you can recycle the capsules in a provided UPS bag if you are eco conscious.

    The the espresso machine I use in the evening and weekends. No steaming milk, just a splash of half and half is good enough for me.

  88. Things add up by TJHook3r · · Score: 1

    I don't get the people who pay for little treats all the damn time. It's like they need constant rewards or they'll just stay in bed.

  89. Re:Running a business has overhead by Quirkz · · Score: 2

    Yep. I'm surprised at how few people see it this way. Or maybe I'm surprised at how many people have access to infinite amounts of overtime or other hourly work, and when presented with a choice between doing other things or just working more and hiring a service, go for the service.

    That said, it's not always unwise to pay for the service. Unpaid personal time has a value, too. Hiring someone to paint your room so that you can be out with friends or family, having fun, or just getting rest, may be a perfectly sensible choice. It varies a lot based on time, income, preferences, and circumstance.

    For instance, I'll drink the free coffee at work most days, and usually make it at home on weekends. But I'll splurge on a fancy latte maybe once a month just because I want something different. And if I'm traveling, well, I'll buy whatever's around, but tend to pay a premium because a lot of times the basic stuff has been sitting around for hours getting burnt, which I find unappealing.

  90. Re:It's hard to buy a cup of coffee for under a bu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can get a large coffee at mcd for about a dollar. Its actually usually decent too. To top it off they'll even add the sugar and creme for you if you want, cause trying to do that in a car cup holder sucks.

  91. Re:It's hard to buy a cup of coffee for under a bu by green1 · · Score: 1

    But are you "out and about", or are you simply moving from home (where coffee is cheap) to work (where coffee may also be cheap, or even free) but stopping in between to get coffee? If it's the latter, then maybe you DO have another option.

  92. cute baristas... by gosand · · Score: 1

    Pink Sugar Espresso (and places like them) would beg to differ on that one. As would I.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  93. Re:Yeah! Why pay more than 5$ for a bottle of wine by Cederic · · Score: 1

    I would never pay more than 5$ for a bottle of wine. Because I am a teetotaler.

    I don't drink wine. I have however found that paying between 2-3 times the supermarket minimum price for a bottle of wine gets you a far better wine that's still a sensible price and goes over much much better when you visit friends and give them a bottle as a gift.

  94. Value added by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kevin O'Leary is the kind of guy who pay big money to visit a high class hooker and whines when he arrives about paying £1 for the Pay and Display parking meter. I know because I've had clients like this.

    I always offer clients hospitality drinks. After we're done socialising when time versus money are calculated I'm charging ten times what branded outlets charge for the same thing albeit with the client kissing me and caressing my thighs. I cannot recall a client who has finished their tea before we have sex.

    1. Re:Value added by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Kevin is gay? With your post, you are obviously not a hooker, you are a geek who still stays at your moms basement.

  95. Take it another step further... by gosand · · Score: 1

    I feel the same way. It's not that I don't ever buy a coffee somewhere, but it's a rare thing. For one, I like black coffee and most places cover up their terrible coffee with sugar and milk and flavorings. And it really stinks to buy a coffee somewhere and it be terrible. At home, I know what I am getting.

    On a similar note, if anyone goes out to bars and spends money at them, they are wasting it.
    Sure, there's the social aspect, especially if you are single... but just know that you are paying a fee for that in the extreme markup of drinks.
    Want to save money, or spend it on other things, buy your own alcohol and don't go to bars. Or if you do, just drink water.

    What does a beer cost these days at a bar? Depends on brand, but let's say $5 + $1 tip. For the price of 2 beers you can probably buy a 6-pack at the store. So you are paying a 3x premium. Same goes for wine and spirits. It's crazy. I'm not cheap, but I'd rather buy a decent bottle of bourbon and enjoy it than 4 drinks at the bar.

    I don't agree with the idea that you should do it to invest it, investments are risky. You should do it because it makes sense. Or don't... it's your money.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  96. Re:Running a business has overhead by Nos. · · Score: 1

    I absolutely agree there are times when paying someone to do a job has other, non-monetary benefits, ranging from freeing up personal time, quality of the work, ability/knowledge to do the work, etc. These can all be very good reasons to pay someone to do something for you.

  97. Don't spend your money, give it to companies by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

    Whatever you do, don't spend a dollar of your money on anything you want. Consider your money to actually be the money of all the companies that exist on the stock market. Be sure to invest every single nickel you have, and hopefully you'll die before you retire.

  98. It's an indicator by Solandri · · Score: 1

    If you buy things like Starbucks coffee, it's an indicator that you prioritize convenience and instant gratification over sound money management and working towards a goal. So it's $850/yr for coffee. $2500/yr on fast food instead of home-made meals. $3000/yr because you leased a nicer model car than you could afford instead of buying a more practical car. $6750/yr on higher interest payments on your home mortgage because you took whatever the bank was offering instead of researching a better loan. $3750/yr on interest payments on the credit card balance you're carrying because you just gotta buy that TV, stereo, computer, latest video game, concert tickets, whatever Right Now instead of waiting until you've actually saved up the money to afford it. etc. It all adds up.

    For most people, this is the difference between making other people rich (the fast food franchise owner, car dealership, the bank, the credit card company, etc), and becoming rich themselves. It always baffled me how so many people say they're upset at the 1%, yet freely hand over their money to the 1% via their everyday purchase decisions.

  99. Re:Running a business has overhead by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

    It costs me about a dollar a cup. I have the boring simple drip coffee maker pot. I have to make a minimal of 4 cups or it doesn't work correctly. And so I generally waste most of my coffee I make.

    Are most drip coffee makers like this? Maybe this is part of the reason people buy stuff at Starbucks or wherever.

  100. Sleep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you get enough sleep at night, you don't need coffee.

  101. Re:It's hard to buy a cup of coffee for under a bu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .... It sucks, but what can you do? ...

    Plan ahead a bit.

    I fill a thermos with fresh ground and brewed coffee every morning. Better than any long-line drive-thru or the K-crap machine at work.

    This has served me well for years. As much as I want to drink for the day at less than the cost of a single K-cup, and far less than any size from coffee shop.

  102. The real story of Kevin O'Leary's career by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.nationalobserver.com/2016/01/26/news/real-and-shocking-story-kevin-olearys-business-career

  103. but what kind of car does he drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A used car $10 k will do you fine. You think that's what he drives? Nope, me neither.

    so yeah, sure he saves coffee money. but lets drop this bs lecture about frugality. people have preferences, and just because they don't spend the money like you they should, doesn't mean they spent it wrong. I spend mine on coffee, and drive a pos car. and that's how I effin like it.

  104. Apples and Oranges by jtara · · Score: 1

    He is comparing apples and oranges, but at the same time makes a good point - if not very clearly.

    The quality, style, and presentation of coffee does not matter to him. He just wants a basic cup o'Joe. He can make that at home for a few pennies, and it's actually more convenient than going to the coffee shop.

    I suspect that the vast majority of sheeples that go to Starbucks also care not a bit about the quality, style, or presentation of coffee either. Otherwise, they would be at a good independent coffee shop, and not at Starbucks!

    It's not valid, though, to compare a cup of Chock-Full-of-Nuts made in the drip machine at home with an artisan cup of espresso, latte', cappuccino, etc.

    The capital cost of doing this (WELL) at home, is fairly high. Sorry, no, that $10 or $20 blade grinder from Amazon will not do the same job as the high-end burr grinder they use at the shop. No, your drip machine will not make anything approaching a good espresso machine.

    A few years ago, I invested $400 in a good burr grinder (Mazzer Mini) and $800 on a piston-lever style espresso machine (Elektra Micro Casa a'Leva). Aside, I think the only consumer purchase I've ever made that has actually appreciated. (The Micro Casa has doubled in price in the mean time... my late 2012 Mac Mini comes close, having retained it value... it's a much-sought Unicorn).

    I jokingly calculated the cost-per-cup for a short time after I bought this rig. My first cup was the $1200 cup of espresso!

    OK, so 10 years later, it has more than paid for itself.

    Rough back of envelope: every two weeks or so I walk across the street to the artisan coffee roaster, and pay $15 for a bag of covfefe beans. I also drop $3 on a properly-made Macchiato. (Which you will not find at Starbucks.) But I will ignore that one cup, and just call it $15. I make one cappuccino every morning, so that's about 30 cups. 45 - 15, I have saved $30. * 24 I could have saved $720/year, if it weren't for my extravagant habit of one shop-made coffee every two weeks. I could have saved $7200 over the 10 years, so my capital cost was sunk a long time ago. (Oops, one $400 trip the repair shop...)

    But, you can see, even so, this is not a .20 cup of coffee. It's a 0.50 cup of coffee in beans alone. Add a naive $5 for the share of the capital cost (ignoring opportunity cost), now you are at $20 / 30 = 0.66. If you add opportunity cost (I could have invested that $1200 10 years ago) we're well over $1/cup.

    Now add what can be a very expensive retail lease in well-trafficked locations, cost of equipment, furnishings, leasehold improvements, employee cost, other costs of operations (utilities, disposables, etc. etc.) $2.50 isn't an unreasonable cost at all.

    With the recent craze for "cold brew" coffee, there is a new wrinkle: inventory management and waste. Always been an issue for beans (having beans in stock that are not too new and not too old, and kept from oxidation). Customers expect cold brew to be made over-night and be fresh. A good place will toss what is left at the end of the day. They have to predict every day how much cold brew they will need. They will either have waste at the end of the day, or unhappy customers who cannot buy the cold brew they wanted.

    I will occasionally make a cup of French Press, in an insulated stainless steel Freling press. It's a hassle, though, since I have to adjust the grind and then adjust it back for espresso. If French Press is your thing, you can avoid most of the capital cost.

    If it MATTERS to you, seek out a good local artisanal shop, buy your own equipment and find a good source of beans (NOT Trader Joe!. Please NOT bagged Starbucks!). Skip Starbucks, but you already knew that if it matters to you. Find something else that you over-spend on every day and cut THAT.

    If it doesn't matter, stop spending the money on garbage over-roasted coffee at a cost that is unreasonable for your wants. At the same time, stop blaming Starbucks for the cost. It's not the huge margin business you've been imagining it is.

    1. Re:Apples and Oranges by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Or just make some good old drip coffee instead of bothering with the hipster nonsense.

      --
      Eat the rich.
  105. Demonstrates a Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So doesn't this guys philosophy, if shared by many of the wealthy, demonstrate that trickle down does not work? Aren't we allowing the rich to keep more of their tax dollars so they DO purchase that $2.50 coffee with it?

  106. never again by NikeHerc · · Score: 1

    I've never been a fan of Starbucks coffee, seriously overpriced and it tastes like crap. I'd buy it in airports, but that was it. Some months ago Starbucks announced they planned to hire 10,000 illegal immigrants. That means those 10,000 jobs won't go to American citizens. You're dead to me, Starbucks. I will never spend another dime in your disgusting establishments. If there are patriots among /. readers, I encourage you to avoid Starbucks as well.

    --
    Circle the wagons and fire inward. Entropy increases without bounds.
  107. If I lived in his house, maybe I'd do that too by istartedi · · Score: 1

    This is the problem with looking at everything through the prism of a balance sheet. You wanna save every dollar? Fine. Stay holed up in your shack and DIY everything. It's not about the coffee. It's about an affordable escape for a while. Get out of the house. See what struggling local artists are doing. Run into people with common interests, or just look cool behind your device while sneaking peeks at other people looking cool behind their devices. Simultaneously catch eachother. Start a relationship, find true love... or live like a hermit and literally die of loneliness; but hey, at least some distant cousin will get an unexpected windfall of freshly sterilized bank notes found next to your corpse.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  108. fire the editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the fuck is THIS crap doing on Slashdot?

  109. What do you do when entire industries by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    are moved overseas? What do you do in the face of rapidly encroaching automation? Not everything is in your control. All the time here on /. I hear people say kids these days shouldn't borrow $160k to go to college but learn a trade instead. But even if you do that what happens if you pick the wrong trade.

    There was just a story about a neo-Nazi (actual neo-Nazi, as in has Mein Kampf on his bookshelf) loosing his job at Applebees because he got interviewed by one of the left wing mags and his boss caught wind of it. Thing is, he was a welder between gigs. I can't tell you the number of right wingers who, when they hear me complain about my kid's college bills tell me she should be a welder. They point to high wages and ignore the lack of steady work. I guess if you want to live on the road. Good luck starting a family like that.

    Is it just me, or are we, the working class, always being told to work harder for less? When I was a kid we were supposed to work less for more.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:What do you do when entire industries by Kohath · · Score: 1

      are moved overseas? What do you do in the face of rapidly encroaching automation? Not everything is in your control.

      You do what you can to improve the things that are in your control. Obviously. WTF else? Give up and wait for a rescue that will never come?

      All the time here on /. I hear people say kids these days shouldn't borrow $160k to go to college but learn a trade instead. But even if you do that what happens if you pick the wrong trade.

      Try again then. Something else. WTF is the alternative? Feeling sorry for yourself?

      [Weird story deleted.]

      Is it just me, or are we, the working class, always being told to work harder for less? When I was a kid we were supposed to work less for more.

      Versus what? Not working and blaming others for the fact that you can’t get ahead without working?

      Unemployment is at 4%.

  110. Meanwhile by n329619 · · Score: 1

    $2.50 is a sufficiently small amount that it's not worth keeping track of.

    Meanwhile, $0.99 for an app!?!??! So expensive!

  111. Please by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

    He spent more money on his suit than the average person spends on a lifetime of coffee.

  112. Story time. by WolfgangVL · · Score: 1

    My girlfriend had a 3x/day Starbucks habit 7 days a week when we met. It blew me away, $12/15 dollars a day. Worse than smoking. I've still never seen coffee addiction like that since.

    Our first Christmas together I bought her a nice espresso machine, a big giant box of Starbucks beans, grinder, the shitty paper cups, tiny little ceramic coffee mugs, a hipster jazz CD... everything she needed to replicate the experience if she just did it herself. It cost me a pretty penny, but way less than she was spending, and it was a damn impressive gift.

    In the card I explained that this gift was not only a fancy coffee maker with all the fixings, but was also at least a $4000 savings over the year. She read it aloud and I could see our relatives running the numbers in their heads. It was beautiful. Perfect mix of shame and realization moved throughout the room as she unboxed all the paraphernalia .

    We still use the machine, but I understand its a PITA to clean. Who knew? Anyway, she stopped buying coffee every day and started doing it herself with grocery store beans instead of Starbucks. I became addicted to the espresso beans through my simple drip machine, and I feel like we're a few shmeckles richer every Christmas.

    And for the record, I don't know how Starbucks fucks it up so bad in the store. That dark espresso roast makes a damn fine cuppa joe in my kitchen.

    The drip coffee at work is fucking terrible. The end.

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
  113. If you want to do it right at home... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need to buy a Versa Dynamics coffee grinder...

    https://www.versalab.com/GRINDER%20DETAILS.html

    Starting at only $2285, additional accessories may or may not be required.
    They also have a coffee press, $445
    Some years ago I read on the inventor's website that the method coffee beans are ground and pressed in the holder to make espresso could be the difference between blah and yea! espresso/coffee. That $2700 pays for machines that produce superior coffee, consistently.
    $2700 buys a lot of Starbucks!

    =====
    O'Leary's objection reduce coffee to a caffeine delivery vehicle. Not new; I consider French Fries a catsup delivery tool, ice cream a chocolate syrup delivery vehicle...etc.
    But coffee, espresso, lattes and all the other coffee based drinks are also something that can be enjoyed for flavor and tastes. Calvinists need not apply.
    If you excuse me, I'm going to get Crio Bru.
    https://criobru.com/

  114. I have never.... by MerlTurkin · · Score: 1

    been in a Starbucks. You have to be retarded to pay that much for coffee. I make my own.

  115. Dunkin Donuts coffee - weak swill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had it 2-3 times. It must be a thing you get used to. It's bad coffee, and most importantly, it is uninteresting coffee.

  116. Re:Running a business has overhead by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    And you wouldn't need glasses.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  117. Paying for time, not coffee by loufoque · · Score: 1

    You're paying for the time of the barrista, not the coffee.
    It's idiotic to compare it to the cost of the materials.

  118. Ristretto by loufoque · · Score: 1

    The best coffee is a ristretto. No milk or random shit in it.
    Coffee shops don't sell that.

    1. Re:Ristretto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the Italians say, "we have a word for watered-down coffee: 'Americano'"

  119. Re:Running a business has overhead by war4peace · · Score: 1

    I don't... achievement unlocked.

    --
    ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
  120. DIY by NewYork · · Score: 1
  121. Troll story... by martinfb · · Score: 1

    This article must have been posted for purely trolling purposes!

    Any semi-intelligent adult knows that ANYTHING done at home is cheaper.
    One's time at home making coffee is usually considered valuable stress-free (meditation) of sorts; just an added benefit.
    It could be argued that home brew coffee is much more to preferences than any other service.

    So, fine! DON'T by a coffee-shop coffee for $2.50! Don't by a deli sandwhich for $8! Don't buy a deli salad for $7!
    Go home for breakfast/lunch/dinner! Then, invest your savings!

    Now get back to work finding important articles worth reviewing!

    --


    Self-importance and self-indulgence is the root of ALL evil.
  122. Lipton FTW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meh, I'll just take Lipton instant, maybe add a few leaves of mint to it if the mood strikes me.