Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: What Are Your Greatest Successes and Weaknesses With Wine (Software)?

wjcofkc writes: As a distraction, I decided to get the video-editing software Filmora up and running on my Ubuntu box. After some tinkering, I was able to get it installed, only to have the first stage vaporize on launch. This got me reflecting on my many hits and misses with Wine (software) over the years. Before ditching private employment, my last job was with a software company. They were pretty open minded when I came marching in with my System76 laptop, and totally cool with me using Linux as my daily driver after quickly getting the Windows version of their software up and running without a hitch. They had me write extensive documentation on the process. It was only two or three paragraphs, but I consider that another Wine win since to that end I scored points at work. Past that, open source filled in the blanks. That was the only time I ever actually needed (arguably) for it to work. Truth be told, I mostly tinker around with it a couple times a year just to see what does and does not run. Wine has been around for quite awhile now, and while it will never be perfect, the project is not without merit. So Slashdot community, what have been your greatest successes and failures with Wine over the years?

252 comments

  1. Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats about it. Seems to work fine. I don't see much of a point with anything else. Office I use LibreOffice and web browsers are all written native.

    Oh, tetris once ages ago.

    1. Re:Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most high performance business apps are native Windows. If you ever want to pull down some serious bling and not just be lumped in with the programmer crew you need native Windows performance. I'm not sure you could ever trade on a different platform

    2. Re: Photoshop by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1, Informative

      WINE literally stands for WINE is NOT an Emulator. You get native Linux performance, so in other words better than on Windows.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    3. Re:Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wine is pretty awesome these days. Almost every good Windows app or game runs fine with it.

    4. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wine Is Not Emulation

    5. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True :-) ... except where graphics drivers are concerned (most games).

    6. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're talking out of your ass. Most Windows games run perfectly under Wine.

    7. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tried No Man's Sky? Requires 64-bit Wine (32-bit Wine is installed by default even on 64-bit systems), OpenGL 4+ and a whole bunch of messing around. Wine doesn't even run old games like Halo [1] properly any more.

    8. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get native Linux performance, so in other words better than on Windows.

      Correction: you can theoretically get close to native Linux performance (there's still an extra layer of abstraction there), so in other words better than on windows in those exceedingly rare instances where the program actually runs properly.

    9. Re: Photoshop by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      I said that when I correctly stated what it stands for ... weren't you paying attention?.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    10. Re: Photoshop by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      There is no layer of abstraction. They implement the Windows API on Linux. When using actual Windows .dlls there may be a few instructions of overhead, but nothing that comes close to being significant.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    11. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The name is bullshit. Just like Lame Ain't an MP3 Encoder..... except LAME very much is an MP3 encoder, and a great one.

    12. Re: Photoshop by megamind · · Score: 1

      I used it to run the gaming backend server for quake 3, call of duty, battlefield, etc.

    13. Re: Photoshop by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      It is not "bullshit". You evidently don't know how emulators work. WINE is indeed NOT and emulator.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    14. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn to read, you illiterate fuck. "WINE is NOT an Emulator" is not the same as "Wine Is Not Emulation".

    15. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, because I play No Man's Sky using Wine all of the time. It works great. Halo PC also works in Wine without issue.

      You got any other lies?

    16. Re: Photoshop by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      WiNE stands for WINE is Not an Emulator" and WINE does not do emulation. I'm not sure which claim you were trying to make, but as usual you are wrong again. Happy Dumbfucksgiving litter stalker friend!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    17. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not "bullshit". You evidently don't know how emulators work. WINE is indeed NOT and emulator.

      It is very subjective and relative.
      You can definitely argue that Wine is an emulator of the Windows runtime API.

      Did you know what the original name "WINE" stood for back in the 90s? "WINdows Emulator".

      The name was changed only later to officially stand for "WIne is Not an Emulator" because of concerns about litigation from Microsoft.
      That is mostly the reason that wine project guys insist so much on the mantra of "windows is not an emulator".

      See the History here:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wine_%28software%29

    18. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More non-sequiturs, eh?

      Once again, learn to read you utterly stupid fuck.

    19. Re: Photoshop by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      It isn't open to argument, though I do concede it is common for people to be confused about this. If one to were define emulation the way you are defining it then every C++ compiler that implements the STL would be an STL emulator. WINE implements the Windows API. It does not emulate it. You can learn more about the difference between emulation and implementation, specifically as it relates to WINE, here.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    20. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, just STFU. You do nothing but pollute our web pages with your ignorant bullshit. You said nothing of value, and everything ZK wrote was correct. We get that you probably wish you could suck his dick and don't know how to tell him, but find another way, would you?

    21. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn to read or GTFO. I'm sick of illiterate, insecure fucks like you around here.

    22. Re: Photoshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no layer of abstraction. They implement the Windows API on Linux.

      Windows API calls -> Native Linux calls

      That's a layer of abstraction.

    23. Re: Photoshop by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      API calls are the layer of abstraction, but we are talking about emulation. There is no extra layer of abstraction as the GP wrongly contends.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  2. Easy by WindBourne · · Score: 1, Funny

    One of my ex-gfs. She was always fun with a bite of wine.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strawberry Hill or Pickle Tink?

    2. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You mean your ex-gf (software)?

    3. Re:Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, thanks for what must be the most boring attempt at faggot humor I'll see all day. The only thing worse than you is the retarded gits who will thumb your inane faggotry right up to 5 without question.

    4. Re: Easy by CustomBuild · · Score: 1

      How did she bite the wine? Did you freeze the shit and serve it in cubes?

    5. Re: Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah.

  3. windows can run under linux so why bother? by iggymanz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    if you're running windows wares you "lost the battle already", just run actual windows in a VM and your windows wares will run wonderfully.

    1. Re:windows can run under linux so why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      maybe to save a windows license? and freedom?? ;-)

    2. Re:windows can run under linux so why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup.

      Wine stopped being worth the headache once hardware got cheap enough to just run a windows VM for the handful of times I need it.

    3. Re:windows can run under linux so why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If all I want to do is play my favorite game from the 90s, then installing windows is a huge waste of time and resources, compared to wine.

    4. Re:windows can run under linux so why bother? by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      you're funny, people waste hours and days trying to twiddle and fiddle and solve wine issues, if they're solvable at all. If you want to play games from the 90s, install an old windows version and have a stable platform for playing with no fuss, the installation only needs to be done once after all.

    5. Re:windows can run under linux so why bother? by iggymanz · · Score: 0

      "freedom" while running proprietary software requiring windows? bwhahaha.

      And how many instructions for running windows wares do you see with "install a copy of xxxx.dll from a working copy of windows"? Answer: Lots.

      So get a license, you windows wares fanboy.

    6. Re:windows can run under linux so why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you're running windows wares you "lost the battle already"

      What if I don't want to battle? What if I just want to run a few games without having to deal with Windows?

      just[sic] run actual windows in a VM and your windows wares will run wonderfully.

      Why would I maintain an entire Windows installation when I can just use Wine? I don't want to update Windows. I don't want to fix it when it inevitably breaks. It's not like you can just download a Damn Small Windows LiveCD iso and use that.

      Your suggestion is the nuclear option. If you absolutely have to run a Windows program and the easier options don't work for you then sure, going through that hassle is available and will probably work. It's excessive for most applications.

    7. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider requirements of Windows license, it is a sensible argument to use something else to protect self from contractual legal obligations of using it. Software comes with different licensing, which is rarely as unfair as Windows EULA.

    8. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by war4peace · · Score: 0

      Feel free to quote those unfair EULA terms.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    9. Re:windows can run under linux so why bother? by tlhIngan · · Score: 5, Informative

      you're funny, people waste hours and days trying to twiddle and fiddle and solve wine issues, if they're solvable at all. If you want to play games from the 90s, install an old windows version and have a stable platform for playing with no fuss, the installation only needs to be done once after all.

      Or support open-source and buy a support license from the commercial version of Wine - Crossover from Codewavers. These guys have made WINE setup and installation pretty damn easy. And they actually support the WINE project too, so it's all on the up and up.

    10. Re:windows can run under linux so why bother? by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      For that matter the Windows Linux Subsystem is pretty slick.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    11. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by tepples · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      These terms in the Windows 10 EULA worry me:

      To the extent included with Windows, Word, Excel, PowerPoint and OneNote are licensed for your personal, non-commercial use, unless you have commercial use rights under a separate agreement.

      this license does not give you any right to, and you may not: [...] work around any technical restrictions or limitations in the software;
      use the software as server software, [...] reverse engineer, decompile, or disassemble the software, or attempt to do so

      Even the most basic telemetry in Windows 10 discloses the identity of every application and driver installed on the system to Microsoft:

      By accepting this agreement and using the software you agree that Microsoft may collect, use, and disclose the information as described in the Microsoft Privacy Statement (aka.ms/privacy), and as may be described in the user interface associated with the software features.

      The following provision appears to make it illegal for the second owner of a used PC with retail Windows to resell that PC and Windows license to a third person:

      If you acquired the software as stand-alone software (and also if you upgraded from software you acquired as stand-alone software), you may transfer the software to another device that belongs to you. You may also transfer the software to a device owned by someone else if (i) you are the first licensed user of the software and (ii) the new user agrees to the terms of this agreement.

      Windows also requires activation:

      You can also activate the software manually by Internet or telephone. In either case, transmission of certain information will occur, and Internet, telephone and SMS service charges may apply.

      I have seen Internet activation fail at my current employer, requiring the administrator to use the telephone activation means, which involves waiting on hold for several minutes. Unless the user subscribes to unmetered telephone service, waiting on hold costs 10 cents per minute (source: T-Mobile.com).

      Windows downloads and installs semiannual updates unattended. It delays download on a metered connection, but there's no GUI to mark an Ethernet network as having a metered uplink (such as that of satellite Internet).

      The softwareperiodically checks for system and app updates, and downloads and installs them for you. You may obtain updates only from Microsoft or authorized sources, and Microsoft may need to update your system to provide you with those updates. By accepting this agreement, you agree to receive these types of automatic updates without any additional notice.

      Class-action arbitration is forbidden:

      you and we agree to binding individual arbitration before the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”) under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), and not to sue in court in front of a judge or jury. Instead, a neutral arbitrator will decide and the arbitrator’s decision will be final except for a limited right of appeal under the FAA. Class action lawsuits, class-wide arbitrations, private attorney-general actions, and any other proceeding where someone acts in a representative capacity aren’t allowed.

      The video portion of the software is for "PERSONAL AND NON-COMMERCIAL USE" only, and I haven't yet taken legal advice as to whether uploading a video to YouTube and allowing ads makes the use no longer "PERSONAL AND NON-COMMERCIAL USE".

      THIS PRODUCT IS LICENSED UNDER THE AVC, THE VC-1, AND THE MPEG-4 PART 2 VISUAL PATENT PORTFOLIO LICENSES FOR THE PERSONAL AND NON-COMMERCIAL USE OF A CONSUMER TO (i) ENCODE VIDEO IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ABOVE STANDARDS (“VIDEO S

    12. Re:windows can run under linux so why bother? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Why would I maintain an entire Windows installation when I can just use Wine?

      Because the application raises an unhandled exception and writes a memory dump when you start it under Wine. And even if you manually write the registry keys whose absence causes the exception, it freezes up in the settings dialog. Or when you're editing an instrument, one of the controls starts flashing, causing the entire application to become unresponsive. All three of these problems are true of the application 0CC-FamiTracker 0.3.14.6 on Wine 1.8, the version of Wine shipped with Debian 9.

    13. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0

      Hey, you asked for it buddy (referring to post from the guy that obliged)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    14. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0

      I hear you buddy! OCD fannismacker is such an important tool that you'd have to be a fool not to give Microsoft all your data and some cash rather than risk a single day without it!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    15. Re:windows can run under linux so why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because 3D games? I've never had any luck with 3D acceleration in a VM.

      Would be nice if they had SR-IOV graphics processors where you could just assign a virtual portion of it to a VM. Too niche market for affordable desktop use though, I suppose.

    16. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      I know right! If only Linux had something cool like that!

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    17. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by war4peace · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Most of those are safety nets. You perceive them as possible dangers, I perceive them differently.
      1. "use the software as server software" refers to you being denied support if you use the Windows 10 OS commercially as a server and your database hosted under it breaks. Basically, if you use Windows 10 non-server as a server and it fucks your data, you can't sue for damages.
      Car analogy: "You can't use your Volkswagen Polo for professional racing".

      2. the software transfer chain issue: I don't think it's "unfair". They're protecting their business - they allow you to transfer the license to a second user, and that's it. It being fair or not is subjective - I'm not saying it should be fair to everyone, but I don't personally see it as unfair either.

      3. A crapton of commercial software requires activation. Most games do too. Is it fair? Not really, ideally. But if you think about it, first there was unprotected software which everyone was copying, then protections started being implemented as an effect. The F/OSS blossomed as an effect of that. And to be fair, Windows still allows you to use it very well without activation. most other commercial software doesn't even install, let alone run, without activation.

      4. Automatic updates: sure they suck. But then again, I am torn on this, not really sure which way to lean, because it's a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" scenario. No updates means unpatched vulnerabilities and then you blame Microsoft. Forced updates means money lost if a metered connection is involved, and rare occasions when the OS breaks. So they picked their poison, and yours too.

      5. "Class-action arbitration is forbidden" - is that even enforceable? I'm from the EU and here it's definitely not enforceable.

      6. The Video part of the license is actually not really theirs. "ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED FROM MPEG LA, L.L.C. SEE (AKA.MS/MPEGLA)". Microsoft licensed that codec and sublicenses it to you. It's the same license spaghetti as the MP3 stuff which Linux distros suffered from for years - you had to download it manually and agree to its license terms separately, otherwise you couldn't even listen to an MP3 song.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    18. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thought maybe on the eve of Thanksgiving I could come here and not find you behaving like a jackass. Nope! Business as usual for you. Do you even realize that even if you have a good point nobody hears you when you behave like such a dick?

    19. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by war4peace · · Score: 0

      And I replied.
      You act as if that were a pissing contest or something. Grow up. I was asking for details, I got details provided, I answered them with my understanding on them.
      Yes, we're having a *gasp* mature discussion on Slashdot.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    20. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0

      Yeah ... "feel free to post what I could google" is how every adult discussion on Slashdot starts. What was I thinking!?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    21. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0

      What's That? I can't hear You! Dick.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    22. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by tepples · · Score: 0

      Basically, if you use Windows 10 non-server as a server and it fucks your data, you can't sue for damages.

      It's worded not only as a liability disclaimer but also as a prohibition on such use in the first place. Not only can you not sue for damages, but if Microsoft discovers that you are running a home server as a hobbyist, it theoretically reserves the right to sue you for infringement of its copyrights in the Windows operating system.

      A crapton of commercial software requires activation. Most games do too.

      At least with games, there's less of a chance of using up your one Internet activation and having to resort to a (relatively expensive) phone call. Nor do single-player and local-multiplayer console games require activation.

      "Class-action arbitration is forbidden" - is that even enforceable?

      It is in Slashdot's home country. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011).

      I'm from the EU and here it's definitely not enforceable.

      Which EU country? And how much room does it have to admit refugees from a commerce regime in Slashdot's home country that recognizes hardly any rights of individual end users?

    23. Re:windows can run under linux so why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      people waste hours and days trying to twiddle and fiddle and solve wine issues,

      But I don't... so again, why should I waste my time installing a full copy of windows when the software I want to run works fine in wine?

      There are also people who spend hours and days trying to fiddle with getting Linux to do what they want. But that doesn't mean everyone does nor does it mean people shouldn't run Linux at all when it works fine without fuss for a lot of people and use cases.

    24. Re:windows can run under linux so why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the application raises an unhandled exception and writes a memory dump when you start it under Wine.

      Funny enough, when I installed GTA4 from steam, it did exactly that in windows. A couple hours of effort changed the unhandled exception to a handled one that produced an uninformative error and closing.

      It worked fine, with zero tweaking in wine though.

      I realize that is much more common for software to have problems in wine than in actual windows, but windows isn't perfect. GTA4 isn't the only example at least, as I've had some esoteric RF and optics software that will run in wine but not windows any more.

    25. Re:windows can run under linux so why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or support open-source and buy a support license from the commercial version of Wine - Crossover from Codewavers.

      While I do support the notion of supporting the developers of WINE, I feel it rather disingenuous to make it sound like Crossover is much of a solution as a lot of times games simply aren't listed. Also, the design of it (producing a bottle per program) can make installs take a lot more time and makes it more difficult to deal with things like sharing stuff. Finally, I know I personally had a lot of issues trying to get the proper information to include the desired content in my app menu (in icewm for me).

      These guys have made WINE setup and installation pretty damn easy. And they actually support the WINE project too, so it's all on the up and up.

      If you want to support WINE, please do. But I'd recommend PlayOnLinux. It's actually as bad or worse than Crossover from the UI but after a lot of fussing around I figured out how to make bottles with scripts just like Crossover which end up being a near necessity with WINE if you want to actually get stuff working and then not worry about breaking it later trying to get something else working. Which leads to the major problem: as bottles are about the only way you're going to get a lot of specific games to work requiring the right version of wine, right "windows version", right dlls, etc, you're SOL if you seriously want to play your Steam games as a rule. Yes, if you do a lot of the fiddling like the GP suggested, you might get to the point of having 30-40% (about where I'm at) of games working (ignoring that probably at least a few work really badly performance wise).

      tl;dr Getting a separate computer just for Windows games. I know I spent a really, really long trying to use WINE and/or VMs to get around this, but they're just not good enough. Still, if it works in WINE, definitely go that route. Just don't bother with all the fussing/botlles/whatever. It's an exercise in frustration.

    26. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got details and then tried to weasel your way around them. No sane person could think that those terms are acceptable.

    27. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Oh, I am sorry, I didn't know I could google for whatever passes as parent poster's opinion on something. I guess those damned corporation already extracted his thoughts and put them up publicly on display, must be my poor googling skills. Teach me, master, for I wish to learn... what is my opinion of you? Google it and tell me how you did it.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    28. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Which EU country?

      It doesn't matter, AFAIK it covers the whole of EU.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    29. Re:windows can run under linux so why bother? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      tl;dr Getting a separate computer just for Windows games.

      I put a 16GB M.2 SSD into my motherboard (my primary SSD is normal SATA with Windows 7) and installed Linux on it. VMware player is installed on both operating systems, and I can boot each one from the other so I can load Linux to do stuff while I'm playing games, or I can load Windows to do stuff while I'm doing work. If one is going to have a single computer, this solution works great and Windows never steps on GRUB. A surprising number of games play acceptably in Windows on VMware hosted on Linux with their D3D to OGL driver.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    30. Re:windows can run under linux so why bother? by BadDreamer · · Score: 1

      And my laptop will burn through battery at brutal rates, all to be able to run a simple piece of software required to get my work done.

      Thanks but no thanks. I'll keep running it in Wine, where it hardly eats any CPU and uses very little RAM, and for that matter runs faster than it does in Windows.

    31. Re:windows can run under linux so why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just run actual windows in a VM and your windows wares will run wonderfully.

      ... as long as you don't need DirectX 10+ or OpenGL 3+ compatibility. Even VMware Workstation doesn't support the latest versions of DirectX and OpenGL.

    32. Re:windows can run under linux so why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I put a 16GB M.2 SSD into my motherboard (my primary SSD is normal SATA with Windows 7) and installed Linux on it.

      I can't really imagine having a mere 16GB for Linux. I've got a 480GB SSD in my Linux machine (and 7TB of HDDs) and a 500GB SSD in my Windows machine (and a 1TB HDD an a 5TB USB HDD). I've quickly filled up both SSDs on both systems with games from Steam. Add to that VM images and all the actual Linux OS stuff...

      VMware player is installed on both operating systems, and I can boot each one from the other so I can load Linux to do stuff while I'm playing games, or I can load Windows to do stuff while I'm doing work.

      This I'm surprised with since Windows seems to complain when you massively switch hardware (to the point of triggering activation). How did you get around this?

      If one is going to have a single computer, this solution works great and Windows never steps on GRUB.

      How do you actually ensure that? There's plenty of stories of Windows "helpfully" reformatting HDDs (possibly with a quick prompt but if that springs up every boot that's trivially to accidental hit enter on once) as well as the issue that every Windows 10 update is near a new install and there's stories of grub being overwritten. Do you use Windows 7? Are you just lucky?

      A surprising number of games play acceptably in Windows on VMware hosted on Linux with their D3D to OGL driver.

      I tried using VMWare Player. I wouldn't really call the game playing performance "acceptable". Another major issue I had with VMWare is that each time I updated my kernel it'd break the drivers because apparently it's not properly hooked up to DKMS? Same thing with every VMWare Player update: I had to uninstall and then reinstall VMWare Player because a simple upgrade wouldn't work. Other than those two things, I will admit VMWare was plenty impressive. It's still no match for an actual dedicated machine, though.

      Trust me. I tried really card to go with a single computer solution. It invariably means you have to constantly compromise. The whole fact that you would ever need to stop and reboot to the other OS just undermines the whole thing.

    33. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      You didn't ask him to provide him opinions. You asked him to post the actual EULA. Off you go now ...

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    34. Re:windows can run under linux so why bother? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Really? I use wine on macOS and generally it's a matter of clicking the create wrapper button in the Wineskin app, and then dragging the installer onto the install button, and then I have a Mac .app that wraps the game. I don't have to do it much anymore, because GOG now does it for me for a lot of games.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    35. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is it off topic in an open discussion about Wine to discuss the contractual obligations that use of Wine avoids?

    36. Re:windows can run under linux so why bother? by tsa · · Score: 1

      wine is more flexible too. Easier to use.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    37. Re:windows can run under linux so why bother? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I can't really imagine having a mere 16GB for Linux.

      It's plenty to run vmware and a web browser. I can't hibernate (I have 16GB RAM, too) but I don't need to, because boot time is sufficiently speedy (even with debian without-systemd.)

      This I'm surprised with since Windows seems to complain when you massively switch hardware (to the point of triggering activation). How did you get around this?

      I just booted it, and it worked. It's Windows 7, mind you.

      I tried using VMWare Player. I wouldn't really call the game playing performance "acceptable".

      It's on a per-title basis. Some games are great, some games are okay, some games are unplayable, and some games just crash.

      Another major issue I had with VMWare is that each time I updated my kernel it'd break the drivers because apparently it's not properly hooked up to DKMS?

      That may be, but it's easy enough to re-run the installer when you upgrade the kernel. There's probably a trivial way to make it happen automatically.

      Trust me. I tried really card to go with a single computer solution. It invariably means you have to constantly compromise.

      I actually have a separate Linux machine, for those times when I need two machines, but I also added this into my main PC for those times when I just really wish my Windows PC were running Linux instead. It was cheap AF and my MB had a M.2 slot.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    38. Re:windows can run under linux so why bother? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Sorry I didn't realise the choice of OS was a battle.

    39. Re:windows can run under linux so why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you're clueless. I guess you have never heard of PlayOnLinux.

    40. Re:windows can run under linux so why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That may be, but it's easy enough to re-run the installer when you upgrade the kernel. There's probably a trivial way to make it happen automatically.

      Uh, yea. Clearly the issue is that it won't do it itself and just gets stuck in an error state. This really should be resolved by VMWare Player being in my distro's repository, but *shrug*. I doubt that'll happen.

      I actually have a separate Linux machine, for those times when I need two machines, but I also added this into my main PC for those times when I just really wish my Windows PC were running Linux instead.

      That's actually the sort of thing that's made me want to install Xen on the Windows PC and try GPU pass-through. Unfortunately, that's still at a state where I don't trust it'd be worth the effort. I've also thought about KVM on Linux and GPU pass-through. The only way either of those would work to my satisfaction, though, would be a way to boot Windows on computer start with Linux. However, since it sounds like you're not really wanting a CoLinux/CoWindows system, that's all pretty moot. At that level, I'd probably settle for mingw and just use my Linux system when I really wanted one./p.

    41. Re:windows can run under linux so why bother? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      However, since it sounds like you're not really wanting a CoLinux/CoWindows system, that's all pretty moot. At that level, I'd probably settle for mingw and just use my Linux system when I really wanted one.

      I recently installed mingw. I'm a long time Cygwin user, and still use it for sshd. I got out of using mingw by scoring a binary for my particular case after loads of forum digging, but it's still installed. I have used colinux, and I think it's neato when it fits the use case, and I might try doing something with colinux and salt soon just for the laughs.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    42. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by war4peace · · Score: 1

      No, I asked him to provide the parts of which he thinks are unfair.
      The fact that X is unfair or not is subjective - there is no such thing that is objectively unfair.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    43. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Really? So if I kill you just because I'm bored it is entirely possible that I am being fair to you when I do it? Or maybe you want to rethink yet another of your ridiculous claims.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    44. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Might not be fair to me, but might be fair to you.
      Don't you have anything better to do than concocting these fractured logic ideas?

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    45. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      I proved you wrong and now you want to redirect the attention away from that ... don't you have anything better to do than keep posting ridiculous and easily disproved claims on Slashdot?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    46. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by war4peace · · Score: 1

      Yes: You're a fucking idiot.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    47. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      ROTFLMAO ... more claims that are ridiculously easy to disprove. You are so precious.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    48. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Since you made me your "foe" I went ahead and made you my "friend" so that every time you see a post from me you'll see that little green and red pill and remember to take your meds :-)

      Off you go now little fuckwad ...

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    49. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need to be so combative zero_kelvin. The others in this thread weren't.

    50. Re: windows can run under linux so why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes a special kind of stupid to make that claim.

  4. Hangovers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... are a physical limitation. Wine with Linux sets you free.

    1. Re:Hangovers... by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      Along with some salted hash browns.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    2. Re:Hangovers... by nnet · · Score: 1

      with gravy.

  5. Broke and Working - here's my top 5 by Seven+Spirals · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Works GREAT: MS Office 2003, Total Commander, WinRAR, Photoshop 6, RegEx Buddy

    Broken Badly and I wish they weren't: Skype, Fractal Painter, Newer Photoshop CS, just about all WWW browsers, and newer Outlook

    Most of the time, one is simply backed into a corner when turning to Wine. I hate using it, but it's better than booting into Windows.

    1. Re: Broke and Working - here's my top 5 by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      You do know web browsers run natively and using WINE makes no sense right?

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    2. Re:Broke and Working - here's my top 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On Mac it's a little bit slow and clumsy. I used it to install FAR file man, and it would show file system all the way to the root with some inconsistencies. And I agree - it is better than stupid Windows.

    3. Re:Broke and Working - here's my top 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the time, one is simply backed into a corner when turning to Wine. I hate using it, but it's better than booting into Windows.

      Pretty much this. I had a paid for crossover license too. I went back to running Windows in a VM. Wine worked but I just decided it's annoying enough to operate that I may as well boot up a VM or RDP to one running on a server. I already have the compute resources and the virtualization in place for other reasons. I'm morally supportive of their efforts but I took the easy way out. I hope my license money helped in some way.

    4. Re: Broke and Working - here's my top 5 by fgouget · · Score: 1

      You do know web browsers run natively and using WINE makes no sense right?

      Right. If your life is limited to Slashdot and Facebook then yes, using Wine makes no sense. But for people who have a real job or hobby that depends on a Windows application, when Wine works it is much more practical than having to reboot or install a virtual machine.

    5. Re: Broke and Working - here's my top 5 by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0

      Go back and read the thread again. Maybe you will see why your post was idiotic.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    6. Re: Broke and Working - here's my top 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the embedded browser fails for various job related programs because the programmers took shortcuts instead of writing their own GUI from complete scratch, then it is not idiotic to complain about browser support in wine.

    7. Re: Broke and Working - here's my top 5 by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      IE and Edge don't run naively. They don't work decently under Wine either though.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    8. Re:Broke and Working - here's my top 5 by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Broken Badly and I wish they weren't: Skype,

      Microsoft have a Skype client for Linux.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    9. Re: Broke and Working - here's my top 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work at a place that writes various web apps (Java, PrimeFaces) used by various large government institutions or government institution-like companies. The applications work with huge sums of money, so security is important to these institutions. For some or other bizarre reason, IE (11) is still specified as the platform minimum, other browsers being optional. I guess these institutions
      (1) follow the adage of you can't go wrong with the big names (Microsoft, Oracle, IBM) (HAHA)
      (2) cost is not an issue
      (3) want to control what goes on to client machines at their site. (Hmmmm....)
      (4) someone did mention compatibility issues with PrimeFaces and different browsers, but I haven't seen anything yet.
      (5) I guess plain old inertia also plays a role.

      Recently our IT support dept started a drive to voluntarily get us converted to Linux workstations (simple old Mint). Their main reasons:
      (a) Cost
      (b) Speed

      The problems with getting IE to run on this is basically the main stumbling block holding us back. It seems the best solution is a virtual box with Win on it - which negates at least the cost benefit.

      I'd be happy to switch, have been using a similar Linux setup before starting this gig without trouble and loved it, but sometimes it's just too much trouble to push back against the bureaucracies and old entrenched ways of thinking and senior peoples' say so - there are more important entrenched issues to be pushed against (another shop that uses Agile in the "not right" way) so one prioritizes battles to fight.

    10. Re:Broke and Working - here's my top 5 by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I found SmartGit works well, but Visual Studio and apps that use its shell like Atmel Studio tend to fail under WINE.

      Kind of surprised that Linux doesn't have really a great, free graphical Git client and a similarly excellent IDE. Stuff like Eclipse is okay, but especially when it comes to sell well supported platforms like embedded it tends to fall far short. You can sort of bodge it all together with scripts and external apps, but why make an already tricky job even harder?

      Oh, and QQ International works great under WINE. I was quite surprised, it uses fully skinned windows but they look and work just fine.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Broke and Working - here's my top 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft have a Skype client for Linux.

      Yes and it sucks balls, too. e.g.: None of the useful plugins (like whiteboarding) work in it.

    12. Re: Broke and Working - here's my top 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you absolutely must run IE or Edge then you have bigger problems than Windows vs Wine. For one, your job sucks.

    13. Re:Broke and Working - here's my top 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think people should be forced to read the terms of service for skype OUT LOUD. I doubt many people would use it after that.

    14. Re: Broke and Working - here's my top 5 by fgouget · · Score: 1

      The only thing idiotic is claiming "You do know web browsers run natively and using WINE makes no sense right?". Although if you only meant that using Wine for running web browsers makes no sense then you would have more of a point, except for all the compatibility issues with various Intranet (synonym for badly designed) websites.

    15. Re: Broke and Working - here's my top 5 by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      They are IE and Edge. In other words they don't work decently on any platform :-)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    16. Re: Broke and Working - here's my top 5 by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Sounds like an edge case. Except it's an IE 11 rather than Edge edge case if you will :-)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    17. Re: Broke and Working - here's my top 5 by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      You would have to be, and are, an idiot for not understanding that I was saying using WINE to run a web browser makes no sense (there is literally no other valid way to interpret the sentence, in or out of context.) It is 2017, so the argument that the solution to bad intranet designs might be to use WINE is similarly idiotic.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    18. Re: Broke and Working - here's my top 5 by fgouget · · Score: 1

      The only idiotic thing I'm doing is responding to an obvious troll.

    19. Re:Broke and Working - here's my top 5 by iTrawl · · Score: 1

      As far as Skype is concerned, run the native Preview. It's pretty good.

      --
      "Everybody's naked underneath" -- The Doctor
    20. Re: Broke and Working - here's my top 5 by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Yeah buddy. You got involved in a discussion that was none of your business, completely misinterpreted what the conversation was about, got snide and tried to suggest you have a "real job" (unlike us of course), won't admit you made all these mistakes and continue to try to make it look like I'm at fault here, and I'm the troll. ROTFLMAO.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    21. Re:Broke and Working - here's my top 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using SmartGit and SmartSVN on Ubuntu for years, both work fine. I'm using foundation/free versions though.

  6. alpha stage game by GarretSidzaka · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I got a recent strategy pc game to run fine (albeit slowly). Heres the catch: i was an early alpha tester and the game didnt even have textures yet. The game developer was shocked when i told him it worked

    1. Re:alpha stage game by war4peace · · Score: 5, Funny

      The game developer was shocked because the game had been released 6 months ago and had all features implemented... but under Wine it looked like an early alpha with no textures.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    2. Re: alpha stage game by silverdirk · · Score: 2

      I was actually running Starcraft II just a few months ago and it worked great. But, with Blizzardâ(TM)s regular patches they finally managed to break it for me. Now it works right up until I start a match and then crashes.

      --
      Mark of the Coder fades from you. You perform Opening on World of Warcraft. Warcraft crits GPA for 4. GPA dies.
    3. Re: alpha stage game by Voice+of+satan · · Score: 1

      I got it to run and update properly with WINE staging on xubuntu 16.04 using this walktrough:

      https://askubuntu.com/question...

      The second advice, the one who says you have to uninstall PlayOnLinux. All i had to do is rename the file i downloaded with some name in .exe. It was two weeks ago.

      But i agree it is a hassle. I successfully ran sidplay95 on it too.

      IL2 sturmovik flat out refused to install. Falcon 4 BMS worked but without recognising properly my HOTAS so there was no point. I have not booted windows for more than a year.

  7. Minesweeper by pele · · Score: 1

    Minesweeper was the only thing I ever got to run with it. And notepad, maybe. Wine sucked eggs since its inception. Bet it still does?!

  8. Games work well by phorm · · Score: 1

    As of a year or two ago, most of my (at least older) Windows games started working quite well.

    I've setup a PXE server for which clients can run quite a few games, including various games running under wine .Easy ol'-fashioned LAN party!

  9. Are those the only options Succeed OR Fail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What manner of Skinner box did this OP crawl out of to propose such irrational selfishness! To WINE or not to WINE that is the question they proposed. If WINE exists then that alone is success. Come try to destroy it and you shall fail.

    1. Re:Are those the only options Succeed OR Fail? by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      "To WINE or not to WINE that is the question they proposed."

      Yes, that is what the OP proposed as a topic of conversation.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  10. "Success" by ilsaloving · · Score: 3, Informative

    My greatest success was giving up and just using a full windows VM under Parallels.

    Fiddling with wine is fine when you're living alone with nothing better to do. But when you have stuff you need to get done, the last thing you have time for is fiddling around with esoteric settings and figuring out why your particular version of a DLL won't work just so you can get your chosen app running.

    1. Re:"Success" by tepples · · Score: 1

      I guess it's a matter of whether your employer is willing to expense $200 for Windows and $80 for Parallels Desktop.

    2. Re:"Success" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit, $280???!!!

    3. Re:"Success" by Deep+Esophagus · · Score: 0

      All I ever cared about was getting favorite games of the 90s to run on my Linux desktop without booting to a Windows partition:

      • Age of Kings
      • Theme Park
      • Theme Hospital ("Pharmacist needed in the pharmacy!")
      • Call of Duty 2

      Wine didn't run a single one of those properly. I gave up and installed a secondary boot partition for Windows 98 until VMWare came out with a free client, and ever since then it's been VMPlayer all the way.

      I really wanted WINE to succeed, but it's just too little too late at this point.

    4. Re:"Success" by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I guess it's a matter of whether your employer is willing to expense $200 for Windows and $80 for Parallels Desktop.

      If the alternative is to spend even one or two days total dicking around with Wine, it's money well-spent. Of course, I would ideally find an alternative to running Windows software, but we all know that's not always feasible.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:"Success" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My greatest success was giving up and just using a full windows VM under Parallels.

      How's that OpenGL 4 support working out for you? Oh, you mean Parallels still only supports OpenGL 3.2 Core Profile? Sucks to be a paying customer.

    6. Re:"Success" by tepples · · Score: 1

      I guess the extent to which $280 is worth it depends on the exchange rate between your country's currency and the United States dollar.

    7. Re:"Success" by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      Considering that I don't use a single blessed thing in my VM that requires OpenGL, I'd say it's working just fine, TYVM. :)

      I have a separate windows laptop that I use for games. For any real work, I use a Mac cause I need a machine that I can rely on that won't spontaneously reboot or force a major configuration change on me without my permission.

  11. No USB, so no can do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The only thing I would need Wine for is for configuring and updating various USB devices that can only speak to Windows. Other than that, I can do just about everything else I need to do without Windows.

    No USB on Wine means it's useless to me. Yeah its really great that they spend so much time tweaking the FPS on games. If maybe 1 /10 that effort was devoted to USB it would bring Wine to a whole new level.

    Face it Wine has reached "end of life" development-wise. They've hit a dead end and the only sign of any life is getting some obscure game running at bronze level. Big whoop.

  12. Extensive documentation? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    "They had me write extensive documentation on the process. It was only two or three paragraphs, ..."

    Perhaps something is missing here - but, in most contexts, "two or three paragraphs" is nowhere near "extensive" documentation. That's more along the lines of "better than nothing".

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Extensive documentation? by dfsmith · · Score: 1

      Extensive does not mean "lots". It means far-reaching---you can write something extensive in one sentence. e.g., "A communications disruption could mean only one thing: invasion." (See also, fake news, Last Jedi.)

    2. Re:Extensive documentation? by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 0

      That sentence does not qualify as documentation. It’s not even accurate, except as a fantasy movie line.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Extensive documentation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps he's Lennart Poettering.

  13. WoW by Creedo · · Score: 2

    I played World of Warcraft from vanilla to MoP under the default Wine that was rolled out with Debian. Never had a problem. Well, aside from the problems caused by too much time sunk into WoW....

    --
    All that is necessary for the triumph of good is that evil men do nothing.
    1. Re:WoW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ran WOW and Skyrim (until the new extended edition compiled against latest windows).

    2. Re:WoW by Myrdos · · Score: 1

      Me too, but the graphics looked bad when compared to running on Windows, and I got significantly more CPU usage. That was with NVidia's proprietary drivers. Also on Debian, during Burning Crusade. It was then that I decided Wine wasn't worth using for games - even the highest-rated titles suffered from performance and graphics problems. I just kept a Windows partition around for games, and used Linux for work.

      Fast forward to the present, when there are enough native Linux games on Steam to keep me happy. I keep an old laptop with Windows around in case I ever want to run Windows software, but it's just collecting dust.

    3. Re:WoW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too, but the graphics looked bad when compared to running on Windows, and I got significantly more CPU usage

      I had the opposite experience, with an ancient computer built in early 2004 with an ATI card. It was older than WoW and by MoP I was getting a slide show and frequent crashes in Windows. In wine it wasn't perfect, but was playable until I finally upgraded. Linux and wine definitely helped with squeezing a few more years out of the computer until I finished grad school and got a real job.

  14. Bennett Haselton? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wtf is with all these stories lately that look like they were written by Bennett Haselton?

    1. Re:Bennett Haselton? by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      He is my life coach. I light a candle before a portrait of his three times a day. He painted it himself.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    2. Re: Bennett Haselton? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they lost Jon Katz's email address!

  15. iTunes by BeerCat · · Score: 2

    iTunes 7 (which was about the newest version that would work with my netbook) worked fine, as it was the only way to play my FairPlay DRM'd stuff.

    as another poster said, everything else was native alternatives (LibreOffice, GIMP) or native browser

    --
    "She's furniture with a pulse"
  16. 16-bit programs? by whoever57 · · Score: 2

    I have a 16-bit program (originally run under Windows 3.0) which I believe the only way to run now is under Wine.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:16-bit programs? by slashcross · · Score: 1

      I have a 16-bit program (originally run under Windows 3.0) which I believe the only way to run now is under Wine.

      You can probably also run the program on 32 bit Windows 7 or possibly newer. I'm not sure how easy it is to get 32 bit versions now, though.

      --
      Slashdot your i and slashcross your t.
    2. Re:16-bit programs? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I have a 16-bit program (originally run under Windows 3.0) which I believe the only way to run now is under Wine.

      You can probably also run the program on 32 bit Windows 7 or possibly newer. I'm not sure how easy it is to get 32 bit versions now, though.

      All consumer versions of Windows still have a 32 bit flavor. So Windows 10 32-bit can run 16-bit apps. Windows 8 and above don't have the ntvdm subsystem installed by default, but running your 16-bit app the first time will auto-install it.

      The other option is use a VM - all VMs nowadays have a 16-bit emulator because practically every OS runs real mode code in the beginning and thus needs emulation to run on a 64-bit environment. Only when you transition to a 32-bit mode will the VM move from emulator to actual hardware.

    3. Re:16-bit programs? by tepples · · Score: 1

      The other option is use a VM

      But then according to the EULA, you technically have to buy two Windows licenses: one for the host and one for the guest. This can get expensive at $199.99 each (source).

    4. Re:16-bit programs? by taustin · · Score: 1

      I don't think that's true. But it's easy enough to install an XP VM in Win 7, and that will run Win 3.0 stuff.

    5. Re:16-bit programs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a 16-bit program (originally run under Windows 3.0) which I believe the only way to run now is under Wine.

      You want DOSBox. You can actually run Windows 3.1 on it. (I helped one helped someone configure it on a 64-bit Win 7 system to run a Win 3.1 app. He needed printing ability, so I installed a postscript driver that directed output to a file--DOSBox can read/write to the directory under which is installed--then used Ghostscript to convert the file to PDF and open Adobe Reader.)

    6. Re:16-bit programs? by Ace17 · · Score: 1

      Can Wine actually run 16-bit programs?

    7. Re:16-bit programs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also hire an assistant, buy him a workstation and necessary licenses and tell them to run the 16-bit program for you. I mean if you want to burn money then don't settle for halfassed solutions. Shovel shit load of money into it because that's what MS wants you to do.

    8. Re:16-bit programs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing I've needed Wine for is a 16-bit, Windows 3.11 game. It has never been 100% functional, and occasionally Wine introduces new bugs that affect it.

      So yay. After over 20 years, Wine still does not fully implement Windows 3.11.

  17. a while by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Two words.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  18. Foobar2000 by xeoron · · Score: 0

    On Linux or MacOSX is my most common use of WINE.

  19. Lotus Notes back in 1999 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really easy to get going (as long as you were careful where you put the mouse as the tool tips caused a crash :-)
    And Photoshop 6 as per one of the previous comments. Gimp is good, but occasionally you need CMYK support.

  20. I used it to play a lot of Diablo II in college by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or, for another way of putting it, "I used it to fail a semester of college"

  21. Successes? by Vlijmen+Fileer · · Score: 1

    Successes?
    I have never accomplished to get anything working with Wine. Not even with hours upon hours of manual, help pages, forum, etc. reading.
    What a horrible piece of forever-incomplete, always unstable, butt-ugly malware it is.

    1. Re:Successes? by green1 · · Score: 1

      That's because wine only supports applications that already have dozens of better native Linux alternatives. If you want to run something that only runs under Windows and has no Linux equivalent it is almost guaranteed not to work. E.g. they only reason I've ever wanted it was to run proprietary software designed to update proprietary hardware over USB. But wine mysteriously thinks that it's 1995 still and doesn't bother with USB support.

    2. Re:Successes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would agree, wine by itself is practically unusable. However, with playonlinux it is actually quite useful. I've managed to use it for a number of programs

      1. Office 2010 including Outlook connected to Exchange server. It had limitations (no encrypted email, required a restart if network changed) but it was worth it compared to alternative email clients on Linux.
      2. Enterprise Architect. They actually include instructions for running under wine.
      3. Various older games: red alert 3, never winter nights, star wars jedi knight, etc
      4. Office 2013. Word and excel mainly. Power point and Outlook are barely usable. Use my office 2013 script from https://github.com/maroc81/playonlinux and be sure to install the reg file there too. There is a 2013 installer included in playonlinux but it doesn't work unless they updated it recently.
      5. Forscan
      6. Sketchup 2016

      There are a number of others I don't remember. Bottom line, wine does work but you need a tool like PlayOnLinux to reel it in.

    3. Re:Successes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is pretty much my experience. The wine devs use some strange definition of the word "stable" with which I was not previously familiar. My favourite was the time a new "stable" release came out with a freshly-rewritten and much-improved(TM) audio subsystem. Suddenly after "upgrading" things that had been working no longer had audio. At the moment I have wine locked to a particular version so that this insanity doesn't happen again.

    4. Re:Successes? by Cutterman · · Score: 1

      Amen. Never got WINE to run anything much reliably despite hours wasted farting about with it. Got bored and bought Parallels to run XP on the Mac (which it does very well) - since I don't use Win7 anymore I might try that. But I'm too old to have the time to spend frigging around with perpetually-alpha software.

      I'm not a gamer (apart from the Myst/Riven etc., universe), so apart from Paint Shop Pro, I don't have much reason to.

      Linux now has good equivalents for almost anything I use on Windows and if I need it Windows runs pretty well in a VM.

      I have a variety of boxen running all sorts of OSes - maybe I should chuck 'em all and just run everything in VMs on a bare-metal hypervisor on one box.

      Mac

  22. SketchUp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only reason I still have a windows machine around (running Win7) is to be able to run SketchUp. The MacOS version sucks and the pared-down web one is abysmal.

    Has anyone been successful running it under Wine?

    1. Re:SketchUp? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. I wrote a custom install script for installing sketchup using playonlinux.

      1. Install play on linux
      2. clone https://github.com/maroc81/playonlinux or just grab the sketchup2016.pol
      3. From play on linux, Tools -> Run a local script
      4. Choose the sketchup2016.pol and follow prompts
      5. Choose download when asked (unless you already have the sketchup installer downloaded)
      6. Follow prompts to download and install all the pieces

      That should get you up and running. Sketchup will work but it's not 100% functional (mainly anything that uses web such as help and interface to install extensions/plugins/whatever sketchup calls them).

      If you haven't used playonlinux, in my opinion, wine is practically unusable without it or similar tools such as crossover.

  23. Unusual Wine Story with IE6. by Zombie+Ryushu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I could list a bunch of other stories, of games and fun stuff, but Ages ago, just before I graduated with a Bachelors Degree, in the far off year of 2008, I had to take this Statistics Course that was unrelated to my Major. It was like one of those Dangling Gen-Ed courses. It was done completely online and it absolutely required Internet Explorer 6.x

    You could NOT do the tests on anything else. So I had a Dell Ubuntu Laptop that Ran I think it was Hardy Heron, that had a Wine Isolated Prefix that ran IE6 just for this site. This course was a miserable slog of difficulty, and it required alot of studying and concentration, and then, came the day, of the online Final Exam which had to be Proctored by a Certified Disabilities Coordinator for my case.

    I get in the Computer lab, they all run XP... and they all run Internet Explorer 7. Not one system will load the site to take the exam. I brought my laptop with me, and the Disabilies Coordinator contacted the Professor and gave the OK for me to bot up my Linux Laptop, plug it into the Ethernet Jack, and take the exam... I made a B. But had I not had my Wine capable laptop running Linux and IE6, I'd have failed that exam, and likely the class.

    The next semester, the entire IE6 application that was made on was redone in Flash and suddenly worked in FireFox with the Linux Flash NPAPI module.

  24. WINE has always lived in the Bizarro Universe. by tlambert · · Score: 2

    WINE has always lived in the Bizarro Universe.

    This is because they always counted the number of API calls they succeed in handling, and then the one they failed at was "just that one".

    So you always had "((N-1)/N * 100)% of calls worked!".

    To get you over that hump, you've always had to to go with a commercial version of WINE, like CrossOver, where they don't ever shove the final fixes back into the actual WINE code -- despite the GPL.

    If the WINE guys are diligent, and go over the published GPL'ed code, and bring the changes back, that's fine, but... there's always this huge latency.

    So from day one, they lied with statistics, and when something started running, then hey, that was great, but not everything was going to run.

    Today, it's more disappointing, since unless you run older Windows programs, from older versions of Windows, things are back to broken.

    1. Re:WINE has always lived in the Bizarro Universe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unless you run older Windows programs, from older versions of Windows

      Well that is pretty much usually the case because most modern software nowadays has an OSX version.

    2. Re:WINE has always lived in the Bizarro Universe. by tepples · · Score: 1

      most modern software nowadays has an OSX version.

      Unless it's from a small business that hasn't yet received enough revenue from license sales to buy enough Macs for testing. You would end up seeing something like this:

      Windows: Buy Now
      Linux: Buy Now
      macOS: Sign Up to know when it becomes available

    3. Re:WINE has always lived in the Bizarro Universe. by fgouget · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is because they always counted the number of API calls they succeed in handling, and then the one they failed at was "just that one".

      So you always had "((N-1)/N * 100)% of calls worked!".

      I have never seen that claim made by any Wine developer. Source please.

      To get you over that hump, you've always had to to go with a commercial version of WINE, like CrossOver, where they don't ever shove the final fixes back into the actual WINE code -- despite the GPL.

      That's a lie:

      $ git log origin/master | grep Author: | head -n 10
      Author: Nikolay Sivov <nsivov at codeweavers.com>
      Author: Jacek Caban <jacek at codeweavers.com>
      Author: Jacek Caban <jacek at codeweavers.com>
      Author: Jacek Caban <jacek at codeweavers.com>
      Author: Jactry Zeng <jzeng at codeweavers.com>
      Author: Huw Davies <huw at codeweavers.com>
      Author: Fabian Maurer <dark.shadow4 at web.de>
      Author: Vincent Povirk <vincent at codeweavers.com>
      Author: Aric Stewart <aric at codeweavers.com>
      Author: Nikolay Sivov <nsivov at codeweavers.com>

      10 commits, 9 by CodeWeavers developpers. So much for CodeWeavers never sending back patches!

      CodeWeavers commits fixes and improvements to Wine first. The benefit of using CrossOver is that it is more up-to-date than Wine Stable, but still goes through a phase of testing and stabilization before it gets into the users hands so it is less buggy than the Wine nightlies.

      Also Wine is LGPL, not GPL. Not that it makes any difference in this case.

    4. Re:WINE has always lived in the Bizarro Universe. by AntiSol · · Score: 1

      I see you have the git repo there. Are you a codeweavers person or a wine person? I'd love some help getting UnrealEd 3 working properly. It's the only thing I miss from my windows days. The response on the wine bugtracker wasn't at all helpful, even though I gave all the requested info and Running With Scissors offered free copies of Postal 2 to anybody willing to help. One guy took a free copy and we never heard another word from him. This show-stopping bug has been open for over 3 years and is still marked "unconfirmed" despite being confirmed by multiple people. Before that there was another show-stopping bug dating back to about 2008 (which did eventually get fixed). The day I can run UnrealEd again will be a day of celebration.

    5. Re:WINE has always lived in the Bizarro Universe. by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      most modern software nowadays has an OSX version.

      Unless it's from a small business that hasn't yet received enough revenue from license sales to buy enough Macs for testing. You would end up seeing something like this:

      Windows: Buy Now

      Linux: Buy Now

      macOS: Sign Up to know when it becomes available

      if it's from a small business that hasn't received enough revenue from license sales to buy enough Macs for testing you are more likely to see:

      Windows: Buy Now

      macOS: Sign Up to know when it becomes available

      Linux: Never

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    6. Re:WINE has always lived in the Bizarro Universe. by tlambert · · Score: 1

      This is because they always counted the number of API calls they succeed in handling, and then the one they failed at was "just that one".

      So you always had "((N-1)/N * 100)% of calls worked!".

      I have never seen that claim made by any Wine developer. Source please.

      It's been that way since the early 1990's.

      You's run something, it'd run until it fell over because Wine was not sufficiently implemented, and then it'd print fudged stats to encourage you to contribute code.

      It's always been that way; did they take the stats out? Because they sure as heck were in there in 1993-1995 when I and some other FreeBSD folks were sending patches.

    7. Re:WINE has always lived in the Bizarro Universe. by fgouget · · Score: 1

      It's been that way since the early 1990's. You's run something, it'd run until it fell over because Wine was not sufficiently implemented, and then it'd print fudged stats to encourage you to contribute code.

      I have been using and contributing to Wine since 1998 and I have never seen this message you talk about. So again, source please.

    8. Re:WINE has always lived in the Bizarro Universe. by tlambert · · Score: 1

      I do not have Internet Archives from 1994/1995.

      Apparently no one does.

      But neither do I have them from 1963, so JFK is still alive, right, because there's no documentation from the Internet of the time?

    9. Re:WINE has always lived in the Bizarro Universe. by fgouget · · Score: 1

      I do not have Internet Archives from 1994/1995.

      Apparently no one does.

      Ok, so you got a weird message that one time over two decades ago. That's possible. But it is at odds with you claiming this is still going on by repeating 'always' four times in your original post. So as far as I can tell the only one lying is you: no, Wine has not been giving this meaningless statistic for the past two decades; and, contrary to your claim, CodeWeavers does feed back its changes to Wine on a daily basis.

  25. None by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I boot up my Windows 10 desktop or surface and things just work.

    Once in a blue moon I will install a Linsux VM for fun in Hyper-V, laugh, and quickly delete it.

  26. Lego games... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sw complete saga, indiana jones 2. Office 2010, ie7, quakelive.

  27. Greatest Success? by Quarters · · Score: 1

    Learning to not care about the OS and going with the one that gives me the largest ecosystem of quality software.

    1. Re:Greatest Success? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      I agree, I've been running Linux exclusively since the mid-to-late 90s for home use and I've never needed Wine for anything.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  28. Stock-trading platforms by ClickOnThis · · Score: 2

    Success: Questrade IQ Edge (Canadian broker)

    Weakness: Fidelity Active Trader Pro (US broker)

    Details:

    Questrade IQ Edge works quite well under Wine, although it freezes if I try to minimize its window.

    Fidelity Active Trader Pro almost finishes starting up, but fails at the last moment with an unhelpful error message. Funny thing is, Fidelity uses Crossover (a Wine derivative) to run Active Trader Pro on Macs. I'm wondering whether it's worth buying the Linux version of Crossover.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    1. Re:Stock-trading platforms by fgouget · · Score: 1

      Note that CrossOver has a free trial version. So the simplest way to figure out whether it's worth it would be to try it out.

    2. Re:Stock-trading platforms by green1 · · Score: 1

      And the only reason you had any need for IQ edge was because their online platform ran Silverlight for who knows what reason. Silverlight?!?! There's no getting THAT to work on Linux!

      Luckily the online platform now works on real computers and I haven't used IQ edge since.

      I also wouldn't call IQ edge a full "success". About every 3rd time you open the app it will fail to run because you need to update it first (I've never seen any app that needed so frequent updates, especially with no noticable changes ever) , and while on Windows you can basically click the update button on the popup, wait a minute, and be running the new version, on Linux under wine you have to manually go to their website, find and download the update manually, unzip it, manually copy the files in to the correct locations, and then relaunch the app.

    3. Re:Stock-trading platforms by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      And the only reason you had any need for IQ edge was because their online platform ran Silverlight for who knows what reason. Silverlight?!?! There's no getting THAT to work on Linux!

      Lately I have had no problems in linux with either IQ Edge or their website (aside from some network access problems due to my ISP that took awhile to straighten out.) I'm not sure what your Silverlight issue is.

      Luckily the online platform now works on real computers and I haven't used IQ edge since.

      Please define what a "real computer" is?

      I also wouldn't call IQ edge a full "success". About every 3rd time you open the app it will fail to run because you need to update it first (I've never seen any app that needed so frequent updates, especially with no noticable changes ever) , and while on Windows you can basically click the update button on the popup, wait a minute, and be running the new version, on Linux under wine you have to manually go to their website, find and download the update manually, unzip it, manually copy the files in to the correct locations, and then relaunch the app.

      I have had success using wine staging which is a more cutting-edge release of wine. As for IQ Edge updates, there have been a few this year, but the number hasn't been excessive. And when the updates happen, I have found that my Wine/Linux system (Ubuntu 16.04) has accepted them gracefully with minor complaints that can be bypassed easily.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    4. Re:Stock-trading platforms by green1 · · Score: 1

      Real computer, as in one that doesn't require Silverlight.
      The reason you've had no problem lately is that lately they switched to no longer requiring Silverlight.

      And now that the website works without Silverlight, there's no longer any reason to use Edge, so there's no longer any reason to have Wine on my system.

  29. Skyrim by Tapewolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think what impressed me most was Skyrim working pretty much out-of-the box. It needed a little prodding to set the amount of VRAM up correctly, but apart from that it Just Worked. It was the first game where I'd not even bothered trying to run it via Windows at all.

    Windows hobbled on for a bit longer, occasionally curling up into a ball because I dared to put two PCIe cards in back in slightly different slots, or add a new disk for the ZFS array to use. Then, when it finally self-destructed entirely, I realised that I didn't need it anymore because all the windows games I had were working well enough under WINE. Last year I was persuaded to try Wolfenstein: New Order, and Old Blood - again, they worked out of the box which was impressive. Not sure I'll be so lucky with New Colossus.

    Games aside, it's also been very handy for running an ancient version of SONAR I've been using since about 2002. That also had the advantage of allowing me to keep using a USB MIDI interface which Windows 7 had no support for.

    Biggest disappointment was Fallout 4, which did not work out of the box and still isn't working as far as I know, though it's getting very close. FO3 and New Vegas are working happily though, even as it gets more and more difficult to run them under Windows itself.

    Obviously your mileage may vary. If you have more space and more money to throw at hardware than I do, getting a second machine - or indeed a games console - would achieve the same results with less hassle, and less cat-fighting over the boot block than a dual-boot system. Faffing around with PCIe passthroughs to get a virtual windows instance is another possible approach, but I'd have to buy another licence for an operating system I actively dislike. Besides SONAR, all my day-to-day software is linux-based, so for me, Wine is a really good way of stringing it all together.

    1. Re:Skyrim by tepples · · Score: 1

      If you have more space and more money to throw at hardware than I do, getting a second machine - or indeed a games console - would achieve the same results with less hassle

      Windows might be the better option because the console won't run game mods.

    2. Re:Skyrim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I checked, Overwatch was buggy and Diablo III had some mouse drama.

      SWTOR works great. FFXIV works great.

      Really would like help getting Greybox's "Dreadnought" working though. It needs DX11 and I'm having a devil of a time even figuring out which of the million warning is the problem. Just won't launch from installer, installer and installation work fine.

  30. Wine doesn't work out of the box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try to run anything (especially games) and you're missing libraries that you have to download with the third-party tool winetricks from a fourth-party server run by Microsoft. They can cut us off at any time. This is inherently broken, even if it's what the maintainers have to do to keep it legal. Some pirate ought to back up the libraries and make an alternative wine distro that comes with everything a user might need.

    Try running rpgmaker games. Usually, wine doesn't detect that the rpgmaker runtime has been installed. Most games have Midi background music which I've never gotten to work in Wine. Sometimes mp3s don't work either. A lot of games come out of Japan with fanmade translation patches, but Wine cannot find files in any subdirectories that include Japanese characters.

  31. Adobe Digital Editions by laymusic · · Score: 1

    It's not easy, and every few years the way you have to do it changes, but if you don't do that, you can't take ebooks out of the library, so it's worth the pain.

    1. Re:Adobe Digital Editions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This, and acrobat. i really wish that Adobe would step up to the bar on this, they have become defacto standards for certain things, and although they have no obligation to support all platforms they seem to go out of their way to ensure it doesn't work.

    2. Re:Adobe Digital Editions by israeliboy · · Score: 1

      "It's not easy" is a huge understatement.

  32. Me too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Foobar2k is the best music player I can find and I run it under Linux with Wine - love it!

  33. Firefox with Silverlight by rjr162 · · Score: 1

    All because Bluecat IPAM requires the Silverlight crap, and I was sick of firing up a VM or VDI *just* to adjust permissions on a DNS or IP record

  34. Mostly amazing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots of negative comments here. I stand in awe of the Wine project - what a terrifying overlap it must be between the Windows and Unix API worlds.... makes me shudder...

    We moved our 5 home PCs to Ubuntu a couple of years ago, and figured the Linux games market was strong enough to cover most of the family's needs - Minecraft, KSP, Portal 2, etc. When my 14 yr old son suggested we try Wine to get some of the old games running (AoE, FarCry, RtCW....), I had low expectations!

    And it took a bit of tweaking, but we got them all to come to life. The biggest impediment was that we ran into confusion over whether to go with the Ubuntu-bundled version of Wine or a later one; I think it was when we upgraded Ubuntu to 16.04 with Wine 2.x, and everything started working nicely. Amazed at how well Steam works with it - we never thought SpinTires would work, but it did, with no tweaks.

    The things that have been the least successful have been CAD applications. We build a CNC machine, and just about all the CAD software out there is for Windows and is hard to run under Wine. My suspicion is that hobby-grade-CAD developers are more CAD than devs, and commit weird sins under the hood...

  35. Mother-In-Law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My Mother-In-Law purchased tax software, installed it, used it, and transmitted her taxes using Wine. She did not even realize that she had done so using Wine on Linux instead of Windows.

    1. Re:Mother-In-Law by HxBro · · Score: 1

      Please no, I once tried my mother-in-law on wine, the results were not good!

  36. Myst by PianoMan8 · · Score: 1

    I have never successfully gotten Myst to run.

    --
    - --
    "I Hate Quotes" -- Samuel L. Clemens
    1. Re:Myst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget Wine, you can play Myst and it's sequel Riven using ScummVM. They're basically native to linux now.
      I even played Myst on my Raspberry Pi running RetroPie.

  37. Investing in GNU/Linux is better than WINE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the 2001 or thereabout a company was started called Lindows. Some might remember this company. It was a distribution that had the idea that if they just funded WINE and integrated it they'd have a Microsoft Windows compatible system and a market. Eventually, after spending millions of dollars on WINE the company realized it was NEVER going to work. So they started investing in developing native software for GNU/Linux. That actually ended up working pretty well. Now they did all sorts of things wrong particularly from a business perspective. For example they shipped systems and recommended hardware that just flat out couldn't be supported properly. Ultimately the system was unusable by the masses only because the hardware support sucked. Today it's a bit easier with companies like ThinkPenguin.com offering a properly supported selection of hardware that ship with native drivers right in the mainline kernel and similar. However that's what Lindows should have done and WINE should have never been on the companies radar. Lindows eventually became Linspire and Linspire is what became Canonical / Ubuntu. Sort of. Canonical hired a bunch of Linspire's developers and continued the downward trend of coming up with an easy to use desktop distribution.

    Humorously to one extant or another Ubuntu is more stable than Linspire ever was, but it lacks some of the polish of Linux Mint and Linspire. Unfortunately Canonical hasn't managed to figure out how to make the desktop work financially and it'll eventually collapse. Well, we're already seeing that collapse unfold.

  38. Successes: 0. Fails: 3-4 by Snotnose · · Score: 3

    It was '01 or so, last time I worked strictly on a *nix box (an x86 running Linux). I was writing device drivers at the time (PCI, 802.11, and a completely new one for the chip we were making). Could have used 3-4 Windows tools, none of them worked under Wine. FWIW I was also the sysadmin for our network of Linux boxes.

    That job ended in '03 (startup ran out of money), and little did I know it would be the last time I'd work in a *nix environment. Why? Cygwin. I could run Windows, get all the Windows programs, and still use the *nix command line tools for software development. Turns out, unless you're writing device drivers (or something I've never written), you can get by just fine with cygwin.

    I'm about to change my Win10 box to Linux. Why? Not telemetry. Not because games have become "good enough" under Linux. No. I'm sick and tired of closing my laptop for dinner, opening it up an hour later, only to find the goddamned thing has rebooted. Fuck that shit. I hate the telemetry, not a fan of the Win10 UI, like my games. But FFS, it sucks when I can't count on opening a laptop and going back to what I was doing when I closed it.

    Random rebooting. 3 words. Fuck That Shit.

  39. Large improvements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Success: Doom 2016 runs flawlessly with Vulkan thanks to a patch someone released in December.

    Also runs well: Crysis 2, Age of Empires 2 HD, starcraft 2, CEMU emulator, battle.net.

    Buggy but works: Steam

    Failures: Any game that runs on origin. Could never get it running E.g. Mass Effect 3. Most dx11 and dx12 supported titles.

    I only use it for gaming and everything else can be done using purely open source. I keep a windows 7 vm for emergencies and for testing my own software.

  40. Running a WABI environment by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 2

    Back when Wine was alpha grade software, I had a copy of Red Hat's branded WABI installed on my Slackware system. I launched Wine to run the progman.exe file in the WABI Windows environment and it loaded up the whole Windows 3 desktop.

    It was pretty cool.

    1. Re:Running a WABI environment by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Whoops, my mistake. I found the manual here. It was Caldera's release of Wabi 2.2.

    2. Re:Running a WABI environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back when Wine was alpha grade software

      Why didn't you just say "this morning"?

    3. Re:Running a WABI environment by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Because, frightening as it must seem, Wine was alpha grade software back in 1995, too.

  41. The Penguin Hutchinson Library CD. by Elf+M.+Sternberg · · Score: 2

    The 1996 Penguin Hutchinson Encyclopedia Library (PHRL96). I keep that running in a Wine-managed desktop window more or less constantly; I've tried on-line encyclopedias like Artha and Panlexicon and even Wordnet, and the thesaurus in PHRL96 is still the best one I own. Also: Half-Life. The original. Recently re-played it, and it works wonderfully.

  42. Skype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Skype is being built on ReactXP, delivering the same client across all platforms including Linux. No need to run Skype through WINE.

    https://microsoft.github.io/re...

    1. Re:Skype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  43. Dialog's Production Line Tool failed. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

    Dialog Semiconductor's Production Line Tool (a GUI-driven BLE chip programming tool) was not available to run under Linux - or anything but Windows 7, 7-pro, 8, or 8.1 - all now made of unobtanium.

    It would run (kinda) on wine with mono and a real Microsoft .NET install. But some important GUI components didn't render correctly, so necessary operator feedback fields were not readable, making it unusable.

    (When our 7-Pro machine goes belly-up the lab is toast.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:Dialog's Production Line Tool failed. by Asteconn · · Score: 1

      A cautionary tale I think about relying too much on a single proprietary technology or ecosystem. When that technology is inevitably retired, the dependent system is then in jeopardy.

  44. Re:No USB, so no can do by green1 · · Score: 1

    Exactly this. The only things I ever need Windows for are for connecting proprietary devices via USB to make configuration tweaks or update firmware. These devices have no software for any OS other than Windows, and require a USB connection to do the updates.

    Wine can't do that, which means Linux can't do that. Which means I need a full blown Windows install available to me just to update junk hardware.

    Beyond that I see absolutely zero reason to run any Windows only program. There's so much high quality software available for Linux that usually works even better than the Windows equivalent that I never even consider trying to run a Windows program through Wine.

    Basically the Wine devs are focusing all their energy in the wrong places. It's those stupid one off hardware update programs that need addressing, not yet another copy of a program that already has a superior native Linux application that does the same thing better anyway.

  45. Windows == single-source critical resource by fgouget · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why no government has invested in Wine.

    The NSA intercepts and modifies Cisco routers, introduces vulnerabilities in security standards, does not hesitate to intercept Google's cross-datacenter traffic, forces US ISPs to install black boxes for monitoring, and pulls all kinds of other stunts. But despite Microsoft being in the same jurisdiction as the NSA and possibly subject to various secret orders, most countries just happily depend on Windows, going so far as using it in their armies!

    If Windows were to suddenly disappear the economy of most countries would instantly crash: banks, ATMs, airports, travel agencies, even some fuel stations; none of these would work without Windows. They all use software that would need to be rewritten from scratch to be ported to another platform, an endeavor that would take years. That makes Windows a critical resource, one for which there should be multiple sources, just like for oil, etc. Yet, if you need Windows there is only one company you can turn to: Microsoft.

    Given the number of custom Windows applications involved, the only credible way to fix this situation is to improve Wine. And improving Wine is easy when you have a government's budget: even hiring 10 competent developers to contribute to Wine full-time would make a significant difference. If only five countries in the world did that it would more than double the number of developers working on Wine full-time!

    1. Re:Windows == single-source critical resource by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't Russia invest in ReactOS?

  46. docs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when is "extensive documentation" "two or three paragraphs"?

  47. Re:Successes: 0. Fails: 3-4 by phantomfive · · Score: 1

    I recently switched back to Linux after many years away. No regrets at all.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  48. Diablo 3 out of the box on release day by suso · · Score: 1

    Having used wine since the 90s, it was still quite a milestone for me at least that I was able to buy Diablo 3 on release day, install and play it in wine without problems, I played that game all the way to the end. Platinum. Bravo Wine devs, Bravo.

  49. Adobe Audition 1.0 by ichthus · · Score: 1

    Works flawlessly in Wine, and is still better than Audacity. Hell, Cool Edit from 1998 is better than Audacity.

    Other Wine wins:
    Half Life 1 (pre Steam)
    UltraVNC viewer (better than remmina)
    Keil uVision, except for debugging.

    --
    sig: sauer
  50. Lakmus-Test by qbrick · · Score: 1

    Greatest Success: Installing Heroes of Might & Magic 3 in 2005.
    Greatest weakness: Not being able to install said program anymore in 2017.

  51. PlayOnLinux includes the missing features and sux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PlayOnLinux is pretty much required to run more than a few programs with Wine, and it's still only marginally easier than just manually configuring multiple instances of Wine. Why doesn't Wine include this functionality (POL is just executed so poorly).

  52. DDO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Got me Dungeons and Dragons Online up and running ~ 5 years ago. Portals did not appear, and it didn't look _quite_ as good as on Windows, but the whole interface was more responsive.

  53. What we have here is a failure to communicate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear editors:

        Successes and Failures *or* Strengths and Weaknesses

    Go directly to middle school -- do not pass GO -- do not collect $200.

  54. I love Wine! by Xenolith0 · · Score: 1

    In a previous, misguided life, I had used windows, for almost a decade. After all the Windows Telemetry BS, I decided, Windows and me couldn't be friends anymore.

    For the last, almost two years now, I've been using Linux (Fedora) full time on both my Desktop and Laptop. Pretty much the only Windows applications that I couldn't find decent Linux replacements of were foobar2000, Password Safe (https://pwsafe.org/) (pwsafe has an open-source Linux version, it sucks donkey balls), and of course, photoshop. passwordsafe, and foobar2000 both run GREAT in wine. I didn't have to do any sort of tweaking to get them up and running. Photoshop CS5, was another story. I never could get it to run correctly without crashing or having graphical glitches, and in the end just gave up and installed a windows VM just for Photoshop.

  55. Re:Successes: 0. Fails: 3-4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But FFS, it sucks when I can't count on opening a laptop and going back to what I was doing when I closed it.

    That's actually a problem I've had, on-and-off, with my various linux laptops for years.

  56. Success: Fallout 3. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Works like a charm.

    Other than that, I tend to avoid Wine and also don't really need it these days.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  57. Star Trek Online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For both. Worked for awhile but as the game updated it lost compatibility then gained it back, etc. etc. So both wins and losses

  58. Windows software on USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A full portable Linux OS on my USB stick, _including_ MS Office 2007! Portable MS Office! All my colleagues are jealous :-D

  59. For legacy software it's fine by bothorsen · · Score: 0

    Some years ago I suddenly had a craving to revisit the mid 90'ies games I had played. WINE was perfect for this, as Windows - even with compatibility modes - didn't exactly like games like Colonization or Warcraft 1.

    For something like this, WINE is really good because it runs old stuff quite well.

    For all new software, You're Doing It Wrong (TM) if you use WINE. An OS is just a tool, so run the one that the software was designed for. Native or in a VM, doesn't matter. But don't use something inferior when you can have the real thing.

  60. Sketchup and HeidiSQL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sketchup 2016 took a while to get running, but it's working well now.
    HeidiSQL works immediately and is one of the few windows programs I still use.

    Once tried to get a tax application (wrapped mshta.exe based crap) working on wine, but gave up on it.

  61. Where did "failure" go? by ContextSwitch · · Score: 1

    Question asked:

    what have been your greatest successes and failures

    Slashdot headline:

    What Are Your Greatest Successes and Weaknesses

    Are we afraid of the word "failure" now?

  62. Windows is for filing income tax, nada más. by jwbales · · Score: 0

    For 18 years I have kept a Windows partition on my Linux box for one reason only: to file my income tax once a year. Neither H&R Block nor TaxCut software runs on wine. Same with Crossover. Unless you want to fill out your returns by hand and mail them it, you MUST use Windows or Macintosh to file your taxes. And you know what happens when you boot into Windows after a year--updates. :O

  63. My take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I regularly run the following applications for their Linux alternatives largely suck:

    * Adobe Photoshop CS2
    * Far file manager
    * Mp3tag
    * IrfanView
    * NotePad++ // b.

  64. Not needing it by houghi · · Score: 1

    My greatest success is that I do not need it. The one program, I need to run on Windows once a year I use an old laptop. I have also configured it that I can connect remotely to it.
    I could use a VM, but having a remotely accessible box is much easier.

    With the prices that hardware are, having a dedicated machine that you connect to remotely is so much easier.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  65. Re:Successes: 0. Fails: 3-4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Windows 10, open Settings -> Update & Security -> Windows Update -> Restart options -> Enable the "Show more modifications" button

    With that enabled, the system will never just randomly reboot. You'll get a toaster-style notification pop up so that you can reboot or dismiss an immediate reboot when it's available. I point this out because it amazes me how many fucking nerds have NO FUCKING IDEA how to configure the operating system they love to complain about. People like you prefer to whine rather than solve your own problems. IT'S FUCKING INFURIATING!

  66. If only there was a database by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'd think Wine would keep a database and link it from the main page on http://winehq.org so people could share their findings and save each other a lot of time.

  67. Re:No USB, so no can do by tender-matser · · Score: 1

    I'm using qemu+kvm with pass-thru usb for that.

    I've even hacked qemu so that a usb device could appear inside the vm with a different vendor or product id than the real one (I don't know if they implemented such a feature in qemu or in the usb subsystem of the linux kernel since then).

    Qemu has also the advantage that it lets you extend the evaluation period of any software indefinitely, by faking the time inside the vm using its "-rtc base=etc" option and using the -snapshot feature to discard any permanent changes.

  68. emulation by DrYak · · Score: 1

    I think that relates to "native performance" and "no emulation".

    It happens that games usually rely on an API (Direct X up to 11) that doesn't exit on Linux and has no close equivalent.
    For games you need a whole emulation layer that will emulate a Direct X API by using the closest API Linux has (usually OpenGL).

    Lots of games DO work, but they still get some performance hit and require an emulation of sort (even if a high-level one).

    Though currently, the things are changing :
    - Most games are slowly switching to the low-level Vulkan API, which does exist as-is on Linux, so wine can function as the usual translation layer. (e.g.: Doom (2016) )
    - DirectX 12 has nothing to do with past iterations of DirectX and is a similar low-level API to Vulkan. Meaning that simple DirectX 12 to Vulkan thin translation layer could be possible. (currently being worked on)
    - There are attempts of building DirectX 9 and 10/11 drivers running on low-level APIs existing on linux (either on top of Vulkan, or on top of Mesa' Gallium3D - the low-level back-ends used traditionally on Linux by high-level API state trackers - except by Nvidia's). This could also potentially avoid the overhead of DirectX over OpenGL emulations.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:emulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For games you need a whole emulation layer that will emulate a Direct X API by using the closest API Linux has (usually OpenGL).

      That's called API translation, and is a whole lot faster than emulation.

      Just like when Windows translates between the Win32 and NT API.

    2. Re:emulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That isn't emulation, it's a wrapper. It's no different than how Windows has to wrap Direct3D around OpenGL.

      I have no concern for DX12, as nothing uses it and it's a dead-end API. Vulkan being multiplatform is the future.

  69. WinMerge on OSX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Works better than Meld, doesn't do multi file comparisons though. Still looking for a good native OSX merge tool... and WinMerge/Wine is only about 400 MB, not too bad for such a complex program ;-)

  70. powerpoint viewer by e70838 · · Score: 1

    The windows XP laptop of my parents was becoming almost unusable because of slowness. I wanted to migrate them to a small desktop with ubuntu. Like old people, they receive many powerpoint documents. The perfect working of powerpoint viewer with wine was a condition sine qua none for my plan. It is working perfectly since 2013.

  71. work & home by sad_ · · Score: 1

    When i started working, they still used Lotus Notes as a mail server in the late 90's. Ofcourse there was no native Linux client, but it worked perfectly in wine.
    At home, also around that period, or maybe a little later, i used a product from codeweavers to enable windows only browser plugins. It was a sad period on the internet when a lot of sites used plugins that were not available on Linux, worked fine using the codeweavers wine browser implementation (although, a bit high on CPU usage).

    Other than that, i was able to run WoW when it came out faster then all my friends who ran it native in windows.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    1. Re:work & home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other than that, i was able to run WoW when it came out faster then all my friends who ran it native in windows.

      Yes, because Wine ignores a shit-ton of Direct3D calls and was HEAVILY tweaked to run WoW, saving you a lot of rendering time. The casual user won't notice the loss of image quality, nor would they have the skill to implement the same changes on the Windows version to get the same benefits.

  72. WinSCP; HeidiSQL ; Keepass2 by nv2r · · Score: 1

    WinSCP for occasional editing of webpages + Pageant (part of Putty tools) to supply private key. But I got to write custom wrapper to make WinSCP launch native editor. Together that makes a usable combination. HeidiSQL and KeePass2 work without any significant glitches, I use them on daily basis.

  73. Re:Successes: 0. Fails: 3-4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Random rebooting. 3 words. Fuck That Shit.

    First of all, no serious user should use a laptop, period. They are always wonky pieces of fragile shit and slower than any comparable desktop. Second, you'll have major headaches using Linux on a laptop. Suspend/Resume operations are rarely reliable. Ask around.

  74. Re:Successes: 0. Fails: 3-4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That really doesn't mean much. Case in point: I had a high school classmate who cut off his dick and changed his gender to a woman. He also said he has no regrets. Coincidentally, every time I've had to use Linux felt like dating a transsexual. It doesn't feel right and leaves me feeling icky.

  75. Re:No USB, so no can do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where did you get the idea that wine doesn't talk usb?

    I RE several scientific instruments with an USB interface by looking at what their proprietary software was doing under wine...

    it worked fine.

  76. Falcon BMS and GOG stuff by hoover · · Score: 1

    I mostly use WINE for Falcon BMS (I hope to migrate it to Linux fully once win7 support ends) and for running some GOG.com stuff, and most of the stuff works out of the box. Maybe your screen is fscked upon exit but that's no biggie really as you can reset it just fine using the display settings (wine staging in Mint 18.2).

    The biggest failure was trying to get some software provided by our daughter's school to run... wouda thunk given it was "just" some VB atrocity?

    --
    Ever wondered whats wrong with the world? http://www.ishmael.org/
  77. It runs the Sony Entertainment virus by thisisauniqueid · · Score: 1

    I found a copy of the virus that was used to exfiltrate data from Sony Entertainment's computers and then wipe them (supposedly the virus was developed by North Koreans, in response to the movie The Interview, but actually, my own forensics suggest that the authors were South Korean). In the process of studying the virus, I must have accidentally double-clicked on the executable in Nautilus when I was trying to drag it to move it into another directory. For whatever stupid reason, Nautilus is set up to run Windows executables in Wine when they are double-clicked. A couple of minutes later, I noticed files were starting to disappear all over my hard drive. I panicked and held down the power button for 5 seconds to hard-shutdown the computer. Sure enough, when I rebooted, I discovered that tens of thousands of files were gone. It's a real victory for Linux compatibility with Windows when Wine can run viruses just as well as Windows.

  78. Re:Successes: 0. Fails: 3-4 by short · · Score: 1

    I have this problem of random sudden reboots with my Lenovo X220 notebook running Linux. I believe it is due to its hardware/firmwares. And sure I use the notebook only as a thin terminal for a beefy rack server so in the end it does not matter much.

  79. Adventure Game Studio by tsa · · Score: 1

    I review free adventure games for Adventure Gamers each month. Many of them are made in Adventure Game Studio. These run perfectly in wine on the Mac. I hardly ever have to reboot into Windows to be able to play a free adventure game.

    --

    -- Cheers!

  80. Re:Successes: 0. Fails: 3-4 by tsa · · Score: 1

    What I also hate is when I start Win10 up and I have to wait 15 minutes because the bloody thing is updating itself. Why can't it do that in the background, or at least let me choose when I f*** want it to update??

    --

    -- Cheers!

  81. Re:Successes: 0. Fails: 3-4 by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    No. I'm sick and tired of closing my laptop for dinner, opening it up an hour later, only to find the goddamned thing has rebooted

    If you can't even RTFM and get the most basic of Windows settings right you're not going to be happy with Linux.

  82. Almost all of my Windows programs work by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

    From Win3/NT I've run almost every version of windows in a dual boot manner. Many programs I use are an install once, move many.
    I created a separate directory for them off of the C: Drive, and installed them there.

    Now with Linux Mint I can go to that programs directory, right click on the executable, and run with wine. It works very well for me.

    My only loss is PowerPro http://powerpro.cresadu.com/ it's so integrated into Windows it's a waste of time trying to get it to work.

  83. 5 success stories, 1 failure by reiscw · · Score: 1

    Successes: Office 2007, Euchre game (euchreusa.com), Epson wireless projector software for work (this is a HUGE success, it lets me run Linux in my classroom), Pearson test generator software, and Matlab R14 (original license was Windows, I don't have a licensed Linux version).

    Failures: H&R Block tax software (which is cheaper than using their website).

    All of these were tested with Crossover 16.2.5. I'm happy to support them - they make a quality product and help support the Wine project.

    I also agree with another poster who mentioned that Wine is pretty much the best way to run 16-bit Windows applications. I have a REALLY old version of MATLAB (5.3) that works only with Wine.

  84. Kindle by Crispy+Critters · · Score: 1
    Success: I have been running Amazon's Kindle for PC under Wine for years. This (plus Calibre) allows me to put Kindle ebooks on my non-Kindle e-ink device. If I had an installable licensed copy of MSWindows and a PC that would run it under a VM, I would do that, but Kindle runs under Wine on my 10-year-old Thinkpad.

    Failure: I have never trusted Wine enough to run Turbotax on it.

  85. Book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I should write a book. Wine has been a huge help in my transition to GNU/Linux over the last 2 years.

    My top 3 successes using Wine are, in order: 1) Voobly + Age of Empires 2: The Forgotten Empires, 2) Pale Moon Portable with Google Voice audio calling, and 3) Irfanview.

    Voobly is a matchmaking site for the classic RTS game, Age of Empires 2. Technically I use PlayOnLinux to make things easier for myself, but it depends on Wine. I have this working on Fedora 25/systemd, and Devuan 1.0/init. It works on my devu an install on an old Dell Latitude D630, better than in the Windows 7 install I used to have on that hardware.

    Pale Moon Portable, so the Windows portable edition, which I carried around on a flash drive for years before setting on a daily driver system, which I would rebuild every so many years. It started as Firefox 2.x Portable and around the Firefox 27 days I switched to Pale Moon. Anyways, it runs just fine in Wine and after some dedicated research got the Google voice audio calls working in it.

    Irfanview, the graphics viewer. It runs wonderfully in Wine, and is pretty basic.

  86. Wine is nice for games but not reliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First of all, the good part: Wine is cool because it sometimes actually WORKS and that is a major accomplishment.
    The Windows API is actually a huge collection of APIs, with multiple, sometimes incompatible versions, continuously evolving and only partially documented, with only the closed-source windows implementation as a guideline for how the API actually is supposed to work.
    The fact that wine can even deal at all with the complexity of DirectX, D3D etc, at least until DirectX9, is something to marvel at.
    So congrats are due to Alexandre Julliard and all the other contributors for the basic infrastructure that resisted surprisingly well an organic evolution to start dealing with windows 3 and ending up with modern 32bit and 64bit Windows, and in particular I think Stefan Doesinger for the incredible work on DirectX/D3D.

    Now the not so good part: I have hacked wine for years in order to get all kinds of software working (mostly games). Some of my patches are in wine, some are not. I have considered wine for some migration projects, but in business environments it is just not usable, because the application compatibility is so hit or miss.
    And, more importantly, it just changes from version to version, with zero control on actual progress.
    In general the development process is just not focused on application compatibility, which would be the only business reason to use wine in the first place.
    There are regression tests in the code, but the tests themselves have not been validated for full completeness and correctness. Nowadays they run them on windows native too, but the coverage of API parameters is just too low.

    There is no application compatibility regression testing, but wine does asks random people to report if applications are working or not (on the Wine AppDB):

    https://appdb.winehq.org/

    These results are not uniform and there are so many different setups and variables and patches around that the results are not really comparable.

    Look at the difference with dosbox (ok much simpler problem to solve, but still). Dosbox actually track basic working usecases, for each version:
    https://www.dosbox.com/comp_list.php?letter=a

    This makes dosbox actually useful. You can use the latest version and you know it is better than the previous one.
    By contrast, in wine each new version is a hit or miss. Applications might break.
    Old reported errors are considered closed or auto-solved after years of being "abandoned" (usually by the user either dying or giving up I guess)

    To sum it up, it is an incredible technical exercise, great for games if you are willing to put the development effort in to choose the right wine version and fix the bugs yourself for that specific version, but not destined for any business use for Windows to Linux migration, because of lack of: a) project focus on measurable progress, b) some applications sometimes never ever working, c) regressions

    With appropriate funding and direction, possibly it could have been different, but if we haven't seen it happen in the 90s or early 2000s we are probably not seeing it happen now. Still I hope these guys keep hacking at this, if only for the games!

  87. Empire At War by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    Getting direct X working and running the game was cool!

    Make sure you have the right drivers for your graphics card under linux!

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  88. Re:No USB, so no can do by green1 · · Score: 1

    The problem is that this still involves agreeing to a Microsoft EULA and all its overreach.
    The point isn't "how can I run Windows?" It's "how can I avoid running Windows?"

  89. Quicken - The Last Barrier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was finally able to switch my Mother over to GNU/Linux this year. Why? Quicken 20xx (can't remember exactly which one) finally works reliably under Wine.

    She was already using Firefox, Libreoffice, and Thunderbird. She doesn't do anything else with the computer. Her Vista machine was dying the typical Microsoft death of a thousand blue screens. I showed her other programs beside quicken, but she was unwilling to even try any other financial program. Finally this Summer her version installed and ran without any problems under Wine, so I burned Windows off the machine with fire and installed Xubuntu 16.04 LTS. She loves it.