I would be more concerned regarding the required power to actually "Beam" it back down to earth. No doubt the beam will be in a laser form which will probably waste 90%+ of the power received from the cells.
Give it another 10 years, ask the question again when the technology is actually "ready". Have they really ran out of polls to ask, requiring them to ask questions about the future in which we cant yet truly understand?
Until then. You might as well ask if people would be willing to let their satnavs tell them where to go?
The TV license system in the UK is old. Some hate it, however, for £12 a month its gives me full access to the BBC i Player. I can download/stream great TV from the BBC without any adverts.
All the BBC need to do, is allow streaming/downloading of old programs. Once they master this, for me, its the only way TV as we know it will expand for the companies and its users.
Yes, the BBC doesn't offer other channels or programs which they do not own, however, their wide offering of programs is unique and doesn't require premium costs for "sports coverage" etc.
The current TV/cable structure is stuck in the past. Yes, the BBC has had it easy with their required TV license funds, but, they are a prime example of what the future needs, and, how to achieve it.
Until that time comes, TPB and BBC i player are the only things i have time for. I cant stand to watch another advert, and, Netflix fails to offer "everything".
Really don't get the point of these articles. Trying to spin everyone into a orgy dispute.
At the end of the day, the only thing that will decrease latency is your programming skill. Your ability to write efficient, logical code is more important than what language you use to do it.
People who use C++ will say C++ is better, those who use Java will say Java is better. The only way to test this is to write a simple program in each language (using the same logic) and test it. Instead of having these stupid "hearsay" Java articles, why not do some benchmarks?
"he says, but in the end, no matter the language, the methodology or the underlying OS, all programming is about telling computers what to do -- from "add these numbers" to complex text manipulation"
Biggest load of garbage i've ever heard. - The type of language is very important, if he took the time to learn C++ correctly. Instead of changing his name, he would see that. - Methodology is a big factor, its what makes the program run. Without it, we end up with buggy/slow programs written in substandard languages like Python/Java by "wannabe's".
Programming is not just about telling a machine what to do. Its how to complete that task with efficiency/stability, an artform by the creator. Then again, if you cant be bothered to learn C++, i very much doubt performance will ever truly be a part of your coding methods.
If i change my name to "Bob dot Wannabe", you think i can have dreams like "Ingy döt Net" and change the world with half arsed experience?
Welcome to the future of bubble wrapping: - Which never really works, BT blocks TPB, but, really hasn't. - Where parenting is no longer required. No need to teach your kids anything. The government has created a safe/censored world for you to live in. - Where new jobs (using tax payers money) are created for the sole purpose of making a decision for you.
People need their own right to make their own decisions in life, its what shapes it. Take that away, and their chance to make a mistake or learn from it. We will just end up being anything but unique.
I live in the UK, when this comes to effect, i will be 1st to call my ISP and request they turn the filter off. Not so i can use it (i might, you never know), but, for the whole concept that i like to control what i do with my life.
Quote from http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/ubuntu-edge "For a phone to run a full desktop OS, it must have the raw power of a PC. We’ll choose the fastest available multi-core processor, at least 4GB of RAM and a massive 128GB of storage."
Instead of coding Gnome with efficiency in mind, or, any common sense. Just put the fastest parts you can in a phone to hide its terrible code and performance?
Yeah, honestly, what a joke this is. Whats wrong with android? Nothing! Gnome+Ubuntu mobile will just be a slower/buggier/bloater version of android, which is already near-perfect.
$32 million to make this happen, best of luck. If it succeeds, it will just confirm the world is mostly full of idiots.
Currently the only way to achieve a "snappier" windows is to spend a few hours disabling services, setting up admin, removing the prehistoric driver database.
Each windows version actually gets slower due to business/corporate designs and protection, instead of the optimizing the home users performance.
Take Windows XP x64 for example, probably the only OS you'll ever need. If only MS didnt abuse their control of their users and force an upgrade for DX10/11 etc, you'd see alot more happier home users.
Everytime i install a new OS, i disable around 90% of the inbuilt services, i'am not running a business or a fax machine, and, enable admin account. But for those who dont have this knowledge, theres always UAC, admin disabled login to protect them and their systems.
I think thats the way its always going to be. If you know what your doing and how to achieve it, you can. If you dont, it wont bother you because you unaware of what performance gain can be made, and, the overkill protections built into todays windows will protect even the most "disastrous" user.
Every day, i look at Kickstarter games.
Each day passes with a new Concept/idea, but, very rarely do i actually see any product.
Its great to have an idea, or, a concept. But most of these "games" are just that, and, rely on "cheating" the people who fund the idea into a possible product.
Throwing money at a idea is dangerous for both the company and the buyers, especially, if the company has no sense of direction or core game to work on.
Two problems:
- 1. The people who pay silly money for a "concept/idea".
- 2. The dev team who make a few renders, a few ideas, no actual real "gameplay" content. Then ask for funding goals which have just been thought up in 2 minutes.
I'am currently producing a game, its cost me £0 to make so far.
It may show up on KS one day, but, only when the "core gameplay/content" is solid enough.
I would be embarrassed to show a few concept art/renders and say "we need 1 million to make a game".
The end rule, throwing money at a "idea" can actually do more harm than good. The more you have, the easier it is to spend, especially, when its been managed so badly.
MWO is a prime example of this.
Slashdot Mirror
Give it a week.
No doubt Tesla will create another 25+ page document to try and justify everything.
USA forces ready to strike anywhere in the world?
USA forces ready to pick on Syria to control Oil production?
I would be more concerned regarding the required power to actually "Beam" it back down to earth.
No doubt the beam will be in a laser form which will probably waste 90%+ of the power received from the cells.
Energy efficient, i very much doubt it lol
Its a case of resetting your taste buds:
Drink Nescafe Original all day, every day.
Any type of coffee you try from now on will be luxury.
Give it another 10 years, ask the question again when the technology is actually "ready".
Have they really ran out of polls to ask, requiring them to ask questions about the future in which we cant yet truly understand?
Until then. You might as well ask if people would be willing to let their satnavs tell them where to go?
What's Causing the Rise In Obesity? Your inability to control what you put in your mouth?
Is it really that hard to understand?
"You are what you eat".
Next we will be blaming the Ozone layer for the rise of Obesity. Wake up lol
The TV license system in the UK is old. Some hate it, however, for £12 a month its gives me full access to the BBC i Player.
I can download/stream great TV from the BBC without any adverts.
All the BBC need to do, is allow streaming/downloading of old programs. Once they master this, for me, its the only way TV as we know it will expand for the companies and its users.
Yes, the BBC doesn't offer other channels or programs which they do not own, however, their wide offering of programs is unique and doesn't require premium costs for "sports coverage" etc.
The current TV/cable structure is stuck in the past. Yes, the BBC has had it easy with their required TV license funds, but, they are a prime example of what the future needs, and, how to achieve it.
Until that time comes, TPB and BBC i player are the only things i have time for. I cant stand to watch another advert, and, Netflix fails to offer "everything".
Really don't get the point of these articles. Trying to spin everyone into a orgy dispute.
At the end of the day, the only thing that will decrease latency is your programming skill.
Your ability to write efficient, logical code is more important than what language you use to do it.
People who use C++ will say C++ is better, those who use Java will say Java is better.
The only way to test this is to write a simple program in each language (using the same logic) and test it.
Instead of having these stupid "hearsay" Java articles, why not do some benchmarks?
"he says, but in the end, no matter the language, the methodology or the underlying OS, all programming is about telling computers what to do -- from "add these numbers" to complex text manipulation"
Biggest load of garbage i've ever heard.
- The type of language is very important, if he took the time to learn C++ correctly. Instead of changing his name, he would see that.
- Methodology is a big factor, its what makes the program run. Without it, we end up with buggy/slow programs written in substandard languages like Python/Java by "wannabe's".
Programming is not just about telling a machine what to do. Its how to complete that task with efficiency/stability, an artform by the creator.
Then again, if you cant be bothered to learn C++, i very much doubt performance will ever truly be a part of your coding methods.
If i change my name to "Bob dot Wannabe", you think i can have dreams like "Ingy döt Net" and change the world with half arsed experience?
Should i keep my old vinyls as the CD has taken over?
It really is down to you, only you know what you really want to achieve.
- If your only interested in the content, just copy the files.
- If you only interested in the source container, keep it.
Welcome to the future of bubble wrapping:
- Which never really works, BT blocks TPB, but, really hasn't.
- Where parenting is no longer required. No need to teach your kids anything. The government has created a safe/censored world for you to live in.
- Where new jobs (using tax payers money) are created for the sole purpose of making a decision for you.
People need their own right to make their own decisions in life, its what shapes it. Take that away, and their chance to make a mistake or learn from it.
We will just end up being anything but unique.
I live in the UK, when this comes to effect, i will be 1st to call my ISP and request they turn the filter off.
Not so i can use it (i might, you never know), but, for the whole concept that i like to control what i do with my life.
Whatever next, in the bubble wrap world..........
Quote from http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/ubuntu-edge
"For a phone to run a full desktop OS, it must have the raw power of a PC. We’ll choose the fastest available multi-core processor, at least 4GB of RAM and a massive 128GB of storage."
Instead of coding Gnome with efficiency in mind, or, any common sense. Just put the fastest parts you can in a phone to hide its terrible code and performance?
Yeah, honestly, what a joke this is.
Whats wrong with android? Nothing!
Gnome+Ubuntu mobile will just be a slower/buggier/bloater version of android, which is already near-perfect.
$32 million to make this happen, best of luck. If it succeeds, it will just confirm the world is mostly full of idiots.
Honestly, i have no idea why they did this survey. Surely sales figures speak for themselves?
http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/books/2013/05/15/e-book-sales/2159117/
"even as digital books remain the fastest-growing part of the market. They now account for about 20% of all book sales reported by publishers."
That pretty much matches what the survey has confirmed, and, sales figures is more reliable data after looking at the question formatting.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/business/econ_survey_questions/july_2013/questions_e_books_july_11_12_2013
Currently the only way to achieve a "snappier" windows is to spend a few hours disabling services, setting up admin, removing the prehistoric driver database.
Each windows version actually gets slower due to business/corporate designs and protection, instead of the optimizing the home users performance.
Take Windows XP x64 for example, probably the only OS you'll ever need. If only MS didnt abuse their control of their users and force an upgrade for DX10/11 etc, you'd see alot more happier home users.
Everytime i install a new OS, i disable around 90% of the inbuilt services, i'am not running a business or a fax machine, and, enable admin account.
But for those who dont have this knowledge, theres always UAC, admin disabled login to protect them and their systems.
I think thats the way its always going to be.
If you know what your doing and how to achieve it, you can.
If you dont, it wont bother you because you unaware of what performance gain can be made, and, the overkill protections built into todays windows will protect even the most "disastrous" user.
Every day, i look at Kickstarter games. Each day passes with a new Concept/idea, but, very rarely do i actually see any product. Its great to have an idea, or, a concept. But most of these "games" are just that, and, rely on "cheating" the people who fund the idea into a possible product. Throwing money at a idea is dangerous for both the company and the buyers, especially, if the company has no sense of direction or core game to work on. Two problems: - 1. The people who pay silly money for a "concept/idea". - 2. The dev team who make a few renders, a few ideas, no actual real "gameplay" content. Then ask for funding goals which have just been thought up in 2 minutes. I'am currently producing a game, its cost me £0 to make so far. It may show up on KS one day, but, only when the "core gameplay/content" is solid enough. I would be embarrassed to show a few concept art/renders and say "we need 1 million to make a game". The end rule, throwing money at a "idea" can actually do more harm than good. The more you have, the easier it is to spend, especially, when its been managed so badly. MWO is a prime example of this.