Yeah, where abusing them for not emulating their parents' psychosis is apparently fully legal. Loved that realization growing up. Still feel like bashing several people's skulls in. Wouldn't damage anything of worth for sure. Funny, thing is that the A Beka curriculum's attempt at disproving evolution presents convincing evidence for evolution. They're really that stupid. Sadly, most of the kids never recover. Some even notice.
Most useful collision warnings would require you know what the hell they were indicating within a split second. Instead, you'll be busying being startled by whatever the hell your car's doing to notice. The rest of the information you're suggesting would also slow your capacity to respond to any given issue. There's a reason fighter jets have relatively minimal information displayed. The information overload gets pilots killed more than it can help.
Then why come the idiots I dealt with in childhood are even dumber than I thought? They never improved with age. You can't fix stupid. You can enshrine it with culture arbitrarily privileging norms and elders though. So many argument on the net result in some elder wanting to know age and trying to pull rank or performing the equivalent of quoting regs. The latter gets a bit less irritating and more amusing when the norms change and their attempt blows up in their face. Just have to hope they don't get that damn antiquated bigot pass.
Speaking as someone who had to endure exactly that course, it's bullshit. The normed and the bullshitters passed easily. I got lowered grades despite the teacher admitting I was the only one putting thought into anything. What's that tell you? Of course, more depressingly, the same thing happen in philosophy classes, expect the better grades went to stoners that couldn't form coherent paragraphs.
Glacial intellect here I come. Can I be a "ignorant" teenager again already? For a insomniac cynic, I was way more optimistic and slept far better only knowing what I did then. Wasn't really wrong then either, just less excruciating detail regarding how fucked everything was. Here I thought I'd forget.
Newton was wrong and a nutcase. Gravity can be easily tested and approximation held up decently. What climate scientists are doing is pretty circular at the moment. They've a long train of failed models without ever pausing their preaching some fictitious "the model" and still can't account for immediate or past phenomena. They just use credentials and slurs.
Actually, upwards of 10% of men remain perma-virgins, and, by far, most women are sleeping with the same minority of guys. Pretending to hook up a lie-detector ridiculously alters the numbers, much less asking about the kinds of sex supposedly occurring within a given time frame. Men will not only drop their numbers but will admit to counting brushing past a girl, while women will spike their numbers and admit to not counting "rebound" intercourse.
You're claiming a non-criminal act should be a criminal act because anyone who does it is a criminal? How about we stick to criminals performing actual criminal acts? That's less psychotic...
"Fair" would be preclusive to most who need it. They need it precisely because they can't pay their own bills. Those who can don't need it because they can.
Proposition, unless you recursively meant the "it" in "it's". Reality existing's tautologous. Reality existing beyond belief should be obvious, or you'd have no category of belief beyond reality, and the two would be synonymous. You'd either be a reality warper or psychotic. You'd probably be psychotic eventually anyway or dead. Humans make incontinent reality warpers. You'd "misbelieve" and hurt yourself, if not the universe itself then/and yourself as a result. Consider what'd happen if you considered for a moment whether you exist then panicked even slightly. *poof*
Judging by the rhetoric, that seems to be precluded. There was a clear implication that the wife somehow has claimed all dark chocolate in the relationship, as gynocentrically chauvinistic as that is. Speaking of realistic stereotypes that'll set off the feminazis...
Uh, being near and occasionally in Charlotte. There's a significant and growing portion of the population here that didn't like Buffalo either, despite being born there.
That doesn't actually work on humans. I'm not homosexual, so self-rating's not possible, and my libido's not anyone else's as their's isn't either. I'm rarely attracted to supposed 9's and 10's of others. As a rule, someone says "hot". I probably don't find her attractive. The one's I find adorable don't usually score that high on most other gynophiles ratings. Besides, anything less than strong attraction fizzles. Compatibility isn't a factor without attraction, so there's not else to speak of.
Slashdot Mirror
Yeah, where abusing them for not emulating their parents' psychosis is apparently fully legal. Loved that realization growing up. Still feel like bashing several people's skulls in. Wouldn't damage anything of worth for sure. Funny, thing is that the A Beka curriculum's attempt at disproving evolution presents convincing evidence for evolution. They're really that stupid. Sadly, most of the kids never recover. Some even notice.
...thEY becAme kangaroo courtS.
FTFY
Most useful collision warnings would require you know what the hell they were indicating within a split second. Instead, you'll be busying being startled by whatever the hell your car's doing to notice. The rest of the information you're suggesting would also slow your capacity to respond to any given issue. There's a reason fighter jets have relatively minimal information displayed. The information overload gets pilots killed more than it can help.
You're not respectful in enforcing your preferences on others. Shove your pretentious golden rule authoritarianism, You sleazy myopic hypocrite.
Because that's how blue collar guys get laid? Keep it classholic, Feminazi.
Then why come the idiots I dealt with in childhood are even dumber than I thought? They never improved with age. You can't fix stupid. You can enshrine it with culture arbitrarily privileging norms and elders though. So many argument on the net result in some elder wanting to know age and trying to pull rank or performing the equivalent of quoting regs. The latter gets a bit less irritating and more amusing when the norms change and their attempt blows up in their face. Just have to hope they don't get that damn antiquated bigot pass.
Speaking as someone who had to endure exactly that course, it's bullshit. The normed and the bullshitters passed easily. I got lowered grades despite the teacher admitting I was the only one putting thought into anything. What's that tell you? Of course, more depressingly, the same thing happen in philosophy classes, expect the better grades went to stoners that couldn't form coherent paragraphs.
Glacial intellect here I come. Can I be a "ignorant" teenager again already? For a insomniac cynic, I was way more optimistic and slept far better only knowing what I did then. Wasn't really wrong then either, just less excruciating detail regarding how fucked everything was. Here I thought I'd forget.
Hail, Eris!
Newton was wrong and a nutcase. Gravity can be easily tested and approximation held up decently. What climate scientists are doing is pretty circular at the moment. They've a long train of failed models without ever pausing their preaching some fictitious "the model" and still can't account for immediate or past phenomena. They just use credentials and slurs.
Doctors give antibiotics for VIRAL diseases all the time. Good luck suing for malpractice too. Someone's a soft headed little believer...
Actually, upwards of 10% of men remain perma-virgins, and, by far, most women are sleeping with the same minority of guys. Pretending to hook up a lie-detector ridiculously alters the numbers, much less asking about the kinds of sex supposedly occurring within a given time frame. Men will not only drop their numbers but will admit to counting brushing past a girl, while women will spike their numbers and admit to not counting "rebound" intercourse.
You're claiming a non-criminal act should be a criminal act because anyone who does it is a criminal? How about we stick to criminals performing actual criminal acts? That's less psychotic...
"Fair" would be preclusive to most who need it. They need it precisely because they can't pay their own bills. Those who can don't need it because they can.
Proposition, unless you recursively meant the "it" in "it's". Reality existing's tautologous. Reality existing beyond belief should be obvious, or you'd have no category of belief beyond reality, and the two would be synonymous. You'd either be a reality warper or psychotic. You'd probably be psychotic eventually anyway or dead. Humans make incontinent reality warpers. You'd "misbelieve" and hurt yourself, if not the universe itself then/and yourself as a result. Consider what'd happen if you considered for a moment whether you exist then panicked even slightly. *poof*
Of course, because your shit don't stink. Go back on your meds...
Judging by the rhetoric, that seems to be precluded. There was a clear implication that the wife somehow has claimed all dark chocolate in the relationship, as gynocentrically chauvinistic as that is. Speaking of realistic stereotypes that'll set off the feminazis...
Uh, being near and occasionally in Charlotte. There's a significant and growing portion of the population here that didn't like Buffalo either, despite being born there.
Bullshit. You're already attacking. Just aim for the neck. You'll hit at least 1 artery, aside from an damage to the throat.
Knives... They're big in Britain now. Doubt that'll get through the propaganda that's replaced you excuse for a mind though.
What discussion?
Paying for what one uses isn't the same as paying for what someone else uses, You self-righteous pychotic moron.
Don't be dick includes not enslaving others under pretense of "greater good" propaganda...
Jackpot or jackshit?
That doesn't actually work on humans. I'm not homosexual, so self-rating's not possible, and my libido's not anyone else's as their's isn't either. I'm rarely attracted to supposed 9's and 10's of others. As a rule, someone says "hot". I probably don't find her attractive. The one's I find adorable don't usually score that high on most other gynophiles ratings. Besides, anything less than strong attraction fizzles. Compatibility isn't a factor without attraction, so there's not else to speak of.