You just bored or didn't actually get it's a vehicle envy thing? They wanted SUVs. They're getting SUVs. No further analysis needed. They want drones and military weaponry too. Guess what...
More creative? You even pretending to count only post-US-existing, or are you referring to Native Americans? Most technological leaps since the ancient world weren't European. Most pretenses while accomplishing little to nothing were. French isn't remotely the language of science anymore for a reason. Europeans touting tolerance though's a laugh. They kissass certain special cultures, often while ignoring any unpleasant consequences of said cultures. Otherwise, they're smug and hypocritical as fuck all. And if you meant historically tolerant, that better be joke 'cause DAMN...
Or flipping on the lights a split second to run a red light, while speeding, almost hitting people on a regularly basis at the same damn light. That takes skill...or drugs.
Being 6'4", I have to drive with my head stabilized against the roof, when I'm not ducking to see the stop light. If I sit further back, either I can't steer properly, or my head bounces off the top of the windshield when braking and occasionally the top of door when turning right. The seatbelt will stop my body in about the nicest possible position to snap my damn neck, if the airbag doesn't do it first and better. Without it, I'd more evenly flatten out against the wheel AND ceiling and not have the motion of my body suddenly so completely out of kilter with my head, expect under some odd, probably already lethal circumstance.
Uh, neurological differences could easily affect ability, and neurological differences verifiably exist. Not saying one way or the other about the reality of this specific case, but PCness sure as fuck doesn't define its limits. You need to layoff those special pleading backed arguments from ignorance. Granted that means no more "feminist theory"...
Considering the top two reasons girls explicitly give are that it's too hard and that geeks(not geek chic hipster poseurs) are icky, they really don't want that publicized...unless they're bashing male geeks as creepy misogynous losers who need to be trained to service any female that bothers to enter the room to whatever capacity your average female chauvinists have pushed (in)equality to now...probably plus whatever new level the radfem/fecademics are gunning for. Depending on the audience and which face is currently talking, of course.
Those defining "disease" are often preying on people. Call your ends "good" or "healthy", indoctrinate enough sheeple to back you, field enough sheeple dogs with authoritay; then, you've just redefined "good" thus are the "good guy". Most shrinks have proven arbitrary, political, and quite happy to lie to themselves. Empathy doesn't prevent that. It FACILITATES that. Politics wields "morality" all the time. Empathy is subverted to political ends by "moral" indoctrination as a rule. Besides, most people's bare "empathy" is as fucked up as really applying that damn "golden rule". It's just codified myopic sanctimonious bigotry.
And a very good excuse to smear the queer...who tends to just be whoever's in their "holy" way. "Nice" is just political term. When invoked, it's exclusively predefined to preclude dissent. Any sub-terms are circularly defined or thought terminating cliche. "Rude" is anyone not behaving as ordered by the special people that get to define "nice" to match their agenda. Anyone that disobeys should be "helped" to obey, like a good little sheeple. Strong resistors (or just the wrong kind of special people) "deserve" punishment from the sheeple dogs/jackels. They must be taught to obey for "niceness" sake...
"POLITICS, n. A strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. The conduct of public affairs for private advantage." Ambrose Bierce (AKA "morality")
Most happily warp their own perceptions of situations to make themselves the "good" guy while they fuck people over. Heard of doublethink? How about propaganda for transmitting the same to others? Psychopaths are ironically more sane and less sloppy.
You're not the arbitrator of any conversation, yet you're pretending to sit in judgment. Do you have anything to add that isn't you being just pretentiously pissy and still utterly hyporcritical?
It's hypocritical to claim the entire conversation to your preferences while claiming your opposition are claiming the conversation by not submitting to your claim, duh. You really don't comprehend that? Next up, how you're being "persecuted" I'm sure...
Wait... They rewrote the definition to fit that damn cheesy tvshow?! Since when? It originally meant that you made technology that resemble the functioning, often even the appearance, of biology, like Dune's ornithopters vs a helicopter.
"the use of biological prototypes for the design of man-made synthetic systems. To put it in simpler language: to study basic principles in nature and emerge with applications of principles and processes to the needs of mankind." Dr. Jack E. Steele (original coining in ~'60)
White females are special in their get-out-of-everything-free card, but crime stats say black female beats white male though. Sexism's worse than racism among LEOs, prosecutors, and judges.
Would work in my state, even with evidence. Rear-end collisions are legally the fault of the rear car. No technical solution here that doesn't involve forcing legislature to change...or somehow blowing them off with impunity.
You do know people don't need authorization to disprove you? They're not limited to your assumptions. I've had plenty of "smooth" drivers pull into my lane without signaling as all the lanes were compressing at a red light. A lane transition would involve me "merging" my car with either that car entering my lane or the car already in the next lane.
Slashdot Mirror
I can't afford that. It's not mine. Neither's the house. Student loans are about to get fun too, possibly before the degree.
Through the floor?
You just bored or didn't actually get it's a vehicle envy thing? They wanted SUVs. They're getting SUVs. No further analysis needed. They want drones and military weaponry too. Guess what...
More creative? You even pretending to count only post-US-existing, or are you referring to Native Americans? Most technological leaps since the ancient world weren't European. Most pretenses while accomplishing little to nothing were. French isn't remotely the language of science anymore for a reason. Europeans touting tolerance though's a laugh. They kissass certain special cultures, often while ignoring any unpleasant consequences of said cultures. Otherwise, they're smug and hypocritical as fuck all. And if you meant historically tolerant, that better be joke 'cause DAMN...
Seeing texture's not tactile. Tactile in terms of intellect or learning refers to manual manipulation anyway.
Or flipping on the lights a split second to run a red light, while speeding, almost hitting people on a regularly basis at the same damn light. That takes skill...or drugs.
Being 6'4", I have to drive with my head stabilized against the roof, when I'm not ducking to see the stop light. If I sit further back, either I can't steer properly, or my head bounces off the top of the windshield when braking and occasionally the top of door when turning right. The seatbelt will stop my body in about the nicest possible position to snap my damn neck, if the airbag doesn't do it first and better. Without it, I'd more evenly flatten out against the wheel AND ceiling and not have the motion of my body suddenly so completely out of kilter with my head, expect under some odd, probably already lethal circumstance.
Uh, neurological differences could easily affect ability, and neurological differences verifiably exist. Not saying one way or the other about the reality of this specific case, but PCness sure as fuck doesn't define its limits. You need to layoff those special pleading backed arguments from ignorance. Granted that means no more "feminist theory"...
Considering the top two reasons girls explicitly give are that it's too hard and that geeks(not geek chic hipster poseurs) are icky, they really don't want that publicized...unless they're bashing male geeks as creepy misogynous losers who need to be trained to service any female that bothers to enter the room to whatever capacity your average female chauvinists have pushed (in)equality to now...probably plus whatever new level the radfem/fecademics are gunning for. Depending on the audience and which face is currently talking, of course.
Oh, so many pretentious hypocrites, so little time. You know, You guys are everywhere claiming everything for your special ends...
It's already been so defined. That's why they officially dropped it, which says a lot, considering what else they've kept.
Those defining "disease" are often preying on people. Call your ends "good" or "healthy", indoctrinate enough sheeple to back you, field enough sheeple dogs with authoritay; then, you've just redefined "good" thus are the "good guy". Most shrinks have proven arbitrary, political, and quite happy to lie to themselves. Empathy doesn't prevent that. It FACILITATES that. Politics wields "morality" all the time. Empathy is subverted to political ends by "moral" indoctrination as a rule. Besides, most people's bare "empathy" is as fucked up as really applying that damn "golden rule". It's just codified myopic sanctimonious bigotry.
And a very good excuse to smear the queer...who tends to just be whoever's in their "holy" way. "Nice" is just political term. When invoked, it's exclusively predefined to preclude dissent. Any sub-terms are circularly defined or thought terminating cliche. "Rude" is anyone not behaving as ordered by the special people that get to define "nice" to match their agenda. Anyone that disobeys should be "helped" to obey, like a good little sheeple. Strong resistors (or just the wrong kind of special people) "deserve" punishment from the sheeple dogs/jackels. They must be taught to obey for "niceness" sake...
"POLITICS, n. A strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. The conduct of public affairs for private advantage." Ambrose Bierce
(AKA "morality")
Most happily warp their own perceptions of situations to make themselves the "good" guy while they fuck people over. Heard of doublethink? How about propaganda for transmitting the same to others? Psychopaths are ironically more sane and less sloppy.
You're not the arbitrator of any conversation, yet you're pretending to sit in judgment. Do you have anything to add that isn't you being just pretentiously pissy and still utterly hyporcritical?
It's hypocritical to claim the entire conversation to your preferences while claiming your opposition are claiming the conversation by not submitting to your claim, duh. You really don't comprehend that? Next up, how you're being "persecuted" I'm sure...
No, you do not get to keep your smug hypocritical presumption of some holy right of way when conversing with others.
Exactly, a nice global reduction of sheeple.
Wait... They rewrote the definition to fit that damn cheesy tvshow?! Since when?
It originally meant that you made technology that resemble the functioning, often even the appearance, of biology, like Dune's ornithopters vs a helicopter.
"the use of biological prototypes for the design of man-made synthetic systems. To put it in simpler language: to study basic principles in nature and emerge with applications of principles and processes to the needs of mankind." Dr. Jack E. Steele (original coining in ~'60)
You do realize feminazi patriarchy bullshit rests on the official face-people of the teeny tiny elite being male, right?
Not to those that actually paid for it, duh.
White females are special in their get-out-of-everything-free card, but crime stats say black female beats white male though. Sexism's worse than racism among LEOs, prosecutors, and judges.
Would work in my state, even with evidence. Rear-end collisions are legally the fault of the rear car. No technical solution here that doesn't involve forcing legislature to change...or somehow blowing them off with impunity.
You do know people don't need authorization to disprove you? They're not limited to your assumptions. I've had plenty of "smooth" drivers pull into my lane without signaling as all the lanes were compressing at a red light. A lane transition would involve me "merging" my car with either that car entering my lane or the car already in the next lane.
Curious, what'd Linus have for diner yesterday? Or have gotten quite that far up his digestive tract yet?