Avoid drinking people. That stupid asshole epidemic, alcohol makes it exponentially worse. Granted, fucked if I know how they supposedly manage to get drunk off that piss.
You have any idea how much indigestion and building rage that would cause? I've eaten cold salmon out of a can and cold soggy oatmeal to avoid bleating sheeple at uni. It was less sickening. I'm not babysitting during my lunch break...if I actually get one.
Didn't you read the shrink bibles? Normed insanity gets a pass. The queers those wackos smear though have "social disorders". (Ironic, queers were written out, so no more lobotomies for them.) This's literally written in the details of either bible from either side of the pond. What's not written is that shrinks are functionally politician-priests now and act as such. Circularly "legitimate" authoritay+circularly moralized (pseudo)"scientific" righteousness=(as "spiritual fitness"/"positive psychology"/snake oil saleman Seligman put it)"rockstar" with "fame and money".
Consider what most soldiers actually consider "freedom" too. Most weren't fighting for many rights at all, but the expectation of denying them. They were fighting for their own myopic rights to authoritarianism. Only a tiny minority throughout history ever believed in freedom of speech, for instance. Most believe in enforcing sexism (mostly for women, ironically) and general religious or quasi-religious "tradition" based privileges.
Then there's insisting on innocence, on the explicit grounds they got paid to do whatever shit they did. No sense of irony there at all. The Nuremberg defense was always very popular in the US among the government's proud attack dogs, on and off their pissing grounds, which they even expanded. Remember the colonies that didn't want anything to do with the Feds to begin with? The Army took care of that and the following rebellions of the unwilling citizenry. Know how we "liberated" Hawaii from its population? That's obviously leaving out the tradition of the Army vs the continental natives...and even white pioneers they pretended to be "civilizing" the property of(f).
Depending on what he thought he was doing and why, yes, very much so. We've got a better argument than almost all the evangelical politicos who natter and troll all the time here...and a great many now on this very topic. Besides, I recall mixing religion with politics, much less warfare, being something of an issue...at least if a conservative does it.
And if what they're saying is so trivial it should be ignored, possibly by everyone present? "Politeness" as is is just politics. Your example would immediately fall into a blatantly obvious catch22, which figures since it's a game for sleaze. Stop pretending most of this shit, present or past, was ever anything else. "Professional", likewise, is almost always just a thought terminating cliche to cover sleaze making threats while babbling psychotically.
You're confusing political clout for respectability. That's exactly what fot most of them there and little else.
There's a big difference from demanding an amazingly boring, pretentious wankfest and not playing along like a good mindless little bitch too, but, considering your former "respect" conflation, you wouldn't comprehend the latter at all.
"If you want to imagine the future imagine" the worse parts of Idiocracy and the Borg. We provide the technology. They'll provide the teaming masses of idiots to drown us all out, either by silencing/shunning or by making sure we play along, while we service them.
Don't kid yourself. We're not inheriting anything. The politicos already won. They're prepared to harass, assault, and kill, and they can get away with it. We just give them better tools.
Elitist doesn't just mean whatever you want it to mean when you feel like it, You greedy hypocritical sanctimonious myopic bigot. You "moral" elitists are a joke. Your sophistic "social" weaseling doesn't entitle you to manufacture debts to fit your crazed designs. You don't own anyone and should expect resistance when you try enslaving people under the pretenses of your cause. Playing self-appointed priest to some reification of "Man" grants you no special rights and absolves you of absolutely nothing in pursuit of enforcing your delusions.
Funny, the FCC's long history of content censorship smugly disagrees with this assertion even on the federal level. Local laws get away with even more niggling bullshit all the time.
Considering most people aren't paying into the pretense of a system what they cost, and that a great many worthless jobs are created with tax money just to pretend they're doing something to earn the pay(out), I think you're failing to grasp what overpopulation is. Squeezing us all into the creeping totalitarian regime that'd be the metaphorical sardine can here necessary to remotely approach a "maximum population" isn't OK.
So they're "serfs" for feeding on hosts? Moralized shell games don't hide the hypocritical parasitism.
Venture capital and the risk entailed creates jobs. Someone having a coherent fucking clue and a decent implementation creates jobs.
Your average grunt is an sniveling idiot, which is easily verifiable by most any poll on anything. In a mob, they can beat their collective chests and ironically bray about their superiority, but they can't plan, build, or run a business. They just run through the paces of whatever function they were trained for, usually ditching that if someone's not monitoring, which they'll bitch about either way; then, they claim they're owed the whole fucking company, which they don't even comprehend. Funny who's claiming entitlement here. Your preaching sanctomonious envy, clearly with the intent of eventual pretense of righteous force.
Removing corruption would be one thing, but you just want coercision that profits you, while hiding behind reifications. You probably don't even comprehend that though. Those convenient fictional "we"'s that exclude or forgive your bullshit and incompetence, even as they're proudly characterized by them.
That last was a bit ambiguous. What's social norms have to directly do with this? Seeking personal approval from others? Normalizing your pseudo-legacy unit's programming? To be kind-ish, I could guess informing the child's expectation of others' probable notions of normality, though that wouldn't necessarily suggest direct immersion, anymore than promoting the child's involvement with hookup culture (at some presumed "right" age at least) or the like.
Circular argument and intentional selection bias. "Success" there requires constant redefinition to fit whatever the fuck happens. It's both a no true Scotsman fallacy and changing the goalposts. When the "positive" wacko misses something, he pulls a doublethink and redefines his supposed values such that his altered goals arbitrarily fit whatever he happen to hit, so he "succeeded" to hit his completely redefined target. Being unhappy because you're not mindfucked into wanting whatever garbage you're stuck with isn't "no good purpose". Just because your values are lies your constantly rewrite to fit arbitrary conditions doesn't make everyone else's values as utterly meaningless as yours are. Some of us actually value what we value. Shocking, I know...
The majority of theists in the US report believing atheists to be pathological (worse than rapists, being one such claim) and have no problem harassing them under pretense of "helping" the stupid crazy bastards. Their notion of persecution is not being allowed to conduct open harassment and enforce authoritarian laws based on their religious dogma (which as a rule never follows from the "holy" source material, natch). The military recently had a "spiritual" fitness test. Lashing would be too old school, but they got new shit they're certainly aching to inflict.
Banning religion, sure. Loyalty to the State has nothing to do with atheism. That's pretty fucking religious actually. Self-appointed "priesthood of Man" and all that quasi-religious "humanism"/"progressivist" dogma...
Ironically, insufficiently popular religions or dominations are called cults. The theists already "deprogram" them unconstitutionally, currently under the aegis of the APA's politically-based pathologizing, and the feds raid them, even without significant legal violations to justify the disturbingly brutal force. Atheism would at least have apolitical psychology on its side since schizophrenia only explicitly excludes popular religious shit currently due to politics.
Private ownership refers to a general right of any given individual. This is rather counter to stealing, much less enslavement, both being clear violations of ownership. Bloody feudalism was capitalism by your strawman, which is contrary to what the word was explicitly coined to contrast to. You're also describing nothing less than corporations with your weaseling cooperation=socialism equivocations. Pretty fucking sure your mill's shareholders were seeking to profit from their incorporation. Your "property-less" union is a sham. You'd have to enforce it thus, under pretense of "no property" stealing everything from everyone, including enslaving everyone under that pretenses of "union" and "society", then profiting whatever internal bloc gains hegemony under pretense of "greater good" or even "equality". "Freedom is slavery." and all that. Collectivism explicitly doesn't abide dissent. Anyone not obeying is "stealing" from "society". Someone would define whose "good" is "greater" and get to "equalize" "society".
Capitalism is just private ownership of capital. Socialism is "collective" ownership of capital. The former means you have options. The latter options you as means. You're not actually describing capitalism or socialism. Cooperation doesn't constitute "socialism", and, ironically, the goalposts erected by you aren't yours to change here. In a socialist state, everyone who's not politically special is property. It's just permanent indentured servitude to REALLY pretentious hegemonic bloc.
Socialism is authoritarian. It claims all property for a bureaucracy, which incidentally makes you state property. It's outright slavery. To acquire anything is solely up to the State's allowance and to "own" anything requires the State's perpetual permission. You live and die by fiat in the name of a reification you're explicitly wholly subordinated to.
"You are a true believer. Blessings of the state, blessings of the masses. Thou art a subject of the divine. Created in the image of man, by the masses, for the masses. Let us be thankful we have an occupation to fill. Work hard; increase production, prevent accidents, and be happy."
Slashdot Mirror
Then fists.
Avoid drinking people. That stupid asshole epidemic, alcohol makes it exponentially worse. Granted, fucked if I know how they supposedly manage to get drunk off that piss.
You have any idea how much indigestion and building rage that would cause? I've eaten cold salmon out of a can and cold soggy oatmeal to avoid bleating sheeple at uni. It was less sickening. I'm not babysitting during my lunch break...if I actually get one.
Didn't you read the shrink bibles? Normed insanity gets a pass. The queers those wackos smear though have "social disorders". (Ironic, queers were written out, so no more lobotomies for them.) This's literally written in the details of either bible from either side of the pond. What's not written is that shrinks are functionally politician-priests now and act as such. Circularly "legitimate" authoritay+circularly moralized (pseudo)"scientific" righteousness=(as "spiritual fitness"/"positive psychology"/snake oil saleman Seligman put it)"rockstar" with "fame and money".
Consider what most soldiers actually consider "freedom" too. Most weren't fighting for many rights at all, but the expectation of denying them. They were fighting for their own myopic rights to authoritarianism. Only a tiny minority throughout history ever believed in freedom of speech, for instance. Most believe in enforcing sexism (mostly for women, ironically) and general religious or quasi-religious "tradition" based privileges.
Then there's insisting on innocence, on the explicit grounds they got paid to do whatever shit they did. No sense of irony there at all. The Nuremberg defense was always very popular in the US among the government's proud attack dogs, on and off their pissing grounds, which they even expanded. Remember the colonies that didn't want anything to do with the Feds to begin with? The Army took care of that and the following rebellions of the unwilling citizenry. Know how we "liberated" Hawaii from its population? That's obviously leaving out the tradition of the Army vs the continental natives...and even white pioneers they pretended to be "civilizing" the property of(f).
Depending on what he thought he was doing and why, yes, very much so. We've got a better argument than almost all the evangelical politicos who natter and troll all the time here...and a great many now on this very topic. Besides, I recall mixing religion with politics, much less warfare, being something of an issue...at least if a conservative does it.
Damn, was thinking similarly but didn't quite have the words, and I just ran out of points too.
And if what they're saying is so trivial it should be ignored, possibly by everyone present? "Politeness" as is is just politics. Your example would immediately fall into a blatantly obvious catch22, which figures since it's a game for sleaze. Stop pretending most of this shit, present or past, was ever anything else. "Professional", likewise, is almost always just a thought terminating cliche to cover sleaze making threats while babbling psychotically.
You're confusing political clout for respectability. That's exactly what fot most of them there and little else.
There's a big difference from demanding an amazingly boring, pretentious wankfest and not playing along like a good mindless little bitch too, but, considering your former "respect" conflation, you wouldn't comprehend the latter at all.
Oh, they've encyclopedic knowledge ABOUT it. They just never actually DO it.
"If you want to imagine the future imagine" the worse parts of Idiocracy and the Borg. We provide the technology. They'll provide the teaming masses of idiots to drown us all out, either by silencing/shunning or by making sure we play along, while we service them.
Don't kid yourself. We're not inheriting anything. The politicos already won. They're prepared to harass, assault, and kill, and they can get away with it. We just give them better tools.
Elitist doesn't just mean whatever you want it to mean when you feel like it, You greedy hypocritical sanctimonious myopic bigot. You "moral" elitists are a joke. Your sophistic "social" weaseling doesn't entitle you to manufacture debts to fit your crazed designs. You don't own anyone and should expect resistance when you try enslaving people under the pretenses of your cause. Playing self-appointed priest to some reification of "Man" grants you no special rights and absolves you of absolutely nothing in pursuit of enforcing your delusions.
If the label fits...
Funny, the FCC's long history of content censorship smugly disagrees with this assertion even on the federal level. Local laws get away with even more niggling bullshit all the time.
Naturally? You keep using this word...
Considering most people aren't paying into the pretense of a system what they cost, and that a great many worthless jobs are created with tax money just to pretend they're doing something to earn the pay(out), I think you're failing to grasp what overpopulation is. Squeezing us all into the creeping totalitarian regime that'd be the metaphorical sardine can here necessary to remotely approach a "maximum population" isn't OK.
So they're "serfs" for feeding on hosts? Moralized shell games don't hide the hypocritical parasitism.
Venture capital and the risk entailed creates jobs. Someone having a coherent fucking clue and a decent implementation creates jobs.
Your average grunt is an sniveling idiot, which is easily verifiable by most any poll on anything. In a mob, they can beat their collective chests and ironically bray about their superiority, but they can't plan, build, or run a business. They just run through the paces of whatever function they were trained for, usually ditching that if someone's not monitoring, which they'll bitch about either way; then, they claim they're owed the whole fucking company, which they don't even comprehend. Funny who's claiming entitlement here. Your preaching sanctomonious envy, clearly with the intent of eventual pretense of righteous force.
Removing corruption would be one thing, but you just want coercision that profits you, while hiding behind reifications. You probably don't even comprehend that though. Those convenient fictional "we"'s that exclude or forgive your bullshit and incompetence, even as they're proudly characterized by them.
That last was a bit ambiguous. What's social norms have to directly do with this? Seeking personal approval from others? Normalizing your pseudo-legacy unit's programming? To be kind-ish, I could guess informing the child's expectation of others' probable notions of normality, though that wouldn't necessarily suggest direct immersion, anymore than promoting the child's involvement with hookup culture (at some presumed "right" age at least) or the like.
It's not PC, entertaining to the soft-headed escapist majority (those are related...), and doesn't line snake-oil salesmen like Seligman's pockets.
Circular argument and intentional selection bias. "Success" there requires constant redefinition to fit whatever the fuck happens. It's both a no true Scotsman fallacy and changing the goalposts. When the "positive" wacko misses something, he pulls a doublethink and redefines his supposed values such that his altered goals arbitrarily fit whatever he happen to hit, so he "succeeded" to hit his completely redefined target. Being unhappy because you're not mindfucked into wanting whatever garbage you're stuck with isn't "no good purpose". Just because your values are lies your constantly rewrite to fit arbitrary conditions doesn't make everyone else's values as utterly meaningless as yours are. Some of us actually value what we value. Shocking, I know...
Losing privilege isn't punishment. Their egos are just so used to that pussy pass...
The majority of theists in the US report believing atheists to be pathological (worse than rapists, being one such claim) and have no problem harassing them under pretense of "helping" the stupid crazy bastards. Their notion of persecution is not being allowed to conduct open harassment and enforce authoritarian laws based on their religious dogma (which as a rule never follows from the "holy" source material, natch). The military recently had a "spiritual" fitness test. Lashing would be too old school, but they got new shit they're certainly aching to inflict.
Banning religion, sure. Loyalty to the State has nothing to do with atheism. That's pretty fucking religious actually. Self-appointed "priesthood of Man" and all that quasi-religious "humanism"/"progressivist" dogma...
Ironically, insufficiently popular religions or dominations are called cults. The theists already "deprogram" them unconstitutionally, currently under the aegis of the APA's politically-based pathologizing, and the feds raid them, even without significant legal violations to justify the disturbingly brutal force. Atheism would at least have apolitical psychology on its side since schizophrenia only explicitly excludes popular religious shit currently due to politics.
Private ownership refers to a general right of any given individual. This is rather counter to stealing, much less enslavement, both being clear violations of ownership. Bloody feudalism was capitalism by your strawman, which is contrary to what the word was explicitly coined to contrast to.
You're also describing nothing less than corporations with your weaseling cooperation=socialism equivocations. Pretty fucking sure your mill's shareholders were seeking to profit from their incorporation.
Your "property-less" union is a sham. You'd have to enforce it thus, under pretense of "no property" stealing everything from everyone, including enslaving everyone under that pretenses of "union" and "society", then profiting whatever internal bloc gains hegemony under pretense of "greater good" or even "equality". "Freedom is slavery." and all that. Collectivism explicitly doesn't abide dissent. Anyone not obeying is "stealing" from "society". Someone would define whose "good" is "greater" and get to "equalize" "society".
Capitalism is just private ownership of capital. Socialism is "collective" ownership of capital. The former means you have options. The latter options you as means. You're not actually describing capitalism or socialism. Cooperation doesn't constitute "socialism", and, ironically, the goalposts erected by you aren't yours to change here. In a socialist state, everyone who's not politically special is property. It's just permanent indentured servitude to REALLY pretentious hegemonic bloc.
Socialism is authoritarian. It claims all property for a bureaucracy, which incidentally makes you state property. It's outright slavery. To acquire anything is solely up to the State's allowance and to "own" anything requires the State's perpetual permission. You live and die by fiat in the name of a reification you're explicitly wholly subordinated to.
"You are a true believer. Blessings of the state, blessings of the masses. Thou art a subject of the divine. Created in the image of man, by the masses, for the masses. Let us be thankful we have an occupation to fill. Work hard; increase production, prevent accidents, and be happy."