Slashdot Mirror


User: Guest316

Guest316's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
125
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 125

  1. At least American bill acronyms are pronounceable. PCFIPA?

  2. Re:Same story, different time on Spooked By His Sci Fi, FBI Looked Into Asimov As Possible Communist Tipster · · Score: 1

    Seriously? You need me to hold your hand all the way through the quoted statement? OK, here:
    >the Germans, whom we crushed (or helped crush)

  3. "End Of The Line" documentary on Scientists Says Jellyfish Are Taking Over the Oceans · · Score: 1

    http://www.hulu.com/watch/197316 Very relevant. Set aside an hour to watch this. Free to watch, though you have to put up with ad breaks.

  4. Re:Ethical fishing on Scientists Says Jellyfish Are Taking Over the Oceans · · Score: 1

    Japan has a history of blaming everything other than themselves for their shortage of favorite seafood.

    Well, so do most people in general, but Japan relies on (read: overfishes) the ocean quite a bit and makes rather a dramatic fuss when they can't get as much as they want. Basically, yes there's a problem worldwide, but as usual Japan is pointing fingers in the wrong direction for their depleted fish populations.

  5. Re:Same story, different time on Spooked By His Sci Fi, FBI Looked Into Asimov As Possible Communist Tipster · · Score: 1

    One of my favorite stories was from when the House Un-American Activities Committee was investigating alleged Communist infiltration of Hollywood after WW2. Peter Lorre was one of those interviewed by investigators, and asked to name anyone he thought might be suspicious. True to his character, he started listing every person he'd ever met until the Committee'd finally had enough and dismissed him. Unfortunately, I doubt current investigators would have enough sense of humor to respond as mildly to a similar stunt.

  6. Re:Same story, different time on Spooked By His Sci Fi, FBI Looked Into Asimov As Possible Communist Tipster · · Score: 1

    >We have not done any wrong to the French, for example, but they hate us more than the Germans, whom we crushed (or helped crush) in two wars.
    No, "we" didn't. The USA of the 1940s did.

  7. Re:WTF? on You're Only As Hirable As Your Google+ Circles · · Score: 1

    Not to mention that you'll be required to use Google products if you plan to ever get hired anywhere.

  8. Re:Llamasoft announced THEY were approached on TxK, Tempest 2000 Remake for PS Vita Demoed · · Score: 1

    Yep, they now have multiple sheep. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZth7t--hd4

  9. Re:permissions on Edward Snowden's New Job: Tech Support · · Score: 1

    >I'm getting pretty fed up with people excusing fucked up behavior by claiming, 'waaah, but morals are hard!'
    He didn't say "hard," he said "not universal." I know, the words look pretty similar, it's an easy mistake to make.

    >Remember one rule: treat every other person the way you want to be treated.
    That always gets me slapped. :/

  10. Flicker fusion rate on GPUs Keep Getting Faster, But Your Eyes Can't Tell · · Score: 1

    Your eyes might not gain much benefit, but your dog's flicker fusion threshold is somewhere up to 80Hz. How's Fido supposed to enjoy TF2 at your paltry 60Hz refresh?

  11. HA! HA! on Police Use James-Bond-Style GPS Bullet · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is why I keep the back of my car coated in vaseline. Checkmate, Johnny Law!

  12. Re:USA Freedom Act on Even the Author of the Patriot Act Is Trying To Stop the NSA · · Score: 1

    OK. How?

  13. Re:Let's be clear. on Federal Prosecutors, In a Policy Shift, Cite Warrantless Wiretaps As Evidence · · Score: 1

    >The problem is the long settled law invariably deals with (a) border searches or (b) searching of individuals outside the US.
    You seem to be forgetting the "I smell marijuana" clause.

  14. Re:Constitution free zone on Feds Confiscate Investigative Reporter's Confidential Files During Raid · · Score: 1

    >Next they will start to shoot journalists
    That's so last century. There are more exciting high-tech to dispose of pesky journalists.

  15. Re:I donâ(TM)t suppose... on Feds Confiscate Investigative Reporter's Confidential Files During Raid · · Score: 2

    It can't be legal seizure of notes if the search warrant was for weapons.

    Oh snap. And now that various gummint officials have read those notes, they're no longer private. Abracadabra!

  16. Re:Happiness & Pleasure on The Neuroscience of Happiness · · Score: 1

    >pleasure always comes with pain.
    We have all eternity to know your flesh.

  17. Re:The best defense... on Feds Confiscate Investigative Reporter's Confidential Files During Raid · · Score: 1

    I think you mean spin doctors. I doubt elderly unmarried women will figure particularly strongly in this. On your last point though, if you really think there's nothing left to lose after your job, you haven't thought things through very well. Maybe when all their loved ones are already dead and the whistleblowers themselves are on death row, you can have that argument.

  18. Re:Where is the public outrage? on Feds Confiscate Investigative Reporter's Confidential Files During Raid · · Score: 1

    Remember back in school when you didn't want the teacher to call on you to answer a question? I suspect a lot more people are hunched down like that these days, and will stay that way as long as everyone is comfortably supplied with food and shelter and tv and Internet.

  19. Re:Bragging about torture on Citizen Eavesdrops On Former NSA Director Michael Hayden's Phone Call · · Score: 1

    Slip a glove over the end of one of the rockets. Was that really so hard?

  20. Re:Obligatory on 1.5 Meter Long Meteorite Fragment Recovered From Russian Lake · · Score: 2

    Drinking wasn't illegal. People who saw Prohibition coming and could afford it stocked up on booze, and as long as they weren't making/selling/distributing it, they were legal.

  21. Re:Is this important? on DOJ: Defendant Has No Standing To Oppose Use of Phone Records · · Score: 1

    I'm having trouble following your logic. If the guy was calling "friends in Minnesota" then he's obviously entitled to his Constitutional rights, but once he looks a little shady it's OK to retroactively allow any sort of surveillance he happened to get caught in as evidence, whether it conforms to the letter or spirit of the 4th Amendment or not?

    A phone conversation between a caller in the US and one in a foreign nation still involves one of "the people," to use the Constitution's preferred phrasing.

  22. Re:Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? (Latin) on Could Snowden Have Been Stopped In 2009? · · Score: 1

    And this is a classic case of omnia dicta fortiora si dicta Latina.

  23. Re:Countering on Google ToS Change Means Your Photo Could Go In Ads · · Score: 1

    I was just about to suggest that everyone change their profile pics to gore or offensive porn. Yeah, use that in your ads! Hell, I don't even want to be on Google+, but there doesn't seem to be any way of opting out except deleting any google-related accounts you might have, since they're going to force you to join sooner or later.

  24. Re:Extremeophiles on Diamond Rain In Saturn · · Score: 1

    Scientists refuse to comment on reports of what appears to be a fox and a cat aboard a sailing vessel crossing one of the expanses of liquid diamond.

  25. There's no need to compromise anonymity, NSA on US Intelligence Chief Defends Attempts To Break Tor · · Score: 1

    I've erected a "Terrorism-Free Zone" sign in front of my building.