Slashdot Mirror


Scientists Says Jellyfish Are Taking Over the Oceans

Hugh Pickens DOT Com writes "Karla Cripps reports at CNN that a combination of overfishing, warming water, low oxygen and pollution are creating perfect conditions for jellyfish to multiply. "The jellyfish seem to be the ones that are flourishing in this while everything else is suffering," says Australian jellyfish researcher Lisa-ann Gershwin. In 2000, a bloom of sea tomato jellyfish in Australia was so enormous — it stretched for more than 1,000 miles from north to south — that it was even visible from space. While most blooms are not quite that big, Gershwin's survey of research on jellyfish from the last few decades indicate that populations are most likely on the rise, and that this boom is taking place in an ocean that is faced with overfishing, acid rain, nutrient pollution from fertilizers and climate change, among other problems. This past summer, southern Europe experienced one of its worst jellyfish infestations ever. Experts there have been reporting a steady increase in the number of jellyfish in the Mediterranean Sea for years. With more than 2,000 species of jellyfish swimming through the world's waters, most stings are completely harmless, some will leave you in excruciating pain, then there are the killers. There are several species of big box jellyfish that have caused many deaths — these include chironex fleckeri in Australia, known as the "most lethal jellyfish in the world whose sting can kill in three minutes. "Just the lightest brush — you don't even feel it — and then, whammo, you're in more pain than you ever could have imagined, and you are struggling to breathe and you can't move your limbs and you can't stop vomiting and your blood pressure just keeps going up and up," says Gershwin. "It is really surprising how many places they occur around the world — places you would never expect: Hawaii, Caribbean, Florida, Wales, New Caledonia, Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines, India ... as well as Australia.""

274 comments

  1. Ethical fishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Time to dust off that recipe for sesame jelly fish with chili sauce.

    1. Re:Ethical fishing by dpilot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know you're making a joke, but it's actually serious. They're busy trying to promote eating Lionfish, another troublesome invasive species. Perhaps not coincidentally, Lionfish can also be dangerous to handle, so part of the promotion is teaching people how to safely handle and prepare them.

      There were several jellyfish recpies, but your sesame jellyfish is the only one with a picture.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    2. Re:Ethical fishing by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      I always read articles about that sort of thing but I can never find them in any market. Why are invasive species not more readily available to purchase?

    3. Re:Ethical fishing by gweilo8888 · · Score: 2

      Was just about to say the same thing, glad to see I'm not alone. Together we can eat our way out of this problem!

    4. Re:Ethical fishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The solution to any invasive species problem is an Asian cookbook. Cold cut roast duck with marinated jellyfish and diced cucumber is freaking amazing.

    5. Re:Ethical fishing by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you, Spongebob and Patrick.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    6. Re:Ethical fishing by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe because Jelly fish tastes like slimy Jello that paralyzes your tong?

    7. Re:Ethical fishing by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      Perhaps not coincidentally, Lionfish can also be dangerous to handle, so part of the promotion is teaching people how to safely handle and prepare them.

      They could market it to the adventurous folks: "Better than fugu: Now twice as dangerous!"

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    8. Re:Ethical fishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What we need to do, is help sea turtles out more, as they are the ones that were eating these jellyfish for centuries before their population took a hit.

    9. Re:Ethical fishing by StoneyMahoney · · Score: 2

      Japan is having a real problem with the jellyfish invasions wiping out the schools of fish they use for food, filling nets with nothing but worthless jellies. Their idea? Top chefs are promoting jellyfish sushi at trade shows. It's been on menus for decades but few customers would order it because of the consistency, so turning around that perception is likely to be important in maintaining their national food supply levels in the future.

      (Disclaimer: this post formed under the influence of powerful cold and flu medication)

    10. Re:Ethical fishing by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about eating jellyfish?
      The GP mentioned lionfish.

    11. Re:Ethical fishing by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      oh... well those just kill you so I guess you're right.

    12. Re:Ethical fishing by dpilot · · Score: 1

      GP was talking about the generic issue of promoting invasive species as tasty and fun to eat. Jellyfish and Lionfish both fit.

      StoneyMahoney mentioned that Japan has been promoting jellyfish sushi for some time, and having problems overcoming texture revulsion. I guess carp have a bad enough name in the US that it's going to be tough trying to save the Great Lakes with the "Yumm, tasty" approach.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    13. Re:Ethical fishing by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Funny

      Too bad there's no use for jellyfish in traditional Chinese medicine. No it's always tiger dicks and rhino horns and elephant tusks and other stuff from endangered species.

      Actually...hey you know I heard that eating about 10lbs of jellyfish per day will totally make your dick huge and hard and give it super-strength, 4 realz. Pass it on! Especially eastward!

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    14. Re:Ethical fishing by Derec01 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I am concerned that's a terrible solution. Largely because if the fish comes into demand, and the cost to farm them drops below the catch and transport cost from where they already are invading, you could just get introductions to new places.

      It would seem to work as long as they are incredibly plentiful, but we certainly haven't eliminated chickens by eating them.

    15. Re:Ethical fishing by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I thought the terminators were going to take of them.

      http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/13/10/04/0334216/

    16. Re:Ethical fishing by war4peace · · Score: 1

      My thong?

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    17. Re:Ethical fishing by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      Huh?
      They are venomous, not poisonous.

      They are indeed edible.

    18. Re:Ethical fishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is serious and besides the fact that Jellyfish are 90% water and taste like nothing the solutions are so simple to fix without lowering our standard of living that I am astonished that none are being consider.

      First off it has to be a technological solution. Green energy, blah, blah, blah, is great but right now there are 16-super-container ships that pollute as much as the 260-million cars on the road every day they sail and they could be modified quickly so as to to green a zero emission fleet - They should perhaps use nuclear powered engines like navy aircraft carriers do and that alone would reduce carbon levels dramatically.

      If this is too Geo-Politically dangerous than perhaps the US Navy or Nuclear powered Navies around the world should control massive international shipping?

      Reference to the pollution levels of massive container ships: http://www.viewzone.com/sixteenships.html
       

    19. Re:Ethical fishing by locopuyo · · Score: 1

      I use a knife to spread my jelly fish.

    20. Re:Ethical fishing by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Maybe because Jelly fish tastes like slimy Jello that paralyzes your tong?

      Tong? Sounds like you are speaking from experience here.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    21. Re:Ethical fishing by spitzak · · Score: 1

      I think you are confusing particulate pollution with carbon dioxide production.

      Container ships put out a huge amount of old-school pollution compared to cars. But for carbon dioxide cars are much more the percentage you might expect.

      I agree that nuclear powered ships would be a great idea for reducing the extreme amount of old-school pollution (and it would get rid of the CO2 emission as well, even though that is minor).

    22. Re:Ethical fishing by psithurism · · Score: 4, Funny

      The stiff parts of gargantuan or viscous animals have always been a target for those who want to gain raging, gargantuan stiff parts themselves, since you are what you eat. The placebo effect is not so strong when you tell a guy, "this small, inert floppy goop-sack will do the trick!"

      I wish your marketing campaign luck anyway.

    23. Re:Ethical fishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The object is not to eliminate the jellyfish (or chickens). The object is to adapt - to make use of a readily available (cheap) resource.

    24. Re:Ethical fishing by bronzemug · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why do we have to eat them..? Can't they be used as livestock feed ?

      --
      [This sig space for sale. Cheap]
    25. Re:Ethical fishing by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Carp are actually quite tastey. The problem is the bones. They have a huge number of very small bones. Probably the best solution would be to can them, like sardines. That way the bones stop being a problem.

      As for jellyfish...I had a jellyfish sushi several years ago. It was pretty good, but so pricey that I haven't had any since. (But that may have been jellyfish eggs.)

      I know nothing about the taste of Lion fish, but I would definitely wan the butcher to have already removed it's skin and external spines. (Unlike Salmon, where I prefer that the skin be on the fish.)

      P.S.: We are warned to avoid "eels boiled in brew" (Lord Randall), so I'm not disappointed that the sole time I tasted canned eels, I didn't like them. OTOH, I don't think that eels are an invasive species.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    26. Re:Ethical fishing by Valdrax · · Score: 3, Funny

      The placebo effect is not so strong when you tell a guy, "this small, inert floppy goop-sack will do the trick!"

      So, then we should try touting increased bust size then?

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    27. Re:Ethical fishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, it extends your life and cures, well anything really.

      Oh, and the dick growing. I mean it's obvious and all, but those jellyfish must be applied directly to the body part, right?

    28. Re:Ethical fishing by Guest316 · · Score: 1

      Japan has a history of blaming everything other than themselves for their shortage of favorite seafood.

      Well, so do most people in general, but Japan relies on (read: overfishes) the ocean quite a bit and makes rather a dramatic fuss when they can't get as much as they want. Basically, yes there's a problem worldwide, but as usual Japan is pointing fingers in the wrong direction for their depleted fish populations.

    29. Re:Ethical fishing by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      Then we can compromise:

      You've already taken care of the stiff vicious part, but don't forget to care for the WHOLE PACKAGE.

      Buy goop-sack. Because a race-car w/o tires is going nowhere.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    30. Re:Ethical fishing by Zynder · · Score: 1
      I love Freudian slips :)

      viscous animals

      this small, inert floppy goop-sack

      Viscious is the word you are looking for. Viscous means thick and gooey maybe like a jellyfish. Good one!

    31. Re:Ethical fishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but then the oceanic plastic shopping bag population will explode!

    32. Re:Ethical fishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it didnt paralyse your tongue, could you imagine how much sauce you would need to make jellyfish palatable?

    33. Re:Ethical fishing by toQDuj · · Score: 1

      Most ports do not allow nuclear-powered ships to moor, so change that first.

      --
      Every experiment which ends in a big bang is a good experiment.
    34. Re:Ethical fishing by sadboyzz · · Score: 1

      There's much more exploitable bullshit in Chinese traditional medicine than just big hard dicks. You just need to find the human organ that most resembles a "small, inert floppy goop-sack", and somehow link that organ to one's sexual prowess (through the theories of Chinese Medicine of course, I'm pretty sure it's in there somewhere). Do that and before you know it we're adding the jelly fish to the endangered list.

    35. Re:Ethical fishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe we can convince women to eat them instead of getting breast implants.

    36. Re:Ethical fishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OTOH, I don't think that eels are an invasive species

      You and I, we watch different kinds of porn.

    37. Re:Ethical fishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time to dust off that recipe for sesame jelly fish with chili sauce. [Setting topic to jellyfish.]

      They're busy trying to promote eating Lionfish, another troublesome invasive species. [...] There were several jellyfish recpies, but your sesame jellyfish is the only one with a picture. [Mentioning lionfish in relation to the topic. Relation pointed out via superset "invasive species". Topic is still jellyfish.]

      Why are invasive species not more readily available to purchase? [Broadening the topic to the superset.]

      because Jelly fish tastes like slimy Jello [Sticking with the original topic as an instance.]

      Who said anything about eating jellyfish? [Elvis leaves the building.]

      Summary: Somebody did, in fact, say something about eating jellyfish. Pretty much right about before you started talking about the superset and complaining that jellyfish hadn't magically vanished from the context.

      A correct response could have been,

      That explains why there is little demand and, as corollary, supply for jellyfish, but doesn't address lionfish. I could try and apply the same rationale to it, but for unspecified reasons will not.

      HTH.

    38. Re:Ethical fishing by spitzak · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah I agree there are a lot of obstacles to nuclear-powered container ships, and most of them are not technical.

    39. Re:Ethical fishing by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      Japan is having problems because of massive overfishing. And when they can't find any close my, they use their long range trawlers to fish in other countries waters. The amount of black market seafood i saw there was crazy. We have even found blue whale (genetically verified.)

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
  2. On the plus side by schneidafunk · · Score: 4, Informative

    Many endangered species, such as sea turtles, eat jellyfish.

    --
    Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:On the plus side by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And if we hadn't overfished turtles(with their incredibly long life cycle), the jellyfish population would likely be in check.

    2. Re:On the plus side by afidel · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The biggest thing we can do to help turtles is to install UV lights on commercial fishing nets to significantly reduce the bycatch rate, turtles can see into the UV spectrum but fish cannot so there is no impact on the fishermen other than a fairly minimal cost for waterproof led housings.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:On the plus side by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The problem is that it takes whole ecosystems to successfully fend off encroaching jellyfish, which is why they're on the rise--the ecosystems are collapsing.

      There are a few creatures that eat jellyfish, but they eat EVERYTHING. Once the ecosystem starts to crumble, jellyfish feed into the loop by eating larvae and fry and eggs and anything available. They're good in anoxic environments, they're not affected by acidification (since they have no hard parts that are vulnerable; the only hard part they have isn't impacted), and they provide low nutritional value back to the ocean despite their intake.

      It's a bit of a miracle that the oceans ever moved past the jellyfish stage at all. They're very old, really adaptable, and very, very good at surviving.

    4. Re:On the plus side by schneidafunk · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's very interesting. However, there is also a big problem with people poaching their eggs.

      --
      Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
    5. Re:On the plus side by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised at just how much competitive benefit a central nervous system provides.

    6. Re:On the plus side by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is there a better way to cook them?

    7. Re:On the plus side by denis-The-menace · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wild salmon, too

      Don't worry, we are making them extinct in about 10 years.
      Please be patient! /s

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    8. Re:On the plus side by SJHillman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Can't we just flip the world over? That way, all of the jellyfish will drain onto the turtles, all the way down.

    9. Re:On the plus side by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 1

      I dunno, doesn't seem to help people being stung by jellyfish. :)

      I think we might be able to engineer our way out of the worst of it, but it's clear that without the benefit of sheer numbers and biomass, jellyfish can wildly out-compete already struggling ecosystems. If we don't want to be eating jellyfish chips for the next 100 years as our main source of seafood, we're really going to have to do better with regards to the ocean.

    10. Re:On the plus side by denis-The-menace · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I read what is REALLY helping them spread are all those floating bits of plastic out there.

      Jellyfish spores need something to cling-to to survive.
      That used to be very hard in the ocean because it's all water.

      But today, thanks to plastic bits floating everywhere in the ocean, this is no longer a problem.

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    11. Re:On the plus side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Say that when a jellyfish is ruling over you! They're coming for us and our central nervous system only makes us more yummy.

    12. Re:On the plus side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a better way to cook them?

      Yes, when you use them to make a baby seal omlette.

    13. Re:On the plus side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I did accidently bite one that got on my scuba regulator. They have no flavor at all - pretty crappy eating at best - and the tentacles hurt your tongue without the fun of a good hot spice. I rate them as about the last thing anyone would like to eat.

    14. Re:On the plus side by BullInChina · · Score: 4, Funny

      Shortest animal in a bar joke ever. So this baby seal walks into this club.

    15. Re:On the plus side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure you could look at a Thai or Cajun cookbook and get some good ideas.

    16. Re:On the plus side by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Informative

      Jellyfish do have a very minimalistic nervous system. It's simple, but it's there. Visible in some species as a ring around the bell, near the edge. Just enough to handle the only two things a jellyfish needs to do: Swim straight (It makes sure the bell contracts in sync, not one side before the other) and handle the task of transferring food from tentacles to stomach.

    17. Re:On the plus side by ScottCooperDotNet · · Score: 1

      They'd all land in the Outback and dry out. What solution is that?

      On the plus side, seafood BBQ.

    18. Re:On the plus side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was predicted in an episode of Captain Planet 22 fucking years ago! Another worthy episode to check out would be the one where this person in a latin community finds a way to clone themselves, leading to an overpopulation problem. When the moral of the episode is explained in plain English at the end of the episode, it is a plea to breed responsibly and have only as many kids as you can properly raise.

      -- Ethanol-fueled

    19. Re:On the plus side by beckett · · Score: 3, Interesting

      we can farm turtles through aquaculture techniques and mitigate directed fishing pressure on sea turtles and wild eggs. this farm has been operating for over 40 years, and can complete the life cycle from hatch to reproductive recruitment.

      "We must plant the sea and herd its animals using the sea as farmers instead of hunters. That is what civilization is all about - farming replacing hunting." - Jacques Yves Cousteau

    20. Re:On the plus side by s.petry · · Score: 1

      I believe this was a joke and mistakenly modded "informative" instead of funny. Giving an endangered species more jellyfish to eat does not fix the pollution and environmental damage that caused them to become endangered to begin with.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    21. Re:On the plus side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vagina jokes are never funny. Period.

    22. Re:On the plus side by catchblue22 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I wrote a summary of research paper 10 years ago for a course I was taking. That paper described what happened in the Black Sea after top level predators were removed. As I remember, the removal of the top level predators made the entire ecosystem unstable. Overfishing of smaller fish opened up a niche for other species like jellyfish, which then displaced for a time the opportunities for the populations of the small fish to recover.

      In essence, this is what is happening worldwide. We are killing off the sharks via the shark fin industry, and sharks are the top level predator in the ocean. We are also overfishing smaller species. This seems to be opening up niches for jellyfish, which may displace the fish that we normally eat. This experiment has already been carried out in the Black Sea, and the results are not good.

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    23. Re:On the plus side by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I don't eat things that poop out of their mouths.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    24. Re:On the plus side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had seen a documentary in the past year or so that had stated jellyfish do well in warming oceans and can even do great in oxygen depleted environments - it was one of the main reasons they dominated the early oceans.

    25. Re:On the plus side by StoneyMahoney · · Score: 2

      The main ecosystem failure causing this has been in the jellyfish spawning grounds themselves. The fish that would normally pork their way through the billions upon billions of jellyfish eggs have been over-fished to the tipping point where the jellyfish population has exploded out of control and overwhelmed all the other species in the region. The clouds of fertilized eggs then wash out into the ocean and the immense blooms form thousands of miles from the spawning grounds where the adults do some porking of their own.

    26. Re:On the plus side by StoneyMahoney · · Score: 1

      It's not much of an edge up against the sheer overwhelming weight of numbers the jellyfish have achieved. There's little any individual can do when billions of jellyfish clean out it's entire ecosystem.

    27. Re:On the plus side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So...what happened to the clones? I find it difficult to imagine Captain Planet killing people.

    28. Re:On the plus side by StoneyMahoney · · Score: 2

      That may be a factor, but as I understand from a documentary I saw a few months ago (is Slashdot temporally displaced or something?) the overfishing of areas where they spawn means their aren't enough fish hoovering up the billions of jellyfish eggs generated per spawning individual and their populations are out of control.

    29. Re:On the plus side by umafuckit · · Score: 3, Informative

      The biggest thing we can do to help turtles is to install UV lights on commercial fishing nets to significantly reduce the bycatch rate, turtles can see into the UV spectrum but fish cannot so there is no impact on the fishermen other than a fairly minimal cost for waterproof led housings.

      Fish do possess UV cones (as do reptiles and birds) -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vision_in_fishes#Ultraviolet. For example, cyprinids, a large family of freshwater fish, have a short-wave sensitivity as short as 277 nm with a peak sensitivity for the short-wave cones of 358 nm (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8782369). Human short-wave cones have a peak at 420 nm and turtle UV cones are at 372 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11925010).

    30. Re:On the plus side by Damastus+the+WizLiz · · Score: 1

      Jelly Gumbo...maybe..

      --
      I often have trouble remembering which way is out of bed in the morning.
    31. Re:On the plus side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, welcome our jellyfish overlords.

    32. Re:On the plus side by FearTheDonut · · Score: 1

      Captain Planet never killed anyone?? Don Cheadle as Captain Planet sure did: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwJaELXadKo

    33. Re:On the plus side by Agares · · Score: 2

      This makes me think of a hilarious repsonse to a pickup line I had heard. Some celebrity mentioned it when I was watching TV, but I can't remember exactly who it was at the moment. Anyways this is how it went, the guy of course walks up to her in the club and says... Guy: I was going to tell you a joke about my penis, but it is way too long. Girl: I was going to tell you a joke about my vagina, but you would never get it.

    34. Re:On the plus side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I read the article, I kept looking for a mention of the obvious point. If the "deer" are multiplying rapidly, doesn't that mean there will be a surge in "wolves" in a year or two?

    35. Re:On the plus side by Ultracrepidarian · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I'll take the egg salad sandwich.

    36. Re:On the plus side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And making more little jellyfishies.

      AC

    37. Re:On the plus side by XcepticZP · · Score: 2

      jellyfishies.

      Did you mean to say jelly babies?

    38. Re:On the plus side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should have checked his ID!

    39. Re:On the plus side by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      The plastic bits also do a good job of killing jellyfish predators, who confuse plastic bags for jellyfish

    40. Re:On the plus side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You voted for obama though, and he's been spewing shit for years. Where exactly is _your_ red line?

    41. Re:On the plus side by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      I don't eat things that poop out of their mouths.

      My friend, until you've eaten owl, you haven't lived.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    42. Re:On the plus side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I noticed the 'freshwater' part of you post. Not the target species then.

    43. Re:On the plus side by Zynder · · Score: 1

      What the fuck is wrong with you people?

    44. Re:On the plus side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like hell, i killed like 20 of them today. you cant tell me that doesnt make a difference

    45. Re:On the plus side by umafuckit · · Score: 1

      Then notice the wikipedia link too: it mentions saltwater fish with UV vision. I just couldn't at short-notice find a link to a primary paper on saltwater fish. UV cones are a common feature in fish, reptiles, and birds. It's us mammals that have restricted colour vision.

    46. Re:On the plus side by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      This experiment has already been carried out in the Black Sea, and the results are not good.

      Except for the jellyfish. For them, their clipboards say Results are excellent!

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    47. Re:On the plus side by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

      This experiment has already been carried out in the Black Sea, and the results are not good.

      Except for the jellyfish. For them, their clipboards say Results are excellent!

      I guess I was being a bit implicit. I meant that the results are not good for us. Meaning that jellyfish are objectively less nutritious for human consumption. And possibly it will be bad for all oxygen consuming life forms as most of our oxygen comes from the ocean, and because shifting to a jellyfish based aquatic ecosystem could have a negative impact on oxygen producing phytoplankton. Admittedly this is speculation on my part, but I don't think it is as outlandish as it might seem to imagine a world with widespread oceanic zones of low oxygen production. In fact we are already observing large "dead-zones" in the ocean.

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    48. Re:On the plus side by qwak23 · · Score: 1

      That video never, ever gets old. It's a shame the sequels suck.

  3. Oh noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Something else for the environment list to get all uppity about. When are they going to realize we live on a dynamic planet!?

    I, for one, welcome our squishy little underlords.

    1. Re:Oh noes! by i+kan+reed · · Score: 2

      Something else for the environment list to get all uppity about. When are they going to realize we live on a dynamic planet!?

      What does this even mean? Do you even know?

    2. Re:Oh noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something else for the environment list to get all uppity about. When are they going to realize we live on a dynamic planet!?

      What does this even mean? Do you even know?

      Yes, it means shit changes. Species go extinct. Other species move in to fill a niche when condition change. That's how life works.
      Preserving the status quo, and attempting to freeze the environment in a particular point in time, is futile and shortsighted.

    3. Re:Oh noes! by i+kan+reed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As long as you don't mind being one of those species. Sure. Guess what: your species depends on its environment to a greater degree than others like cockroaches or jellyfish.

    4. Re:Oh noes! by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      nonsense, humans change the environment to fit them. do you think tens of millions of people could live in the northern half of N. American continent with only their birthday suit?

    5. Re:Oh noes! by StoneyMahoney · · Score: 2

      There's two ways of looking at it.

      1) Humanity does not have the moral right to wipe out other species.

      2) Humanity damages it's long-term survival chances by reducing biosphere diversity.

      Take your pick.

    6. Re:Oh noes! by amicusNYCL · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, it means shit changes. Species go extinct. Other species move in to fill a niche when condition change. That's how life works.
      Preserving the status quo, and attempting to freeze the environment in a particular point in time, is futile and shortsighted.

      Right, so we might as well just take every fish that we possibly can out of the ocean. A fishing net that can hold 14 747s is not big enough, we need larger nets so that we can also mistakenly catch whales, sharks, rays, dolphins, turtles, etc. Because that's how life works, being caught in a gigantic net when you're not even being hunted. We should also speed up production on more boats that can catch 3,000 tons of tuna in a single trip, because the ocean can totally sustain a tuna fleet like that. I mean, who cares if the boat catches and kills tons and tons of other species that they just get rid of, those things shouldn't have been swimming near the tuna, right? Who cares if Japan is allotted 6,000 tons of bluefin tuna to catch in a year (they only need that boat to make 2 trips, then they can relax!), but instead they catch between 12,000 and 20,000 tons? That doesn't affect me! I don't give a shit if my grandchildren ever taste tuna! They'll be happy with their peanut butter and jellyfish sandwiches. This doesn't make me angry because I know that Japan isn't alone in these practices, so I can't blame them. Hell, the Pacific bluefin tuna stocks are down 96%, you know what that means? Yeah, baby, we still have 4% left! Go get it! In the recent catch 90% of the fish were juveniles who had never reproduced. You know what that means? Last generation, fuckers! Get it while you can! We need to get that boat that can catch 3,000 tons at once out there to finish off those cocky fuckers, what with their "waaa, I'm the top of the food chain" bullshit.

      This is exactly the way the world works - people discover fishing, they discover nets, build boats, and entire villages, cities, and countries survive because of the plentiful fish that the ocean provides. Then we build a fishing fleet bigger than the world has ever seen, take everything we possibly can out of the ocean in order to get the high-dollar stuff we're after, leave nothing for the local communities, and they can all go fuck themselves because this a fucking dynamic planet. I'm right there with you, pal.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    7. Re:Oh noes! by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      And sometimes the long-term consequences of those changes make the environment substantially less livable.

    8. Re:Oh noes! by jafac · · Score: 1

      Humanity will not stop.

      Until Nature stops us.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    9. Re:Oh noes! by locopuyo · · Score: 2

      Why don't they just eat cake?

    10. Re:Oh noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't disagree wtih anything you're saying and would in fact like to know more. Are the percentage statistics you site from NOAA? I'd love to be able to dig deeper into this if you can provide a link. Thanks.

    11. Re:Oh noes! by Maelwryth · · Score: 2

      This was on the radio the other day. Basically the guy sailed a yacht race from Melbourne to Osaka ten years ago and lived on fish and rice the whole way. Now he does it and he's calling it a dead ocean.

      --
      I reserve the write to mangle english.
    12. Re:Oh noes! by amicusNYCL · · Score: 2

      Those particular numbers come from a Pew Environment Group report from January:

      http://www.pewenvironment.org/news-room/other-resources/new-scientific-report-shows-pacific-bluefin-tuna-population-down-964-percent-85899441247

      Complete with various articles discussing it:

      http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/jan/09/overfishing-pacific-bluefin-tuna
      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/10/pacific-bluefin-tuna-overfishing_n_2448967.html

      Here's a page designed by someone who misses Geocities that talks about the Atlantic stocks which includes several graphs showing the decline since the 60s and 70s:

      http://www.bigmarinefish.com/bluefin.html

      I would highly recommend that you watch the documentary End Of The Line. The data that they show and the conclusions that they reach are pretty difficult to argue against. The world and its oceans look like a massive, massive place that we cannot possibly influence. But, as they say in the movie, we are fighting a war against fish, and we are winning. If we keep doing what we're doing then there will in fact come a day when we won't have any more fish to eat. The scary thing is that it looks like that day is coming really soon. Things like the jellyfish swarms should be a red alert alarm that we have a major problem on our hands, but there are always going to be people who look at those concerned with the low levels of fish in the ocean and write those peoples and their opinions off as some sort of environmental fanaticism. Unfortunately, this is reality.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    13. Re:Oh noes! by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Actually, most desertification is entirely natural: the Sahara desert was once moist, green and dense with vegatation, as was the Antarctic, as was Greenland which isn't so green these days.

    14. Re:Oh noes! by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Thanks, that looks interesting. If countries like Japan, China, the US, Peru, Spain, etc don't get serious about protecting fish stocks, our oceans are screwed.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    15. Re:Oh noes! by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      ^ The libertarian approach to the environment.

  4. Well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stay out of the ocean. Don't swim in the food chain.

  5. 50 years in the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slashdot headline 50 years from now:

    "Scientists Says Turtles Are Taking Over the Oceans"

    (The typo is intentional, because even in 50 years, /. will still lack quality control.)

    1. Re:50 years in the future by camperdave · · Score: 2

      Maybe in 50 years there will be a magazine named "Scientists", and your headline will make perfect sense.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    2. Re:50 years in the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many dupes will there have been by that point?

    3. Re:50 years in the future by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Maybe in 50 years there will be a magazine

      Nope.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:50 years in the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooh, talking magazines! I hope I live to 80 to see it.

  6. Never expect by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Funny

    "It is really surprising how many places they occur around the world — places you would never expect: Hawaii, Caribbean, Florida, Wales, New Caledonia, Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines, India ... as well as Australia.""

    No, places I would never expect would be Kansas, Siberia and the middle of the Sahara. If cable television has taught me anything, it's that the sea is out to kill me. If I can smell saltwater in the air, I'm expecting some explosion of deadliness.

    1. Re:Never expect by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Funny

      In/Around Australia I would expect the jellyfish to be 10 meters across and armed with giant fangs. Everything there seems to be there solely to ruin your day.

    2. Re:Never expect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not wrong. They have the box jellyfish, a species that actually hunts its prey rather than just drifting around hoping for something.

    3. Re:Never expect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kansas, Siberia and the middle of the Sahara

      Soon: JELLYNADO

    4. Re:Never expect by bobbied · · Score: 1

      COOL! I'll bring the bread and you bring the Peanut butter OK?

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    5. Re:Never expect by camperdave · · Score: 5, Funny

      Everything there seems to be there solely to ruin your day.

      Sounds like an excellent place to put a penal colony.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    6. Re:Never expect by strength_of_10_men · · Score: 1

      No, places I would never expect would be Kansas, Siberia and the middle of the Sahara.

      Suddenly, jellyfish EVERYWHERE

      C. sowerbii has a global distribution - it has been found in countries on almost every continent and nearly every state in America

    7. Re:Never expect by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      The big obstacle to a Jellynado movie is finding a way to make the hero survive without having to buy the rights to Optimus Prime, Batman and Godzilla.

    8. Re:Never expect by beckett · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, places I would never expect would be Kansas, Siberia and the middle of the Sahara. If cable television has taught me anything, it's that the sea is out to kill me. If I can smell saltwater in the air, I'm expecting some explosion of deadliness.

      who says they have to be marine only? bioinvasive, freshwater jellies have been found:

      Hamilton County
      Erie County, Ohio
      Trenton, Ontario
      Hoosier county (aka Laporte), Indiana

    9. Re:Never expect by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Is this close enough?

      "One kind of jellyfish, which might be termed the zombie jelly, is quite literally immortal. When Turritopsis dohrnii “dies” it begins to disintegrate, which is pretty much what you expect from a corpse. But then something strange happens. A number of cells escape the rotting body. These cells somehow find each other, and reaggregate to form a polyp. All of this happens within five days of the jellyfish’s “death,” and weirdly, it’s the norm for the species."

      or this?

      "One of the fastest breeders of all is Mnemiopsis. Biologists characterize it as a “self-fertilizing simultaneous hermaphrodite,” which means that it doesn’t need a partner to reproduce, nor does it need to switch from one sex to the other, but can be both sexes at once. It begins laying eggs when just thirteen days old, and is soon laying 10,000 per day. Even cutting these prolific breeders into pieces doesn’t slow them down. If quartered, the bits will regenerate and resume normal life as whole adults in two to three days."

      http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2013/sep/26/jellyfish-theyre-taking-over/?page=2

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    10. Re:Never expect by Rhywden · · Score: 1

      Except for some/i> of the sheep.

    11. Re:Never expect by korgitser · · Score: 1

      How 'bout some bay area blues?

      If I can smell saltwater in the air, I'm expecting some explosion of deadlines.

      FTFY

      --
      FCKGW 09F9 42
    12. Re:Never expect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The original script for Pitch Black was set in Australia, but the studio executives thought it made Vin Diesel escaping from the monsters seem too implausible.

  7. Question by VernonNemitz · · Score: 2

    Does anyone know how vulnerable dolphins are to jellyfish stings? They don't have a layer of protective scales like fish, and there is a long-standing mystery regarding dolphin beachings.

  8. Editing please by ComfortablyAmbiguous · · Score: 1

    Scientists say, or Scientist says - please not Scientists says

    1. Re:Editing please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just that they're MANY Scientists and they can't say it enough!

    2. Re:Editing please by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      "Scientists" is clearly the name of a publication of some sort.

  9. Getting them out of the way... by pscottdv · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new jellyfish overlords.

    I Soviet Russia, jellyfish sting you! wait.. that one doesn't work.

    and of course:

    frist post! posted from my raspberry pi.

    --

    this signature has been removed due to a DMCA takedown notice

    1. Re:Getting them out of the way... by scuzzlebutt · · Score: 1

      You win Slashdot.

      --
      In C++, your friends can see your privates.
    2. Re:Getting them out of the way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he wins slashdot if he says something new and original. Alas no /. poster can do this, instead we are doomed to repeat the same shitty phases over and over again until the end of time.

      HOT GRITS!

    3. Re:Getting them out of the way... by StoneyMahoney · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, jellyfish piss on you!

    4. Re:Getting them out of the way... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      In Korea, only old jellyfish sting.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  10. EVERYBODY PANIC ....slowly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those jellyfish are coming right at us!

  11. Chironex fleckeri by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Capital letter for genus, lower case for species. Like Homo sapiens. Not "Homo Sapiens" or "homo sapiens". The two parts of a species name should also be italicized (i.e. Chironex fleckeri). Although it's a little technical, it's not a hard rule to remember when using species names.

  12. Re:Most likely on the rise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess that's what passes for scientific evidence these days in this era of environmental activism masquerading as science: "Eh, probably, maybe..."

    So, in your universe, science is something that always gives 100% certain answers?

  13. Obviously need to over-fish jellyfish as well then by Aguazul2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can't we find a use for them? As soon as capitalism gets to work on them, they'll be goners too.

  14. Let's hear it from... by benjfowler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let's hear it from greedy fisherman and their right-wing supporters, who think it's humanity's God-given right to rape the oceans and trash the food chain upon which everything depends... human greed will do us in for sure, because it overrides even the survival instinct.

    1. Re:Let's hear it from... by eneville · · Score: 1

      It's not the fishermen who are greedy, it's the company that they work for which is. The fisherman just wants a comfortable life, they're quiet hard working people, taking risks on a daily basis. How often does your job threaten you with drowning when you screw up? However, I have no sympathy for the company which they work for, since that would be the accountants realm. Business is the one area of the world where altruism doesn't apply. So lets not try to confuse the fishermen with capitalism.

    2. Re:Let's hear it from... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A dumber sentiment has rarely been uttered.

    3. Re:Let's hear it from... by StoneyMahoney · · Score: 1

      We can either look at it from a moral perspective or from a selfish survival perspective. I prefer the latter - reduction of biodiversity in the ecosphere reduces humanity's long term continuation chances.

    4. Re:Let's hear it from... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's hear it from greedy fisherman and their right-wing supporters, who think it's humanity's God-given right to rape the oceans and trash the food chain upon which everything depends... human greed will do us in for sure, because it overrides even the survival instinct.

      Just finished reading Jared Diamond's "Collapse: How Societies Choose to Succeed or Fail". That has often been the case in human history.

    5. Re:Let's hear it from... by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      Sssssh! Studying silly environmental issues like "breeding habits of jellyfish" make great rightwing blogosphere headlines about government waste. After all, if it's not a farm subsidy or a bigger gun, why should taxpayers be funding it?

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    6. Re:Let's hear it from... by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Like it's not the poachers fault that rhinos are going extinct, just the people that buy their horns?

    7. Re:Let's hear it from... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, let's not. Fisherman work hard for very little, so that pampered, whiny-ass bitches like you can consume the hell out of the planet. Let's hear it for arrogant, pompous dumb-asses that pay people to rape the oceans for them and trash the food chain with all of their synthetic garbage.

      Human greed is not the problem, you stupid, wet-eared fuck-tards. YOU, your existence, your mouth...human overpopulation is the problem.

    8. Re:Let's hear it from... by BenfromMO · · Score: 1
      Yes because its the right-wing people who eat fish and go fishing in general while people on the left-wing never eat fish and never go fishing at all. Guess as long as you are insulting the correct half of the country you get moderated "insightful" around here when you use such thoughts as "people on the right stick their sex organs into the ocean without getting consent..." Those evil bastards, no means no! The oceans told me so.

      Or this concept that only people on the right trash the planet or are responsible for pollution when its normally those celebrities like Al Gore who have carbon budgets 1000 times more than normal people...

      Oh how much fun this is?! Lets explore this concept that nature survival instinct has anything to do with being "not greedy." Yea, good luck finding even one wild animal that does not have this survival instinct to kill everything it can kill competition wise while it will eat itself into starvation mode by eating everything it can see...but somehow our greed which is the definition of instinctual behavior in animals....no that could not be natural when every single species on this planet survives by being greedy, by wasting large amounts of food and taking the choice bits and leaving the rest to rot...No, not only do you use rather poor diction, but your entire premise here betrays a terrible misunderstanding of how nature really works and how in your own words, its the half of the country who you disagree with which is at fault, while the left is completely safe especially Al Gore who right now is probably pooping in his personal jet and dumping it over your head.

    9. Re:Let's hear it from... by cusco · · Score: 1

      they're quiet hard working people

      Don't know where you've been, but everywhere that I've traveled professional fishermen are loud, obnoxious drunks any time they're onshore. Fun to party with, but quiet? Not hardly!

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    10. Re: Let's hear it from... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the guards who are evil, it's the government that made the death camp. The guards are just trying to feed their families.

    11. Re:Let's hear it from... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course. Just as it isn't the murderer that's evil, but rather the society that let the murderer be born in the first place. Don't confuse your thought process with intelligence. It's anything but.

    12. Re:Let's hear it from... by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      And "how nature works" apparently includes eradicating species that cause trouble for the rest of the biosphere - like Homo sapiens, for example.

  15. Scientist says, or scientists say by rossdee · · Score: 1

    that grammar nazis should take over slashdot

    Anyway once the jellyfish have eaten all the fish in the area, what do they live on?

    1. Re:Scientist says, or scientists say by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Other jellyfish, I assume.

    2. Re:Scientist says, or scientists say by just_a_monkey · · Score: 1

      People!

      --
      How inappropriate to call this planet Earth, when clearly it is Ocean.
  16. "Visible from space" by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've seen Google Maps. My car is "visible from space."

    1. Re:"Visible from space" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I watched Enemy of the State. Your watch is "visible from space," they can even tell you if the time is off.

    2. Re:"Visible from space" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, you're car is visible to aerial photography. You need to zoom out a few levels to see the satellite imagery where you're car is just a few pixels. Of course, this discounts spy satellites to which we don't have access to the imagery from.

    3. Re:"Visible from space" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, this discounts spy satellites to which we don't have access to the imagery from.

      This is the sort of bloody nonsense up with which I will not put.

    4. Re:"Visible from space" by oodaloop · · Score: 2

      Not really. Google Maps' imagery is taken from planes. Your car would be a blur on even the best spy satellite (IAA Intelligence Analyst).

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    5. Re:"Visible from space" by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I thought a lot of google map "satellite" views were from aerial photography, not satellites.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    6. Re:"Visible from space" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ISS orbits at 370 km (230 miles). Most people agree that it counts as "from space."

      20/20 eyesight corresponds to 1 pixel per arc-minute.
      370 km * tan(1/60) = about 110m (about 120 yards).

      No dimension of your car is more than 100m, so there's no chance of "seeing" your car from the ISS without a telephoto lens.

    7. Re:"Visible from space" by smaddox · · Score: 1

      I know this is true of Hubble class telescopes, but is there still nothing better? It's been over 20 years, and mirror making has come a long way. We are now capable of making 8.4 meter aspheric mirrors with warping and temperature control, and probably a lot more I don't know about. Given, putting one of those in space would be an ordeal, but I'd be surprised if the US didn't have any spy satellites better than Hubble class.

    8. Re: "Visible from space" by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      No, that's where we stand. We have plenty of airborne assets, like the Predator and such. It seems that's where the focus has been for a while. Spy satellites are multi billion dollar platforms, with years of development and serious limitations.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    9. Re:"Visible from space" by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      If we pointed Hubble down to earth, what resolution would we get?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    10. Re:"Visible from space" by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I can't post a link because it's blocked here at work, but xkcd had a "what if?" about precisely that. You should be able to Google it easily.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    11. Re:"Visible from space" by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Thanks, found it.

      A car is certainly larger than the hypothetical table in this xkcd what-if. A Hubble-like telescope specifically built for earth surface (in other words, a spy satellite) could therefore definitely see a car from space. And as more than just a few pixels.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  17. Re:Most likely on the rise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just surprised they didn't find a way to blame nuclear energy too.

    That will be when they find Jellyzilla. Searches are currently active in Tokyo Bay.

  18. On the down side, they're endangered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Those endangered species are endangered because we're killing them, not merely because they don't have enough jellyfish.

  19. Tinfoil Hat Time by DarthVain · · Score: 2

    Funny enough:

    http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/11/07/10/0234250/millions-of-jellyfish-invade-nuclear-reactors

    http://news.slashdot.org/story/13/10/01/2123254/new-threat-to-seaside-nuclear-plants-datacenters-jellyfish

    They don't need to blame nuclear energy, they are working in concert with the jellyfish to shut them down.

    Next in the nuclear arms race will be some sort of aquatic animal with lasers attached to their heads clean out the jellyfish infestations.

    1. Re:Tinfoil Hat Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Life finds a way.

    2. Re:Tinfoil Hat Time by pr0fessor · · Score: 1
  20. The Conconquer Cockroach by deodiaus2 · · Score: 1

    As many species are going extinct, the "common cockroach" is flourishing and multiplying.

  21. I have noticed this locally in Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I often go crabbing up the indian arm in Vancouver - during summer the last 3 years i've noticed a ridiculous amount of jellyfish.. you literally cannot look anywhere in the water and not see jellyfish... pulling a crab trap up through the water column sees you cutting through like 100 of them.

  22. Re:Most likely on the rise? by houstonbofh · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I guess that's what passes for scientific evidence these days in this era of environmental activism masquerading as science: "Eh, probably, maybe..."

    So, in your universe, science is something that always gives 100% certain answers?

    So in your world, gravity works, "mostly sometimes" but not 100%?

  23. Re:must be first post by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

    jellyfish - I hate jellyfish!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dL3ZIc5IL2w

  24. visible from space by tverbeek · · Score: 1

    "it was even visible from space"

    My house is "visible from space": it's right there on Google Maps. This phrase is meaningless, because it's almost entirely a function of weather, the camera being used, and whether something is covered.

    (On the other hand, it's often parroted that the Great Wall of China is "the only man-made object visible from space" ... but even one of China's own astronauts admitted that he couldn't pick it out from Low Earth Orbit.)

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:visible from space by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Also depends if you consider an entire city as one object. Plenty of those are visible.

    2. Re:visible from space by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      Google maps uses images from aircraft, not spacecraft.
      But yes, the quality of the optics matters. A spacecraft with a big telescope, like a spy satellite, will have a much easier time seeing things on the ground than an astronaut with only eyes.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    3. Re:visible from space by Anonyme+Connard · · Score: 1

      Do you know that Google Maps is not made of satellite images only?
      Your house is visible on aerial photographies. This is not what is usually refered to as "visible from space".

    4. Re:visible from space by geekoid · · Score: 2

      explain to be how the plane isn't occupying a space...

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:visible from space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why would a chinese astronaut be able to distinguish the great wall better than anyone else from a perspective from which few have ever seen it?

      i'm pretty sure the visible from space thing is used to describe viewing it without telescopic lenses. otherwise it would clearly have no meaning to anyone with a brain, so why are people nitpicking it?

    6. Re:visible from space by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      My house is "visible from space"

      That's nothing, the guy 2 posts above you says his car is visible from space. So you must either live in a small house, or that guy drives a huge car.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    7. Re:visible from space by Valdrax · · Score: 2

      My house is "visible from space": it's right there on Google Maps. This phrase is meaningless, because it's almost entirely a function of weather, the camera being used, and whether something is covered.

      The phrase "visible from space" is generally considered short-hand for "visible from space with the naked eye." An unobstructed view is also assumed, because it would be pointless to consider the alternative, and normal vision can also be assumed for similar reasons. The only real variable that matters that isn't often explained is just how high up you are.

      It seems that a 1000 mile long mass could qualify if it was wide enough. It's impossible to say just from the length, though, without the width of the mass and the height of the observer.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  25. There's a simple solution to poaching by MikeRT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Put the territory under some sort of corporate or government control and let the employees in charge of the territory use deadly force to stop the poachers. Works quite well in Africa where their game reserve rangers can put a .308 through you quite legally if they catch you hunting endangered species.

    1. Re:There's a simple solution to poaching by smaddox · · Score: 1

      What could possibly go wrong?!

    2. Re:There's a simple solution to poaching by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Somalia?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    3. Re:There's a simple solution to poaching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sounds more like Texas to me, and it works quite well there too...

    4. Re:There's a simple solution to poaching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To me? Absolutely nothing. It's just black on black crime.

    5. Re:There's a simple solution to poaching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What could possibly go wrong?!

      1. Arm and pay local poor peoples with instruction to poach in the reserve.
      2. Sell legal exotic man hunt to tourist.
      3. Profit.
      4. Notice the absence of a '???' step.

    6. Re:There's a simple solution to poaching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it works so well, why do they still have jobs? and why are the species still endangered?

    7. Re:There's a simple solution to poaching by XcepticZP · · Score: 1

      Yes, of course... And when it becomes inconvenient to take care of them anymore, we discard them. Let's face it, people only care because they don't want to be the ones that let an entire species die out under their watch. Once they become a nuisance, then everyone suddenly changes their moral opinions on the matter of killing animals.

      Sometimes force and regulation is not the answer, so here's an alternative. How about farming them to make poaching too costly.

    8. Re:There's a simple solution to poaching by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Put the territory under some sort of corporate or government control and let the employees in charge of the territory use deadly force to stop the poachers. Works quite well in Africa where their game reserve rangers can put a .308 through you quite legally if they catch you hunting endangered species.

      And if you're the father of a family that's dying of malnutrition or disease, and a single elephant tusk could feed your family for the next 30 years? It's not just greed motivating poachers, but desperation. You need the carrot of bringing people out of poverty to go along with that .308 stick.

    9. Re:There's a simple solution to poaching by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Works quite well in Africa where their game reserve rangers can put a .308 through you quite legally if they catch you hunting endangered species.

      I'm not against it, but it still isn't working.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:There's a simple solution to poaching by MildlyTangy · · Score: 1

      OK for corporations to murder ( sorry, kill) people? By shooting them to death? You *must* be an American...

    11. Re:There's a simple solution to poaching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because adjudicated deadly force should be used to prevent poaching.

    12. Re:There's a simple solution to poaching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because adjudicated deadly force should be used to prevent poaching.

      *unadjudicated

  26. I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...welcome our new gelatinous overlords.

  27. turning lemons into "lemonade" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any hotties need me to pee on their jellyfish stings?

  28. Easy to solve by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    Give a more profitable use to jellyfish (even if it is for making glow-in-the-dark ice cream, or other uses) better than "normal" fishes and the balance could be reached again... before is too late.

    1. Re:Easy to solve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Fishes?

    2. Re:Easy to solve by WillgasM · · Score: 1

      is correct when referring to multiple species.

  29. Energy Dept Launches Alternative Fuel Station App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As part of the Obama Administration's commitment to expand access to data and give consumers more transportation options that save money at the pump, the Energy Department today launched a new mobile app to help drivers find stations that provide alternative fuel for vehicles.

  30. Oh? by sanjacguy · · Score: 1

    I, for one, WELCOME our new invertebrate overlords.

    Go Pods!

  31. Re:Most likely on the rise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And of course it follows that if these populations are on the rise (and they MAYBE are, probably) then it's the fault of all the environmentalists' usual suspects.

    Those environmentalists are a bunch of nutjobs.

    It is obvious that this increase in jellyfish is a sign of the imminent awakening of great Cthulhu.

  32. Remember Soylent Green by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't trust any government claiming we have a new ocean food source.

  33. Re:Most likely on the rise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my universe, scientists studying gravity still aren't completely sure how it works. I would expect the same to be true of jellyfish -- especially since we've had far less time to study them than we have had to study gravity.

    The OP suggested, because Gershwin expressed uncertainty about his conclusion, that research on jellyfish populations must be pseudoscientific. That's total bullcrap.

  34. What can be done? by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    There are some countries that will not never stop over-fishing. I cannot imaging that carbon emissions will go down anytime soon.

  35. Re:Most likely on the rise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Her conclusion.

  36. it's EXXXTREEEEEEMEEE!! by Thud457 · · Score: 2
    New Doritos Locos Jazzin' Jellyfish tacos!

    Fugu me.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  37. Pixar quote... by bobbied · · Score: 1

    Dory: [sees a very small baby jellyfish] I shall call him Squishy and he shall be mine and he shall be my Squishy Come on, Squishy Come on, little Squishy...

    [makes baby talk and slowly touches the jellyfish, getting shocked]

    Dory: [pulling her fin away quickly] Ow! Bad squishy, bad squishy!

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  38. Plankton die off by jmichaelg · · Score: 1

    Restore the plankton and you've restored the bottom of the food chain.

    The plankton have died off by at least 40% over the past 60 years. John Martin at the Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute hypothesized in the early 90's that the die-off was due to diminishing iron in the ocean surface waters. He was quoted as saying "Give me a freighter full of iron fertilizer and I'll give you an ice age." meaning that spraying iron onto the ocean's surface would re-populate the plankton and they in turn would consume the excess CO2 that's currently acidifying the oceans.

    In 2002, MBARI validated his hypothesis that spraying iron fertilizer would engender a plankton bloom. Subsequent studies have replicated MBARI's results.

    Seems to me that if someone were to claim a 100 square mile chunk of ocean, they could fertilize it, seed it with anchovies and start a very profitable aqua farm. They would be harvesting a variety of predator fish such as bass and tuna once they discovered the anchovies feasting on the plankton. Since the farm wouldn't harvest all of the carbon the plankton consumed, it'd be a net carbon sink.

    1. Re:Plankton die off by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      How much CO2 gets released as part of the fertilizer production? How fast can the anchovies (and the bass, and the tuna) swim away from your 100 square mile chunk of ocean? How do you know the jellyfish wouldn't just eat all the anchovies before the bass and tuna had a chance?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Plankton die off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As usually all the "sky is falling" crowd can do is run in circles looking for a place to hide.

      Do you believe there is no possible solution to climate change other than imprisoning, killing, or otherwise oppressing human beings and forcing them back to the stoneage?

    3. Re:Plankton die off by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Hey look everybody, this dumbass troll AC thinks asking questions is equivalent to rejecting the idea.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  39. Revenge by Mollusca... by dtjohnson · · Score: 1

    Humans (and other vertebratans) have been feeding on mollusca denizens for centuries...and they are getting pissed off about it. Snails, clams, octopus, squid, abalone, and geoducks...we've had our fill and then some. Not to mention the unspeakable things humans routinely do to slugs. Molluscans have had enough of our abuse and they are coming after us.

    1. Re:Revenge by Mollusca... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...squid ... have had enough of our abuse and they are coming after us.

      I, for one, welcome the impending inkvasion.

    2. Re:Revenge by Mollusca... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jellyfish are Cnidaria, not Mollusca.

      There are certain Mollusca (certain sea slugs) that eat and steal the cnidocysts (stinging cells) from cnidarians and then use them to produce stinging tentacles of their own, somehow without triggering the cnidocysts. Presumably these pirate molluscs are happy about the increased food.

  40. Energy source? by J-1000 · · Score: 1

    Jellyfish-powered cars?

  41. Re:Most likely on the rise? by geekoid · · Score: 1

    You don't understand science do you?
    Which is fine, just shut you yap about it and stay out of politics.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  42. never say never, ever by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Oh overuse of any limited resource will surely stop. One way or another.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:never say never, ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are some countries that will not never stop over-fishing.

      Oh overuse of any limited resource will surely stop. One way or another.

      So you both agree.

  43. On the good side, though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SyFy now has a new milkcow: Great White JellyShark!

    Man-o-warriors?

    Ray stingers?

    Bobbers... OF DEATH!?

    1. Re:On the good side, though... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      SyFy now has a new milkcow: Great White JellyShark!

      Man-o-warriors?

      Ray stingers?

      Bobbers... OF DEATH!?

      Well, there is the third SyFy movie set in Seattle in the #Sharknado series ...

      And we do have the world's largest jellyfish here.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  44. we did by rewindustry · · Score: 2

    it's jellyfish all the way up, now.

  45. Re:Obviously need to over-fish jellyfish as well t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not this again... capitalism has created this problem and the solution to jellyfish (by capitalism) is a swimming pool. It doesn't fucking work because there isn't anything inherent in capitalism that stops shit like this from happening or even makes it try to repair the damages.

  46. global jellyfish apocalypse denialists: by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    I just went to the beach yesterday. I didn't see any jellyfish.

    This is just a natural predator-prey cycle. Mankind has no impact on this.

    Whaddaya mean Orange Ruffy is $1,437 / lb?!!! That's an outrage!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  47. A funny posting by a guy from Australia by Marrow · · Score: 4, Funny

    In my country, terawatt globes are reserved for police helicopter chases and warning sailors of hazardous shoals. This is despite the fact that practically every living creature there can kill you in under three minutes. Our primary spoken language is screaming.
    http://www.27bslash6.com/halogen.html

  48. Re:Obviously need to over-fish jellyfish as well t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not this again... capitalism has created this problem and the solution to jellyfish (by capitalism) is a swimming pool. It doesn't fucking work because there isn't anything inherent in capitalism that stops shit like this from happening or even makes it try to repair the damages.

    If we ever try capitalism again, it will be possible to file a class action lawsuit against the corporations who incurred the damages. Shielding them from liability like we do now is corporate fascism, not capitalism.

  49. Delicacy by Zamphatta · · Score: 1

    Jellyfish is a delicacy in China. Maybe if the seafood restaurants around the world can start promoting jellyfish as a Chinese delicacy, we balance the seas out again.

    1. Re:Delicacy by careysub · · Score: 1

      Seems like everything is a delicacy somewhere in China...

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  50. Jellyfish by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    "reports at CNN that a combination ofoverfishing, warming water, low oxygen and pollution are creating perfect conditions for jellyfish to multiply. "The jellyfish seem to be the ones that are flourishing in this while everything else suffers

    Well, now that the election is over, CNN needs something to impartially report on besides its week-long hammering on the discrepancies between rich and poor.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  51. So basically ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    ... we need to learn how to eat them.

    1. Re:So basically ... by slew · · Score: 1

      ... we need to learn how to eat them.

      You eat the jelly fish, I'll eat the giant crabs...

  52. Perception is everything... by slew · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Lobster used to be prisoner food, until someone got the bright idea to use the newly available railroad to sell canned lobster to inland dwellers who didn't know better and considered all seafood a delicacy.

    Foie gras used to simply be a kosher source of cooking fat (since lard isn't kosher). It wasn't until the French gourmands elevated it to a delicacy.

    1. Re:Perception is everything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lobster used to be prisoner food, until someone got the bright idea to use the newly available railroad to sell canned lobster to inland dwellers who didn't know better and considered all seafood a delicacy.

      Well, I agree with this guy, so I don't even care to check if you're right.

      Foie gras used to simply be a kosher source of cooking fat (since lard isn't kosher). It wasn't until the French gourmands elevated it to a delicacy.

      Citation needed. Ancient Egyptians made foie gras too (or effectively the same thing). They were worried about it being kosher?

    2. Re:Perception is everything... by slew · · Score: 1

      Foie gras used to simply be a kosher source of cooking fat (since lard isn't kosher). It wasn't until the French gourmands elevated it to a delicacy.

      Citation needed. Ancient Egyptians made foie gras too (or effectively the same thing). They were worried about it being kosher?

      The practice of fattening geese became nearly extinct during the dark ages except for the fact the Jews kept the practice alive.

      http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB121207726422829649

    3. Re:Perception is everything... by Zynder · · Score: 0

      REALLY? You citation needed guys will throw that out over anything won't you? I don't even know what the hell you people are talking about but this thing just caught my attention. It pisses me off. Oh and to steal your thunder, I already realize I'll get at least 2 AC's responding with a [citation needed] and they'll all get modded funny. HAHA, good for you.

    4. Re:Perception is everything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, I've eaten fried jellyfish at a Beijing-style restaurant. I am sad to inform you it tastes exactly like what you would expect fried jellyfist to taste like. So I'd suggest another option is required, such as saving the sea turtles.

    5. Re:Perception is everything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [chill pill needed]

  53. Obvious Solution! by StefanJ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Build ships which vaccuum up jellyfish, puree them, and use the proteins as feed stock for 3D printing of food. The stingers can get filtered out, or just left into the low-grade product used in prisons and orphanages.

    I'm sure that Red Lobster can come up with some clever marketing term for this stuff. After the actual lobsters, cod, and king crabs die off they'll have plenty of motivation.

    Interesting Geek-culture historical note: In the 1973 movie "Soylent Green," the titular product is supposed to be made from krill scooped from the oceans. The underlying horror of the movie isn't that the crackers are made of dead people, but that the ocean ecosystem has collapsed due to pollution. The movie also has Edward G. Robinson bitching about how the greenhouse effect has made it hot and damp year-round.

    1. Re:Obvious Solution! by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      And they admit you to the death chamber via orange iPads with rounded rectangle designs...

  54. Places you would never expect! by DeanCubed · · Score: 1

    Hawaii, The Carribean, Florida, Nevada, Alberta, The Congo, The White House, On A Plane, In Your Fridge...

    --
    Born to Play
    1. Re:Places you would never expect! by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Places you would never expect!

      The Spanish Inquisition!

  55. Re:Most likely on the rise? by mythosaz · · Score: 1

    In my universe, scientists studying gravity still aren't completely sure how it works.

    No, we're pretty good on the HOW.

    It's the WHY we're working on.

  56. Re:Most likely on the rise? by TWiTfan · · Score: 0

    You don't understand science do you?

    This isn't science. Its activism that cloaks itself as science.

    Which is fine, just shut you yap about it and stay out of politics.

    Ironic charge coming from a political activist.

    --
    The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
  57. Burn them by rasmusbr · · Score: 2

    What about feeding people indirectly y first feeding the jellyfish to some animal that humans eat? Could jellyfish be made into feed for salmon or other fish farm fish species and if so, what effect would that have on the nutritional contents of the farmed fish?

  58. Re:Obviously need to over-fish jellyfish as well t by rasmusbr · · Score: 1

    Well, here in Sweedeen wee like to burn things for elektricity and heet...

    Maybe you can send us some of your jellyfish? Preferably dried. Uh, and don't ask me how you'll dry thousands of tonnes of jellyfish in a reasonably environmentally sound manner.

  59. Re:Obviously need to over-fish jellyfish as well t by rasmusbr · · Score: 1

    Oh and it might be possible to turn wet jellyfish into methane, which is a good vehicle fuel.

  60. About time by TheCarp · · Score: 1

    Lets see.... I haven't worked there in almost 2 years, so the buddy i was working with was almost 4 years, and it was a year or two between then and when we were going out drinking after work so....

    Yah it was about 6 years ago, heading back and forth between work and the bar.... which happens to be in a marina our building was 1 street back from the docks).... we were walking by, looking down and saying...

    "Fuck that is a lot of jellyfish"
    "More than I ever seen, its like they are .... taking over the ocean"

    I mean, I know we were looking at a vanishingly small sample but.... if other areas looked like the harbor here did then.... taking over is no understatement.

    --
    "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
  61. Politics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! A brainless, lump of jelly ruling Australia... Who'da thunk?!

    I for one welcome our jelly-based overlords.. We might get some actually useful policies for once!

  62. Oblig Simpsons referenc by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our Jellyfish overlords.

  63. Oh please, get real by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I mean, if jellyfish were planning to take over the world, they'd have the largest ones in the world in Puget Sound, where the Pacific Ocean is right next to Seattle ...

    Oh.

    Wait.

    And we'd be bioengineering jellyfish genes into other DNA sequences here at the UW.

    Um. ...

    I for one welcome our Jellyfish Overlords!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  64. Re:Most likely on the rise? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    Gravity seems to not be working as expected on large distances. We call that "dark energy". We have no clue what it is, and therefore cannot really predict what it will do in the future. All we know for sure is that our previous predictions (without dark energy) were wrong.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  65. mmmmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Peanut Butter and Jellyfish on toast. Mmm Mmmm good.

  66. Human overpopulation is the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can trace just about everything back to human overpopulation. It's why we need to develop long term sustainable artificial living environments for extended travel in deep space and perhaps ultimately terraforming technologies. There are other options as well such as voluntary consciousness uploads into electronic environments concurrent with organic body destruction. A peaceful "soft deflation" using various incentives is also an option though not nearly as exciting for the imagination as the more high-tech stuff. It's all science fiction right now but well within the realm of human achievement provided we can avoid the dystopia route. If I were placing bets though I'd say the latter is more probable.

  67. Wales??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "places you would never expect: Hawaii, Caribbean, Florida, Wales, New Caledonia, Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines, India ... as well as Australia."
    chironex flecker have not been detected in Wales

  68. I for one--- by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    dammit, too late

  69. Re:Obviously need to over-fish jellyfish as well t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've heard that applying the non-poisonous parts of jellyfish to your face reduces wrinkles and reverse the effects of skin aging.

  70. I've been saying it for years by mrxak · · Score: 1

    I've been saying it for years, but nobody will listen! Jellyfish aren't from this planet at all, they're intelligent aliens creating global warming to xenoform our planet to better serve their purposes!

    Why won't anybody believe me?!?

  71. Blue bottle sting by MrKaos · · Score: 4, Informative

    Last year I got stung by a fairly common benign species of jellyfish called a blue bottle in the surf on a hot summer's day swim.

    I came up to the surface with the thing about a meter in front of me and immediately tried to escape. The tentacle wrapped around my left arm from my knuckles to the armpit, across the chest and onto the right are and, somehow, on my right left.

    The Lifesavers (clubbies) saw the whole thing as I got out of the surf two of them helped me over to the clubhouse and doused me we very hot water. Over the next three hours I had icepacks all over me and a nurse debated whether I would go to hospital as I just hung onto consciousness due to shock. The pain was astounding, my glands were inflated and later it felt like my testicles had been massaged by a hammer. I had welts on my arms for a couple of weeks from the sting. A year later I am still pulling stingers out of my arms which come up as painful little pimple like things that bleed and take about two weeks to heal (I'm looking at three now).

    That's "a fairly common benign species of jellyfish".

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    1. Re:Blue bottle sting by subreality · · Score: 1

      The blue bottle is this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portuguese_Man_o'_War . "Stings usually cause severe pain to humans, leaving whip-like, red welts on the skin that normally last 2 or 3 days after the initial sting, though the pain should subside after about an hour. However, the venom can travel to the lymph nodes and may cause, depending on the amount of venom, a more intense pain.[citation needed] A sting may lead to an allergic reaction. There can also be serious effects, including fever, shock, and interference with heart and lung function."

      That doesn't sound benign. You tangled with a genuine screamer.

    2. Re:Blue bottle sting by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      That doesn't sound benign. You tangled with a genuine screamer.

      I just remembered that they wouldn't let me drive home. When they say in the wiki you pulled up "cause severe pain to humans" it should read, "cancel any plans you may have had". Hot water really helped, though it says a lot about the pain when you are in a scalding hot shower in the middle of summer and that is the least of your problems.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  72. "End Of The Line" documentary by Guest316 · · Score: 1

    http://www.hulu.com/watch/197316 Very relevant. Set aside an hour to watch this. Free to watch, though you have to put up with ad breaks.

  73. Definitely _not_ China ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jellyfish - I hate jellyfish!

    China loves Jellyfish.

    For the Chinese, Jellyfish can be turned into delicious cuisines. Click the following link to find out ...

    http://bit.ly/1auPceQ

  74. I, for one... by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    ...am getting sick and tired of this lame old joke.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  75. Solution: What can we make with jellyfish? by fygment · · Score: 1

    Can they be converted in to a food supplement or fertilizer?

    Can we convince someone they are good for the libido (sexual appetite/performance)?

    Can they be made in to a soup, something like shark fins?

    Can they be incorporated in to a cosmetic?

    Achieve any of the above and we will begin to fish them in to extinction, problem solved.

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  76. Human greed, the cause of .... by fygment · · Score: 1

    ... and solution to all the world's problems. Find a marketable use for jellyfish.

    Hmm ... can you make a dangerous recreational drug out of the things? Jelly-meth?

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  77. I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...welcome our new tentacled, invading, gelatinous, stingy, phosphorescent, translucent, polypous overlords.

  78. aliens by Msdose · · Score: 0

    The sooner humans are cleared off this planet, the sooner the aliens can move in.

  79. Crunchy! by Pnarp · · Score: 1

    But I like jellyfish! They're crunchy and tasty and so tentacly good!