See everyone goes to this homes with lockers thing, but how about a simpler and preexisting solution. An antechamber for the front door?
To imagine it, start with the two doors some people might have already, a screen/glass door and the real door. Basically extend the distance between these two doors, and give it extra side space for travel. Bonus you also get a room to take on and off muddy/wet clothes, clean up dirty dogs, etc; before going into the house. The front most door would obviously use a different key and/or keypad to open, while the main door is kept securely locked at all times as far as the delivery person is concerned.
Hasn't the court ruled that such things need to not impede others from doing their business? I vaguely remember a Westboro Baptist Church court ruling on this. They had to stay silent and couldn't block people, but otherwise were legally able to be where they were.
He said he never "blacked out." Numerous fellow classmates have confirmed devil's triangle was a drinking game. As for boofing, are you arguing they meant ingesting alcohol via their asshole? I find it suspect you don't give a definition to the slang term when you do for the other.
"He also went on a tirade about Democrats and Clinton" We've been over this. BTW, you may want to look into Kavanaugh's relation to the Clintons.
The rest of you comment is just literally Democrat talking points.
I can't stand idiots that assume the politic persuasion of people based purely on the stance they take on a non-philosophical position that is irrespective of any political belief. but here we are.
Are telepathic? Do you have some powers beyond that of a normal person? You can't believe the hooey you just wrote do you?
"He wasn't an accused person as much as he was someone who had to answer a difficult question with real consequences." Is that a serious statement? Wow.
That's some mighty fine gaslighting. What's happening here is, Democrats (self-proclaimed defenders of women), sat on a supposedly credible allegation for over a month, and then when their histrionics failed to stop the nomination, they dropped the allegation and someone leaked the information about Ford to press (supposedly against her wishes).
An objective observer might notice from the testimony that Ford claims to have wanted to inform the senators during the choosing of the nomination stage. Which would've avoided this whole fiasco. But that wouldn't have served well for Democrats who have kept trying to push the nomination into Nov. and past the midterm in the hopes they could stop any Trump nominations the Supreme Court.
This is a bullying tactic you're employing and it's not right. You're discrediting the person because they are fighting back against an unfair process or accusation and using their resistance as evidence against them.
What was he caught lying about in his testimony? Please cite these things. I doubt you have much though, the tail end of your comment belies the heavy bias you're holding.
That's some nice concern trolling. He wasn't a judge in that situation, he was an accused person. The only people I've seen make those statements about his "temperament" in defending himself have been those who already didn't believe him or didn't want him confirmed period.
It would actually be worse, they'd only care about certain counties/cities. The following link has the election shown by counties for the 2012 Election. http://www-personal.umich.edu/...
Makes sense to me. Edge has almost always felt quicker, except when the web page doesn't want to play nice with the browser. Firefox after that, and personally Chrome has always been a sh1t show for me. I only use it when for some reason or another Firefox and IE/Edge won't play nice with a website.
Bah, alright fine, since this planet is supposed to be huge and its nature is unknown right now, how about the counterpart to Jupiter, Summanus. He's the god of nocturnal thunder, his exact nature isn't really well defined, and at one point was thought to be referred more than Jupiter.
Other possible picks, maybe Minerva or Bellona.
And I checked this time, lol. Unless someone named a planetary feature on one of these gods, they should be free to use!
I prefer calling it Janus, after the Roman god of "beginnings, gates, transitions, time, doorways, passages, and endings." As the presumably the most outer planet in our solar system, kind of fitting.
Eh, see this is why I was thinking of adding something to my signature. I'm using the arguments against those who use them first. Ghoul made it racial, so I turned it on them. I could've also called them transphobic or sexist for assuming the OP was a man and using the masculine gender pronouns without first asking what their preferred gender pronouns.
I know...it saddens me that I know so much about this...
Slashdot Mirror
See everyone goes to this homes with lockers thing, but how about a simpler and preexisting solution. An antechamber for the front door?
To imagine it, start with the two doors some people might have already, a screen/glass door and the real door. Basically extend the distance between these two doors, and give it extra side space for travel. Bonus you also get a room to take on and off muddy/wet clothes, clean up dirty dogs, etc; before going into the house. The front most door would obviously use a different key and/or keypad to open, while the main door is kept securely locked at all times as far as the delivery person is concerned.
Pictures are usually requirements put on last mile delivery services by Amazon.
Hasn't the court ruled that such things need to not impede others from doing their business? I vaguely remember a Westboro Baptist Church court ruling on this. They had to stay silent and couldn't block people, but otherwise were legally able to be where they were.
He said he never "blacked out." Numerous fellow classmates have confirmed devil's triangle was a drinking game. As for boofing, are you arguing they meant ingesting alcohol via their asshole? I find it suspect you don't give a definition to the slang term when you do for the other.
"He also went on a tirade about Democrats and Clinton"
We've been over this. BTW, you may want to look into Kavanaugh's relation to the Clintons.
The rest of you comment is just literally Democrat talking points.
I can't stand idiots that assume the politic persuasion of people based purely on the stance they take on a non-philosophical position that is irrespective of any political belief. but here we are.
Are telepathic? Do you have some powers beyond that of a normal person? You can't believe the hooey you just wrote do you?
"He wasn't an accused person as much as he was someone who had to answer a difficult question with real consequences."
Is that a serious statement? Wow.
That's a good one! You should do parties, you'd be great entertainment.
That's some mighty fine gaslighting. What's happening here is, Democrats (self-proclaimed defenders of women), sat on a supposedly credible allegation for over a month, and then when their histrionics failed to stop the nomination, they dropped the allegation and someone leaked the information about Ford to press (supposedly against her wishes).
An objective observer might notice from the testimony that Ford claims to have wanted to inform the senators during the choosing of the nomination stage. Which would've avoided this whole fiasco. But that wouldn't have served well for Democrats who have kept trying to push the nomination into Nov. and past the midterm in the hopes they could stop any Trump nominations the Supreme Court.
No he didn't. He said he didn't have connections to Yale LAW School. https://www.c-span.org/video/?... see about 2h 24m in.
This is a bullying tactic you're employing and it's not right. You're discrediting the person because they are fighting back against an unfair process or accusation and using their resistance as evidence against them.
What was he caught lying about in his testimony? Please cite these things. I doubt you have much though, the tail end of your comment belies the heavy bias you're holding.
That's some nice concern trolling. He wasn't a judge in that situation, he was an accused person. The only people I've seen make those statements about his "temperament" in defending himself have been those who already didn't believe him or didn't want him confirmed period.
lol wut, you think those idiots weren't trolling people with this crap before Trump's election? What lala land do you live in?
That joke is older than Hillary Clinton's uterus...it's also in the subject line of AC's subject...
Have you even looked at election maps?
http://www-personal.umich.edu/...
The cities are reliably Democrat.
It would actually be worse, they'd only care about certain counties/cities. The following link has the election shown by counties for the 2012 Election.
http://www-personal.umich.edu/...
The 2016 election is even more red.
Hurr hur they said butt.
Queue salty tears and overreaction.
Makes sense to me. Edge has almost always felt quicker, except when the web page doesn't want to play nice with the browser. Firefox after that, and personally Chrome has always been a sh1t show for me. I only use it when for some reason or another Firefox and IE/Edge won't play nice with a website.
Bah, alright fine, since this planet is supposed to be huge and its nature is unknown right now, how about the counterpart to Jupiter, Summanus. He's the god of nocturnal thunder, his exact nature isn't really well defined, and at one point was thought to be referred more than Jupiter.
Other possible picks, maybe Minerva or Bellona.
And I checked this time, lol. Unless someone named a planetary feature on one of these gods, they should be free to use!
I prefer calling it Janus, after the Roman god of "beginnings, gates, transitions, time, doorways, passages, and endings." As the presumably the most outer planet in our solar system, kind of fitting.
Man Richard Nixon and his observant inferences about Slashdot!
Sounds like they had good arguments, you got triggered, and then warped the memory in your mind to a bunch of rednecks shouting "Murica."
Eh, see this is why I was thinking of adding something to my signature. I'm using the arguments against those who use them first. Ghoul made it racial, so I turned it on them. I could've also called them transphobic or sexist for assuming the OP was a man and using the masculine gender pronouns without first asking what their preferred gender pronouns.
I know...it saddens me that I know so much about this...
In the UK situation HE was the foreigner. Are you that dense you racist?