Only three out of nine are not hardware RAID. And the article does mention which are which and it spends a whole page (page 3) on discussing the differences.
OK, I take that back. 2 of the controllers are completely software based and one is 'hardware assisted'. I guess I just ignored those completely when I read it the first time.
Even still, the article does explain that these three are not true hardware controllers and spends some time explaining what that means.
Except that all the controllers reviewed in this article are true hardware RAID with good linux support. In fact, the article even spends a good deal of time discussing the issue.
If you want RAID on Linux (SATA or otherwise) you use true hardware RAID if you can afford it or Linux software RAID if you can't. Why bother messing with that fake-RAID crap, even when Linux is supported?
It would be nice to get Mozilla 1.7 into sarge, though; it is currently in unstable. None of these packages are in base or standard so I assume that there is still some time for them to get in.
Slashdot Mirror
Wouldn't it have been a lot easier if they had just used a faster x86, faster nvidia, etc?
Ok, so all-caps PERL is a pretty common mistake but what's up with cPAN?
Well, there is the PhatBox but that probably isn't quite what you wanted.
Actually there are many portable players that support Ogg Vorbis. Most notably: players from iRiver, the Neuros, and the Rio Karma.
Full List
Munchies...
Fedora is not "a natural upgrade of Redhat". It is the free, community developed core that RedHat is based on.
... or OpenOffice is to StarOffice.
Fedora is to RedHat as Mozilla is to Netscape
What this tells us, is that there are plenty of people who run web servers and like RedHat but don't want to pay for it.
I've heard recommended:
http://www.vhcs.net/vhcs/
and
Virtualmin + Usermin
PerlDoc.com is (was) nice but perldoc.perldrunks.org actually works!
Only three out of nine are not hardware RAID. And the article does mention which are which and it spends a whole page (page 3) on discussing the differences.
All of them support at least RedHat. Some of them are binary only. This is listed on the feature charts:
http://www.tweakers.net/reviews/557/13
http://www.tweakers.net/reviews/557/14
Ok, I lied. Three of them are not hardware RAID.
OK, I take that back. 2 of the controllers are completely software based and one is 'hardware assisted'. I guess I just ignored those completely when I read it the first time.
Even still, the article does explain that these three are not true hardware controllers and spends some time explaining what that means.
All I care about is if these are 100% raid, unlike a seemingly increasing number of cards.
Yes they are.
Except that all the controllers reviewed in this article are true hardware RAID with good linux support. In fact, the article even spends a good deal of time discussing the issue.
If you want RAID on Linux (SATA or otherwise) you use true hardware RAID if you can afford it or Linux software RAID if you can't. Why bother messing with that fake-RAID crap, even when Linux is supported?
I just found these online: 12 LED fits in bulb socket
Don't put out a lot of light but might be good for some situations.
There is Catalyst
According to Mitchell Baker, AOL will still own the original content. Mozilla is only getting a license to use it.
This seems strange to me. What could AOL possibly want with it in the future?
http://jazilla.sourceforge.net/
Netscape release the source in January 1998. AOL bought Netscape in November 1998.
t io ns_Corporation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netscape_Communica
Canon has the worst linux support, though.
What is the Racer game they use as one of the benchmarks? At first I assumed they meant TuxRacer but then it describes driving a car, not a penguin.
Freshmeat gives two other possibilites, neither of which seem quite right.
The 18.5 minutes of silence finally explained: Richard Nixon was reading "My Pet Goat".
Actually, he was listening to Arlo Guthrie's "Alice's Restaurant"
A rose is a rose is rose, but nothing says geek love like Amorphophallus titanum...
Uhm, what? I don't mean to be rude but what exactly is geeky about a big stinky flower? I'm really confused by slashdot's obsession with this thing.
Gimp 2.0? Err... I thought it was in there. I think it was pulled out for dependancy issues. I don't know if it will make it in or not.
Mozilla 1.6? Check
OpenOffice 1.1? Check
It would be nice to get Mozilla 1.7 into sarge, though; it is currently in unstable. None of these packages are in base or standard so I assume that there is still some time for them to get in.
You mean this one:
or:
or perhaps:
That last one may be a different flower but what is the deal with slashdot's obsession with large stinky flowers?!?