My Cable internet is $36 a month (own the cable modem). Compare that with 2nd phone line ($15 a month) plus DUN ($15) a month. For a lousey $6 i get speed and 24/7 online'ness. And at $50 a month, still worth it. My $.02
this needs to be modded higher. This is a key point. Once Netscape gets put on CD's by ISPs ESPICALLY Aol watch that market share dwindle. As sorry as it is we need a monopoly to beat a monopoly.
I am a GS5 now in one of those IT jobs. You don't go through the steps to the right. You go down until you are a GS12. 6 months -> GS7, then yearly 9,11,12. Then promotions are compteditive.
...and we are supposed to be suprised by this? What's the chances this be held up in court. Im not a contract law scholar but I do recall that there needs to be a full knowledge of the terms of a contract. Forceing users to agree to terms of an agreement to run software, some forced to be used as part of the Windows empire, is tantamount to extortion.
This might be MS's answer to security, update the broken software w/o our knowledge and no one will know how poor they are with security.
EULA for this post:
I reserve the right to automatically update this post to with new words and punctuation marks w/o you express knowledge. Then when you comment on my errors and ommisions i can fix it so i seem intelligent.
My Cable internet is $36 a month (own the cable modem). Compare that with 2nd phone line ($15 a month) plus DUN ($15) a month. For a lousey $6 i get speed and 24/7 online'ness. And at $50 a month, still worth it. My $.02
this needs to be modded higher. This is a key point. Once Netscape gets put on CD's by ISPs ESPICALLY Aol watch that market share dwindle. As sorry as it is we need a monopoly to beat a monopoly.
They will probably offer him a position to teach constitutional law since its clear the current professors do not know it.
I am a GS5 now in one of those IT jobs. You don't go through the steps to the right. You go down until you are a GS12. 6 months -> GS7, then yearly 9,11,12. Then promotions are compteditive.
...and we are supposed to be suprised by this? What's the chances this be held up in court. Im not a contract law scholar but I do recall that there needs to be a full knowledge of the terms of a contract. Forceing users to agree to terms of an agreement to run software, some forced to be used as part of the Windows empire, is tantamount to extortion.
This might be MS's answer to security, update the broken software w/o our knowledge and no one will know how poor they are with security.
EULA for this post:
I reserve the right to automatically update this post to with new words and punctuation marks w/o you express knowledge. Then when you comment on my errors and ommisions i can fix it so i seem intelligent.
CD to CD player. RCA to stero microplug. Insert to line in. Record. Duh. :-)