Considering that the vast majority of societies throughout history condoned slavery, it is hardly fair to place the onus of any particular nation. THEY ARE ALL GUILTY.
FTA: with retirement dependent almost entirely on how well they manage savings. Two-thirds of millennials have nothing saved for retirement..... Social security, when it was established, was meant to be one leg of a stool," says Gerald Friedman, an economist at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst. "One leg would be the private pension through employment, a second leg personal savings, and a third leg social security. Social security is now the only source of income of a lot elderly have."
Everyone is completely bereft of personal responsibility? In the richest country in the history of the world, people can not be held responsible for their own future? They can be excused because they have to have the latest big-screen LED and Iphone? Fun fact: A high school student working less that 20 hours a week at minimum wage makes more than 90% of the rest of humanity.
As someone who has not been responsible with 401k savings, I can attest that it is not the rest of the country that is responsible for my retirement, and I do not care to hand more power over to clueless politicians and bureaucrats, which they will just use to garner more power. History has clearly shown they will badly mishandle any money that are given. Thank you, but no. Keep your so-called social security. I'll worry about me and mine.
You don't understand how this work. My data is worthless. What is valuable is the ability to target advertisements. A diaper company doesn't want to pay for ads to people without babies. FB, et. al., use the data to make the ads effective. If I'm not there to view ANY of their ads, they don't get paid. AT ALL
You can keep your ant farm for humans. I can stand outside at night and hear the wind blowing in the trees. When I lay down to sleep, it is actually dark in the room.
How about the gene for the ability to process lactose? I believe (but am willing to be corrected) that the gene is mostly European in origin. If you want that particular set of features, you'd choose "disease genes" that would fit the European "profile", and hope for the best.
Really? You can see the difference between material that has been classified as secret and above, and a discussion of where to meet to talk about getting hired? You can't see what people would draw a distinction?
The goalpost is sunk in concrete. Things just keep moving in your delusional world.
Fortunately, we have no need to read her mind or know her reasons. The particular laws covering the handling of secret materials makes no allowance for either intent or ignorance. In fact, it specifically states that neither is an excuse.
Now, can you please find someone deserving to be an apologist for?
OK then. Here is the evidence. She purposefully enabled the movement of highly classified material outside of secured areas, and since she signed off that she received the training, she knew the consequences for doing so...your red herrings not withstanding.
Hillary wasn't properly trained? What kind of bizarre nonsense is that? She was a lawyer that worked on the Watergate investigation. She was FLOTUS who took an active role in Bill's administration. She was a US Senator. She was Secretary of State. She SIGNED off on her training. It was the same training every other employee gets. And NOW you say she is innocent because... IGNORANT?!!
The problem is that a cable provider can't run EVERY available producer due to bandwidth limitations. At some point, a decision has to be made. Are we seeing the 9th district interceding into a private financial negotiation?
My wife fussed at me a few nights ago, because I was impolite to an ADT salesman that randomly showed up at my door. I'll tell you the same thing I told her:
-The salesman lied to me. She said she wasn't there to try to sell something. WTF ever. Get off my property. -The salesman attempted to manipulate to me. "Didn't they tell you at the closing that I would be coming?", she asked. A) The closing was months ago. B) No one ever told me that, and "they" is vague enough that I can't contradict you. C) If "they" HAD told me you were coming, I would have asked them to tell you to stay at home. D) Them "telling" me that you were coming is not a requirement that I give you the time of day. WTF ever. Get off my property. -The salesman attempted to manipulate me by assuming a posture of familiarity that was unearned. I didn't know her from Adam, and the "we're friends" attitude is an attempt to break down my barrier of suspicion. WTF ever. Get off my property. -If I wanted her product, I would have went looking for it. WTF ever. Get off my property. -When I saw her ADT folder as she was walking up to the door and said, "No, thank you.", she persisted. Salesmen are taught not to take No for an answer, but instead to push and manipulate. I have learned to say, "I'm not going to argue with you. Fuck you, and get off my property." followed by "I'm calling the police." I consider that relationship to be symmetrical.
People who come to me randomly, seeking to push something on me have no right to anything other than a blunt, "Go away." Telemarketers fit squarely within this category.
Ranked choice would do nothing about the people that know nothing. The vast majority of Americans would still hit R or D without even knowing who was on the ballot.
The answer is to force every name to be a write in. Candidates only get votes for having a ballot on which their name is correctly spelled. Yes, it is a poll tax, but requiring voters to know enough to be able to spell the candidates name is a very valid requirement, IMHO.
And gerrymandering or voter suppression doesn't matter if the Election Supervisor is either loosing ballots or stuffing in new ones.
And the influence of smaller States being larger is not a problem. It is a design concession. It is what was agreed to in exchange for them being willing to join the union. Try to change that and you can fully expect them to not submit to being governed by New York and California.
Slashdot Mirror
Considering that the vast majority of societies throughout history condoned slavery, it is hardly fair to place the onus of any particular nation. THEY ARE ALL GUILTY.
Then you have quite literally convicted the entire human race.
Someone send us "DOWN?" the bomb?
Which just happens to be an incredibly effective weapon. It is literally a very large hand grenade, so "close" does count.
FTA: with retirement dependent almost entirely on how well they manage savings. Two-thirds of millennials have nothing saved for retirement..... Social security, when it was established, was meant to be one leg of a stool," says Gerald Friedman, an economist at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst. "One leg would be the private pension through employment, a second leg personal savings, and a third leg social security. Social security is now the only source of income of a lot elderly have."
Everyone is completely bereft of personal responsibility? In the richest country in the history of the world, people can not be held responsible for their own future? They can be excused because they have to have the latest big-screen LED and Iphone? Fun fact: A high school student working less that 20 hours a week at minimum wage makes more than 90% of the rest of humanity.
As someone who has not been responsible with 401k savings, I can attest that it is not the rest of the country that is responsible for my retirement, and I do not care to hand more power over to clueless politicians and bureaucrats, which they will just use to garner more power. History has clearly shown they will badly mishandle any money that are given. Thank you, but no. Keep your so-called social security. I'll worry about me and mine.
You don't understand how this work. My data is worthless. What is valuable is the ability to target advertisements. A diaper company doesn't want to pay for ads to people without babies. FB, et. al., use the data to make the ads effective. If I'm not there to view ANY of their ads, they don't get paid. AT ALL
You can keep your ant farm for humans. I can stand outside at night and hear the wind blowing in the trees. When I lay down to sleep, it is actually dark in the room.
How about the gene for the ability to process lactose? I believe (but am willing to be corrected) that the gene is mostly European in origin. If you want that particular set of features, you'd choose "disease genes" that would fit the European "profile", and hope for the best.
All your base pairs belong to us!
That, combined with legitimately disqualifying issues like a (single) credible allegation,
Which allegation was that? Ford's claims were so full of holes that it left the flat earthers stunned. What made them credible?
Not according to polls. And not according to history. I mean, you have to go back to Nixon's impeachment^W resignation to get a similar bump.
Really? You're just going to skip right over 2010? Just act like it didn't happen?
Really? You can see the difference between material that has been classified as secret and above, and a discussion of where to meet to talk about getting hired? You can't see what people would draw a distinction?
The goalpost is sunk in concrete. Things just keep moving in your delusional world.
Fortunately, we have no need to read her mind or know her reasons. The particular laws covering the handling of secret materials makes no allowance for either intent or ignorance. In fact, it specifically states that neither is an excuse.
Now, can you please find someone deserving to be an apologist for?
OK then. Here is the evidence. She purposefully enabled the movement of highly classified material outside of secured areas, and since she signed off that she received the training, she knew the consequences for doing so...your red herrings not withstanding.
She signed off that she took the training, a requirement to get a security clearance. Your claim is lame.
That was done by BLACK MAN GOOD, so obviously, no problem.
And Hillary was told no blackberry outside the sciff. I fail to see your point.
Hillary wasn't properly trained? What kind of bizarre nonsense is that? She was a lawyer that worked on the Watergate investigation. She was FLOTUS who took an active role in Bill's administration. She was a US Senator. She was Secretary of State. She SIGNED off on her training. It was the same training every other employee gets. And NOW you say she is innocent because ... IGNORANT?!!
You sir, are ABSURD.
. . . and you forgot that was the person trying to cover for Hillary fault
FTFY.
The FBI had possession of Weiner's laptop for a month, but the guy trying to take down Trump sat on it.
His response should have been to turn the evidence over to the DOJ and let them suffer the political hit of explaining why they were burying it.
You've never heard of equal protection under the law?
Speak for yourself, Anonymous Coward.
The problem is that a cable provider can't run EVERY available producer due to bandwidth limitations. At some point, a decision has to be made. Are we seeing the 9th district interceding into a private financial negotiation?
My wife fussed at me a few nights ago, because I was impolite to an ADT salesman that randomly showed up at my door. I'll tell you the same thing I told her:
-The salesman lied to me. She said she wasn't there to try to sell something. WTF ever. Get off my property.
-The salesman attempted to manipulate to me. "Didn't they tell you at the closing that I would be coming?", she asked. A) The closing was months ago. B) No one ever told me that, and "they" is vague enough that I can't contradict you. C) If "they" HAD told me you were coming, I would have asked them to tell you to stay at home. D) Them "telling" me that you were coming is not a requirement that I give you the time of day. WTF ever. Get off my property.
-The salesman attempted to manipulate me by assuming a posture of familiarity that was unearned. I didn't know her from Adam, and the "we're friends" attitude is an attempt to break down my barrier of suspicion. WTF ever. Get off my property.
-If I wanted her product, I would have went looking for it. WTF ever. Get off my property.
-When I saw her ADT folder as she was walking up to the door and said, "No, thank you.", she persisted. Salesmen are taught not to take No for an answer, but instead to push and manipulate. I have learned to say, "I'm not going to argue with you. Fuck you, and get off my property." followed by "I'm calling the police." I consider that relationship to be symmetrical.
People who come to me randomly, seeking to push something on me have no right to anything other than a blunt, "Go away." Telemarketers fit squarely within this category.
Ranked choice would do nothing about the people that know nothing. The vast majority of Americans would still hit R or D without even knowing who was on the ballot.
The answer is to force every name to be a write in. Candidates only get votes for having a ballot on which their name is correctly spelled. Yes, it is a poll tax, but requiring voters to know enough to be able to spell the candidates name is a very valid requirement, IMHO.
And gerrymandering or voter suppression doesn't matter if the Election Supervisor is either loosing ballots or stuffing in new ones.
And the influence of smaller States being larger is not a problem. It is a design concession. It is what was agreed to in exchange for them being willing to join the union. Try to change that and you can fully expect them to not submit to being governed by New York and California.