Shareaza's developer(s) are committed to only supporting protocols that are open and support full file hashing so that there aren't a bunch of corrupted files spreading around the network. For that reason the main branch will never support most (if not all) of the protocols you mentioned.
LimeWire is a great Gnutella program but that's all it is (Shareaza supports four protocols) and it still lacks lots of features that Shareaza has like ghost ratings (tells people about bad files that you've deleted) and the ability to ignore ID3 tags while hashing (even if people change their ID3 tags, it will still have the same hash).
Also, Shareaza's Gnutella performence isn't too great because: 1) Its Gnutella code hasn't been updated much because Mike (Shareaza's creator) seems to want everyone to use 'Gnutella 2' instead and he's been busy adding lots of features into Shareaza. 2) Shareaza is only a Gnutella Leaf node and depends on other clients to be the Ultrapeers but most Gnutella clients started to give preference to their own kind (ie. LimeWire mostly only connects to other LimeWire clients) even though it goes against their own ideology.
Shareaza is heavily dependent on MFC libraries and so it will probably be a while before any ports pop up. For those wondering why anybody would want a port of Shareaza, well it has support for four file sharing protocols (Gnutella, Gnutella 2, ED2K, and Bit Torrent) and can simultaneously download parts of a file from each network as long as it has the needed hashes. So instead of running several clients to download all the files you want from different p2p networks, you can just use one program to do it all.
And what sort of battery is going to last you long enough to take all those shots on your long outtings? Since you're going to have to be swapping batteries like crazy, why can't you swap CF cards too?
I said most compact flash cards can't transfer above USB 1.1 speeds. CF cards over 16x are quite pricey (double the price) and generally considered to be 'Professional'.
There's hardly any reason for them to use USB 2.0 because most compact flash cards can't transfer above USB 1.1 speeds. A 12x compact flash card transfers at 14.4 mbps which is just barely over USB 1.1's limit.
I think you mean broadcast domain. There's absolutely no way you could have 90 hosts in a single collision domain and get decent performence if anything at all.
It only attained 180 Gflops because they were only able to get 256 computers working properly. They were using a 2.5 linux kernel which AFAIK had trouble with nforce ethernet ports which may have ruled out all the AMD's from working. They really didn't provide participants with much information about what was going on. After booting my computer and having it do a quick linpack test, I had to leave the area for the rest of the day. they should have at least had us stay long enough to get it to connect to the cluster. For the rest of the day they had very boring lectures about super-computing that had very generalized information. I never heard anything about what was going on until the end when they just told us that they had gotten 256 computers to achieve 180 Gflops and that we could leave.
You're right about local stores, at least in my area, they are very delayed.
Well what do you expect. A small computer shop doesn't want to buy $500+ parts that are just going to sit on the shelves until they've lost half their value. It's simple economics: supply only what there's demand for.
"Do any of you have successful family owned IT businesses, eBay businesses, or programming/software consulting engineering businesses and what's been or secret to success?"
What does eBay have to do with this? Even though it uses technology to function, it's still an auction business, not an IT/tech business. That said, I know of some people who make a living off of eBay and they have a pretty relaxed way of working. It usually involves lots of shopping (something most women would do anyways) and then a couple hours of taking photos and making a description of the item for the auction page. It's a good way for compulsive shoppers to put their habit into good use.
Even if other browsers don't fully support the latest standards, at least they're showing regular progress. IE's renderer hasn't been changed since IE 5.5 around 5 years ago. And even though it's claimed to be fully compliant with CSS 1.0, it has been proven to be otherwise.
1. The act or an instance of extorting.
2. Illegal use of one's official position or powers to obtain property, funds, or patronage.
3. An excessive or exorbitant charge. 4. Something extorted.
$300,000 is definately an excessive charge for the bandwidth and even his work. My website gets around three million hits too but it only costs a whopping $6/month for hosting. That pretty much means he wanted $10,000/month for his work. Only the courts will be able to decide whether it was an illegal use of one's official position or powers to obtain property, funds, or patronage or if it's just plain capitalism.
Has anybody actually been able to try this beta to see if there really is AV software included? The screenshots I've seen of a slightly older build (2077) show that it's only recommending you to install AV, not that it already has it.
Or you could just do the smart thing by turning vertical syncronization (vsync) on in your graphics drivers so that it will only render as many frames as your monitor can display. I'd recommend never turning vsync off when playing games; only turn it off for benchmarking.
Most businesses won't give a damn about video streaming, especially when it's possible with a 10 Mbps link - you should avoid even mentioning video unless they want to know about teleconferencing. You've got to provide them with reasons why they NEED that fast of a connection. A few obvious things are: 1) Connecting multiple offices together (with many hosts) so they can work in harmony instead of waiting hours to finish transfering something and playing solitaire while they wait. 2) Providing access to (a) storage area network(s) which could be used to store all their backups which eliminates the hassle of using tapes. 3) Connecting a HUGE number of hosts together with a few routers and tons of switches. 4) Providing room to grow. If you can't demonstrate many hosts utilizing the link simultaneously, the next best thing would be to show one host transfering a backup of the OS or a large database. Just be sure that the computers you use have hard drives (RAID's if you're only using one host on each end) that are fast enough to keep up with the link.
Regarding choking hazards, the hospital gave us this handy little plastic guage (basically just a clear acrylic tube with one end closed.) If it can fit in the tube and touch bottom, it needs to be out of reach.
I'll bet they charged you $20 for it too when all you need is a toilet-paper tube for the same use.
I think it all comes down to whether the video card itself can support AGP 8x or not. If it does, then it's a 9200 in a motherboard that can only handle AGP 4x. If it doesn't, then it's a 9000 and they're advertising false information.
Well, the audacity of Anonymous Coward's to continue refering to (native) Americans as Indians never ceases to amaze and disgust me. India is a country of it's own, so quit taking away their identity and giving it to other cultures.
Naming the project 'Apache' is in no way disciminating against race as you so naively think.
The thing that makes it an O(1) scheduler is that it has a static overhead. In high load it should achieve the same throughput but have lower latency when reacting to important events like user input.
Slashdot Mirror
Aparently you've never heard of CorePNG.
Shareaza's developer(s) are committed to only supporting protocols that are open and support full file hashing so that there aren't a bunch of corrupted files spreading around the network. For that reason the main branch will never support most (if not all) of the protocols you mentioned.
LimeWire is a great Gnutella program but that's all it is (Shareaza supports four protocols) and it still lacks lots of features that Shareaza has like ghost ratings (tells people about bad files that you've deleted) and the ability to ignore ID3 tags while hashing (even if people change their ID3 tags, it will still have the same hash).
Also, Shareaza's Gnutella performence isn't too great because:
1) Its Gnutella code hasn't been updated much because Mike (Shareaza's creator) seems to want everyone to use 'Gnutella 2' instead and he's been busy adding lots of features into Shareaza.
2) Shareaza is only a Gnutella Leaf node and depends on other clients to be the Ultrapeers but most Gnutella clients started to give preference to their own kind (ie. LimeWire mostly only connects to other LimeWire clients) even though it goes against their own ideology.
Shareaza is heavily dependent on MFC libraries and so it will probably be a while before any ports pop up. For those wondering why anybody would want a port of Shareaza, well it has support for four file sharing protocols (Gnutella, Gnutella 2, ED2K, and Bit Torrent) and can simultaneously download parts of a file from each network as long as it has the needed hashes. So instead of running several clients to download all the files you want from different p2p networks, you can just use one program to do it all.
And what sort of battery is going to last you long enough to take all those shots on your long outtings? Since you're going to have to be swapping batteries like crazy, why can't you swap CF cards too?
I said most compact flash cards can't transfer above USB 1.1 speeds. CF cards over 16x are quite pricey (double the price) and generally considered to be 'Professional'.
There's hardly any reason for them to use USB 2.0 because most compact flash cards can't transfer above USB 1.1 speeds. A 12x compact flash card transfers at 14.4 mbps which is just barely over USB 1.1's limit.
I think you mean broadcast domain. There's absolutely no way you could have 90 hosts in a single collision domain and get decent performence if anything at all.
It only attained 180 Gflops because they were only able to get 256 computers working properly. They were using a 2.5 linux kernel which AFAIK had trouble with nforce ethernet ports which may have ruled out all the AMD's from working. They really didn't provide participants with much information about what was going on. After booting my computer and having it do a quick linpack test, I had to leave the area for the rest of the day. they should have at least had us stay long enough to get it to connect to the cluster. For the rest of the day they had very boring lectures about super-computing that had very generalized information. I never heard anything about what was going on until the end when they just told us that they had gotten 256 computers to achieve 180 Gflops and that we could leave.
You're right about local stores, at least in my area, they are very delayed.
Well what do you expect. A small computer shop doesn't want to buy $500+ parts that are just going to sit on the shelves until they've lost half their value. It's simple economics: supply only what there's demand for.
You seem to be confusing 3DMark03 with 3DMark01. The system you described would be lucky to get '5000' in 3DMark03.
"Do any of you have successful family owned IT businesses, eBay businesses, or programming/software consulting engineering businesses and what's been or secret to success?"
What does eBay have to do with this? Even though it uses technology to function, it's still an auction business, not an IT/tech business. That said, I know of some people who make a living off of eBay and they have a pretty relaxed way of working. It usually involves lots of shopping (something most women would do anyways) and then a couple hours of taking photos and making a description of the item for the auction page. It's a good way for compulsive shoppers to put their habit into good use.
"So Andy got hold of a camera that takes 750 frames a second and recorded some rather gorgeous video clips of what was happening."
So quit hoggin' it and let us have some of that sweet sweet goodness.
Even if other browsers don't fully support the latest standards, at least they're showing regular progress. IE's renderer hasn't been changed since IE 5.5 around 5 years ago. And even though it's claimed to be fully compliant with CSS 1.0, it has been proven to be otherwise.
According to Dictionary.com extortion is:
1. The act or an instance of extorting.
2. Illegal use of one's official position or powers to obtain property, funds, or patronage.
3. An excessive or exorbitant charge.
4. Something extorted.
$300,000 is definately an excessive charge for the bandwidth and even his work. My website gets around three million hits too but it only costs a whopping $6/month for hosting. That pretty much means he wanted $10,000/month for his work. Only the courts will be able to decide whether it was an illegal use of one's official position or powers to obtain property, funds, or patronage or if it's just plain capitalism.
Has anybody actually been able to try this beta to see if there really is AV software included? The screenshots I've seen of a slightly older build (2077) show that it's only recommending you to install AV, not that it already has it.
Or you could just do the smart thing by turning vertical syncronization (vsync) on in your graphics drivers so that it will only render as many frames as your monitor can display. I'd recommend never turning vsync off when playing games; only turn it off for benchmarking.
Most businesses won't give a damn about video streaming, especially when it's possible with a 10 Mbps link - you should avoid even mentioning video unless they want to know about teleconferencing. You've got to provide them with reasons why they NEED that fast of a connection. A few obvious things are:
1) Connecting multiple offices together (with many hosts) so they can work in harmony instead of waiting hours to finish transfering something and playing solitaire while they wait.
2) Providing access to (a) storage area network(s) which could be used to store all their backups which eliminates the hassle of using tapes.
3) Connecting a HUGE number of hosts together with a few routers and tons of switches.
4) Providing room to grow.
If you can't demonstrate many hosts utilizing the link simultaneously, the next best thing would be to show one host transfering a backup of the OS or a large database. Just be sure that the computers you use have hard drives (RAID's if you're only using one host on each end) that are fast enough to keep up with the link.
How could you possibly run a 64 bit binary on a 32 bit cpu?
You forgot these:
? = will suck
Episode 7 = will suck
Episode 8 = will suck
Episode 9 = will suck
George Lucas = should retire and let someone with talent handle his business
Regarding choking hazards, the hospital gave us this handy little plastic guage (basically just a clear acrylic tube with one end closed.) If it can fit in the tube and touch bottom, it needs to be out of reach. I'll bet they charged you $20 for it too when all you need is a toilet-paper tube for the same use.
I think it all comes down to whether the video card itself can support AGP 8x or not. If it does, then it's a 9200 in a motherboard that can only handle AGP 4x. If it doesn't, then it's a 9000 and they're advertising false information.
Well, the audacity of Anonymous Coward's to continue refering to (native) Americans as Indians never ceases to amaze and disgust me. India is a country of it's own, so quit taking away their identity and giving it to other cultures.
Naming the project 'Apache' is in no way disciminating against race as you so naively think.
This uses Java not Javascript; learn the difference.
The thing that makes it an O(1) scheduler is that it has a static overhead. In high load it should achieve the same throughput but have lower latency when reacting to important events like user input.