Slashdot Mirror


Star Wars Sequel Trilogy Rumors

Stop reading if you're spoiler paranoid. ChazeFroy writes "The actor who played Chewbacca in the original Star Wars trilogy, Peter Mayhew, will be in Episode III. Of course, this has been previously reported and comes as no surprise. However, TheForce is reporting that Mayhew's contract contains a stipulation that he must also appear in Episodes 7, 8, and 9. This was first reported in the British movie magazine Hot Dog, whose December issue with this news just hit US newstands."

723 comments

  1. Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Xeriar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or there will be hell to pay. Nothing else was worth reading.

    1. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      I will take anything other than Terry Brooks.

      I was surprised EP1 didn't have some sort of wise overseer who wouldn't tell people what he knew, only what he thought they needed to know.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    2. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

      The Zahn Trilogy was extra special, but there are a lot of worth stories to tell in the Star Wars universe. I'm really enjoying the 22-volume New Jedi Order series. That's been just great!

    3. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      I've not read anything else in the EU, but the Zahn Trilogy was as good as it gets.

    4. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by ColdGrits · · Score: 1

      Yup, I'm with you 100% on that!

      Although I guess actually it would need 5 films, to cover Zahn's trilogy and the two-parter that follows a little later which really DOES lead to a very neat conclusion.

      Here's hoping, but I rather doubt there'll be 7-9 sadly. After all, it has been denied for so long, and Star Wars seems to have become "The life and death of Anakin Skywalker" so Ep 6 concludes it I suppose. Who knows?

      --
      People should not be afraid of their governments - Governments should be afraid of their people.
    5. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by ArmenTanzarian · · Score: 1

      He had two didn't he? The one with the original Thrawn and the one with the (to prevent spoiler) other Thrawn? Either way I agree, the Star Wars books were okay, but his were by far the best.

    6. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm with seeing Thrawn & Co. up on the big screen, but only if George Lucas steps his monkey ass down as writer and director and let's someone talented handle it. He can be Executive Producer and just sit in the back eating corn chips and cackling.

    7. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      If it's not the Zahn trilogy, it would have to be all the original characters' children. The Skywalker family is the centerpiece of all of the movies.

      Anyway, if it IS the Zahn trilogy, I want to be the first to call for James Woods as Thrawn.

    8. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'd be sweet, although I doubt it would happen.

    9. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by TrollBridge · · Score: 1
      I 100% concur!

      The Zahn books were by far the cream of the crop of SW-related books. The rest don't hold a candle to the depth and suspense of his work.

      --
      There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
    10. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      I've talked to a lot of people who don't like the new series, but I personally agree with you.

      It's nice to see the formerly invincible heroes of the past 600 books finally look a little vulnerable... major characters dying, good guys losing for huge multi-book story arcs...

      People whine "OMG YOU KILLED _______" when it was actually one of the best things they could have done for the Star Wars universe.

    11. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by milkman_matt · · Score: 3, Funny
      People whine "OMG YOU KILLED _______" when it was actually one of the best things they could have done for the Star Wars universe.

      They killed JarJar?

      -matt

    12. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by arth1 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Or there will be hell to pay. Nothing else was worth reading.

      A good novel seldom makes for a good movie.
      There's simply not enough time in a movie. A good novella or short story is what you really need, else you need an expert at chopping -- the better the novel is, the harder it gets, cause in a really good novel, everything is essential.

      Regards,
      --
      *Art
    13. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by ArmenTanzarian · · Score: 1

      If they'll ever make another good movie, it'll have to follow the same formula as the originals. I'm thinking Thrawn has to be some powerful intimidating actor that we've never heard of. Preferably British, since many of the military guys in the first ones had British accents. Thrawn's accent is supposed to be a little foreign too though, so maybe another European who learned English from a Brit (which would aid in the "never heard of him" factor).

    14. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

      I obviously know who you're referring to about getting killed off in the NJO series. I also agree with you that it improved the Star Wars universe. It allows for my dialogue now.

    15. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by ArmenTanzarian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think LOTR made believers out of this crowd. Proof that enough money, love, time and geekdom can pull off a quality interpretation.

      You'll never get a direct translation, even in a short story. A raised eyebrow or a sardonic smile means a lot more when written down than it would if you made a point of zooming in on it. Not to mention that imagery and metaphor are difficult to pull off without narration, which is too often a cheaply used device and completely blows the subtlety it had on the page.

    16. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a scary person.

    17. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Gherald · · Score: 1

      I guess it was a good decision. But it sure was sad, especially when it could have been avoided so easily =(

    18. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by samsmithnz · · Score: 1

      22 Volumes!!!

      Is this a joke???

    19. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Fl1bble · · Score: 2, Funny

      People whine "OMG YOU KILLED _______" when it was actually one of the best things they could have done for the Star Wars universe.

      What??? Kenny was in Star Wars??? I think I would have noticed him!!

    20. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by kev0153 · · Score: 1

      The mental image this presents, "sit in the back eating corn chips and cackling", is both hilarious and disturbing.

    21. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize that Terry Brooks only wrote the novelization of the movie. George Lucas wrote the screenplay.

    22. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by mcheu · · Score: 1

      As the director, the man's actually still pretty good. You may not like the plot, dialog, or weird tidbits that cheapen the mythology (miti-what?), but you've got to admit that the scenes themselves are fairly well organized and he's very good with the visuals. Just about everything that people have complained about in the movies (so far) involve his skills as a writer.

      The man just needs to keep his hands out of the writer's cookie jar. He may be StarWar's father, but it's outgrown him in a lot of ways. The trouble is, in interviews and behind the scenes footage, he comes across as a bit of a control freak, and he actually does have enough clout to enforce it.

      I admit, as a fan, the Thrawn (prime) trilogy has a lot of appeal. It has a lot of potential if it stays focussed on the subject matter. The major problem with doing Zahn's "Heir to the Empire" trilogy is the timing. All the principles are going to need a lot of make-up if they want to reprise their roles and I don't think anybody's going to buy it if Lucas hires look-alikes.

    23. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bruce Campbell!

    24. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rumor has it Stephen Spielberg has been begging Lucas to let him do a Star Wars...

    25. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by sbowles · · Score: 1
      If the rumour is true, I'd be very surprised if the story comes from any of the books that cover the Extended Universe.

      In order to make money from things like Hyperspace, he'd have to have a fresh (not to be confused with good) story that he could keep secret. If he used the Zahn books, all the talk would be fear over whether or not Lucas was going to ruin the story.

      Using fresh story lines would keep the fan networks paying subscriptions hoping against hope for something unique and epic.

      --
      You sly dog: you got me monologuing! - Syndrome
    26. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by TonyZahn · · Score: 1

      Yeah!! Zahn's books were great, much better than that crap lucas has been putting out.

      Must be something in the name...

      --
      - sig? who is this sig of which you speak?
    27. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Gherald · · Score: 1

      no that is episode 3 material /me prays

    28. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by leinerj · · Score: 1

      Where do you think they got the character design and look for Jabba The Hutt?

    29. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet the new trilogy will be somewhat based on the Jedi Knight games.....be prepare for alot of yawspeed exploits and ass fighting

    30. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by phishtrader · · Score: 1

      No and yes.

    31. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by pokeyburro · · Score: 1

      How about Ciaran Hinds as Thrawn? Tall, imposing figure, dark hair, played President Nemerov in The Sum of all Fears. Irish-born IIRC, but he could certainly do some accent if needed.

      --
      Lately democracy seems to be based on the skybox, the Happy Meal box, the X-box, and the idiot box.
    32. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "People whine "OMG YOU KILLED _______" when it was actually one of the best things they could have done for the Star Wars universe."

      Uh, I read the book I think you're referring to, and the 'OMG YOU KILLED ____' whining was a result of the death of that character not being terribly interesting. The book was poorly written and the story was plain and dull. The death of that character had more to do with getting copies of the book sold than some inspired story arc.

      Of course, we could possibly be talking about two different books.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    33. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 1
      I doubt it'll happen cuz Lucas is so proud he won't let anyone do Star Wars better than him, and Spielberg would do exactly that.

      Couse I hope I'm wrong.

      --
      Needle Nardle Noo
    34. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Total_Wimp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "As the director, the man's actually still pretty good."

      Watch epII and Minority Report back to back. They both were made a virtually the same time so they both had the same CG technology available. Watch the big-fight-in-a-factory scene that is present in both. There is no comparison. epII is cartoony and almost amaturish by comparison to to the work of Spielberg.

      You can compare scenes throughout epI and epII to similar sceens in other movies with similar results. Lucas is a mediocre director at best. A number of good directors would produce much better movies than Lucas if they had the same high quality actors and technology available on epI & II, even if they were saddled with the same script.

      TW

    35. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by ArmenTanzarian · · Score: 1

      didn't see that one, but looking at the photos on IMDB, I'd say he looks like a good fit. Maybe a stronger jawline though.

    36. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by visgoth · · Score: 1

      Easy there, Yoda. The young padawan's head just exploded!

      --
      My patience is infinite, my time is not.
    37. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by mog007 · · Score: 1

      Anderson's Jedi Academy trilogy wouldn't make a bad set of movies, either.

    38. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by mog007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So let Spielberg handle the directing and Lucas handle the Producing, they've worked well enough in the past.

      Indiana Jones, anyone?

    39. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, I'd love to see Knights of the Old Republic get the movie treatment. It would be better than the prequel crap we've been getting for the last six years.

      SpaceCowboy

    40. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by SithLordOfLanc · · Score: 0

      There was the first set written by Zahn, normally referred to at the Thrawn Trilogy (Heir to the Empire, Dark force Rising and The last Command. Then a few years later, we saw the Thrawn duology (Specter of the Past and Vision of the Future.)

    41. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Yes it would.

    42. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by JExtine · · Score: 2, Funny
      He can be Executive Producer and just sit in the back eating corn chips and cackling.

      Don't forget counting the money...

    43. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Another fucking lame stupid Jar Jar joke. You losers are far more annoying to me than Jar Jar ever was in the movies.

    44. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2, Funny

      He was in Ep. 4! Owen Lars bought the droids from him!

    45. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Dix_sw · · Score: 1

      Problem is, it's to far away from the original trialogy. Too many things in the middle, new characters,...

      Zahn's triology, on the other hand, was written exactly that way, as a sequel, with nothing in between (_later_ other things where added).

      Having read only vector prime from NJO, Zahn's books are by far my favourite, both the NR and the Hand of Thrawn.

      Well, as long as it's nothing from Kevin J. Anderson, I'm fine ;)
      (AKA, hey, let's make another Death Star/modification/prototype/super weapon/etc)

      --
      "So, once you know what the question actually is, you'll know what the answer means."
    46. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Durandal64 · · Score: 1

      There are a couple good books in NJO, but overall, it's crap. I was really hoping that Star Wars would resist the whole "organic technology" fad in sci-fi, whereby all organic technology is inherently superior, despite the fact that living cells must be more permeable than a simple metal plate and that biological processes are inefficient and imprecise compared to finely-tuned mechanical ones. I guess it was a fool's hope, though. Most sci-fi authors are just fools when it comes to science.

    47. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      That explains the missing "wise overseer" part then.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    48. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by gilrain · · Score: 1

      I loved KotOR as well, but it's ironic that you emphasize "prequel" in your sentence. KotOR would make for an even earlier prequel than Eps 1-3. ;)

    49. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Durandal64 · · Score: 1

      You mean Kevin "All My Stories Must Involve Superweapons Because I'm Not Original In Any Sense At All" J. Anderson? Give me a break. If you think Episodes I and II are bad, Jedi Academy as a movie would be even worse than those two.

    50. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Dear lord no.

      I mean Lucas's latest attempt have been not up to snuff, but there's no sense in insulting Lucas that much.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    51. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Kenny

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    52. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      preach it brother!

    53. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where exactly would Spielberg add in the unnesscary holocaust scene though?

    54. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by slipgun · · Score: 1

      Zahn's trilogy is very good. However have you tried reading Anne Crispin's Han Solo trilogy? I loved it, although it might not be for everyone. Of course, they can't base episodes VII, VIII and IX on Han's life.

      And I agree with you that many other Starwars books are crap...

      --
      SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
    55. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by corbettw · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Except that Minority Report was sci-fi film noir, and so was filmed in a darker style. Star Wars has always been, and always will be, pulp sci-fi, a la Flash Gordon serials from the 30's. Lucas has said time and again the movies were inspired by those old serials, so of course they're going to have a "cartoony" feel to them.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    56. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My view is that Lucas's best talent lies with imagining new worlds, landscapes, alien creatures, etc. For writing, he flat-out sucks. He needs to come up with an overall outline, and let other, more talented people do the storytelling, plot, dialogue, etc. When he let someone else do the writing in Empire Strikes Back, the result was excellent.

    57. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by teklob · · Score: 1

      no good movies made from good novels??? Lord of the Rings *trilogy*, Fight Club, Red Dragon are a few of my favorites

    58. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      Actually the power plants in cells are WAY more efficient than mechanical engines.

      BTW, not all organic materials are weak and flimsy. Creatures can secrete armour and do all kinds of wonderful things. The idea that these things could be engineered isn't bizarre.

      BTW, Moia ROCKS!!!!!

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    59. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Wister285 · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. Star Wars resisted it for so long and then this series comes along and completely changes the Expanded Universe. Personally, I would have liked if Luke was given a break for once. There are times of peace in the universe after all and even the Galactic Civil War was relatively peaceful. I think it's annoying when the same style of story keeps getting written over and over and none of the writers even think to do something a long time ago (like the game Knights of the Old Republic) or start with fresh new characters that take over the original trilogy's jobs. Luke and the rest should do something not normal, like take a desk job.

      The whole Coruscant ordeal is by far the most annoying. Having the power to move an entire planet is just too ridiculous, even for extreme science fiction. It's a whole order of magnitude more ridiculous than blowing up an entire planet with a laser!

    60. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Wister285 · · Score: 1

      They were basically created to be impossible to beat. Being Force "resistant" and organic at the same time completely ruins the spirit of Star Wars.

    61. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Paleomacus · · Score: 1

      Some of the authors left much to be desired. I wish they wouldn't have been so set on releasing the entire series so rapidly. I forget the names of the authors that I didn't care for but one couldn't describe a space battle(Greg Bear I believe), and another one or two thought that they were really funny(they weren't funny, just irritating).

    62. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you talking about killing Chewbacca? I think it's gonna be ret-conned.

    63. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by lukior · · Score: 1

      No Kidding. I used to live in the same town as Timothy Zahn (Coos Bay, Oregon) and he would always come to the library to sign books and what not. Way cool guy.

      --
      I would like to salute the ashes of american flags, and all the fallen leaves filling up shopping bags.
    64. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      I agree. I saw Minority Report, and didn't notice that some things were done with CGI. I assumed they had good stuntmen, or something had been made using models (trying not to give anything away here!).

      It was only when I saw the extras that I twigged what had been done.

    65. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like all good comedy, it's funny becuase it's true.

    66. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by cujo_1111 · · Score: 1

      I didn't know Kenny had a brother? In fact there were lots of little Kenny's there, did Dr Mephisto develop a cloning technique?

      Let us just hope that the clones don't have 4 asses...

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    67. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Durandal64 · · Score: 1
      Actually the power plants in cells are WAY more efficient than mechanical engines. BTW, not all organic materials are weak and flimsy. Creatures can secrete armour and do all kinds of wonderful things. The idea that these things could be engineered isn't bizarre.
      Biological materials are chemically reactive and structurally weak compared to inert pieces of metal. We started out with "bio armor," remember? It was called wood and leather. We then moved to steel because it was better. The cells making up biological materials must be permeable by definition in order to function properly. I challenge you to find a purely biological material that has the specific heat capacity of ordinary steel.

      There's also the question of computing to consider. Our current computers operate on smaller scales than biological computers ever could. If you ever make a transistor out of living cells, let me know.
    68. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by cujo_1111 · · Score: 1

      Are you the Architect?

      Do you know what I am going to do before I make a decision? Do I really have any choice in this?

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    69. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --That's De MONET!! [/HarveyKorman]

      ( http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0082517/ )

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    70. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 1
      How about Ciaran Hinds as Thrawn? Tall, imposing figure, dark hair, played President Nemerov in The Sum of all Fears. Irish-born IIRC, but he could certainly do some accent if needed.

      i like it. let's go with it. we'll just film some footage of him walking and standing still and let the CGI folks take care of the effects.

    71. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by mabhatter654 · · Score: 0

      no, the pasiley-side of the force has kept JarJar alive for 500 years!

    72. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      And young Anakin Solo too! Ouch! I haven't read the last book yet to see who else they kill off.

    73. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      Roughly 1 per quarter since about ep1 came out. Actually it's kinda cool since they were doing about 1 per 6 months before ep1 came out. I particulary like some of the new characters. Jacen and Jaina are really cool. They were created completely in novels and it's cool that the "history" is so complete...considering their in close to 40 books!

      That said, Zahn has a special place in SW hearts. He and Cam Kennedy were some of the few people to keep SW alive in the years prior to Ep1. First out of the "new" Star Wars was Dark Empire though...Very very cool.. it's a must read. the only problem is that These guys set the Star Wars bar so high that Lucas simply can't follow that up! Certian book writers should be WRITING the scripts with george's input...then the fans MIGHT come back!

    74. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by mhesseltine · · Score: 1

      You bastard!

      --
      Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    75. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      I gotta agree with you about poor Luke...they guy's had only had like 6 months off in a row once since he left tatooine as a kid! I'm surprised we don't have "Luke Skywalker Vacations" to fill in the only gaps in his life.

      At least Star Wars has resisted "time travel" stories!!! Of course having the force takes care of some of those issues by allowing "old ghosts" to return. It is really sad that more wasn't done with "Tales of the Jedi". That series rocked. it was set before even "Kights" so there are no "rules" set yet...and lots more wildly "alien" Jedi's than even in Ep2.

      As for planet-moving that's a fundamental "prop" of the story [like time travel in ST!]...it started with the "Death star" and was even present some of the very first novels..all the way back to "splinter" and "Stars End". I could name at least a dozen other places it's mentioned, "death stars", "planetships", moving planets, and "built" star systems.... sorry, you'll just have to live with it.

    76. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      When Darth Vader rounds up all the remaining Jedi and goes on a hack-n-slash lightsaber fest!

      Actually Speilerg could do a really good job with an evil "Darth Vader" as a "villian hero". I've always wanted to see a movie where Darth gets to be "big, bad, and evil"...just so we can hate him more...he's not really evil enough in the lucas version.

    77. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, especially that "Brain" thingy with its trillions of neurons, neurotransmitters, synapsis' and other 'big' computer related things.

    78. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Durandal64 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because we all know the brain is capable of billions of calculations per second. Oh, wait ...

    79. Re: Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by gidds · · Score: 1
      no good movies made from good novels??? Lord of the Rings *trilogy*...

      Yes, and look how much was cut. How many plot lines were drastically edited or removed. How many characters were elided or removed. How many long scenes and events were reduced to a fraction* or removed entirely. For example:

      • Most of Bilbo's party and speech
      • Much of Gandalf's conversation with Frodo at Bag end (though some of this material is shown briefly elsewhere)
      • Frodo's move to Crickhollow
      • Farmer Maggot
      • The Old Forest
      • Tom Bombadil
      • The barrow wights
      • Glorfindel
      • Most of The Council of Elrond (though again some of the material is shown briefly elsewhere)
      • Much of the Ent storyline and their appearance at Helm's Deep
      • The parley at Orthanc
      • Aragorn's use of the Orthanc palantir
      • Elrond's two sons
      • The Dunedain
      • The Wild Men
      • Denethor's descent
      • Much of Frodo and Sam's time in Mordor; their capture by orcs &c
      • Prince Imrahil
      • The Houses of Healing; many other scenes with Faramir, Eowyn and Eomer
      • The Mouth of Sauron
      • Aragorn & Arwen's wedding; Theoden's funeral
      • Most of the hobbits' return journey, especially the long period at Rivendell
      • The Scouring of the Shire, the Battle of Bywater, and events there over the following year such as Frodo and later Sam becoming mayors
      and loads more. (It's possible a couple of these may appear briefly in the third Extended Edition, but even counting each 4-hour-plus EE -- far more than a normal film is allowed -- there's still a lot missing.)

      Don't get me wrong: I think the films are a magnificent achievement. It's a good adaptation, one which (despite a few crass moments, much simplification, and some unnecessary changes) clearly has a lot of respect for the book, and gets closer to it than most expected, packing in much more of the events, history, background and atmosphere (albeit often obliquely) than you would have thought possible.

      But even with that budget, that amount of time to tell the story, and with that care and love spent in the adaptation, an awful lot ended up in the bin. As arth1 said, there's simply not enough time in a movie. And few adaptations are anywhere near as good as this one.

      [* I didn't say 'decimated' as that means removing a tenth and leaving 9/10ths, not the other way around, of course...]

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    80. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me, but I think you mean PREquel.

    81. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .sregnomraw era snaciremA

    82. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Mr.+Shiny+And+New · · Score: 1

      I agree that KJA uses superweapons way too much. However, the plot-lines of Jedi Acadamy were much simpler than the Zahn books and would probably be more easily made into a movie. I bet you could turn that whole trilogy into one movie, and it'd actually be BETTER for it.

    83. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by necrognome · · Score: 1

      Someone else did the directing in Empire Strikes Back, too.

      --


      Let's get drunk and delete production data!
    84. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by rifter · · Score: 1

      When Darth Vader rounds up all the remaining Jedi and goes on a hack-n-slash lightsaber fest!

      Actually Speilerg could do a really good job with an evil "Darth Vader" as a "villian hero". I've always wanted to see a movie where Darth gets to be "big, bad, and evil"...just so we can hate him more...he's not really evil enough in the lucas version.

      The Jedi killing certainly was a holocaust. But as for Darth Vader not being evil, what the hell? We are talking about Darth Vader, right? I mean, the Darth Vader that slaughtered the Jawas and Sand People (twice now at least!)? The Darth Vader that tortured Leia, Chewbacca, and Han Solo several times and then froze Solo alive, not caring how painful that was or whether it killed him? The Darth Vader that moved through the galaxy like a pestilence, destroying everything in his path? Darth Vader the shatterer of worlds? Darth Vader who tried to kill his own son several times before killing his master? (Ok, granted he gave the son the chance to join him in killing his master twice, but still...)

      What more do you want?

    85. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      No kidding. Boy meets girl who is supposed to be about 12 years older than him, but miraculously looks the same age. Boy is a big whiner, and a murderer. Boy doesn't talk much. Girl still falls in love with Boy.

      Well, it was necessary for the rest of the story, right?

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    86. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .sregnomraw era snaciremA

      Seissup era snaeporue dna.

    87. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by dcollins · · Score: 1

      Star Wars has always been, and always will be, pulp sci-fi, a la Flash Gordon serials from the 30's. Lucas has said time and again the movies were inspired by those old serials, so of course they're going to have a "cartoony" feel to them.

      To quote Zap Brannigan, "I always used to say a lot of things". Lucas is inconsistent and self-serving, and changes his tune to suit his current needs. Sometimes it's based on classic myth if Bill Moyers is around. Other times its old comic books. Then its pulp serials.

      Why did he go back to Episode I and take out Solo's shoot-first policy in the bar scene? Because he's gotten more immature and contemptuous of his work material over time, that's why.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    88. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Joey7F · · Score: 1
      Why did he go back to Episode I and take out Solo's shoot-first policy in the bar scene? Because he's gotten more immature and contemptuous of his work material over time, that's why.


      Why not do that in Episode I. He did the same thing in "A New Hope"

      --Joey
    89. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by xaaronx · · Score: 1

      "Having the power to move an entire planet is just too ridiculous, even for extreme science fiction."

      Except in Moving Mars, although the attraction to that book was the politics as much as the physics. Echoes at times of The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress.

      Yeah I'm offtopic, sorry.

      --
      It's amazing how much "mature wisdom" resembles being too tired. - Robert Anson Heinlein
    90. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by xaaronx · · Score: 1

      "Here's hoping, but I rather doubt there'll be 7-9 sadly. After all, it has been denied for so long, and Star Wars seems to have become "The life and death of Anakin Skywalker" so Ep 6 concludes it I suppose. Who knows?"

      Also, the actors are getting too old to play the principals. Can you picture Han breaking a hip and Luke's arthritis getting so bad he can't hold a lightsaber? I mean, it would have to be at least 2006 or so before they could start shooting the films. It might work out okay artistically if they recast the parts, and they seem to have done well in the prequels in that department, other than Anakin. But could you get people to turn out at the theatre with a different Luke, Han, and Leia?

      On a slightly related note, I am hopeful about a possible fourth Indiana Jones movie. Especially if they get Connery to reprise his role from Last Crusade, though that may be wishful thinking. And Ford has said he'd do another Indiana Jones while refusing to do another Star Wars.

      --
      It's amazing how much "mature wisdom" resembles being too tired. - Robert Anson Heinlein
    91. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by wickedj · · Score: 1

      I hope they don't. They really need to just bury Star Wars while it's still mediocre. There are some really good books in the EU (Extended Universe) but I don't think any are worth a movie except the Thrawn series. But the problem is that even though there are 3 books in the first of that series, I think it would be difficult to make those movies. In any case, having more SW sequels is a bad idea all around. Unless George steps down and they find someone a little better in the direction. Maybe like Peter Jackson from LOTR. Although, a Tim Burton Star Wars sounds really intriguing as well.

    92. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by polaar · · Score: 1

      We started out with "bio armor," remember? It was called wood and leather. We then moved to steel because it was better.
      Yes, but only because dragon scale mail was too expensive ;-)

    93. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by thempstead · · Score: 1
      Everybody keeps mentioning Zahn's Trilogy and here you have mentioned 2 other books after them.

      Forgive my ignorence but I haven't read any of these books and a search on Amazon returns 93 hits for Timothy Zahn ...

      which of his books (the trilogy and the other two) are you refering to?

      Thanks
      Tim

    94. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      ...how about not evil "enough". Vader is an anti-hero. Don't most people root for Vader to be the bad guy and win anyway..just a little bit? I'm looking for an Aeon Flux type story line [short series?] where the good little jedi go up against Darth Vader and... die... Lucas even points out in the movies that Vader normally doesnt' "talk" so much, or make mistakes...he's a bit out-of-character running around "I am your Father"-ing. Vader isn't a "superweapon" kind of guy...but he's not against whipping out the lightsaber and personally destroying a whole city full of people to catch 1 jedi...I want to see THAT vader on screen!

    95. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by ColdGrits · · Score: 2, Informative

      The trilogy is

      The Heir To The Empire
      Dark Force Rising
      The Last Command

      The followon two parter is in

      Spectre Of The Past
      Vision Of The Future

      I strongly recommend all 5 of them in order (and pretty much ignore most of the other Star Wars books which are nowhere near as good - indeed, many are utter crap).

      --
      People should not be afraid of their governments - Governments should be afraid of their people.
    96. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by ColdGrits · · Score: 1

      SLightly OT, but fans of Zahn's excellent 5 Star Wars books may be interested to read (if they don't kjnow this already) that he has a 6th book due out next month, Survivor's Quest - http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnIn quiry.asp?endeca=1&isbn=0345459164&itm=1 has the details [WARNING - do not read the info about the book if youhave not already read the other 5!]

      Given his other 5 books utterly thrash most of the other non-movie books, I'm rather looking forward to this one.

      --
      People should not be afraid of their governments - Governments should be afraid of their people.
    97. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Gongo · · Score: 1

      first off ... Amidala was 14 yrs old in Ep I, Anakin was supposed to be around 10.

      Just because in real life the actors differ about that much, it does not mean the characters they play do.

      Same thing happened in ep IV, where both Luke and Leia are 16 years old (according to the script).

      And secondly,

      I too enjoyed reading the Zahn trilogy (although a translated version, since I am not a native English speaker and the english version is not available over here), but I would doubt that they would measure up on screen. Brilliant books make rarely good movies (for those who read the books).

      (which happened to LOTR for me as well. I found the movies to be a nice 'wow, new zealand looks sooo nice and pure' commercial that was kind of raping the visualisation of the ENTIRE (uncut) story I fantasized when I read the trilogy).

      just my 2 cts :-)

    98. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by leshert · · Score: 1

      It did, but he was still a Padawan. He died in Ep4.

    99. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Merusdraconis · · Score: 1

      I reckon if you give the Star Wars license to anyone who isn't George Lucas they'll do a better job. Hell, if a computer game can come up with a better story than Lucas, Lucas has lost it.

    100. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      Then compare Lucas to Lucas.

      The original epIV cantina scene had some pretty gritty elements to it. It was well done and people loved it, despite obvious science blunders (parsecs anyone?). Compare that to the bar scene near the beginning of epII. The epII scene wasn't nearly as good (even though I happen to think it was one of the better scenes in the movie).

      Even if Lucas had shown no improvement since he worked on epIV the fans would be quite happy. Instead he's show a marked devolution in style, truth and warmth of his characters and even many of his action sequences. He certainly doesn't compare with the best of his peers, but neither does he compare with himself of 20+ years ago no matter what style he believes he's working in.

      TW

    101. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by qwave54 · · Score: 0

      No, no. James Woods should play the ever-cool Talon Kardde. I mean, c'mon, the part was written for him!

    102. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by jonDear · · Score: 1

      "Yvan eht nioj." Flesruoy llik.

    103. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by encebollado · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. Lucas and his Industrial Light and Magic do wonders with CGI but he needs to stick with that. It's obviously his true love because any chance he gets to replace flesh and blood with bytes he does it. Now, in Indiana Jones and the original Star Wars trilogy that didn't seem to be a temptation so he did a decent job with those. CGI just didn't fit with Indiana Jones and wasn't very advanced at the time of the original trilogy.

    104. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Of course it is.

      They just happen to be kind of calculations for which you don't get the results as numbers but actions.

    105. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Biological materials are chemically reactive and structurally weak compared to inert pieces of metal. We started out with "bio armor," remember? It was called wood and leather. We then moved to steel because it was better. ... and then we moved from steel to organic fibers such as nylon and kevlar because they were better. And could be conceivably created by a living organism. There has been plenty of research into spider silk as an armor as well.

      The cells making up biological materials must be permeable by definition in order to function properly.

      The cells themselves maybe, but there is no such requirement for any materials they may create.

    106. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      "All My Stories Must Involve Superweapons Because I'm Not Original In Any Sense At All" J. Anderson? Give me a break.

      Dude, it's Star Wars. Check out ANH and RotJ. The same superweapon, even supersized. Still fun movies. The stakes are high, the risk is high, suspense builds.

      Briefly, Star Wars:
      Ep 1: trade embargoes, blockades, and politics.
      Ep 2: illegal cloning operation investigation
      Ep 4: new superweapon that can destroy any planet/resistance
      Ep 5: The Force
      Ep 6: new superweapon that can destroy any planet/resistance; redemption

      4, 5, and 6 have a premise that you can build an adventure movie around. 1 and 2 don't. Theoretically, there are other plots one could use, but Lucas can't do a good movie that's not a high-stakes adventure.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    107. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Or there will be hell to pay. Nothing else was worth reading.

      I'm largely with you on the relative crap level of SW fiction, but let's not kid ourselves - Zahn isn't very original. The plot elements that weren't lifted directly from the movies were lifted from D&D.

      Kevin Anderson is the only one I've read who actually gets the swashbuckling style of Star Wars, but even he stretches things thin sometimes.

      Here's what I'd like to see: Jedis Gone Wild.

      I mean, let them be Jedi. Size matters not and all that Jazz. They would be so powerful it would be hard to write a good story around it - but that doesn't mean it can't be done or shouldn't be done. With half a billion dollars in projected revenue and 6 billion people on the planet, there's got to be a way to do it right.

      Oh, and if you're a Jedi and you meet the Emporer's personal assistant - kill her. I don't care if she's pretty and has red hair. Kill her. Now. She's evil. Is she dead yet? (just illustrating the plodding nature of Zahn)

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    108. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Durandal64 · · Score: 1

      Are you even familiar with the reasons machines were invented in the first place? A big one is because humans are imprecise. There's a reason we use printers instead of just hand-writing everything.

    109. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by thempstead · · Score: 1
      Many thanks ...


      Tim

    110. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Otherwise why would they say that spider silk is so many times stronger than a steel braided cable of the same thickness?

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    111. Re:Better be Zahn's Trilogy. by purdue_thor · · Score: 1

      >>I challenge you to find a purely biological material that has the specific heat capacity of ordinary steel.

      No sweat. Actually, steel has a low heat capacity - about 40% that of water even. Any organic compound would be higher than steel. Conductivity is another matter...
      >>There's also the question of computing to consider. Our current computers operate on smaller scales than biological computers ever could. If you ever make a transistor out of living cells, let me know.

      Again I disagree. DNA, for example, stores all the information your body needs to recreate itself, and it does it on a scale that's 100 times smaller than the smallest features possible in making computer chips. And if you want to think of the brain as doing calculations, then it's slow but massively parallel so it outpaces even our fastest supercomputers. In fact, the Dept. of Energy doesn't seem to think they'll have a supercomputer that can come close to the human brain until the year 2016.

      Living organisms are pretty fascinating and that's really the reason we're seeing this whole investment in biotechnology.

  2. Oh no! more shit from Lucas to come by cur3 · · Score: 1



    i wait till the 9 dvd pack, star wars forever :D

    --
    how the end always is ...
    1. Re:Oh no! more shit from Lucas to come by diersing · · Score: 1
      contract contains a stipulation that he must also appear in Episodes 7, 8, and 9.

      Seriously, will Mr. Mayhew live to meet these contact demands? Especially when you consider the 20 year (or so) gap between productions of 4-5-6 and 1-2-3.

    2. Re:Oh no! more shit from Lucas to come by fromtheblueline · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just because Mayhew wants his part secured for future episodes does not mean that there will be future episodes. It would be no different then Elijah Wood securing his role as Frodo to keep another actor, say Keanu Reeves or Paul Reubens, from being cast in as Frodo in the future.

    3. Re:Oh no! more shit from Lucas to come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering he is stuffed inside a bear ape suit and all he does is grunt and groan I think they could probably just use his corpse and a tape recording. Knowing Lucas though he will make it totally digital and it will look like crap.

    4. Re:Oh no! more shit from Lucas to come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Good god, Pee-Wee Herman as Frodo? You have an evil mind sir, eeeevillll....

    5. Re:Oh no! more shit from Lucas to come by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1

      Dude - there is no Frodo in the future. The story is over.

    6. Re:Oh no! more shit from Lucas to come by Greedo · · Score: 1

      Would those movies then be "Frodo's Big Adventure" and "Bill and Frodo's Excellent Adventure"?

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    7. Re:Oh no! more shit from Lucas to come by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      Come on... you know if they make 9 movies and release a box set, it will have at least 27 DVDs in the box.

      And a significant % of slashdot readers would actually watch 50 hours of bonus features straight through without sleeping.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    8. Re:Oh no! more shit from Lucas to come by fromtheblueline · · Score: 1

      Yes, the story is over. I was referencing actors in relation to their roles. See: Typecast typecast (t?p?k?st?) tr.v. typecast, typecasting, typecasts 1. To cast in an acting role akin or natural to one's own personality or fitted to one's physical appearance. 2. To assign (a performer) repeatedly to the same kind of part.

    9. Re:Oh no! more shit from Lucas to come by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      Frodo & Sam: WOAH!
      Frodo: Sam, strange things are afoot at the Circle K.
      Sam: Yea...
      (pause looking at eachother)
      Frodo & Sam: Excellent!

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    10. Re:Oh no! more shit from Lucas to come by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      Very true. Also considering in his bio on IMDB it is stated that he charges $20 to sign a picture he supplies, or $15 to sign something or your own. Looks like a classic case of C.Y.A.

    11. Re:Oh no! more shit from Lucas to come by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess going to Mordor could be Sam and Frodo's Bogus Journey...

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    12. Re:Oh no! more shit from Lucas to come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could always take a stab at The Silmarillion as the Prequels

    13. Re:Oh no! more shit from Lucas to come by fopa · · Score: 1

      > his part secured for future episodes

      Actually, there is a difference here.

      If the article said as you did, that he had "secured" his part, then you're right. It means only that if there is a sequel, the studio is forced to give him a role. This would be especially easy if the studio didn't plan to make the sequel.

      However, the article says that he would "be required" to appear in future films. This indicates that the studio put the clause in the contract and that they are at least considering the sequel.

  3. Episode III better rock by mirio · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If Episode III isn't incredible, Mr. Lucas can forget about any other Episodes.

    1. Re:Episode III better rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen to that. So much was left out of the so-called Episodes I and II, that Episode III will have to be 6 1/2 hours long to cover all the stuff that needs to happen before A New Hope.

      Of course, knowing Lucas, what he'll do is utterly ruin IV, V, and VI in order to conform them to the garbage that he's put out thus far. :( To be perfectly honest, he should just put a bunch of actors under contract, hire some decent writers, and just focus on producing a mini-series. At least then maybe his directing will improve...

    2. Re:Episode III better rock by SpaceRook · · Score: 4, Funny

      Special Edition new scenes = sucked.

      Episode 1 = sucked.

      Episode 2 = sucked.

      Episode 3 = ?

    3. Re:Episode III better rock by Outland+Traveller · · Score: 3, Insightful



      I don't know why they even bother to make episode III. Episode II held my "worst current movie" title for a long time, until I saw the Matrix sequels.

      Episode II was so bad, that the only thing that made it watchable was to insert sarcastic comments in the style of MST3K.

      I'm afraid the Star Wars franchaise has now joined the ranks of the James Bond and other movie franchaises, where people go to see it simply as a mindless distraction, and not a single person in the audience expects to take it seriously.

    4. Re:Episode III better rock by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny
      If Episode III isn't incredible, Mr. Lucas can forget about any other Episodes.

      I disagree. No matter how many horrible sequels he puts out, millions of dorks will shell out their money for each one just so see for themselves how bad it is. If they fail to see one, they'll miss out on all the fun when their friends bitch about how bad it was.

    5. Re:Episode III better rock by scalis · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, who could possibly not look forward to another 6 hours of Jar-Jar??

      --

      True ravers don't need drugs
    6. Re:Episode III better rock by bludstone · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Thats, basically, what hes doing with the DVD release. (rumored.)

      heres a list: stolen from http://www.killermovies.com/forums/archive/index.p hp/t-20784

      Remember, these are only rumors.

      Episode IV: A New Hope

      01. The Imperial March has been added to Darth Vader's first appearance on
      Princess Leia's ship.
      02. When Obi-Wan is talking to Luke about his father Anakin's Theme plays
      in the background and then it turns into the Imperial March as he talks
      about Vader.
      03. The lightsaber effects have been redone and the frame jumps of
      lightsabers being turned on has been removed.
      04. There's a new scene which has been shot during the filming of Episode
      III in which the Emperor dissolves the Senate.
      05. In the Cantina, the Duros(green aliens guys) have been replaced with
      Neimoidians and some aliens from the prequels have been added.
      06. The bleeding arm on the floor in the Cantina has been replaced with a
      non-bleeding arm because it's now canon that lightsabers cauterize wounds.
      07. The original shooting scene between Han and Greedo has been restored.
      08. Jabba the Hutt has been given a makeover and Han no longer steps on his
      tale.
      09. In place of R2 wobbling down the stairs to the Falcon's hangar, a CG R2
      navigating the stairs like he does in Attack of the Clones was added.
      10. The white boxes around space ships have been removed and new CG shots
      have been added.
      11. The scene of the Falcon being chased by the two Star Destroyers was
      modified. The Falcon now does spinning moves, avoiding the Star Destroyers'
      fire.
      12. When the Death Star destroys Alderaan there's a new scene of Yoda's
      reaction to the disturbance in the Force that is created by all those
      deaths and then it cuts to Obi-Wan reacting to it as well.
      13. The Dianoga has gotten a CG makeover and were are now able to see more
      of the creature.
      14. The Death Star's paneling and computers have been slightly altered to
      show similar displays to those in the prequels.
      15. The words "Tractor Beam" with Aurebesh lettering.
      16. More stormtroopers have been added to the Death Star.
      17. Temuera Morrison's voice is being recorded for use with all the
      stormtroopers.
      18. The Obi-Wan/Vader duel has been spruced up. It is much more epic and
      there is much more movement. A modified version of Duel of the Fates is
      being considered for the scene.
      19. The Death Star plans that are taken from R2 have been updated. When the
      Rebels are reviewing the Death Star plans they look similar to the plans we
      see in Attack of the Clones.
      20. The Death Star battle is much more epic with more Tie Fighters and more
      Rebels being blown to bits. We get to see old Naboo starfighters being used
      by the Rebels.
      21. There's a new scene(shot during Episode III) where Darth Vader goes to
      Coruscant and lands his ship in the same building Count Dooku does at the
      end of Attack of the Clones. Except now the building is all fixed up and it
      is now Palpatine's palace. He meets with Palpatine to ask for forgiveness
      for his failure and inform him of a new potential who is strong in the Force.
      22. Chewbacca now gets a medal.

      Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back

      01. The taun-tauns are now CG.
      02. The battle of Hoth is much more epic. We see the Imperial ships land on
      Hoth and release AT-ATs. The AT-ATs have been sped up a bit. There's a
      ground battle between the Rebel soldiers and stormtroopers featuring new
      ships and vehicles.
      03. Temuera Morrison's voice is being recorded for the older Boba Fett and
      all the stormtroopers.
      04. The white boxes around space ships have been removed.
      05. The slug monster is CG.
      06. Ian McDiarmid has refilmed scenes as the Emperor. The conversations
      between Vader and Palpatine is now longer and features a few connections to
      the prequels.
      07. Yoda's face is now animated in CG allowing more _expression of emotions
      yet his movements remain the same. Also tw

      --

      no .sig
    7. Re:Episode III better rock by UrgleHoth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I saw 4-6 in the theaters, watched them many times over again through the years. I saw 1 in the theater once. Have not watched it again. Have not seen 2. I've mostly lost interest in whatever happens next, but I'd bet money that 3 is going to suck donkey balls (or if it were a stock, I'd short it)

      Troll me if you will, but there are lots of peeps out there who like(d) SW feel the same way.

      --

      Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
    8. Re:Episode III better rock by Intocabile · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I know this... is it Profit!?

    9. Re:Episode III better rock by gamgee5273 · · Score: 4, Funny

      So, you're saying I'll see you in line, eh?

    10. Re:Episode III better rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I insist that Chewbacca is at least as annoying as Jar-Jar.

    11. Re:Episode III better rock by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 4, Funny

      My guess is that Jar Jar is destined to die on Alderaan.

      I'd love to see an extra scene in Episode 4 where Jar Jar looks to the heavens and sees the Death Star. And just as the laser fires his last words are "Mesa thinks this is very bom-bad".

      (earth shattering)KABOOM!!

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    12. Re:Episode III better rock by Luyseyal · · Score: 3, Funny

      I saw Episode 2 at the Discount Cinema on dollar movie night (Tuesdays) just to stick it to Lucas.

      Yoda kicking ass was worth a dollar, but I'd've paid full price to see Boba Fett torture and kill Anakin and Amidala. Twice.

      Fuck continuity.
      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    13. Re:Episode III better rock by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      Episode 1 = sucked.
      Episode 2 = sucked.
      Episode 3 = ?

      "What part of this progression eludes you?" --G'Kar

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    14. Re:Episode III better rock by Hays · · Score: 1

      07. The original shooting scene between Han and Greedo has been restored.

      Thank god. The special edition version is just ludicrous. How does the bounty hunter miss!?

    15. Re:Episode III better rock by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      Oh it will be incredible all right - it will be incredibly bad.

      Episode 1: Action figures, video games, PROFIT! Kid appeal = $$$ Plot = ??? Midiclohorineienesiens??? WTF, 'nuff said. At least it had some good lines... "Jar Jar leads to annoying the audience, annoying the audience leads to bad reviews, bad reviews are the path to the dark side! I sense much Jar Jar in this film."

      Episode 2: Hours of suckyness almost redeemed by a kick ass yoda scene at the end. Despite everything George has done to ruin this series, Yoda still rules. Anakin is now played by an adult actor who amazingly has the same acting ability (ahem, or lack thereof) as the child in Episode 1. "You are in my very soul, tormenting me." "You to. Shut up and just pour hot grits on her OR SOMETHING. A daytime soap opera screenwriter could have written better love scenes."

      Episode 3: More of what you love from Episodes 1 and 2... Loads of Jar Jar, another extended scene that will be made into a video game. Maybe Anakin will get mutilated early on and we won't have to hear him spout any more lovey-dovey crap like he was reading it out of a school textbook. Hey, at least my expectations for Episode 3 can't get much lower...

      Of course, George Lucas could just be testing a new anti-piracy measure - make the film suck so bad no one wants to pirate it.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    16. Re:Episode III better rock by SpaceTaxi · · Score: 1

      Episode II sucked so bad that my subconcious had me fooled that before reading this article I thought had already seen Episode III

      (it sucked too.)

    17. Re:Episode III better rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of those ideas are awesome. Some are stupid (all the stormtroopers may have been clones in Ep. 2, but you'd think that after the galaxy became militeristic and all, the empire would recruit soldiers from anywhere, so by this time they wouldn't all be clones). Some of those ideas just make me want to punch something. Many of them seem to be attempting to push episode 1 and 2's shortcomings onto the original 3 films, and that just raises the bile in my stomach.

    18. Re:Episode III better rock by octal666 · · Score: 1

      I've read all this before, in some star wars films forums, but, last I check, it were all rumours made up by fans, nothing official, or even credible.

      --
      DON'T PANIC
    19. Re:Episode III better rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If jarjar dies in ep3, it will automagically be considered 10x better than ep1 and 2

    20. Re:Episode III better rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, you've got your movies mixed up, it's "It's a unix system. I know this!" Kindly pay attention in moviequoting class.

    21. Re:Episode III better rock by builderbob_nz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well if only one of these rumors can be granted, then I want the ewok music back. From a musicians perspective that was much better than the crap they used in the re-release.

      --

      Karma? Hey I just call it as I see it.
    22. Re:Episode III better rock by srleffler · · Score: 1

      The stormtroopers were always supposed to be clones.

    23. Re:Episode III better rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Episode 3 = PROFIT!

      SCNR :)

    24. Re:Episode III better rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you going to do? Cry about it in your room all day?

      What the fuck does this even mean?

      He has more money than God, he can do whatever he wants.

    25. Re:Episode III better rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Episode 1 = $431m (US-only)

      Episode 2 = $310m (US-only)

      Episode 3 = another couple dumptrucks full of cash.

      Where is Lucas' incentive to stop producing sucky SW movies?

    26. Re:Episode III better rock by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I totally agree. I tried to watch Attack of the Clones the other day on HBO and couldn't sit through it. The dialogue is just inane. I don't think story writing is Lucas's forte. He's a great scene builder. He can create the 'feeling' of a 'rebellion' or an 'evil empire' or a 'mysterious jedi cult' but the fact that Mark Hamill could star as Luke Skywalker and not completely ruin the first three movies means there was no acting involved in playing the part. No acting was required because there was no *character development*. Those movies were a plot centric amusement park ride, a cool universe you could imagine yourself in. Nobody in Star Wars 4,5,6 changed at all really if you think about it. But the universe and the ride was artfully done and I loved those movies.

      Obi Wan's character in Episode I was probably the worst thing about the movie other than Jar Jar Binks. The guy should have been identifiable as the same Obi Wan we all knew. He was just Qui Gon Jin's 'Igor-like' monk.

      In AOTC, Anakin is a badly acted whining little baby. Lucas should have hired a real writer to develop him into a believeable Darth Vader precursor. Anakin, being so important in all the movies really needs to be real.

      Lucas needs to make it less gawdy. The scenes in Mos Eisley were spare - almost desolate, which is what you would expect for a desert planet in the middle of nowhere. Then Lucas adds extra computer generated stuff to it. The desert planet in the middle of nowhere that was so boring Luke couldn't wait to leave now seemed like a happening place which detracted from the movie.

      The battles in episodes I and II are dazzlingly detailed. Rather than showing all that detail all the time just because he can, he needs to stop and consider what would actually be there and leave most of the things out that don't have a purpose. Less detail is sometimes more realistic IMO.

      --

      Eat at Joe's.

    27. Re:Episode III better rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You honestly thought ep II was worse than ep I? Why? Personally, for me it goes
      ep1 ep2 ep4 ep6 ep5

      Imho ep2 was not much worse than ep4. People tend to forget ep4 really wasn't all that great scriptwise. You should rewatch ep4 with an open mind. If it was released today (even with the special effects redone), people would say it sucks.

      And come on, you gotta admit, natalie portman is at least as nice to watch as carrie fisher, right?

    28. Re:Episode III better rock by ArmenTanzarian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Too soon to tell, I think all the stuff with Hayden Christenson is stupid as well as the redoing of the voices of the Stormtroopers. Taking out other people's contributions to the legend is wrong for the sake of the art and mean-spirited.

      Why would the spirit of Padme be at the end also? I thought only Jedi masters could do this before they finally joined with the force.

      Changing the music also seems like a bad idea, it again distorts the orginal art and flow of the movie. You can upgrade sound _quality_, but leave the original tracks alone.

      Come to think of it, I'll stick with my original letterbox VHS until they disintegrate. The originals were perfect, including their imperfections, it's part of what made it an incredible film. Lucas changing the films to support his lackluster plotlines and mediocre characters from the first few movies is a horrid affront to the fans and his own work.

      It was freakin' Lucas (as South Park pointed out) who lead the charge to keep movies from being colorized. I wish he could apply the same logic here.

    29. Re:Episode III better rock by jafuser · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Meesa thinkin' dat disa gonna be muy muy bom-bad."

      I kind of like JarJar, but if this makes a lot of geeks happy and shuts them up, maybe it'll be worth it =P

      --
      Please consider making an automatic monthly recurring donation to the EFF
    30. Re:Episode III better rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, that listing of episodes should have < in between, like this:

      ep1 < ep2 < ep4 < ep6 < ep5

      Dumbass for not previewing that I am.

    31. Re:Episode III better rock by WNight · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I actually thought the Yoda fight scene was the weakest in the movie. Well, the whole movie was so weak it's hard to pick the weakest, but...

      Yoda should have been an old master, using tiny movements and his wits to beat the opponent, instead of acting like a happy-fun-ball.

      When I heard he was going to fight I pictured this old kung-foo movie I watched once where the old master defeats like three trained guys, not by being stronger or anything, but by not being where they had expected, moving just enough so they'd miss and then he'd pull them off-balance with a little tug and kick them on their way past. Didn't even break a sweat. That was class. Yoda the flubber-muppet was just sad.

    32. Re:Episode III better rock by Golgofrinchian · · Score: 1

      Sounds great,

      Some might say that the rework ruins the original film. Lucas himself says that if he had the technology then that he has now he would have never done them that way. These are some great story fixing things, and I look forward to the DVD release. I just wonder if they will have a "old-School" version for the purists, like they did with the VHS tape release a few years ago.

      --
      I'm pining for the fjords...
    33. Re:Episode III better rock by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "What do you guys think?"

      Nothing really made me grimace too hard.

      Hmm.

      I have to weigh a couple of things here. On one hand, I think it's kinda cool that he's going in and fixing inconsistencies etc, and making the movies more fluid and interactive with each other. Technologically, it's pretty cool that all this can be done. But.. damn.. it's George Lucas. I'm slowly growing concerned that these ideas that seem cool on paper will feel gimmicky when they're actually released. Updating the graphics of the Death Star, for example, is a nice touch. But are they going to go nuts with it? Lots of spinny flashing things that really wouldn't make sense to show to a bunch of pilots recieving their orders?

      Eh. I dunno. I'm willing to be open minded about it, but at the same time, I'm not willing to instantly throw all my money at it.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    34. Re:Episode III better rock by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      I had thought that when Yoda finally got around to fighting in a movie, he would use force telekinesis a lot more than he did. I thought that he would end up using the force to control a floating light saber, and not wielding it himself.

    35. Re:Episode III better rock by dasmegabyte · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Agreed. I hated Episode 1. I hated Episode 2. I have even extended my hate to Return of the Jedi.

      And yet, I will see Episode 3, and I proudly GM the Star Wars d20 RPG (in a campaign based around the Old Republic era seen in KotOR, thus preventing the players from having to meet up with any damn gungans). If they make a sequel trilogy, even if it isn't based on Zahn's great books, I will go see it. Though I think they can't help but drawn on these guys...come one, Luke and Mara Jade? The tsalmiri? Leia hiding out on a planet of violent assassins, playing up her father's infamy? Even Lucas can't deny that's good stuff!

      What can I say? Star Wars is a pleasant fantasy realm that cannot be stifled even by the ineptitude of its creator. I *like* the Star Wars universe, midichlorian bullshit and all.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    36. Re:Episode III better rock by EulerX07 · · Score: 1

      This isn't too bad. If the box set can contain the THX version of the originals (without the SE modificaitons) it will be much better.

    37. Re:Episode III better rock by miTTio · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yub-yub!

    38. Re:Episode III better rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When I first saw Star Wars (in 1979), I thought the Stormtroopers were supposed to be robots. (How else could they be such horrible shots?)

      The thing that confused me was when Han and Luke knocked out the scanner team and emerged in their stormtrooper shells -- "How the hell did they gut those robots so fast?" I thought to myself.

      Anonymous Kev
      Proudly posting as AC since 1997

    39. Re:Episode III better rock by harborpirate · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ug, how did all these rediculous rumors get modded up?

      First off, for those of you hoping the battle scenes will be updated, with more vehicles etc - don't hold your breath.

      Secondly, the removal of matte lines? You can forget about that one. They had the chance to do that in the last special editions, and they didn't. They chose to put in crappy extra scenes and wreck some of the current ones. Plan on those black lines with the Rancor monster still being there.

      And you arent' going to be able to go back and forth between CG and "real" Yodas, R2D2s, Obi-Wans, Vaders, cantina aliens, taun-tauns, ewoks, Jabbas, etc, etc, etc - without disjointing the movie. I'm sorry, but even as good as CG is these days, it still isn't perfect. Maybe you recall, in the Matrix trilogy, Neos fight against the zillion Smiths? Yeah, take a look at Neos clothing during the fight, tell me if you think it looks realistic the whole time...

      Here's what I'd like to see:

      Release the original movies, on DVD, with no extra special crap whatsoever. No CG. Release them exactly as they played when they first came out.

      Release them as they were, and leave them alone. If the old movies don't match the new, its George's fault. He knew when he created "prequels" that he needed to maintain continuity with his other movies. "Fixing" the old movies to match the new ones is wrong.

      I'm convinced that the more Lucas tries to "fix" his original triology, the worse it'll get.

      --
      // harborpirate
      // Slashbots off the starboard bow!
    40. Re:Episode III better rock by visgoth · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I remember reading somewhere way back, about a year before ep2 came out that Lucas said somthing to the effect of ".. and you will see why Yoda is the Jedi master.". The first thought that came to my mind was "oh shit... he's gonna have Yoda bounce around like some sort of hyperactive superball".

      Sadly my fears were proven correct. That whole fight is a total farce. Nowhere before did Yoda move in any sort of rapid manner, its been established that he's a slow moving little guy. To have him suddenly break out the kung-fu (ugh those stances he assumed were cheesy) and fly around screaming was so utterly ridiculous both me and my brother burst out laughing when we saw it in the theater.

      He absolutely should have moved like the parent suggested. I would have gone so far as to have him beat down Saruman unarmed using a fighting style something like Akido.

      --
      My patience is infinite, my time is not.
    41. Re:Episode III better rock by pyros · · Score: 5, Funny
      Yoda should have been an old master, using tiny movements and his wits to beat the opponent, instead of acting like a happy-fun-ball.

      Hey! Do not taunt happy-fun-ball!

    42. Re:Episode III better rock by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 1
      Is nothing on this earth holy?

      We see an aged Jar Jar, who is now the leader of the Gungans, on Naboo celebrating with the people of Naboo and the Gungans.

      For god's sake, JarJar was the one thing I hated the most out of the new movies. Don't trash the origionals by bringing him here as well.

    43. Re:Episode III better rock by Christopher+Whitt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Release them as they were, and leave them alone. If the old movies don't match the new, its George's fault. He knew when he created "prequels" that he needed to maintain continuity with his other movies. "Fixing" the old movies to match the new ones is wrong.

      Dude. I understand your appreciation for the original cuts, but get a grip. They're just movies. And they're Lucas' movies, at that. He can do what he wants with them. Vote with your wallet.

      Christopher

    44. Re:Episode III better rock by aszoth · · Score: 1

      It's said that "a piece of art is never finished it is simply abanddoned." I think that's Lucas' take on the whole thing. Not posative but I think he quoted some one as saying that in one of the interviews he was in.

    45. Re:Episode III better rock by damien_kane · · Score: 3, Funny

      Another way to look at it...

      Special Edition new scenes = poison...
      Episode 1 = poison...
      Episode 2 = poison...
      Episode 3 = ... tastyfish?

    46. Re:Episode III better rock by visgoth · · Score: 1

      There was a Star Wars novel about some of the characters in the cantina and Greedo's backstory was among them. He's not really an experienced bounty hunter. Rather, he's a n00b with a gun and doesn't have a clue at all about the business of bounty hunting.

      --
      My patience is infinite, my time is not.
    47. Re:Episode III better rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Where is Lucas' incentive to stop producing sucky SW movies?

      if the trend of diminishing returns sticks with this movie, then there is an incentive for him to stop.

    48. Re:Episode III better rock by darth_MALL · · Score: 0

      According to the Flanneled One, the Original cuts are dead and will not be released again check it out: http://www.originaltrilogy.com/

    49. Re:Episode III better rock by the_1000th_Monkey · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Episode 1 = sucked.

      Episode 2 = sucked.

      Episode 3 = PROFIT!!

      --
      where'd my typewriter go?
    50. Re:Episode III better rock by jostallin · · Score: 1

      But how come they come in different height/proportion? Genetic 'fuzziness' after too many copies!? Maybe the Kaminoans are destroyed and the Republic has to start impressing men [sic] into Stormtrooper duty.

    51. Re:Episode III better rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which explains the "pretty short for a stormtrooper" remark that Leia makes ...

    52. Re:Episode III better rock by mgg4 · · Score: 1

      I kind of like JarJar, but if this makes a lot of geeks happy and shuts them up, maybe it'll be worth it.

      If not Jar-Jar, it would be some other sappy character that everyone thinks is funny, but loves to hate. I say, "What's wrong with Jar-Jar? Meesa thinkin' he be muy muy hilarious. Even so, meesa mostly not understandin' what heesa sayin'."

      Also, if you believe the rumors, he's still around in DVD release of Episode VI, as the leaders of the Gungans. The rumors (see earlier post in this topic) say he will be seen celebrating on Naboo after the Empire is overthrown at the end of the movie. Sorry to disappoint those who would love to see Jar-Jar get whacked!

      --
      -- This space for rent.
    53. Re:Episode III better rock by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 2, Funny

      >>The rumors (see earlier post in this topic) say he will be seen celebrating on Naboo after the Empire is overthrown at the end of the movie. Sorry to disappoint those who would love to see Jar-Jar get whacked!

      I forgot about that rumor. You're right.

      But it would still be a cool scene, looking up at the Death Star from the planet surface.

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    54. Re:Episode III better rock by ObiWanKenblowme · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I disagree, and along with the Matrix I think these are being subjected to the kind of pile-on-and-pick-at-its-faults mentality everywhere these days.

      Now I won't claim that it's ground-breaking cinema, but I definitely thought EpII was entertaining, for what it was. Maybe 20 years of buildup have obscured the fact that a lot of the OT was badly acted as well, with hoakey dialogue.

      The guy should have been identifiable as the same Obi Wan we all knew.
      One paragraph after you complain about a lack of character development, you complain that Obi-Wan isn't the same 40 or 50 years earlier? Find me someone who acts the same at 20 as they do at 60 and I'll show you someone with some big developmental or emotional problems.

      The scenes in Mos Eisley were spare...
      I've never heard this from anywhere "official," but my take was that during the prequels galactic culture is at its peak, everything is new and bright and vibrant. But after 30 or so years of war and opression, things don't look so nice and clean anymore. Especially in the backwater places, where most of the original trilogy took place. We never see Naboo or Coruscant during IV, V, and VI, which is where all the gawdiness was coming from.

      Sorry to go off on a rant, but I'd rather try and focus on the good points, rather than pick apart any movie that comes out because it doesn't meet my expectations.

      --
      Obvious exits are NORTH, SOUTH, and DENNIS.
    55. Re:Episode III better rock by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      You try making an army of exactly identicle people with a tiny budget ($9,000,000.00 (US) in 1977 dollars). They were lucky they could manufacture enough cheap plastic sets of stormtrooper armor!

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    56. Re:Episode III better rock by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      >>He can do what he wants with them. Vote with your wallet.

      Please mod parent as insightful.

      --
      Huh?
    57. Re:Episode III better rock by clem · · Score: 3, Funny

      Meanwhile on the Millennium Falcon...

      "I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if a jibbering idiot suddenly squeeled in terror and was suddenly silenced."

      --
      Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
    58. Re:Episode III better rock by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      02. The Rancor is CG and looks disgusting as ever.

      I doubt it, the Rancor, and the score of other aliens looked so great because they were real, physical objects. Lucas's idea of CG is to turn everything into a cartoon.


      --
      In London? Need a Physics Tutor?

      American Weblog in London

    59. Re:Episode III better rock by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      No kidding. I couldn't help but wonder why he lost other than the script demanded it. He should have been able to throw off that falling collumn without a problem. After all, he tells Luke that the size of an object doesn't matter.


      --
      In London? Need a Physics Tutor?

      American Weblog in London

    60. Re:Episode III better rock by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Oh, well, if Outland Traveller didn't like it, then I guess there's no point in making any more.

      Nevermind that TPM and AOTC brought in a combined $740 million just in US domestic distribution. Even if Ep III makes half of what AOTC made, it'll still gross $155 million, still a respectable amount.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    61. Re:Episode III better rock by jostallin · · Score: 1

      I was actually trying to explain away the discrepancy. Did I win a Marvel No-Prize?
      Refer as necessary to ST:TNG "Up The Long Ladder".
      Maybe the Mariposans and the Kaminoans use compatible technology.

    62. Re:Episode III better rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right on. I hated that the matrix grew a big hairy vag.

    63. Re:Episode III better rock by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna get flamed to hell and back but... remember Mr. Miyagi fighting? Something like that (only better done).

      (Or, of course, Drunken Master... altough he did get into Happy Fun Ball mode at times).

    64. Re:Episode III better rock by Tweaker_Phreaker · · Score: 1

      You forgot these:

      ? = will suck

      Episode 7 = will suck

      Episode 8 = will suck

      Episode 9 = will suck

      George Lucas = should retire and let someone with talent handle his business

    65. Re:Episode III better rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Episode 3 = profit ???

    66. Re:Episode III better rock by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2, Funny

      And last but not least... all weapons have been digitally replaced with walkie-talkies!!

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    67. Re:Episode III better rock by Rary · · Score: 1
      07. The original shooting scene between Han and Greedo has been restored.

      There you have it. Proof positive that this is a fan-created list, not a Lucas-created list. There is no way Lucas would ever admit that one of his previous "enhancements" was a mistake and should be removed.

      Just give me the original movies on DVD. I'd even like the option to view Ep. IV in its original original format (ie. without the "A New Hope" subtitle) as a special feature.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    68. Re:Episode III better rock by Snodgrass · · Score: 1

      If the "Han shoots first" rumor turns out to be true, then I might just fork over the cash for those. That scene alone has kept me from buying the "special edition" versions.

    69. Re:Episode III better rock by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      Well, the sword fighting in Episode 1 was better than anything I've ever seen in movies. Those guys really went at it with Darth Maul.

      The fights in episode 2 looked a lot more like the lightsaber duels of the original trilogy. I'm hoping to see more bad-ass light-saber action in episode 3.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    70. Re:Episode III better rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This list of changes has been circulating on movie message boards (and has been posted as news on a few sites) for quite some time. Most who follow Star Wars news tend to agree that it is fake.

    71. Re:Episode III better rock by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      They stopped throwing away the defects to save on cost ;-)

      Though, I remember that Leigh commented that Luke was too short to be a Storm Trooper.

      This does seem continuous because Bobba Fett is dressed a LOT like storm troopers and stays masked just as they do. If he took off his mask, everyone would know that he is a clone.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    72. Re:Episode III better rock by lylfyl · · Score: 1

      I'll probably get flamed as an apologist on this, ( maybe rightfully so), but here's my take on it.

      If Yoda had been using minimal/aikido-type movements, it visually would have been boring. Count Dooku/Christopher Lee is an old man as well. The fights would have been no better than the Alec Guiness v. Darth Vader bout. Any subtlety in their fencing style would have been lost. Face Yoda against a more energetic opponent, (oh say Darth Maul's even-more-eviler twin) and then he could play the lethargic master.

      That being said, the "let's not use our telekinetics and settle this by saber" was pretty sad. Since Yoda levitated his saber, I expected him to attack with flying sabers, nearby pillars and rocks, all while sitting at a safe distance drinking a cup of tea.

    73. Re:Episode III better rock by denks · · Score: 3, Funny

      While Lucas is at it destroying the movies, how about Jar Jar turning to the dark side in Ep 4.
      We get a scene of Darth Vader telling Jar Jar to lash out with his anger and Jar Jar goes ballistic and runs around killing anything he can get his hands on.
      Then, in ROTJ, when we see the Emperor, it is actually Jar Jar wearing a hooded robe, he is the new emperor
      Me Sa thinks you should lash out with your anger. Then me sa thinks your transition to the dark side will be complete.
      Honestly, what better way to make Luke lash out than hearing that whiny voice!

      I guess with more ewoks at least we get to see more of them die.

      --

      I am Monkey, the Great Sage, equal of heaven!
    74. Re:Episode III better rock by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Maybe all stormtroopers were originally intended to be clones, but it is canon now that they are not clones. Though I suppose there may be some 60-year old clone instructors over at Carida (Imperial Academy) during Ep. 4-6.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    75. Re:Episode III better rock by lacrymology.com · · Score: 1

      "Special Edition new scenes = sucked.

      Episode 1 = sucked.

      Episode 2 = sucked.

      Episode 3 = ?"

      My guess is that ? == profit.
      -m

      --

      #
      # Modus Ponens
      #
    76. Re:Episode III better rock by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      Worst. Rumor. Ever.

      However, Lucas, if this is true, FORGET ABOUT IT!!!! LET IT REST!!!!!!

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    77. Re:Episode III better rock by lylfyl · · Score: 1
      Obi Wan's character in Episode I was probably the worst thing about the movie other than Jar Jar Binks. The guy should have been identifiable as the same Obi Wan we all knew. He was just Qui Gon Jin's 'Igor-like' monk.

      Well, I didn't expect him to be the same 40-some years prior. He was still an apprentice in Ep I. of course, watching your teacher die, then trying to train some whiny prodigy and then watching him turn into an arrogant punk who will eventually try to kill you, just might make you become a bit more cautious...

      In AOTC, Anakin is a badly acted whining little baby. Lucas should have hired a real writer to develop him into a believeable Darth Vader precursor. Anakin, being so important in all the movies really needs to be real.

      I seem to be one of the few people who didn't hate Christensen's acting in Ep2. Why do people think they should like Anakin at all? Considering Luke was a whiny punk in the beginning of ANH, and Anakin was a whiner in Ep 1, I expected Anakin to continue this trend in Ep 2. After all, he's destined to be Lord Vader, with the habit of killing underlings when he doesn't get his way. The only reason Vader doesn't SOUND whiny is he's got that cool James Earl Jones voice modulator.

      Everybody's got their own opinion...

    78. Re:Episode III better rock by bar-agent · · Score: 1
      Good list.

      Ep. 4

      Dissolving of the Senate: Cool.

      Original shooting scene: About damn time.

      Yoda reacting to Alderaan: Bad. Means Yoda gets introduced before the story is ready to handle him.

      Chewie gets a medal: Appropriate.

      More TIEs and stormtroopers: Excellent. The Death Star was seriously understaffed in the original.

      Ep. 5

      Vader orders C-3PO to Chewie's cell: Nice touch.

      Ep. 6

      Vicious Ewoks: Can Ewoks be redeemed? I think so.

      Hayden Christenson: This is the correct thing to do, even if it does strike one as Orwellian to begin with.

      Vader's death soliloquy: No! Bad! The original makes his redemption clear enough, and leaves Luke as his own man. If Vader tells Luke to rebuild the Jedi, then filial duty kicks in and weakens his subsequent soul-searching and independent decision-making. He stays the Son, instead of becoming the Man.

      Jar-Jar and Watto: Would they even be alive? They had no role in the middle trilogy, so it would be out of place to just drop them in for one scene (unless they were presented as extras during the celebration montage).

      All:

      Clone stormtroopers: Sorry, no dice. Stormtroopers are not clones. This is canon.

      Lightsaber cauterization, Aurebesh lettering, etc.: Good. I like numerous, small bug-fixes for the sake of consistency and correctness.

      Tie-ins to earlier trilogy: Acceptable.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    79. Re:Episode III better rock by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Actually, those changes all sounded pretty decent to me, so long as they're done well and there's no shiny cartoon aliens amongst the good old make-up aliens. And han better shoot first.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    80. Re:Episode III better rock by Temsi · · Score: 1

      Come to think of it, I'll stick with my original letterbox VHS until they disintegrate.

      Or... do what I did... get the LaserDiscs with the original version, and make your own DVDs.

      As a video professional (well, part time pro), I was able to make a pretty good looking 16:9 transfer... which actually shocked me considering the quality of LD isn't that great (it's still an analog composite signal, with a relatively low 480x420 resolution approximately).
      For sure, LD is much better than VHS, but not nearly as good as DVD.

      I've seen some home-brew LD-2-DVD copies floating around, but most of them look like shit, and on some, the encoder didn't even bother removing the 3:2 pulldown from the LD cap... so I decided to make my own...
      Sadly, it will probably be the only DVD I will ever own of the original versions of these movies, as Lucas seems hell-bent on destroying his own legacy and refuses to release anything but the special edition. ("special" as in "Cameron Diaz' brother in There's Something About Mary...")

      --
      -- This sig for rent.
    81. Re:Episode III better rock by alib001 · · Score: 1

      Yes indeed. I haven't seen Episode II and I'm not bothered in the slightest.

      I think the saying goes something like: Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.

      Personally, I'm waiting for advances in technology to make it possible (i.e. in terms of cost) for SW fans to remake the earlier episodes and restore anything else Lucas screws around with.

    82. Re:Episode III better rock by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      > Too soon to tell, I think all the stuff with Hayden Christenson is stupid as well as the redoing of the voices of the Stormtroopers. Taking out other people's contributions to the legend is wrong for the sake of the art and mean-spirited.

      --I'll agree with you there. Couldn't the original extras/voices in the SW films sue Lucas for doing this? He's actually screwing with people who should get proper credit (and their "15 minutes of fame") for being in the original version of the film. "Dude, I was a stormtrooper in teh original, until that bastard Lucas edited me out!"

      > Lucas changing the films to support his lackluster plotlines and mediocre characters from the first few movies is a horrid affront to the fans and his own work.

      --So was AOTC... :( Saw it once, hope to never have to endure it again. Not even Natalie Portman's Petrified Nipples could save that pile of trash.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    83. Re:Episode III better rock by UserGoogol · · Score: 1

      Well, although I doubt that the Storm Troopers were always meant to be clones, you can easily attribute this to the Empire deciding at some point in the 25 year period between Ep2 and Ep4 to have clones of more than one person. That is, some were clones of Jango, some were clones of different people.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    84. Re:Episode III better rock by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      > Nobody in Star Wars 4,5,6 changed at all really if you think about it.

      --I completely disagree with you here. If you don't think any of the characters changed between 4-6, you need to sit down with a SW nerd for a couple of hours and get EDUCATED.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    85. Re:Episode III better rock by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      > When I heard he was going to fight I pictured this old kung-foo movie I watched once where the old master defeats like three trained guys, not by being stronger or anything, but by not being where they had expected, moving just enough so they'd miss and then he'd pull them off-balance with a little tug and kick them on their way past. Didn't even break a sweat.

      --You and I (and others) can appreciate the finer points of kung-fu fighting, especially when it is done with Elegance and a minimalist style - that is true mastery of the Art. Unfortunately this kind of Art is completely beyond George Lucas's ken. To him, it has to be Big, Flashy, and Exaggerated.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    86. Re:Episode III better rock by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1
      One paragraph after you complain about a lack of character development, you complain that Obi-Wan isn't the same 40 or 50 years earlier? Find me someone who acts the same at 20 as they do at 60 and I'll show you someone with some big developmental or emotional problems.

      It is true that people change, but parts also stay the same. Obi Wan in Ep 1 seemed like a completely different person than the Obi Wan of Ep 4,5,6. I would have liked to see circumstances change him from being one way to being like he is when he is older.

      I've never heard this from anywhere "official," but my take was that during the prequels galactic culture is at its peak, everything is new and bright and vibrant. But after 30 or so years of war and opression, things don't look so nice and clean anymore. Especially in the backwater places, where most of the original trilogy took place. We never see Naboo or Coruscant during IV, V, and VI, which is where all the gawdiness was coming from.
      When I was talking about Mos Eisley being spare I was talking about Ep 4. I was complaining, not about the Mos Eisley of Ep 1, but about the changes to the Mos Eisley of Ep 4.
      --

      Eat at Joe's.

    87. Re:Episode III better rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Noob or not, my four year old nephew could have wasted Solo from that distance. WITH THE BLAST SHIELD DOWN!

    88. Re:Episode III better rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not me. Episode 1 sucked hard enough that I've never seen Episode 2. And from hearing the "It's worse than episode 1" reviews, I'm not interested in episode 3 either.

      If Lucas dies, or is otherwise rendered impotent regarding the SW franchise and (strong and) the Tim Zahn Admiral Thrawn books are used for the story, I'd see episodes 7-9. Otherwise, I'm not interested.

    89. Re:Episode III better rock by antin · · Score: 1

      Tell me about it - that Yoda scene was the sort of thing you would expect from a parody... Especially as at the end he hunches back over his crutch.

      If they really wanted a fast fight scene, it would be better if he just threw his sword around with the force - they could have had his sword make all the same movements as it did (essentially the same fight) but show Yoda in deep concentration using the force to move it.

      I even heard that the CGI guys for the movie hated the Yoda fight so much that on their own time they came up with a few alternate fight scenes for Lucas - but in his infinite 'wisdom', he remained true to his 'vision'.

    90. Re:Episode III better rock by boutell · · Score: 1

      Wrong? "Wrong" is a strong word to apply to what an artist decides to do to his own work. Dumb, I'll go along with. "Very dumb," even. Possibly even "approaching idiotic."

      --
      Check out the Apostrophe open-source CMS: http://www.apostrophenow.com/
    91. Re:Episode III better rock by myklgrant · · Score: 1

      And I'll be damned if I am going to wait three years between episodes again. LOTR - one per year. Matrix - two in one year.

    92. Re:Episode III better rock by jostallin · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're from different upgrade cycles. Every size/shape of Stormtrooper represents the lowest-bid clone from each particular manufacturer.

    93. Re: Episode III better rock by gidds · · Score: 1
      I saw 1 in the theater once.

      ...once more than I have!

      I've seen neither of the first two episodes. And nothing I've heard here has given me the slightest cause to suspect I'm missing out on anything...

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    94. Re:Episode III better rock by MagicDude · · Score: 1

      Greedo wasn't a bounty hunter. If you read the book "Tales from the Mos Eisley Cantina" he was just a kid who was set up to try and bring Solo in by some people who knew that Han would kill him. There's a back story about Greedo's race about how they the refugees scattered across the galaxy because their planet was conquered. The conquering race then hires mercinaries to find and kill the remaining survivors. They found young and impressionable Greedo, and convinced him to bring Solo in, thus having Han kill him, and they get their bounty.

    95. Re:Episode III better rock by cobe98 · · Score: 1

      Episode 3 = profit? maybe Lucas could include some underpants trolls instead of fucken Jar Jar

    96. Re:Episode III better rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I thought Episode II was ok. It was not that bad. If he makes another step forward he might just be in the right place: 1=suck 2=ok 3=good (4=great=star wars)

      So then it ramps up.

      Notice Jar Jar in 2? He looked to me unlike his normal self, almost like he was abused and afraid to blab for fear of getting it in the ass again...

      If 3 is good, then I think he should REMAKE 1,2 & 3 again; so they come out great. He should have warmed up by messing up on some related spin off series before doing these.

    97. Re:Episode III better rock by AeroIllini · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      The thing we have to remember about all the Star Wars movies is that they are based on the cheesy pulp sci-fi novels of the 1950s. Everything in the universe is a little hokey/cartoonish, themes are a little simplistic, characters have a never-ending supply of one-liners, and there's an overall feeling that each movie is just an episode in a much larger story.

      Staying true to that while still making a movie entertaining, engaging, and intriguing is a very fine line. One step to the right and the movie loses it's childhood fascination, and one step to the left creates a Saturday morning cartoon.

      Episodes IV, V, and VI treaded this line extremely well. Episode IV had the advantage of being the first: the filmmakers could simply introduce the SW universe and its concepts (good vs. evil, the Force, master/apprentice relationships, etc.) and the movie turned out to be pretty good (it also didn't hurt that the storyline followed a single arc, with only hints of other information). On top of that, it introduced fantastic special effect that no one had ever seen before, including making space battles look like war footage. Episodes V and VI had it a little rougher since the SW universe was not new, but they were likewise successes because the writers created intriguing new stories and populated them with genuinely likable characters (or, in the case of Vader, characters we could identify with). The universe also expanded from the simple good vs. evil to a place where betrayal and redemption are possible.

      So then 15 years pass and we are presented with Episodes I and II. On the surface, they look much the same as IV, V and VI: one-liners, wonderful special effects, villians, good guys, they have it all. Right? Wrong. The difference lies in the writing. While the dialog in Episodes IV, V, and VI may have been a little contrived and/or hokey ("Your problem is you don't have enough scoundrels in your life." "If there's a bright center to the universe, you're on the planet that it's farthest from.") it still seemed natural enough to be palatable. Contrast this with the dialog from Episodes I and II ("Once those droids will take control of the surface, they will take control of you." "I don't like sand. It's coarse and rough and irritating and it gets everywhere. Not like you. You're everything soft and smooth.") which is downright painful. None of the actors in the movies are bad, with the possible exception of the much-debated Jar-Jar, but they can only do so much with awful material. I'll bet even the wooden performance of Hayden Christiansen would have been fine if the dialog had been better (for reference, see Mark Hamill). In the midst of George's search for gee-whiz CGI effects and action figures, he lost sight of that very thin line, and the movies shifted to the left, into stupid Saturday morning cartoons.

      Recently, on a whim, I decided to watch Episode II with the DVD commentary track. To my delight, I discovered that the movie became infinitely better with the commentary track. I didn't have to listen to the awful dialog, I was still able to see the fantastic special effects, and I was listening to the moviemakers talk about what the movie was supposed to be: they would describe the underlying emotions of a scene for example, and their explanations would make far more sense than the innane chatter dribbling from the characters' mouths. Seriously. It makes the movie watchable.

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    98. Re:Episode III better rock by AeroIllini · · Score: 1

      ...and because it's a fantasy universe, no one will complain when I refuse to accept the existence of George's buzzkillers: the mitichlorians and the immaculate conception.

      They don't exist. Never happened.

      **sticks fingers in ears and hums the Imperial March**

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    99. Re:Episode III better rock by AeroIllini · · Score: 1

      So the DVD releases are going to contain more new footage? Because if I remember right, there was no Naboo celebration scene at the end of Episode VI: just Cloud City, Mos Eisley, Endor, and Coruscant.

      Leave it to George "Theatrical Releases are First Drafts" Lucas to give us 15 versions of the same movie.

      --
      For security, the MD5 hash of this message and sig is 09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0.
    100. Re:Episode III better rock by Grey+Tomorrow · · Score: 1

      Special Edition new scenes = sucked.

      Episode 1 = sucked.

      Episode 2 = sucked.

      Episode 3 = ?


      Profit?

    101. Re:Episode III better rock by cei · · Score: 1

      It is a stock, you can short it. Hollywood Stock Exchange

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
    102. Re:Episode III better rock by The+Sith+Lord · · Score: 1
      While some of them sound somewhat cool (whether they're real or not), there are some things that are just sacred.
      • You can't change the music. John Williams is a genius, and what he put in those movies was there for a reason. In fact the music is the only thing that's been consitently good in all the movies
      • Don't CG everything. There was a loveable quality to Jim Hensons puppets. Even though CG keeps getting better and better, it still doesn't integrate well with film, no matter how hard you try.
      Thankyou.
    103. Re:Episode III better rock by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1
      He'd better have the original cinematic release on there too, or I will be most displeased.

      One of the strengths of the original series (although ROTJ was weaker) was that the Emperor was mentioned, but not clearly revealed until ROTJ. This is a lot more sinister than having Vader meet him at the end of ANH.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    104. Re:Episode III better rock by beowulfcluster · · Score: 1

      It is true that people change, but parts also stay the same. Obi Wan in Ep 1 seemed like a completely different person than the Obi Wan of Ep 4,5,6. I would have liked to see circumstances change him from being one way to being like he is when he is older.

      Things will happen in Ep III though. In Ep I & II things are still going pretty smoothly for Obi-Wan and the jedis. In Ep III the jedis will be wiped out and Obi-Wan will be betrayed by Anakin (*woops*spoiler*too late*!). I think that plus 40 years of hiding in a desert might be enough to change him into what he is in Ep IV. The circumstances that change him haven't happened yet in I & II.

      Not that that's an excuse for I & II.

    105. Re:Episode III better rock by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      15. Hot 3-way sex scene between Leia, Han and Luke to open up a new market for `action figures'.

      Leia: Aren't you a little small for a stormtrooper?

      Luke: (pained expression) The force is strong with this one.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    106. Re:Episode III better rock by lindsayt · · Score: 1

      I agree wholeheartedly. Of course it's Lucas' right to do whatever he wants to his movies; that doesn't mean he should.

      A film in the 20th/21st centuries is an artform much as a symphony was in the 19th/20th. When we look back at composers such as Schubert and Bruckner who, though geniuses of the art, could not leave their own works alone, we see the tormented souls of men who wished they would have made different artistic choices as young men, trying to change it to suit the fashions and ideas of a later time, often making poor and/or inconsistent choices.

      With art that's almost 200 years old (in Schubert's case) or about 100 years old (in Bruckner's case) it's obvious it was better left alone, since perfection is impossible and the reworkings just muddled and confused things. I'm sure the same will be said of Lucas in 100 years if his art is still known.

      --
      I did not design this game/I did not name the stakes/I just happen to like apples/And I am not afraid of snakes-AniD
    107. Re:Episode III better rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Profit!

    108. Re:Episode III better rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where does it say they are clones? I always assumed that they started out as clones and as time went on, the empire would recruit people from all over. I figured the clones were just sort of a start up army. If them being all clones is mentioned somewhere, I'll stand corrected.

    109. Re:Episode III better rock by Kulaid982 · · Score: 0

      damn straight! my little brother and I used to dance and sing along with that shit when we were little kids... the yub yub song rocked hard!

      --

      Isn't it interesting how you come to recognize posters based solely on their sigs???
    110. Re:Episode III better rock by harborpirate · · Score: 1

      Hard to vote with your wallet when there is nothing to buy.

      --
      // harborpirate
      // Slashbots off the starboard bow!
    111. Re:Episode III better rock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Episode 4 = Profit!!!

    112. Re:Episode III better rock by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      If Yoda had been using minimal/aikido-type movements, it visually would have been boring.

      Perhaps, but that doesn't mean it wouldn't have been interesting.

      The Sith would not understand his ways, and like good kung-fu movies would try fierce attacks and be stymied, thwarted, and mystified. And get his ass kicked. Now that would be cool. Somebody else mentioned Mr. Miagi - I'll back him on this.

      In fact, the main problem with Eps 1 & 2 weren't that they were visually boring; they were actually quite stunning - they were just very intelectually boring.

      I expected him to attack with flying sabers, nearby pillars and rocks, all while sitting at a safe distance drinking a cup of tea.

      Brilliant imagery, thanks for the laugh. :)

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    113. Re:Episode III better rock by Ivan+Todoroski · · Score: 1

      Did you make transfers of all three original episodes? Is there a way I could get a copy of them? I only have old worn out VHS tapes, with no way of getting the originals on any other more permanent medium. :(

      Please contact me at grnch@gmx.net

      Please!

    114. Re:Episode III better rock by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
      Oh come on, who could possibly not look forward to another 6 hours of Jar-Jar??

      They're releasing extended edition DVDs of the prequels?? MEESA SAY ROCK!!

  4. Sequel Names... by H0NGK0NGPH00EY · · Score: 5, Funny

    Star Wars Episode 7: Milking the Cash Cow
    Star Wars Episode 8: Beating a Dead Horse
    Star Wars Episode 9: Please God, Make it Stop Already!

    --
    Do not read this sig.
    1. Re:Sequel Names... by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 0, Troll

      The Force is not with you be-ech.

    2. Re:Sequel Names... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very funny, but I think you meant episodes 6, 1 and 2.

    3. Re:Sequel Names... by sczimme · · Score: 1


      Reminiscient of the Simpsons parody entitled "Star Trek 12: So Very Tired":

      Sulu: "Captain, Klingons off the starboard bow."
      Kirk: "Again with the Klingons! Mr. Scott, give me full power."
      Mr. Scott: "It's no good, Cap'n - I canna reach the control panel!"

      While the the Simpsons writers were trying to be funny, any future Star Wars movies will probably be unintentionally funny, which is rather sad. D'oh.

      PS I know I mixed references from Star [Trek, Wars] - try to get past that.

      --
      I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    4. Re:Sequel Names... by sik0fewl · · Score: 1

      Star Wars Episode 10: Straight To Video

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
    5. Re:Sequel Names... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahem, I think the following penny arcade strip is relevent.
      http://www.penny-arcade.com/view.php3?d ate=2002-12 -13&res=l

    6. Re:Sequel Names... by poopie · · Score: 3, Funny

      If Episode 2 naming is any judge:

      Star Wars Episode 7: Revenge of the Mutant Ewoks
      Star Wars Episode 8: The 20-Foot Tall Love Slave from Venus
      Star Wars Episode 9: Jar Jar Binks vs. The Lost Dragon Vampire Ninjas

      Jedi Binks?

    7. Re:Sequel Names... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best star wars parody I've seen was thumb wars. Look it up, there are copies floating around the net.

    8. Re:Sequel Names... by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      Why doesn't Lucas just admit the obvious. He's pissed star trek got so many crappy sequels past the hollywood honchos that he's sworn to get at least one more past them.

    9. Re:Sequel Names... by dswartze · · Score: 1

      Episode 2 naming? have you ever actually looked at the names of the original three? They're just as bad Seriously, "Return of the Jedi" is as bad a name as "Attack of the Clones." "The Empire Strikes Back"? that's not the best name either.

    10. Re:Sequel Names... by norweigiantroll · · Score: 1

      Episode 2 naming? have you ever actually looked at the names of the original three? They're just as bad Seriously, "Return of the Jedi" is as bad a name as "Attack of the Clones." "The Empire Strikes Back"? that's not the best name either.

      Yeah, really! "Return of the Jedi", what a dumb name! Almost as bad as "Return of the King"! How cheesy.

    11. Re:Sequel Names... by hound3000 · · Score: 1

      I hate to say this, but the sequels are already filmed and done with...

      Star Wars 7: The Star Wars Holiday Special
      Star Wars 8: The Ewok Adventure
      Star Wars 9: The Battle for Endor

    12. Re:Sequel Names... by pVoid · · Score: 1
      I would prefer:

      Star Wars Episode 7: Milking the Cash Cow

      Star Wars Episode 8: Beating a Dead Horse

      Star Wars Episode 9: JEDI IN SOVIET RUSSIA!

  5. Who cares by Microsift · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Episode VI, I and II have all been mediocre, so why would anyone even bother seeing episode III much less VII, VIII, or IX?

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
    1. Re:Who cares by pvt_medic · · Score: 1

      because there are some people out there who live, eat and breath star wars

      --
      30% Troll, 50% Underrated, 10% Interesting
      Score:5, Troll
    2. Re:Who cares by bad_fx · · Score: 1

      RotJ may have been the worst of the originals (you'll definitely get no argument from me on that - I doubt anything will ever surpass Empire), but IMO it was still far superior to I or II... so please don't lump them together.

    3. Re:Who cares by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa there, don't just lump Jedi in with 1 and 2 so easily. Without the ewoks, that would have competed with Empire.

    4. Re:Who cares by Razor+Blades+are+Not · · Score: 1

      Natalie Portman was the only reason I saw the second one. I see no reason that will change.

    5. Re:Who cares by ChaoticChaos · · Score: 1

      ...like me.

    6. Re:Who cares by Golias · · Score: 1
      It's become very hip over the last 10 years to insist that Empire Strikes Back, considered by far the weakest of the three by most people back in 1987 when Jedi came out, was the best of the series. There's certainly a lot it has going for it... IMHO, Empire would have been the best film if:

      1. They didn't have that lame vision quest scene in the swamp where Like fights a phantom Darth Vader, and sees his own face under the helemt. That scene was dull, long, and pointless.

      2. It didn't take them 47 minutes of tearful melodrama to lower a shackled Han Solo into the carbonite chamber. What? It wasn't 47 minutes? Sure felt like it.

      3. Mark Hammel didn't go so over-the-top during the "I'm your father" scene. Was anybody actually moved by the sight of him blubbering out "NOOOOOOOOO"? Anyone at all?

      4. It actually had an ending, or even a climax. The final scene was just, "The Empire just kicked our asses for 90 minutes. Let's stare our a window."

      The best Star Wars movie was Star Wars.

      Empire and Jedi had some nice moments, but nothing that beats the first time you saw kind, soft-spoken old Ben whip his lightsaber out of nowhere and cut off that guy's arm for the first time.

      Or the very first time Harrison Ford did what became his action-movie signature: Chase the bad guys off-screen, then come running back the other way being chased by them.

      Or the sight of Darth Vader, a person we knew almost nothing about yet except that he was big, spooky, and in charge, preparing to drug and torture Princess Leah.

      Not to mention the introduction of the guns on the Falcon, the dogfight on the surface of the death star, the "land speeder" that looked like a hovering Dodge Charger convertable, R2 & 3PO walking through the middle of a firefight almost unnoticed, Han getting sick of Greedo's BS and shooting him under the table, Luke being a little short to be a stormtrooper, R2 being adviced to let the wookie win. The list goes on. All cherrished memories. Make my Star Wars the first one. It stood alone as a complete story worth watching, and is the only one that does.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    7. Re:Who cares by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      you know what they did to Episode 2.....they added a cloak to Portman when she was talking to Anikin in the "barn" or garage or what ever it is....no more nips!!!!! :-(

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    8. Re:Who cares by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

      For once I will not be going to see the Next Star Wars in the theaters..

      This fan is staying with the light side of the force while the movies go to the dark side...

    9. Re:Who cares by KikassAssassin · · Score: 1

      Because, believe it or not, some people have actually enjoyed the prequels so far. Call me nuts if you like, but I'm looking forward to Episode III.

      The first two prequels had their flaws, sure (PM's poor pacing, Jar-Jar; AotC's cheesy dialog), but they're still fun movies. I watch StarWars to see lightsaber fights, giant space battles, and cool action sequences where things blow up, and so far, the prequels have delivered that. I think people are putting the originals up on too high a nostalgia pedestal. Don't get me wrong--they're some of my favorite movies ever, but there's no denying that StarWars is a B-movie, and the prequels reflect that.

    10. Re:Who cares by sebi · · Score: 1
      The whole Empire vs. Jedi debate warrants a Clerks quote. You guys like Kevin Smith, right. Anyway when asked which of the both films he preferred Dante spoke thus:

      "Empire's got the better ending. Luke loses his arm, finds out Vader is his father. All that Jedi had was a bunch of muppets."

    11. Re:Who cares by Golias · · Score: 1
      I actually blame Kevin Smith for the "Empire was better" snobbishness that seems to dominate geek circles these days. I honestly never once heard anybody espouse this view prior to Clerks coming out, and after it became a hit, suddenly nerds everywhere consider themselves too good to admit to liking anything about Jedi.

      P.S. The Ewok "Yub nub" song was cool, and I don't care who thinks I'm wrong.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    12. Re:Who cares by sebi · · Score: 1

      I refrained from taking sides in the whole debate. I just wanted to show off my intimate knowledge of superfluous pop-culture. And the last couple of times I have seen the three movies it was always back to back, so they form an unit in my mind. It's just one film and I judge the whole, not the single acts.

    13. Re:Who cares by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      After the Episode 1 fiasco, which IMDb says brought in $65 million in the USA alone on its opening weekend, people proceeded to watch Episode 2, bringing in $80 million in the USA on its opening weekend. I don't really see this trend changing regardless the movies' qualities, unless they drop down to catastrophic levels compared to Episode I or something.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    14. Re:Who cares by JuggleGeek · · Score: 1
      Episode VI, I and II have all been mediocre, so why would anyone even bother seeing episode III much less VII, VIII, or IX?

      If you feel that way, you can probably save time by not reading the /. discussion about it.

      I see this quite often. People don't like X, so when they see /. talking about it, they rush right over to post "I don't like X." If you really don't care, as you say, then don't you have anything better to do with your time?

  6. force powers by bludstone · · Score: 4, Funny

    The force is strong with me. I see these movies coming out, and thousands of voices scream out in excitement, followed by anger.

    The future is always cloudy.

    --

    no .sig
    1. Re:force powers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm praying Peter Jackson will take over for the last 3 chapters.

    2. Re:force powers by Glog · · Score: 2, Funny

      Foolish you are, yes, padawan. Sentence structure invert you must, hrmm. I feel not the force in you.

  7. Oh great by wizarddc · · Score: 4, Funny

    7, 8 and 9? I must be one uninformed geek. I thought I only had 1 more disapointing movie left to watch.

    --
    Th
    1. Re:Oh great by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1
      I thought I only had 1 more disapointing movie left to watch.
      No need to worry, you can trust Hollywood in provide plenty of disappointments in the future.
    2. Re:Oh great by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      I hadn't heard they were going to make a 7, 8, and 9 either. I've always heard very faint rumorrumblings about it, but never anything remotely concrete.

      I think it'd be fun, though it depends on who makes it and what story they're telling. Might be neat to hear the Yuzhaan Vong story in those episodes...

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  8. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess there's no end to Lucas' whoreness.

  9. Do not dare to hope, it has left these lands... by stienman · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but the last three movies are going to be a re-write of LotR.

    Here's hoping for another Return of the King!

    -Adam

    1. Re:Do not dare to hope, it has left these lands... by Echnin · · Score: 1

      I was going to suggest it be called Return of the Jedi instead, but then I remembered something...

      --
      Lalala
    2. Re:Do not dare to hope, it has left these lands... by aiabx · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm waiting for Frodo vs Predator.
      -aiabx

      --
      Just this guy, you know?
  10. WWCD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What would Chewbacca do... if you took him to see the new Star Wars movies? He'd rip your arm off and beat you with the bloody end.

  11. 3 times the crap! by Sean80 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I'm sorry but I'm just sick of George Lucas raping my fond childhood memories of the first 3 Star Wars movies, and my wallet. Isn't it enough that he's created 2 incredibly bad movies in a row?

    I have to say, as much as I love Star Wars, I will have to seriously think about even going to see Episode 3. I'm not terribly hopeful. 3 more movies just doesn't fill me with any joy any more. From a worldwide love to a worldwide joke. Now -that's- a screwup.

    1. Re:3 times the crap! by happyfrogcow · · Score: 2, Interesting

      me too, but it's all about branding. you don't buy MS products because they're good, you buy them because they're well known

      So how many people will probably see episode 3 even though 1 and 2 sucked? I probably will. How many will see 7, 8, and 9? i might, might not... I feel 6 wrapped things up enough that I wouldn't be needing to see 7, 8, or 9 to satiate my curiosity. but Star Wars is a popular brand, so a lot of people will see them.

    2. Re:3 times the crap! by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      The next movie will be written and directed by Todd Solondz -- the guy who did Happiness.

      After that one scares everyone, David Lynch will turn down another offer to do one. He'll make an unwatchable 8 hour movie of Stranger In a Strange Land (I grok midgets). Quentin Tarantino will take over. How do I know? I just read it on The Internet.

    3. Re:3 times the crap! by gamgee5273 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Your childhood memories? I was four when the first movie came out. I saw it in the theaters (hell, I saw the Star Wars Holiday Special when it premiered on TV). And you know what? The new movies are the same calibur as the old ones. if you can't watch the old ones for what they are - a schlocky space opera - then you're doing a disservice to all of the movies and just shouldn't go any longer.

      I, on the other hand, have no problem letting ANOTHER person tell HIS story the way he sees fit. I either like it or dislike it - I don't take it as a personal attack on my childhood.

    4. Re:3 times the crap! by MissMarvel · · Score: 1

      Maybe not. When LOTR first hit the scenes as a cartoon it was a piece of crap too. However, Jackson's Trilogy was spectacular.

      If Lucas learned from his mistakes, starts with a good screenplay, some decent actors, and a hot director, he could have another cash-cow on his hands.

      Remember, everyone loves space movies. Even the last two Matrix movies made money, as bad as they were.

    5. Re:3 times the crap! by sebi · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Enough with the "rape-of-childhood-memories" bullshit already! I am so fucking sick of all the drama queens pretending that somehow a film they saw at the age of x+20 has the power to erase both the joy experienced at the age of x and the times spent pretending to be Han Solo.

      That has already happened and unless George Lucas goes around lobotomising his audience there is no way it can un-happen. If you feel that your wallet has been raped then maybe you shouldn't have bought the DVD or the action figures. Spending money on a movie ticket is like forced sex to you? Someone has to get their sense of perspective checked and it is not me.

      Needed to get this off my chest. So much in fact that I will throw in an extra point for the moderators to take away from me.

    6. Re:3 times the crap! by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      I will watch 3 to see what the entire point of the series is: the fall of A Good Kid (tm) into Vader. There's some inherent interest in getting the 'whole' story.

      Successors to Jedi don't have any such story... The good guys wons an (apparently) conclusive victory.

      (Incidently, I don't think I and II really sucked. They were OK, but suffered from the fact that Lucas seems to be making movies just to bust out f/x. The acting/dialog in the first 3 wasn't so great either.... nostalgia gives it a HUGE boost)

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    7. Re:3 times the crap! by gosand · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry but I'm just sick of George Lucas raping my fond childhood memories of the first 3 Star Wars movies, and my wallet. Isn't it enough that he's created 2 incredibly bad movies in a row? I have to say, as much as I love Star Wars, I will have to seriously think about even going to see Episode 3. I'm not terribly hopeful. 3 more movies just doesn't fill me with any joy any more. From a worldwide love to a worldwide joke. Now -that's- a screwup.

      When Episode II was out, everyone kept telling me they couldn't believe I hadn't seen it yet. I had one coworker who saw it multiple times. He said he liked it a lot. After getting excited (and very very letdown) about Episode I, I decided to wait on Episode II. I didn't see it in the theater, I rented it. I am so glad too, because I was able to fast-forward through the excruciatingly drawn-out love scenes. Even at that speed they were painful.

      I didn't see the last Matrix movie in the theater either. The second one was somewhat of a letdown, and after hearing reviews of the third, I made the choice to wait again. I look forward to renting it, but am glad I waited. With ticket prices where they are, it takes a lot to get me to go to the theater anymore. I am content to wait until they come out on rental. I feel like I am not really missing much. You can talk about the "theater experience", but I value my time more than the experience.

      Lucas blew it with EP I, and just blew with EP II. I hope EP III is a colossol flop at the box office, regardless of how good it is.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    8. Re:3 times the crap! by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      Ah, you're of the camp that thinks the hokey cheese of the prequel trilogy is the same as the hokey cheese of the first trilogy.

      I hate to burst your bubble, but it is absolutely, 100% not. Believe it or not, those first three movies had good acting, good dialogue, and stories we cared about! I don't care about blue-screened political meetings or CG ninja Yodas.

      I, on the other hand, have no problem letting ANOTHER person tell HIS story the way he sees fit. I either like it or dislike it - I don't take it as a personal attack on my childhood.

      Which means that you like whatever crap he turns out because it's "HIS." As if that absolves it of criticism.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    9. Re:3 times the crap! by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1
      Yep. Mark Hamill was passed over for that Best Actor in 1978... the dialogue was so good... and the FX were so convincing in all of the scenes.

      No, they weren't. If you want to be critical, you have to take a critical view of all of it or none of it. You're smoking something nice if you really think that the first three flicks are truly superior to the newest ones. (Did you bring enough to share with the class?)

      The only one that stands out above the others is ESB and that's because of Kirschner and Brackett. No one, even the die hard fans, are going to disagree with that. If you had said that ESB was the strongest and the other movies have never hold a candle to it, I would wholeheartedly agree.

      Write your own movie if you don't like it. Say you don't like it, but don't go whining about him "raping" your childhood memories. That allows for no creative license, whether you like it or not, on the part of the creator.

      Get off the high horse and let the man do what he likes. If you don't like it, then you don't like it. Life goes on.

    10. Re:3 times the crap! by Jahf · · Score: 1

      Vote with your wallet, don't go see them. They can't make you spend what you aren't willing to pay.

      It's not just Lucas that is ripping you off ... for instance AMC has decided to up their ticket price to $9 from $7 soon. I'm sure they are responding to a rising cost for screening movies, but at some point the responsibility is on we the folk who pay the cost.

      We are a small town with a very good community theater built in an old elementary school auditorium. We get alot of first-run movies in the middle of the run (at about 4-6 weeks after initial screening when the theaters are returning some of the extra copies before the run is over that they use to screen multiple auditoriums). Sure, we only get them for 2 nights, but we only have 1,500 people in the town. It costs us a whopping $5/ticket for a Friday or Saturday 7:30pm showing. Concessions only cost ... well ... cost. I get a soda and a box of candy or popcorn for $1.50 and they let you bring it in.

      While not feasible for -all- communities, we're only 15 miles away from "real" theaters (although if you're gonna see a movie in this area it will be in Broomfield or Westminster where the theaters are much nicer) in Boulder, Colorado and we are able to do this so the screening contracts must not be too restrictive. Make it a non-profit co-op and see if you can lower the costs for your community while creating a neighborhood social center.

      Or just wait for Netflix to get it. Either way, send a message that quality is better than quantity and low cost is worth a little wait.

      Or if you're sure it will be a true disappointment, just don't go. EVERYONE got faked out by Episode 1, but if you also didn't like Ep2 and you -still- pay close to $10 for a ticket to Ep3 ... who's fault is it (and notice I'm leaving out the obligatory Ep4 jedi quote :).

      --
      It is more productive to voice thoughtful opinions (reply) than to judge (moderate) others.
    11. Re:3 times the crap! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      If you think about it in context of the time, the first three where fantastic, and ahead of its time.
      Brought a great story to the screen, and made people talk about the movies for many many years after the movie was done.
      I was 12 when it came out. the opening scene had people in awe. People cheered when the death star exploded.
      All hallmarks of a great movie.

      Compar that to today, where the effects are not cutting edge. One of the principle actors annoys the hell out of everyone, the Jedi mythose is washed away when all the Jedi fighting are angry, Etc...

      Are his latest movies crap? no. But they are not the same calibur for todays audience then the original was for it's audience.

      Thats probably unfair to Lucas. Just because you do something that people find great, doesn't mean you'll do it again.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:3 times the crap! by frenchgates · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are a large number of fans of the first two or three films who have such an intense negative reaction to the prequels that they feel Lucas is managing to retroactively ruin the original experiences. I am one of these people.

      The apologists insist that this is simply because we were children when we saw the first movies and that the prequels are just as good TO CHILDREN.

      I disagree on a number of levels. Obviously there is no simple objective truth to this kind of aesthetic judgement, and a lot of people will always stand behind George. But I think that the number of people who feel exactly as I do, that the prequels are little more than magnifications and concentrations of the things that were wrong with the first three (especially RoJ), is large enough that the phenomenon deserves respect.

      Face it, "kids love it" doesn't excuse anything. Kids love a lot of things that are as close as you can get to objectively horrible.

      A lot of adults find the first three films to be great and to withstand the test of time, even when they aren't being merely sentimental.

      Lucas had an opportunity to make almost all SW fans very happy with the prequels, adults and children, by making them great. Instead he created a schism in the community. I think this didn't have to happen.

      I guess I'm glad people like you can enjoy what Lucas did, but have some sympathy for those of us movie fans who had really, really high levels of excitement for the prequels but ended up getting surprise attacked by Jar Jar and now can't even enjoy the originals.

      --
      Syntax error: loose != lose, affect != effect, then!=than
    13. Re:3 times the crap! by Luscious868 · · Score: 1

      I disagree completely. As far as I can tell, there were no poop and fart jokes in the old movies. Episode I was a complete and total waste. The humor was clearly targeted at little kids. In fact, the majority of the movie was. There were many child characters in Episode I and there were very cartoony aliens all of which was clearly aimed at pleasing kids at the behest of adults. Re-watch the old trilogy. Minus the ewoks, there is nothing in the original movies that clearly panders to children. The humor in the originals, while hokey at times, isn't necessarily targeted to appeal to 5 year olds like Jar Jar's antics and the poop and fart jokes in Episode I. Episode II was a little better in the child pandering department, but the dialog overall, and the acting in some areas, was just plain horrible. The first two Star War's movies are movies that while a little hokey, appeal to both kids and adults. The third has the ewoks, but other than that minor annoyance, it also appeals to kids and adults. Episode I is certainly not geared toward adults. The humor is geared toward children, there is little real violence and Jar Jar is clearly only there to make 5 year olds laugh and sell toys.

    14. Re:3 times the crap! by mongoks · · Score: 1

      I totally concur about the Jedi part. The Jedi in the prequels are not at all like the ones I imagined when I saw the original trilogy. I pictured Jedi Knights as being elegant, heroic and full of charisma not a bunch of whiny brats with sticks up their asses.

    15. Re:3 times the crap! by Wister285 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While the Star Wars movies are definitely some of my favorite movies of all time, I don't know how great everyone's acting was in all of the movies. Harrison Ford was very consistant. When I think of Mark Hamill, all I can think about is him on Bespine yelling, "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!" with that terrible look on his face. It was and still is very strange.

      Just because you think that the new films aren't as great as the old ones are, there is a simple reason for this. All of the new ones have been hyped to no end and they will never live up to your expectations. Also, you know what's coming, the ideas aren't as original as they used to be. Don't forget that I'm sure your standard for film has been raised over the years, so the Star Wars films just don't seem as great as they once were because you expect so much.

      If you just watch the movies for what they are, you won't be disappointed and might enjoy yourself. At least Star Wars makes sense. Don't get me started on the Matrix: Revolutions.

    16. Re:3 times the crap! by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Mace Windu mother fucker.

      Mace fucking Windu.

      that's all i'm saying.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    17. Re:3 times the crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was evidence to prove that Overly Critical Guy is a lying cocksucker, but he deleted it. Think independently.

    18. Re:3 times the crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he is just trying to do a Bush?

    19. Re:3 times the crap! by bradasch · · Score: 1

      Exactly! I saw the episodes 4-6 again these days, and, by God, do they suck big time! Bad acting (Mark Hamill is a gem at bad acting) is there, poor story lines and crappy special effects (I know it was the best at the time, but today they just look crappy).

      People complain about episodes 1 and 2 being bad, but my guess is that they just have fond childhood memories from the past movies and now see things very critically. Nothing George Lucas puts out will please this crowd.

  12. Can we get the screenwriter from Empire? by oliverk · · Score: 1

    Please, please don't let Lucas write anymore!!! Empire was _awesome_ and just so overshadows Eps 1 & 2...

    --
    ---- Please be nice in case my Slashdot karma ~= my real life karma.
    1. Re:Can we get the screenwriter from Empire? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, she's dead since 1978. It was Leigh Brackett, who wrote many memorable screenplays (often for Howard Hawk) including the Big Sleep (1944), and was also a well-known sci-fi (and western) writer in her time. She was the reason Empire is the best of the SW movies, in my opinion.

  13. Why the US? 3 More for Lucas to F@ck up by strictnein · · Score: 1

    Why did it take for this magazine to get to the US for this information to get widely publicized?

    Anyways... 3 more Star Wars movies just doesn't excite me as much as it might have. After seeing Lucas sodomize the Episodes I and II like he did, I can't imagine he's going to have some great revelation (*cough*Jar Jar binks needs to die*cough*) and make three great movies.

    Lets guess at some titles:

    Episode 7: Jar Jar Strikes Back
    Episode 8: Jar Jar Has Kids
    Episode 9: The Destruction of the Star Wars Fan Base

    Ughh...

    1. Re:Why the US? 3 More for Lucas to F@ck up by Velcroman98 · · Score: 1

      Why not finish his Howard the Duck Trilogy?

  14. Can we start a petition? by EulerX07 · · Score: 1

    The petition would be :

    George, you've got the content control, it's your universe, you define it. BUT, someone else writes the scripts and dialogue, someone else produces it, and someone else directs it.

    1. Re:Can we start a petition? by agrippa_cash · · Score: 1

      I think he is bored with Star Wars anyway. I doubt he'll be directing any more Star Wars films after these. No, I have nothing to back up these suppositions (except for the last two films).

  15. good news? by devphaeton · · Score: 1

    At one point (about 3 years ago) i coulda swore i read that Peter Mayhew had died. I was bummed.

    Nice to see he's in good shape otherwise.

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
    1. Re:good news? by Feathers+McGraw · · Score: 1

      Peter Mayhew may be alive and kicking, but I could have sworn reading somewhere that Chewbacca was not as lucky.

    2. Re:good news? by macmastery · · Score: 1

      I think Chewbacca was killed off in a book series. Maybe that's what you were thinking of?

    3. Re:good news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it was the character of Chewie who died.

    4. Re:good news? by WOSSquee · · Score: 1

      *Extended Universe Spoiler* Might be because they killed off Chewie in one of the books... the bastards. I stopped reading EU books after I read that one.

    5. Re:good news? by ENOENT · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought that Chewbacca played a key role in the OJ case.

      --
      That's "Mr. Soulless Automaton" to you, Bub.
    6. Re:good news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're thinking of Walter Matthau. He and Jack Lemon are tag teaming JFK Jr. in hell right now.

    7. Re:good news? by PhotoBoy · · Score: 1

      The bear that provided the growls and roars for Chewie died a few years back, maybe that was it.

    8. Re:good news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i read that Peter Mayhew had died ... Nice to see he's in good shape otherwise.

      Yeah, because being dead makes it really difficult to keep fit.

    9. Re:good news? by arth1 · · Score: 1
      The bear that provided the growls and roars for Chewie died a few years back, maybe that was it.

      Bear? I am pretty sure it was a camel. No, really.

      Regards,
      --
      *Art
    10. Re:good news? by khrustalicious · · Score: 1

      He did... But Lucas is used to rehashing things he's beaten to death..why should Mayhew be any different?

    11. Re:good news? by Asmodean · · Score: 1

      Bears do not growl and roar, they may growl a little, but NOTHING like what you see on TV. Every time you see a bear roar on TV it is FAKE, it's just to make them look scarier.

      --
      It's a good thing the world sucks or we'd all fall off.
    12. Re:good news? by PhotoBoy · · Score: 1

      It looks like we're both right:

      http://wookiee.8k.com/bts.html :)

    13. Re:good news? by Mod+Me+God · · Score: 1

      Well, it played a role though I'm not sure how decisive it was.

      --
      --

      FreeNET user? Comfortable with the adverse selection?
  16. ...because of LotR by nphinit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Realizing I through III will not turn out to be the worshipped saga he had hoped for, and since LotR now defines the high-quality fantasy saga, George wants another shot to redeem it all?

    1. Re:...because of LotR by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > George wants another shot to redeem it all?

      More like he wants another shot at being a trillionaire.

    2. Re:...because of LotR by nphinit · · Score: 1

      >More like he wants another shot at being a trillionaire.

      He's what, 60-ish? So what if he makes a few more billion. It can't be about money at this point.

  17. Let it die alrady by 32bitwonder · · Score: 1

    This "series" was already ruined with Ep. I and II. Any more of this is just beating a dead horse.

  18. Slashdot 3004 comment... by Caeda · · Score: 0

    Yep, just went out and bout the new Star Wars Tera-Peta-Giga Vid cube box set! Got all 4872 episodes in one nice little box.. with over 3 years of special features and directors comments!

    --
    ~~ Please keep your arms, legs, and outright stupidity inside the ride at all times. Thank You ~~
  19. Sequence by nightsweat · · Score: 2, Funny
    First, was IV, then V, then VI, then of course, I, next II, and soon III.

    Now VI, VII, and VII. Star Wars - teaching Roman numerals to whole new generation.

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    1. Re:Sequence by zapp · · Score: 1

      Apparently you missed a lesson.
      You just said the sequence is:
      4, 5, 6
      1, 2, 3
      6, 7, 8

      --
      no comment
    2. Re:Sequence by zapp · · Score: 2, Funny

      Crap! I read that wrong

      you actually said the sequence was:
      4,5,6
      1,2,3
      5,6,6

      --
      no comment
    3. Re:Sequence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually he said the 3rd sequence was 6, 7, 7

    4. Re:Sequence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man are you retarded. 6,7,7

    5. Re:Sequence by strictnein · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apparantely you both missed a lesson, he originally said:

      First, was IV, then V, then VI, then of course, I, next II, and soon III.
      Now VI, VII, and VII. Star Wars - teaching Roman numerals to whole new generation.


      Then you said:

      Apparently you missed a lesson.
      You just said the sequence is:
      4, 5, 6
      1, 2, 3
      6, 7, 8


      But he really originaly said:

      4, 5, 6
      1, 2, 3
      6, 7, 7

    6. Re:Sequence by #define · · Score: 1

      Now VI, VII, and VII. Star Wars - teaching Roman numerals to whole new generation.

      Apparently they have a LONG way go, too.

    7. Re:Sequence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparantely you both missed a lesson, he originally said:

      First, was IV, then V, then VI, then of course, I, next II, and soon III.
      Now VI, VII, and VII. Star Wars - teaching Roman numerals to whole new generation.

      Then you said:

      Apparently you missed a lesson.
      You just said the sequence is:
      4, 5, 6
      1, 2, 3
      6, 7, 8

      But he really originaly said:

      4, 5, 6
      1, 2, 3
      6, 7, 7


      Well you can't spell worth shit so I wouldn't go around correcting people if I were you.

    8. Re:Sequence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my God. Let it go already.

    9. Re:Sequence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, you first

    10. Re:Sequence by milkman_matt · · Score: 1
      Crap! I read that wrong

      you actually said the sequence was:
      4,5,6
      1,2,3
      5,6,6

      In the Lucasverse, this could very well be accurate. :)

      -matt

    11. Re:Sequence by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      Jesus, get a girlfriend.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    12. Re:Sequence by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      Jesus, get a girlfriend.

      I thought this thread was about Star Wars et seq (and et preq), not The Last Temptation of Christ.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    13. Re:Sequence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was evidence to prove that Overly Critical Guy is a lying cocksucker, but he deleted it. Think independently.

  20. StarWars.com USED to show eps VII, VIII and IX by bluethundr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember back in around 1996 seeing slots for eps I,II,III,IV,V,VI and VII,VIII,IX on the StarWars.com homepage. Though a recent trip to the WayBack Machine seems to refute that memory. But they only go back to Dec 30th of '96 and my memory of VII,VIII,IX is a pretty clear one I'm adamant of having seen. But, interestingly enough Lucas had made some pretty clear statements that he NEVER intended to make a VII,VIII,IX trilogy. But I chalk those statements up to the same sort of Soviet revisionist history that made Greedo shoot first.

    However, as we all know, the prequels don't hold a CANDEL to the originals. Maybe Lucas is FINALLY starting to realize this and hoping to restore the franchise to it's former glory, removing the tarnish of eps I and II. If that be the case, I truly hope that he can. Truly.

    --
    Quod scripsi, scripsi.
    1. Re:StarWars.com USED to show eps VII, VIII and IX by hrieke · · Score: 1

      I remember reading about it in People Magazine back in the 1980s that Star Wars was going to be 9 eps. long.

      However, after seeing 1 & 2 and the 'enhanced versions', I wonder if GL shouldn't let it go.

      --
      III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
    2. Re:StarWars.com USED to show eps VII, VIII and IX by nitemayr · · Score: 1

      Wizard Magazine carried a story about the "Final Three Parts" way back in the early nineties... I cannot remember when, just 1994-1996 somewhere....

      --
      Hello Kettle,
      You, my friend are as black as pitch.
      With love, Pot.
    3. Re:StarWars.com USED to show eps VII, VIII and IX by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      You are correct... Both that the site used to have spots for all 9 episodes, and that there is some bizzarre ancient dabblings that create such travesties as having Greedo shoot first.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    4. Re:StarWars.com USED to show eps VII, VIII and IX by Krieger · · Score: 1

      Your memory is in fact correct. Before all our hopes were crushed by George exercising control. There were slots for 7-9. It was exciting, and then he cancelled 7-9 just before starting up on production of 1. I'm sure someone could probably find the press release, and/or really old screenshots. There has to be some obsessed fanboy that took a screenshot way back when.

    5. Re:StarWars.com USED to show eps VII, VIII and IX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      minor correction, it is "candle", not "candel".

    6. Re:StarWars.com USED to show eps VII, VIII and IX by Complicity · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Thank you, groups.google.com ...

      "Revenge of the Jedi"... Episode 6 in the Star Wars saga, has
      just finished filming, according to some friends I have down in
      Arizona.

      The release date for us humans that want to see it is
      still the summer of 1983. I guess it takes that long to score
      all the music, do all the film-editing, prepare all the promo
      material, and all that junk.

      I wish Lucas & Co. would get the thing going a little faster.
      I can't really imagine waiting until 1997 to see all nine parts
      of the Star Wars series.

      Yeah, me neither... :)
      --
      - c -
  21. And we thought it couldn't get any worse... by addie · · Score: 1

    Or after EpII at least that's what I thought. But imagine what they'll have to do to make 7,8, and 9. There's no way they can get back all the original actors. So that means CG actors, which is a terrible idea, or brand new story lines with plots based solely on huge CG battle scenes (which given Lucas' skill as a director, also a terrible idea).

    George should cut his losses and TRY SOMETHING NEW. Sequelitis is continually lowering the standards of an already washed-out industry.

    1. Re:And we thought it couldn't get any worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no way they can get back all the original actors.

      If they did, and the episodes were set far enough in the future, then they'd have aged perfectly for the roles, wouldn't they?

    2. Re:And we thought it couldn't get any worse... by addie · · Score: 1

      I simply meant in terms of logistics and costs. Getting them all back seems unlikely, and therefore the script would probably have to be based on which actors they could get back.

      It's just not a good idea.

    3. Re:And we thought it couldn't get any worse... by rjelks · · Score: 1

      How about the adventures of the "Star Wars Kid".

      -

  22. I thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lucas said that Ep. 7-9 would depend on the success of Ep. 1-3.

    That "CG" labeled crackpipe must have blurred his mind.

    Well George, lets see how long the lines in front of the cinemas will be this time.

  23. Oh sweet mother Jedi by molrak · · Score: 1

    Just what the world needs, another crappy scifi trilogy. After the fiascoes in storytelling that have been Episodes 1 & 2, why would anyone want to go see these sequel movies? It's bad enough that Lucas is shoving Geriatric Jones and the Lost Walking Cane on us.

    Granted, I'm going to go see Episode 3, but I'll not be participating in any sort of line party for it, and I may even opt to rent at as opposed to seeing it in the theater. I'll be surprised if it even manages to match Episode 2's BO, and Episode 2's BO was nowhere near Episode 1's BO.
    (BO=Body Odor or Box Office, whichever.)

    --
    You're only as smart as your brain.
  24. Original Trilogy DVDs by Complicity · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you thought that you were going to have to wait a long time to get the original trilogy DVDs before...

    --
    - c -
  25. Episodes 7, 8, and 9... by nubbie · · Score: 1

    Has there actualy been books about theses? I thought I remember hearing Lucas never wanted to write them?

    --
    'Go for the eyes, Boo, go for the eyes, aaarrrrrrrr!' -- Minsc
    1. Re:Episodes 7, 8, and 9... by Warlock7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, no books yet. But back in the day Lucas always claimed that this was a nine part story.

    2. Re:Episodes 7, 8, and 9... by schon · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought I remember hearing Lucas never wanted to write them?

      Well, we're in luck then. They might actually be watchable. :o)

    3. Re:Episodes 7, 8, and 9... by MattW · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you'd call these "Ep 7/8/9", but Timothy Zahn wrote a trilogy that began with "Heir to the Empire", and was a trilogy where a Grand Admiral tries to bring the Empire to power using his control over the remnants. It was a fun to read series, and Grand Admiral Thrawn was a very cool character. It seemed to me to follow the general context of Ep 4-6, with someone picking up the pieces of the empire, as well as following all the other major characters (Luke, Leia, Han Solo, etc).

      Heir to the Empire at Amazon

  26. Contracts... by Whispers_in_the_dark · · Score: 5, Insightful

    However, TheForce is reporting that Mayhew's contract contains a stipulation that he must also appear in Episodes 7, 8, and 9.

    IMNAAA (not an acting agent), but isn't this just the sort of thing that gets tossed into lower-paid actor's contracts when a studio is simply hedging its bets? I like the 'bacca as well as the next dude, but he is probably paid less than, say Harrison Ford, on average. It seems likely to me that it wouldn't cost the studio much (if anything) to obligate him in this regard.

    Now, if the face-time Ep. 6 folks (Ford, Fisher, Hamilton, et al.) start getting signed into contracts like this then we would be talking.

    1. Re:Contracts... by Joeyspecial · · Score: 0

      If you watch celebrity poker, you know Carrie Fisher is in no condition to do anything except down a bottle of vicatin. Seeing her fat ass 'flop the nuts' crushed my childhood fantisies worse than Jar-Jar.

    2. Re:Contracts... by Mr_Icon · · Score: 1
      Now, if the face-time Ep. 6 folks (Ford, Fisher, Hamilton, et al.) start getting signed into contracts like this then we would be talking.

      Yeah, I see it now... Star Wars episode VI -- Attack of the Geriatric Ward.

      --
      If you open yourself to the foo, You and foo become one.
    3. Re:Contracts... by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Uhh... they already made Episode 6. Did you mean 7, 8, 9?

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    4. Re:Contracts... by UnHolyRam · · Score: 1

      Now, if the face-time Ep. 6 folks (Ford, Fisher, Hamilton, et al.) start getting signed into contracts like this then we would be talking. And exactly which character was Hamilton?

    5. Re:Contracts... by hibiki_r · · Score: 1

      I think he means Hamill, Mark Hamill, who played Luke in the originals.

  27. Aw, where's the sequel we all want? by LNO · · Score: 1

    Yogurt: God willing, we'll all meet again in Spaceballs II: The Search For More Money.

    1. Re:Aw, where's the sequel we all want? by pyros · · Score: 1

      I don't remember where, but I swear at one point I heard Mel Brooks mention Spaceballs III: The Seach for Spaceballs II.

    2. Re:Aw, where's the sequel we all want? by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      What about Spaceballs 0: The Phantom Prequel

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  28. Slightly Off Topic... by starvingcodeartist · · Score: 1

    But...why does everyone think that the new Star Wars movies suck? I agree, they're friggin' terrible. Lucas has enough money to hire talented script writer and at least make a good script, but he doesn't seem to do that even. And lets not forget Jar Jar. Who the hell thought that was a good idea? I don't know. Does he just not care, because no matter what crap he puts out, all of us geeks are going to go see it? Sorry for being slightly off topic...but I've been wondering about this for awhile and would like to hear other's opinions.

    1. Re:Slightly Off Topic... by lambadomy · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine it has to do with one person having complete creative control. While I have no idea what Gary Kurtz did as a producer, he was the producer of Star Wars and Empire, and nothing else. Lucas didn't direct Empire or Jedi, and Lawrence Kasdan was the screenwriter or at least scrpit doctor for those movies. Lucas couldn't do whatever he wanted with Star Wars, because it was unproven. With Empire and Jedi, he probably had more leeway due to his success, but he chose to let others take the reigns in important areas. Now, he seems to have complete control of everything, and, well, these are the results.

    2. Re:Slightly Off Topic... by LordZardoz · · Score: 1

      The simple reason is that Starwars is both helped and hindered by its vocal and rabid fan base.

      The fan base helps keep the series popular, and provides a very steady market for Starwars based merchandise (Novels, Games, and Toys).

      The fan base hurts the franchise for two very specific reasons. The first is that it prevents Starwars from evolving much beyond what its fan base expects. If you read some of the novels, they always have the characters from the movies paraphrasing their own quotes, and expanding on people and places mentioned off hand in one line of dialog.

      The other problem is that the fans have had 20 years to fill in the blanks themselves, and often they find that Lucas's ideas just dont seem as cool to them as their ideas did. That, and some of the ideas introduced were just simply very bad.

      The final problem is that while the franchise cannot evolve for fear of alienating its fan base, the fan base has evolved. Fans that absolutely thought that Ewoks and a Muppet Yoda were awesome 20 years ago would not think so today.

      END COMMUNICATION

    3. Re:Slightly Off Topic... by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      Why do they suck? George has complete and total control and is surrounded by yes-men who kiss his ass and tell him that every stuoid idea he spouts is great. He has no one who can say "George, that's stupid!" to him.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  29. This could be Lucas' chance to redeem himself! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's withhold judgement for a little while. The entire prequel concept, in retrospect, seems doomed to be derided by Star Wars geeks by its very nature.....

    But if Lucas can take the lessons he has (hopefully!) learned from the prequels and make a third Sequel trilogy that takes these lessons into account -- hopefully by going with a respected existing storyline like Zahn's books -- the salvation of the Star Wars mythology is not out of the question....

    1. Re:This could be Lucas' chance to redeem himself! by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      If that lesson is, DON'T LET TERRY BROOKS WRITE THEM, then yes, let's hope he's learned his lesson.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  30. Great idea by Dr_LHA · · Score: 1

    Yes - Star Wars Episodes 7,8 and 9 would be a great idea. However only if George Lucas moves into an "Executive Producer" role only.

    The new Star Wars could then be made by the next generation of up and coming directors and script writers, and might actually not suck.

  31. Too Old by jlechem · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wouldn't take stock in this. How old is George Lucas now, 55 60? It takes him roughly 8-10 years a trilogy. He'ld be in a wheelchair by the time he finished the next ones if he even lived that long. I would think he wants to move on and do other things. And who would play all the original roles. All the main actors have not aged well and it would be very shitty to not have Mark Hammil reprise his role as Luke Skywalker or Harrison Ford play Han Solo.

    --
    Hold up, wait a minute, let me put some pimpin in it
    1. Re:Too Old by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1
      All the main actors have not aged well and it would be very shitty to not have Mark Hammil reprise his role as Luke Skywalker or Harrison Ford play Han Solo.

      Unless, of course, the next trilogy is set far into the future relative to Episode 6.

    2. Re:Too Old by Complicity · · Score: 1
      How old is George Lucas now, 55 60? It takes him roughly 8-10 years a trilogy. He'ld be in a wheelchair by the time he finished the next ones if he even lived that long.

      George Lucas being too old/feeble/etc. to be too heavily involved in a third trilogy could very well be the best thing to happen to said trilogy.
      --
      - c -
    3. Re:Too Old by Flunitrazepam · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the original drafts of all 9 episodes, they were grouped by threes, and the only recurring characters (from one trilogy to the next) were supposed r2d2 and c3p0.

      --
      1) Your analysis is based on bad assumptions so your result is way off. 2) You're a sick bastard for fucking a horse.
    4. Re:Too Old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      55 or 60 too old to work on a movie? In this day and age, he's got another 30 years before his age affects his work. Like Lucas or not, saying that 55 or 60 is too old is just silly.

    5. Re:Too Old by steveha · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All the main actors have not aged well

      Funny you should say that. I remember, years ago (around the time of Episode V), George Lucas was asked if the main actors would be back for episodes VII, VIII, and IX; his reply was "sure, if they can be made to look old enough." The implication was that he wanted to set the final trilogy a few decades after the end of Episode VI.

      On the other hand, his more recent comment was that he "Never really had a story" for the final trilogy.

      On the gripping hand, it's clear that not having a story never really stops him. I refuse to believe that he planned all along for young Skywalker to build C-3PO, for example. I refuse to believe that during filming of Episode IV that he had already planned that Darth Vader would have grown up on Tattooine. I strongly suspect that the whole Luke/Leia being brother/sister was invented after he already had finished Episode IV. He just makes stuff up and sticks it on.

      Star Wars is great not because of George Lucas, who got the ball rolling, but because of the contributions of so many people. The sets, costumes, and effects represent man-years of work by many people. At this point you could take Star Wars out of George Lucas's hands and make new movies. (Sadly, they might be better movies for that; George Lucas's recent track record isn't great.)

      I predict we'll see Episodes VII, VIII, and IX someday, no matter what George Lucas says now. And we'll probably see other movies as well. (I'd like to see some "Jedi Academy" movies.)

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    6. Re:Too Old by fbg111 · · Score: 1

      wouldn't take stock in this. How old is George Lucas now, 55 60? It takes him roughly 8-10 years a trilogy. He'ld be in a wheelchair by the time he finished the next ones if he even lived that long. I would think he wants to move on and do other things.

      Yeah, like letting someone else write the script for the new movies. The dialogue in I,II,III is the absolute worst I've heard since kindergarten.

      --
      Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
    7. Re:Too Old by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Actually, Star Wars 7, 8, & 9 could be the first major movies to use CG actors to replace the aging actors. They could scan in Harrison Ford from all his movies and pick just the age that they want him at. Actually, I'd think the only hard part would be the face. How hard would it be to use some one else's body? I could imagine contract disputes galore.

    8. Re:Too Old by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      I don't think I would go with Georges age as a disqualifier here. I'd like to but he's not so old that he can't get it done if he wants to.

      I'm not saying that this is necessarily a good thing so let me make that clear.

      First off he's not poor, in bad health that we know of, and he's got the resources to keep himself in good shape for some time to come.

      Second you have to admit that at the rate he's going the final three could have almost no actor involvement whatsoever. The last three could be put at the exact moment Jedi ended and I wouldn't put it past George to CGI in all of the characters. You would get the original Luke, Han, and Leia done in CGI and acting almost as wooden as they did in Episode VI and George wouldn't have to deal with any annoying actors while making his "vision" come to life.

      Seriously, say he takes another year to get Episode III out (which is I think correct, I have to admit I no longer care after Phantom and Clones) and then takes 3-4 years to crank up Episode VII. By that time he might make an attempt at something like a CGI original cast.

      The way Georges mind works anything that didn't come out the way he wanted it to would simply be a good reason to go back and fix it later.

      I've got this mental picture of an 80 year old Lucas sitting in a dark room lit only by the glow of several silly big monitors (looking like a cross between Howard Hughes and Palpatine) reviewing the latest CGI work.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    9. Re:Too Old by pragma_x · · Score: 1

      ...even lived that long

      What really frightens me about the concept of Lucas passing on is what happens to the fan/studio reaction to such a thing?

      Not that I'm even attempting to liken the two in terms of writing/directing/producing films, but after Kubrick died, his work gained even more popularity. And not just the stuff he'd finished; take 'Eyes Wide Shut' and 'AI' for example. Would this happen to Lucas if he died with the scripts for the next three films tied to his estate? (or in a move studio vault somewhere?)

      You'd better believe that *someone* is going to try to capture the eventual synergy of Lucas' eventual death and the Star Wars property when it happens. Especially if it happens while George is working on one of those sequels.

      I think we're stuck with the eventual reality of three more Star Wars films.. just pray to God they get produced by someone else.

    10. Re:Too Old by rjelks · · Score: 1

      ...or it takes Lucas another 20 years. Then he could just cg all of the characters. I bet by then they could have a cg that could act better than Mark Hammel anyway. -

    11. Re:Too Old by ozbird · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, his more recent comment was that he "Never really had a story" for the final trilogy.

      That didn't seem to stop him making Episodes I, II and III. Unfortunately.

    12. Re:Too Old by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I feel the same way about the Lord of the Rings films. It's the attention to detail that put hobbits on my screen with painstakingly perfect makup, expressions, clothes and dialog in beautiful settings. And it is scenes like that which made those films into a true fantasy. It wasn't just the efforts of Peter Jackson, director of "Meet the Feebles."

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    13. Re:Too Old by CaptainBaz · · Score: 1

      Nonsense - Christopher Lee (Saruman in LOTR, Dooku in Star Wars Eps 1 & 2) turns 82 this year, and he actually runs around acting, rather than sitting in a chair shouting at people, and writing woeful dialogue, which is essentially George Lucas's role.

      Sure, the main actors from the original trilogy have aged 25 years or so, but if the new trilogy were set 25-30 years after ROTK, your problems are solved.

    14. Re:Too Old by floppy+ears · · Score: 2, Funny

      I predict we'll see Episodes VII, VIII, and IX someday, no matter what George Lucas says now. And we'll probably see other movies as well. (I'd like to see some "Jedi Academy" movies.)

      Totally. If not sooner, then the day after Lucas dies his heirs will sell the rights to the Star Wars universe for $1 billion (or so) to Fox and they'll start making the movies again. They won't stop until Episode XVII (or so).

      And then after they've gotten every last dollar out of the movie seriies, they'll turn it into a 3d TV show for our grandkids. Or our grandkids' pets. Or something.

      --

      "If I could live to be several hundred
      I could take a walk and really wander, really wonder."
    15. Re:Too Old by geekoid · · Score: 1

      If George takes a Tip from peter, then he could film all three movies in 2-3 years.

      All the hub-bub around the star wars movies when they came out involved these four things:
      1) 9 Movies
      2) The story is being told by the droids
      3) Anakin turned to the dark side so the emperor would fall.
      4) Anakin gets into a fight with Obi-Wan. The result is Anakins disfigurment, and the birth of Darth Vader

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    16. Re:Too Old by Chibi · · Score: 1
      I'd like to see some "Jedi Academy" movies.


      "A Senator-elect, eager to make good on a campaign promise to increase-the-peace, waives entry requirements for the Jedi. The result: mishap, mayhem and mismanagement, as the Force is flooded with bumbling buffoons, idealistic idiots, and quixotic quipsters. The Dark Side never had it so good."

      I suggest that they hire Michael Winslow to play a role of a young (well, he's old now) padawan whose mastery of the Force gives him the ability to perform a variation of the Jedi mind trick using sound effects. The highlight of the movie in the eyes of many is when Mr. Winslow tricks some Stormtroopers into thinking he is armed with a lightsaber simply by using sound effects and Watto's iridescent butt.

      --
      If all you have are silver bullets, everything looks like a werewolf.
    17. Re:Too Old by letdownjournals · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd like to see some "Jedi Academy" movies.

      Me too. But only if they're screwball teen sex comedies.

    18. Re:Too Old by xaaronx · · Score: 1

      Offtopic, but . . .
      Do you know what a screwball comedy is?
      I'm serious. One of the defining elements is a substitution of wit for overt sexiness, due to the Hays Code in effect when the classic screwball comedies were made (1934 through WWII, with a few stragglers coming in through the war years). A "teen sex comedy" pretty much can't be a screwball.

      --
      It's amazing how much "mature wisdom" resembles being too tired. - Robert Anson Heinlein
    19. Re:Too Old by CvD · · Score: 1

      On the gripping hand

      Funny that you use 'gripping hand'. I wonder how many people recognize it. I'm just reading 'The Moat Around Murcheson's Eye' now. Excellent book.

    20. Re:Too Old by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Well, this is slashdot after all. Plenty of people are bound to be scifi nuts, and especially those reading a star wars article.

    21. Re:Too Old by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you realize how stupid you sound?

  32. ...but he can use the Chewbacca Defense... by axis-techno-geek · · Score: 1
    Seeing how he is "Chewbacca", I'm sure he could get out of that contract using the Chewbacca Defense ;)

    --
    This is not the sig line you are looking for... -- Old Jedi Sig Line Trick
  33. Re:0h n000!!!1 m0re 5h17 fr0m Luc455 70 cum....... by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 1

    I hope you weren't suggesting that they call it "Star Wars Forever..." We all know what that does to the development process...

    --
    True story.
  34. Re:w00t! by gmezero · · Score: 1

    But absolutely NONE of the post episode 6 books are canon. In fact as we've seen 4-6 are apparently no longer canon either. No, if we see 7, 8, & 9. Then there will need to be a re-edit/issue of 1-6 to correct for all of the new continuity issues added to the story.

    I'm still pissed over the Stat Wars newspaper strip that ran around 1978/79 which was called cannon at the time and apparently one of the only works given Lucas' story blessing. This strip documented the clone wars and the adventures of C3PO and R2-D2 with Obi-Wan pre-episode 6. All of that story was trashed... why?

  35. Times running out by Greif · · Score: 1

    At the current rate at which these movies are being made, George has little time left to make 3 more episodes. Unless 7, 8 and 9 are made all at once (ala the LOTR trilogy) you can forget about George Lucas making the final 3 films.

    1. Re:Times running out by CrankyFool · · Score: 1

      Not really.

      John Huston directed his last movie at 81. Bernardo Bertolucci's still making movies at 63. Kubrick directed his last movie at 71. Bogdanovich is still going strong at 65.

      Lucas is 60. The big wait between IV-VI and I-III was because, allegedly, he waited until the tech got better. Is there anything in CG that we can't do anymore? It felt like the bottleneck in I-III was not CG capability but, well, directorial prowess (and the story sucked too) -- so he could start on Eps VII-IX say, two years from now. Two years per movie would land us at 2012, when he'd be 66 which isn't really all that old... especially given that he's been eating stem cells to keep young, healthy, and strong.

    2. Re:Times running out by EricWright · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You say Lucas is 60 now (that's in 2004)... if so, then how will he be 66 in 2012, *eight* years from now?

    3. Re:Times running out by CrankyFool · · Score: 1

      Probably the whole "suck at math" thing.

    4. Re:Times running out by rjelks · · Score: 1

      Maybe he was trying to subtract with Roman Numerals.

      -

    5. Re:Times running out by wildsurf · · Score: 1

      You say Lucas is 60 now (that's in 2004)... if so, then how will he be 66 in 2012, *eight* years from now?

      Too many jumps to hyperspace, I'd wager.

      --
      Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
    6. Re:Times running out by stwrtpj · · Score: 1
      You say Lucas is 60 now (that's in 2004)... if so, then how will he be 66 in 2012, *eight* years from now?

      Lucas wants the special effects for the next movie to be so incredibly realistic that he's sinking all the money from his company into a real spacecraft so he can film scenes, in effect, on location. On some recent test runs of his spacecraft, he got a little carried away and got too close to the speed of light. "I hate it when my time gets dialated like that," he was quoted as saying.

      --
      Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
  36. hehehe .. well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    speaking as one who Knows, i can safely say that this isn't true

  37. Three thoughts by Otter · · Score: 1

    1) I appreciate the spoiler notice, but perhaps a little more insulation between spoiler warning and spoiler would be in order?

    2) Fortunately, learning who will be wearing the wookie suit barely qualifies as a spoiler. If the news was that Lucas was going to be suing everyone posting inane "Chewbacca defense" comments in SCO stories (for crying out loud, it wasn't even funny on South Park), that'd be news.

    3) Sorry to burst the British bubbles, but you're not finding "Hot Dog" on any US newsstand except for the gimmicky superinternational stands in a handful of cities. Most of us remember "Hot Dog" as the magazine for kids too young to read "Dynamite".

    1. Re:Three thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hot dog is what the man next door called what he made me play with.

  38. Let us never forget... by StressGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The never ending "Police Academy" holocost

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
  39. By the time they come out... by thefinite · · Score: 1

    They could just have Mayhew grow out his hair and skip the makeup all together. It will also be the right shade of grey for playing an old Wookie.

    After enjoying the accelerated release schedule of the Matrix and Lord of the Rings trilogies, it feels like I should expect a glacier to show up at the local theater before number 7 does.

    --
    Boom Shanka
  40. This just goes to prove by Redmage5 · · Score: 1

    that Americans are reluctant to pick up British food... even if its a Hot Dog.

  41. contest by Savatte · · Score: 1

    So which will suck more, Episode 3 or Matrix Revolutions? Vegas has 3 to 2 on Revolutions

  42. I can hardly think of anything worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to think Star Wars 3-5 where amazing...now I think of them of some sort of fluke.
    I cant imagine anyone taking Lucas seriously these days. Cant he see that all that CGI looks like one massive cartoon..take a look at Jar Jar for example. I wonder if Lucas thought Rodger Rabbit consisted soley of unkown actors.

  43. It just won't be the same if not... by milkman_matt · · Score: 4, Funny
    The actor who played Chewbacca in the original Star Wars trilogy, Peter Mayhew, will be in Episode III.

    Well I would HOPE SO! If anyone but Peter Mayhew played Chewbacca I just don't think it would pass... I mean, it takes some serious talent to walk around in a big furry costume for a while... And while they're at it they better get the same people for C3P0 and Vader or this movie just won't quite work!

    -matt

    1. Re:It just won't be the same if not... by grub · · Score: 1


      Oh man.. almost had Pepsi out the nose.. well done!

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    2. Re:It just won't be the same if not... by Fjord · · Score: 1

      Taht was pretty funny, but I don't think anyone can do the voice for Darth Vader, blackest brother in the galaxy, Nubian god, other than James Earl Jones.

      --
      -no broken link
    3. Re:It just won't be the same if not... by milkman_matt · · Score: 1
      Taht was pretty funny, but I don't think anyone can do the voice for Darth Vader, blackest brother in the galaxy, Nubian god, other than James Earl Jones.

      ...What's a nubian? (heh, jk, but I got the reference) Anyhow, that is VERY true, but if they replaced the dude in the suit I doubt anyone would give a damn. :)

      -matt

    4. Re:It just won't be the same if not... by Nintendork · · Score: 1
      "And while they're at it they better get the same people for C3P0..."

      They did. Link

      -Lucas

    5. Re:It just won't be the same if not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'What's a nubian?', Bitch, you almost make me laugh.

    6. Re:It just won't be the same if not... by fallen1 · · Score: 1
      And while they're at it they better get the same people for C3P0....

      Yeah, I would say they need to considering Anothony Daniels is THE reason C3PO is as fucking funny as he is. I have met Anthony in real life (at DragonCon in 1998 and 2000 or 2001) and he is just as funny in person as he is while performing. So, yeah, the original actors would be best to have back. Don't you agree?

      --

      Dream as if you'll live forever.
      Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
      ~Anonymous~

  44. Peter Mayhew shouldn't get his hopes up. by FeetOfStinky · · Score: 1

    Why bother with real, human actors in Episodes 7-9 when Lucas can just CGI all the main characters? I mean, come on, digital Jar-Jar, digital ewoks, digital Chewbacca... it's the wave of the future! - albeit a future from long, long ago, in a galaxy far, far away.

  45. Aren't most of the actors kind of old? by MrDigital · · Score: 1

    I agree with the fellow who mentioned Zahn's trilogy.. unfortunately, however, it focuses on the characters from eps 4-6, which are now 25 years older than they were. (And in the case of a couple of them, full of psychiatric disorders)

    I'm not sure where Lucas could go with 7-9, but if it's anywhere near 1-3 he should just stop while he's behind.

    --
    In a digital world there can be only one..
    The one, the only, MrDigital.
  46. Heir to the Empire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would not mind seeing sequels made from Heir to the Empire. Admiral Thrawn kicked some rebel butt without requiring props such as the force.

  47. Chewbacca? Now there's an irreplaceable actor! by Gramie2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't understand it. Surely any of the actors playing a character whose face is hidden and voice isn't used (i.e. Chewbacca, R2D2, or Darth Vader) is completely dispensable. Why is it such a big deal to keep Peter Mahew? The only qualification for someone replacing him would be height!

  48. Good work.... but it doesn't resolve!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  49. Mark Hammil responds... by TrollBridge · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Oh thank God! I'll may yet eat another meal that wasn't first deposited in a dumpster!"

    --
    There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
    1. Re:Mark Hammil responds... by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1

      You do realize that Hammil is actually fairly successful as a voice actor, right? He's played the Joker in the animated Batman series ever since the first episode.

    2. Re:Mark Hammil responds... by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 1

      I also heard he drew porno comics, although I'm too lazy to look anythign up about it right now.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    3. Re:Mark Hammil responds... by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He's also been quite successful on the stage. A CNN article a few months back had him saying that he was very happy with the distance he's created between Star Wars and the rest of his very-well established career as an entertainer. Not that he's not proud of his earlier work, but it's not the kind of thing an actor wants to hang his hat on forever.

    4. Re:Mark Hammil responds... by SkankhodBeeblebrox · · Score: 2, Funny

      And remember, he was in Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back too!! :P

    5. Re:Mark Hammil responds... by mongoks · · Score: 1

      So was Carrie Fisher... I think Kevin Smith must be a huge Star Wars fan.

    6. Re:Mark Hammil responds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      • Not that he's not proud of his earlier work, but it's not the kind of thing an actor wants to hang his hat on forever.

      Why wouldn't he?

  50. nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    contract stipulations like that (I must appear in a sequel) are very common, and don't indicate a sequel is in the works.

    My cousin was a small-time actor for a few years, and almost all of his contracts had clauses like that, but it really didn't mean much

  51. Re:This is flamebait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. You fail it. So hardcore.

  52. TheForce? by SpamJunkie · · Score: 1

    How can we trust TheForce.net? Aren't they owned by Lucas?

    Wouldn't that make them highly filtered by Lucas' cronies?

    Seems like looking to ABC for Disney spoilers.

  53. CA$H by Malicious · · Score: 4, Informative
    Incase any of you didn't know, regardless of how much you/we think EP I & II may have sucked, they still raked in a wack of cash domestically:
    Episode I: $431,088,295
    Episode II: $310,675,583

    I think what we're seeing here are at least + 741,000,000 reasons Lucas is considering 7,8,9.

    --
    01101001001000000110000101101101001000000110001001 10000101110100011011010110000101101110
    1. Re:CA$H by Dielectric · · Score: 1

      Oh, but note the drop in revenue from I to II. To me, ~$120M is a lot of money.

      My take is that everyone went to see Ep-I, a lot of people though it sucked and didn't see Ep-II. I wonder if we'll see another drop for Ep-III because EP-II sucked so hard? And will the resulting drop be enough to make Lucas stop the madness?

      In my world, there is nothing but A New Hope, Empire, and Jedi. Everything else is crap, including those nasty little Clone Wars cartoons. C'mon, I love Samurai Jack, but those little vignettes were icky.

    2. Re:CA$H by Boing · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Episode I: $431,088,295
      Episode II: $310,675,583

      You're still right, but I'd like to clarify something... Ep 1 had a budget of $115,000,000. Ep 2 had a budget of $120,000,000. Not exactly chump change. They were both extremely profitable, but you should factor the cost of making movies of this magnitude.

      Still, the fact that they were that profitable despite the fact that I and everyone I know thinks that they're an affront to the quality of the original trilogy tells me something important (though hardly a new idea): fans of the original trilogy are no longer the target audience of the Star Wars franchise.

      Lucas isn't pleasing us these days because he's not trying to please us. And at those numbers, I can hardly blame him. Empire Strikes Back, my personal favorite, had grossed $290,158,751 as of May '97 (source). If Episode 2 grosses more in one year than Episode 5 grossed in seventeen, the old formula is a hard sell.

    3. Re:CA$H by Krieger · · Score: 1

      And I certainly hope in your little world that it is the original letterboxed editions, before Lucas got to "re-release" to "fix" them. I own the newer editions, having bought them in fan-boy haste, only to have never watched them because of the reviews that I read. I just can't make myself watch Greedo shoot first. Or any of that other crap. Better go check ebay for the originals in LaserDisc format...

    4. Re:CA$H by AgentUSA · · Score: 5, Interesting

      But when you adjust for inflation:

      Star Wars - $979 million
      The Empire Strikes Back - $547 million
      Return of the Jedi - $524 million
      The Phantom Menace - $475 million
      Attack of the Clones - $310 million

    5. Re:CA$H by cnkeller · · Score: 1
      Oh, but note the drop in revenue from I to II. To me, ~$120M is a lot of money.

      If i recall correctly, Ep II wasn't released in the same number of theaters as Ep I. I think it was a combination of the DLP requirements and the licensing requirements that it be shown on the largest screen, in the best theater, for a minimum number of weeks. This was different than the reqs for Ep I which ended up having a much wider release.

      Personally I thought it was a good movie, but then again, I thought Ep I did a good job setting the stage for the next five movies as well....

      --

      there are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots

    6. Re:CA$H by kisrael · · Score: 1

      For Star Wars, is that first release, or including the re-releases? Which is what they did before the advent of the VCR...

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    7. Re:CA$H by Dielectric · · Score: 1

      Ugh, the Greedo dilemma. And don't even get me started on the guns-to-radios thing in E.T.

      What a bunch of wimps we've all become.

    8. Re:CA$H by debrain · · Score: 1

      I think what we're seeing here are at least + 741,000,000 reasons Lucas is considering 7,8,9.

      Yes, but not a single one of those reasons is worth a good cup of coffee...

    9. Re:CA$H by Krieger · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I find the "editorializatoin" of movies to be quite frustrating. It means that I may never be able to find the original version of movie or show that I watched, due to some dementia by a studio or producer.

      Though I would contend that it doesn't make us wimps, just freaky purists. If you consider all of the common intellect that has been wasted on the Star Wars universe, you'll note that a whole lot of people came up with relatively similar viewpoint of it. And for whatever reason Lucas's vision and what several hundred million other people took away from it are pretty damn divergent.

    10. Re:CA$H by bmajik · · Score: 1

      i dont care how good or bad a movie is.. i want as many movies as possible to make as much money as possible to move "Titanic" down the list as far as possible.

      I'd willingly have explosive diareahh for days (sp) if i could cover all persons involved in the Titanic project.

      http://maddox.xmission.com/titanic.html

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    11. Re:CA$H by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thank god the lord of the rings trilogy has pulled in over two billion in box office so far - at least Quality movies make money, too

      EP1 was garbage
      EP2 was garbage
      EP3 is gonna Be garbage

      hell, return of the jedi wasn't really good, either .. fucking ewoks

    12. Re:CA$H by WNight · · Score: 1

      However, if you didn't grow up with the originals and aren't biased towards them, you probably don't see much difference between the editions. Yeah the Greedo thing is stupid, but so was the rest of the movie.

      And one addition actually helped, the extra "stuff" wandering about the city when Luke and Obi Wan get there. In the original it didn't seem all that wild and crazy, certainly not enough to deserve the way they talk about it, but in the new edition it actually looks exciting and dangerous.

    13. Re:CA$H by AgentUSA · · Score: 1

      I looked it up and it includes re-releases. Here's the list.

    14. Re:CA$H by freeweed · · Score: 1

      If Episode 2 grosses more in one year than Episode 5 grossed in seventeen, the old formula is a hard sell.

      ESB was released in 1980, and I'm not even old enough to have paid for my own movie ticket then. What were tickets back then, $1-2? Today we're paying $10-15 a ticket. I sure as hell HOPE a movie released today can make several times what a 24 year old movie made, seeing as tickets are an order of magnitude more expensive.

      Oh, and before everyone jumps on the "17 years of profits" bandwagon, please note that ESB wasn't exactly a first run movie for those 17 years. As I recall, it was released only twice on a large scale.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    15. Re:CA$H by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when was star wars released? 1977? 27 years ago?
      attack of the clones came out 20 months ago.

    16. Re:CA$H by SEE · · Score: 1

      Now, now, it wasn't all bad. The restored Jabba scene in A New Hope (Harrison Ford talking to a CGI Jabba) was quite worthwhile.

    17. Re:CA$H by mraymer · · Score: 1

      Could someone put this information into an arbitrary value such as ticket sales? Number of tickets sold would be a far more accurate estimate of the sucess of a movie.

      --

      "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

    18. Re:CA$H by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but at $5 / cup, all of those single reasons combined are worth 148.2 million cups. More than I'll ever drink.

  54. Forget Chewbacca, give me Han Solo by tentimestwenty · · Score: 1

    Just give me a Harrison Ford cameo and all will be well.

  55. the good ol' gang back? by mac666er · · Score: 1

    Ok so this shouldn't be bad news at all...

    Don't get me wrong, I think Lucas is a terrible writer since 1977. However, I grew up with these movies and *the one* thing that I always wanted to see is the future of whatever happened after episode VI.

    Of course there are tons of novels and comics... but ... isn't it a little bit interesting to just imagine SEEING Han, Leia and all the gang as good ol' pals? That can only happen in a movie...

    But of course.. I wouldn't expect much from the story or other *NEW* Characters.

    Would u think Carrie is that hot with so many wrinkles and overwight?.. Well after all she had to take care of a reckless ex-smuggler... well.. at least we know Han (Harrison) is IN SHAPE =P

    Just my two cents

    1. Re:the good ol' gang back? by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      I would hope to see NEW characters and NEW stuff instead of the same old people.

      Lucas specifically stated at one point that he wanted the actors to be aged for the sequels. So I think it would be Luke in Yoda's role. Leia is Chancellor (this happens in the books), Han is probably an old geiser, Lando is a businessman, etc... They'll be dealing with a new generation of actors. Perhaps with one of Han and Leia's kids (or grandkids).

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  56. Biggest Problem with Star Wars by Turd+Rippleton · · Score: 0


    ... George Lucas

    ~Turd

  57. The Death Script by Dracolytch · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I felt a great disturbance in movie buffs... as if millions of viewers suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced."

    Most likely their own organs went into revolt. Geeks everywhere left Episode II with their brains subconciously chanting: "If you are so stupid to watch the next one, I will KILL YOU!"

    ~D

    --
    This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    1. Re:The Death Script by M.C.+Hampster · · Score: 1

      It's more like a million geeks on Slashdot making the same "millions of viewers/readers/geeks" joke at the same time.

      --
      Forget the whales - save the babies.
  58. Better fit in with the EU... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I really would like an episode 7, 8, or 9, if it contradicts practically everything in the EU I am going to be VERY annoyed. A trilogy based on the Thrawn trilogy would be awesome, or the New Jedi Order (but alas, the New Jedi Order is some 19 books long, so I doubt they'll make THAT many movies).

    I hope its based on Zhan's Thrawn trilogy, or is original (but fitts in with the other Expanded Universe books).

  59. Re:Too Fat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mark Hamill wouldn't even fit into his costume with his belly!

  60. Is this like sports contracts? by mighty_mallards · · Score: 1

    This could be like a baseball player, like Jack Wilson - SS for the Pirates, having a clause written into his contract that includes a bonus for winning World Series MVP. Does this mean it is even remotely likely that is going to happen? Much as we like Jack here in Pgh - there's no way.

    --
    You find this humorous, centurion?
  61. Please tell me you're kidding... by sczimme · · Score: 1


    pleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepl easepleasepleasepleasepleasewithsprinkles on top.

    Oh, the heck with it - I don't care. I'm going outside.

    :-)

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    1. Re:Please tell me you're kidding... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, go outside and then come back and brag about it. It's fucking 6 degrees here ( that's -14.5 to you celsius people).

  62. SFX by CuriHP · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can only hope that Lucas will at some point realize that special effects cannot save a bad story. Especially when everything is in gharish cartooney colors.

    --
    If it's not on fire, it's a software problem.
    1. Re:SFX by milkman_matt · · Score: 1
      I can only hope that Lucas will at some point realize that special effects cannot save a bad story.

      I'm glad to hear someone else say it... Personally, I think CG is good when used in EXTREME moderation.. now that CG is around it gives directors a reason to be lazy... "Oh it doesn't look right? we'll touch it up in post production" f' that, I remember hearing something on a show about Star Trek that they were using painted metal pipes, broomsticks, hairbrushes, all sorts of every day things to create texture and stuff on the enterprise, now they'd just leave that spot blank and put something fancy on it with CG.. The funny part is, it looked more realistic when it was a painted hairbrush than whatever crap they'd put in it's place using CG! Personally, I LIKED how in EPI&II you could see through the black spots in the XWing/Snow Speeders if you looked close enough.. most people didn't even notice it, but they were able to pull it off without any fancy CG work.. It doesn't HAVE to be perfect, those little imperfections give it character, and they usually go totally unnoticed anyways. Did Lucas forget how to be creative? Er, wait, stupid question.

      -matt

  63. Re:wh3r3'5 73h 53qu3l w3 w4n7????/ by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 1

    Forget the movie, where are the Spaceballs lunch box, breakfast cereal, toliet paper, window/LCD monitors, and flame throwers they promised us?

    --
    True story.
  64. didya hear that? by EvilStein · · Score: 4, Funny

    It was the sound of millions of Star Wars fans yelling "Can we FINALLY see Jar Jar DIE? Please!?" :P

    1. Re:didya hear that? by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      I think the ultimate act of directorial competence would be to somehow find a way to make everyone like Jar-Jar in the third movie and then have him die in some tragic yet heroic way.

      Oh, and the irony would be just peachy.

      Of course, to pull that coup off we are talking about a fantastic display of the talents of a well seasoned director with skill, vision, and insight into the minds of the viewer...

      But this is Lucas we are talking about, which means we will probably just have Jar-Jar doing prattfalls and fart noises up until the closing credits. Sad...

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  65. Chewbacca Strikes Back? by H8X55 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "The actor who played Chewbacca in the original Star Wars trilogy, Peter Mayhew, will be in Episode III. Of course, this has been previously reported and comes as no surprise. However, TheForce is reporting that Mayhew's contract contains a stipulation that he must also appear in Episodes 7, 8, and 9.

    Why bother with him then? If ever a character could be played by someone else it would be Chewbacca! No recognizable voice, or face, or anything. Just a 6'6" guy in a wookie costume with sound effects added in after the fact. I don't mean to be rude to Mr. Mayhew, but what leveridge does he have?

    1. Re:Chewbacca Strikes Back? by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      You've apparently never seen Mayhew. He's a very distinctive looking fellow and regardless of who does the make-up, Chewie doesn't look like other Wookies because of who is under the make-up.

    2. Re:Chewbacca Strikes Back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least Mr Mayhew can probably spell the word "leverage".

    3. Re:Chewbacca Strikes Back? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Star Wars purists would notice the differnce. Hey, I'm still pissed that they didn't use David Prowse as a body double for Anakin in movies 1 and 2!

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    4. Re:Chewbacca Strikes Back? by limekiller4 · · Score: 1

      H8X55 writes:
      "I don't mean to be rude to Mr. Mayhew, but what leveridge does he have?"

      Leveridge? Why, none at all...

      --
      My .02,
      Limekiller
    5. Re:Chewbacca Strikes Back? by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      But, I have seen him die on Celebrity Deathmatch.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  66. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Star Wars. What's that about? Is it good, or it whack?

  67. Chewbacca's speech by aquabat · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apparently, there will be a scene in episode VII where Chewbacca addresses the governing council on Cashyyyk. Mr Lucas is developing a Wookie language expressly for this purpose. The grammar and vocabulary will be available before the release so that die hard fans can follow along without reading the subtitles.

    --
    A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
    1. Re:Chewbacca's speech by jubei · · Score: 1

      Wow, I can see how that is "Informative". ;)

      No, really. It ought to be quite a dramatic cinematic event too, considering that even R2D2 has 10 times the vocal range as the wooky?

    2. Re:Chewbacca's speech by aquabat · · Score: 1
      Thank you.

      I was beginning to wonder if everyone here had lost their reality anchor.

      --
      A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
  68. Re:d1d j00 h34r 74h7!!!???// by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 1

    Actually, I've found numerous depictions of him dying around the Internet. All somewhat satisfying.

    But I'd really rather not see him die in the movie, I'd much rather take place in the killing of the root of all stupidity myself. A nice hands-on experience.

    --
    True story.
  69. Just don't direct them! by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
    George should provide an outline of what he wants to happen and then let others take over to write and direct.

    Not only that, but he should cut down on the bluescreen stuff and get back to having actors actually film sceens together as opposed to piecing it together digitally afterwards.

    Finally, he should get rid of references to american pop culture. No cheesy race announcers bantering back and forth and no robotic football games happening in the background. Oh, and Dean Kamen wants his Segway back, since most of the 'droids in Ep2 resemble it in someway.

  70. 7,8 & 9 by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny
    TheForce is reporting that Mayhew's contract contains a stipulation that he must also appear in Episodes 7, 8, and 9.

    Nothing a few million $ couldn't rectify.

    So what would Episodes 7-9 be like...

    <Daydream Sequence>

    Star Wars, Episode 7: A New Threat
    Synopsis: Luke and Leia get married and head off on a honeymoon, leaving Han Solo and Chewbacca to watch over selection of the new senate. Han Solo gets bored and starts hyperspace download site of music and video content against the wishes of the immensely powerful IGRIMPAA (Inter Galactic Recording Industry and Motion Picture Artists Association), a thinly veiled group of thugs and bandits who have kept entertainers in thrall. Big cruisers appear out of hyperspace around Coruscant and Jar Jar Bings, in their employe serves subpoenas, furthering audience animosity.

    Star Wars, Episode 8: Just An Awufl Mess
    Synopsis: Luke and Leia return to Coruscant and find the IGRIMPAA firmly running things, Han Solo and Chewbacca rotting in prison and several worlds in outright rebellion. Luke procedes to reform a Jedi council, but finds space cruiser bombs going off all over the place. President Jar Jar Binks attempts to alay Luke's concerns, until it's found Leia has an ePod loaded with bootleg tunes from Naboo. Jar Jar reveals well kept secret that he is master of dark side and cuts off Luke's other hand in epic lightsabre battle. Han and Chewy come to rescue and all flee to the a distant world only to find another massive Deathstar built with IGRIMPAA profits.

    Star Wars, Episode 9: Last of the Red-Hot Jedi
    Synopsis: Luke and Leia's child, Xyzzy, demonstrates great skill with the force and greater skill with the source, hacks into DeathStar and shuts it down, in a bit of a special effects let-down, just see big ball with lights go out, no explosion. Luke and Leia return to Coruscant, along with Han and Chewbacca and in a final battle Luke duels with Jar Jar, both slice each other in half and last threat is brought to an end, except for offspring of Skywalkers, who demonstrates a slight inclination to power and position and a bit of an angry streak. We've been here before, no?

    </Daydream Sequence>

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:7,8 & 9 by Christianfreak · · Score: 1

      The only problem with that is the blatent insest. I mean some people are into that sort of thing but not the general public ... :)

    2. Re:7,8 & 9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You know, if Jar Jar was to become a Sith Knight it just might save the series.


      And no, you can't kill Jar Jar without killing Lucas. You see, into Jar Jar that Lucas has poured his hatred, his malice, his incompetance, and his absoute desire to alienate millions of fans. Jar Jar and Lucas are one and the same.

  71. thank you microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we have microsoft to thank for this, as the windows will be used for rendering the CGI.

    Nothing else has the capability

  72. Re:d1d j00 h34r 74h7!!!???// by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    Heh. Imagine if they made that into a contest - "You can play the part of the stormtrooper that whacks Jar Jar Binks!"

    It'd be *huge* ;)

  73. Quick Ammendment by notcreative · · Score: 2, Funny

    A few typos; it should have read:

    Star Wars Episode 7: Beating the Cash Cow
    Star Wars Episode 8: Milking a Dead Horse
    Star Wars Episode 9: If There Were A God, It Would Have Stopped Already

    1. Re:Quick Ammendment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Star Wars Episode 9: If There Were A God, It Would Have Stopped Already

      That's a logical fallacy. SW:Episode IX is a prime example of how men use God-given free will to cause evil. (or in this case E-vile)

  74. Dialogue for Episode III: by kjdames · · Score: 5, Funny
    Peter Jackson: Your powers are weak, old man.

    George Lucas: You can't win, Peter. If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.

    C-3PO: R2 says that the chances of episodes 7-9 surviving are 725 to 1. Actually R2 has been known to make mistakes... from time to time... Oh dear...

    C-3PO: Sir, the possibility of successfully extending this series is approximately 3,720 to 1!

    Lucas: Never tell me the odds!

    --

    Typos... that's just how I role.

    1. Re:Dialogue for Episode III: by cactopus · · Score: 1

      How do I set my laser printer on stun?

      Wouldn't it be better if it was How do I set my Xerox Phaser on Stun?

    2. Re:Dialogue for Episode III: by kjdames · · Score: 0

      No!

      --

      Typos... that's just how I role.

  75. These stories will come after the "New Jedi Order" by Warlock7 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Episodes 7, 8 and 9 are supposed to deal with a character that is supposed to be introduced in Episode 3. These episodes will take place after the New Jedi Order series. That allows for Lucas to use the original stars (Mark Hamill, Harrison Ford, Carrie Fisher, Peter Mayhew, etc.) and place them into the timeline approximately 30 years after A New Hope which is right around the end of the Yuuzhan Vong series (NJO). This is perfect. In 2007 these performers will be 30 years older than they were when they took the roles in the first place. This gives a lot of credibility to the whole concept.

  76. spoiler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop reading if you're spoiler paranoid.

    Luke Skywalker kills his father Darth Vader.

  77. can't anyone play Chewbacca? by Barbarian · · Score: 1

    All you need is a tall guy to stick in a dog suit. He has to go "Rawwwr!" once in a while. Or is the original actor the only one who can do that properly?

    1. Re:can't anyone play Chewbacca? by ccwaterz · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? Here's a leaked casting pic.

    2. Re:can't anyone play Chewbacca? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone can play Chewbacca.

      Only John Candy can play Mog.

  78. There *ARE* no sequels planned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lucas has stated publicly and repeatedly that there never were plans for Episodes 7-8-9. The arc of the story works out in six parts. That's it. The old 9-part cycle story goes back to some erroneous newspaper reporting in the 1970s, and was NEVER true. Lucas has said this in many a public forum over and over and over.

    Besides, the story really has nowhere to go for the purposes of film. Sure there's plenty of lousy books out there that tell some poorly conceived stories beyond Episode 6. The only good sequel series was the original "Heir To The Empire" series by Timothy Zahn back in 1991. (Once "Truce at Bakura" hit the shelves it was all over....)

    But look, the Empire is defeated. The Death Star destroyed, the Republic is restored. The story is over. What else is there worth telling on a the big screen?

    And judging by Lucas' skill with stor concepts these days, I really don't want any more Star Wars movies after Episode three is complete. Lucas has made a bad judgement call by choosing to direct. He was good with ANH, but made the right call by having Irving Kershner direct ESB.

    His direction in Phantom Menanace and Attack of Clones has been abysmal, the performances of the "actors" only moreso (in part because the dialog they've been given is atrocious) and the plot has been sadly sub-par all around. He needs serious creative help to salvage the one last chapter of the series if he has any hope of salvaging his reputation as a maker of epic sci fi films.

    Let's get the job -- such as it is -- over with and let the good bits and the bad bits (we know which is which) take their rightful place in film history. Lucas should produce and never never never direct a film or write dialog again, especially if its a series of Star Wars sequels.

    Just my little rant of the moment.

    1. Re:There *ARE* no sequels planned by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      Actually, in early issues of "Bantha Tracks", a Star Wars fan newsletter you got when you joined the fan club back in the day, he was quoted as saying that it was a nine part story arc. So, your recollection is a little bit off. He did start changing what he said after the release of the prequels though. Episodes 7, 8, 9 will follow the Yuuzhan Vong stories of the New Jedi Order.

    2. Re:There *ARE* no sequels planned by gothzilla · · Score: 1

      I used to get Bantha Tracks, and yes there were a few articles about all 9 stories. I think one of them actually gave a very brief description of each story. I remember this well because as a skinny geek when geeks weren't cool yet, it was one of the few chances I ever had to be cool because I knew what all the stories were going to be about. :o)

  79. More SW Movies? by JMcJames · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see what Triumph the Insult Comic Dog thinks of that!

    http://www.nbc.com/nbc/Late_Night_with_Conan_O'B ri en/video/triumph.shtml
    (Hit the "Triumph Visits the 'Star Wars' Nerds Part One" link at the bottom)

  80. Trash the whole franchise, yeah! by Cranx · · Score: 1

    Alright! If they make Star Wars 7, 8 and 9 that means that the MAJORITY of the Star Wars movies will suck ass! Get it done quickly Lucas and Co., so I can *not* waste my money in the theaters! I'm really looking forward to disdaining them!

  81. Re:w00t! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Episodes 7-9 would not be part of the Extended Universe would they?

    I was under the impression that episodes 7-9 were at least outlined by Lucas just as 1-3 were before they made #4.

  82. Horrible, horrible, yet we can't look away by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Star Wars movies are becoming like a horrific accident scene. Terrifying and excruciatingly painful, yet we feel compelled to watch. I'd like to do a survey:

    1. What percentage of geeks expect to see EpIII?
    2. Of those going to see EpIII, what percentage expect it to be anything other than a suckfest?

    Anticipated answers:

    1. 95%
    2. 1%

    If GL makes VII-IX, you KNOW everyone is going to go. How can he pass up the chance to make that much money on what amounts to another 9 years of playing with cool toys without any need to work on boring stuff like sympathetic characters or realistic dialog?

    --
    dinner: it's what's for beer
    1. Re:Horrible, horrible, yet we can't look away by EricWright · · Score: 1

      But at least I can pay $2 6 months after the wreck and still see the carnage... unless the celluloid rots from the mound of tripe imprinted upon it.

    2. Re:Horrible, horrible, yet we can't look away by RickHunter · · Score: 1

      I dunno... The guy who directed Samurai Jack and Powerpuff Girls is doing a pretty decent job with the Clone Wars shorts. If he offs Lucas and assumes his identity, than Episode III might not be a suckfest.

    3. Re:Horrible, horrible, yet we can't look away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will most probably see Ep III. I will go grudgingly with no expecations, but I imagine hard as I try, I'll still be disappointed.

      If he tries a 7,8,9, it will need to be some pretty compelling OMG reviews to drag my ass in to see 7. At this juncture, I'm only seeing III to complete and get some closure.

      But I pretty much think that after that, I'm done.

    4. Re:Horrible, horrible, yet we can't look away by mikedaisey · · Score: 1


      Not always true--I never thought I'd skip the Matrix films, but I haven't seen the 3rd one and have no plans to, give where that franchise headed. I only saw the 2nd SW film once, which for me was very little. It can happen.

    5. Re: Horrible, horrible, yet we can't look away by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > 1. What percentage of geeks expect to see EpIII?

      After E1 I didn't bother with E2, so I think that percentage has to exclude me.

      > 2. Of those going to see EpIII, what percentage expect it to be anything other than a suckfest?

      Do we have to see it to vote?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    6. Re: Horrible, horrible, yet we can't look away by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > If he tries a 7,8,9, it will need to be some pretty compelling OMG reviews to drag my ass in to see 7.

      I suspect "OMG" is exactly the kind of reviews they would get.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  83. Best source for information by grylnsmn · · Score: 1

    One of the best sources for information on this is from TheForce.Net's boards (Link is to the spoilers board).

    Of course, I happen to moderate at those boards, so I might be a little biased.

    Kimball_Kinnison

  84. I hate to say this... by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 1

    I hate to say this, and I know my Karma will suffer for it, but as an old-timer, and with Karma to spare....

    LIKE I CARE?!?!?!

    SW went downhill from Episode 1, and I can see no way to revive it. I don't care anymore about it, and I honestly believe that most of us here could really care less about what happens with SW.

    And of course, somebody is going to mod me down as off-topic or as a troll, but I needed to get that off my chest (keyboard?)


  85. P does NOT imply Q in this case by bloggins02 · · Score: 1

    I know this is obvious, but I just wanted to point out that

    Mayhew's contract contains a stipulation that he must also appear in Episodes 7, 8, and 9

    Only says that if there is a 7, 8, or 9, then Mayhew must appear in them. It does not mean that there must be an episode 7, 8, and/or 9.

    This looks, as another poster pointed out, like a case of hedging one's bets. Nothing to see here, move along...

  86. more material for the simpsons by MoFoQ · · Score: 1

    I forgot the episode number but it's the one where Homer becomes the owner of the nuclear power plant and you see Lenny and Carl duking it out with nuclear fuel rods like lightsabers all while saying Lenny: "Phantom Menance sucked more" Carl: "I say Attack of the Clones sucked more"

    and o yea...this is meant to be a funny.

  87. Rumors by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

    I'll believe this when I see the contract for myself.

    I know that this is common knowledge, but Lucas has said repeatedly in recent years that he has not intention of doing the 'sequel' episodes.

    Though I do clearly remember several magazine interviews in 1977 and 78 where he mentioned doing all 9 stories.

    Maybe GL has had a change of heart(developed more greed?) and his PR team hasn't figured out the right time to make an announcement yet.

    Who knows?

    wbs.

    --
    Huh?
  88. Instead.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The voices in my head have switched to encrypted mp3 and I don't know the public key

    Let's get started on how the OP doesn't understand public key encryption, even though he tries to make a joke about it in his sig.

    1. Re:Instead.... by nightsweat · · Score: 1
      No let's get started how if I were the one encrypting, which I would be, if they were voices in MY head, I would need the private key to do so. Decrypting would need the public key. It's a private joke, pal.

      And then let's talk about how you don't have the balls to post as anything but an AC.

      --

      the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    2. Re:Instead.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a different AC. But I don't think you understand public key encryption.

      AC b/c I can't be bothered to log in.

    3. Re:Instead.... by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1

      I don't really want to ruin your nice little catfight but if it's a private joke what is it doing in your .sig?

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    4. Re:Instead.... by nightsweat · · Score: 1

      Where else would you put it?

      --

      the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    5. Re:Instead.... by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1

      Look as I said I don't really want to get drawn into this but when you put something on your sig you cannot dismiss criticism from comments by claiming it's a private joke. People either get it or they don't. If they don't, it's either expainable or not. In your case, it's not (your explanation makes me believe that this came about while you / your friends were drunk and / or stoned and thought it was funny. It's not).

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    6. Re:Instead.... by nightsweat · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry, I didn't realize I was giving testimony before a grand jury.

      Lighten the fuck up.

      --

      the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
    7. Re:Instead.... by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1

      Your new sig makes sense. I feel vindicated.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    8. Re:Instead.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a FUCKING idiot. You reply to a guy who is actually very relevant and quite willing to have a civilized word with you by insulting him WHILE AT THE SAME TIME changing your stupid little excuse for a sig and validating his point. You are true slashbot matterial my friend...

  89. expect Episode XVI by tuc · · Score: 1

    The next film will have to be Ep III, but the starting credits for the one after that should say Ep XVI. That way there will be throngs of hysterical fans who won't be satisfied until they've taken out their wallets and thrown money at each of the nine intervening films: VII through XV.

    --

    You write your nine symphonies, then you die.

  90. Man. by Sheepdot · · Score: 1

    Is anyone else hoping that Mace doesn't die off? If Lucas can screw up the history of Boba Fett and get away it, he might as well keep Mace Windu alive.

    1. Re:Man. by Droideka · · Score: 1

      No, man, no. Boba Fett needs to take sweet, sweet revenge on Windu.

  91. Whats Peter Mayhew doing now? by BrodyVess · · Score: 1, Interesting

    He's currently living in (huh? Where?)- population 6500. The only other claim to fame is that we have one of the few drive-in movie theaters left in existance. Mr. Mayhew (who is actually a really cool and funny guy) has spent the last few years living there and acting at the local opera house. Yea, its wierd to see Chewie walk into the middle of a Rogers and Hammerstien musical. He has a daughter who is now a freshman in college, and attended Granbury High School (Far, Above the Brazos River; Bathed in golden light!) When episode II came out she was in HS, and my younger sister tells me there was intense competition to be dating her at the time of the premier. IIRC the guy who won that sweepstakes got to go to the premier as the date of Chewies daughter...

    So yea- I'm not really surprised he has a contract for the next three. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if he has a contract for the next 387. He's getting older, the condition that made him so tall has started to really fuck with his knees, and he's doing community theater. If you were him, wouldn't you do everything to assure yourself that you'd be in on it if the next shot at residuals came along?

    I'll talk to the local town gossip tonight and see if I can't find out some more.

    --
    No one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
    1. Re:Whats Peter Mayhew doing now? by Whispers_in_the_dark · · Score: 1

      Absolutely -- I'd do the same thing if I were in his shoes. The point was, though, that we can't read much into this abuot the studio's motives as he is probably not very expensive to retain for eps 7-9. This isn't a comment on his personal acting ability as it has been my long-time belief that an actors ability and their paycheck are rarely in direct proportion (sometimes it seems it's almost inversely proportional).

    2. Re:Whats Peter Mayhew doing now? by BrodyVess · · Score: 1

      Right, I meant to imply just that- He's not doing anything in hollywood anyway, so its no big loss to him or the studio to have him under contract. Whereas, if the Governator had a clause saying he had to drop whatever he was doing whenever they decided to make Total Recall II: Spirit Returns then he'd have some issues. As it is, Mayhew might have to bow out of Pirates of Penzance.

      --
      No one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
  92. This is evidence of very little ... by Unordained · · Score: 3, Interesting

    -If- there are three more movies made, -and- they need someone to play Chewie, -then- he'll be the one to do it if still around, and he can't refuse. This in no way stipulates that they -must- make three movies, or even that they -will- ... only that he would be required to play Chewie if they ever again need someone to do so.

    It's a great way to give both actors and the audience some hope for more movies, and it lets them worry a little less about the 'how' of making more movies by already having actors lined up and contracts signed. Sheesh. Can't you boys be a little more skeptical?

    1. Re:This is evidence of very little ... by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

      Can't you boys be a little more skeptical?

      Absolutely. However, I am skeptical that they would write that into a contract without at least the intention of making the movies. It may come to pass that they don't--maybe the next one flops so hard that nobody is willing to pay for it, or put the time into it, or whatever--but I believe that at least the intention exists as of the date that contract was written.

  93. Re:Too Fat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He'll knock your cock, you bastard!

  94. I heard a disturbance by double-oh+three · · Score: 0

    I felt a great disturbance in the force, like a million geeks all crying out in horror at once.

    --
    "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
  95. Does this mean Mayhew is legally prohibited... by Samurai+Cat! · · Score: 1

    ...from *dying* in case they do decide to do 7/8/9, like, thirty years from now? :P

    That 7/8/9 appearance requirement is probably, like others have said, the studio hedging their bets. Lucas said a good while back he wasn't going to do a sequel trilogy. But, who knows - he may let others run with it at some point.

    --

    "People" using "unnecessary" quotes should be "shot".
  96. Re:Awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IT ISSEEE GOOOOOOODE!!!11

  97. The Star Wars production I REALLY want by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    I'm just waiting for another Staw Wars holiday special.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:The Star Wars production I REALLY want by BoneFlower · · Score: 1

      I want to see that... need to track down a copy somewhere...

  98. Oh No... by CCIEwannabe · · Score: 1

    Great. I was hanging for the box set of all 6 at the end of 2005. But I wasn't sure which edition to get. Normal edition, special edition, super special edition et. al. Now I have to wait for another 3 movies to be released? AHHHHH!

  99. Deduction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People don't realize.. ep. 1, 2 & 3 were supposed to piss you off. You all are missing the overarching theme of these movies, and that is that before the Empire, the universe was a really stupid and boring place... These movies are basically a testiment to how we need totalitarian government to keep our science fiction interesting!

  100. FINALY....it will all make sense by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

    when you think about it...as it stands, anakin does not balance the force.

    if Luke ends up being a good guy on the light side of the force, there is no dark side and hence no balance.

    Luke must go to the dark side...all of the foreshadowing says he must, it is the only thing that makes sense. then Leya and Han's child will be the future of the Jedi, thus brining balance to the force.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  101. Why is this a surprise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back when Star Wars first came out, Lucas openly talked about 9 total episodes.

    (Doesn't anyone remember these early interviews?)

    They were doing the middle 3, then the first 3, then the last 3.

    Now, I know, over the year, Lucas/LucasFilm has backed away from this, stating that there were only 6 total ever envisioned, but that just wasn't the case.

    I think the problem with Episodes 1 and 2 (and unfortunately 3), is casting. The actors just aren't right for the parts (with the exception of McGregor and Lee).

    You can quibble with the direction, but that's basically the director's job; put it up there and see if anyone likes his vision. I think both films could have been edited better, but they are what they are.

    I may be in the minority, but I look forward to the later episodes.

  102. What the fuck is WITH you people? by DesScorp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So Lucas may do another trilogy. Good on him. But hang on....Slashdot readers dissaprove! "He's just trying to gouge us, he's destroyed my fond childhood memories", etc, etc, lather, rinse, repeat.

    Pull your heads out of your asses. If you don't like the movies, don't go see them. Star Wars belongs to Lucas. He created it, he owns the empire, and if he wants to film himself slinging handfulls of his own shit at a Slashdot logo, and call it Episode 7, he can.

    I doubt we'll ever see those movies, but I'd like to see them get made. And I wont cry on the Internet that they're not the same as the original trilogy. Which kind of makes sense, being that the original trilogy is two decades old. People change, the industry changes, ideas change, technologies change. Get over it. Go watch Lord of the Rings again if you want purity. More than likely, some of you whining peckerwoods will be watching Yet Another Tentacle Rape Hentai flick.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    1. Re:What the fuck is WITH you people? by dvicci · · Score: 1

      Go watch Lord of the Rings again if you want purity.

      There was very little in terms of "pure" in those movies. They were good for the most part, even with all the changes made, but they weren't, by any means, "pure."

      As for the rest, I agree. I'm of the crowd that really thinks Eps. I and II just aren't that good. They both had good moments, but neither hold a candle to Eps. 4-6 for me. It's all subjective, and most likely due to the fact that I saw them all at just the right age. But the bottom line is, they belong to Lucas. He can, will, and should do with them what he wants, and he's frankly beholden to no one. He pretty much has a license to print money, so I can't imagine anything said on a /. story is going to sway him one way or another.

      --
      ] D
    2. Re:What the fuck is WITH you people? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      It's amusing to see die hard fans become increasingly bitter and trying desperatley to justify their love of Star Wars and it's even more amusing that it's their hero George who is putting them in this no win predicament.

    3. Re:What the fuck is WITH you people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually if you want to see a purity, don't go see Lord of the Rings. That whole trilogy of movies was a mockery on the source material.

      Some people refuse to admit that they have changed because that would be an admission that they are getting old.

    4. Re:What the fuck is WITH you people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're a mockery of Anonymous Cowards.

  103. I think what a lot of people are forgetting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that half the love of the Original Star Wars came from the fact that we were kids and the movie just totally blew us away. Now? Not so much.

    But posting about the guy that played CHEWBACCA?

    Oh, wait, its about Chewbacca. That IS pretty fucking cool.

    [yet another installment in the "I think what a lot of people are forgetting" series of posts.]

  104. What SW 3 has to be for me to pay money to see it by merlyn · · Score: 1
    Opening scene, big ships fly overhead (like all five other parts so far).

    Cut to interior. JarJar being tortured. He screams things like "Yousa no-ah like-uh me?"

    For 90 minutes.

    At the end, Darth Vader in his dark helmet appears. Voice over James Earl Jones says "Now, is your time, to die."

    JarJar falls over dead.

    End credits roll.

  105. If they make 7, 8, 9 by Thrymm · · Score: 1

    Pleaseeeeeeeeeeee dont direct it Lucas. I dont want Zahn's masterpiece ruined. This really would be a great trilogy. Grand Admiral Thrawn is such a great character, intelligent, patient, cunning, and down right evil against the New Republic. His 2nd in command Pelleaon is just as great. Other characters which would be kick ass on screen would be Mara Jade, Karrde, and Jourrus C'Boath!

    1. Re:If they make 7, 8, 9 by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      It'll be post NJO/Yuuzhan Vong. It won't have anything to do with the Zahn trilogy...

    2. Re:If they make 7, 8, 9 by Thrymm · · Score: 1

      Then the Empire has already won :(

  106. Regarding Horror. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > in Episodes 7, 8, and 9

    Oh, the horror.

  107. Im shocked by t0ny · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You mean that people are actually still paying attention to what Lucas is doing with Star Wars? I stopped caring after seeing the first two pieces of shit he churned out.

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    1. Re:Im shocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHA! You watched Attack of the Clones! Loser!

    2. Re:Im shocked by t0ny · · Score: 1
      Ya, Im ashamed to admit it. Not only that, but I saw it TWICE!!!

      How embarassing. The second time the bad acting almost killed me!

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  108. Preciousssss.... hyuck hyuck! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Idiot. Pee Wee Herman is obviously Gollum!

  109. The phases for each movie at Skywalker Ranch... by khrustalicious · · Score: 1

    1. Enthusiasm
    2. Disillusionment
    3. Panic
    4. Search for the Guilty
    5. Punishment of the Innocent
    6. Praise and Honor for the Non-Participants

  110. Peter is needed... by Jahat · · Score: 1

    Um, actually it isn't a suit. They found him a defunct German Circus.

    --
    Sola Scriptura Sola Fide Sola Gratia Sola Christus
    1. Re:Peter is needed... by Cosmik · · Score: 1

      If only I had mod points. :)

  111. i hate the prequels as much as the next guy... by *weasel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...but how do the prequels rape the fond memories of your childhood? I mean, sure episode 1 sucks - but episode 4 and 5 are still hella good.

    Unless you mean the prequels made you realize how lame the series already was by episode 6. How hokey episode 4 was, and how the pinnacle of the series was directed and largely rewritten by people other than Lucas. That could understandably rob you of fond memories. Of course, just watching them again older and wiser would probably have done that.

    I could also understand the anger if you were referring to the Greedo-shooting-first destruction of the original series called the 'Special Editions'. But you're not.

    my pet theory is that the special editions, and episodes 1, and 2 are precisely the kinds of movies Lucas wanted to make from the beginning.

    episode iv represented his first shot, and doubtlessly had piles of constructive criticism and rewrites. then it was proven a cash cow, and the sequel was given to a different director and featured much more rewriting. (largely hailed as the pinnacle of starwars). Then Lucas got control back, and turned out Jedi.

    After more time and money, he skull-f#cked the original trilogy with the special editions. then came episode 1 and the truth was unavoidable. episode 2 was salt on a gaping wound.

    Without actual creative criticism, Lucas just doesn't churn out the movies we always thought he wanted to make.

    It's like the Wachowskis. They probably rewrote the first Matrix a dozen times and were making huge changes even to the shooting script. But who's going to slow down the process of making sequels to a cash cow by saying 'Whoa, guys - you've got some pacing issues that need to be fixed here, and some lame ass dialogue'?

    No-one in Hollywood.

    --
    // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    1. Re:i hate the prequels as much as the next guy... by Watts+Martin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My pet theory is that the special editions and episoes 1 and 2 are precisely the kinds of movies Lucas wanted to make from the beginning.

      Yep, I've gathered that. In early drafts of the first Star Wars script, the hero is named "Anakin Starkiller" and the plot is much, much closer to The Phantom Menace. Evidently people reading the initial script told Lucas that the story was just a big, sprawling mess that needed to have a much tighter focus around a single hero, who had to really be heroic. So Lucas went off to read Joseph Campbell and reconstructed the first script using The Hero With a Thousand Faces and Campbell's "monomyth" concept as a guidebook.

      To be fair to the first trilogy, though, Lucas always had story and production control over them. Both Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi were written and directed by different people. If Lucas had written it entirely himself, it would have combined the banal dialogue of the first one with the banal story of the third, and been even worse than it was. :)

    2. Re:i hate the prequels as much as the next guy... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Actualy, he was probably refering to the fact that Lucas made changes to the core StarWars Mythos.

      actual I think it went like this:
      'Whoa, guys - you've got some pacing issues that need to be fixed here, and some lame ass dialogue'?

      'will somebody PLEASE get Mr. Reeves out of here!?'

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  112. this has always been the plan by b-lou · · Score: 1

    Making three trilogies has always been the plan.

    I remember way back in 1978 or 1979 reading in a Star Wars fan magazine that Lucas even then already had basic outlines for all three trilogies and called the whole thing the "Journal of the Whills," i believe. It said there would be two more Star Wars movies, and then if George made any more he'd start with the first trilogy. Whether or not you like the movies, i think it's pretty cool that he's carrying out plans he made all those years ago. Me, i have hard time planning dinner.

  113. 1, 2 by pastpolls · · Score: 1

    The first two films were better, or at least according to my child. Remember folks, the movies were not made for adult geeks, but 10 year old kids. I am sure by the time the last three are made I will REALLY hate them and will refuse to go because I will be a hard headed old man. But my child, and perhaps his children, will love them. One thing Lucas does really well is children's movies... not 20-50 something trying to re-live their childhood movies.

  114. Re:06.04 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    04. The ewoks are now mostly CG and there are a lot more of them.

    Allow me to be the first to say... grrreaaaaat....

  115. Re:These stories will come after the "New Jedi Ord by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

    Caveat: The scenes with Chewie will all have to be memories, seeing as how he is dead now...

  116. Re:These stories will come after the "New Jedi Ord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "This gives a lot of credibility to the whole concept."

    Credibility ? Star Wars ?

  117. Hire Peter Jackson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The Lord of the Rings trilogy has to have been the most formidble film making project ever attempted, and Jackson succeeded. I conclude Jackson must like a challenge. And what could be a bigger challenge that saving the raped and deflated Star Wars trilogy? (Jackson's WETA's CGI graphics also beat the crap out of Lucas' ILM drivel; the CGI Yoda in Clones moved like Taz Devil)


    The last word on this mater should go to Lucas: "I don't like sand. It is coarse and irritating. Not like you. You are soft and smooth."


    No wonder Marcia left him.

  118. They'll all be rated XXX by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1, Troll

    After all, how could millions of film goers taking it up the ass not be considered pornographic?

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:They'll all be rated XXX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BAH! Moderated as a troll by some George Lucas fanatic no doubt!

    2. Re:They'll all be rated XXX by anethema · · Score: 1

      Haha that was actually pretty funny...I feel for ya man ;)

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  119. canon? by rodentia · · Score: 1

    I'll tell you why. Because this is the creative (allowances, people) work of one, yet living, man; subject to all the exigencies of time, commitment, attitude and cash flow. Canon, my ass. He's got interns doing story and dialogue, dude. He's apparently got some long-term income requirements and he's not done buffing his helmet.

    You can talk about the canon after he's dead. And then only if we decide the first one was worth all the crap he's put us through since.

    CANON: fr. Latin: according to rule; fr. Greek: kanonikos. The modern literary usage denotes work judged to form a model of quality; in technical parlance: conforming to standard, definitive. Both connote the adjudicative valuation of peers.

    Lucas cannot have a canon, whether his o'erweening ego demands it or not, though he may have conventions or principles.

    --
    illegitimii non ingravare
  120. Look at him... by KermitAndLadyHoliday · · Score: 4, Funny

    he's heading for that small movie.

    H: I think I can get him before he gets there...he's almost in range.

    (the small movie begins to take on the appearance of another trilogy)

    B: That's no movie. It's Episode III.

    H: The trailer's too good to be Episode III.

    L: I have a very bad feeling about this.

    H: Yeah, I think you're right. Full reverse! Chewie, lock in the auxiliary power. (the ship begins to shudder) Chewie, lock in the auxiliary power!

    L: Why are we still moving towards it?

    H: We're caught in the Lucas beam! It's pulling us in!

    L: But there's gotta be something you can do!

    H: There's nothing I can do about it, kid, I've already seen Episodes I and II. I'm going to have to shut down. But they're not going to get me without a fight!

  121. Mr. Lucas has lost it, sadly. by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 1

    Like most people who saw them in the theatre, I have good memories of the first three movies. I've seen them again and they've held up over the years, except some of the disco-y sets of Episode V and the muppets of Episode VI, but those are quibbles. But Episode I was a complete and utter embarrassment to everyone involved with it. The original trailer from 1999 was awesome, but the movie held up none of that promise. It was corny, it had horrific acting, it was predictable, it had obvious and major holes, it included inexcusible scenes such as slapstick comedy during the big invasion.

    I didn't bother seeing Episode II in the theatre. I watched it at home after most everyone else had already rented it. It was kinda better, and the acting wasn't as painful, but it wasn't a good movie. It was a mishmash of supposedly story advancing plot and action scenes, but the two didn't mesh together. Overall, it was boring. I've forgotten most of the movie.

    I have no plans to see Episode III, either in the theatre or at home.

  122. Vacation time by nucal · · Score: 1

    Not only that, but he demands on not having to work on Life Day.

  123. Metallica and Star Wars - a comparison (sort of) by Holdstrong · · Score: 1

    I cant even believe I am writting this..... but Star Wars to me is now like Metallica.

    I was so diehard for both of them 10-15 years ago, and well, something has changed that. You could say they both got old and sold out, you could say I grew out of them, you could even say they were just trumped by better things. I dont quite know.

    What I DO know is that my feelings for both are all but gone now. I have since completely given up on Metallica and I hate to say it, but those fond memories of concerts and thrashing around to 'Ride the Lightning' are a bit tainted because of the crapola they have put out in the past 10 years and the pompous school yard bully act they pulled with napster.

    I think back to how hardcore I was with Metallica and I shake my head and get a bit embarrased.

    Well, thats happening with Star Wars. I cant help but think that one more horrible film will effectivly put a nail in the coffin of my Star Wars memories.

    I wish it wasnt that way, I wish the present didnt affect my feelings about the past, but it does.

  124. NOOOOOOOO! That's impossible... by adrianbaugh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why would he do this? The whole point of a story is it has a beginning, a middle and an end. The original trilogy had that. Okay, so the beginning was a bit ropey: this ship appears from nowhere and starts blasting, and there's these two droids that we know little about.
    But that's how stories often work best - they throw you in at the deep end so it's exciting and you have to think and work out what's going on. Okay, the prequels fill out the early story a bit for the hardcore fans, but nobody in their right minds, new to the series, would sit through 6+ hours of dross just to understand what the secret plans R2 had were, or to have the "I am your father" surprise ruined for them.

    But while the prequels just made the series a bit worse, the sequels would be awful. Even if you think the beginning of the middle trilogy requires some fleshing out, the end is very good. It's a final, definitive end: the bad guy is dead and the galaxy is on the road towards stability. But for gods' sake, we don't need to see it get there. Star Wars became a parody of itself a long time ago, and that's a crying shame because before it was spoilt it was very, very good.

    I've wasted four hours of my life on I and II: I suppose I'll waste two more on the off-chance that Boba Fett does something cool, or that Jar-Jar meets a spectacularly bloody end, but that's it. No more. If III is of the same quality as I and II I can't believe Lucas has the nerve even to bring it out, now that LoTR has shown us what can be done with the SF/fantasy epic genre.

    --
    "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
    - JRR Tolkien.
  125. To fix Star Wars by Krieger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would require re-doing 1-3, and at least in my mind 6. The ewoks were an abomination, and represented a massive sell-out to "childrens" movies.

    He was right on with the first two, a G movie for all audiences, with enough plot and depth for older audiences, yet enough cool stuff to captivate children, as well as a reasonably straightforward plot arch (ala Joseph Campbell).

    So many mistakes were made in the making of the first two (and I'd wager third) that it's hard to even pretend it's the same series. What makes it the most comical is that with tweaks to each of those stories they could have been grand. My favorite example is Anakin slaughtering all of the Raiders after finding his mother seconds before her dying (way out in the realm of possibility). More realistic would have been to have him sneak in, rescue her, only to have her get shot and then die in his arms and have him return with his rage to wipe them out.

    I'm certain that thoughts like mine have been bouncing around Star Wars fans heads. Without copyright being what it is now, enterprising producers would be able to try and correct these wrongs inside of the fans lifetimes (at least with the founders copyright).

    At this point I think I'll see Star Wars III at the dollar theater, and if it's better then a steaming pile I'll rent it and watch it on someone's surround sound setup.

    1. Re:To fix Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you would call the Ewoks a sellout to children's movies if you knew the whole story. I found The Ewok Adventure and, in particular, Ewoks: The Battle for Endor highly enlightening as to that culture's history and general philosophy. "Cindel and the Ewok Wicket escape and in a forrest they meet Teek a naughty and very fast animal," indeed. Wilford Brimley (he of Quaker Oats fame) is truly breathtaking.

    2. Re:To fix Star Wars by Alien54 · · Score: 1
      Well, in my mind they should have made Anakin twins..... Then all kinds of plot madness and speculation could have gone on ...

      Would it be the twin who turns to the dark side to avenge his brother mother or whatever? All kinds of subtlety there ....

      And you could also show one who was chosen in the capitol vs the one who is left back on the farm ....

      and there is the telepathic nature of twins, etc. .... and the one who is left behind can get jealous, etc.....

      but this goes back to the fundamental flaws in the writing now, doesn't it?

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  126. Mod Parent Up by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1
    I was just about to say the same thing.

    Gawd I'd hate to be a movie-maker with an audience as impossible to please as some people here! Okay, ep 1 was a bit lame thanks to JarJar and ep 2 had some cringeworthy dialogue (like the scene in front of the fire when Anakin pours his heart out to whatsername) but for crying out loud were the originals any better? I mean, look at the script of ep 5! "Lap it up fuzzball" "Laserbrain!" "Nerf-herder!" "Who's scruffy?"

    Compare the battle-scene on Hoth with the battle scene on Geonosis. You're not telling me that the attack of three AT-ATs was better to watch than the carnage and wrecking that we saw in ep 2!

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:Mod Parent Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > "Lap it up fuzzball" "Laserbrain!" "Nerf-herder!" "Who's scruffy?"

      This was exactly what made the original three so much fun. They didn't take themselves too seriously. Ep I's idea of comic relief was "Meesa jar-jar binks! Meesa trip over a rock and get shocked by the pod racer! Oopsy!" and Ep II was so stone-faced it played out like a soap opera. The only thing that makes Star Wars work is the attitude of Han Solo. Bring back a Han-like character in Ep III and it may not be so bad.

    2. Re:Mod Parent Up by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      Just makes you wonder if Orson Welles was allowed to keep making movies (hollywood blacklisted him), would people yell at him the rest of his life for not measuring up to 'Citizen Cane'.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    3. Re:Mod Parent Up by cranos · · Score: 1

      Okay just a couple of things.

      Firstly while the dialogue may not gotten much better the actors were certainly better in the originals than the new series.

      Secondly, hell yes the AT-AT attacks were a hell of a lot better. Apart from anything else, they didn't look like a cut scene from some cut price sci-fi game. ESB had a sense of authenticity that Lucas lost with this current crop of films.

  127. Star Wars TV Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Here's hoping, but I rather doubt there'll be
    > 7-9 sadly. After all, it has been denied for
    > so long, and Star Wars seems to have become
    > "The life and death of Anakin Skywalker" so
    > Ep 6 concludes it I suppose. Who knows?

    A Reality TV Show two hours and fifteen minutes of Lucas meeting Habsro executives to work out which toys will be in the next movie. They should have seen the Jar Jar one, and the scene with the angry Burger King franchisee with ten thousand unsold Yoda cups is priceless!

  128. Will he need a Zimmer frame ? by MarkTina · · Score: 1

    Hmm, the guy is now 60 years old ... is he going to be up to running around blowing up Star Destroyers and carrying dismembered driods on his back ? Chewie just won't be the same going "WUUUAAAAGGG *gasp* GGHHHHHHH!!!" ;-)

  129. Other movies get the same treatment by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Casablanca: Bogart decides to stay but never gets a job. Bacall kicks his lazy ass off the couch and into the street.

    Citizen Kane: Kane finally realizes that he needs therapy and later goes to a yoga retreat in Tahiti.

    Catch-22: Most of the airbase crew are arrested and shot for insubordination. Yosarian surrenders the entire base to some Italian villagers.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Other movies get the same treatment by PateraSilk · · Score: 4, Funny
      Casablanca: Bogart decides to stay but never gets a job. Bacall kicks his lazy ass off the couch and into the street.

      Ingrid Bergman wonders what Bacall is doing in this movie and calls her agent.

      --
      Danke tres mucho, tovarishch.
    2. Re:Other movies get the same treatment by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      Parent author smacks self in head; bookmarks imdb.com

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    3. Re:Other movies get the same treatment by mechugena · · Score: 1
      Catch-22: Most of the airbase crew are arrested and shot for insubordination. Yosarian surrenders the entire base to some Italian villagers

      After they're all shot, they posthumously get medals of honor for bravery.

      Yossarian goes to live with the Italian villagers and winds up living on the base. He even becomes the mayor and offers the base to the Americans.

    4. Re:Other movies get the same treatment by baerm · · Score: 1

      I almost hate myself for adding this, but.. can't.. stop... the... typing...

      and next day's headline?

      Receptionist at talent agency institutionalized after receiving call from actress dead twenty years.

  130. No mention of James Earl Jones! by dloflin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No mention of whether James Earl Jones does the voice of Vader in any of the new/touched-up scenes. I get that it's Hayden in the un-masked scene...just as it wasn't James Earl Jones. But what about other scenes?

    And...does James Earl Jones do the (masked) voice of Darth Vader in Ep III? Or will we not see Vader (as we see him in Ep IV) in Ep III? Perhaps just a mangled Anakin, or an early version of the Darth Vader mask.

    Hmm..I remember reading long ago, either in a fan magazine or something (maybe the book version of Star Wars?) that Anakin became disfigured, requiring the mask & prostheses, when Obi Wan threw him into a volcano. I hope Lucas remembered that (if it was in the book or in any way "official").

    My main gripe about Ep I-II was the lack of continuity with Ep IV-VI -- like Lucas had forgotten the "vision" he'd come up with originally (supposedly he'd sketched out ALL NINE episodes before filming Star Wars). I guess he's fixing it now by modifying Ep IV, V, and VI. Sigh. Better than nothing I suppose...

  131. How about Peter Jackson does VII-IX? by MattW · · Score: 5, Funny

    Call me crazy, but Jackson handled LOTR with about the most love and care and achievement I could ever expect from making it into a Hollywood trilogy.

    So, if Lucas doesn't want to do VII-IX himself, that's fine, but how about he let Jackson take over? You end up with a vastly superior sequel trilogy, and we'd probably get the movies 1 year apart instead of 3.

    1. Re:How about Peter Jackson does VII-IX? by nagora · · Score: 0
      Call me crazy, but Jackson handled LOTR with about the most love and care and achievement I could ever expect from making it into a Hollywood trilogy.

      Okay: you're crazy. Jackson's LotR was half-arsed hack work. Look at the pictures, ignore the characters.

      Not that that makes Jar-Jar any better.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    2. Re:How about Peter Jackson does VII-IX? by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1
      Jackson's LotR was half-arsed hack work.

      It really must bother you that there is a creative, respected successful, fat ugly dude in the world and it is not you.


      I don't like fantasy literature, and I only saw the first of the LOTR movies. It was great. No need to see it again, but it left an impression of craftsman ship and caring about a bunch of books he really loved. Get over it.

      --
      Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    3. Re:How about Peter Jackson does VII-IX? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, do they teach you that shit at some kind of cynical-loser school, or do you just mail away for a kit?

      LotR was great, and there's no way it sacraficed characters for pretty pictures -- as the Matrix did, and as SW Ep I & II did.

      Don't quit your day job expecting to become a critic.

    4. Re:How about Peter Jackson does VII-IX? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does Peter Jackson and LOTR have to do with Hollywood?

    5. Re:How about Peter Jackson does VII-IX? by Admiral1973 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's an interesting idea, but I doubt it would happen. Peter Jackson will spend the rest of his life answering questions about LOTR and having the rest of his work compared to it. His filmmaking legacy is secure. I don't see why he'd want to take on another juggernaut like Star Wars and deal with the fans and the media and the hype again.

      If there are any more SW films, Lucas will make them himself. By insisting on directing the prequel trilogy films despite critical and fan reactions, he's shown that he needs to keep that control. He's not going to give it up, especially to someone like Peter Jackson, who would impose his own vision on the project. And by his ability to get actual emotive performances out of his actors, Jackson would show the audience that he's clearly the better director. It's not bad for Lucas to be outdone in a separate film genre, but he won't let it happen in his own universe.

      --
      Lousy minor setbacks! This world sucks! -- Homer Simpson
    6. Re:How about Peter Jackson does VII-IX? by nagora · · Score: 1
      I only saw the first of the LOTR movies. It was great. No need to see it again, but it left an impression of craftsman ship and caring about a bunch of books he really loved.

      You must have slept through it then; the first film was rancid garbage by someone that clearly hadn't read the book beyond skimming it for the fight scenes.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    7. Re:How about Peter Jackson does VII-IX? by nagora · · Score: 1
      LotR was great, and there's no way it sacraficed characters for pretty pictures

      Yeah, right. Tell that to Frodo.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    8. Re:How about Peter Jackson does VII-IX? by Angst+Badger · · Score: 1

      Call me crazy, but Jackson handled LOTR with about the most love and care and achievement I could ever expect from making it into a Hollywood trilogy.

      With all due respect to Peter Jackson, whose handling of LOTR has indeed been spectacular, who's going to write the damn things? Some of the credit for LOTR, after all, should go to, um, J.R.R. Tolkien. Having the skill to make great movies from great books is one thing; it is quite another to write a great book in the first place.

      And with the exception of a few surviving oldbies, the current slate of science fiction writers don't inspire a great deal of confidence in me.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  132. Oh Yeah ! by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

    I agree completely, most people I know saw the first film when they were 7 or 8, they went to the cinema for their Birthday or they were allowed to stay up late and watch it on TV and they liked it.

    I think the whole Star Wars thing is mainly a nostalgic thing, the first 3 films weren't really anything exceptionally special - Indiana Jones is much better but it reminded people of their childhood and liking Star Wars and collecting the figures and playing Star Wars games in the playground became a habit, a habit which has unfortunatley persisted into adulthood in a lot of unfortunate victims.

    It's no wonder the last couple of films have been derided by nearly everyone except the most fanatic die hard fans because everyone was expecting to have a cinema experience similar to that first time all those years ago - when they were 7 or 8 forgetting that they are now in their mid to late 20's and not children anymore.

    The new films were rubbish which didn't help, what I can't understand is how come anyone is interested in what George Lucas is doing when it's perfectly obvious all he's doing is generating vast amounts of cash for himself.

    That was a rant and I apologise, I don't even know why I am reading this story.

    1. Re:Oh Yeah ! by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      Agreed, the story in the original Star Wars isn't that great. I think it was just everything else in the movie that was just so mind blowing. Lucas created a complete world and brought it to the screen.

      I think people see things when they are young and attach strongly to them. When you watch them again as an adult, you kinda get a different perspective.

      All that being said, I think the stories are grander and futher reaching in the first two movies. Though I too thought that Jar-Jar was a Dufus and little Anakin was a shitty actor.

      The first three movies aren't just about Anakin. They are about a Republic handing their freedoms over to a tyrant who waves insecurity in front of their eyes. I think it's a lesson that everyone should take to heart givin certain modern political realities.

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  133. Edit in Ep IV... by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 3, Funny

    [Princess Leia torture scene in Death Star]
    The floating torture droid has been removed and replaced with a TV and DVD carousel player...
    [Vader places Ep's 1-3 and 7-9 in carousel]
    Vader: [finger poised over Play button] So Princess, where is the Rebels' secret base?

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
  134. Well, I kind of like Star Wars... by joebok · · Score: 1

    Boy, reading through these posts I have never seen such an accumulation of bad vibes and negativity. Even articles about Micro$oft, SCO, and DRM are not such downers!

    Well, I for one have enjoyed the Star Wars movies. I'm not saying they are the best movies ever, but as pieces of entertainment they have done the job - I don't begrudge the price of a single ticket, or even the popcorn I ate while watching. If Lucas makes some more, I'll probably go see them too. Why not?

  135. Film buffs know... by T-Ranger · · Score: 1
    That Lucas was heavily influenced by The Hidden Fortress.. It is the story of to peasants/slaves. If you note, the only characters who have been in all of the Star Wars films so far are the two droids.

    It is the droids who pull the whole story together. This is a intentional, if loose goal.

    Sort of like how what could have been called "A breif history of US events from 1945-1980 as witnessed by a baffoon" ended up being called "Forest Gump"

    1. Re:Film buffs know... by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1

      It amuses me that you misspelt 'buffoon' :-)

    2. Re:Film buffs know... by moonsammy · · Score: 1

      If you note, the only characters who have been in all of the Star Wars films so far are the two droids.

      What about Anakin / Darth Vader?

    3. Re:Film buffs know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Obi-Wan Kenobi. If you count ghosts.

  136. I'm looking forward *not* seeing Chewbacca ... by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    as well as none of the sequels ...

  137. Wasn't there just an article on rewriting by FerretFrottage · · Score: 2, Funny

    It appears that code isn't the only thing subject to re-writes. Time to opensource SW and let's make 1000 different versions of it.

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  138. Only 6 episodes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are only 6 episodes!

    Star Wars is the story of Anakin Skywalker (Darth Vader). Darth Vader dies in Episode VII therefore there can only be 6 episodes.

  139. Probable successor by haplo21112 · · Score: 1

    I suspect that if there is a 7,8,9 looming, that the reins of control will likely be handed over to Rick McCallum the producer of the 1,2,3 trilogy. In interviews he has always struck me as the true driving force these days behind Star Wars. I also suspect that with Lucas out of the way the movies would fair much better.

    If there is a 7,8,9 Lucas will probably lay down the most basic story outlines, perhaps take on exec-producer/creative consultant role, the meat of the writing, directing, etc will be handed off to a trusted lutenent

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
  140. Re:What SW 3 has to be for me to pay money to see by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1
    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  141. Too late. by oGMo · · Score: 1
    Now VI, VII, and VII. Star Wars - teaching Roman numerals to whole new generation.
    Too late.
    --

    Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

    1. Re:Too late. by nightsweat · · Score: 1

      Touche.

      --

      the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  142. I knew it all along... by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 1

    Okay, so this name I use here gives me away as some fanatic Star Wars fan. Well, I don't own my own set of Stormtrooper armor nor have I filmed my own FanFilm. But I do admit I love the movies and most of the books, etc...

    I have nothing to back this up other than my own memory. There is a lot of rumoring that has supported this for some time as well. Back many many years ago, in a town far far away there was a moment I distintly remember from my childhood. There was a Star Wars tour that included folks dressed up as Darth, Chewie, Jawas, and assorted other creatures from the movies. We're talking late seventies early eighties here kids. Well, GL himself was a part of this and I distinctly remember him saying that there would be a total of 9 films, one every three years, over a 21 year time frame. First the middle tilogy, then the pre-quel trilogy, and finally the sequel trilogy.

    Now, maybe this is just a childhood fantasy that I remember as truth even to this day. I was agast when GL stated he never planned on doing more than the first three--I knew all along that he was lying. So I find this report to be not surprising.

    Now, if only GL will hand over the reigns and let me direct the last three, I can put everything back into order....Dreams do continue.

  143. Some suggestions for Mr. Lucas by nomadicGeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You have been disappointing us. While many of us grew up with your movies and loved them, things have been steadily going down hill.

    1. Hire some real writers. You got help with Empire and it was the best movie to date. Don't try to do it yourself, you're real talent lies elsewhere.

    2. Hire another director. Get somebody like Peter Jackson who can film the trilogy all at once. We don't like waiting years between movies. 1 year max between releases.

    3. If it's cute. Leave it out. No more muppet'y characters like the Ewoks. No more frickin' Jar Jar type characters. I just can't take it. If you would like, I will offer my services for free. You can run this stuff by me and I will tell you if it sucks.

    4. Give it an edge like Empire. Your loyal fan base is getting older. We want a real plot without all of the inconsistencies that you have written yourself into in the last two movies. Remember, we're adults now. We we love the world and the characters that you created for us but we really want to experience it on an adult level. I'll say it again. No more Jar Jar's.

    5. Concentrate on what you really do best. Keep pushing the state of the art in film production. Push ILM to make the movie better while producing it faster and cheaper than anyone has ever done. Bring the costs of producing epic style movies down to a more reasonable level so that even more young artists can expose us to their visions without having a $100 million bank roll. The less expensive it gets, the more variety we will have.

    6. Don't concentrate on making a blockbuster. Just make the best movie that you can and show it to us. We will pay to see it. You don't have to have product tie ins everywhere we go. No more cheesy market deals. No more Jar Jar's (did I already mention that?)

    7. I want the new trilogy to hit DVD before I start collecting social security. Besides if you get off your ass on this, you can sell the previous movie on DVD right before you release the next movie. Easy advertising. (Don't do like LOTR though and release a 'normal' DVD and hold out the good one for a month or two. We like that about as much as we adore Jar Jar).

    7. Use your influence and $$$ to get us completely digital theaters. We all want to see the new movies on a crystal clear screen that isn't going to be completely degraded the 3rd and 4th time we go to see it. (This assumes that you make them good).

    You know what. Forget it all. I'm still pissed about the whole Jar Jar thing.

    1. Re:Some suggestions for Mr. Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The goal for the next three should be to have them written so well they'd work on an empty theatrical stage, with actors in street clothes and no effects.

      Then add the goodies.

    2. Re:Some suggestions for Mr. Lucas by Schnapple · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Don't do like LOTR though and release a 'normal' DVD and hold out the good one for a month or two. We like that about as much as we adore Jar Jar
      Hold on there - we're all complaining that Lucas won't put out the original Star Wars movies on DVD, just the special editions. However, Peter Jackson puts out the original and extended editions of the LOTR movies and we shit on him? Plus, we're told in advance about the extended editions, they're not sprung on us years later.
      Use your influence and $$$ to get us completely digital theaters.
      Buy a $100K projector for each of the 3,000+ screens he wants to show it on? That alone would cost $300 million at least.
    3. Re:Some suggestions for Mr. Lucas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I was pissed about Jar Jar, I think the WORST thing about star wars are the f*cking ewoks.

  144. Idea: Make Whedon's Firefly instead! by macMaestro · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ha! We'll never get original Star Wars DVDs. If we're lucky we might get that modified 20th aniversary crap (I'm not a fan of modified films), but it's debatable to call that lucky.

    No more madness! Stop these horrid movies! Hope Fox'll make Firefly instead.

    FIREFLY RULES!!!

  145. Has history taught us nothing... by glitch · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...about the devastating results of too many alterations?

    1. Re:Has history taught us nothing... by LafinJack · · Score: 1

      I liked this one better...

      --
      we are building a religion
      a limited edition
      we are now accepting callers
      for these pendant key chains
  146. Unauthorized use of a motor vehicle? by KlomDark · · Score: 1

    Is it possible that the Jonathan Darrell Mayhew in Granbury is Chewbacca's son? If so, he stole a couple cars... :)

    1. Re:Unauthorized use of a motor vehicle? by BrodyVess · · Score: 1

      Ok, rather than call the town gossip, I'll call my friend the bailbondsman ;) Information is cheap in a town that small.

      --
      No one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
  147. Re:Metallica and Star Wars - a comparison (sort of by {tele}machus_*1 · · Score: 1

    You're right, and it's a shame. I loved the first three movies with a passion. Despite a lot of the obvious flaws in the first three movies, I used to see all these useful little life lessons in them that I felt were overwhelmingly profound (for example, getting angry over your problems doesn't solve them and only hurts you in the end).

    I still have those little attachments to the first three movies, but in a more nostalgic sense, like "Remember when these movies used to mean something to me?" I can't even watch them anymore, because parts that I thought were cool are now just hollow (example: who cares what Yoda says about the force in ESB--Luke: "I can't believe it!" Yoda: "That is why you fail."--when we now know that the force is merely a genetic artifact).

    I've tried hard to give Lucas the benefit of the doubt on the prequels, but, if I am totally honest with myself, I have to admit that the prequel movies stink. It would be great if I could just pretend that the prequels don't exist, but they have forever altered my preception of the original trilogy. I'll go see Episode III, and I'll be excited, but I have given up hope that it will redeem the whole series for me. I can't imagine that the hypothetical Episodes 7, 8, and 9 could ever redeem the series either.

  148. Huge "Who cares?" by smalloy · · Score: 1

    After seeing the poorly-written, poorly-acted cartoons that Lucas has been trying to pass off as Star Wars films, I could care less about Episode 3, nevermind 7, 8 or 9. He's managed to kill the franchise as far as I'm concerned.

  149. Ehmm.. by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 1

    I believe Lucas was originally planning 7,8,9, but he's too old and so there weren't going to be any. Or am I wrong?

    --

    ---
    Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
  150. George Lucas to have cameo in episode 9 by sjonke · · Score: 1

    Plans are for Lucas to make a cameo appearance in episode 9 in which it will be revealed that Jar Jar is his real father.

    --
    --- What?
  151. What Mark Hamill Thinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when ToyFare interviewed Mark Hamill about toys and various other stuff, when asked about what his opinion of the new star wars movies was, he replied:

    "It's like I was a member of the Beatles... and now it's just Wings."

  152. Mod that as..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1 B5 Reference!

  153. The Brain that Wouldn't Die by Animats · · Score: 1
    Oh, please. Can we end this thing?

    Or at least get writers who can write. The Buffy team is available.

  154. excuse me.. by atheken · · Score: 1

    There better not be a 7-8-9, i can't even beli-

    sorry eveybody, can't finish this post, vomitted all over the keyboard.

  155. Hot Dog Website by Gossy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Has anyone noticed just quite how bad the Hot Dog site is?

    The "Current issue" and "Back Issue" link to 192.168.1.100/... addresses for crying out loud!

    1. Re:Hot Dog Website by prockcore · · Score: 1

      The "Current issue" and "Back Issue" link to 192.168.1.100/... addresses for crying out loud!

      What's even more amazing is that their Current issue has the exact same files on it as my other computer!

  156. What George Lucas thinks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that he couldn't care less what losers on slashdot think of his films.

  157. Great!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fan: "Who will be the leading character? Mark Hamil is old. Vader is dead."

    George (sucking his "CG" labeled crackpipe): "JarJar! JarJar!!!"

  158. RTFA by gumpish · · Score: 1

    From the Hotdog piece that TheForce quoted:

    but his contract also stipulates that he'd be required to appear in Episodes 7, 8, and 9.

    "He'd" - I know some /. readers have a hard time expanding contractions (should've != "should of"), so I'll spell this one out for you.

    "he'd be required" = "he WOULD be required"...

    The interpretation that strikes me first is the following:

    He WOULD be required to appear in episodes 7, 8, and 9 ***IF*** they were made.

    Now then, if the language used was "he'll be required to appear" - THAT would be a different ballgame. "He WILL be required to appear..."

  159. Re:Not your father's Oldsmobile by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 2, Funny

    Year: 2038 Headline Star Wars Episode 9 Completed. Episodes I through VI redone to remove inconsistencies ( just under nuclear disaster caused by 32 bit date rollover ) 01 Anakin is now an Ewok in all episodes 02 Jabba The Hut actually molests Princess Leia 03 ... Seems Star Wars will never be finished..

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  160. New Star Wars joke... by cmeans · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why was EP VI afraid of EP VII?

    Because VII VIII IX!

  161. Why hasn't Lucas sued Quaker yet? by gearmonger · · Score: 1

    I mean, what more blatant of a rip-off is Quaker Chewy Granola Bars - http://quakerchewy.com/ No wonder Chewbacca is so bitchy all the time if this is all he has to eat. At least Scooby snacks had a touch o' the wacky weed.

  162. Episode 3=? by mapmaker · · Score: 0, Redundant
    profit!

    and that's no joke.

  163. Maybe this is what is going to happen... by fullmetal55 · · Score: 1

    Fact, Lucas has made it evident that "he" will NEVER make a sequel trilogy to the original trilogy. maybe, just maybe, he's realizing that he's not the guy the fans want making the movies... and is having somebody else make the sequel trilogy, and he will have executive producer credits and little else with no real power or creative input. Crosses fingers

  164. Plot is NOT an issue in more SW films by belgar · · Score: 3, Insightful


    As anyone who's read the Star Wars storyline as it continues past the 4/5/6, if Lucas uses these as a baseline for more movies, rejoice your ass off.

    The stories (for the most part) have great depth, a wealth of plot scenarios to choose from (which might be the biggest stumble to what to make for sequels), and continue the stories of the principals through the next 30 years (kids, getting old, death, etc.). It actually makes the characters a helluva lot more believable.

    Hats off to the editors who have made EVERY story that followed the movies tie into one another -- their consistency checks have got to be brain numbing, they're so thorough. That alone has made the stories a lot of fun to read.

    And the authors include some well-known names in modern sci-fi, including James Luceno, Michael P. Kube-McDowell, and Michael Stackpole.

    So, go read some dead tree, and see what kind of potential there is for three (or more!) sequels from Lucas. Let's just hope he uses some of the material available to him, instead of striking off on his own.

    --
    What does it mean to wake out of a dream
    and be wearing someone else's shorts?
    BNL, Born on a Pirate Ship (1998)
  165. Pirate. by DarkHelmet · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I for one plan to download a copy of Episode III off the net to boycott it sucking.

    And if it somehow ends up being good, I will then go see it in the theatre.

    This is how I use piracy to get rid of that silly geek factor that allowed Episodes 1 and 2 to make 400 million+. I will not support a movie by paying for it if it's not any good.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:Pirate. by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      NOTE: I did this for the Matrix revolutions - after re-loaded and all I heard about revolutions I'm bloody glad I did.

      It might be stealing, but it's my way of fighting back damnit - fuck paying 14$ AUD to see that rubbish.

  166. What would be better... by Soothh · · Score: 0

    is if he created movies for the new jedi order series, the books are killer, and while ep 7 8 and 9 books are great, the story for the new ones are better, but so many books would take what, 15 movies? and luke leia and han are about the right age to do them. i cant see 7 8 9 w/out the original people but the last trillogy is only 5 years after ROTJ.

    --
    We have seen that living things are too improbable and too beautifully "designed" to have come into existence by chance.
  167. Make-Episode-3-not-Suck-HOWTO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MAKE EPISODE 3 NOT SUCK HOWTO
    Anonymous Coward
    v0.01 January 16 2004
    o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
    D etails on how to make episode 3 the good
    o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
    # Lots of stuff Omitted ...
    For the impatient:
    1. Keep George Lucas away from the set.
    Possible Alternatives:
    1. Remove George Lucas as the Director
    2. Take him to Mordor

  168. EP2 book by Soothh · · Score: 0

    "I'm sorry but I'm just sick of George Lucas raping my fond childhood memories of the first 3 Star Wars movies, and my wallet. Isn't it enough that he's created 2 incredibly bad movies in a row?"

    #1 we all knew they wouldnt be AS good, its more informational than action. Leading up to the original tillogy.

    #2 Anakin cant act. thats a lucas tradition that the leading actor cant act (in the star wars series)

    #3 Yes, the movies were not as good as people wanted, but i read the book for EP2, and i think you should too, it was fantastic, and filled in all the gaps the movie left out.

    the problem with the movie for EP2 for example is, they left out things from the book they shouldnt have, and put things in that could have been left out to make room for the good stuff.

    --
    We have seen that living things are too improbable and too beautifully "designed" to have come into existence by chance.
  169. No, 4, 5, and 6 were much better by GuyMannDude · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Unless you mean the prequels made you realize how lame the series already was by episode 6. How hokey episode 4 was, and how the pinnacle of the series was directed and largely rewritten by people other than Lucas. That could understandably rob you of fond memories. Of course, just watching them again older and wiser would probably have done that.

    I hate to tell you this but I *have* watched the original trilogy since I was a kid. In fact, I probably watch the original trilogy about 3 times every year. I still enjoy them. You may argue that my positive feelings about those films are because I'm remembering my childhood or something. But I think they were substancially different than the new stuff.

    Why? The characters. The original trilogy had likeable characters who were really giving it their all to take back the galaxy. Solo was a great guy. You could feel for what Luke was going through. Leia was clearly struggling with how to give all the parts of herself equal time. The rebellion doesn't have much but, boy, do they have heart! The Jedi, on the other hand, strike me as really a bunch or arrogant elite who seem to not be doing a very good job of anything. Anakin is just a spoiled brat. Obi Wan seems to have some ability but he never gets awfully worked up about anything. Yoda and Mace just sit around looking pensive and occasionally whip out their lightsabres. I wouldn't want to sit down and have a beer with any of those guys. They're just do damn boring.

    Now let's look at the villans. Sure, in the original series the stormtroopers could never shoot straight but you knew that Vader was running the show most of the times and so it seemed like the Empire had a real chance of crushing the freedom fighters. In Ep 6 we see that Vader is starting to weaken a bit but then we're introduced to the Emperor who is even more powerful than Vader. *This* guy really knows his shit and he seems to delight in tormenting Luke. To put it simply, the bad guys were fearsome and competant. Now look at the bad guys from Ep 1 and 2. Darth Maul was cool but never really given a chance to say much. The Viceroy and the other Trade Federation weenies seem utterly incompetant. And Palpatine and Dooku have yet to do anything really horribly dispicable. It's hard to get worked up about these bad guys.

    So there you have my theory. Characters are what makes the difference between the old and the new trilogy. Basically the old one had characters you could love and hate. The new one just has a bunch of guys dancing around in a CGI videogame.

    GMD

    1. Re:No, 4, 5, and 6 were much better by stwrtpj · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The rebellion doesn't have much but, boy, do they have heart!

      Agreed.

      The Jedi, on the other hand, strike me as really a bunch or arrogant elite who seem to not be doing a very good job of anything.

      Also agree, but are you saying this made Ep I/II bad? Granted, I and II had problems, but this is not one of them. Yes, the Jedi are a bunch of stuck-up, arrogant buttheads. That's one of the main points of the movie. We're likely to see this play out more in Ep III. Much of the Jedis' downfall is by their own hand. They got too used to their power and to the status quo to see more than a few inches in front of their face. You're supposed to doubt them at this point.

      And Palpatine and Dooku have yet to do anything really horribly dispicable. It's hard to get worked up about these bad guys.

      I think that's one of the reasons why people have trouble with Ep I/II. We're essentially seeing the story out-of-sequence. We started in the middle of the story, where the battle lines were very clearly drawn, and everyone had already put on their white or black hats. In Ep I/II, this has not happened yet. The ones that become or pave the way for the great villians of the later movies have no choice but to act in secret. To me, Palpatine's machinations in the Senate echo the events of the rise of the Nazi party to power and Hitler's ascension to Chancellor (hell, even the title is the same!) in Germany circa the 1930s.

      I sometimes wonder how people might have reacted had the movies been produced and released in the actual chronological order that the events happen. It might have garnered a different reaction. Yeah, the screenplays could have been better written, but I think the overall story still plays well, and would have played better in the proper sequence.

      --
      Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
    2. Re:No, 4, 5, and 6 were much better by denks · · Score: 1

      Agreed with all of the above, but my opinion is the reason 1 and 2 sucked was the lack of muppets. Sorry, but the computer generated effects just do not do it the same. Which looks more believable? Yoda the muppet talking and walking slowly, or yoda the computer generated thing racing around the room like a posessed leprechaun? To me he looked more like he was trying to kill and eat someone.

      And the characters are not as good in 1 and 2. Take Jar Jar. CP3O was a bit stupid, but funny stupid. Jar Jar is just idiotic. And again, as he is not a muppet, in a lot of scenes he looks like a cartoon character inserted into the film. Why dont we just have Roger Rabbit and not pretend to be a serious movie?

      Come on Mr Lucas, all will be forgiven though if you can just find a painful enough way for Jar Jar to die!

      --

      I am Monkey, the Great Sage, equal of heaven!
    3. Re:No, 4, 5, and 6 were much better by metroid+composite · · Score: 1
      Jar Jar's role in Episode 2 was perfectly fine. They didn't deny his existance, or outrage his 10 year old fans by putting him through a meat grinder, but they did put him into a role with very few lines, and made him a politican to boot! (Yay, we have more excuses to throw tomatoes! We can always hope he'll be a lawyer in the next film!)

      And Yoda the posessed leprichaun is cool! Just about everyone I talked to after seeing Episode 2 loved the scene, and it will go down as one of the most memorable movie moments of all time (despite protests of the more hardcore geeks). No, the problem with Episode 2 is that Anakin got the worst acting job I've ever seen in a movie. Granted, some of that can be chalked up to his lines, though Amidala's acting job seemed passable to me, so it's clearly possible for an actor to cope with Lucas' script.

    4. Re:No, 4, 5, and 6 were much better by rpillala · · Score: 1

      Not to mention quotable lines. I defy you to find any quotable lines from episodes I or II.

      Well, except maybe:

      Yoda: How feel you?
      Anakin: Cold, sir...
      (blah blah blah)
      Yoda: I sense much food in you.

      Ravi

      --
      When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
    5. Re:No, 4, 5, and 6 were much better by denks · · Score: 1

      Come on...what 10yo wouldnt find it cool to see Jar Jar being zapped with electric bolts by the Emperor? :)

      JJ: Me Sa thinks you want me to talk?
      Emperor: No Mr Jar, I want you to die!

      --

      I am Monkey, the Great Sage, equal of heaven!
  170. Jedi Academy movies? by phorm · · Score: 1

    Actually, JA might make a better TV series than movies. How about some shorts, divided into episodes? Think something like Star-trek (before it sucked too badly)

  171. Another rumor by j0hnfr0g · · Score: 1

    I've heard that Jar Jar will not be in episode IV.

  172. Crazy Eddie by Hellburner · · Score: 1

    I can see from your phrasing that you would prefer to see Ewoks CG'ed out and replaced with Motie Watchmakers.

    I thought I was only the third person to ever use that expression.

  173. Jedi Academy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to see some "Jedi Academy" movies.

    Man, if they cast some hot mama to play a tough lady Jedi who likes to kick some ass ala Sgt. Callahan from Police Academy I'd sure pay money to see that! Hubba hubba!

  174. Fine. Whatever. by toganet · · Score: 1

    Just get somebody to maybe, I don't know, SKIm the damn script before they start shooting? Terrible dialogue is one thing, but if I have to hear another stupidly-named character or poorly-obfuscated english word I will drive to Lucas's house and scream random words from the OED until my vocal chords melt.

    Seriously, does George ask his pre-pubescent kid to come up with the names of characters? Dooku? Greedo? And don't get me started on Jar-Jar.

  175. welcome to 1980 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is very very old news. episodes 7,8,9 were rumored over a decade ago

  176. Who needs actors? by supabeast! · · Score: 1

    By the time Lucas gets around to making sequels, he won't need any actors. He can just license the rights to the appearances of Carrie Fisher, Harrison Ford, and Mark Hamill, and have ILM just do the whole damned movie with CG, eliminating all of those costly bluescreen shots. No more paying union wages for gaffers, lighting techs, etc.. Just a bunch of nerds with a rendering farm and voice-synthesizers.

  177. Warriors, actually. by RatBastard · · Score: 1

    Motie warriors, actually. I can beleive that they could take out the storm troopers with nothing more than rocks and logs. Hell, they could whipe the stormtroopers out with no weapons and their extra claw tied behind their backs.

    Damn, but I'd like to see a "Mote in God's Eye" movie.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  178. CYA by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 1

    The additional "episodes" in the contract are probably just legal ass-covering, on a just-in-case basis, so as to avoid the actors holding them for ransom. Any "postsequels" have to star Chewie, so it makes sense to preemptive-negotiate with his actor, before the viewing figures come in.

    1. Re:CYA by willtsmith · · Score: 1

      Of all actors, I think that "Chewie" would be the most replaceable. After all, he's in a shag rug costume the whole time.

      There are plenty of NBA forwards out there who cuold fill the suit ;-)

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
  179. Re:06.04 by mechugena · · Score: 1

    Hey...as long as more of them DIE, I'll be extremely happy. The only good Ewok is a DEAD Ewok!

  180. Fix Episode I by SQLz · · Score: 1

    Why are they doing Episode III, they should go back and fix the debacle we all know as Episode I.

  181. generational malaise by Cygnus17 · · Score: 1

    Everytime I watch 4, 5, or 6 (and very rarely, 1 and 2) I see something new that: doesn't follow continuity; doesn't make sense; is just plain stupid/annoying/plottish/etc., etc. Little by little, though, I'm coming to terms with the fact that Star Wars is dead as far as our generation(s) is/are concerned.

    It was definitely our big "cinema experience". Just like you could say the baby boomers' "media experience" was JFK's assassination, or the landing of the Eagle on the moon. Every iteration of the genepool has its own big deal, something that 99% of people can point at and say nifty things like "ayuh, I remember where I was when... blah blah blah" and have someone their age nod and go "yep". The original three SW films were definitely our own. We were first to see anything like that, the first to go nuts about the toys, the comics, the this and that.

    If you're a kid of the 80s, you were also the first to play with Go-Bots, Transformers, Speak n Spell, Atari 2600/5200/etc., and so on; ever taken a stroll around a toy store lately? The same toys are still around, only now they're updated, revamped, retooled for the next slew of kids who will play with them, love them and stash them in boxes when they grow out of them.

    Movie franchises (and I mean the "summer blockbuster" types) cater towards kids. I would be very surprised if a huge % of the ticket profits from Episodes I & II wasn't from parents' wallets.

    Another thought is that the original three episodes were so much better because they were the beginning of the George Lucas Empire. They weren't a phenomenon or a franchise yet; they were a pricey, labor-of-love gamble on Lucas' part. He had to make movies that would be appealing to the whole gamut, and for the most part, he did, obviously.

    So if he goes and makes another three... well, they'll be geared towards a whole new generation of kids to whom the original trilogy would seem like someone blubbering to us about the "good old days" when movies were silent, none of that "talky" shit. Maybe that's an exaggeration, but it's close enough.

    I think the only thing I still begrudge Lucas for is him telling Leonard Maltin in the 3-part interview included with the pre-Special (Olympic) Edition three-pack VHS of Episodes 4, 5, and 6: "I'd like to direct again, sure. But I'll probably only direct Episode I, blah blah blah Jar-Jar ha ha you stupid bastards."

    Oh, that's paraphrased, of course. Yeah.

  182. That doesn't mean 7,8, & 9 are going to be mad by jpski · · Score: 1
    "Mayhew's contract contains a stipulation that he must also appear in Episodes 7, 8, and 9"


    When Lucas agreed to Mayhew's contract, he probably knew that 7, 8, & 9 would never be made. The contract won't be broken until the sequels are made without Mayhew -- if they are never made, the contract is never broken.
  183. Tentative Titles... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... "Plans 7, 8 & 9 From Outer Space," respectively.

  184. I could have sworn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that I read in '97 or '98 that Lucas sold the rights to make the "post-quel" movies...

  185. Hotdog's editor speaks! Er, types by payndz · · Score: 1
    As the editor of Hotdog (it's one word, not two), I apologise profusely for the miserable quality of the website. I hate it, everybody on the magazine hates it, but we currently have no time or resources available to improve it.

    We're all still extremely proud of the magazine itself, though. If every /. reader went out and bought a copy, maybe we'd be able to do something about the website. (Hell, maybe the site being slashdotted might shake some cash loose!) I'm just sayin', is all...

    --
    You must think in Russian.
  186. A long time ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Ep. 4 was released WAY back in, oh, 1977, was it?, it was reported that Lucas had planned a series of 9 movies, a trilogy of trilogies. "A New Hope" was known at that time to be the fourth movie; i.e., the first of the central trilogy.

    So the existence of plans for 7, 8, and 9 have been known for a LONG time. The actuality of those plans (i.e., will the movies ever get made) has from time to time been in doubt. 15 years ago it seemed unlikely that Eps. 1-3 would ever get made.

  187. Same names as the Star Trek Movies... by brodin · · Score: 1

    You know it had to be said....

  188. Have'nt there been 7 Star Wars Movies Made already by Anthony · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure how many times George can pull of movies like this classic

    --
    Slashdot: Where nerds gather to pool their ignorance
  189. Digital Cinema Sucks by meehawl · · Score: 1

    Use your influence and $$$ to get us completely digital theaters. We all want to see the new movies on a crystal clear screen that isn't going to be completely degraded the 3rd and 4th time we go to see it.

    Having seen both of Lucas's digital ST movies on the big screen, I have to say the quality sucks compared with 35mm, and definitely compared with 70mm. The resolution is crappy, the colours are washed out. It's like looking at a screen saver blown up. You can see staircasing on thin diagonal details, for God's sake.

    Maybe the resolution of digital will improve inthe future, but for now the hype seems to me to be mainly one of reducing the front-end costs for distributors by lowering media reproduction costs.

    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:Digital Cinema Sucks by waaka! · · Score: 1

      I watched AOTC with digital projection too, so I know what phenomenon you're talking about. But since Ep3 is going to be digital anyway, consider the alternative to having digital theaters...staircasing on thin diagonal details, and the grain, jitter/weave, and other defects that go along with a film transfer, or even multiple generations of film transfer.

      On the other hand, if there's one upside to digital cinema, it has to be that it makes for fantastic DVD transfers. I mean, you would have to be lazy or negligent to screw up a totally clean digital source. AOTC has to be the best non-CG/animation movie transfer that I've ever seen.

  190. Sometime, in the beginning.... by UrGeek · · Score: 1

    ...i recall that Lukas had sketched out 12 movies in four trilogies. But then there are far more novels than that now.

    I suspect that after the first movie fails to make a profit, we will see a Star Wars TV series.

  191. wht about the story/script by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lucas said in the 70s/80s that he wanted to make something without so much exposition, just show things happening.

    then in ROTJ he messes things around. leia wasnt supposed to be lukes sister. but he decided to make it so and the first 'exposition' extended scene is on endor, its boring too.

    then in 1 he has mitdichlorians,
    2 he has endless discussions about love and
    duty.

  192. SPOILERS (Maybe) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I'm posting AC to make sure this is Moded as 0 by default.

    The rumor mill indicates that Vader will be tossed in a lava flow, just as you suspect. Some bits and pieces about puppet/makeup tests (i.e. mock-ups for Lucas to pick from) of crispy Anakin have made their way through the grapevine.

    Further rumor has it that James Earl Jones will be doing the Vader voice again, will have about 5 minutes of Vader dialog, and that this will be a fully masked Vader exactly as we see him 16-20 years (whatever the Ep3 to Ep4 gap is supposed to be) later (or earlier if you are counting real world years and not years on a movie timeline). I hear there will be a buttload of Force-Choke going on, too, like everyone nearby when Vader is "born" is toast.

    1. Re:SPOILERS (Maybe) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >I'm posting AC to make sure this is Moded as 0 by default.
      Your clever scheme worked!!

      Anyway, the old alleged script with the lava bath was declared fake by LucasArt a long time ago. Would they use a plot part so much circulated? It would lose much of the surprise if they did.

  193. solo was an asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    listen to his lines. if someone talked like that in real life . . . .

  194. Re:These stories will come after the "New Jedi Ord by mike_lynn · · Score: 1


    Obviously you haven't read NJO, if you're talking about Chewbacca appearing in something post-NJO.
    </SPOILER>

  195. The Books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, if you read the novelizations of Episodes I and II, they are extremely well done. Much better than the movies, in my opinion. You can imagine the story being played out in your head, perfectly acted. I'll read the novelization of Episode III as per the tradition, but I might not see the movie for a while... When I read Terry Brooks' adaptation of Epsiode II, I was floored. It was a really good book, but I was afraid it would ruin the movie. Turns out, it was the other way around...

  196. My dog by koolB · · Score: 0

    Will fill in if the contract fails...

    --
    --- Every day I am forced to add another to the list of people who can kiss my ass...
  197. Endorian Holocaust by Walabio · · Score: 1

    The Endorian Holocaust is the devastation of the destruction of the second Death Star. At the end of Star Wars: Episode VI Return of the Jedi, the rebels destroyed the second Death Star in orbit around the Forest-Moon of Endor. The Endorian Holocaust may have lead to the extinction of Ewoks on the Forest-Moon of Endor.

    The Endorian Holocaust

  198. 12 movies by Sabalon · · Score: 1

    When I was a kid I had this activity book that my parents go me. I don't remember if it was all science-fiction or all star wars, but they had a star wars crossword. One of the clues was "total number of movies to be made" and the answer was twelve.

    Seem to remember hearing that somewhere else back then too.

  199. Pulp Sci-Fi? by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to bother with any more Star Warts unless Tarantino directs them.

  200. "I thought had already seen Episode III" by UpnAtom · · Score: 1

    Me too, strange that.

    Actually, this way, Ep III might actually exceed your expectations and be considered a return to form. The story material is way better than Eps 1 & 2. There's gotta be a sex scene too...

    Come on, you should be immune to disappointment by now :)

    1. Re:"I thought had already seen Episode III" by Kulaid982 · · Score: 0

      There's gotta be a sex scene too...

      I feel compelled to say something about Natalie Portman.... and... and... hot grits....

      --

      Isn't it interesting how you come to recognize posters based solely on their sigs???
  201. Please, Just stop! by armaghetto · · Score: 1

    Please, you're raping my childhood.

  202. oh, god, no by Zyrmfxl · · Score: 1

    Unless Peter Jackson directs all three, I'd rather have my eyes bored out by cockroaches. Wonder who Lucas has in mind to play the pathetic, sulky teen who grows up to be the next scourge of the universe.

    --
    "Oh, well I'm sorry if you don't appreciate my random murders!" - Crow T. Robot,
  203. MOD PARENT UP!!! by Genjurosan · · Score: 1

    If I had points.. they would all belong on to your post.

  204. NY Times printed a summary of all 9 episodes by jaltman · · Score: 1

    I remember when I was a kid. The NY Times sometime after the original release of Episode IV as "Star Wars" printed in the Sunday Arts and Leisure section a summary of all nine episodes. I have never been able to find it since. Does anyone else remember this or have a copy?

  205. Star Wars Alternative by drakyri · · Score: 1

    ...if you're sick of watching George Lucas' bad movies that are just trying to make money off of the original trilogy's success, you may instead want to watch....: "In 1979, an Italian film company tried to capitalize off of the success of Star Wars, using David Hasslehoff. The movie was filmed in English, dubbed into Italian, and then dubbed over again into English, then released. This is that movie. Star Crash." Star Crash is so blatantly a ripoff and also so blatantly bad that, well ... it's hilarious. Also, there's a ~eight minute short clip entitled 'George Lucas in Love' which is amusing and worth the download time - check your favorite fileshare. "Imperial Battleship! Halt the flow of time!" --The Emperor of the Galaxy (Christopher Plummer) ctynomore

  206. Mark Hamill Trivia by mraymer · · Score: 1

    Trivia: He also did the voice for Muska in the Dinsey dub of Castle in the Sky (an anime movie).

    --

    "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

  207. I've got a great idea for an ending by character+sequence · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We could end the film where somebody - get this - in a small spaceship flies up to the big enemy ship and - this idea is so good - blows it up from the inside using minimal fire power. Oh wait, we already did that three fucking times!

    --
    Karma: Nonnegative
    1. Re:I've got a great idea for an ending by fuzzybunny · · Score: 2, Funny


      Ok, and here's some content to flesh it out:

      -An evil supervillain too arrogant to hire a 6 year old to spot obvious flaws in his plan
      -Obnoxiously saccharine aliens
      -An equally obnoxious kid
      -Bad guys who aim like drunkards
      -Good guys who can't get their shit together enough to make sure the bad guys don't keep coming back

      Stir vigorously, bake at 320 degrees and voila.

      Or, as the man said in the song, "...but there's this contract I had to sign, that I'll be making these movies till the end of time..."

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
  208. Re:These stories will come after the "New Jedi Ord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You obviously didn't read the caveat

  209. Oh, Dear God... by TheTick · · Score: 1

    No. Just...no.

    --

    --
    bachiatari na torisetsu o yome!

  210. Psst! by Sinical · · Score: 1
  211. Re:Man - probably lost in the post.... by rixster · · Score: 1

    But I've been round Boba Fett's house (which is in Tooting Bec - London ) and he's a nice chap. I went to uni with his son and never once did he try to throw me down that pit of zarlack of whatever its called. In fact, did you know that Boba Fett is actually Cliff Richard's ginger mate in Summer Holiday ? Well check it out in imdb if you didnt.

    --
    Two wrongs may not make a right, but three ....