Slashdot Mirror


Jens Of Sweden MP3 Player With OLED, Ogg

rune-bare-rune writes "Gadget manufacturer Jens of Sweden launches a nice-looking MP3 player with an unusual OLED display that doubles as a mirror. Supports MP3, WMA and OGG Vorbis. And as a few other really small players it handles the USB connection nicely."

349 comments

  1. Now we just need... by JessLeah · · Score: 5, Funny

    the Tom of Finland MP3 player...

    1. Re:Now we just need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already been done, it's called the iPod.

    2. Re:Now we just need... by Bilestoad · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nice display!

      Mynd you, only 512M in a MP3 playr Kan be pretti nasti...

    3. Re:Now we just need... by bigbadunix · · Score: 0, Offtopic


      Me.

      Oh. Wait. You said 'of note'.

      But, really, there are probably a lot more of us out there than most folks realize.

      --

      The older I get, the less I like everyone else.
    4. Re:Now we just need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alan Turing?

    5. Re:Now we just need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It supports OGG. Yay. *snore*

    6. Re:Now we just need... by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 1

      I know two people that are going to get metamoderated into submission...

      --
      True story.
    7. Re:Now we just need... by RainbearNJ · · Score: 1

      And--when it comes out.. you can be guaranteed it'll have a large... disk. :)

      --
      Lucky for me I always have Emergency Pants!
    8. Re:Now we just need... by mesach · · Score: 0

      I thought that it was Tom's Of Maine

      But they sell toothpaste... HMMMM maybe giving one away with a tube of toothpaste or something.

      Hell knows that everything these days is given out too easily, at my last job they gave out V.P. titles with Boxes of Tide it seemed

      --
      moo.
    9. Re:Now we just need... by euxneks · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean Torvalds of Finland? Isn't this Slashdot?

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    10. Re:Now we just need... by tindur · · Score: 5, Funny

      Link here

    11. Re:Now we just need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of us

      uh-oh...

    12. Re:Now we just need... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      At least there's the Linus of Finland OS. :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    13. Re:Now we just need... by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      A moose once bit my sister...

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    14. Re:Now we just need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, that was the joke.

    15. Re:Now we just need... by Nermal6693 · · Score: 1

      Moose trained to mix concrete and sign complicated insurance forms by Jurgen Wigg.

  2. Button Size by jm92956n · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Jens of Sweden normally has excellent product design, so it's somewhat unfortunate that the button size appears to be as small as possible. The 4-way rocker doesn't look like it'll be fun to manipulate.

    --
    An effective signature identifies a particular user amongst a base of thousands.
    1. Re:Button Size by User+956 · · Score: 5, Funny

      it's somewhat unfortunate that the button size appears to be as small as possible. The 4-way rocker doesn't look like it'll be fun to manipulate.

      Yes, much unlike the rocker that apparently *is* fun to manipulate.

      --
      The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    2. Re:Button Size by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an mp3 player that's like the Jens player. I don't think the 4 way joy stick thing is that hard to manipulate.

      lol, 4 way joy stick. that's funny.

  3. Hmm. by modifried · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ah, great. A mirror. Just what I was looking for in an MP3 player.

    1. Re:Hmm. by linzeal · · Score: 2, Funny
      I'm sure there is a way to market it for coke heads somewhere in there, just get a little chrome straw to come with it.

    2. Re:Hmm. by Audiostar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just when I was getting used to being the only person without the neccesary camera on my cell phone, now I don't have a mirror on my mp3 player. If they come out with a portable DVD player with a hair dryer, or a laptop with a built in Remington shaver I am going to have to get a third job.

    3. Re:Hmm. by Bigman · · Score: 1

      The mirror will be handy when some Haxx0r slashdots your MP3 player!!

      --
      *--BigMan--- Time flies like an arrow.. but personally I prefer a nice glass of wine!
    4. Re:Hmm. by Ambush_Bug · · Score: 1

      funny.... all my lcds seem to turn into mirrors in
      bright sunlight.

    5. Re:Hmm. by 74nova · · Score: 1
      a laptop with a built in Remington shaver
      dont be silly, thats just a ridiculous idea. now, if they could get a shaver in my phone, that would be worth it!
      --
      use your turn signal! you people act like it's divulging information to the enemy
    6. Re:Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Ah, great. A mirror. Just what I was looking for in an MP3 player.


      You're being sarcastic...which means that you've forgotten that such a feature might appeal to 50% of the world's potential MP3 player market. Yes, the same market that the pink iPod mini appeals to. Yes, the same market that is outside the experience of the stereotypical Slashdot poster. Yes, we're talking about women.
    7. Re:Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They both have uses. You can shave yo8ur nuts as you brwse the web or have your face as you talk on the phone,

  4. "doubles as a mirror." by physicsphairy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Good thing, 'cause I think they're gonna need one. ;)

  5. Looks like... by ejdmoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It looks like a rebranded iRiver to me...

    1. Re:Looks like... by LotusMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, it's more like a rebranded i-Bead
      I've the 256 Mo version since april 2003. It's a good player with a long battery life and you don't need special driver to use it. Just plug it and it's reconized as a removable drive on any OS that support USB.

      --
      -- Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur
    2. Re:Looks like... by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      It looks like a rebranded iRiver to me...

      Exactly what I thought too... Exactly the same weight, size, button positioning, and even the same `navi' string in exactly the same place.

      Although I'd hate to have a "Rechargeable battery: 520mAh Li-ion" when I have a 512MB-iRiver with a single rechargeble AA battery that runs for 30 hours*.

      (*sunpak 2200mAh AA batteries)

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    3. Re:Looks like... by Max_Abernethy · · Score: 0

      I've got a (now defunct) iRiver, and though they do look very similar, my least favorite part of it was that I had difficulty reading the LED display - this one's OLED looks much nicer.

    4. Re:Looks like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've the 256 Mo version

      What's that? 256 moles of Molybdenum or something?

    5. Re:Looks like... by evil_tamarind · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sorry but the JoS MP-130 is actually a rebranded IOPS MPF-350 (from the MPF-300 series)

    6. Re:Looks like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      French for MB ("Mega-octet").

    7. Re:Looks like... by vrmlguy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can't be an IOPS MPF-350; the web site doesn't have any pictures of women with two manly left hands.

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    8. Re:Looks like... by radoni · · Score: 1

      if you're so inclined, you can buy one for about $300usd

      it sure is sexy even without the Jesus of Sweeden with Lipstick

      --
      SIGERR: laziness exceeds quota
  6. USB 1.1? by jonman_d · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They're still making devices with USB 1.1? Especially for something like an MP3 player, where you're moving large amounts of data, USB 2 is a must. For low-end devices with only 512M of storage, you're going to be doing a lot of adding/removing of files, which makes having to constantly wait during every session a hastle; for the larger devices, it's insane to have to wait forever for your collection to transfer over the outdated 1.1 spec.

    In a world where modern machines come with USB 2, and it's also backwards compatible with USB 1, there's no excuse to make an mp3 player that only supports USB 1.1.

    1. Re:USB 1.1? by mcrbids · · Score: 5, Funny

      there's no excuse to make an mp3 player that only supports USB 1.1.

      At least they are being honest. I mean, they could have called it "USB 2.0 High Speed"!

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    2. Re:USB 1.1? by phoenix.bam! · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, they could have called it USB 2.0 FULL SPEED. Not high speed. High speed IS 480mbps, full speed is 12mbps or something

    3. Re:USB 1.1? by mcrbids · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thank you! You've just made my friggin point...

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    4. Re:USB 1.1? by jonman_d · · Score: 1

      I don't think they could even do that; this device is rated for 6mbps

    5. Re:USB 1.1? by Tweaker_Phreaker · · Score: 3, Informative

      There's hardly any reason for them to use USB 2.0 because most compact flash cards can't transfer above USB 1.1 speeds. A 12x compact flash card transfers at 14.4 mbps which is just barely over USB 1.1's limit.

    6. Re:USB 1.1? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Well I assume it's because some bean counter in accounting saw that a pack of USB 1.1 ports was 10 cents cheaper than USB 2.0.

    7. Re:USB 1.1? by pantherace · · Score: 1
      (512MB(*8B to b))/(12mb/sec )=341.33 (comment on HTML: needs a bloody fraction tag!)

      6 minutes, to fully fill it. Do people transfer half a gig of music every time they plug it in? If so, get a hard drive based player. Otherwise: maybe it's annoying the first time, but come on people!

    8. Re:USB 1.1? by RedWizzard · · Score: 4, Informative

      You are way out of date. I use a Transcend 256MB 30x CF card with my camera and it transfers several times quicker over a USB2 connection than a USB1 connection. I bought it 9 months ago, today Transcend's cards are 45x. Kingston's Elite Pro range transfer at 5.2MB per second, well over 3 times USB1.1's 12Mbps. SanDisk's Ultra II CF cards claim a minimum sustained write speed of 9MBps. That's megabytes not megabits.

    9. Re:USB 1.1? by DrEldarion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh come on, it's not THAT bad. I have a 10GB MP3 player that only supports 1.1, and while it takes a little longer than I'd like to write songs to it, it's definitely bearable.

      Plus, since the thing only goes up to 512MB, filling it up won't take a HORRIBLY long time.

      Sheesh, nobody has any patience anymore.

    10. Re:USB 1.1? by djupedal · · Score: 1

      coughipodcough10gbbough25minutescough...

    11. Re:USB 1.1? by Tweaker_Phreaker · · Score: 1

      I said most compact flash cards can't transfer above USB 1.1 speeds. CF cards over 16x are quite pricey (double the price) and generally considered to be 'Professional'.

    12. Re:USB 1.1? by gordgekko · · Score: 1

      I have a Nomad Zen NX but my PC only has USB 1.1. It took about 4 hours, 45 minutes to transfer about 10GB of MP3s.

      Not good but I only have to do it once so that's alright. Now that my collection is on there it only takes a few minutes at most to upload new files.

      --
      You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
    13. Re:USB 1.1? by dastrike · · Score: 1
      (comment on HTML: needs a bloody fraction tag!)

      That's what MathML is for. ;)

      --
      while true; do eject; eject -t; done
    14. Re:USB 1.1? by pantherace · · Score: 1
      And how many non-amaya browsers support it?

      I know about MathML, but I think HTML needs it.

    15. Re:USB 1.1? by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      I said most compact flash cards can't transfer above USB 1.1 speeds. CF cards over 16x are quite pricey (double the price) and generally considered to be 'Professional'.
      Take a look at 64MB cards. Transcend's 45x card is $22, $6 more expensive than the cheapest card they sell. Check out pricewatch.com for more of the same. Can you can back up your statement that most CF cards are slower than 16x with real data? Because everything I've come across says that cards that slow are rare. Transcend don't even manufacture anything slower than 30x.
    16. Re:USB 1.1? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      where you're moving large amounts of data

      Yeah, with a maximum capacity of 512MB, it's gonna take ages...

      Speaking of which, is there even a market for sub-GB mp3 players these days? Even at 128kbps, that's only about a 100 songs.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    17. Re:USB 1.1? by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Don't try to stick the bread and the butter in HTML, for god's sake!!! HTML is crippled enough, thank you very much!

      What we need is wide support for MathML, not a freakin' new batchload of useless tags for 98.7587% of the users/publishers.

    18. Re:USB 1.1? by PingvinRich · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't you mean 98 7587/1000?

    19. Re:USB 1.1? by damiam · · Score: 1
      And how many non-amaya browsers support it?

      You mean other than Mozilla and everything else usuing the Gecko engine?

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    20. Re:USB 1.1? by Fweeky · · Score: 1

      It's going to take longer than it should; that's bad, whichever way you look at it. If people didn't care about waiting a while for things to happen they wouldn't get broadband connections, multi-GHz CPU's and 40x+ CF cards.

      Having said that, CF card readers aren't exactly expensive, and I guess you can always swap the cards about; people seem to manage with CD's and minidisks, although it's not such a big deal if you lose a CD-R compared to an 80UKP CF card ;)

      Vorbis support is good for low bitrates anyway; you get make perfectly good -q-1 (that's quality level minus one; ~60kbps) encodes which will sound fine in the cheapo headphones you'll be using outside. The only problem is most of these "Vorbis capable" players have very limited abilities to do so; low bitrate Vorbis requires more memory to decode, and higher bitrates obviously need more processing, so they tend to only support low-midrange bitrates, and not the useful fairly high and very low ones which are what make Vorbis useful to me :/

      Blegh, wake me up when I can get an 80G player which plays FLAC. In fact, don't bother; I'd rather have a palmtop computer which can just run foobar2000 or so, and be useful for other things too. If you can make it into a decent ultra compact digital camera and a mobile phone as well that would be just great ;)

    21. Re:USB 1.1? by default+luser · · Score: 1

      Just want to say this: a 3x improvement in thoroughput does not make this a closed issue. USB2 implementations cost more than their USB1.1 counterparts. Also, the faster chips certainly cost more, and that price differential most certainly increases with density.

      Let's just look at the memory alone. Let's say wholesale you can cut that price differential in half ($3), and it stays linear with capacity (which it won't, in reality it will be even higher). That's minimum $24 extra you have to pay for 512MB high-speed ram, plus whatever extra for the USB2 chip. that's hard to swallow, since this player is competing with hard drive-based and other flash players at around the $200 mark.

      Just because you can get a solution that can write at 5MB/s doesn't mean it's the right feature for this device. These folks are trying hard to balance price, capacity and features.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    22. Re:USB 1.1? by EvanED · · Score: 1

      "It's going to take longer than it should; that's bad, whichever way you look at it. If people didn't care about waiting a while for things to happen they wouldn't get broadband connections, multi-GHz CPU's and 40x+ CF cards."

      While there is a point here, I also don't think it's a big deal if it takes a while to transfer. The difference between an MP3 player and these is that you don't have to sit there. It's the same reason that you don't really mind downloading a 500MB ISO from the internet, or transcoding a video file, or whatever; you can start it before you go to sleep and run it overnight, or while you're at work, or whatever. All of the examples you give are ones where you are essentially forced to wait. If you go to a website and it takes 10 seconds to load, you're essentially forced to sit there for those 10 sec because it isn't enough time to do other stuff. If you have a 40x CF card in your camera, you can take a higher rate of pictures; you don't have to wait a minute or so for it to finish writing out the buffer. But with the MP3 player, most of the time you're not gonna be in a hurry to use it and don't need to wait around.

    23. Re:USB 1.1? by N1KO · · Score: 1

      Does anyone actually need more than 100 songs on a portable music player? Maybe those who fly from LA to Hong Kong every day, but I can't think of anyone else.

      I've never even had more than 8 hours of music on my playlist at home.

    24. Re:USB 1.1? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      I think you mean "USB 2.0 Full-Speed"

      High-speed is the full 480Mbps spec.
      Or was it that Full-speed is the high 480Mbps spec?
      They're just trying to confuse us!

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    25. Re:USB 1.1? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1
      Does anyone actually need more than 100 songs on a portable music player?

      Us music junkies. I listen to everything from Trip Hop to Metal and everything in between (well,except Polka, Teen Pop and New Country.) Maybe you should expand your horizons. Good new music is hard to find, I'll grant, but it is out there.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    26. Re:USB 1.1? by N1KO · · Score: 1

      I do have a lot of good new music, 31GB of it. I just don't need more than 2 hours when I'm going out. Storing 8 hours to have a bit of selection during that time is good enough.

      Right now it seems too much for music, too little for video and too expensive for anything else.

  7. That is one of the sweetest things I've ever seen by bergeron76 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... assuming it's real and not vaporware.

    I haven't seen any practical OLED apps, and if this is one of them consider me sold on the technology.

    Also, it's worth mentioning that my agency did a fingerprint analysis on the user in the picture and our results have conclusively indicated that she is in fact:

    A NATALIE PORTMAN CLONE!!! We knew it was possible!

    Amen brothers!

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  8. nice unit by bwy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Personally, this form factor (similar to Creative Labs) has some appeal to me. I know everyone says that the HD's in iPods are shock proof and this and that, but for using at the gym or while running, you can't beat this super-mini form factor and solid state construction. Great to see they're offering some value-adds such as ogg support.

    1. Re:nice unit by CoolMoDee · · Score: 1

      I think the iPod Mini + arm band should solve the listening while running problem, sure its not quite solid state, but close enough. But, this player does support ogg, which is 'insanely great'.

      --
      Jisho - A Japanese English German Russian French Dictionary for the rest of us.
    2. Re:nice unit by Herr_Nightingale · · Score: 1

      yeah, and battery life won't suck like the iPod. Seriously, how can Apple sell the things with only 6 useful hours in a charge??? Pretty: yes. Useless: also yes.
      This Jen MP3 player looks like a pimp. Wish they'd sell 'em in Canada.

    3. Re:nice unit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice unit

      Why, thank you!

    4. Re:nice unit by Dever · · Score: 1
      ** sure its not quite solid state, but close enough **

      what? i'm all for people loving macs and all (nice sig btw, where's the site?) but is there any need to recommend an iPod to someone who favors a SOLIDfreakinSTATE device by saying a miniature hard drive is (paraphrasing here) close enough to solid state???

      if anyone i knew told me to get an ipod because it's close enough to sold state, i would brand them a source to be immediately discounted when considering future hardware purchasing decisions.

      need a ruggedized solid state device to take measurements while base jumping? use a powerbook with the included waist strap. it's not quite solid state, but close enough i think you'll find.

      ;)

      for those who still don't get it, solid state, a device with no moving parts

      --
      - I'd prefer not to.
    5. Re:nice unit by Seehund · · Score: 1

      He's probably trying to say that any sub-10,000 RPM HDD is "close enough" to being solid state... Think different, and all that. ;)

      --
      Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
    6. Re:nice unit by JamieF · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >how can Apple sell the things with only 6 useful hours in a charge???

      They don't. They sell it with 8, at least according to the spec sheet. Funny thing: I have one and I take it with me pretty much everywhere. When I'm near power, I'm usually also near a computer with speakers, so I plug it in and play songs off of it while it recharges via the same cable. No big deal. Having run out of battery only once or twice in over six months, I can't really remember how long it took. It's a non-issue for me, though I don't go for ten hour hikes, or whatever it is that you are planning to do with an MP3 player for which a unit with an 8 (or 6?) hour battery life would be "Useless".

      I think that I had forgotten to plug it in for 2 or 3 days when it ran out of battery. That was a tragedy and I cried and cried and shouted to the heavens, "How can they sell something that needs to be recharged? So useless!" Then I hung myself. Oh the humanity. The neighbors shook their heads... "another iPod buyer who couldn't live with only 8 hours of continuous music, and decided to end it all."

      Please.

      My old Rio 500 had a 13 hour battery life off a single AA battery. That was horrible too. The battery life was longer, but I had to lug around this huge second AA battery, and actually take the old one out to recharge it.

      P.S. the Jen MP3 player looks like a remote control from 1962, but who cares what the damn thing looks like since you'll most likely keep it in a pocket all the time. What matters most is how well it works.

    7. Re:nice unit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >for those who still don't get it, solid state, a device with no moving parts

      looks like the 4-way rocker would discount this device too since it moves

    8. Re:nice unit by CoolMoDee · · Score: 1

      My site is down because the httpd is getting ddosed on the server.

      --
      Jisho - A Japanese English German Russian French Dictionary for the rest of us.
    9. Re:nice unit by rikkards · · Score: 1

      My big question is who needs that much music while running, Are you planning on running an UltraMarathon? For me, a couple hundred megs will more than adequately do for a good long run. Plus they are a tad heavy. Mind you if I was a person who needed to have background music in my life I would get an iPod.

  9. Strange thing I noticed... by amarodeeps · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Isn't that a man's hand holding the mirror to allow lipstick to be applied to a woman's face?? Is that a real mirror picture or a graphic overlaid?

    Need more information. Please help.

    1. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by jonman_d · · Score: 1

      It's got to be an overlay - otherwise, you'd see a camera in the reflection.

    2. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by roye · · Score: 4, Funny

      She has man hands.

    3. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by billso · · Score: 1

      Those aren't hands, they're hams. It's really disturbing.

    4. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by clifgriffin · · Score: 0

      Wrong.

    5. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's got to be an overlay - otherwise, you'd see a camera in the reflection.

      Only if the person was actually lookin' at theyself in the mirror. If the person looking into the mirror is seeing a reflection of the camera, it'd look like the picture. They do it in movies all the time.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    6. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's got to be photoshopped, unless the Swede's have 2 left hands. The phone's in a left hand, the lipstick's in a left hand.

    7. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by Twilight1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Either that or this woman has two left hands. Look at the hand in the reflection and look at the hand holding the device. Both left. Wheeee....

      - Twilight1

    8. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by berkut7 · · Score: 1

      Notice the lack of hair (I know it should be on the other side, but there would still be an outline) on the hand/wrist, and also why does everyone asume that a woman has to have long finger nails?

    9. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I'd like to know is, who's feet are in the picture?

      It looks to me like the photo was taken by a guy wearing blue jeans and white socks, sitting down next to the woman in question. But another thing ... are those things on the ground next to the feet sneakers? If so, they are the ugliest looking footwear I've ever seen.

    10. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by Cheval · · Score: 0

      I was looking at her and not the hand holding the player. ;-)

    11. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the face reflected in the mirror is someone standing beside the holder of the mirror?

    12. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by bn557 · · Score: 1

      it's not a phone silly, it's a pda. at least look at the pictures before posting.

      p

      --
      Humans are slow, innaccurate, and brilliant; computers are fast, acurrate, and dumb; together they are unbeatable
    13. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by donnacha · · Score: 5, Funny
      Isn't that a man's hand holding the mirror to allow lipstick to be applied to a woman's face??
      No, despite their glamourous reputation, Swedish women all have manly hands, feet and elbows. It's really quite disturbing but not as bad as Thailand where, as I discovered to my horror, many of the women have penises.
    14. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's actually Larry Wachowski.

    15. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mirror on LED display is an old news. The Japanese people has been enjoying the similiar products on their cell phones for quite some time now.

    16. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by craXORjack · · Score: 3, Funny
      Your right. After all it is from Jens of Sweden. Women over there are different. Most european women don't even shave their legs.

      Q. Know how to tell the bride from the groom at a european wedding?
      A. She's the one with the braided armpits.

      --
      Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    17. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I guess that could be a man's hand, but more striking is that to me it looks like it has "Jesus of Sweden" written on it.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    18. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by euxneks · · Score: 1

      Actually that is a woman's hand.. I think, this being slashdot, most men here are accustomed to girly non-working hands(ie no calluses, scrapes, muscles or tan -> the hands are only used for typing! You geeks!) and therefore think that all girly hands look male.

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    19. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Obviously this was shot in a bowling alley :-)

    20. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by wattersa · · Score: 1

      > Is that a real mirror picture or a graphic overlaid?

      It's a graphic overlay. Note the angle of the device and the size of the hand; we should be seeing the reflection of the camera or the photographer's hand where the face is. Note on the top of the device the chrome band, which seems to contain some of the camera's reflection. Also the lighting on the hand looks like natural light and the face looks like it's under artificial light. Note also the perfect focus on the face but not on the hand. The face was probably taken from a high res. stock photo catalog and the hand from the marketing dept. digital camera. Just a guess ;-)

    21. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by TaGirl_Keri · · Score: 1

      It's a male hand. In a female hand the player would look bigger.

      --
      My fav units are dead Mavs
    22. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by kunudo · · Score: 1

      No, just sausage fingers. Ick...

    23. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But is she a man with a slow hand?

    24. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like mobile phone covers/shells.

    25. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you not be nice and hold a mirror for a Swedish girl? You nerds...

    26. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by insomaniac · · Score: 1

      I know your trying to be funny, but here in .nl most women do shave their legs. And my norwegian, swedish and scottish girlfriends did that as well. So where did that rumour ever come from?

      --
      The way to corrupt a youth is to teach him to hold in higher value them who think alike than those who think differently
    27. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by vrmlguy · · Score: 1

      Of course, the hand in the reflection is, hmmm, how should I say this, REFLECTED!!!!

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    28. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard before that IKEA furniture takes 3 hands to assemble. Maybe the people of Sweden adapted and grew an extra left arm.

    29. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by agallagh42 · · Score: 1

      Yes, we're all well aware that a mirror image is reversed. The hand in the mirror looks like a right hand, meaning it has to be a left hand. Sheesh.

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
    30. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by craXORjack · · Score: 1

      Thanks for clearing that up. I really thought that since I was told by my college German professor who was a woman and who did not shave her legs. She was young and attractive and looked good in shorts by the way.

      But it was long ago and she may have said 'many' rather than 'most'. Also I believe she had lived in Austria. I suppose it makes sense that different parts of Europe are different and whether a person is from the city or countryside.

      What's more, age could make a difference. Ask your mother and grandmother if women shaving legs and armpits is relatively new over there. I am curious what they say about it if you don't mind posting it.

      --
      Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    31. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, its time for me to go to Sweden! :D

    32. Re:Strange thing I noticed... by insomaniac · · Score: 1

      I wouldnt mind posting about it if my mother or one of my grandmothers would be alive, but I know my mother did. She was quite vain.

      --
      The way to corrupt a youth is to teach him to hold in higher value them who think alike than those who think differently
  10. I would like FLAC or Module support. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Now if only it could run FLAC, i would be in love with it. Granted, FLAC is a niche market, but it's one of the things that attracts me to the Rio What-ya-may-call-it. Instead of Portable Audio players hard-coding support for file formats into there player, wouldnt it be nice for them to release an API for plug-ins to allow for a wide range of user customization? Hell, then we can get tux racer and nethack on them ;)

    1. Re:I would like FLAC or Module support. by croddy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      and with 512mb you could store ... 2 albums!

    2. Re:I would like FLAC or Module support. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On an embedded device? Dream on!

    3. Re:I would like FLAC or Module support. by barneyfoo · · Score: 0, Troll

      You flac fanatics are nuts,I tell ya!!! What the hell do you need such huge file sizes for? Are you the same people that pay $6000 for your stereo equipment?

      Take a double blind listening test with a program called "abx" using FLAC and -q5 ogg, and tell me if you find ANY statistically significant differences.

      YOU CAN'T unless you're a goddamn CAT, in which case I'd suggest deliberately causing yourself hearing loss - only a little. No point in suffering a human world with non-human ears. It gives you NOTHING, unless your a secret agent man or something, in which case how human are you really?

    4. Re:I would like FLAC or Module support. by Hast · · Score: 1

      How about never having to re-rip an album again because a better format was released?

      I mean, when we have jpeg, why would we need a lossless format like PNG?

    5. Re:I would like FLAC or Module support. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How about never having to re-rip an album again because a better format was released?


      of course you will; after all, CDs are only 44 kHz, 16 bits -- it's already a lossy format. if the coding is transparent (be it PCM or mp3 or org), who cares if there's data missing? (assuming that the purpose of the recording is for listening, not for instrument extraction down the line or something)
    6. Re:I would like FLAC or Module support. by Hast · · Score: 1

      I think that when there comes a format which stores even more information than CD which becomes established (perhaps DVD Audio?) then you can take that time. If you can actually get hold of new versions of the old music which is actually better than what you have on CD. (Not sure how high the quality is on the masters they use now.)

      My point was that if you ripped a huge collection of CDs in the beginning of MP3s then you'd have to redo all that work in order to turn it into higher quality MP3 or Ogg (or any future format). If you instead rip it to FLAC you can just transcode it. Transcoding between lossy formats is just stupid.

    7. Re:I would like FLAC or Module support. by antin · · Score: 1

      I realize the parent was going for funny, not insightful (good work mods) - but in reality you can fit much more. I have a 128 meg player and using WMA I happily fit 4 hours of music onto it - with 512 megs I could put 16 hours.

      Remember of course that when listening to a portable music player you are generally in noisy environments with bud earphones - and recording at higher quality is just a waste of space, as you really can't hear the difference.

    8. Re:I would like FLAC or Module support. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My point was that FLAC is a lossy format, albeit only because the 44.1kHz/16bit original is a lossy format. Of course converting from mp3 to ogg loses data -- but why would you have to? I'm sure you'll be able to decode mp3s 10 or 20 years from now, so as long as you're happy with the quality of those mp3s now, why isn't that good enough? And if you weren't happy with the quality to begin with (i.e., you compromised quality in order to achieve small file size), you wouldn't have used FLAC to begin with.

    9. Re:I would like FLAC or Module support. by Hast · · Score: 1

      FLAC is NOT a lossy format, that's the entire point of it. That the source itself is not 100% of what was played in a studio is irrelevant.

      Perhaps people like having an entirely open format? Perhaps people like not being tied down with patents? Perhaps people want to make SURE that they can still play the files 10-20 years down the road and not just cross their fingers and hope.

      And a lot of the ripped MP3 are poor quality. When you start playing on high quality equipment it begins to be more apparent and since you can get higher quality today than say 5 years ago why would you want to put up with the old low quality stuff?

      Let me put it like this, if you are completely satisfied with your old MP3 and don't plan on re-ripping fine. If you do take the time to re-rip why not do it to FLAC and save those as well? Then transcode to whatever quality and format you need right now. That way if your new MP3 player handles higher bitrates (my cheap one is best at 128k) you can reencode it as a batch job during the night.

      Central point is this: space is cheap, even with FLAC storing my entire CD collection on disk is not particularly expensive. The time I have to spend to swap discs and ensure correct tagging and such is not cheap however. I have better things to do with my life than watch the progressbar.

  11. MP3 player? What's that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OOOOOoooh, you mean an IPOD CLONE. C'mon, this is Slashdot. Use the proper terminology - once Apple comes out with their own version of a product, even one that's been out for years, any other product like that is a clone of the Apple product.

    Got it?

  12. It has to be said.... by dulles · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anybody got a mirror?

    1. Re:It has to be said.... by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 1
      --
      True story.
    2. Re:It has to be said.... by cozziewozzie · · Score: 1

      Great! Now we can slashdot an MP3 player. Way to go!

  13. Man hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The person holding that MP3 player is almost certainly a man.

    1. Re:Man hand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Swedish men always wear lipstick, you INSENSITIVIE CLOD!

    2. Re:Man hand by morganjharvey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The person holding that MP3 player is almost certainly a man.
      I'm not sure if it is a man holding it, but whoever it is has two left hands. Creepy!

  14. Offical Advertisment Day on Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any other gizmos or gadgets anyone wants to post today? Working on something that you think will be the next big thing, but just need some exposure!?!? Well wait no more for the attention you crave. Slashdot has extended its one day advertisement blitz...

  15. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at that design. Although I wish they would have picked a better name for their company/smaller logo, I love it. Look at the hires images. Peerty!

    1. Re:WOW by wronskyMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      its a MP3 player article where I get to yell WHERE IS THE ACC SUPPORT instead of everyone yelling where is the ODD support.

      And I get to yell WHERE IS THE SPELL CHECKER?

      --
      --- You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you mad- Neal (not Cowboy) Boortz
    2. Re:WOW by ambienceman · · Score: 1

      ODD Support. I have ADD. Do they have ADD support?

  16. Re:That is one of the sweetest things I've ever se by p3d0 · · Score: 1

    Except clones don't share fingerprints.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  17. But.... by taxevader · · Score: 3, Funny

    ..does it play Ogg Vorbis?

    --
    -Copyright law #69:Whenever Mickey Mouse is about to enter the public domain,copyrights get extended by 25 years.
    1. Re:But.... by suyashs · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding me? This device's internal specs are so far behind (usb 1.1 etc.) that I am beginning to doubt that it plays MP3 VBRs.....

      --
      http://chrono.posterous.com/
    2. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can understand you not reading the links but did you at least read the headline text or the article title?

      Jens Of Sweden MP3 Player With OLED, Ogg

    3. Re:But.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note: Ogg != Ogg Vorbis
      Can you not catch the humor? Are you retarded?

  18. Argh Matey! by Garrett+Combs · · Score: 5, Funny

    "And now with our included mirror, you can insure that your eye patch is correctly aligned so your other (music) pirate friends don't point and laugh!" Argh!

    --
    Insert witty Slashdot sig here.
    1. Re:Argh Matey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sigh*

      (-1, Stupid)

    2. Re:Argh Matey! by moltar77 · · Score: 1

      I understand ye enthusiasm, matie. After all, who doesn't like to talk like a pirate? At least we only have four and a half more months to wait, eh?

      ARRRR!!

  19. What's with the marketing? by AirLace · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This looks like a great product, as I'm sure anyone who's looking for a solid state Ogg Player will agree, but the website is a joke, and is bound to alienate the customers they are trying to market to. Just hitting the front page, I get an unrecognised "Flash animation" in the middle of the screen and get booted into a plugin download page. Surely most people will want to see pictures of the product, not some silly Flash animation (Has anyone seen the content of this -- is it at all useful?)

    Something also strikes me as strange with their software requirements list: Windows 98-SE/ME/2000/XP
    Mac OS 8.6 or newer (Linux as well)
    -- What's the deal with that? If it supports Linux, they can add it to the list. Do they really thing that putting one of their best features it in brackets like an afterthought is going to help endear their product to Linux users?

    1. Re:What's with the marketing? by Scutter · · Score: 2, Informative

      Surely most people will want to see pictures of the product, not some silly Flash animation

      I hate waiting for flash animations to load, but in this case, the flash animations *are* the pictures you're looking for.

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    2. Re:What's with the marketing? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Do they really thing that putting one of their best features it in brackets like an afterthought is going to help endear their product to Linux users?

      You think that's bad, the front page doesn't mention that it can has an Ogg Vorbis codec!

      This is huge news for those of us that choose not to use patent-encumbered formats.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    3. Re:What's with the marketing? by value_added · · Score: 1

      My own opinion is that it's a beautiful looking site which I think reflects on the products designed by this company.

      Shame that "flash" has become synonymous with "animated advertising" to some. Maybe they'd feel better if they saw it put to the "other" uses it's known for?

    4. Re:What's with the marketing? by Adam9 · · Score: 1

      Do they have a flash spell checker?

    5. Re:What's with the marketing? by cujo_1111 · · Score: 1

      Do they really thing that putting one of their best features it in brackets like an afterthought is going to help endear their product to Linux users?

      Do you really think that the majority of customers, being Windows users, really give a shit?

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    6. Re:What's with the marketing? by AirLace · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that the majority of customers, being Windows users, really give a shit?

      Er, no. But the minority -- Linux users -- would probably prefer their operating system listed without a pair of superfluous brackets.

    7. Re:What's with the marketing? by Arker · · Score: 1

      I hate waiting for flash animations to load, but in this case, the flash animations *are* the pictures you're looking for.

      I wouldn't mind having one of these at all, and since I live in Sweden I can probably head right down to the store and pick one up, but I still have to say there's absolutely no excuse for such poor web design. Maybe I'll take a look at some competing products first.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    8. Re:What's with the marketing? by Seehund · · Score: 1

      ... which I think reflects on the products designed by this company.

      This company doesn't design products. They rebrand products and jack up the original price.

      Too bad that Jens Of Korea^H^H^H^H^HSweden's only "product" of their own, i.e. the brand (logotype), is so horribly ugly and amateurish looking IMO.

      --
      Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
    9. Re:What's with the marketing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "YOUR ON THE AIR"

      YOUR ALL GAY YUO GRAMMER NASIS! ;)

      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
      Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.


      Yep, you're quite right in that observation. Duh.

    10. Re:What's with the marketing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Linux users -- would probably prefer their operating system listed without a pair of superfluous brackets.

      Then they are a bunch of oversensitive whiny bitches and should calm the fuck down about bloody brackets.

      "I have a dream, that one day not only will my niche OS be supported as though it had more than 2% desktop market share, but that the tyranny of elitist brackets shall be banished from the face of the earth."

  20. Re:MP3 player? What's that? by crazyfreakid · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's not an iPod clone simply because it's a flash media MP3 player, not a hard drive MP3 player like an iPod is.

  21. WTF? OGG Support? Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [sarcasm]I thought OGG was a second rate codec that only 5 people on slashdot used? Why in the world would a hardware company release a new product that supports such a useless codec like OGG when the defacto standard MP3 is good enough?[/sarcasm]

  22. Re:That is one of the sweetest things I've ever se by crackshoe · · Score: 1

    While twins don't share fingerprints, i'd really like to see your source on clones not sharing fingerprints. i mean, just out of curiousity.

    --
    Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
  23. Dude I bet she couldn't dance on her hands! by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 5, Funny

    I find the ad disturbing- why two left hands????

    Look at the photo yourself- that's weird huh?

    +5 Observant

    1. Re:Dude I bet she couldn't dance on her hands! by FiReaNGeL · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's in a mirror.

      Right--> Looks like Left

      It... invert things, ya know? :)

    2. Re:Dude I bet she couldn't dance on her hands! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And which hand do you imagine is holding the camera?

    3. Re:Dude I bet she couldn't dance on her hands! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot.

    4. Re:Dude I bet she couldn't dance on her hands! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay. Try reproducing that image with a mirror. Lipstick optional.

    5. Re:Dude I bet she couldn't dance on her hands! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just look at the direction of the hand in the mirror.. the arm would lead down to the left arm of the holder.

    6. Re:Dude I bet she couldn't dance on her hands! by utahjazz · · Score: 1

      Far more disturbing is the fact that the hand holding the player is clearly a man's hand, an the other a woman's.

    7. Re:Dude I bet she couldn't dance on her hands! by T0t0r0_fan · · Score: 1

      I guess they were just too lazy to make a proper photo of a mirror(which isn't that always easy), and were really rushing to put the picture together ;) +5 Observant is well deserved anyways, for sure :)

    8. Re:Dude I bet she couldn't dance on her hands! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because her right hand is reflected in the mirror, silly, so it only looks like her left.

    9. Re:Dude I bet she couldn't dance on her hands! by psoriac · · Score: 1

      Those are man hands, man!

      --
      I browse Slashdot at +3, Funny
    10. Re:Dude I bet she couldn't dance on her hands! by flamingmoose · · Score: 1

      Maybe I had too much coffee this morning, but ... I see a right hand in the mirror. Meaning it must be a left hand. Which was the point of the original poster.

      --

      .sigs - is there anything they can't do?
  24. Alternative version available? by taxevader · · Score: 5, Funny

    As a true blue slashdotter, I have a bit of an acne problem. Can I get one without the mirror?

    --
    -Copyright law #69:Whenever Mickey Mouse is about to enter the public domain,copyrights get extended by 25 years.
    1. Re:Alternative version available? by geoffeg · · Score: 1

      What mirror? Oh, in the picture. That's not a mirror, that image comes with the device. Soon they're going to start offering images of different ladies putting on lipstick with their hands in strange positions.

      But forget the mirror thing. Explain THIS image: http://www.jensofsweden.com/media/MP-300/MP-300_5_ web.jpg

  25. Likely to be pretty expensive by phatsharpie · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hammacher Schlemmer, the listed reseller of Jens of Sweden's product in the US, has one of the older models - the MP110 - for $249.95 with 256MB of storage.

    http://www.hammacher.com/publish/70549.asp?promo =e l_audio

    I would think this model, the MP130, would be at least as expensive, but likely more.

    -B

    1. Re:Likely to be pretty expensive by irokitt · · Score: 2, Informative

      $219.95 USD at Outward Sound. There are only two places to buy the thing in the US though-there and at Hammacher Schlemmer, like you mentioned. Definitely a very appealing toy, but I know *I* don't have $220 lying around right now.

      --
      If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
    2. Re:Likely to be pretty expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.webhallen.com (rather expensive swedish online shop) sells these with various memory configurations.

      128 mb - 1700 sek (~ $212)
      256 mb - 2200 sek (~ $275)
      512 mb - 2800 sek (~ $350)

      electronics is usually (with cellphones being the exception) >20% more expensive in Sweden then in the US (partly due to our 25% sales tax and higher retail margins). So if it's imported in bigger volumes to the US you might see them for as low as $150-$160.

    3. Re:Likely to be pretty expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Or for $25 more you can upgrade to a unit with 4GB and Firewire.

  26. Is it just me?.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. or does that look like a man's hand holding the mp3 player? From the angle, orientation of the hand, and the activity (applying lipstick) it's obvious the advertisers want us to think it's an attractive women holding the mp3 player to apply lipstick.

    I get the feeling that women's face was photoshoped in, and not an actual reflection. But when were ads "touched up" (fast food commercials, SI swim suit issue, etc. etc.)

  27. Re:MP3 player? What's that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Details, details. It's an mp3 player, so it's an iPod clone. Just like any PDA is a Newton clone, and any GUI is an Apple OS ripoff. X-Box? Pippin ripoff. Blaster worm? Appletalk ripoff. ;)

  28. 256mb of good looks by amichalo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Okay, that's just cool looking and I give them huge props on the look and feel. Even the USB-port-slide-out-feature is very cool. Not as certain about the "joystick" feature.

    But what is with the 256MB capacity? I am not trying to be an Apple zelot here, but with the iPod Mini, hasn't Apple really drawn a line in the sand where Style and 4GB capacity intersect at a sub $250 price point?

    The way I see it, no one who ever uses a high capacity digital music player (remember back when we called them MP3 players?) will ever go BACK to a low capacity sub 100 song player. Just won't happen. You get hooked on the ability BROWSE.

    But anyway, nice looking toy

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    1. Re:256mb of good looks by 1lus10n · · Score: 3, Insightful

      actually there is a reason to use one of these: no moving parts.

      Most of the sub 2G mp3 players availible are solid state flash storage, where the ipods are actual hard drives.

      Hard drives (dont give a damn about how they are mounted) fail when exposed to vibration, such as running or even riding a subway.

      Of course this being slashdot i dont expect many people to be runners ...

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    2. Re:256mb of good looks by Herr_Nightingale · · Score: 1
      no one who ever uses a high capacity digital music player (remember back when we called them MP3 players?) will ever go BACK to a low capacity sub 100 song player
      I wouldn't give up my flash player's ability to go jogging with me, and the battery life is about 5 times better than the 3rd-gen iPod (I haven't tried the Mini, which is probably better - certainly can't be worse).
      I'd take this Jens player over any iPod. Apple's style doesn't interest me (and I suspect a fair amount of other people feel the same way) if it comes with too many penalties:

      iTunes, (try it on a PC)
      the dock (don't know about the Mini), (or buy an extra cable here)
      unacceptable battery life,
      moving parts,
      no ogg vorbis,
      too damned big.
      Plus there's no radio, no voice recording unless you spend a lot more and plug in an extra piece, no line-in recording w/real-time encoding.

      There's a market for iPod, but this Jens player is another beast entirely. People will buy it. Apple hasn't 'drawn a line in the sand' at all, except for mini-hard drive players.
      The iPod is not for everybody.
    3. Re:256mb of good looks by timeOday · · Score: 1
      This thing weighs less than half of an IPod mini. It has no moving parts and is likely to have better battery life. If it is like previous Jens models it has a built-in radio, and a sound recorder. So there are significant advantages.

      The nicest model has 512 megs. That's close to a CDR, which is what my Sony Mp3 Discman plays. I use it for exercising. It's easy to change the disk, but how often do I do that? Rarely. An hour of running is quite a while (try it!) and half a gig is about 10 hours at 128kbps (I suspect 96kps would be fine for working out but I don't bother resampling).

      Are there times when browsing is a bonus? Sure, that's why I use my laptop for music at work or the library (80 gigs and a 1600x1200 display). But for working out this thing should be perfect. I take it back, it would be perfect with a double-digit price :)

    4. Re:256mb of good looks by aussersterne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I take the subway all the time with my 4GB microdrive-based player (Creative Muvo) and I keep it in my front trousers pocket as I walk about the city. The damn thing has been dropped a few times (because it's so light and small it's easy to lose track of it physically). I've had no trouble, the filesystem is intact, there's no trace of unwanted head noise (i.e. click-clickety-click) or worn bearings whine. At some point I wonder if the platters and heads are so tiny and light that the physics are more forgiving to motion of all but the most extreme kinds... of course the hard drives in the iPod and iPod mini are of different sizes, so I'd expect the full-size iPods to suffer more stress.

      There was a smattering of trouble with earlier CF microdrives, but considering the fact that most of the 1GB microdrives were used by pro digital photographers in intense environments (warzones, sports venues, etc.) and are still in use today, I'd say that microdrives aren't nearly as susceptible to trouble as some would think.

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    5. Re:256mb of good looks by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression (possibly mistaken) that the ipod mini's were using a very small regular hard drive, not a CF based storage ??

      I was not saying (sorry if it seemed that way) that the ipod or ipod mini would die upon contact. The do however have much much shorter lifetime's (and higher pricetags). The lifetime will be lower for anything that has moving parts, although the weight of the heads and platters might help small vibrations over time will lead to life degradation.

      I would actually like to see an unbiased study on this, the life expectancy of mp3/ogg/wma portables and the effect of certain conditions on that life expectancy.

      Also of note: I have dropped several actual hard drives varying distances and have had no "just dead" drive's, most of them did however die within 6 months (with one exception.)

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    6. Re:256mb of good looks by modipodio · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean this thing looks amazing but can one really justify paying so much for so little capacity ? I think the looks, the ogg support, the radio, the microphone and the form factor could swing it for some people (they nearly got me) but the price of this thing and the thought that you could just get an ipod mini for cheaper or an ipod for in and around the same price is sickening. I couldn't buy something like this with a clear consiounce but having said that I am really really tempted. If this was $150 - $180 I would probably cave and buy but I have a feeling its going to be more like $250-$300+.

      --
      __________________________________________________ "UNIX is a fascist state, Windows is a democracy.
    7. Re:256mb of good looks by mst76 · · Score: 1
      I was under the impression (possibly mistaken) that the ipod mini's were using a very small regular hard drive, not a CF based storage ??
      The iPod-mini drive is a Hitachi hard disk in standard CF form factor, i.e., if fits anywhere a CF card would fit. But it is not their retail Microdrive. A CF card can operate in 3 modes: True-IDE, Memory and IO, just like regular PCMCIA (CF is just a small PCMCIA card). IO-mode is used for modems and network cards and such. Most cameras address a CF card in Memory mode, but the iPod drive only implements True-IDE mode. This is why it won't work in cameras, but should work in a PC with a CF-IDE pin adapter. The Muvo uses a standard Microdrive, which also works in memory mode.
    8. Re:256mb of good looks by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      got it. thanks.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
  29. is it just me?.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. or does that look like a man's hand holding the mp3 player?

    From the angle, orientation of the hand, and the activity (applying lipstick) it's obvious the advertisers want us to think it's an attractive women holding the mp3 player to apply lipstick.

    I get the feeling that women's face was photoshoped in, and not an actual reflection. But when were ads "touched up" (fast food commercials, SI swim suit issue, etc. etc.)

  30. Me wonders by Pranjal · · Score: 1, Redundant

    ..if it's targetted at women?

    "What song is playing, let me check, oh shoot my hair is all messy. My good old jens of sweden MP3 player, let's me pretty up anytime i want"
    prrrr

    1. Re:Me wonders by iabervon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, it seems to be targetted at geek guys who think that, if they were carrying around a mirror, attractive women would stand close to them while putting on makeup.

    2. Re:Me wonders by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Except for one thing:
      Attractive women doesnt need makeup.

    3. Re:Me wonders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does not imply they're not applying it.

    4. Re:Me wonders by nule.org · · Score: 1

      Most women would do well to avoid the geeky looking guy holding a mirror.

  31. yes, man... mirror, bad... by chaos421 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    yes, the person holding the player is very manly, at least. also i think the mirror idea is really bad. i have a sony ericsson t610 and the dang thing has fingerprints on it all the time. so with this player, in order to see yourself, you'd have to bring along something to wipe the smudges off. when i read the article, i thought the player was going to be in the shape of a hand held mirror (eg. the one in beauty and the beast)

    1. Re:yes, man... mirror, bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its called a shirt (for the smudges), and my t610 gets shitty reception. boo hiss for their crummy antenna

  32. Totally ... by BlackShirt · · Score: 1

    buffling news for nerds, isnt it? a mirror, gushhh. :)

  33. Two Left Hands by Goldenhawk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >Isn't that a man's hand holding the mirror to allow
    >lipstick to be applied to a woman's face??

    It had BETTER be a different person, or they have two left hands...

    *grin*

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

    1. Re:Two Left Hands by MullaH · · Score: 1

      two left hands is not too bad, the right hand is needed to make the picture itself

  34. OLED? What gave you that idea? by ajlitt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Did anyone actually spot anything on their site that mentions that the display is OLED? Looks to me more like the OEL (Organic EL) display that some newer car stereos have (new Pioneers, etc). Last I heard blue OLED had some MTBF troubles...

    1. Re:OLED? What gave you that idea? by helge · · Score: 1

      The press release (http://www.jensofsweden.com/media/MP-130/Pressmed delande-JOS-MP-130-040504-sv.pdf) which is in Swedish, claims that the display is OLED.

      "Spegelspelarens 96 x 40 mm skärm bygger på ny organisk LED-teknik (Organic Light Emitting Display)." which translates to
      "The 96 x 40 mm screen of the mirror player is built on an organic LED technology ..."

    2. Re:OLED? What gave you that idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it does look like the LEDs on the LGVX6000, those are OLEDs for a fact.

  35. iPod's already a mirror. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use the back of my iPod as a mirror all the time. Unless you're irresponsible and have an extremely scratched up iPod back...

  36. iPods can double as mirrors as well by gotr00t · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Though they don't use OLED technology, the Apple iPod can also double as a "mirror." Its chorme caseback is reflective, with only minimal distortion.

    That is, if you can keep it clean and free of scratches. I know some people who have their caseback so badly scratched up that its pretty much lost its reflective properties.

    1. Re:iPods can double as mirrors as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Man, I've got a three year old iPod and it looks like someone took a Brillo pad to the chrome. That said, who cares? In another couple of years, I'll be able to get something twice as good for $75.

      Or, I could head to the dollar store and buy a mirror ten times bigger for, ummm, a dollar.

  37. Yeah, but... by sirReal.83. · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes yes, -1 Redundant. But no one's posted about it yet. Does it work with Linux? A friend of mine has an earlier model, and it doesn't seem to get detected as a USB mass storage device under 2.4.2x. He's a captive windows user and this is one of the main reasons he can't drop it completely.

    I'd try it on 2.6.5, but he doesn't want to upgrade (?!) and he uses it too much to lend it to me to hack with. So do any of you fellow linux-only users have one of Jens' recent units working?

    1. Re:Yeah, but... by Chmarr · · Score: 3, Informative

      It probably DOES work, but you need to tell linux that a 'vendor 1234, device 2345' (or whatever it is) needs to be activated with the usb-flash driver.

      Dinking around with the ID/Driver database generally solves my 'compatibilty' problems. Even with modern kernels, unless the company, or a fan of the device, decides to submit the mapping to the linux project, it'll remain 'apparently' incompatible.

    2. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, no sarcasm at all intended, but that was truly an informative and useful answer. It also convinced me to wait another six months, at least, before abandoning XP.

    3. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a JOS MP-110 and it works flawlessly in Linux. Just plug it in and mount the appropriate device.

      I would guess this newer model works in the same way.

    4. Re:Yeah, but... by xzoon · · Score: 1

      It works great, I'm using the older MP-100 with 2.4.21 and all I needed to do was to activate USB Mass Storage and a couple of other things, don't remember exactly which but there weren't any special, just the usual.

      Then, it was just to plug it in and mount. :)

    5. Re:Yeah, but... by AlphaPB · · Score: 1

      Based on my experience with a Creative Muvo2, 2.6 seems to be way more compatible than 2.4 in terms of the player being detected as a USB storage device.

      Upgrading the kernel is relatively painless... at least it's less painful than rebooting to Windows whenever you want to transfer files.

      Just figure out your fstab line and it's quite easy to start moving music to the player. I believe the drive should show up at /dev/sdX.

      Of course, I haven't had the chance to try a Jens, but I suspect that the interface should be rather similar if Windows can autodetect the drive without drivers.

    6. Re:Yeah, but... by jhdsl · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, I have a JOS, MP100. It just comes up as an USB hard drive, so it is a no brainer to get it to work on Linux. The bad part is that firware upgrade can only be done from MS Windows, not even Mac.

    7. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The swedish page says:

      System KRAV
      Windows 98SE/ME/2000/XP, Mac 8.6 eller senare Linux 2.4.0 eller senare.

      Which means, it'll work with Linux >= 2.4

    8. Re:Yeah, but... by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

      That's interesting. Is there a website that lists various mappings for different products? If not, is there a reason why it couldn't be created?

      I'd be interested in doing something about it if there is sufficient demand.

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
    9. Re:Yeah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  38. Re:That is one of the sweetest things I've ever se by thefinite · · Score: 1

    If twins don't share fingerprints, why *would* clones share them? Same DNA for both, right?

    --
    Boom Shanka
  39. OGG Players' Killer App by TwinkieStix · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been to the vorbis site and listened to the ogg samples (Scroll down to the bottom and listen to the 45k/sec samples) of low bit rate compression. It sounds really good at really low bit rates. Scroll up a little and listen to the mp3s at 64 and 128, and then listen to the OGG at 64. That's the quality of mp3 at 1/2 the space.

    Couldn't these companies take better advantage of the ability to play OGG files and include the compressor to actually fit more music in less space? They could advertise a player that holds "more music" in a less expensive package. Instead of advertising the storage space, advertise the number of hours of music, and compare to competitors that cost 2x as much.

    1. Re:OGG Players' Killer App by pashdown · · Score: 1

      Time to turn around reverend, the choir has heard enough.

    2. Re:OGG Players' Killer App by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "mp3 quality," eh? That's like saying a car is built to the exacting standards of a Yugo, or a piece of equipment is as cutting-edge as the US rail system.

    3. Re:OGG Players' Killer App by cozziewozzie · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, but most people don't encode their music to OGG. They download MP3s/WMAs/whatever and put them on their players.

      You do understand that transcoding from MP3 to OGG means absolutely shitty quality regardless on what bitrate you use? The result is always worse than what you started with.

  40. Othe great products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else check out the "His and Her" .. um .. rectal probes?

    1. Re:Othe great products by slycer9 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm suddenly struck with a strange feeling after realizing I actually clicked on a 'Rectal Probes' link...

      Have to remember THAT one for the shrink.

      --
      Don't park drunk, accidents cause people.
    2. Re:Othe great products by Peeet · · Score: 1

      You think that's bad, try clicking here. It seems to be some sort of "tampon recharging" device... with wing!

      Everything feels like it was designed by a woman from this company. Even the name of the company and the logo. There's no appreciation for the hard edged right-angle logos.

      -5 Sexist? I dunno...

  41. HiSpeed by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 1

    Don't forget that the main point of USB 2.0 is dun-na-na-na!: Marketing!!! What they really need us USB 2.0 High Speed XP 10.4 Second Edition Tiger MX Superfly X800 Ultra Extreme Inferno. That is if you want to benefit from greater than 12 Mbps transfer speeds.

    but I'll stick with firewire.

    1. Re:HiSpeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget that the main point of USB 2.0 is dun-na-na-na!: Marketing!!!

      No, the main point of USB2.0 is speed .
      And you, sir, are a troll and an irritant, like all your mac fan-boy ilk. Go away.

    2. Re:HiSpeed by EvanED · · Score: 1

      No, 2.0 doesn't mean faster than 1.1. Remember the name change? USB 2.0 High Speed is just USB 1.1. You need USB 2.0 Full Speed.

      Most sleazy thing I've seen in computer marketing IMO... (even above most of what MS does)

  42. Not made in sweden. by shikra · · Score: 4, Informative

    Would be good if the player is actually made and designed in Sweden. Too bad it's not. Fact is, the flash-based MP3 player market is largely dominated by the koreans.

    1. Re:Not made in sweden. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      To paraphraise Back to the Future pt. III:

      "What do you mean, Doc? All the best stuff is made in Korea."

    2. Re:Not made in sweden. by Kidbro · · Score: 1

      Would be good if the player is actually made and designed in Sweden.

      Question #1: Why?
      Question #2: Isn't it?

      I wouldn't know or sure, but there's a good chance that the thing is designed in Sweden, but manufactured and assembled in Korea. That's the way it's usually done.

  43. Re:That is one of the sweetest things I've ever se by crackshoe · · Score: 1

    But... hollywood shows that clones share spoooooooky connections - unlike twins (except in those movies that are otherwise). Or, more simply put, tequila and slashdot do not mix.

    --
    Don't worry - its just stigmata. Pass me a napkin and don't you dare tell my mother.
  44. Try it. by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Try to pose your hands like that in a mirror. You'd have to have some pretty funky elbows or a reality distortion field or something.

    I guess the RSD(TM) is already patented

    1. Re:Try it. by binarybum · · Score: 4, Funny

      remember this is coming from sweden. for all we know people could look totally different over there.

      --
      ôó
  45. anti-iPod bashing = bad by amichalo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I agree that bashing a product or post the lifts up a product, simply because it is not made by Apple is bad. However, i would not go as far as to say we shouldn't be allowed to automatically hold the product to the standard Apple has set.

    After all, Apple has created a 'reference standard' for the digital media player industry by which all other digital media players are, in my opinion, rightly judged. The same holds true for Windows. Apple Linux and before it Unix were and remain compared to Windows, the reference standard for desktop OS.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    1. Re:anti-iPod bashing = bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What standart has apple set, exactly?

      The expensive and fragile but fashionable one?

    2. Re:anti-iPod bashing = bad by JW+Troll · · Score: 1

      Apple hasn't actually created any kind of standard, save only in a narrowly defined sub-range of portable music devices.

      The iPod has too many drawbacks, which means that players like this Jens unit are in a completely different category:
      iPod requires the terrible iTunes software
      hard-drive based, so you can't take it jogging
      terrible battery life on the iPod
      iPod requires all kinds of extras to do basic things (record from radio, etc)
      iPod doesn't act as UMS device
      iPods are huge, even when called "Mini." Jens is tiny.
      iPods don't broadcast in FM radio w/o an add-on (expensive too)
      iPods don't just plug in to the computer - they need docks or cables

      I think it's kinda stupid to hold this Jens unit to any 'standard' set by apple. They're not even remotely comparable, but for completely different buyers.

      --
      just like the humble blood clot... turboporsche@telus.net
  46. WOW by falcon5768 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    its a MP3 player article where I get to yell WHERE IS THE ACC SUPPORT instead of everyone yelling where is the ODD support.

    kinda refreshing in a way :-D

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  47. Re:That is one of the sweetest things I've ever se by jx100 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Clones are basically artificially created twins...

    Fingerprints are formed during fetal developement and are not determined entirely by DNA

  48. It Ain't Vapor; It's IOPS by kjoonlee · · Score: 4, Informative

    IOPS players have been on sale in Korea for some time now.

    1. Re:It Ain't Vapor; It's IOPS by jepoirrier · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's an ism IOPS 256 Mb that you can buy elsewhere in Europe like digimania.be (http://www.digimania.be/en/prod_pix.asp?ProductID =463).

      Yes, it plays MP3. Yes, it plays OGG. Yes, it's "only" USB 1.1. For Linux support, it works like any other (USB) memory stick. I bought one for my brother. This device works fine except for the earphone jack that is becoming lose.

  49. Scratches by RucasRiot · · Score: 1, Redundant

    How long will the surface of that stay reflective? The back of my iPod which was a nice mirror is now scuffed to hell. Do you think the same would happen in this scenario as well?

    --
    Props to GNAA!
  50. The Mirror Will Make This a Hit by donnacha · · Score: 5, Interesting


    Although most of us will see the mirror display as, at best, a novel cosmetic touch, I've shown these pictures to a girl I happened to have about the place and her response was instant enthusiasm.

    She pointed out that it's always good to have a mirror handy, especially in situations where you aren't carrying your usual bag-of-tricks, such as when you're jogging - with one of these and a tube of lippy in her pocket, a girl would be ready for anything.

    Her one criticism was that that small mic hole, right in the middle of that otherwise unobstructed stretch, would be an irritating distraction for anyone giving their make-up a quick check. I figure that such an infrequently used feature could have been placed elsewhere without affecting its utility. Also, I think they should have extended the right up to or even around the corners, increasing the mirror's ease of use (I presuming that the mirror is just a protective fascia placed over the actual OLED display).

    At the right price point (and I think it is), this could seriously challenge Apple's mostly female targetted Mini ipod.

    1. Re:The Mirror Will Make This a Hit by JohnsonWax · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've shown these pictures to a girl I happened to have about the place

      Hmm, you typically keep girls strewn about your place? That's not a bad idea...

    2. Re:The Mirror Will Make This a Hit by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      Any woman who worries about how she looks when jogging -- to the point of carrying lipstick -- has some serious issues.

    3. Re:The Mirror Will Make This a Hit by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      Yes, and as men we've sworn to take advantage of these issues!

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    4. Re:The Mirror Will Make This a Hit by kidgenius · · Score: 1

      You'd truly be amazed by the number of women that put on makeup before working out at the gym, so they look good while working out. There are also quite a few women that will put on makeup when they goto bed to look good for the guy they are with. It's nuts.

    5. Re:The Mirror Will Make This a Hit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, they're called 'wife' and 'daughter'

  51. Follow the money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I wonder how much of a kickback OSDN gets for every

    sale of these MP3 players. Or was the above

    designed to hurt sales, or perhaps OSDN is now

    in the hardware review business to compete with

    Ziff-Davis. Nah. Someone's knob is getting greased.

    - The Fucker

  52. Re:More information on the person in this picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn you, you got me :(

  53. Re:That is one of the sweetest things I've ever se by modecx · · Score: 3, Funny

    If Natalie Portman has hands like that, you can keep her (it)?.

    Eeek.

    --
    Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  54. Close, but not quite. by kjoonlee · · Score: 3, Informative

    Tell me what you see here: IOPS

    1. Re:Close, but not quite. by Interruach · · Score: 5, Funny

      i see a box telling me to install macromedia flash.

    2. Re:Close, but not quite. by Anonymous+Chicken · · Score: 1

      Your comment made me want to look... in Opera of course...
      After seeing the page, it continued to load... and load... and load...
      and finally 7 megabytes later, it displayed the same page.

      Now I'm used to not seeing everything while using Opera, but 7 megabytes for nothing??? That better be a damn good and informative flashthingy...

      --
      This signature is intentionally left blank.
  55. Yes, it will work. by kjoonlee · · Score: 3, Informative

    It will work with Linux 2.4+, according to the manufacturer.

  56. Irony 101... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's amazing how many people on Slashdot can't spot irony even when it's smacking them in the face.

    Presumably, the person who modded the parent post as "redundant" and the two ACs who added useless replies fall into this category.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    1. Re:Irony 101... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Umm... its just a joke. Theres nothing ironic about it that I can see.

      Hint: in future use a dictionary for word definitions instead of relying on Alanis Morisette.

    2. Re:Irony 101... by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      No offence intended to either you or the parent of your post, but making a joke about "does it support Ogg" is a little lame when the article blurb clearly states that it does. That's about as funny as the guy in the Linux Smartphones article who asked "But do they run Linux?"

      As in, well, not really funny.

      And in spite of my sig, I'd have to say that would get a "fair" meta-mod.

      p

  57. indeed by Too+Much+Noise · · Score: 1

    It's a male left hand holding the mirror for a woman. As pointed before, another hand would hold the camera (male right hand). Also note the camera angle - almost vertical (judging from the position of the shoes in the background) and still from the left of the woman in the mirror. How many left hands would have been needed for only one actor?

    Weird effect anyway - they should have thought this through more.

  58. Funny Picture by Yavi · · Score: 1

    Look under their pictures section for the picture that shows the device being used as a mirror. It has a woman putting on her lipstick as the image being reflected. Okay, great. Now look at the hand. Does that look like it belongs to a beautiful woman?

    1. Re:Funny Picture by itsdave · · Score: 2, Funny

      and if you look a little closer you will notice... they are both left hands.

  59. Re:That is one of the sweetest things I've ever se by pangel83 · · Score: 1

    Samsung e700. I am holding it in my hand right now, and it's organic external display is just fabulus.

  60. no glasses, huh? by x_tender · · Score: 1

    Don't you ever wear (sun)glasses, do you?

  61. College basketball? by oldosadmin · · Score: 1

    ACC support? I'm sure it'd hold OGG or MP3 encoded ACC (Atlantic Coast Conference) basketball games. That'll really get ya yelling.

    --
    Jay | http://oldos.org
  62. OLED == OEL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Organic Light Emitting Diode is the original name for the technology.

    Other companies came out with different names like Organic Electro-Luminescent.

    I, for one, am glad that these displays are getting into more gear, it will only drive the technology onwards.

    1. Re:OLED == OEL by ajlitt · · Score: 3, Informative

      OLED implies a thin-film organic LED. If it's an LED, I expect a device that behaves like a P-N junction and operates at low voltages like a standard silicon or other inorganic LED. Organic Electroluminescent is totally different. OEL is a monolithic material that fluoresces under high voltages and low currents. OEL is what is used for backlights for many portable devices and is ultimately not as efficient as OLED (because of the HV stepup) and does not have as easily a tunable color range as OLED.

      So who told you that they were the same thing, huh?

  63. Re:Not so fast. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ya, but if it isn't in English I wouldn't trust it. I'm not saying this as a nationalist remark, just in my experience. Stuff that comes from the Far east has not Copyright laws on it. They can claim anything and not worry about false advertising. I'd get another reference.

  64. List 'play time' instead ? No by Animaether · · Score: 1

    No, I don't think so.
    What is that play time based on ? 128kbit/s ? 64kbit/s ? 32kbit/s mono ?
    Even if they said 'CD quality', style.. it would depends on whichever test said it sounded like the original CD of song X as heard by randomguy Y.

    No. Storage space, in megabytes or so, is much more convenient, as you can determine for yourself how much music you can store on it - based on your actual files.

  65. Product Design by entitude · · Score: 1

    This is really everything that I want, except for the fact that it's only 512 MBs of memory. Here's to hoping that they make a hdd-based version.

    --
    ----geppy -
    1. Re:Product Design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I think you should expect more out of life than just a shiny mp3-player.

  66. SanDisk ultra II by morcheeba · · Score: 1

    My short review on the SanDisk Ultra II: I wasn't able to reach anywhere near the claimed speed with my G4 laptop and a PCMCIA adaptor, reading or writing. The 8x lexar that came with my camera (1.2Mbyte/sec) felt faster using the same setup.

    I just did a speed test using 'time cp' - 13372kB in 5 files, transfered in 9.19 seconds = 1445 kB/sec = 10x 9000 kB/sec.

    Of course, that's reading and not writing. And my cache wasn't cleared... but both of those things should have made it faster.

    1. Re:SanDisk ultra II by GoRK · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you were actually using a PCMCIA 16 bit adaptor then it's likely that you couldn't reach near 9MB/s anyway. PIO 16 bit with no buffering (there probably isn't any in your CF PCMCIA adaptor) is going to be slow as heck. The connection you get is akin to pre-UDMA hard drives. The maximum theoretical speed on 16 bit PCMCIA is 33MB/s (the same as ISA) and using PIO (since you don't get DMA using this for IDE) there is only going to be half of that (16.5MB/s) available to transfer data. Without any ram to buffer the IO you are likely going to drop your performance below what the card is even capable of.

      Try your benchmark again with an IDECF adaptor plugged directly into a drive controller (or IDE/Firewire bridge if you are limited to the laptop) and see if it makes a difference. It ought to!

    2. Re:SanDisk ultra II by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      That's weird... I ran the same test with my lexar 8x and it was faster: 8.43 seconds --> 1586 kb/sec = 10.6x Read speed. Slightly faster and about what's expected, but close to the speed of the ultra II.

      I'm pretty sure most PCMCIA CF adaptors are passive and I'm a bit surprised that it's doing PIO. But I'll totally believe it! My card looks like a PCMCIA and not Cardbus, so it's probably 16 bits. Thanks.

      Next step: try out the transfer rates in my camera. The ultra II feels slower there, too, but I'll have to get some hard numbers. My initial tests I did months ago could have been tainted by a Finder problem that chews CPU time in an attempt to make thumbnails when hi-res pictures exist in the directory.

      I'd try your advice, but I don't have that hardware.. I chose the PCMCIA because it's really portable (I mean... it stows inside he computer - how much better can you get than that!)

    3. Re:SanDisk ultra II by GoRK · · Score: 1

      I have no experience with either brand of CF card specifically, so I can't speak to whether or not one card is faster than the other, but regardless, there is a bottleneck in the PCMCIA. Your CF cards might not be coming up against it (yet) but they probably will at some point..

      I have a PC-Card carrier that came with a microdrive that looks to be cardbus (but i haven't ever actually used it, so I dunno) and I have an el-cheapo "Mr. Flash" carrier also. Maybe I should try to do some benchmarks between them with the same CF card(s) and see if it makes any difference (if the microdrive carrier really is cardbus...)

    4. Re:SanDisk ultra II by default+luser · · Score: 1

      The easiest way to find out if your card is Cardbus:

      Every Cardbus card I've ever encountered has a metal strip at the contact end that runs parallel to the edge of the card. It's usually made of gold, and you really can't miss it. I have never seen anything like it on a PCMCIA card.

      Here are a couple pictures if you need a visual cue. Note the large gold strip on the end.

      example 1

      example 2

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

  67. Line in encoding? by SavedLinuXgeeK · · Score: 1

    I was wondering if anyone knew if this model has line in encoding for audio sources. I know the Iriver 3xx, 5xx, and 8xx have the line in encoding, and ogg support, and the 3xx series has linux support with a firm ware upgrade. I am just am considering that a key factor, and this seems tempting, if it was able to procure that feature. Well that and price too. All the iriver series @ 256MB are about $180. Anyone have information on this?

    --
    je suis parce que j'aime
    1. Re:Line in encoding? by Indiges · · Score: 1

      I have a IOPS MFP-312 (seems to be the same device, just another logo) and it has line-in encoding too. Bitrate can be set, the maximum is 192kbps/44KHz (Mp3)

      --


      On the eigth day, god started debugging
  68. when what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The way I see it, no one who ever uses a high capacity digital music player (remember back when we called them MP3 players?)

    my memory is also kind of burnt but i think i remember seeing someone call it that somewhere....

    OH YEAH!, here it is

    Jens Of Sweden MP3 Player With OLED, Ogg
    Posted by timothy on Tuesday May 04, @10:49PM

  69. Please explain by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As someone ignorant about OLED technology ... how exactly are they creating a mirror finish here. Is it dynamic? One minute it's translucent and not mirror-ish, the next minute it's reflective silver colored? I don't get it, and I don't speak "bork bork bork."

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    1. Re:Please explain by John+Starks · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure, but here's my theory. They can make OLED displays that are transparent when switched off, but emit light when on. Perhaps they just put some silvering behind the display, and voila! Instant mirror when the device is off.

    2. Re:Please explain by Bushcat · · Score: 1
      The front panel is plastic with a mirror layer on the back of it, just like the MPIO FL100. The portion over the display is partly transparent. The display simply shines through it. Incidentally, the display is very dim under normal lighting.

      And as has been said elsewhere, Jens don't actually manufacture this: it's a standard OEM'd item also available as IOPS and V@MP, for example.

  70. True, OLED==OEL by kjoonlee · · Score: 4, Informative

    The IEC TC 110 WG/4 recently agreed in April 2004 to call them all OLED now. Here's a news report, in Korean. I can't find any links in English though.

  71. Slashdot.org Advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Want your product to reach a potential audience of tens of thousands?

    Want your advertisement to be cleverly disguised as 'Stuff that matters' when clearly it's just another rippoff of an existing product?

    Contact Slashdot today!

  72. 520mAh vs 2200mAh by zudark · · Score: 2, Informative

    The capacity difference between the two cells is not
    as large as the Amp-hour rating would seem to indicate.
    Li-ion cells operate at about 3.6 volts, while NiMH cells
    operate at about 1.2. Thus, assuming constant voltage
    during discharge and zero internal resistance (incorrect,
    but it makes this easier), you can calculate capacities of:

    1.2V * 2.2Ah = 9.5kJ for the AA cell and
    3.6V * .53Ah = 6.7kJ for the Li-Ion cell.

    Given the higher energy density per mass of Li-Ion
    cells and the form factor flexibility ditching the
    AA provides, this seems like a good tradeoff.

  73. That *is* nice-looking! by Fancia · · Score: 1

    Finally, someone other than Apple has an attractive-looking player. Unfortunately, 512MB flash memory is a bit too little for me... I'd love to see a version of that player with a small hard drive, instead.

    --

    Bít, zabít, jen proto, ze su liska!
  74. Feature or Chrome? by rubberpaw · · Score: 2, Funny

    >>doubles as a mirror.

    Come on, folks. OGG is a nice bell and whistle, but a mirror? That's just chrome. :-)

    1. Re:Feature or Chrome? by John+Starks · · Score: 1

      Huh. I just read those definitions earlier today. That's kind of creepy.

      Unless someone points out that they were linked to in another Slashdot article, of course.

  75. Re:big hands by nxs212 · · Score: 1

    big Swedish hands...better to massage you with!

    What I want to know is WHERE did they take those photos - they look industrial and abandoned!
    Look at the desk - it has paint splattered all over it, the floor is filthy, old furniture.
    Move over WeirdNJ, time for Weird Sweden!

  76. Re:WTF? OGG Support? Why? by ColMustard · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    [not sarcasm]Good question.[/not sarcasm]

    --
    Moof.
  77. jenz of sweden does NOT create mp3players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    note that jenz of sweden does not create any mp3players at all: they just buy mp3players from asia and put the "jenz of sweden" logo on it.

  78. Re:That is one of the sweetest things I've ever se by inflex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is it just me - or does it look like this woman has two left arms? If I'm right, her thumb in the reflection should be on the /other/ side.

  79. iPod has it too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps the Mirror (crystal clear polished metal) on the back of the "large" iPods added to thier succes in the feminie world as well.

  80. Re:That is one of the sweetest things I've ever se by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I'd be scared to meed this clone... seeing as she has two left hands...

  81. Re:That is one of the sweetest things I've ever se by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does one "meed" ??? I'd be scared just meeting her!

  82. cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cool enough mp3 player, but why is it inscribed with "Jews of Sweden"?

  83. Does anyone have news on OLED monitors? by anethema · · Score: 1

    Ive been holding off upgrading my 19 inch CRT hoping someone would come out with an OLED monitor. I'm seeing OLED displays in more and more things, so was hoping they had the blue lifetime thing licked...or at least improved.

    Unfortunatly my CRT is now failing on me. I think it just might be a loose colour wire (monitor changing colours) so I'm going to poke around to check it out--no warnings about high voltages please, I know what I'm doing--. OLED monitors still seem fairly far away dispite some existing prototypes, but I am really hoping they come out soon.

    I want to go flat panel but am very dissatisfied with LCD's economical and technical shortcomings. They have fairly poor contrast, only newly getting the viewing angle thing fixed, have a best possible response time(16ms) thats only barely good enough for a 60fps game (and thats a full on/off transition..transitions to/from partial states take much longer)...and to top it all off are friggin expensive compared to their nicer (bigger) CRT brothers.

    SO, I'm holding out for OLED, but it seems I might be holding out for a few years before seeing a decent sized flat panel display based on this technology.

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    1. Re:Does anyone have news on OLED monitors? by Tin+Foil+Hat · · Score: 1

      Dude, if you're looking for performance, go with a flat screen CRT monitor. ViewSonic is my favorite, but there are several other excellent brands. My PF790 has been going strong for a few years now and doesn't show any sign of giving up. It also supports fast refresh rates at very high resolutions. There are several on the market that have very good performance for only 2 or 3 hundred bucks.

      LCDs are nice and are very easy on the eyes, but they are simply not comparable to a really good CRT for sheer performance.

      --
      No matter how many of my rights are taken away, somehow I still don't feel safe. -Frigid Monkey
    2. Re:Does anyone have news on OLED monitors? by anethema · · Score: 1

      I know they dont compare, the point is, I want something smaller than CRT. I Dont give a rat's ass about the flatness, I want an actuall thin screen flat monitor. Like LCD with without all LCD's shittyness.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  84. c'mon people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jriver had cooler shit than that years ago

    this is for frugal geek cokeheads.
    I mean... a mirror?

    I'll show you MY USB stick.

  85. Re:That is one of the sweetest things I've ever se by Nibbler(C) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm fairly certain it's the photographer's hand that is holding the player. It's easier to get a good shot when you can shift the mirror with your own hands. And besides, otherwise she'd have two left hands.

  86. Re:You are almost certainly right by CyberDruid · · Score: 3, Informative

    Jens of Sweden has never developed any technology of it's own. Their game is to rebrand other manufacturers mp3-players and make the exterior look somewhat better. I don't have the energy to find a link, but this is common knowledge.

    --

    Opinions stated are mine and do not reflect those of the Illuminati

  87. Slashdot vs. marketing by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

    Although WE'D all hate it, marketing the player based on "Play time" would be an advantage that might help Ogg Vorbis gain market share.

    --

    "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  88. For you who don't know of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  89. Rebranded crap. by nordicfrost · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why is it that the "design labels" of our days have the need for rebranding of far eastern goods? As someone already pointed out in this tread, this is a rebranded Iops player.

    I remember Bang & Olufsen when they launched their failed cellphone series. It was just a rebranded Ericsson phone, in three more colors at twice the price. My guess is that todays consumers are too vary of these things and JoS will fail unless they cooperate and innovate like certain other companies.

    The absolutely worst case of rebranding ever was the North Korean government: They bought / stole severeal Huyndai cars and rebranded them (illegaly) as their own brand. Everybody outside NK understood what was going on, but this was a publicity stunt for their own people to convince them that NK had an up to date booming car industry.

    1. Re:Rebranded crap. by B2382F29 · · Score: 1

      and rebranded them (illegaly)

      Are you sure that rebranding cars is illegal in North Korea? Because if not, then there is nothing illegal about it. (Despite various attempts of US Government to extend US law to other countries)

      --
      Move Sig. For great justice.
    2. Re:Rebranded crap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first JoS models were just rebranded.
      The new models have been developed by JoS and then manufactured by IOPS.

    3. Re:Rebranded crap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow I doubt this. Do you have any more details?

    4. Re:Rebranded crap. by nordicfrost · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about this. Let us have a look at Sony Ericsson. Them design (mostly) their own phones in house and set the production away to Flextronics, practically outsourcing the production. But under no circumstances are Flextronics allowed to even hint that the phones they build from components are Flextronics brand phones. But maybe JoS has a special deal with IOPS.

      As for North Korea; true, they aren't exactly members of WIPO... :D But then again, that means you can rip as many military chorus CDs as you evercould want to...

  90. FM transmitter? by rbb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I bought their MP300 a couple of weeks ago and I absolutely love it.

    One thing that isn't mentioned on the MP300 page (since usage is illegal in Scandinavia), is that the player includes an FM transmitter that can be enabled by running a small program.

    Does the MP130 have this functionality as well?

    --
    In God We Trust, Others We Monitor
  91. I think we're missing the real threat here... by Genda · · Score: 1

    FLASH!!!

    Man self imollates while accidentally trying to listen to his cigarette lighter!!!!

    Genda
    -- I'm wainting for someone to build a personal nuke with the same form factor...

  92. Looks Like The Muzio - OLED Is Rubbish! by Jakeg · · Score: 2, Informative

    This player is extremley similar to my Muzio (www.muzio.co.kr) player, which also has an OLED display (in fact, Jens one looks like the same one running on slightly updated software). Same button combination too. The Muzio is great - 512MB memory, line-in, direct MP3 encoding, FM radio, voice recording. BUT big drawback - the OLED display is shockingly bad. You can hardly see it at all, when at full brightness, in bright sunlight. Very annoying. Apart from this, I'd recommend the Muzio, but the Jen looks more stylish... and you get a free mirror!!!

    1. Re:Looks Like The Muzio - OLED Is Rubbish! by oneiron · · Score: 2, Informative

      My experience with OLED is exactly opposite. I have a phone (LG VX6000) with an external OLED display, and it is brighter and more readable than any other type of display I have yet seen in any light.

  93. Wouldn't help anyone by Arker · · Score: 1

    If they did this, figuring it at 64kbs, next week the competition would be advertising playing time with 64kbs mp3 to match them. Then the next week someone would go to 48kbs, and a week later everyone would follow them...

    It wouldn't help anyone, and it will probably happen, without Ogg being involved even. That's what marketing droids do. :(

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  94. Re:That is one of the sweetest things I've ever se by Seehund · · Score: 1

    I think it's even more scary that one of her hands (the one holding the player, we can't be sure of just how many hands this creature has) is a man's hand!

    --
    Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
  95. Re:That is one of the sweetest things I've ever se by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I haven't seen any practical OLED apps

    Yes, the problem with OLEDs is that they still have a very limited live time. There is a car radio (I belief it was only put to the japanese markets) that had such a nice display. But after as short as a year it begun to have the first visible defects. Once they've started to decease they are soon not usable any more.

    The problem has to do with the fact, that smallest amounts of h2o destroy the stuctures of the OLEDs. Smallest amounts means the order of magnitude of few molecules. Yet there is no efficient way to build the display so that they are totally sealed from water. I'm not starting to talk about that there is not a really cheap way to achieve that in sight.

    Even if this MP3-player looks really nice to me (ogg!) I would not invest my money in a product that is going to be broken not later that in two years or so.

  96. Re:That is one of the sweetest things I've ever se by gsyswerda · · Score: 1
    Fingerprints are formed during fetal developement and are not determined entirely by DNA

    Is that really true? If that's the case, how can an injured finger know how to grow the same pattern back?

    --
    Make a difference: move to a swing state.
  97. Re:You are almost certainly right by ]ix[ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, they often develop the specs themself and let the koreans develop the tech.

    Jens of sweden is a company that brings cool korean gadgets to europe. But not any cool gadget, only those up to their specs. If nothing fits the koreans adapt their products. Capitalism in a nutshell.

    I have a link but its in swedish so its of no use anyway.

    --
    This is my sig, show me yours
  98. Re:big hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and whats your point?

    new above old will always make you notice the new, look at manequins clothes, they go with the device, not the environment

  99. parents link probably NSFW by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 0

    looked like the portal to some gay porn site

    --
    TIAEAE!
    1. Re:parents link probably NSFW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a reason...

  100. More specs from press release by viktor · · Score: 2, Informative

    Specs from the press release (which is only available in nordic languages it seems):

    • File formats: MP3, WMA, ASF, OGG
    • Built in FM radio
    • Entirely graphical 96x64mm OLED screen in red and orange
    • Alarm
    • Clock
    • Customers can import jpeg:s and create their own screen savers
    • 18 hours play time minimum
    • Foldable USB port
    • 13 + 13 mW output
    • SRS, TRUBASS and other sound enhancing effects
    • Line in which records to WMA or MP3
    • Size 79.5 x 31.0 x 14.8mm, weight 43g.
    • 128, 256 and 512 MB models

    The recommended prices are SEK 1795/2495/3295, which translates to very roughly $240/$330/$430.

  101. Of course different by DrYak · · Score: 1

    This HAS to be a different person.

    She cannot see herself a the same time AND take a picture of herself, because the mirror has to point to a different direction each time (to see herself : point directly at her. to take a picture : point in the middle between her face and the camera).

    So, some else has to do the shot and the correct camera/mirror orientation.
    The girl herself only sees the camera in the mirror. Not herself.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  102. Re:That is one of the sweetest things I've ever se by FeebleX · · Score: 1

    Actually the Fujitsu F504i mobile phone from NTT DoCoMo already had an OLED display 2 years ago.

    http://k-tai.impress.co.jp/cda/article/showcase_to p/9536.html

  103. Do you trust Swedes? :) by kjoonlee · · Score: 1

    If you read the original link, it says:

    System requirements
    • Windows 98-SE/ME/2000/XP
    • Mac OS 8.6 or newer (Linux as well)
    • USB port
    • 32 MB RAM
  104. Availability of chips by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    Units like this don't generally use a general purpose CPU running the decoder algorithms in software - they have a very small, low-power microcontroller controlling a dedicated decoder chip, which is a DSP with a mask-ROM version of the MP3 algorithm on it.

    You cannot simply update a mask-ROM device (unless you are E.T.) - the data is encoded as the presense or absense of metal at a junction of the chip, not charge on a floating gate of a transistor (as in EEPROM/Flash).

    Now, if the makers of such decoder chips start shipping chips with the Vorbis algorithm on them, then we might start seeing more small devices like this.

    However, IIRC Fraunhoffer has stated that they believe Vorbis infringes on their patents, therefore it is unlikely that they would license the MP3 algorithm to anybody who plans to put it on the same device as Vorbis.

    I'd be interested to see how this device solves the problem - are they using a non-mask-ROM DSP, and loading it from an external ROM, or has some company started shipping combination MP3/Vorbis decoders? Or did they just use an embedded device with enough beef to run MP3 and Vorbis directly?

    1. Re:Availability of chips by tuffy · · Score: 1
      However, IIRC Fraunhoffer has stated that they believe Vorbis infringes on their patents, therefore it is unlikely that they would license the MP3 algorithm to anybody who plans to put it on the same device as Vorbis.

      Fraunhofer already licensed mp3 decoders for Neuros, Rio and iRiver products that have (or may have) vorbis decoders. I surmise either Fraunhofer's patents don't cover vorbis, or Fraunhofer doesn't care about vorbis. Without more specific knowledge of the patents, it's difficult to guess which.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

  105. I see... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a clown with crosses for eyes that smells of kimche

  106. MPIO FL-100 Has A Mirror by N8F8 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The MPIO FL-100 already havea mirrored surface. You can also but the FL-100 at your favorite retail outlet. No USB port though. But it does have some Linux support

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  107. Jens of Sweden MP-300 is made by Korean Nextway by i4u · · Score: 3, Informative
  108. TFT Monitors by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

    Well hi, welcome to 2004.

    If you do decide to get a new monitor, you might want to check out the Iiyama E431S. 17" 1280x768 display, 16ms response time, and no visible ghosting that I've seen. And I play plenty of games, and watch DVD movies.

    The thing has digital and analog inputs (not supplied with a DVI cable, though), which is good, and overall is an extremely nice piece of hardware. Better than a lot of competitors, and not the most expensive, either.

    1. Re:TFT Monitors by anethema · · Score: 1

      I think its cute that you've 'gotten used' to the problems with the monitor, but you say yourself it has 16ms response time. DVD movies are 24fps, or 30fps, depending, but play a game that goes over 60fps, and you WILL see frame-smearing. Invert 16ms and tell me what number that gives you..16ms means it can update 60ish times a second and thats just how it is. I dont wanna have to 'get used to' only every beeing allowed 60 frames a second, I dont care if its

      I look up the contrast ratio and it's a piss poor 450:1. Not bad FOR LCD, but still horrible compared to CRT. 450:1 means black will be a dark grey. Maybe you now associate that with black on a monitor, but look at a nice CRT and you will see the difference.

      Either way, I'm dyin for OLED :) Has all those problems licked.

      Less power consumption than backlit LCD, no viewing angle problems, excellent contrast, excellent respons times (in the microseconds)..etc
      The only problem they dont have licked yet is the lifetime of the blue colour is less than red/green. They have red/green past 20000 hours, but blue is still just under 10000. So it will shift towards yellow at the end of the blue lifetime.

      Oh well, more waiting :)

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    2. Re:TFT Monitors by anethema · · Score: 1

      "only every beeing allowed 60 frames a second, I dont care if its"

      Sorry meant to say i dont care if its 'smooth enuf', i dont wanna have to settle.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  109. Re:That is one of the sweetest things I've ever se by mrwonton · · Score: 1
    Or, more simply put, tequila and slashdot do not mix.



    Wait, so does that mean slashdot is oil based?!

    --
    Not more than you need, just more than you want
  110. Re:That is one of the sweetest things I've ever se by trentblase · · Score: 1

    It doesn't... it almost sounds like you've never gotten your fingertips shaved before!

  111. Re:That is one of the sweetest things I've ever se by Xofer+D · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Is it just me - or does it look like this woman has two left arms? If I'm right, her thumb in the reflection should be on the /other/ side.
    Naw, her hand is just turned so the palm is facing towards the mirror (away from her face). Otherwise, you'd see the rest of her fingers where in this photo you only see one finger. Also note the other finger just visible above the thumb.
    --
    The Signal/Noise ratio can be improved in two ways. Remaining silent is the OTHER way.
  112. more players need aac support by cecirdr · · Score: 1
    I agree. I've bought too many aac files to want to burn them all off to cd to convert them to mp3s. I'd love to get an iriver ihp140 to replace my first generation ipod, but...no aac support.

    Apple must really be holding the aac info close. Then again..if apple finally releases an ipod with better a better s/n ratio and true playlist creation from the player...I'd be happy to buy one of those instead of the iriver or zen xtra.

    Still...I wish Apple would find a way to make some money from selling music and not just ipods. That way more players would be able to play aac files and use iTunes to sync. Hell, I'd pay for iTunes, if it'd let me use any digital player on the market.

  113. Re:You are almost certainly right by ShawnDoc · · Score: 1

    Just like Linksys! Only they use Taiwanese companies to develope the tech, not Korean.

  114. only in au by Mr+44 · · Score: 1

    They don't ship internationally, according to their faq.

  115. Cool but.. by Control-Z · · Score: 1

    It's a nice looking unit but any of those 256MB or 512MB players are just a toy compared to the gigabytes and thousands of songs you can put on a hard drive based player.

    Sure hard drives can fail but I've had a normal 3.5 inch 40GB WD hard drive in my Dension DMP3 car player for 2 years now. It's gone through a full range of winter and summer weather and ~30 miles of daily driving, and it's still going strong. Even if it failed today I'd rather buy a $40 hard drive every few years rather than get by with ~64 songs on a solid-state player.

  116. OGG doesn't sound any better than WMA9 or AAC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So companies don't need to use OGG to advertise "more music in less space".

  117. MWUAHAHAHAAHAHAHA!! by amix · · Score: 1

    Check out this: http://www.jensofsweden.com/media/MP-130/mp-130_3_ web.jpg

    Then look at the hand of the "woman" sticking her lip.

    --
    Hello?? Fred?! Is this you?
  118. Another one to add by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Cool, so I can add this to my list of ogg-enabled personal music boxes.
    Here's the list at the moment:

    Rio Karma
    Sharp Zaurus
    Sony Ericsson P800
    Neuros
    Palm Tungsten
    Frontier Labs NEXiA (via a promised firmware update)
    iRiver iMP-250/350/400/550, iFP-1000("Prism Eye"), iFP-700/800
    IOPS MFP-312/315/350
    Jens of Sweden MP-130 (128,256 or 512MB) (rebadged IOPS?)

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  119. ISM Technologies by dolmen.fr · · Score: 1

    In France, the device seems to be distributed by ISM Technologies under the name ISM IOPS 512.