Well most likely said immigrant was required to do the WORK for the patent, whether or not he was crucial to the viability of it. That's a double edged sword, without them it wouldn't have happened (or as many wouldn't have happened), but by using them we are training them to be innovators. They very shortly WILL be the key innovators, whether or not thye are now.
Or, more likely, he was hired to get grant money by fulfilling the "diversity" requirement of said grants.
Apparently Utah has passed a law that prohibits anyone making laws that restrict firearms. So no charges can be brought against anyone who starts a fire while shooting on public lands. At a guess you'be absolved from blame for shooting those pesky liberals, like Orin Hatch.
This is called "preemption", and quite a few states have laws like that.
If they didn't have them, local fiefdoms of arbitrary and capricious laws designed to bilk fine money out of outsiders would rule the day.
Local governments abused the power they had, and it had to be taken away. Nothing to see here, they deserved it, and created the situation themselves.
It will very likely not be a cyber attack, they aren't well equipped for that. More than likely, it'll be a Photoshop attack, which we know they are good at.
Some departments allow police to be uniformed, off duty, and getting paid to do private security in their spare time. Likewise, some municipalities allow events to pay them to have officers loiter there. So it wasn't necessarily tax dollars.
What do you expect for a bunch of Asperger's spectrum disorder dingleberries that have trouble telling the difference between people with minds and feelings and a real-doll. This type of mistake, understanding intent is part of the definition of the thing!
The problem is, if you keep getting in gunfights due to your actions, eventually you get hit and incapacitated and caught, or just killed.
So that's a self-correcting strategy that only works for a little bit.
And your argument is that it's "mentally hard to kill someone" only applies to a decent citizen. Go Google the essay "Street Robberies and You" (it's all over the place now). There's no reason for a homeowner to not assume the person is there to kill them. (At least, a smart homeowner should assume that.) Which negates your argument.
Feel free to decide what to do yourself. However, your right to tell me what to do stops at the edges of my property.
Again, your reading comprehension is lacking. Decoys of warheads are for the re-entry phase. Decoys of complete rockets would be required, that's not a simple engineering problem, unless your decoys never leave the pad and are there to attract Tomahawks.
The drones are not just tracking during the boost phase, they are killing the target during the boost phase. Which is nice, because it falls right back down near or on the folks that launched it. Your bloviating about other stages of flight are meaningless because you clearly did not understand what the discussion is about.
Anyway, a boost-phase intercept is tricky because of the need to get the intercept vehicle there fast. That problem could be solved with a beam-weapon or by moving the intercept vehicle to a stand-off position much closer to the launch point. Thus, the drone equipped with it.
I have the feeling the 747 you think you know about is only the tip of the iceberg, it isn't used anymore because as a proof of concept, it worked poorly. However, it worked. The rest is engineering.
Aside from this being a colossally stupid question, yes.
The US populace has more than enough firepower to take on the Army. There would be huge losses, however a asymmetrical war would ultimately defeat the armed forces.
First off, the people that make up the armed forces are all individuals, that all took an oath and believe in the Constitution. For a civi vs army fight to be occurring, the Constitution has been severely breached. You'll find the Army folks leading the civilian folks against the remaining government.
Secondly, the supply chain of the armed forces relies heavily on civilian businesses and contractors. Lose those, and you lose the ability to fight.
The question is ridiculous. Wars are not fought by firepower alone to the point that a.32 caliber pistol in the hands of 100's of people you can't identify until they actually shoot you completely negates all the aircraft carriers in the world.
"There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery, then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved." Jesse Jackson
The most dangerous thing to a young black male, is another black male. Until that changes, maybe shut the fuck up about what white people do to them. They made this pile of shit themselves. African Americans, can, and do, regularly climb out of the cycle and become productive citizens. For some reason, many have _chosen_ not to. A man bent on destroying himself will often succeed.
You are a fool if you think the M.A.D. doctrine won't be used somewhere, somehow again. Or, if you think the US isn't going to be on one side of it. A weapon you'll never used still has to work. Any opponent savvy enough to need MAD used against them, is also savvy enough to figure out if our weapons work or not.
There was not enough evidence to even arrest Martin for the burglary tools thing(aside from the video of him tagging the school), so he wasn't, let alone go to trial. Sorta like, Zimmerman doesn't have enough evidence against HIM to go to trial.
Anyway, the jewelry probably wasn't identified because it didn't come from the Miami area (where he was caught with it) but rather his dad's girlfriend's area, Sanford. The point is moot, but there may be a lot more to the belief that Martin looked suspicious like he was casing houses because he WAS casing houses.
There is enough info out there to know what path Martin was on in life. He just didn't get a chance to develop fully into a thug with assaults, rapes, robberies and so on. He rolled his dice and lost the first time.
You forgot about the Florida law that specifically prohibits an arrest of a self defense claimant unless they have good reason. Zimmerman was arrested and stuck around and talked to police of his own free will, without a lawyer. The police cobbled together what they could and offered up a charge on the original police report, and once the chief saw it and the first DA saw it the whole thing was dumped because it was a non-existent case that didn't in any way satisfy the rules of Florida law.
Martin was dead at 7:12 PM or so. The only basketball game on that night was an All Star game, that started at 7:30 PM. This is proof, that there are a lot of lies floating around.
Google "Street Robberies and You" and come back and re think your position on this.
You are mis-stating an important point about carrying a gun.
The intent is that if you draw, you need to have the resolve and guts to be able to shoot (or you just gave a gun to an attacker who will take it from you)
It is NOT that you have to fire if you pull the gun out. Think about it for a second, cops draw their guns all the time. What for? Well, the same reasons a non-cop might draw their gun and not fire (minus the arrest someone part).
Anyway, aren't you the faggot making up stuff about Zimmerman upthread? I bet you have never even touched a gun in your life.
You are a damn fool. Nobody is going to call 911 (and not know when the cops will appear around the corner) and then try to self-mutilate.
Are you a doctor, what the fuck do you know about broken noses?
Marin was using a burner phone. He switched phones frequently to keep from getting caught selling drugs. (There are screen shots of Facebook conversations about selling drugs.)
Martin's dad didn't know he was gone all night. The kid was in town to be "straightned out" and his dad leaves him alone in the house to go party. Then his dad comes home (drunk or high probably) and doesn't get too worried about his son, while failing to notice dozens of police vehicles in the neighborhood. In the morning, the dad calls Saint Tray Tray the Angelic's latest burner phone and gets nothing. Then calls the jails and hospitals thinking Tray Tray got arrested again, tries to fill out a missing persons report and the cops say "ok we'll come by" knowing the kid is dead and tell him then.
There was no "not identifying for three days". It was the NEXT day.
Slashdot Mirror
Well most likely said immigrant was required to do the WORK for the patent, whether or not he was crucial to the viability of it. That's a double edged sword, without them it wouldn't have happened (or as many wouldn't have happened), but by using them we are training them to be innovators. They very shortly WILL be the key innovators, whether or not thye are now.
Or, more likely, he was hired to get grant money by fulfilling the "diversity" requirement of said grants.
TFA is nothing but speculation, and quotes from folks that have bones to pick or are outright, simply known liars. (Iran)
This submission, and green-lighting is more whitewash like we had here last week.
Move along, nothing to see.
Apparently Utah has passed a law that prohibits anyone making laws that restrict firearms. So no charges can be brought against anyone who starts a fire while shooting on public lands. At a guess you'be absolved from blame for shooting those pesky liberals, like Orin Hatch.
This is called "preemption", and quite a few states have laws like that.
If they didn't have them, local fiefdoms of arbitrary and capricious laws designed to bilk fine money out of outsiders would rule the day.
Local governments abused the power they had, and it had to be taken away. Nothing to see here, they deserved it, and created the situation themselves.
It will very likely not be a cyber attack, they aren't well equipped for that. More than likely, it'll be a Photoshop attack, which we know they are good at.
You forgot "with a bad heart". I call that the "Dan Quayle Effect". Living, breathing, proof that it could be much much worse.
No kidding. The 20 year old is likely to be able to aim better.
Some departments allow police to be uniformed, off duty, and getting paid to do private security in their spare time. Likewise, some municipalities allow events to pay them to have officers loiter there. So it wasn't necessarily tax dollars.
What do you expect for a bunch of Asperger's spectrum disorder dingleberries that have trouble telling the difference between people with minds and feelings and a real-doll. This type of mistake, understanding intent is part of the definition of the thing!
They may "win" the first few times.
The problem is, if you keep getting in gunfights due to your actions, eventually you get hit and incapacitated and caught, or just killed.
So that's a self-correcting strategy that only works for a little bit.
And your argument is that it's "mentally hard to kill someone" only applies to a decent citizen. Go Google the essay "Street Robberies and You" (it's all over the place now). There's no reason for a homeowner to not assume the person is there to kill them. (At least, a smart homeowner should assume that.) Which negates your argument.
Feel free to decide what to do yourself. However, your right to tell me what to do stops at the edges of my property.
[Citation Needed]
My theory is you are getting to be more of a panty-waste pussy as you get older.
Which is as good as yours without a citation.
Again, your reading comprehension is lacking. Decoys of warheads are for the re-entry phase. Decoys of complete rockets would be required, that's not a simple engineering problem, unless your decoys never leave the pad and are there to attract Tomahawks.
The drones are not just tracking during the boost phase, they are killing the target during the boost phase. Which is nice, because it falls right back down near or on the folks that launched it. Your bloviating about other stages of flight are meaningless because you clearly did not understand what the discussion is about.
Anyway, a boost-phase intercept is tricky because of the need to get the intercept vehicle there fast. That problem could be solved with a beam-weapon or by moving the intercept vehicle to a stand-off position much closer to the launch point. Thus, the drone equipped with it.
I have the feeling the 747 you think you know about is only the tip of the iceberg, it isn't used anymore because as a proof of concept, it worked poorly. However, it worked. The rest is engineering.
Taxpayer dollars. What the fuck are you talking about?
Oh, wait, you worked for AT&T. You be stupid. The smart ones went to Lucent.
Aside from this being a colossally stupid question, yes.
The US populace has more than enough firepower to take on the Army. There would be huge losses, however a asymmetrical war would ultimately defeat the armed forces.
First off, the people that make up the armed forces are all individuals, that all took an oath and believe in the Constitution. For a civi vs army fight to be occurring, the Constitution has been severely breached. You'll find the Army folks leading the civilian folks against the remaining government.
Secondly, the supply chain of the armed forces relies heavily on civilian businesses and contractors. Lose those, and you lose the ability to fight.
The question is ridiculous. Wars are not fought by firepower alone to the point that a .32 caliber pistol in the hands of 100's of people you can't identify until they actually shoot you completely negates all the aircraft carriers in the world.
It just means they know they are talking to a knee-jerk retard that likes to make a fuss without thinking about what was said first.
If you hear it a lot, it's you that's the problem.
"There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery, then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved." Jesse Jackson
http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1346&dat=19931201&id=rZgsAAAAIBAJ&sjid=cfwDAAAAIBAJ&pg=5089,44540
The most dangerous thing to a young black male, is another black male. Until that changes, maybe shut the fuck up about what white people do to them. They made this pile of shit themselves. African Americans, can, and do, regularly climb out of the cycle and become productive citizens. For some reason, many have _chosen_ not to. A man bent on destroying himself will often succeed.
You are a fool if you think the M.A.D. doctrine won't be used somewhere, somehow again. Or, if you think the US isn't going to be on one side of it. A weapon you'll never used still has to work. Any opponent savvy enough to need MAD used against them, is also savvy enough to figure out if our weapons work or not.
There was not enough evidence to even arrest Martin for the burglary tools thing(aside from the video of him tagging the school), so he wasn't, let alone go to trial. Sorta like, Zimmerman doesn't have enough evidence against HIM to go to trial.
Anyway, the jewelry probably wasn't identified because it didn't come from the Miami area (where he was caught with it) but rather his dad's girlfriend's area, Sanford. The point is moot, but there may be a lot more to the belief that Martin looked suspicious like he was casing houses because he WAS casing houses.
There is enough info out there to know what path Martin was on in life. He just didn't get a chance to develop fully into a thug with assaults, rapes, robberies and so on. He rolled his dice and lost the first time.
Why do you anonymous shitbirds always leave out the part about the towering thugged out gangster wanna be beating the guy who shot him?
You forgot about the Florida law that specifically prohibits an arrest of a self defense claimant unless they have good reason. Zimmerman was arrested and stuck around and talked to police of his own free will, without a lawyer. The police cobbled together what they could and offered up a charge on the original police report, and once the chief saw it and the first DA saw it the whole thing was dumped because it was a non-existent case that didn't in any way satisfy the rules of Florida law.
Martin was dead at 7:12 PM or so. The only basketball game on that night was an All Star game, that started at 7:30 PM. This is proof, that there are a lot of lies floating around.
Google "Street Robberies and You" and come back and re think your position on this.
You are mis-stating an important point about carrying a gun.
The intent is that if you draw, you need to have the resolve and guts to be able to shoot (or you just gave a gun to an attacker who will take it from you)
It is NOT that you have to fire if you pull the gun out. Think about it for a second, cops draw their guns all the time. What for? Well, the same reasons a non-cop might draw their gun and not fire (minus the arrest someone part).
Anyway, aren't you the faggot making up stuff about Zimmerman upthread? I bet you have never even touched a gun in your life.
At the rate he was racking up disciplinary actions at school, he was unlikely to be a high school student throughout the remainder of his Junior year.
Aggravated assault and battery.
You are a damn fool. Nobody is going to call 911 (and not know when the cops will appear around the corner) and then try to self-mutilate.
Are you a doctor, what the fuck do you know about broken noses?
Marin was using a burner phone. He switched phones frequently to keep from getting caught selling drugs. (There are screen shots of Facebook conversations about selling drugs.)
Martin's dad didn't know he was gone all night. The kid was in town to be "straightned out" and his dad leaves him alone in the house to go party. Then his dad comes home (drunk or high probably) and doesn't get too worried about his son, while failing to notice dozens of police vehicles in the neighborhood. In the morning, the dad calls Saint Tray Tray the Angelic's latest burner phone and gets nothing. Then calls the jails and hospitals thinking Tray Tray got arrested again, tries to fill out a missing persons report and the cops say "ok we'll come by" knowing the kid is dead and tell him then.
There was no "not identifying for three days". It was the NEXT day.
You, are a missinformed liar.