It definitely happens but it's in small enough quantity that I think it's being done with targeted compromises of servers involved with domain lookups at hosting services and the like. Either that or someone is selling the lookup data.
I've never worked on such systems, but I bet you could have a human identify a target at some distance, say "kill" and then the machine is much better at tracking and shooting it. IOW, don't assume the human element has been removed.
I specifically asked them not to cut the copper and they didn't. Insisting that they have to move the POTS to fiber seems not-unreasonable to me; sure it's a big profit item for them, but I can see them wanting to move away from providing copper service.
After my father's hear surgery many years ago he was intubated and couldn't communicate. I quickly drew up a chart of all the letters, numerals and "YES" and "NO". He spelled out "SEDATIVE".
People were impressed with it, but it's bloody obvious.
This is why the canard works: because most people don't get a really obvious point.
Goodmail does nothing to prevent spam from getting on your system. All it does is to ensure that legitimate mail is not stopped mistakenly by anti-spam filters.
Isn't that clear? Why is this hard for some folks?
It's an old canard against Goodmail to claim it's an anti-spam system and then comdemn it as an ineffective solution. It's not supposed to be an anti-spam system. It's a system for legitimate senders to avoid false positives.
It's not just a matter of ponying up the money to them. You have to demonstrate that you are a legitimate business and a legitimate e-mail source, and not a significant source of complaints by users.
Read the news article just above you dipshit. He had seizures. But even if he didn't he might have had a heart attack or some other diabling condition with sudden onset. You going to blame him for that?
Range isn't the only reason, but it's a good one. If you read the terms for the Philadelphia network, for example, they are specific that it may not work with interior rooms.
Someone else mentioned IIS and I thought it was worth mentioning, appropos of parent's remarks, that it's been years since the last really serious IIS vulnerability. In the last two years or so it actually has a better security record than Apache, especially Apache with PHP installed (Apache of course has a really good security record too, but IIS has been stellar).
Look at Secunia's page on IIS 6.0, which is 3 or 4 years old: 3 vulnerabilities total, all patched and none of them seriously critical.
That would be great for Mac users, but not so good for Apple. Remember one of the first things Steve Jobs did when he came back was to stop allowing 3rd parties to build Mac-compatible systems. He wants to control the hardware sale as well as the software.
I've met several relatively senior Microsoft personnel who love their Acer Ferraris. I was recently shopping for a high-end notebook on which to run Vista with XP in a child VM and asked several people at Microsoft. Some recommended the Acer, but I'm a Thinkpad bigot and got a duded-up Z61p.
I write about their products all the time and they're always trying to influence me, but nobody's ever offered me anything like a notebook.
Slashdot Mirror
I found a buffer overflow. Exploit code to follow...
This is old news. I wrote about it last July for eWEEK.
It definitely happens but it's in small enough quantity that I think it's being done with targeted compromises of servers involved with domain lookups at hosting services and the like. Either that or someone is selling the lookup data.
I've never worked on such systems, but I bet you could have a human identify a target at some distance, say "kill" and then the machine is much better at tracking and shooting it. IOW, don't assume the human element has been removed.
Everyone who buys an iPhone knows about these rules. You don't like them, don't buy an iPhone. It's not like it's an actual necessity of life.
See this NYT article on both services
I specifically asked them not to cut the copper and they didn't. Insisting that they have to move the POTS to fiber seems not-unreasonable to me; sure it's a big profit item for them, but I can see them wanting to move away from providing copper service.
Yes, exactly. It's perfect! And when he's unconscious we can get what he's thinking from it.
After my father's hear surgery many years ago he was intubated and couldn't communicate. I quickly drew up a chart of all the letters, numerals and "YES" and "NO". He spelled out "SEDATIVE".
People were impressed with it, but it's bloody obvious.
I think the delay is more likely attributable to them putting less-severe bug fixes on a longer and more rigorous test cycle.
This is why the canard works: because most people don't get a really obvious point.
Goodmail does nothing to prevent spam from getting on your system. All it does is to ensure that legitimate mail is not stopped mistakenly by anti-spam filters.
Isn't that clear? Why is this hard for some folks?
It's an old canard against Goodmail to claim it's an anti-spam system and then comdemn it as an ineffective solution. It's not supposed to be an anti-spam system. It's a system for legitimate senders to avoid false positives.
It's not just a matter of ponying up the money to them. You have to demonstrate that you are a legitimate business and a legitimate e-mail source, and not a significant source of complaints by users.
Read the news article just above you dipshit. He had seizures. But even if he didn't he might have had a heart attack or some other diabling condition with sudden onset. You going to blame him for that?
Range isn't the only reason, but it's a good one. If you read the terms for the Philadelphia network, for example, they are specific that it may not work with interior rooms.
>>How many more small businesses would buy a server if they could actually get the pipe to host their own apps?
Very few of them should. They should be outsourcing such things, no matter how cheap bandwidth is.
That was one hell of a graduation speech he gave a few years back.
Someone else mentioned IIS and I thought it was worth mentioning, appropos of parent's remarks, that it's been years since the last really serious IIS vulnerability. In the last two years or so it actually has a better security record than Apache, especially Apache with PHP installed (Apache of course has a really good security record too, but IIS has been stellar).
Look at Secunia's page on IIS 6.0, which is 3 or 4 years old: 3 vulnerabilities total, all patched and none of them seriously critical.
'Groovy' is a 60's word. By the 70's it was only used in Archie comics
I'd say vegetarianism and fascism are less directly related than communism and property rights issues.
Watta buncha hypocrites.
Can Adobe open up the spec like this and still threaten Microsoft legally for including a reader in Office 2007?
A: Of course they can, the whole thing was hypocritical to begin with.
That would be great for Mac users, but not so good for Apple. Remember one of the first things Steve Jobs did when he came back was to stop allowing 3rd parties to build Mac-compatible systems. He wants to control the hardware sale as well as the software.
I've met several relatively senior Microsoft personnel who love their Acer Ferraris. I was recently shopping for a high-end notebook on which to run Vista with XP in a child VM and asked several people at Microsoft. Some recommended the Acer, but I'm a Thinkpad bigot and got a duded-up Z61p.
I write about their products all the time and they're always trying to influence me, but nobody's ever offered me anything like a notebook.
Yeah, like this has never happened before. How many people lived on Atlantis?
Like Outlook rules.
You may all now tell me why Outlook rules suck.