Please read about the differences between architecture and microarchitecture. RISC is part of the (instruction set) architecture and out-of-order execution etc. are part of the microarchitecture.
"I have worked with enough * to know that they are incapable of saying "hey I might be wrong." If you talk to just about any *, you'll hear that * is the best place on Earth and that * shit doesn't stink. It's impossible for * to be wrong because everything * is the best in the whole world."
Replace * with just about every place in the world, USA, Germany, France, Russia, Australia, (...). Well not Sweden, a bunch of anti-nationalistic complainers.
So how many people here don't understand the difference between government activities and activities of private companies? And for those (hopefully very few) that really don't understand this - why do you think these are in the linked article:
"... FBI’s remarkable attempt to force Google..." "The court warrants..."
Templates are fine (for some definition of fine) for static type systems where types can be decided and code specialized at compile time. Julia is however dynamic and uses different mechanism.
First this chip was designed at Centaur Technology in the US, a subsidiary of the main VIA. They design x86 processors, don't blame other crap on them. Second this isn't a problem with the chip - it's a problem in software not configuring the chip correctly according to the documentation.
Third their x86 processors were designed for a specific market for which they are/were a good fit.
Lot of work to find something (partially) documented. Sandpile lists the instruction as ALTINST, the code is documented by VIA as used for testing with an MSR (Machine Specific Register) bit to enable it. If not enabled I assume it would be treated as an illegal instruction.
That some machine with a C3 processor didn't set the correct machine configuration is bad but not the end of the world - just set it correctly in the OS instead.
Citation needed. Actually it's not needed as your "none" makes the statement false, more than one farmer have been proven to deliberately plant seeds protected by a Monsanto patent without the right to do so.
You or another AC have already posted this "argument", doing it repeatedly is spamming/fishing for responses. Your argument is idiotic, that's why you don't get the responses you want. So please stop.
Slashdot Mirror
Please read about the differences between architecture and microarchitecture. RISC is part of the (instruction set) architecture and out-of-order execution etc. are part of the microarchitecture.
And I never understood why it's called KDE! I mean the people that uses them aren't K's, okay?
Save your trolling for something that matters...
"I have worked with enough * to know that they are incapable of saying "hey I might be wrong." If you talk to just about any *, you'll hear that * is the best place on Earth and that * shit doesn't stink. It's impossible for * to be wrong because everything * is the best in the whole world."
Replace * with just about every place in the world, USA, Germany, France, Russia, Australia, (...). Well not Sweden, a bunch of anti-nationalistic complainers.
No.
That's the reason the Fahrenheit scale doesn't fail 100% - it's correct at one point.
~35? Ones or twos complement? Word size?
String theory, theories to be correct.
So how many people here don't understand the difference between government activities and activities of private companies? And for those (hopefully very few) that really don't understand this - why do you think these are in the linked article:
"... FBI’s remarkable attempt to force Google ..." ..."
"The court warrants
Templates are fine (for some definition of fine) for static type systems where types can be decided and code specialized at compile time.
Julia is however dynamic and uses different mechanism.
Otherwise claiming "Julia is the only high-level language that has run at petascale" is a bit of an exaggeration.
If you think so you are very religious.
First this chip was designed at Centaur Technology in the US, a subsidiary of the main VIA. They design x86 processors, don't blame other crap on them.
Second this isn't a problem with the chip - it's a problem in software not configuring the chip correctly according to the documentation.
Third their x86 processors were designed for a specific market for which they are/were a good fit.
Lot of work to find something (partially) documented. Sandpile lists the instruction as ALTINST, the code is documented by VIA as used for testing with an MSR (Machine Specific Register) bit to enable it. If not enabled I assume it would be treated as an illegal instruction.
That some machine with a C3 processor didn't set the correct machine configuration is bad but not the end of the world - just set it correctly in the OS instead.
none of them actually did anything wrong
Citation needed. Actually it's not needed as your "none" makes the statement false, more than one farmer have been proven to deliberately plant seeds protected by a Monsanto patent without the right to do so.
You or another AC have already posted this "argument", doing it repeatedly is spamming/fishing for responses.
Your argument is idiotic, that's why you don't get the responses you want. So please stop.
Uphill - both ways.
No need to change the law. Just because you can find something it isn't yours, you entitled SOB!
Since before you were born.
Maybe you should click on the story link...
OMicrosoft!
I think you are responding to a post full of irony.
It's fucking beautiful! No crap - just content.
Remember that Mel worked alone.
You already said it: incompetent "designers".