That is a completely separate matter: products containing GMO over trace levels have to be marked as such anyway. And any GMO content, trace or not, have to be approved by the EU.
But it means it is essentially an unsupported part of the system. Apple: We will not support OpenGL in the future. Autodesk: Then we will not support macOS in the future.
If you use your phone 16/7 then OLED is probably a bad choice, not because the screen become very degraded but due to the uneven degradation mentioned in that article. Most people don't use their screens at maximum brightness and have the screen off most of the day and then OLED is a reasonable choice.
Do you give that to Tesla* drivers too? Because no matter how many tests have been done on any safety critical equipment in the end there will always be a "life or death" test.
(* selected for impact, replace with whatever brand of car you want. Yes, I'm microtrolling)
The algorithm doesn't care about race, only in crimes, so isn't racist unless there are more crime reported by racists due to being racists - and then the racism isn't in the algorithm.
Strange, I've never seen that happen on this machine. OTOH I've seen the computer turned on by itself without updating anything which is irritating - perhaps due to some bug that fails to start the update.
The big problem is the huge amount of (l)users that refuse to install security updates, often people that "know better" and never scanned for viruses as they "obviously" haven't been exposed.
This solution is of course not ideal and a PITA in more ways than one. The best would be transparent security updates done in the background with a few seconds switch (with preserved program state) to the updated code when finished - but that isn't generally backwards compatible and potentially a huge PITA for programmers.
Do what I do: close the notebook (screen) triggering hibernation. The update crap is still there when turning on the machine again so it's not perfect...
Citation needed. I'll provide the one in the paper: "Although we did not demonstrate attacks on AMD and ARM processors, they also use RSBs to predict return addresses"
I'll also note that the only demonstrated working attack is against Intel SGX enclaves, something that is Intel specific. There are demonstrations that do not expose information within a process and between two co-operating processes however those are normally not a security problem.
No doubt some type of attack using the return address stack is possible on AMD, ARM, and other processors with branch prediction. However that isn't demonstrated and it isn't claimed in the linked paper.
Slashdot Mirror
It's not the makeup that's important - it's the personality.
Sucks for me then - got my gray hairs at 15.
And isn't the most efficient algorithm the one that needn't be run? Much of the javascript on the web isn't necessary at all.
How many times in your life have you started from scratch mate? Or are you just all talk?
And with the same quality reasoning: forcing everyone to pay for security most don't need - isn't that filthy socialism?
You don't think Amazon may include those in their "less than 1 percent"?
That is a completely separate matter: products containing GMO over trace levels have to be marked as such anyway. And any GMO content, trace or not, have to be approved by the EU.
But it means it is essentially an unsupported part of the system.
Apple: We will not support OpenGL in the future.
Autodesk: Then we will not support macOS in the future.
People presents unusual cold/snow events as proof that global warming is a hoax. They are wrong.
As are you.
Exceptionally hot and cold years have been noted since we have documented history.
Socialist doesn't mean what you think it does...
Silo?
As usual some "bugs" (Intel erratas) will be fixed and some new created.
Don't know what that have to do with Intels failure of getting their 10nm process up and running?
If this was a computer company that refused to resale parts or provide repair information everyone here would be having a coronary.
No.
Someone how only Tesla gets a pass on this...
No.
Care to explain your position?
No.
You beat me to it. A beetle (the insect) thrown from a tall building survives, a beetle glued to a rock will not.
If you use your phone 16/7 then OLED is probably a bad choice, not because the screen become very degraded but due to the uneven degradation mentioned in that article. Most people don't use their screens at maximum brightness and have the screen off most of the day and then OLED is a reasonable choice.
Do you give that to Tesla* drivers too? Because no matter how many tests have been done on any safety critical equipment in the end there will always be a "life or death" test.
(* selected for impact, replace with whatever brand of car you want. Yes, I'm microtrolling)
Move to Somalia and get all the freedom you want.
The algorithm doesn't care about race, only in crimes, so isn't racist unless there are more crime reported by racists due to being racists - and then the racism isn't in the algorithm.
Who kills the most people, the police or criminals?
Who hurts more people physically, emotionally and/or economically, the police or criminals?
I think you would get both of those wrong given the putrid bile above but the facts are out there if you'd be interested.
Strange, I've never seen that happen on this machine. OTOH I've seen the computer turned on by itself without updating anything which is irritating - perhaps due to some bug that fails to start the update.
The big problem is the huge amount of (l)users that refuse to install security updates, often people that "know better" and never scanned for viruses as they "obviously" haven't been exposed.
This solution is of course not ideal and a PITA in more ways than one. The best would be transparent security updates done in the background with a few seconds switch (with preserved program state) to the updated code when finished - but that isn't generally backwards compatible and potentially a huge PITA for programmers.
Do what I do: close the notebook (screen) triggering hibernation. The update crap is still there when turning on the machine again so it's not perfect...
Yes that was pretty much what happened - BECAUSE THE CORE PROBLEMS WERE ALREADY CORRECTED.
There haven't even been 20 years and history revisionism is going strong.
Actually gathering information however it's commonly released to shame people.
I suggest you go calibrate your thinker - it is making illogical inferences.
All text just to indirectly call Musk an idiot?
Citation needed. I'll provide the one in the paper: "Although we did not demonstrate attacks on AMD and ARM processors, they also use RSBs to predict return addresses"
I'll also note that the only demonstrated working attack is against Intel SGX enclaves, something that is Intel specific. There are demonstrations that do not expose information within a process and between two co-operating processes however those are normally not a security problem.
No doubt some type of attack using the return address stack is possible on AMD, ARM, and other processors with branch prediction. However that isn't demonstrated and it isn't claimed in the linked paper.