Yes. Due to interactions with other magnetic objects. Yes. Nowhere, the energy comes from external sources - a potential energy between two magnetic objects have to be in place for there to be any force. By magnetizing with an external magnetic field, in the electron spin of the magnet atoms, it isn't.
Should be trivial: fingerprint the question, if X searches are the same within a certain time limit then ignore it and add the fingerprint to a persistent database of phrases to ignore.
Or why not remove Burger King from their search engine? A milder version would be pushing up a warning page when searching for Burger King or any of their trademarks...
Not hyperbole - trolling. The likelihood of the OP just being an ignorant fool decreases greatly when taking into the account the choice of words and presentation.
Sexual assault? The thing is that conditional consent fails when the condition fails. Just because two people consent to sex doesn't mean that one person starting to fuck the other while he/she is asleep isn't rape. Just because a girl consent to normal (vaginal) sex doesn't mean forcing a penis, finger or hand up their ass is okay.
I admit that the case you are referring to is a bit of borderline but that's just it - not only was there one instance of the same thing happening, there were two closely timed instances indicating the person in question have a habit of doing it. That the person in question is a lying, slandering coward that tries to call an investigation into his activities political harassment and hides away (with ludicrous excuses) when realizing that what he have done is considered rape (and rightly so) really speaks for itself.
No. For several reasons: Sweden have a different definition of rape than many other countries, there is no social stigma in reporting a rape unlike many countries and the legal system have to handle any (substantial) claims of criminal activity even if the victim doesn't seek help themselves.
IOW the rape rate in Sweden can't be directly compared to other countries and if compensated for then it is in the normal range of a western nation.
While that may be your impression it doesn't fit the data we have here in the real world. Windows have always supported installation of programs from several sources and the addition of the application store didn't change that.
Today, April 7, 2017 - a date which will live in infamy - the nation of Syria was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval forces of the United States of America. --
Oh I forgot, military action _against_ international laws without declaration of war is only bad if anybody else does it to you, right?
"I think the real question is whether Assad did it, or the rebels (in order to provoke a reaction from the US)."
Occam's razor applies.
What is more likely: 1. A regime that has manufactured Sarin gas and used it in one or more previous attacks on it's own people. 2. Rebels manufactured Sarin (not an easy process) or captured chemical precursors, mixed them appropriately (Sarin has a short half-life and is not stored pre-mixed) and engaged a highly risky strategy of attacking their own supporters in the hope the US would attack Assad, despite the US not having done so on a previous much worse attack.
Making sarin is actually quite simple, what isn't simple is making it pure enough that it can be stored. Now binary munitions (mixing before or during use) are a good thing for chemical weapons, the source materials are less poisonous that the result (otherwise why not use the unreacted chemicals) and thus reduces risks for the attackers.
There are more than two parties in the Syrian war BTW.
3. As a Syrian paper claimed: Asad's bombers hit a rebel chemical weapons storage that happened to mix the Sarin precursors within useful limits (despite one precursor being highly flammable) and "accidentally" gassed civilians. And then by a total coincidence shelled a hospital treating the victims.
That's just noise. Why should we accept that: . You know what the Syrian paper wrote. . That the Syrian paper knew what they wrote about. . The likelyhood of the source chemicals mixing to produce Sarin being too low. . That the storage area didn't contain pre-mixed Sarin stored there (which unlike your claim can be done). . That the storage area didn't contain mixed Sarin intended for near-time use (in which case bad quality chemicals etc. doesn't limit short time storage). . That shelling a hospital somehow support the claim Assad used chemical weapons. Especially as claims of the regime attacking hospitals are/were quite frequent.
There are plenty of conservatives that doesn't like the anti-science, far-right pleasing turn of the republican party. Trying to paint everyone as being either "left" (the US version - center for most of the world) or right (the US version, in most of the world those that far right generally jump a bit more to extreme right) is not factual, not helping people realize that most "left" persons share some viewpoints of the right ones and vice versa. It kills debates and foster an unhealthy focus on following the party line - and that is a real danger to the democratic idea.
IMHO of course. Demonize people if that's what you want.
First inform yourself what political left is - you obvious don't know shit (or your wouldn't write like that).
We already know that a large portion of the exit population voted exit because they didn't like foreigners being allowed into the UK stealing jobs etc. (this is supported by that being actual arguments used by exit campaigns and that people being interviewed about the referendum saying that being an important part) - that's the definition of xenophobe. We also know that racist organizations in the UK supported the exit so at least a part of the voters are also racist.
How about the FUD and lies from the exit people? Like the ones how much money could be saved? Like how foreigners were a danger _and_ how the UK could control their own borders (read: keeping out the filthy foreigners) while being part of the free market? FFS the exit people didn't even have the guts to stand behind their convictions instead bailing letting others take care of the crap...
And your percentages are very wrong - more than 50% is a fantasy that would easily be corrected by actually having read anything about the freaking vote.
Bullshit. Violent attacks are one thing and war is something completely different. It is more likely to die from a car accident, flight accident or even by cutting ones finger (and getting blood poisoning). Far more people die of leaking butane in mobile homes than by terrorist attacks. Smoking still kill more people too.
War? War is hell, terror is a nuisance*.
(* not intended to downplay the suffering caused by terrorist attacks)
It isn't nonsense. Missing relationship is one interpretation of a null value but it isn't the only one. The big problem are the languages where a pointer can always be null however using null as a return value have real problems too.
It is also slow, not very compatible, doesn't allow hardware access. That's assuming there have been no complete rewrite since I last looked at it (not likely). The development method seemed to be: try to run game, if it doesn't run at all - bad, if it does run but buggy - good enough unless a developer is interested in that specific game in which case some hacks are done.
Slashdot Mirror
My understanding, probably wrong.
Yes. Due to interactions with other magnetic objects.
Yes.
Nowhere, the energy comes from external sources - a potential energy between two magnetic objects have to be in place for there to be any force. By magnetizing with an external magnetic field, in the electron spin of the magnet atoms, it isn't.
Should be trivial: fingerprint the question, if X searches are the same within a certain time limit then ignore it and add the fingerprint to a persistent database of phrases to ignore.
Or why not remove Burger King from their search engine? A milder version would be pushing up a warning page when searching for Burger King or any of their trademarks...
Yeah I think you shouldn't believe what stormfront posters claim. Have you ever even met a Jew?
Not hyperbole - trolling. The likelihood of the OP just being an ignorant fool decreases greatly when taking into the account the choice of words and presentation.
Sexual assault? The thing is that conditional consent fails when the condition fails. Just because two people consent to sex doesn't mean that one person starting to fuck the other while he/she is asleep isn't rape. Just because a girl consent to normal (vaginal) sex doesn't mean forcing a penis, finger or hand up their ass is okay.
I admit that the case you are referring to is a bit of borderline but that's just it - not only was there one instance of the same thing happening, there were two closely timed instances indicating the person in question have a habit of doing it. That the person in question is a lying, slandering coward that tries to call an investigation into his activities political harassment and hides away (with ludicrous excuses) when realizing that what he have done is considered rape (and rightly so) really speaks for itself.
No. For several reasons: Sweden have a different definition of rape than many other countries, there is no social stigma in reporting a rape unlike many countries and the legal system have to handle any (substantial) claims of criminal activity even if the victim doesn't seek help themselves.
IOW the rape rate in Sweden can't be directly compared to other countries and if compensated for then it is in the normal range of a western nation.
Couldn't you just have stopped yourself before posting such an obvious strawman?
Not "just a model" as the FA states that the aircraft did in fact take off - so a flying aircraft, not a model of one.
While that may be your impression it doesn't fit the data we have here in the real world. Windows have always supported installation of programs from several sources and the addition of the application store didn't change that.
Today, April 7, 2017 - a date which will live in infamy - the nation of Syria was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval forces of the United States of America.
--
Oh I forgot, military action _against_ international laws without declaration of war is only bad if anybody else does it to you, right?
"I think the real question is whether Assad did it, or the rebels (in order to provoke a reaction from the US)."
Occam's razor applies.
What is more likely:
1. A regime that has manufactured Sarin gas and used it in one or more previous attacks on it's own people.
2. Rebels manufactured Sarin (not an easy process) or captured chemical precursors, mixed them appropriately (Sarin has a short half-life and is not stored pre-mixed) and engaged a highly risky strategy of attacking their own supporters in the hope the US would attack Assad, despite the US not having done so on a previous much worse attack.
Making sarin is actually quite simple, what isn't simple is making it pure enough that it can be stored. Now binary munitions (mixing before or during use) are a good thing for chemical weapons, the source materials are less poisonous that the result (otherwise why not use the unreacted chemicals) and thus reduces risks for the attackers.
There are more than two parties in the Syrian war BTW.
3. As a Syrian paper claimed: Asad's bombers hit a rebel chemical weapons storage that happened to mix the Sarin precursors within useful limits (despite one precursor being highly flammable) and "accidentally" gassed civilians. And then by a total coincidence shelled a hospital treating the victims.
That's just noise. Why should we accept that:
. You know what the Syrian paper wrote.
. That the Syrian paper knew what they wrote about.
. The likelyhood of the source chemicals mixing to produce Sarin being too low.
. That the storage area didn't contain pre-mixed Sarin stored there (which unlike your claim can be done).
. That the storage area didn't contain mixed Sarin intended for near-time use (in which case bad quality chemicals etc. doesn't limit short time storage).
. That shelling a hospital somehow support the claim Assad used chemical weapons. Especially as claims of the regime attacking hospitals are/were quite frequent.
No, no! We all see that you do.
There are plenty of conservatives that doesn't like the anti-science, far-right pleasing turn of the republican party. Trying to paint everyone as being either "left" (the US version - center for most of the world) or right (the US version, in most of the world those that far right generally jump a bit more to extreme right) is not factual, not helping people realize that most "left" persons share some viewpoints of the right ones and vice versa. It kills debates and foster an unhealthy focus on following the party line - and that is a real danger to the democratic idea.
IMHO of course. Demonize people if that's what you want.
Sadly few will read your post and even fewer will learn anything.
It's just that the UK was one of the wolves...
First inform yourself what political left is - you obvious don't know shit (or your wouldn't write like that).
We already know that a large portion of the exit population voted exit because they didn't like foreigners being allowed into the UK stealing jobs etc. (this is supported by that being actual arguments used by exit campaigns and that people being interviewed about the referendum saying that being an important part) - that's the definition of xenophobe. We also know that racist organizations in the UK supported the exit so at least a part of the voters are also racist.
Those are the facts. Now grow up.
How about the FUD and lies from the exit people? Like the ones how much money could be saved? Like how foreigners were a danger _and_ how the UK could control their own borders (read: keeping out the filthy foreigners) while being part of the free market? FFS the exit people didn't even have the guts to stand behind their convictions instead bailing letting others take care of the crap...
And your percentages are very wrong - more than 50% is a fantasy that would easily be corrected by actually having read anything about the freaking vote.
WTF?!? Russia is small!?!? It's the largest country in the world by far!
Yeah maybe you should do some study of history before writing such idiotic shit? Because that's all it is, idiotic bovine-quality feces.
Bullshit. Violent attacks are one thing and war is something completely different. It is more likely to die from a car accident, flight accident or even by cutting ones finger (and getting blood poisoning). Far more people die of leaking butane in mobile homes than by terrorist attacks. Smoking still kill more people too.
War? War is hell, terror is a nuisance*.
(* not intended to downplay the suffering caused by terrorist attacks)
It isn't nonsense. Missing relationship is one interpretation of a null value but it isn't the only one. The big problem are the languages where a pointer can always be null however using null as a return value have real problems too.
IIRC neither. Which would make it pretty useless.
It is also slow, not very compatible, doesn't allow hardware access. That's assuming there have been no complete rewrite since I last looked at it (not likely). The development method seemed to be: try to run game, if it doesn't run at all - bad, if it does run but buggy - good enough unless a developer is interested in that specific game in which case some hacks are done.
There are better ways to run old software.
You realize that the (socialist) anarchist dream world doesn't even have a state? Or that communism as defined by Marx doesn't really have a state?