Slashdot Mirror


User: Luyseyal

Luyseyal's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,608
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,608

  1. slashdotters... on Daily Sex Helps Improve Fertility · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slashdotters would be lucky to get once a month, much less daily...

    -l

  2. Re:It doesn't matter on Memory Usage of Chrome, Firefox 3.5, et al. · · Score: 1

    I recommend Lite mode. They only break it about once a year.

    -l

  3. Re:"Blocks"? on US Military Blocks Data On Incoming Meteors · · Score: 3, Informative

    In all fairness, the article's subheading is "Satellite information on incoming meteors is blocked."

    -l

  4. Re:BluRay? on DRM Group Set To Phase Out "Analog Hole" · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Indeed while the Samsung LED TVs are not true LED TVs, I noticed that they are using free software in them. Page 91 of the fine manual reads...

    • This product uses parts of the software from the Independent JPEG Group.
    • This product uses parts of the software owned by the Freetype Project (www.freetype.org).
    • This product uses some software programs which are distributed under the GPL/LGPL license. Accordingly, the following GPL and LGPL software source codes that have been used in this product can be provided after asking to vdswmanager@ samsung.com.
      GPL software: Linux Kernel, Busybox, Binutils
      LGPL software: Glibc, ffmpeg, smpeg, libgphoto, libusb, SDL

    Kinda neat, though I wonder what kind of VD they have in mind for their software manager...
    -l

  5. Re:Seriously Java? on Java Gets New Garbage Collector, But Only If You Buy Support · · Score: 0, Redundant

    That is brilliant and widely applicable. I love it!

    -l

  6. Re:Just Throw It on the Meme Heap on 45-Year-Old Modem Used To Surf the Web · · Score: 2, Funny

    +++

  7. Re:Relative speeds on Atlantis Links Up To Hubble For Repairs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think you have it backwards. He understood that there is no actual fixed reference. He just meant that choosing the earth as a reference point didn't help one determine whether the linkage was difficult or not. Short answer: cut him some slack.

    Delta-V, FTW!
    -l

  8. Re:Saw It in Music! Coming Soon in Games, E-Books on Why Bother With DRM? · · Score: 1

    Sins of a Solar Empire

    My son bought a used copy of the game and you can't use it online unless you have the previous account holder deactivated. So, it's not as DRM-free as it might sound.

    -l

  9. Re:Which sockets API? on Have Sockets Run Their Course? · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sounds like a new achievement "Too much karma: Enlightenment to Anonymous Cowardom"

    -l

  10. Re:SMS vs email on Why Text Messages Are Limited To 160 Characters · · Score: 1

    SMS is faster: because there is no GPRS/TCP/IP/SMTP/IMAP/POP connection and transfer overhead

    Like during SXSW when it took 30 minutes for me to receive text messages, but I could call people without a problem.

    SMS is cheaper: most plans offer a sufficient amount of free messages a month for most users, e-mail requires an additional GPRS data plan

    Maybe it's just Austin, TX, but most of the plans around here have no free SMS messages.

    MMVC, (my mileage varies considerably)
    -l

  11. Re:Not good enough. on GE Introduces 500GB Holographic Disks · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yep. It also means all the data is stored on the surface of a sphere surrounding the disk.

    I'll crawl back to my hole now,
    -l

  12. Re:Similar to Windows hate? on Comic Sans, Font of Ill Will · · Score: 1

    <insert speech about defaults creating defacto monopolies>

    -l

  13. Re:Pushing the limits of tech on Solar Powered Car Can Get Close To 60 mph · · Score: 1

    I want to drive an electric golf cart to the "highway", get on a high-speed train of other golf carts, push a button to make it let me off near my destination, and then drive the cart to my job. And do the reverse on the way back.

    -l

  14. Re:I'll give it a go... on Scientists Begin Mapping the Brain · · Score: 1

    They gravitate to fields that hold an interest/importance to them.

    Indeed, I've found myself gravitating toward general relativity for some time now!

    -l

  15. Re:Causality on Quantum Setback For Warp Drives · · Score: 1

    That's the thing with the cosmological constant, though. It won't rip atoms apart because the acceleration is just too slow. If you're going with a strong scalar field ala phantom energy, sure, that's a possibility.

    Unfortunately for us, the data points to w =~ -1 which means that we won't be able to distinguish between the cosmological constant and a scalar field based solely on that parameter. We'll need some new experiments instead.

    I did read this, which was pretty cool:

    It is of interest to note that if the equation for gravity were to approach r instead of r^2 at large, intergalactic distances, then the acceleration of the expansion of the universe becomes a mathematical artifact,[clarification needed] negating the need for the existence of Dark Energy.

    "clarification needed" indeed!
    -l

  16. Re:Good Game, "old media", it was mediocre... on 97 of Top 100 Classified Sites Are Craigslist · · Score: 1

    Then...and this one made me really sad, Slashdot jumped on the web 2.0 bandwagon. What was once a clean, obvious, straight-forward website was transformed into a disgusting mess...

    Yep. Lite mode, FTW!

    -l

  17. Re:Causality on Quantum Setback For Warp Drives · · Score: 1

    Are you thinking of the Big Rip? I think that one requires quintessence, whereas the accepted model thus far has been the cosmological constant. That one leans toward entropy eating up local spaces.

    -l

  18. Re:Proof! on Quantum Setback For Warp Drives · · Score: 1

    The exception was an idea coming out of the concept that there might be something acting a bit like an extra extended space dimension that was only accessable to gravity.

    It is mentioned in Brian Greene's Fabric of the Cosmos. I don't remember if he took it all that seriously or not.

    -l

  19. Re:Causality on Quantum Setback For Warp Drives · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen anything that supports the notion that inflation will tear anything apart. Rather, common forces act as a countermeasure to dark energy in local space. Eventually, the entropy increase of inflation will rob local systems of their energy, but in general, I wouldn't call this a "tearing apart".

    -l

  20. Re:Causality on Quantum Setback For Warp Drives · · Score: 1

    A perpetual motion machine however implies doing work, suggesting that energy can continually be transformed from one form to another.

    Indeed, it is... perpetually transferred from anything into entropy. Haha.

    Let the beatings begin!
    -l

  21. Did they fix session management? on Review of GNOME 2.26 and GTK+ 2.16 · · Score: 1

    My biggest question: Did they fix session management? On my Ubuntu 8.10 box, sessions and session saving is completely hosed. I have been eagerly awaiting a fix for this severe regression.

    -l

  22. Re:So... on Reflected Gravitational Waves · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, the strong force mediators -- the gluons -- are massless too, as are photons (electromagnetism). It turns out mass is not necessary to interact with matter. This is why physicists are so taken with "fields". You can define a number of fields in which a particle participates which are mutually exclusive, but all add up to define where a particle is and what it's doing.

    This is why Higgs is so exciting. It's the Higgs field which is supposed to give baryons (normal matter) mass. The general idea is that the Higgs field takes up some of a particle's energy and causes it to give off gravity. The trade-off is that the particle cannot travel at the speed of light. Some people like to think of Higgs as a "dragging field", like a particle slogging its way through mud.

    -l

  23. Re:In some ways it was much better in 1996 on Jurassic Web · · Score: 1

    Obviously, I meant to type "from Hotbot to Google".

  24. Re:In some ways it was much better in 1996 on Jurassic Web · · Score: 1

    No kidding. I was all about Hotbot for the very reason that it was a zillion times more usable than Altavista. It took awhile for me to switch from Google to Hotbot because it was a fairly reliable engine. Eventually PageRank won out. No one knew about Hotbot, though, which was part of its demise. It should've been run better from the beginning.

    -l

  25. "the World Wide Web" on Jurassic Web · · Score: 1

    TFA states that "[p]eople still refer to the new medium by its full name--the World Wide Web." Sure, maybe in articles of the era, however, I don't think I knew anyone who didn't just call it "the internet". As geeks we knew Internet > Web, but it didn't matter. It was "the internet" as far as common parlance was concerned.

    -l