Slashdot Mirror


Daily Sex Helps Improve Fertility

mmmscience writes "While fertility studies lately seem to have been exclusively focused on in vitro fertilization [IVF], new data coming out of Australia may help with unaided successful conceptions. The study has found that men who have ejaculate daily produce sperm with less damaged DNA. While such actions decrease sperm concentration, it does increase motility, meaning healthier sperm have a better chance of making it all the way to the egg. Good news, as another report has found severe chromosome abnormalities in over 90% of IVF eggs, meaning artificial insemination is just now discovering a whole new field of problems."

174 comments

  1. Nothing to do with sex... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Although if 'twice a day' helps, all of slashdot should have near perfect DNA.

    Now to just find someone to spread it to..

    1. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by langelgjm · · Score: 4, Funny

      Right, because what this world needs is a bunch of Slashdotters reproducing :-P

      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    2. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by sys.stdout.write · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow, I guess every sprem is sacred, for its death helps others succeed.

      Catholicism could learn a lot from this study!

    3. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 5, Funny

      All those sperm, dying for your sins. That's ironic on so many levels.

    4. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by sopssa · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can count my DNA will be *great*, as I wank atleast 4 times a day.

    5. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Have you looked at the rest of the world recently? You have to get waaaaaay down there to drag the average down...

    6. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by sopssa · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sorry, I browse the world at +4

    7. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by wireloose · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, we knew most of this same information in the 60's/70's. Not exactly news now, we knew that sperm "aged" and degraded.

      More work happened in the 90's. http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/8/8/1251

      Meanwhile, this article pretty well describes the reason that most slashdotters have (or will soon have) pattern baldness: http://www.steadyhealth.com/articles/Consequences_of_over_masturbation_a589_f0.html

    8. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's cause the world is pretty redundant at -1

    9. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by AmigaHeretic · · Score: 1

      >>Although if 'twice a day' helps, all of slashdot should have near perfect DNA.

      Yeah, the Mormons should start recruiting on Slashdot. We could breed like mofos for them if we could just get girls.

    10. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      What about the decrease in ejaculatory volume? When you shoot the first mega-nut, the next nut after that is 50-25% the volume of the first nut, and then it decreases substantially from there. What I want is the formula which specifies average increases in motility with decreases in volume.

    11. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by Plekto · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      You can count my DNA will be *great*, as I wank at least 4 times a day.

      The problem, though, is that guys who don't get any and usually need to resort to those tactics are also less likely to be prime specimens. This would explain why the world seems to be getting dumber - those idiots who don't get any - when they *finally* do by some miracle, they have great chances of having stupid kids.

    12. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by the_other_chewey · · Score: 4, Funny

      You can count my DNA will be *great*, as I wank atleast 4 times a day.

      Hats off to those modding the above "informative"

    13. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by symbolset · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, yes. Yes it does. As bad as this group is, it's far above the common troll. Consider idiocracy. Now go read 4chan, MSNBC, CNN and Fark. Then come back and comment about how the people here need to surrender their reproductivity to support the Darwinian selection of those mental giants.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    14. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by sgbett · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If being able to 'get it' is considered an important quality for improving the gene pool then god help us all.

      --
      Invaders must die
    15. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by niktemadur · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Although if 'twice a day' helps, all of slashdot should have near perfect DNA.

      Now to just find someone to spread it to..

      That's one way of looking at it.

      Here's another, less obvious one, which I read in a Timothy Leary essay about fifteen years ago:
      The anatomy contains organs that serve to keep the individual alive, such as heart, lungs, liver, etc.
      The anatomy also contains organs that serve no purpose in keeping the individual alive, but are focused on the preservation of the species, such as ovaries, whose sole function is to produce the female egg, and the prostate, whose sole function is to secrete a lubricant which aids in ejaculation, a strange little organ.
      Statistically, it seems these organs are the ones that do us in first, by "virtue" of being the most vulnerable to cancer, the highest rates among females being of the ovarian and breast variety, while the highest among males of the prostate variety.

      Could it be that as we gradually cease to use our procreative organs, as we are no longer useful to the natural order of things, nature itself has a mechanism to push us aside?

      And so, in inimitable style, Mr Leary, who was dying of prostate cancer then, concluded his musings with the following empirical conclusion and advice for us all: "Use it or lose it!"

      As an amusing afterthought, when I mentioned this article to friends, some of them said "So that means I should fuck every day?", while others said "So that means it's okay if I jack off every day?" Caught them with their guard down, spilled the beans all by themselves.

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
    16. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wow, I guess every sprem is sacred

      I, for one, welcome our new dyslexic sprem overlords.

    17. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Meanwhile, this article pretty well describes the reason that most slashdotters have (or will soon have) pattern baldness:
      http://www.steadyhealth.com/articles/Consequences_of_over_masturbation_a589_f0.html

      Did you happen to catch the part of the article that says that's a myth?

    18. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by bsDaemon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, it's definitely an important requirement for being able to contribute to the gene pool, and one can't improve that to which one does not contribute. Unless everyone else counts "staying out of the way" as a contribution.

    19. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by smchris · · Score: 2, Funny

      Speaking of. I always heard that sperm banks didn't want their donors masturbating between sessions. Seems like now it's a quality vs. quantity issue, as it were, These findings could significantly increase the bank of happy donors.

    20. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by Krneki · · Score: 1

      Exactly it's an old news, I remember 20 years ago when we talked about sex in school, the teacher said it is ok to wank, since the sperm gets renewed.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    21. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by johndmartiniii · · Score: 1

      True enough. I sometimes accidentally read comments elsewhere and think "What the #*$% is wrong with these people?" /.ers can at least sort of spell and use complete sentences. This indicates that any /. offspring might have a chance at being a bit better spoken than their peers if not actually more intelligent.

      --
      If you don't know what you're doing, you can't make mistakes.
    22. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by Aggrajag · · Score: 1

      No, that helps keeping the prostate clean. I had prostate problems
      about six month ago and my doctor suggested ejaculation as a cure:
      sex (yes, I have a wife) or masturbation. The alternative was to
      eat alfa-blockers (Tamsulosin) which reduce blood pressure but in
      my case BP was getting way too low and causing a lot of problems.

      So a lot of ejaculations will keep your prostate in good shape.

    23. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by Bigbutt · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is something I believe in as well. A well used prostate, either sex or wanking, keeps the sperm on the move. When they hang about, they degrade and degenerate potentially causing damage to the prostate and opening yourself up to cancer.

      At 52 when lots of folk are complaining about slow stream and poor PSAs, I'm not having any of those problems.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    24. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by BigBlueOx · · Score: 1

      Wherein we specify the causes of the experimentally verified effect: "Slashdotters Don't Get Any" :
      Exhibit:
      What about the decrease in ejaculatory volume? ... What I want is the formula which specifies average increases in motility with decreases in volume.

      THESIS REJECTED
      Not double-spaced, not submitted on correct brand of paper, used wrong font, ink colors incorrect

    25. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by archermadness · · Score: 1

      OK, that is the dumbest article I've read in a while. Among other things, it claims that the void created by ejaculation is filled by air, and this air somehow travels to the brain, causing thermal shock!

    26. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by nycguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Timely rebuttal: http://www.xkcd.com/603

    27. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by jahudabudy · · Score: 2, Funny

      As an amusing afterthought, when I mentioned this article to friends, some of them said "So that means I should fuck every day?", while others said "So that means it's okay if I jack off every day?" Caught them with their guard down, spilled the beans all by themselves.

      Only the second group...

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    28. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So that means it's okay if I jack off every day?"

      I don't even understand that question. In what sense could it possibly not be okay? Do your friends think they'll get hairy palms or go blind or something? Do they live in the middle ages?

    29. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I call bs on your second link. How do you know a high masturbation frequency isn't the result of high testosterone levels to begin with? There could conceivably be some sort of positive feedback effect but either way that website has no references (but plenty of herbal products though...)

    30. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      It would've made a better joke if every sprem were "scared". imo.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    31. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      What about the decrease in ejaculatory volume?

      http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/ConservationOfNinjutsu>

    32. Re:Nothing to do with sex... by niktemadur · · Score: 1

      Do they live in the middle ages?

      You'd be surprised how many people still do. My calculated guess would be that they're angling to rationally disregard that ol' catholic morality indoctrinated during youth.
      What is it that the Jesuits say? "Give me a man for the first seven years of his life, after that you can have him, you'll never break him".

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
  2. Good news by Starlon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For the porn industry.

    --
    Health Freedom is almost as popular as Freedom itself.
  3. Summary misleading by Macgrrl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While the news services have all been reporting that Daily Sex will improve fertility - surely a more accurate description would be that daily ejaculation (via whatever means) improves fertility.

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    1. Re:Summary misleading by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, but the headline "Daily Ejaculation Helps Improve Fertility" would not help convince my wife to have sex with me. It would instead encourage her to send me to the bathroom with the SI Swimsuit issue.

      That is no good.

      I would prefer the headline to stay as it is, or perhaps to be changed to "Daily Receipt of Fellatio Helps Improve Fertility".

      But I think that might be too much to ask for.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:Summary misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good heavens! All my ejaculations are verbal! I have a ghastly feeling that they're not going to help!

    3. Re:Summary misleading by arekusu_ou · · Score: 1

      Leave it to a slashdotter to take focus away from the benefits of daily sex.

    4. Re:Summary misleading by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Funny

      I would prefer the headline to stay as it is, or perhaps to be changed to "Daily Receipt of Fellatio Helps Improve Fertility".

      News: BILL CLINTON POSTS ON SLASHDOT!

      Speaking of receipts - wouldt paying for getting a "Monica" now be tax-deductible as preventative medicine or something?

    5. Re:Summary misleading by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      "I would prefer the headline to stay as it is, or perhaps to be changed to 'Daily Receipt of Fellatio Helps Improve Fertility'"

      Well, if the mechanism they propose is right then it's literally true. You could set up an experiment to prove it.

    6. Re:Summary misleading by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      News: BILL CLINTON POSTS ON SLASHDOT!

      [WJC voice] Ah feel your... tongue [/WJC voice]

      Something tells me that Hillary would NOT have wanted Bill to be fertile when they were in the White House... I don't think raising another crotch potato would have fit in with her career plans.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    7. Re:Summary misleading by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Not really surprising, considering that Macgrrl is, well, a girl....

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    8. Re:Summary misleading by youn · · Score: 1

      Lol, actually a girl, on slashdot... that is surprising ( although a pleasant surprise :) ),

      --
      Never antropomorphize computers, they do not like that :p
    9. Re:Summary misleading by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Since the theory is that stale sperm go bad, you might not get to (er, need to) "refresh" every day - only the day before you need some high quality stuff. (If so, the rationale for daily action is undermined.) That is my theory. Please cite me in your next study, thx.

    10. Re:Summary misleading by PPH · · Score: 5, Funny

      When I sent my wife this article, she suggested we try "annual sex". Sounds pretty kinky to me. But first, I'm going to have to help her with her spelling.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    11. Re:Summary misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Pics or it didn't happen.

    12. Re:Summary misleading by midmopub · · Score: 2, Informative
    13. Re:Summary misleading by Macgrrl · · Score: 4, Funny

      I would prefer the headline to stay as it is, or perhaps to be changed to "Daily Receipt of Fellatio Helps Improve Fertility".

      Shush - you're getting my husband all excited with the concept.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    14. Re:Summary misleading by Macgrrl · · Score: 4, Funny

      don't you mean "Screen Shot or it didn't happen"?

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    15. Re:Summary misleading by aknowles · · Score: 0, Redundant

      More good news: Oral Sex Good for Your Fetus? http://www.momlogic.com/2009/06/is_oral_sex_good_for_your_fetu.php

    16. Re:Summary misleading by rubycodez · · Score: 4, Funny

      sounds better than aural sex

    17. Re:Summary misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No he got it right the first time.

    18. Re:Summary misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Come again?

    19. Re:Summary misleading by ocularDeathRay · · Score: 1

      So if I understand this article, your sig alone has already helped my fertility 3 times

      --
      Obama is a twitter sock puppet
    20. Re:Summary misleading by symbolset · · Score: 1

      Well, if the mechanism they propose is right then it's literally true. You could set up an experiment to prove it.

      Some grant potential here. This is not a bookmark.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    21. Re:Summary misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to wonder what good "improved fertility" will do your wife? It may be that she may want to conceive once every few years, but here's to hoping she looks like a swimsuit model herself by that time....

    22. Re:Summary misleading by ciderVisor · · Score: 3, Funny

      Prick up your ears !

      --
      Squirrel!
    23. Re:Summary misleading by Krneki · · Score: 1

      Sex is a mind game, if your wife is not enough sexually active it's time to read some book and improve your sexual life.

      Sex is an integral part of a couple life. Don't listen to the church too much, it won't do you any good.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    24. Re:Summary misleading by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      When you get your grant sign me up as a participant. I don't want to run the study, because then I couldn't be a subject.

    25. Re:Summary misleading by pbhj · · Score: 1

      I would prefer the headline to stay as it is, or perhaps to be changed to "Daily Receipt of Fellatio Helps Improve Fertility".

      There is research that indicates fellatio can help to improve fertility. The analysis is something along these lines: female body can attack the sperm as it's recognised as being external matter; fellatio allows the body to recognise the sperm and adapt such that the immune response is reduced.

      No, I don't have a citation ...

    26. Re:Summary misleading by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      I would prefer the headline to stay as it is, or perhaps to be changed to "Daily Receipt of Fellatio Helps Improve Fertility".

      Well, here you go:
      Oral sex makes pregnancies safer and more successful - study
      http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~chuck/infopg/mirrors/repro/sm_514317.html

    27. Re:Summary misleading by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      My wife bought me the book Just Do It: How One Couple Turned Off the TV and Turned On Their Sex Lives for 101 Days (No Excuses!) for my birthday last year. To make a year-long story short, the couple decided to have sex at least once per day for 100 days. The book is actually quite good. Very humorous and not as dirty as you might expect a book about doing it every day might be. In fact, my only disappointment with the book was that it wasn't a sign that my wife wanted to try her own 100 day challenge! (Heck, I'm not greedy. I'd go for a 30 day challenge. Or even a 2 week challenge.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    28. Re:Summary misleading by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      That'll teach me to post quickly to Slashdot when I'm sleep deprived.... Should've been "to make a 100 day story short" not "to make a year-long story short." Though, there was another couple who did it every day for a year.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    29. Re:Summary misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would prefer the headline to stay as it is, or perhaps to be changed to "Daily Receipt of Fellatio Helps Improve Fertility".

      But I think that might be too much to ask for.

      How about Semen makes women happy?

    30. Re:Summary misleading by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      Sex is an integral part of a couple life. Don't listen to the church too much, it won't do you any good.

      Which Church? I know plenty of churches that actually offer sex courses for married couples to help them spice up their love life.

      Heck, there are even Christian sex shops on the Intertubes, so I REALLY don't know what you are on about. Christians LOVE sex.

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    31. Re:Summary misleading by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately there's a built in negative feedback loop. Improved fertility inhibits daily ejaculation.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    32. Re:Summary misleading by Krneki · · Score: 1

      This is new, I guess the church changes when it has to.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    33. Re:Summary misleading by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Your post reminded me of this website: christiannymphos.org. That again proves that you can find anything on the intertubes. Too bad I'm an atheist ;-)

    34. Re:Summary misleading by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      While the sex shops and the classes are new-ish, the attitude isn't.

      At least within the bounds of marriage, most Churches preach the motto of "Often, and with much Gusto" when it comes to sex.

      Now, most Churches do tend to say "ONLY within the marriage of a man and a woman, and ONLY involving them, no third parties or critters allowed." when speaking of sex.

      Also, I know the Catholic church (at least traditionally) is none too keen on masturbation, but I think they are the only ones.

      Apparently the "qualifications" that most Churches put on sex leads some people to think Churches don't like sex AT ALL. Not sure where they get that though, unless they are just being obtuse.

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    35. Re:Summary misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Are you trying to say that you and other retarded republicans dont enjoy oral?

    36. Re:Summary misleading by Krneki · · Score: 1

      I'm in a Catholic church society, so it might explain our different point of view.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    37. Re:Summary misleading by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      And a girl with a wicked sense of humour at that. :)

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
  4. Hold on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does masturbation count?

    1. Re:Hold on... by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Does masturbation count?

      Yes

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    2. Re:Hold on... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does masturbation count?

      Yes

      Oh thank god.

    3. Re:Hold on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it matter?

    4. Re:Hold on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No - don't thank God, cause she's gonna get REALLY IRATE about all this spoof not going to proper use, and she'll probably take drastic action and find some way to chop off all your johnsons, you naughty, naughty boys. Put that thing away, it'll explode if you play with it so much.

    5. Re:Hold on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does masturbation count?

      Yes

      Oh thank god.

      If DNA-quality is important to you...

    6. Re:Hold on... by niktemadur · · Score: 1

      Does masturbation count?

      Yes

      Mod parent Informative!!!

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
  5. slashdotters... by Luyseyal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Slashdotters would be lucky to get once a month, much less daily...

    -l

    --
    Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    1. Re:slashdotters... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Slashdotters would be lucky to get once a month, much less daily...

      Comic Book Guy: Inspired by the most logical race in the galaxy, the Vulcans, breeding will be permitted once every seven years. For many of you, this will be much less breeding. For me, much, much more.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  6. Internet Filter by Gandalf_Greyhame · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hmm... does that mean that if Senator Stephen Conroy's internet filter gets built, I can get a medical prescription to download porn?

    --
    I am not stubborn. I am right!
    1. Re:Internet Filter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the prescription would say something like, "take two candystripers and call me in the morning." Although having seen some of those candystripers - you may decide not to fill the prescription.

    2. Re:Internet Filter by Ocker3 · · Score: 1

      I reject your reality and substitute my own

  7. I got ten bucks by Deagol · · Score: 1

    for the first person who applies a "fap" tag!

    1. Re:I got ten bucks by Nimey · · Score: 1

      I take Paypal.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:I got ten bucks by Deagol · · Score: 1

      And I only use cash.

    3. Re:I got ten bucks by TheLink · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah and it's DNA marked too I bet.

      --
  8. No worries, Slashdotters by Nimey · · Score: 1

    Masturbation works too.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
    1. Re:No worries, Slashdotters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally a medical advice I have no problems understanding the helpful "it's good for you!" part of.

  9. 90% ??? I call Bull. by MMC+Monster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    IVF has been around a few years. In fact, it's been around since 1978, if you want to take it back to the first test tube baby.

    I'm sure if there were "severe" chromosomal abnormalities we would have noticed by now.

    Now, I'm not saying that there isn't any increased risk of chromosomal abnormalities associated with the procedure. But 90% chance of severe chromosomal abnormalities doesn't sound like it makes sense to me.

    Are there are molecular geneticists in the house?

    --
    Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
  10. Whoo-hoo! by IonOtter · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, if frequent masturbation prevents cancer, then baby, lemme tell ya? I could CURE cancer. And now this?

    I just might start selling it, now?

    --
    [End Of Line]
  11. Re:90% ??? I call Bull. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm sure if there were "severe" chromosomal abnormalities we would have noticed by now.

    We have noticed. It is one of the reasons that multiple eggs are implanted, since so few of them are viable.

    This is related to why we have so many multiple births from IVF -- sometimes 2 or more of the implanted eggs are viable.

    Also note that IVF is done primarily when people have trouble conceiving normally, so incidence of abnormality should be high anyway... perhaps these abnormalities are part of the infertility issues that brought the patients to the fertility specialist in the first place.

    Someone I know very well has tried IVF twice... out of all the eggs that it was tried with (I think 6 or 8 each time), only one egg was viable... and that one miscarried during week 5.

    It's really not surprising to anyone who's been through it or has had frank discussions with someone who has.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  12. Fresher Sperm by corsec67 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It seems pretty simple to me: fresh sperm are better.

    --
    If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    1. Re:Fresher Sperm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, at least they taste better...

    2. Re:Fresher Sperm by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      You mean, more taste, less filling?

                -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
  13. On autism! by tjstork · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have an autistic son and I think that "causes of autism" are something that is used far too often. My wife and I have thought about this and we see in our son's autism some of our own traits as its forbears. Rather than the litany of plastic bottles, vaccines, carbon monoxide, indoor air pollution and other bogus causes, we now wonder if autism is actually part of a natural evolutionary response to dealing with an increasingly complex human society.

    Perhaps we've evolved to deal with the fact that we are increasingly specialized, as our society feeds back into our own natural selection, and, we've reached a sort of a tipping point where autism is the next step.

    We've been very fortunate in that our son has responded extremely well to aggressive therapy, all, by the way, provided by the taxpayer... (makes this old Republican rethink some of his own values). And, we wonder if, perhaps, a different sort of society might emerge from autism, that, we see it as a disability because we value our own communication so much. Perhaps autism is something that will never be cured, but, people who are autistic can move onto lead intelligent and productive lives if only there is intervention and ever better education and socialization for them and in a way that makes sense, for them.

    Regardless of all of that though, I can say this. I'm proud of my son for who he is. When I first heard of his diagnosis, I almost felt like he had died and I was very angry about it. Sometimes, I admit, I still am. But, overall, if I could do it all over again, and make a choice about having an autistic child, I would gladly keep the son that I have.

    I wouldn't trade him for anything in the world.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:On autism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      not even for a Klondike bar?

    2. Re:On autism! by Renraku · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, the next step in evolution is to be inept-by-default at communication? One of the reasons we're so advanced? I agree that some social customs are way too complex, and that people need to be more forthcoming in general, but those are more personal flaws than flaws with society.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    3. Re:On autism! by 93,000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not to be all Jenny Mcarthy on you, because I don't agree with her opinions on vaccinations, but many autistic kids benefit greatly from a gluten free diet. FWIW, I have no medical background other than that I happen to be celiac (which I know makes me inherently biased towards GF) and am a huge nerd who reads lots of boring research. Not implying that gluten is a 'cause', as you say, but just that the diet seems to work very well for many with autism. You've very likely heard of/explored that option, but thought I'd throw that out there just in case.

      I admire you very much for your honesty, particularly about your initial feelings about your situation. I'm very glad you are in a good place. I wish you and yours the best.

    4. Re:On autism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is a very interesting sci-fi book called Speed of Dark by Elizabeth Moon. The main character is autistic and its told from his point of view. He works with a group of other autistic programmers on pattern recognition software.

    5. Re:On autism! by orngjce223 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And I am proud of who I am (officially diagnosed, you insensitive clod!) - and, judging from the growth of forums such as Wrongplanet, the rise in Autism may be perfectly balanced with the rise in the prominence of the Internet. Over textual communication, nobody cares that you flap your hands, or that you can't keep eye contact without getting this weird fidgety feeling, or that you don't quite get anything until the second or third time.

      --
      Note: I was 13 when I wrote most of this. Take with several grains of salt.
    6. Re:On autism! by JordanL · · Score: 1

      I would just appreciate if scientists could explain whether autism is developmental or genetic. I haven't seen anything diffinitive either way.

    7. Re:On autism! by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      I assume you mean environmentally-caused or genetic? Because "developmental" and "genetic" are in no way whatsoever opposites of each other or mutually exclusive in the least. Even if you do mean environmental, it's a false dichotomy. Very little is entirely one or the other. It's completely possible that certain genes give you an increased proclivity towards autism, but environmental factors (which can include those before you're born) decide whether or not you really make it onto the spectrum, and how far.

      Disclaimer: I know very little about autism, but have read enough about nature vs nurture in general to know that the odds of it being entirely one or the other are very, very low.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    8. Re:On autism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry AC, you're very special too.

      Now go outside and play, in traffic.

    9. Re:On autism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah use the taxpayers money when it suits you and then turn your back when another child needs YOUR help. You, my friend, may or may not have a wonderful son. I don't know about that, but you are nonetheless a fucking douche. Two faced asshole.

    10. Re:On autism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Curious_Incident_of_the_Dog_in_the_Night-time
      The story is written in the first-person perspective of Christopher John Francis Boone, a 15-year-old boy living with autism in Swindon, Wiltshire. Although Christopher's condition within the autism spectrum is not stated explicitly within the novel, the summary on the book's inside cover or back cover (depending on the edition) describes it as Asperger syndrome, high-functioning autism or Savant syndrome.

    11. Re:On autism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps, but you still come off as a weird fuck, internet or no.

    12. Re:On autism! by Xenna · · Score: 1

      This pretty much tells the story:

      "The disorder is seen often in identical twins: different studies have shown that if one identical twin has autism then there is a 63-98% chance that the other twin will have it. For non-identical twins (also called fraternal or dizygotic twins), the chance is between 0-10% that both twins will develop autism. The chance that siblings will be affected by autism is about 3%."

      It looks partly genetic.

      http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/aut.html

    13. Re:On autism! by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      My son, our second child, has an austism diagnosis. Personally I think his difficulty with language and resulting early behavioral issues stem from him being too smart, his mum and older sister being too talkative, and me being too lazy.

      To clarify a little; as a toddler he didn't need any help with anything he could reach, he'd grunt and point for anything he wanted that he couldn't reach, and we'd play 20 questions to work out what he needed help with. But mostly he didn't seem to need or what our help so he avoided learning to communicate with us.

      I see a lot of myself in my son. I can usually guess what he's thinking, because that's what I would be thinking. I'm very strong in maths / spacial problem solving, and very weak in creating writing and communication skills. But when I was growing up I had 2 teachers for parents who encouraged me all the time. My son doesn't have that advantage mainly because me and my wife were always busy with work or entertainment and being so self sufficient he was never very demanding of our time.

      I wasn't surprised or angry by his diagnosis as I don't think it changed my understanding of who he is at all. I think his learning difficulties are more my fault for not knowing how to teach him, than the fault of any environmental agent or genetic disorder.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    14. Re:On autism! by Renraku · · Score: 1

      Autism has been around for a long, long time.

      It's just that no one really diagnosed it before the 1900s.

      Now every time a toddler babbles or talks to themselves, their parents think they have autism and demand that their doctor do something about it. Parents can be very convincing and many have resorted to lawyers to prove that they know more than the medical community.

      In contrast, a lot of psychs and doctors are more educated in things like autism, so they're more likely to find and diagnose real cases.

      I don't think that autism has gone up disproportionally.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    15. Re:On autism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand identical twins most often grow up in the same environment.

    16. Re:On autism! by tjstork · · Score: 1

      I wasn't surprised or angry by his diagnosis as I don't think it changed my understanding of who he is at all. I think his learning difficulties are more my fault for not knowing how to teach him, than the fault of any environmental agent or genetic disorder.

      The one thing about an educational diagnosis of autism, that you might have missed, is that your kid had no way to communicate at all. As it was explained to me, if they had given a deaf child or a blind child the same test as was given to my son, they would have seen compensating behavior to make up for the sensory loss. In the case of autism, you don't see that.

      There's something else going on besides environmental issues and how you raise your kid. There are so many other kids who have parents that really don't do anything that come out at least capable of communicating.

      While it can obviously be beneficial to ask if you are doing enough for your child, affixing blame to yourselves for his autism is something that could actually be more corrosive than it is worth. What good would it do your kid if your marriage fell apart because of finger pointing over his condition? Best to accept him for what he is, say, yeah, maybe you could do better, but, ultimately realize that his autism isn't your fault, but still get the best treatment you can.

      --
      This is my sig.
    17. Re:On autism! by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      My son was diagnosed with very-mild-autism when he was 3 years old.
      Instead of a series of drugs, our doctors prescribed an action course: no TV, all active plays, puzzles, and talking a lot to him.
      Now, at age 4 1/2, he as slowly come out of his shell and is talking normally at 80% efficiency.
      The doctors say he lags 6 months behind others of his age. His IQ is 90 for his age of 4 years.
      Of course he still is silent in school and does what he is told. His drawing skills are exceptional for his age and his teacher praises him sky-high for this.
      But he still has issues mingling with new kids.
      We checked for Lead poisoning, but nothing of that sort.
      His speech is still childish- meaning the words are not pronounced clearly. Doctors say it will go away only after constant practice.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    18. Re:On autism! by cluke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hence the comparison with non-identical twins. Not being genetically identical, the incidence of both being autistic drops greatly, despite the environment being the same.

      As you can imagine, twins (both varieties, identical and fraternal) are absolutely invaluable to medical research!

    19. Re:On autism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool Story bro.

    20. Re:On autism! by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong, I'm not judging myself. The point I was trying to make (remember, I'm a pretty poor communicator myself) is that I could have been in his shoes. If there's a genetic disposition, I've got it, maybe presenting as aspergers. But I didn't have the same environment as an infant / toddler, that's the biggest difference I see between myself and my son.

      For me growing up, maths was like breathing, english like squeezing blood from a stone.

      But I doubt austism has any single cause. I think a significant contributor to my sons diagnosis was how he dealt with frustration when he was unable to express what he really wanted.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    21. Re:On autism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's worth trying but the results seem really random. Random enough to make me think that there is a significant percentage of all humans that could benefit from a gluten and/or casein free diet, autistic or not.

      I'm in the spectrum but noticed no benefit to a gluten and casein free diet. In fact it was pretty bad because I have a hard enough time maintaining a healthy weight on a regular diet and the gluten-free diet made it completely impossible. Plus I just felt like crap. I did not notice any effect whatsoever on my autistic traits. I did it for about 6 months before going back to a regular diet.

    22. Re:On autism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second trying to eliminate common foods (such as milk, wheat, and nuts) that can cause allergic attacks or are poorly digested in some individuals. Not just for children with Asperger's, but for any child with behavioral problems. These sort of foods can cause a myriad of symptoms such as headaches and bodyaches that are chronic to the point that the person experiencing them may become accustomed to them and not realize they are experiencing a pain that shouldn't be there. These aches cause physiological and psychological problems since the body reacts to them with the same chemical responses of being physically hurt.

      It will take at least a couple of weeks of dietary changes before any improvements are visible (and that assumes your child sticks to the diet and does not swap items during lunch). You will want to see a doctor first before implementing a diet. There are no guarantees that a modified diet will result in any improvement, but it's worth a shot even if to eliminate the possibility.

      If your son has problems waking or falling asleep, try administering melatonin at night and light during the morning. Something like .3mg (or less) an hour before bedtime, and if he's still awake an hour and a half later, administer another. There's nothing like chronically waking up groggy to affect someone's personality and their performance in life.

      And yeah, having a lot of talkative family members could lead to someone being silent.. if they listen all the time without given a chance to speak. Try to find a social/family group for him with people who talk a bit slower and pause every once in a while so he is given an opportunity to express himself.

    23. Re:On autism! by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      This is a procedure that is performed for babies that are dead or dying in-utero as well.

      Do you have any statistics on what proportion of late-term abortions are medically-necessary vs. those that are 'just for moms who don't want kids'? My understanding is that virtually all of the late-term abortions done here are for pretty valid reasons, and they make up a tiny proportion of abortions as a whole anyway.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    24. Re:On autism! by IorDMUX · · Score: 1

      but many autistic kids benefit greatly from a gluten free diet.

      It... depends on your interpretation. There is just enough truth in that statement to make it thoroughly confusing.

      Psychological problems are diagnosed almost solely based upon symptoms (as you cannot test positive for the nonexistent a BPD bacteria or schizophrenia antibodies). As a result, a few select kids who actually have a digestive issue [preventing certain nutrients from being absorbed and presented to the brain], but no underlying brain architecture problems, are being diagnosed as "autistic".

      We are beginning to understand some of the 'wiring' differences in autism, such as reduced neural connectivity in certain high-level areas of the brain (which seems to result in an increase in connectivity within sub-sections), and even a larger-than-normal brain. An fMRI of an autistic brain shows clear and measurable differences in activity and excitation from a neurotypical brain. It is certain, however, that these changes to the brain structure begin in the womb and are permanent.

      What this boils down to is that, while a GF diet may aid in the treatment of a digestive/endocrine system-related condition which causes symptoms similar to autism, autism spectrum disorders (as defined by the re-wiring of the brain) cannot be treated quite so easily.

      --
      >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
    25. Re:On autism! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also have celiac, and while reading up on it I started reading about "enzyme therapy" and how autistic kids benefit from that as well as a gluten free diet. if you're curious you should check it out, just google for starters

  14. Re:90% ??? I call Bull. by tpjunkie · · Score: 1

    I guessed, and confirmed upon reading, that the linked article is referring to the fact that human embryos naturally have a high rate of genetic abnormalities, and thus the fact that not every copulation during a woman's fertile period results in a pregnancy. The article explains that newer, more thorough screening mechanisms are flagging embryos that previously went undetected.

  15. Re:90% ??? I call Bull. by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

    They pack plenty of eggs in there and still only get 30%-40%(if you trust numbers from US clinics selling IVF) and of those

    In 2008, an analysis of the data of the National Birth Defects Study in the US found that certain birth defects were significantly more common in infants conceived with IVF, notably septal heart defects, cleft lip with or without cleft palate, esophageal atresia, and anorectal atresia; the mechanism of causality is unclear.

    time for a back of the napkin calculation to not-really-but-sort-of prove my point:
    10%*7(couldn't find a number for how many they fill you up with, so i made one up)*50%(other factors and multiple pregnancies counting as one) ~=30-40%

    --
    IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
  16. Re:90% ??? I call Bull. by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

    so its really good news, and more good news (unless you wanted to use the original good news to wank more) as better screening can help increase the pregnancy rate from IVF without filling people up and risking multiple births.

    --
    IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
  17. Re:On autism! - Wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Well, unless your son is like 65 years old, then you and your wife have had a lifetime of exposure to these toxins, and you merely passed it on to him.

    Wise up and read the studies about toxic chemicals.

  18. Re:90% ??? I call Bull. by orngjce223 · · Score: 1

    time for a back of the napkin calculation to not-really-but-sort-of prove my point:
    10%*7(couldn't find a number for how many they fill you up with, so i made one up)*50%(other factors and multiple pregnancies counting as one) ~=30-40%

    I think they only put in three or four at most. The Octomom had more than twice the usual number implanted.

    --
    Note: I was 13 when I wrote most of this. Take with several grains of salt.
  19. So.... by reidiq · · Score: 0

    Don't have sex everyday = less chance to have baby. Take note /.'ers

    --
    Sig? No thanks. I don't smoke.
  20. Hmmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Could that explain why wankers seem to have more kids?

  21. Artificial insemination is more than just IVF by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    The summary ends by jumping straight from IVF to artificial insemination; those are two different (though overlapping) procedures. While IVF does essentially require artificial insemination to occur, artificial insemination can happen inside the uterus as well. Artificial insemination is a commonly employed technique for infertile couples who aren't willing, interested, or financially capable of undergoing IVF.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  22. that's what I've been telling my wife for years! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    however, drinking alcohol frequently and smoking damages sperm, no matter how often you "produce" sperm.

  23. Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm married, you insensitive clod!

    All joking aside, all technical reasons aside, I didn't RTFA, but.. did a study really need to show this?
    Barring no contraceptive;
    Copulation + Occasionally = Possible conception
    Copulation + Daily over 28+ (average) days = much higher chance of conception

    This took a major study, in which some scientist was paid?

    I'd sure love to be part of studies like this.
    Where do I sign up, and convince my wife it's necessary for science?

    1. Re:Seriously? by ninjapiratemonkey · · Score: 1

      I realize you didn't RTFA, but you could have read the fucking summary at the very least. Your complaints are based solely off of the headline.

      --
      01110000 01010111 01101110 00110011 01100100
  24. Re:90% ??? I call Bull. by JuzzFunky · · Score: 1
    I'm no molecular geneticist, but I am the proud father of a baby who was conceived through IVF. He shows no sign of chromosomal abnormalities (well, at least compared to his father).
    We were lucky. It only took us a couple of cycles - our first miscarried and we were told that it was almost certainly due to severe chromosomal abnormalities.

    "Less than 30% of conceptions result in a successful pregnancy" (TFA)

    I understand that statistic to mean that more than 70% of natural conceptions have chromosomal abnormalities so severe that the embryo fails to implant. I find it quite plausible that 90% of the embryos from people who are having trouble conceiving are flawed.
    Incidentally, It was recommended that we have sex every second day before my appointment with myself in the little room with the magazines.

    --
    Unexpect the expected!
  25. International Fertility Week by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

    I declare an International Fertility Week. Actually scratch that, it would probably also end up also being International Unintentional Denial of Service Week.

  26. Not entirely by parallel_prankster · · Score: 0

    There is a small report at the end of this article that seems to mention that the above headline may not be entirely true after all. But ofcourse, we are going to keep it to ourselves.

    1. Re:Not entirely by XnavxeMiyyep · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you look at the link to the so-called "refuting" article, it is about an entirely different topic, morning sickness. The text "oral" and "sex" do not appear in the article. The text "semen" appears, but only as a subset of the word advertisement!

      --
      I put the 't' in electrical engineering.
    2. Re:Not entirely by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Too late ;p

      Shouldn't have let us womin get edumacated - we can read to the end of the article all by ourselves.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  27. Having sex 9 times a fay also said to increase cha by Biswalt · · Score: 1

    Thank god! This puts to end the argument I'd been having a friend that thought peoplewho have almost no sex would have the highest fertility. I'll file this one under obvious theory ends up being right.

  28. Re:90% ??? I call Bull. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anything for MORE flipper Babies! Yay!

  29. great... by Noctris · · Score: 1

    so i am single AND extremly furtile ?

    1. Re:great... by Necroloth · · Score: 1

      so i am single AND extremly furtile

      I think you need to see a doctor about that...

    2. Re:great... by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Resisstence is futile?

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  30. sight by peas_n_carrots · · Score: 1

    So it doesn't really make you go blind?

    1. Re:sight by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Funny

      I domt thimk sp (why do they make the letters on keyboards so blurry nowadays).

  31. Re:90% ??? I call Bull. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As far as I know the multiple IVF egg implants are particular to the USA. My experience (Australia) is that having one egg is implanted each time is normal practice unless there are other significant factors. The success rate varies from clinic to clinic and ranges from 25% to 40% with one egg (from memory).

    Also as far as I know the morbidity of sperm in relation to frequency of ejaculation has been know for a considerable period of time. When my partner and I were going through IVF I was told to daily ejaculate for the month preceding the procedure (with a 3 day rest before the sample is taken).

    Wikipedia, is a good starting point in regards to sperm morbidity for anyone who is interested.
    Sperm
    Semen quality
    Semen Analysis

  32. Re:that's what I've been telling my wife for years by symbolset · · Score: 1

    however, drinking alcohol frequently and smoking damages sperm, no matter how often you "produce" sperm.

    Please pretend I filled this post out with the most ridiculous anecdotal evidence to the contrary, because I have one. Also, please don't give medical advice. Soda pop does not work as a contraceptive, and the medical term for teens who swear abstinence is "parents".

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  33. The best guidance for you then... by symbolset · · Score: 1

    Her place, always, and never give your right name.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  34. Cruel by slave_to_coffee · · Score: 5, Funny

    Posting this on Slashdot is like sending Pizza Hut circulars to Ethiopia

    1. Re:Cruel by dintech · · Score: 1

      Again proving that men all over the world like to "Hit the Hut", so to speak...

  35. Specially if you have sex with a woman... by viraltus · · Score: 1

    Or so I heard.

    --
    Dear /. CENSORS that set people's Karma to Neutral when you disagree with them: FUCK YOU!!
  36. I wonder how they phrased the ad. by bostei2008 · · Score: 1

    "After a week of daily ejaculations, the sperm was re-measured. "

    For this to make sense, they must have started out with men who don't ejaculate daily. How do you find those men?

  37. Sorry pal , its genetic by Viol8 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    "I think his learning difficulties are more my fault for not knowing how to teach him"

    Many people don't get taught properly when they're young. Then don't end up autistic. So I would suggest you get off your cross and accept his condition for what it is, not what you want it to be and pretend that in some way he might one day get better. He won't. Deal.

  38. Great news! by LizardKing · · Score: 1

    I'm just off to the office toilets with a copy of The Sun to "improve my fertility".

  39. some old science by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 1

    I remember reading many (>15) years ago a study about human sperm injected into chinese hamster eggs.
    The rationale is as follow: the DNA in human cells can be stained b a method called R banding or G banding, which , under the microcsope lets you look at the human genome - you can see something like 100 bands of dark and light, and there is a characteristic pattern; when you have large abnormalities, like an extra part of a chromosome, or a duplication, you see extra bands.
    This technique doesn't work on sperm, because the dna is "condensed" in the sperm head' and not stainable; the dna decondenses, and becomes stainable when the sperm enter an egg
    However, human eggs are hard to obtain (or harder then sperm) but you can use chinese hamster eggs; the human sperm enter the egg and the DNA becomes stainable.
    When you do this, you find that some (from memory) ~ 15% of human sperm have a visible defect.
    This staining technigue is quite crude - the human genome has ~ 2e9 base pairs of DNA, and you probably need something on the order of a change in 1e8 to see it with this stain, so if 15% are different by this stain....
    you could argue that the above is an artifact of the chinese hamster eggs, and that if human eggs were available, the sperm would apear better

  40. Sperm Helps Diminish Wrinkles by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2, Funny

    This article's advice to ejaculate every day would be an interesting combination with this article's suggestion that human sperm can help diminish wrinkles.

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  41. I wonder by anarkavre · · Score: 1

    Maybe the opposite is the reason for so many insane religious zealots.

    --
    "Without curiosity and knowledge, the mind is a vast void. Without the mind, curiosity and knowledge are nonexistent."
  42. Daily Sex Helps Improve by dhermann · · Score: 4, Funny

    Daily Sex Helps Improve

    ...everything.

    1. Re:Daily Sex Helps Improve by Bluebottel · · Score: 1

      As stated in the fucking article. Harr harr.

  43. Need your attention, FreedomIndia... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1287729&cid=28556345

    Couple points in there in regards to the "history of the Windows display engine" you might not have been aware of, & also, possibly more importantly, what is in my "p.s." there is a question I would like to ask you also... so, per my subject-line above? Thanks in advance for the reply there in that post!

    APK

    P.S.=> Sorry to disturb you here, otherwise - &, I hope your child comes thru, it sounds like he will (which is great - kids are the #1 redeeming feature of humanity imo), & especially because you're being a concerned + "take action" kind of parent, "apparently" (pun intended)... apk

    1. Re:Need your attention, FreedomIndia... apk by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your concern.
      I have replied to the GDI thread.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  44. Error in summary by DudeTheMath · · Score: 3, Informative

    TFA says it's 90% of embryos, not eggs. That makes a difference!

    --
    You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
  45. Scientific evidence for self satisfaction? by zazenation · · Score: 1

    I'll bet this new info will jack off---er--up-- Fleshlight sales....

  46. OT: Your sig by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

    P-III at 16Hz? (The H in Hz is a capital) Was that on the toys packaging, or what? Furthermore, its "I need" instead of "I needs".

    1. Re:OT: Your sig by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      P-III at 16Hz? (The H in Hz is a capital) Was that on the toys packaging, or what? Furthermore, its "I need" instead of "I needs".

      Its a CD my son turned up with. Its got some crap game on it. The system requirements are printed on the CD and they really do say 16hz. Just some stupid translation problem. Last night we watched a DVD of Zorro which my wife had picked up from somewhere. Soundtrack in mandarin, english subtitles derived from the soundtrack. Hilarious.

      Yes, there is a typo in my sig. Fixed. Thanks.

    2. Re:OT: Your sig by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      I guessed it was such a thing. Of course, you could massively underlock a P-III ;-)

  47. Yeah... sensationalize (lie) much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this headline were actually made by the scientists who did the research, it would be 'Regular Periodic Ejaculation Improves Sperm Motility in Males'. Not as exciting, huh? Doesn't mention SEX at all. How boring... the truth IS boring. Get over it. Go back to sleep, people.

  48. While... by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

    While I don't cheer the information, the frankness impresses me.

  49. Ironic... by bodland · · Score: 1

    Socks and bath towels aren't the best choice for procreation.

  50. It's so obvious by OrangeMonkey11 · · Score: 1

    Didn't any of these scientists learned this little fact in high school health class. Your man batter is not like wine, it does not get better with aged; so you have to clear it out regularly to get a health fresh batch.

  51. I've known this for years. Friends raise Horses. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've helped shoe horses for quite a while since maybe 2 years ago. Many of the horse ranches I've been to are run by all-women if not owned by a man. I'm not talking about mega-complexes like the ones run by a crazy man with 10,000 head or a dog-food corporation that has over 400 on the racks being "processed" (puke). I'm talking about little ranches and stable areas that have maybe 50 or less.

    On one such visit to one, I asked this friend of mine how her horses are all so docile when stabled next to in-heat mares and aparently she was "milking" the males daily just to appease them, and only uses the substance of 1 of the say 40 males to artificially fertilize the female. I've always thought this was a bad idea to diminish the gene-pool down to a breed of animals that were chosen for desirable attributes because this is a very shallow temporary observation that doesn't occur in nature; one day there may be mental syndromes discovered in relation to those "desirable" features. I've never met a beautiful buture in this regard, only butt-ugly ones. Anyways, back to the artificial ensemination, she even fertilizes the female horse with a large protractable vibrating phallus shaped to the same size of the male that the mare is expected to pair with. It might sound kind of a kink, but the mare horses actually do improve their ovulation when they are enseminated (even-better artificially) with an organ that stimulates them. You'll never hear about this on Discovery Channel. It seams like television always portrays horse ranches and cattle ranches as being a pre-dominantly male occupation of man, when in-fact there are more all-women ranches throughout USA.

    Continuing... I once visited this friend of mine when I was passing through and didn't call ahead of time. What I found her doing with the unused "undesirable" ejaculate of the other horses was filling a pot bath-tub in the horse stable and actually soaking herself in it. It would take her 40 studs twice a day for 2 months to produce over 30 gallon of ejaculate, and she was bathing in it. I'm not going to show any pictures, yet at 68 years-old she actually does have somewhat of a glowing aura about her that has always attracted all kinds of attention at the Auctions. Her skin is tight, not wrinkly, just an off-color that would suggest she were older and working in the sun.

    Anyhow, the more you know! Don't trust the elders beyond your 13th birthday; just move-out ASAP.

  52. Other retarded republicans? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    Really? Are you trying to say that you and other retarded republicans don't enjoy oral?

    Your comment is just one more reason to be thankful that I don't live in the U. S. of A.

    Then again, I wouldn't fit - not obese, don't vote along party lines like a sheeple, know the difference between capitalism and corporate welfare, between a democracy and an oligarchy, can find my country on a map, speak moe than one language, think gay marriage is fine and that God has no place in politics ... I just wouldn't fit in, neither with the "retarded republicans" nor the "retarded democrats" .... it's obvious neither party has the answers, just borrow and spend and blame everyone else and kick the can down the road for the next person to deal with.

    Thinking you can fix a debt problem by doubling the debt yet again in the next 5-1/2 years is what's retarded.