And of course FOIA may or may not cover this sort of information, but one day those memos will be FOIA material.
John Stockwell, former CIA agent, described the phenomenon of a "soft file". He had been a field agent, in half a dozen field offices, for his first decade or so in the CIA. His final field post being in Vietnam, just prior to the fall of the South.
Following his return from Vietnam he got a plum post, back in HQ, co-ordinating the CIA's 1975 Angola efforts.
This was during a period when the CIA was starting to get a lot of Congressional scrutiny. And the response to this was the destruction of a lot of official files -- together with the creation of unofficial "soft files". Since the soft files had no official existence they couldn't be subject to a normal subpoena ro FOIA request. The drawback to them was that your colleagues could only request a copy of them through word of mouth. But this drawback was worth living with if the contents would destroy your career, if subjected to outside scrutiny.
Should CIA employees keep soft files -- whose intent is to cover their tracks and deceive the American public? In my opinion absolutely not. CIA employees are supposed to carry out policies, not make them.
Is it then okay for Politicians to keep soft files? I dunno.
Your description of the improved Saturn V was interesting.
But you got the stories of the great chinese fleet and Perry expedition wrong.
Commodore Perry's mission opened up Japan, not China. Japan != China.
Archeological evidence that the great Chinese fleet circumnavigated the world? Here is an article with a map, showing they got as far as the Horn of Africa. A great accomplishment, but not world-girdling.
so, the facts you gave about the improved Saturn V? They are more accurate than those you offered on the history of maritime explorations?
I think that there is one other factor here that further muddies the conclusions you draw from your experience. I was a teaching assistant at University. My students had all come from high school with a A average, or an A+ average. As another correspondent noted, a big drop in their marks was a fairly common result.
I'd say the phenomenon you described -- being so smart you got away with doing little or no homework -- this too is not that uncommon. My anecdotal observation is that the kids who were regarded as so smart in high school that they got away with doing little or no homework found University much more of a challenge than less obviously brilliant kids. If you get to a good University there is a lot more competition for being the smartest kid in the class. It is a lot more work.
How does one get away with not doing homework in high school? Skim the text book at the beginning of the year, half pay attention to the teacher in class, count on being smart enough to be able to assimilate the material while writing the test or exam, rather than while studying or through doing homework?
I've known a couple of kids who attended gifted classes, who were very, very verbal, who were very articulate, had great vocabularies, who were able to coast on these skills, and practically never cracked a book. No, they weren't actually illiterate, compared with a kid with a normal IQ. But this imbalance of skills was extremely damaging for them.
They experienced the same kind of depression and difficulty coping that you described. Did they have ADHD too? Maybe. I don't know.
Somebody should have noticed their poorly balanced academic skills.
Mind you, serving as a teaching assistant further reinforced my distrust in grades as a good means of motivating students or a good means of really determining the true value of their knowledge, skills and wisdom.
Hmmm. Thukton could have said that the long, detailed document he links to claims that the.nu high level domain was stolen. It appears to be a document from a workshop held in Geneva by the International Telecommunications Union. The workshop was on "Member States experiences with ccTLD".
Efforts to increase GDP include the promotion of tourism and a financial services industry, although Premier LAKATANI announced in February 2002 that Niue will shut down the offshore banking industry.
Worth noting is that Tom Hanks little Island in Castaway was supposed to be "600 miles south of the Cook Islands". Niue is one of the Cook Islands.
When I was growing up people used to ask, "can I get a virus by reading my mail?" And the short answer was "No". A longer answer was, "No. To get infected you have to execute a program of some kind. e-mail is just data. It is not executable."
Then Microsoft announced plans to make the data files of its flagship applications executable.
They were warned. Security experts warned that this crazy innovation would allow vandals to infect Word files and to infect e-mail.
Microsoft ignored the warnings. And it wasn't long before the first Word macro viruses were seen in the wild. But, in the end, the e-mail viruses, that raided your address book, turned out to be much more expensive.
Why?
Why would a corporation with the public interest at heart introduce a suite of programs with such a fundamental design flaw?
Some wise man counselled, "Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by incompetence." I used to think that this bad design could be explained by incompetence on Microsoft's executive floor.
About a year ago I started to wonder about this. Gates and Ballmer started talking about security. Palladium. The Trusted Computing Platform. When I read about these schemes I realized that the explanation for Microsoft's terrible design choices could be part of a deep game. Make the internet an insecure place in the mid nineties? Reap the rewards by getting your victims^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hcustomers to welcome allowing you draconian control over their computers in the mid 00s?
[1] Hubble is popular, (but NASA doesn't have enough money...) [2] NASA sells Hubble (to someone who is a fan, or who thinks they can sell eye-candy pictures...) [3] ???
[4] Profit!
Seriously, when NASA thinks it has gotten everything from Hubble that it can afford, why not sell it? Make the buyer post a bond, to ensure they arrange for Hubble to crash controllably.
According to this list both John Lennon and David Bowie
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_who_ha ve_declined_a_British_honour">declined
a gong. Wow. Lennon was offered his then two decades before Sir Paul?
Steve Bourne calls them shell procedures not shell scripts. I figure since he created the shell named after him, he should know. So I call them that too.
FWIW, Sir Tim's gong, Knight-Commander of the Order of the British Empire is of higher precedence than Sir Mick's gong, as a
Knight Bachelor. I wondered whether Mick didn't get admitted to an Order because it might cheapen the experience for the existing members?
I strongly suspect that lazy technical writers neglected to explain why they insisted on a windows 95/98 boot disk. I strongly suspect that they needed a boot disk that left the computer in real mode. If this is the case then freedos, or any version of msdos or drdos would work.
If you think internet voting is unreliable, you really shouldn't trust internet polling. There is no authentication to make sure the poll isn't being spoofed.
Some years ago the provincial government here in Ontario decided to force the six municipalities that made up Metropolitan Toronto to amalgamate. The municipalities decided to hold a referendum. An widely publicized internet poll was conducted predicting that the public would vote strongly in favour of amalgamation. When the referendum was held, the public voted 4 to 1 against amalgamation.
I can't remember exactly how wildly off the poll favoured amalgamation. I think it was something like 2:1. So, the poll was off by a factor of 8. Wildly off.
I wrote:
Microsoft has a reputation for providing undocumented features within their OS that provide shortcuts that their own applications can exploit, thus making their applications artificially seem better than those of their competitors.
Anonymous coward wrote:
Your tinfoil hat insanity aside, this is pretty clever.
Hey Coward, it is well documented. If you had the courage to sign your name I would dig up some links.
Excuse me? It sounds like you are claiming to be a good citizen because, "I assure you that whenever I find an ashtray I alwais use it."
So, what do you do when you need a smoke, and you can't find an ashtray? You realize that, the way you phrased it, it sounds like you think it is okay, if you can't find an ashtray, to light up anyway, and throw your butts on the floor? Is this what you meant?
When I was young, and full of beans, I used to get into confrontations with people smoking in places where smoking was officially prohibited.
Smokers are addicts, and are capable of wild rationalizations. Anyhow, I would get my dander up, and engage in a tense confrontation -- mano a mano. By the time I was 20 or so I decided that I was putting my health at greater risk by confronting the asshole smoker -- maybe get a broken nose from getting in a fight.
About ten or fifteen years later I started speaking up again. But I did so in a totally different way. I'd ask them, in the nicest possible way, if they knew it was a non-smoking area. Sometimes smokers didn't know, they managed to remain unaware, and they stop.
But, if they don't stop, I don't appeal to authority. Instead I ask, as a courtesy, if they will stop out of consideration for those of us who are sensitive. While this is less effective than the tense confrontation approach I figure it is safer for me, because it won't provoke a fight.
I resent this. I shouldn't have to do this.
I am with blackrabbit on this issue. Even smokers who are capable of being decent people, good citizen, can be assholes when presented with temptation. They are in a non-smoking area, but there is no one else around, so they feel free to light up. Bzzzt. Back when we accomodated this destructive habit public places were designed to be well enough ventilated to clear away smoke. Well, they aren't anymore. And, if they once were, the ventilation has been turned down. If it is not a smoking area you are going to piss off non-smokers for for a considerable time after you have got your fix. If the ventilation is really bad, maybe for hours.
Let me close with an anecdote.
About fifteen years ago I was waiting to pick up my cousin at the airport. That part of the airport is under construction. The lounge is clearly a non-smoking area. Clearly marked with signs, no ashtrays present. And, because of the construction, it is very poorly ventilated. Well this older guy is standing next to a waste receptacle, having a smoke. So, I go over to him, and politely ask him if he is aware that this is a non-smoking area, and ask him, as a courtesy to refrain from smoking.
He denies it is a non-smoking area. He asks "if this is a non-smoking area, why are there ashtrays," as he points at his trash can. Maybe, from a distance, this trash can could be mistaken for an ashtray. But, when I said, "Sir, that is a trash can," its garbage bag lining was a sure clue that it was a trash can.
Then he says, "If this is a non-smoking section, why aren't there any signs?" So I silently point to a couple of the nearby signs.
When this has sunk in, he stubs out his cigarette, and says to me something like, "Okay, I am putting it out. But I am not doing so because of you. I am doing so because I am good citizen who obeys the law."
Although I did my best to talk to this guy in a way intended to not humiliate him, I am sure if you asked this guy what I had said he would have described me as being a complete asshole.
This guy's addiction blinded him to how ugly his behaviour was.
This guy's addiction blinded him so he could mistake a trash can for an ashtray. This guy's addiction blinded him so he could be oblivious to the many non-smoking signs in this lounge. This guy's addiction blinded him to not noticing that the room was crowded, poorly ventilated, and he was the only one smoking.
He probably was a good citizen -- except for his blindness over his addiction.
You want to be a good citizen? No rationalizations! Be considerate.
Although the vaccine does not reduce the cravings or withdrawal symptoms of quitting, it will reduce the rewarding effects of smoking.
So, if it was possible to administer the vaccine in a single dose, the subject goes through all the withdrawal essentially at once, with no possibility of sneaking a couple of smokes to take the edge off. That could be cruel. Is it possible that the multiple dose aspect is considered a feature, not a bug?
Most of Microsoft's R&D budget seems to be geared not toward producing innovative Microsoft products...
How much of Microsoft's R&D budget goes towards fucking up their competitors? Microsoft has a reputation for providing undocumented features within their OS that provide shortcuts that their own applications can exploit, thus making their applications artificially seem better than those of their competitors.
We all know of the long law suite over the booby-traps MS put into windows 3.1, so that it barfed when invoked from DR-DOS. It was dirty, dirty trick. It did not benefit the consumer. It hurt the consumer.
What if the MS developers whose job is to embed booby-traps were devoting their energy to actually making MS products better?
Introducing booby-traps into your products seems like a bd idea to me -- because they can get tripped at the wrong time. I have long suspected this is one of the reasons MS software is so fragile.
Has Vint Cerf accomplished anything useful in the last 20 years besides talking about how smart he used to be, promoting that stupid interplanetary network and announcing that Al Gore created the Internet because he, Vint Cerf, Father of the Internet, said so? I'm not even going to get into the question of what he did and didn't do way back when.
Hmmm. That is funny, when I read Cerf's defense of Gore he specifically disclaimed credit for fathering the internet. Nor did it seem to me he was giving Gore more credit than he was due. He backed up what Gore actually said he had done. Gore said he "took initiative" in creating the internet. Gore is a legislator. Anyone who is prepared to be fair will interpret Gore's statement -- uttered during an interview, not in an article -- as being that Gore "took legislative initiative". I believe the record was clear. Gore authored bills to pay for the creation of the internet. Look it up.
This is what us foreigners hate most about US domestic politics -- the willingness of the more partisan Americans to lie and distort what their opponents say.
It is called "smallpox" to distinguish it from the important one -- the one just called "pox". Otherwise known as syphillis.
In the movie "Dangerous Liaisons" Glenn Close's character is ostracized because she is a heartless troublemaker. In the original book she is stricken with "pox", aka syphillis, which was more virulent in those days, and caused horrible sores, and, eventually,
general paralysis of the insane.
On this page you will see a step in the conversion where they piled the components they removed on the roof of the bus, in order to simplify the comparison in which you are interested.
While the weight of the battery has to be added they are removing the transmission and replacing the original engine with a smaller one.
SafariShane needs to turn around and hack back in to the system in a week and show that the new company's security measures weren't that great.;-) This will ingratiate himself with the CEO and get the new company kicked out.
Shane, this sounds like a truly rotten experience. And some of the advice you have gotten here is pretty crappy too.
Before you consider taking revenge, do you think there is anyone in management or H.R. to whom you could have a conversation? The idea that management had had a sudden, abrupt reversal in their confidence in your ability and trustworthiness must be a disturbing one. Perhaps there is someone to whom you can turn to for some reassurance.
"I thought I was doing a good job. I did get a 12.5% merit increase in pay. But the secrecy around how my employment was terminated is disturbing. Is there something in the security report that will cause the firm to give future employers a less than enthusiastic endorsement of my skills? I'd like to know this."
You don't absolutely know the outside consultant's slagged your performance or trustworthiness. And, if I read your account correctly, you don't know that your former employers turned around and hired the consulting firm to replace you.
Slashdot Mirror
Someone should get one of the bright sparks who cancelled the old Star Trek, before its time, to tell Bush what a mistake that turned out to be. :-)
John Stockwell, former CIA agent, described the phenomenon of a "soft file". He had been a field agent, in half a dozen field offices, for his first decade or so in the CIA. His final field post being in Vietnam, just prior to the fall of the South.
Following his return from Vietnam he got a plum post, back in HQ, co-ordinating the CIA's 1975 Angola efforts.
This was during a period when the CIA was starting to get a lot of Congressional scrutiny. And the response to this was the destruction of a lot of official files -- together with the creation of unofficial "soft files". Since the soft files had no official existence they couldn't be subject to a normal subpoena ro FOIA request. The drawback to them was that your colleagues could only request a copy of them through word of mouth. But this drawback was worth living with if the contents would destroy your career, if subjected to outside scrutiny.
Should CIA employees keep soft files -- whose intent is to cover their tracks and deceive the American public? In my opinion absolutely not. CIA employees are supposed to carry out policies, not make them.
Is it then okay for Politicians to keep soft files? I dunno.
But you got the stories of the great chinese fleet and Perry expedition wrong.
Commodore Perry's mission opened up Japan, not China. Japan != China.
Archeological evidence that the great Chinese fleet circumnavigated the world? Here is an article with a map, showing they got as far as the Horn of Africa. A great accomplishment, but not world-girdling.
so, the facts you gave about the improved Saturn V? They are more accurate than those you offered on the history of maritime explorations?
I'd say the phenomenon you described -- being so smart you got away with doing little or no homework -- this too is not that uncommon. My anecdotal observation is that the kids who were regarded as so smart in high school that they got away with doing little or no homework found University much more of a challenge than less obviously brilliant kids. If you get to a good University there is a lot more competition for being the smartest kid in the class. It is a lot more work.
How does one get away with not doing homework in high school? Skim the text book at the beginning of the year, half pay attention to the teacher in class, count on being smart enough to be able to assimilate the material while writing the test or exam, rather than while studying or through doing homework?
I've known a couple of kids who attended gifted classes, who were very, very verbal, who were very articulate, had great vocabularies, who were able to coast on these skills, and practically never cracked a book. No, they weren't actually illiterate, compared with a kid with a normal IQ. But this imbalance of skills was extremely damaging for them.
They experienced the same kind of depression and difficulty coping that you described. Did they have ADHD too? Maybe. I don't know.
Somebody should have noticed their poorly balanced academic skills.
Mind you, serving as a teaching assistant further reinforced my distrust in grades as a good means of motivating students or a good means of really determining the true value of their knowledge, skills and wisdom.
But that is another story.
Is windex counter-indicated? Why?
Hmmm. Thukton could have said that the long, detailed document he links to claims that the .nu high level domain was stolen. It appears to be a document from a workshop held in Geneva by the International Telecommunications Union. The workshop was on "Member States experiences with ccTLD".
Worth noting is that Tom Hanks little Island in Castaway was supposed to be "600 miles south of the Cook Islands". Niue is one of the Cook Islands.
Then Microsoft announced plans to make the data files of its flagship applications executable.
They were warned. Security experts warned that this crazy innovation would allow vandals to infect Word files and to infect e-mail.
Microsoft ignored the warnings. And it wasn't long before the first Word macro viruses were seen in the wild. But, in the end, the e-mail viruses, that raided your address book, turned out to be much more expensive.
Why?
Why would a corporation with the public interest at heart introduce a suite of programs with such a fundamental design flaw?
Some wise man counselled, "Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by incompetence." I used to think that this bad design could be explained by incompetence on Microsoft's executive floor.
About a year ago I started to wonder about this. Gates and Ballmer started talking about security. Palladium . The Trusted Computing Platform. When I read about these schemes I realized that the explanation for Microsoft's terrible design choices could be part of a deep game. Make the internet an insecure place in the mid nineties? Reap the rewards by getting your victims^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hcustomers to welcome allowing you draconian control over their computers in the mid 00s?
[1] Hubble is popular, (but NASA doesn't have enough money...)
[2] NASA sells Hubble (to someone who is a fan, or who thinks they can sell eye-candy pictures...)
[3] ???
[4] Profit!
Seriously, when NASA thinks it has gotten everything from Hubble that it can afford, why not sell it? Make the buyer post a bond, to ensure they arrange for Hubble to crash controllably.
According to this list both John Lennon and David Bowie http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_who_ha ve_declined_a_British_honour">declined
a gong. Wow. Lennon was offered his then two decades before Sir Paul?
Steve Bourne calls them shell procedures not shell scripts. I figure since he created the shell named after him, he should know. So I call them that too.
FWIW, Sir Tim's gong, Knight-Commander of the Order of the British Empire is of higher precedence than Sir Mick's gong, as a Knight Bachelor . I wondered whether Mick didn't get admitted to an Order because it might cheapen the experience for the existing members?
Why windows 98?
I strongly suspect that lazy technical writers neglected to explain why they insisted on a windows 95/98 boot disk. I strongly suspect that they needed a boot disk that left the computer in real mode. If this is the case then freedos, or any version of msdos or drdos would work.
So, somebody should mod the parent up.
If you think internet voting is unreliable, you really shouldn't trust internet polling. There is no authentication to make sure the poll isn't being spoofed.
Some years ago the provincial government here in Ontario decided to force the six municipalities that made up Metropolitan Toronto to amalgamate. The municipalities decided to hold a referendum. An widely publicized internet poll was conducted predicting that the public would vote strongly in favour of amalgamation. When the referendum was held, the public voted 4 to 1 against amalgamation.
I can't remember exactly how wildly off the poll favoured amalgamation. I think it was something like 2:1. So, the poll was off by a factor of 8. Wildly off.
Hey Coward, it is well documented. If you had the courage to sign your name I would dig up some links.
So, what do you do when you need a smoke, and you can't find an ashtray? You realize that, the way you phrased it, it sounds like you think it is okay, if you can't find an ashtray, to light up anyway, and throw your butts on the floor? Is this what you meant?
When I was young, and full of beans, I used to get into confrontations with people smoking in places where smoking was officially prohibited.
Smokers are addicts, and are capable of wild rationalizations. Anyhow, I would get my dander up, and engage in a tense confrontation -- mano a mano. By the time I was 20 or so I decided that I was putting my health at greater risk by confronting the asshole smoker -- maybe get a broken nose from getting in a fight.
About ten or fifteen years later I started speaking up again. But I did so in a totally different way. I'd ask them, in the nicest possible way, if they knew it was a non-smoking area. Sometimes smokers didn't know, they managed to remain unaware, and they stop. But, if they don't stop, I don't appeal to authority. Instead I ask, as a courtesy, if they will stop out of consideration for those of us who are sensitive. While this is less effective than the tense confrontation approach I figure it is safer for me, because it won't provoke a fight.
I resent this. I shouldn't have to do this.
I am with blackrabbit on this issue. Even smokers who are capable of being decent people, good citizen, can be assholes when presented with temptation. They are in a non-smoking area, but there is no one else around, so they feel free to light up. Bzzzt. Back when we accomodated this destructive habit public places were designed to be well enough ventilated to clear away smoke. Well, they aren't anymore. And, if they once were, the ventilation has been turned down. If it is not a smoking area you are going to piss off non-smokers for for a considerable time after you have got your fix. If the ventilation is really bad, maybe for hours.
Let me close with an anecdote.
About fifteen years ago I was waiting to pick up my cousin at the airport. That part of the airport is under construction. The lounge is clearly a non-smoking area. Clearly marked with signs, no ashtrays present. And, because of the construction, it is very poorly ventilated. Well this older guy is standing next to a waste receptacle, having a smoke. So, I go over to him, and politely ask him if he is aware that this is a non-smoking area, and ask him, as a courtesy to refrain from smoking.
He denies it is a non-smoking area. He asks "if this is a non-smoking area, why are there ashtrays," as he points at his trash can. Maybe, from a distance, this trash can could be mistaken for an ashtray. But, when I said, "Sir, that is a trash can," its garbage bag lining was a sure clue that it was a trash can.
Then he says, "If this is a non-smoking section, why aren't there any signs?" So I silently point to a couple of the nearby signs.
When this has sunk in, he stubs out his cigarette, and says to me something like, "Okay, I am putting it out. But I am not doing so because of you. I am doing so because I am good citizen who obeys the law."
Although I did my best to talk to this guy in a way intended to not humiliate him, I am sure if you asked this guy what I had said he would have described me as being a complete asshole.
This guy's addiction blinded him to how ugly his behaviour was.
This guy's addiction blinded him so he could mistake a trash can for an ashtray. This guy's addiction blinded him so he could be oblivious to the many non-smoking signs in this lounge. This guy's addiction blinded him to not noticing that the room was crowded, poorly ventilated, and he was the only one smoking.
He probably was a good citizen -- except for his blindness over his addiction.
You want to be a good citizen? No rationalizations! Be considerate.
So, if it was possible to administer the vaccine in a single dose, the subject goes through all the withdrawal essentially at once, with no possibility of sneaking a couple of smokes to take the edge off. That could be cruel. Is it possible that the multiple dose aspect is considered a feature, not a bug?
How much of Microsoft's R&D budget goes towards fucking up their competitors? Microsoft has a reputation for providing undocumented features within their OS that provide shortcuts that their own applications can exploit, thus making their applications artificially seem better than those of their competitors.
We all know of the long law suite over the booby-traps MS put into windows 3.1, so that it barfed when invoked from DR-DOS. It was dirty, dirty trick. It did not benefit the consumer. It hurt the consumer.
What if the MS developers whose job is to embed booby-traps were devoting their energy to actually making MS products better?
Introducing booby-traps into your products seems like a bd idea to me -- because they can get tripped at the wrong time. I have long suspected this is one of the reasons MS software is so fragile.
Hmmm. That is funny, when I read Cerf's defense of Gore he specifically disclaimed credit for fathering the internet. Nor did it seem to me he was giving Gore more credit than he was due. He backed up what Gore actually said he had done. Gore said he "took initiative" in creating the internet. Gore is a legislator. Anyone who is prepared to be fair will interpret Gore's statement -- uttered during an interview, not in an article -- as being that Gore "took legislative initiative". I believe the record was clear. Gore authored bills to pay for the creation of the internet. Look it up.
This is what us foreigners hate most about US domestic politics -- the willingness of the more partisan Americans to lie and distort what their opponents say.
It is called "smallpox" to distinguish it from the important one -- the one just called "pox". Otherwise known as syphillis.
In the movie "Dangerous Liaisons" Glenn Close's character is ostracized because she is a heartless troublemaker. In the original book she is stricken with "pox", aka syphillis, which was more virulent in those days, and caused horrible sores, and, eventually, general paralysis of the insane.
While the weight of the battery has to be added they are removing the transmission and replacing the original engine with a smaller one.
" Was " being the key word. Tip was Speaker from January 4th 1977 to January 3rd 1987.
I thought he was Speaker of the House of Representatives. Wouldn't that make him a Congressman? But what do I know, I am just a foreigner.
Shane, this sounds like a truly rotten experience. And some of the advice you have gotten here is pretty crappy too.
Before you consider taking revenge, do you think there is anyone in management or H.R. to whom you could have a conversation? The idea that management had had a sudden, abrupt reversal in their confidence in your ability and trustworthiness must be a disturbing one. Perhaps there is someone to whom you can turn to for some reassurance.
"I thought I was doing a good job. I did get a 12.5% merit increase in pay. But the secrecy around how my employment was terminated is disturbing. Is there something in the security report that will cause the firm to give future employers a less than enthusiastic endorsement of my skills? I'd like to know this."
You don't absolutely know the outside consultant's slagged your performance or trustworthiness. And, if I read your account correctly, you don't know that your former employers turned around and hired the consulting firm to replace you.
Good luck.
Yes, the A.C. points to a good article. Now here is link that works.