Slashdot Mirror


Smallpox From The Past

An anonymous reader submits "Earlier this year, librarian Susanne Caro was looking through an 1888 book on United States Civil War medicine and discovered a small envelope labeled 'scabs from vaccination of W.B. Yarrington's children' and signed by Dr. W.D. Kelly, the author of the book. After a bit of research, she realized they might be smallpox scabs used in early live vaccination methods and contacted various officials including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The CDC was excited by the find, because it gives them an untreated specimen from over a century ago, and a chance to look at the disease's evolution. Although the FBI had concerns that the smallpox may have been planted in the book, most of the researchers believe the scabs are too old to be dangerous, and they fear they may not even be able to yield live smallpox."

211 comments

  1. Interesting by shawnywany · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds creepily like the beginning of a Robin Cook novel...

    1. Re:Interesting by fastidious+edward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't worry, sounds like no one else read it for ~130 years... probably wasn't a compulsive read.

      --

      karma karma karma karma karma chameleon, you come and go, you come and go.
    2. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Literally or figuratively?

    3. Re:Interesting by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      I doubt there are envelopes full of scabs even in the signed copies.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Interesting by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      It sounds like Jurassic Park too... albeit on a shorter timeframe. Find coagulated Small Pox, recreate small pox, small pox gone wild, disaster.

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    5. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "probably wasn't a compulsive read."

      Sounds like a Robin Cook novel..

    6. Re:Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds creepily like the beginning of a Robin Cook novel...

  2. I am glad I am alive today... by Azadre · · Score: 2, Funny

    Because I would hate to contract small pox just for working during a strike...

  3. uhh by nomadic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ok, the FBI thinks someone planted smallpox, in an envelope LABELLED with biohazard information, in a 19th century book, in Santa Fe. What the hell is wrong with them? I mean, that's just moronic.

    1. Re:uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Better safe from psychos than sorry?

      Seriously, I'm glad they consider it a possibility, and hopefully prove it wrong.

    2. Re:uhh by kfg · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Better safe from psychos than sorry?

      The FBI are psychos with badges though, it's tough to be safe from them.

      KFG

    3. Re:uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a psycho is my enemy, then my enemy's psycho, despite them being my psycho, is my temporary friend until they have served their purpose.

      --
      Eminem is art

    4. Re:uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why mod this insightful when there is this valid responce is left unanswered?

      Parent seemed little more than the knee-jerk lets make a semi-paranoid, semi-YROL themed post and get karma.

      I look forward to the day +insightful is only applied to insightful posts, and not to lowest-slashdot-common-denominator posts.

    5. Re:uhh by fastidious+edward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is because most mods, like most readers, browse at +2, therfore missing posts that need to be modded up and acting like sheep on posts that already have been.

      --

      karma karma karma karma karma chameleon, you come and go, you come and go.
    6. Re:uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, they were worried the story was
      a hoax by someone who wanted to create fear
      and panic.

      As you might recall, after the US was hit with
      a bioweapons attack (resulting in numerous
      deaths, and the shut down of the U.S. Senate
      offices), it become popular for people to
      "copy cat" the weapon. Soon, people were
      sending packets of white talc power in the
      mail with threatening notes, all in hopes of
      causing a panic and shutting down a business
      for a few days.

      As we've gotten used to this sort of ruse,
      and developed technologies to detect anthrax
      spores, the people trying to spread panic have
      gotten more clever.

      Consider, for example, how hard it would be to
      create panic by sending a note through the mail
      claiming that the envelope contained small
      pox. Since small pox is tightly controlled,
      and highly infectious, it's unlikely a group
      (other than a government) has a sample of the
      virus. So the hoax would quickly unravel.

      A clever person who wanted to create a plausible
      story about how a small pox virus came to be
      found in a public space might have to work
      harder. For example, they could make up a
      story about old medical samples, museum equipment,
      etc.

      And so in this case, it's entirely reasonable
      for the FBI to question the origin of this
      envelope. No, I don't think they started
      out by saying "This was planted by Al Queda."
      Instead, they started with a skeptical
      line of questions: who had the book? was it
      ever check out before? where was it kept?
      who had access to this text? is the person
      claiming to make the find a real librarian?
      etc.

      I think in this case, you, my friend, are the
      one who jumped to conclusions about the
      conduct of the FBI. Indeed, it would seem
      that your post exhibits the sort of haste
      and rush-to-judgement that you seek to
      condemn.

    7. Re:uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a friend of mine in another federal law enforcement organization once told me - FBI stands for F***ing Bunch of Idiots.

    8. Re:uhh by niko9 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They are just trying to rule out all the possibilites, and it doesn't hurt to just ask. And if it was found that there was some funny buisness going on you would be the first Monday morning quaterback.

      Never assume anything, stranger things have happened.

      And you comment was modded up +5? This place shold be called the Neverdot Ranch for christs sake.

    9. Re:uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I browse at +4...

    10. Re:uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Part of the reason they wanted to investigate who might have had the book before is to trace down the possibility of an infection. Consider these scenarios:
      1. A library patron becomes infected after borrowing the book, without their knowledge, and causes a plague.
      2. Al Queda sends out sympathizers to libraries, medical museums, and other storage facilities to find possible specimens, just like this book contained.
      3. A person with a little medical training and a lot of bills to pay decided to collect a few specimens, like those found in this book, and sell them to terrorists (even if the viruses are not live, or are not likely to cause an infection--just so they can scam some money, and the terrorists have a good 'panic' weapon, even if it's not effective).
      4. What if the book mentioned that there are five specimens, and the envelope only contained one... What would you make of that? Is it worth, oh, asking if the librarian took a few for her own private collection? Or if a patron who borrowed the book took some for sale on the black market?

      Don't you think that these scenarios warrant a half hour's worth of questions for the librarian about who had the book? Or do you just take everyone at their word?
    11. Re:uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I guess you'll never see any of your own comments.

    12. Re:uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Three cheers for the USA's foreign policy.

    13. Re:uhh by mabu · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, they were worried the story was
      a hoax by someone who wanted to create fear
      and panic.


      In addition to "Fair and Balanced", I believe Fox News has "Fear and Panic" copyrighted. Watch yourself or you could get sued.

    14. Re:uhh by nomadic · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're missing the point entirely. Their first act was to ask who had the book. They then put the envelope in a PAPER BAG and MAILED it to a laboratory? What kind of idiocy is that? The first thing they should have done, is quarantine the envelope. Then they should have asked who came into contact with it in order to make sure nobody was infected. Asking whether a borrower could have planted it is just kind of dumb. They should use common sense, just like every other damn law enforcement agency out there. I'm sick of these idiotic conclusions the agents immediately draw (think Wen Ho Lee).

    15. Re:uhh by catbutt · · Score: 1

      They didn't "think" it, they simply asked. And if they hadn't asked, they should have been fired for incompetency. Geez, it's friggin smallpox, not exactly your everyday thing.

    16. Re:uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you are logged in you see your own comments regardless of the threshold

    17. Re:uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHY THE FUCK DO YOU HAVE TO BREAK YOUR COMMENT LIKE THAT RETARD. I CAN'T BE BOTHERED TO READ IT NOW. ARE YOU TRYING TO IMITATE OUTLOOK EXPRESS'S 72 LINE BREAK???

      FUCKING RETARD.

      1111111111!!!!!!!!! !!!11111!!11 1!!! 1 11! 1 11 1 ! 11 ! !! 11 11 !!11!!!!!!1111 1 111111 1 !!!1!1! !!! 1 !1 11!! ! !!!! 11!!! !!!11111! !!! !1!!11!!! !1!111!1 !! !!!11111

    18. Re:uhh by JK+Master-Slave · · Score: 1

      You watch too much X-Files, man.

    19. Re:uhh by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 0, Troll

      Actually, they do. The surveys they conducted proved that the average Fox viewer could not understand words as long and complictaed as 'balanced'.

      -Charlie

    20. Re:uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trademarked, not copyrighted. You cannot claim a copyright on a word. It's what trademarks are for... Ah why bother, it's not like anybody on /. would ever be interested in starting to use the correct terminology.

    21. Re:uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to get picky, shouldn't it be a service mark and not a trademark?

  4. fear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
    they fear they may not even be able to yield live smallpox

    is this a bad thing?? I'd feel better knowing that no remnants of the virus were able to survive that long.

    1. Re:fear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had read the article (or even the slashdot summary), you would see that they wanted to see how the disease has mutated over the years.

    2. Re:fear? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had considered what the poster was suggesting, you would come to the conclusion that they do not want them to be able to harvest it for study. They do not care if they can study the evolution of the virus, they would much rather it be destroyed. Whether or not this is good or bad is not the topic of discussion, so don't babble to me about it.

    3. Re:fear? by Slur · · Score: 1

      They'll likely try to culture some smallpox to get more material for the comparison. If they can't culture any of the old stuff they may still be able to cross the genetic material of the antiquated and modern strains - perhaps creating a super mutant strain - mua-ha-ha-hahaha!

      --
      -- thinkyhead software and media
  5. scabs by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 5, Funny

    About the only time you will find scabs in a book and be excited about it. Mostly you'd say "Ok, I'm only going to buy NEW from now on".

    graspee

    1. Re:scabs by MadBiologist · · Score: 1

      Hello... Amazon? I found a scab in my book...

      --
      'Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?'
    2. Re:scabs by svanstrom · · Score: 3, Insightful
      About the only time you will find scabs in a book and be excited about it. Mostly you'd say "Ok, I'm only going to buy NEW from now on".


      Anthrax in envelopes you didn't expect is one thing, although not easily avoided you can minimize the risks in such situations; but picture terrorists selling things with anthrax in them on sites such as ebay and amazon.com.

      They might not be able to target the people they want, but they could reach 1'000's of people and completely ruin the business of selling used things online.

      Suddenly anyone could be a target of a terroristattack...
      --
      perl -e'print$_{$_} for sort%_=`lynx -dump svanstrom.com/t`'
    3. Re:scabs by timepilot · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah but they would get some hairy negative feedback.

    4. Re:scabs by musingmelpomene · · Score: 1

      Shhhh! Be quiet, or everyone else will want one, too.

    5. Re:scabs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Horrible eBayer, gave my whole family smallpox, DO NOT RECOMMEND!!!!!!!!!!!!"

    6. Re:scabs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, excellent comment!

    7. Re:scabs by svanstrom · · Score: 1

      maybe I'm just in a bad mood, but I don't find it to be funny that a user gets a bad review for killing the buyers of his goods.

      --
      perl -e'print$_{$_} for sort%_=`lynx -dump svanstrom.com/t`'
    8. Re:scabs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fear monger. God. Why the fuck would they bother doing that? They could just as easily walk around a city and DUMP the shit on people.

      Jesus Christ.

    9. Re:scabs by ar1550 · · Score: 1

      Would that mean the end of those aweful singing-and-dancing eBay commercials?

      --
      I once shot a man in Reno 'cause they cancelled Firefly.
    10. Re:scabs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      picture terrorists selling things with anthrax in them on sites such as ebay

      Awful, isn't it...

    11. Re:scabs by svanstrom · · Score: 1
      Fear monger. God. Why the fuck would they bother doing that? They could just as easily walk around a city and DUMP the shit on people.


      I know that this is just a troll trying to get some attention, but I want to show why he's wrong...

      When walking around dumping "the shit" on people they would reveal themselfs, whatever it is they're "dumping" they would get it themselfs and it would be limited to a singel event.

      Such a thing would be great if they want to target a certain group of people, let's say hitting a stockmarket, but it'd just be a one time event that wouldn't scare Average Joe enough to disturb his normal life.

      Attacking people via ebay etc OTOH would make a lot of people all over the world scared, it would ruin businesses no longer daring to buy things online, and it would ruin businesses which no longer can sell things online.

      By using a slower method like that they could also use something which doesn't kill the target more or less instantly, meaning that they could continue doing it for much longer before the world finds out; and when the people does find out the terrorists could be long gone.

      So... using ebay instead of "dumping" it on people would result in more deaths, would scare average joes a lot more (since they're the target), would be more or less global and they wouldn't die/be caught as easily; they wouldn't even have to be on the same continent as the country they're targeting... a french operative could focus on the US, someone in the US england, someone in england france and so on...
      --
      perl -e'print$_{$_} for sort%_=`lynx -dump svanstrom.com/t`'
    12. Re:scabs by bonzomcgrue · · Score: 2, Funny

      It could be worse...

      • You're at Pizza Hut, dining from their all-you-can-eat salad bar, singlehandedly trying to put them out of business with your furious consumption of iceberg lettuce, shredded carrots, and (low fat) ranch dressing. You're almost looking at the bottom of your bowl after your fourth trip, when you notice something in mired in the dressing below. Still chewing, you fish an envelope from the bowl and using the side of your fork you scrape the dressing off the paper. In runny ink, you read "scabs from vaccination of W.B. Yarrington's children"...
    13. Re:scabs by MadBiologist · · Score: 1

      That'd be a rather old Pizza Hut salad ba....Wait, I see your point.... Truely

      --
      'Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?'
    14. Re:scabs by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      First, "themself" is not even close to a real word. If you're trying to do a cockney accent, don't.

      Second, reveal themselves? How the hell would you know who gave you smallpox when you show up in the E.R. two weeks later? I can't even guess who picked my pocket last summer in Puerto Rico, how am I supposed to tell who gave himself smallpox and then coughed on me?

      And ruining the GDP by shutting down eBay? I guess Osama's cousin Akbar in Clevland isn't exactly the Mossad, but I think even Akkie can figure out that keeping people from leaving their houses is a hell of a lot more ruinous to business than making people switch from eBay to Amazon.

      To be honest, using eBay to spread anthrax in particular might work better than spreading it on the street, since anthrax is about as contagious as colon cancer, but if you're a multinational terrorist network, you're better off blowing up a few more embassies with your time. Spending a week selling anthrax-dusted Beanie Babies on eBay two kill two old ladies in Minnesota isn't really getting your money's worth.

      I mean, if you want to give somebody a difficult to contract, non-contagious disease with a 5% fatality rate why the fuck did you pick a disease? Just send somebody a box with a bottle of acid. At least there you have a better than 5% chance that some idiot will open it and melt his face off.

    15. Re:scabs by eatdave13 · · Score: 1

      This is why people find it difficult to hang out with you.

      --
      "Verbing weirds language." -- Calvin
  6. Forget smallpox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's largepox you should be afraid of.

    1. Re:Forget smallpox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LMAO!

    2. Re:Forget smallpox by geoswan · · Score: 1
      It's largepox you should be afraid of.

      It is called "smallpox" to distinguish it from the important one -- the one just called "pox". Otherwise known as syphillis.

      In the movie "Dangerous Liaisons" Glenn Close's character is ostracized because she is a heartless troublemaker. In the original book she is stricken with "pox", aka syphillis, which was more virulent in those days, and caused horrible sores, and, eventually, general paralysis of the insane.

    3. Re:Forget smallpox by eatdave13 · · Score: 1

      So the sane were safe then?

      What a strange disease.

      --
      "Verbing weirds language." -- Calvin
    4. Re:Forget smallpox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is called "smallpox" to distinguish it from the important one -- the one just called "pox". Otherwise known as syphillis.

      It should perhaps be noted that despite the names, the two diseases are not related.

      Syphilis is caused by a bacteria, not a virus like smallpox.

  7. yes, yes, YES by Boo5000. · · Score: 1

    it is all going according to plan...

    ::DISCLAIMER::
    OK, OK, this is totally just a joke, and I really don't think I should have even posted it. Its a joke, I repeat, A JOKE.

    1. Re:yes, yes, YES by Ledora · · Score: 1

      There he is.... Get him!

    2. Re:yes, yes, YES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hah?

    3. Re:yes, yes, YES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get the door, would you?

  8. Watch those libraries!! by Fruny · · Score: 4, Funny

    One more reason to have the government tightly control what books you check out.
    Libraries are a breeding ground for terrorists, I tell you.

  9. What Could Happen by hao2lian · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey, are these raisins? *munch*

    --
    Pelé!
  10. In a freezer? by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the article:
    the envelope rests in a freezer at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, awaiting a battery of tests.

    Yes, after lying in a library book for 115 years I can see why is important that it be frozen now.

  11. It's like a time capsule by mcc · · Score: 4, Funny

    What a wonderful idea for a time capsule that would be. Create a time capsule to be opened in hundreds or thousands of years and place in it some of the diseases which may have died off by then and which the generations of the future will not have had the chance to enjoy.

    Infectious disease: The gift that keeps on giving.

  12. clever al Qaida by tuxette · · Score: 2, Funny
    Within days, two FBI agents visited the Santa Fe library to pick up the scabs. They questioned a surprised Caro for half an hour, asking who had last used the book and whether she felt the borrower may have "planted" the scabs inside

    Yep. With all that Arab oil money they are funded with, al Qaida has invented a time machine, gone back to 1888, and planted smallpox in a book they know some woman in the future will pick up and read.

    --
    People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
    1. Re:clever al Qaida by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, what would you have them do instead? Take everyone at their word, and assume every report of possible smallpox viruses are true (leading to a shutdown of the business, as a level 4 biohazard team scrubs the area)? This gives tremendous power to the people creating hoaxes.

      Look, they talked to the lady for half hour. Part of their questions involved who had the book before the discovery. This is, on its face, a very, very important question, in case someone decided to take some samples of the virus for their own private use, or sale on the market.... So "hoax" was not the only concern the FBI had.

      But it would seem that even a half hour of asking questions about a possible fucking smallpox release that could kill tens of millions is just tooooo much for you to take.

    2. Re:clever al Qaida by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      Didn't I see that in a movie? The Arabinator. Big guy, said "I'll be back -- with my camel!"

  13. Yuk! by nicku · · Score: 1

    I was just eating lunch when this story came up...and lunch almost came up with it...nice timing...

    1. Re:Yuk! by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      Oh thanks for putting that image in my head. Now I need to go change my tshirt and get a new keyboard.

    2. Re:Yuk! by Ignis+Flatus · · Score: 1

      Ugh, you stole my subject line. I couldn't help but think that by 2103, some librarian will find a collection of old cigar boxes from Mrs. Pennington's 1973 first grade class full of chewed crayons and uneaten boogers. Imagine the excitement of 22nd century cootie researchers.

    3. Re:Yuk! by JK+Master-Slave · · Score: 1

      Speaking as an eBay seller who buys big lots of stuff from estate auctions to root through.... you're not that far off sometimes.

  14. Virus are on Border of living and Dead Matter ... by leoaugust · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1. virus -- ((virology) ultramicroscopic infectious agent that replicates itself only within cells of living hosts; many are pathogenic; a piece of nucleic acid (DNA or RNA) wrapped in a thin coat of protein)

    In viruses, which represent the border between living and dead matter, there are simpler aggregates between nucleic acids and proteins. A virus can be said to be genetic material without a cell of its own, and the structure of viruses can provide clues to the more complicated organisation of the hereditary material in higher organisms.

    Virus represent the border between living and dead matter. I thought that it meant that when the virus came across a host cell it could inject its DNA and multiply and that is why it is living , and when it didn't it just lay dormant i.e. it was dead matter. Wasn't the whole premise of Jurrasic Park based on this notion ?

    But in the article it says ....

    Several years ago in Kentucky, she said, a construction crew unearthed a metal coffin containing the mummified corpse of an apparent smallpox victim that researchers traced to the mid-1800s. The CDC checked the tissue for live virus and came up empty.

    There's also a slim chance, researchers say, that the scabs could yield live smallpox virus -- believed to reside in only two laboratories in the world -- and provide valuable information on the deadly plague.

    If the virus is nothing but the DNA and a protein coating around it, why are the people wanting it to be live ?

    Am I missing something ? What am I missing ?

    --
    To see a world in a grain of sand, and then to step back and see the beach where the sand lies ...
  15. Re:News just in: 25,000 niggers die in Iran! by tuxette · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Iranians aren't Arabs. In fact, if anyone can be called "Aryan," it's the Iranians.

    --
    People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
  16. Too old to be dangerous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They say the same thing about 'Grandpa' Al Lewis, but we know better.

  17. No, no, the saying is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    be afraid of large women. Only marry small women my mother always says.

  18. Re:News just in: 25,000 niggers die in Iran! by fastidious+edward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Well said, sir. There comes a time when one must forfeit karma to trolls.

    --

    karma karma karma karma karma chameleon, you come and go, you come and go.
  19. Re:Virus are on Border of living and Dead Matter . by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

    Because if you had a sample of Smallpox from 1888 or so you could compare it to the one in the vault and see if there have been any changes in the DNA. Some Virii change over time more than others.

    --
    Erlang Developer and podcaster
  20. WHO Spoke too Soon? by Mikkeles · · Score: 3, Funny

    I guess the World Health Organization's crowing about smallpox eradication was a bit too early!

    --
    Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    1. Re:WHO Spoke too Soon? by jon787 · · Score: 1

      Anyone who thinks that the CDC (and their equivalents around the globe) don't have a small frozen supply, seriously needs to take a moment and think. There are plenty of reasons to keep a small amount of any disease causing agent around.

      I would expect them to have a small supply of every disease causing agent they can get their hands on. It only seems prudent.

      --
      X(7): A program for managing terminal windows. See also screen(1).
    2. Re:WHO Spoke too Soon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, obviously they're only crowing about in-the-wild smallpox. Everyone knows it's been kept around in labs.

      Though if someone would've got infected from this and spread the disease again, then the crowing righss might've been lost...

  21. Re:News just in: 25,000 niggers die in Iran! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think that is why parent said "The people of Iran are more closely related to central europeans than either the afro-americans or arabs, and many of them in the north could easily pass for German"

  22. Re:Virus are on Border of living and Dead Matter . by Slowping · · Score: 4, Informative


    If the virus is nothing but the DNA and a protein coating around it, why are the people wanting it to be live ?

    Am I missing something ? What am I missing ?


    They are probably referring to whether or not the DNA information is sufficiently in-tact. If the DNA is too far destroyed, the virus probably won't be able to reproduce itself even after infecting a live cell.

    --
    (\(\
    (^.^)
    (")")
    *beware the cute-bunny virus
  23. "Live" virus by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 4, Informative

    In this context, "live" virus is able to infect and reproduce. "Killed" virus has been damaged to the point that it cannot infect a cell. Hence the concern over using "live" virus vaccines - the vaccines use a damaged or weakened virus that the body can easily defeat - but occasionally a few full strength particles get through and trigger the disease instead of vaccinating against it. "Killed" virus vaccines use fragments of destroyed viruses, ensuring you can't get sick from them, but possibly not as effective as the live kind.

  24. Re:Virus are on Border of living and Dead Matter . by dustman · · Score: 2, Informative

    If the virus is nothing but the DNA and a protein coating around it, why are the people wanting it to be live ?

    Am I missing something ? What am I missing ?


    I think they just mean viable, not really "live", since "live" has a weird meaning for a virus. If they couldn't find live virus samples, then either the virus wasn't there, or it was, but is now "dead", in the sense that it can't work anymore.

    True, viruses are just dna and protein, or something like that... Collections of complicated chemicals, basically. They can still degrade, given enough time. Heat them up enough, they will "die", by having their molecules scrambled, etc...

    But, IANAChemist, nor a biologist, so take my words with a grain of salt.

  25. They should make an action figure out of her by rumpledstiltskin · · Score: 1

    Just like Nancy Pearl

  26. Re:News just in: 25,000 niggers die in Iran! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many Arabs are Semites.

    Most Semites are Arabs.

  27. Misleading statement in article by mesocyclone · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's also a slim chance, researchers say, that the scabs could yield live smallpox virus -- believed to reside in only two laboratories in the world

    Only the naive believe that live smallpox exists in only two labs in the world. A more accurate statement in the article would have been "only legally allowed in two labs in the world."

    There is strong reason to believe that North Korea has the virus. France is also believed to have it. Iraq may have had it up until recently, as it was endemic in the region in the late sixties, and just a few scabs in a refrigerator would have been enough. It used to be common practice for scientists and doctors to keep a bit of smallpox in the fridge when they gathered it from patients. Hence there could be samples, possibly not even labelled or known to the owners, in a number of places in the world.

    One reason that the plan to destroy all stocks at the CDC and the official Russian lab was the realization that rogue countries probably had the virus, and hence destroying it would damage future defense attempts.

    Furthermore, the USSR and later Russia maintained stockpiles of 20 tons of weaponized smallpox in the eighties (authorized by Gorbachev) and probably to the present, and loaded it into missile warheads. Furthermore, a number of their scientists have since emigrated to other countries. In 1994 a number visited North Korea for unknown reasons. One former Soviet BW officieal entered into a deal with Iraq to sell 5000 liter fermenters.

    And then we have accidental discoveries like these scabs. Smallpox can survive in scabs for a long time, although >100 years is stretching it.

    --

    The only good weather is bad weather.

    1. Re:Misleading statement in article by wsherman · · Score: 1
      ...rogue countries probably had the virus, and hence destroying it would damage future defense attempts.

      Yeah, like it's going to be hard to get a culture once a bunch of people are infected.

      The only situation where already having the culture would make a difference would be in some kind of bio-weapons arms race where there was the threat of use but not actual use. The thing is, nukes are way more effective weapons than bio-weapons (you can't quarantine nukes, nukes don't require exact weather conditions, nukes are harder to shoot down, etc.) so there's no point in a bio-weapons arms race.

      North Korea would be like "We've got enough smallpox that if we could somehow magically deliver it half way around the world in just the right dosage we could kill thousands of people in a couple of your major cities." and the USA would be like "We've got enough nukes loaded on ICBM's that we can level your entire country in a matter of hours."

  28. Re:Virus are on Border of living and Dead Matter . by DocDendrite · · Score: 2, Informative

    But, IANAChemist, nor a biologist, so take my words with a grain of salt

    Well, I am a Biologist and your answer is right!

    The basic unit of life is the cell. Anything subcellular is not considered "alive" by scientific standards.

    -DD

  29. Yes lets all by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

    Grow a dangerous desease and see how it affects people... Oops, seems like its spreading everywhere... "my bad"

    1. Re:Yes lets all by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      Grow a dangerous desease and see how it affects people... Oops, seems like its spreading everywhere... "my bad"

      At first glance, I thought your post was going to read:

      1. Grow a dangerous disease and see how it affects people...
      2. ???
      3. PROFIT!

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  30. Bioweapons will be used in WWIII (2006-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's a widely believed fact that bioweapons and extensive use of tactical nuclear weapons will be used in WWIII that is due to begin in 2006-2007.

    Russia, China and the Arabs will unite. New York will be devastated by two small nuclear devices and while USA isolates itself to deal with the trauma, China invades Asia and Russia pushes into Western Europe.

    1. Re:Bioweapons will be used in WWIII (2006-) by mesocyclone · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's a widely believed fact that bioweapons and extensive use of tactical nuclear weapons will be used in WWIII that is due to begin in 2006-2007.
      Russia, China and the Arabs will unite. New York will be devastated by two small nuclear devices and while USA isolates itself to deal with the trauma, China invades Asia and Russia pushes into Western Europe.


      Could you pin down the dates a little more, old chap? I need to get my planning in order and know when to go hide.

      Thanks!

      --

      The only good weather is bad weather.

    2. Re:Bioweapons will be used in WWIII (2006-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Certainly, my friend (See this for full analysis):

      It can be seen that around 28.8.2006, Mars, Sun and Venus will be in Leo. This could be the time of the appearance of the Arab prince or the time when the attack against Italy will start. This timing coincides well with the timing of WW-III derived from other sources and using other methods as described in this page.

      You might also want to know that:

      Only one country at the end of the world, surrounded by great seas, as big as our Europe [Australia?], will live in peace, without any troubles....
  31. Homeland Security Issues Alert by moehoward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Tom Ridge will claim that we now need to ban books in order to be more "secure".

    The FBI needs to get a life if they were at all concerned about this. How embarassing. Morons. Everything is "terrorism" until proven otherwise. My god.

    --
    "If you want to improve, be content to be thought foolish and stupid." - Epictetus
    1. Re:Homeland Security Issues Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Shut the fuck up.

      We're better off with the homeland security than wityhout. How exactly have your civil rights been limited? Can't give an example? That's what I thought...

    2. Re:Homeland Security Issues Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My rights to put my genital scabs in library books has been ripped away from me!

    3. Re:Homeland Security Issues Alert by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      It's called "job security"

    4. Re:Homeland Security Issues Alert by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      Can't give an example? That's what I thought...

      Yes, I can't give any examples, because Homeland Security forbids it.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    5. Re:Homeland Security Issues Alert by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      In the UK, they already have!

      As I understand it, their latest attempt at an 'anti terrorism' law makes it an offense to possess information which may be useful to a terrorist.

      See? The Brits have banned *all* knowledge.

      Beat that Mr.Ridge!!! :-P

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  32. Studying undisturbed specimines. by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

    I recall a study a while ago that was requesting old pairs of binoculars so that they could measure the air inside for pollutants as it could be used to determine air quality from years past.

    Btw: This 'finding' does seem like a need beginning to a bad horror movie.

    1. Re: Studying undisturbed specimines. by bezuwork's+friend · · Score: 1

      I also recall this idea coming up when several lead coffins were discovered. Unfortunately, in the case I recall, either there had been contamination, or the results were inconclusive.

  33. Mod parent up as dangerously funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent up! Funny please.

  34. Seems like a strange thing to fear. by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    "most of the researchers believe the scabs are too old to be dangerous, and they fear they may not even be able to yield live smallpox."

    Damn! No virus we spent the last century trying to erradicate -- I've pissed myself in fear over the end of this menace ;(

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  35. From strength to strength by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't worry, this is the FBI which has made short shrift of Osama bin Laden, singlehandedly captured Saddam Hussein, cornered the Anthrax Mailer, cleverly foiled the 9/11 planebombings on advance intelligence, have kept Chinese industrial spies away from our tech secrets, has won the drug war, busted the thieves at Enron, WorldCom, Global Crossing, Arthur Anderson, and the rest. They found the malicious Bush leaker who blew CIA agent Plames cover in Niger, discredited the 16 State of the Union words about the imaginary African uranium bound for Iraq, preempted Iranian and North Korean nuclear bombs. They nabbed the 2000 election vote riggers, and are already jailing the criminals at the top of the 2004 eVote insecurity debacles. If they think something is scary, we should all bow our heads in fear, and double their budget again. If it were possible to promote the FBI chief, we would; instead, we'll just have to settle for the Patriot Act, which dissolves that archaic Bill of Rights which was just getting in the way.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:From strength to strength by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make it sound as though the FBI is completely auonomous and independent of the Government.

    2. Re:From strength to strength by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The FBI generally handles internal matters, so why are you complaining that they're not completing tasks they're not assigned? I think you should be look more at the CIA.

    3. Re:From strength to strength by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      What is it with the government ass-covering smokescreen responses on Slashdot? They're overwhelmingly from Anonymous Cowards. Every FBI failure I specified in the post is within the FBI's jurisdiction. Including the foreign components of investigations on which they're working, especially because so much of that jurisdiction is new, either Patriot Act or even extralegal. And they're bungling every one of them. As for the CIA, the FBI is supposed to investigate the CIA's screwups when they violate US law domestically. And we don't have to choose between these two devastatingly incompetent agencies for scrutiny. We have to fix each of them. When the topic is inane CIA amateurism, unlike the inane FBI amateurism of this topic, we can discuss those cases in more detail.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    4. Re:From strength to strength by fastidious+edward · · Score: 1

      And how do you propose reforming this amateurism of which you speak, or are you all complaint and no action?

      Perhaps this is the typical /. knee-jerk reaction?

      Perhaps you would now, in turn, like to blame India and China for stealing American jobs?

      Or complain about NASA, or the lack of funding of NASA, or the inefficiency of NASA despite its generous funding?

      Or is your real axe to grind about CEOs of tech companies, or Wall Street analysts not having a clue?

      Is there another pigeon hole in which to place you?

      --

      karma karma karma karma karma chameleon, you come and go, you come and go.
    5. Re:From strength to strength by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I expect to be among those voting in 2004 to fire the heads of government. Where I own shares, I will vote them to improve the governance of my property. Meanwhile, I will continue to engage public discussion of their incompetence (and worse). Drop the pigeonholes and say something constructive that helps us out of this mess.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    6. Re:From strength to strength by fastidious+edward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      In an election it is not possibly to vote against a candidate (simply for the opposition), so please tell tell for whom you will be voting, and why they are any different from others standing?

      In what way will they improve the state of governance?

      The majority of the voting population of the USA abstain from elections, are you engaging them in your described "discussin of incompetance", would you like to explain how and why the government are incompetant (personally I believe they are but see too many blaming others, e.g., steel imports, rather than justifying this position)?

      --

      karma karma karma karma karma chameleon, you come and go, you come and go.
    7. Re:From strength to strength by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

      With the Democratic primaries yet to get underway, there's no way to be sure which of the Democrat/Republican candidates will more likely "clean house". It's a pretty safe bet that it won't be Bush, who offers the worst governance here since George III (ironic). I already detailed some obvious, compelling government incompetence in my original post. I leave it to the candidates to pitch their vision of better governance, and the voters to decide which candidate to take up on their offer. As we write these words, you and I are engaging a fraction of the voters, however small. That kind of citizen activity is our privilege and duty. Shirking it is a luxury we cannot afford, exceeding it is not necessary when widely applied. This is the peer-to-peer model of unity that revolutionized government when installed in the late 1700s, and has kept us going for centuries since

      If we were to upgrade the US government, I'd keep the entire basic framework, of course. The problems we have now are mainly the result of the last few generations gaming the system, perverting small holes in the execution of the system into giant power abuses. If you're really listening, I'll hit a few highlights of my patches.

      Proportional voting. Or "instant runoffs" - instead of choosing only one candidate, and valuing the rest equally as "loser", we sort the candidates by preference. The one whose combined total is highest is the one best representing the voters. Lazy voters can just choose their top 2, 3 or 5. When proportional voting is underway, we can open the ballots to anyone meeting a minimum petition requirement for seriousness, like 5% of the registered voters in the voting district.

      Immediately drop the electoral college in favor of total popular vote percentage across the country, as it's an implementation artifact from centuries ago, when travel and communication was much cruder. Likewise the single Election Day, giving a floating day off work to anyone claiming it in an election November. Hell, if that isn't enough, let's study the cost/benefits of requiring best 2 out of 3 elections, across a month or two, with all results kept secret until the third was complete. Just to get a meaningful sample into the statistical model of "the will of the people", that we call an election.

      While we're at it, set the income of every elected official at the *median* (50/50% of population) salary in their constituency. With a pension at the upper 10% of that constituency. And no other income allowed, with annual audits. Encourage politicians to do it for more than the money, while guaranteeing them financial rewards, and an incentive to retire. With an additional incentive to long-range plan for the incomes of that constituency, to which their income will be directly tied.

      Still talking about auditing politicians, make the Office of Special Prosecutor *permanent*, hired/fired by the Supreme Court, with jurisdiction over the other two bodies. Let's give Congress a permanent Judicial Reform committee with Supreme Court oversight. Enough of this crap where President appoints whichever selfserving Attorney General he wants to run the Justice Department, usurping the Judicial Branch. That con should have died with Nixon's Saturday Night massacre, when a succession of AGs resigned rather than supress Watergate, until a compliant Robert Bork sucked up the sleaze (and was almost installed on the Supreme Court for life by Reagan 10 years later).

      Getting really "libertarian", let's require every candidate to submit their "promises" in writing, before the election. Every candidate seeking a possibly budget-proposing office would have to submit their budget *before* the election. Let's give Tax Day and Election Day (or Month) the same deadline. With tax forms & guides published in the same volumes as the candidates' proposals and sample ballots, submitted at the same time by citizens. Class action suits against lying politicians would be much easi

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    8. Re:From strength to strength by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Immediately drop the electoral college in favor of total popular vote percentage across the country, as it's an implementation artifact from centuries ago,

      Hell no it isn't, it's a design decision.

      Think "republic", not "democracy".

      Sure, the system could use some tweaking (or more likely, some undoing of previous tweaks), but don't even start until you grasp that fundamental.

      --
      -- Alastair
    9. Re:From strength to strength by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of all the changes I proposed, dropping the Electoral College is the most "radical", as in the dictionary definition "going to the root". The difference between a republic and a democracy, at least according to Plato, is the difference betwen the people setting the laws directly, and the people setting representatives who set the laws for them. Analogous to a value, and a pointer to a value. Or a libertarian society out of Heinlein's _The Moon is a Harsh Mistress_, with exclusively citizen's arrests, and immediate trials by a jury of witnesses and bystanders, versus selected representatives to do the work of government on behalf of the people, who periodically select those representatives.

      The Electoral College, though, is more like a "handle", a pointer to a pointer (to a value). The people elect Electors, who elect representatives, who elect laws. This design pattern is great for large populations of interchangeable sets of values, within which one repeatedly selects a specific value. Fast, repeated switching, along with clear semantics for the two layers of indirection are requirements for which handles are appropriate. They're also appropriate for very large populations of values, too large in number to address by the limited precision of a simple pointer. Memory spaces larger in magnitude than the bitwidth of the pointer are addressed this way, eg. >4GB RAM in a 32bit pointer to a character. Both of these applications of handles are workarounds for limitations of the addressing scheme. They work well, but when the limitations don't exist, they're unnecessary overkill, confusing, and prone to error, especially when writing new software that doesn't reflect the double-indirection of the handle.

      For the first hundred years or so of the American republic, a handle solved the problem of managing the communication of the large (1-10M+) population. Any timely consensus was "fast" in an age of horses and sail, across half a continent. And breaking the population into manageable tiers of components was absolutely necessary in managing reliable communication using newspapers among the largely illiterate, public speeches among the largely rural, and bean counting boxes among a largely post-feudal population. It was a design decision to overcome problems of implementing a republic on a scale orders of magnitude larger than any experienced by Plato, or anywhere else. It was wise to start the implementation with overkill and scale back, rather than fail early due to an unmanageable complexity. But now it just gets in the way.

      Who can defend any of the elections where the electoral vote misrepresented the popular vote, especially the gamed 2000 presidential election? The Electoral College was a flawed design from the beginning, vulnerable to system gaming. For example, a current book called _Negro President_ analyzes Jefferson's 1801 ascension to the the presidency owing to his electoral victories in the South. His electoral votes were swelled by the 3/5 elector per person value of slaves (who couldn't vote); if only voters were counted, Jefferson would have merely been a brilliant writer and revolutionary. Whether that would have been as good for the country, especially in light of the Louisiana Purchase, is another debate. But the will of the people was subverted by Electoral College manipulation, and continues to be. We don't need it, and its dead weight is helping drag down our country - drop it now.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    10. Re:From strength to strength by JK+Master-Slave · · Score: 1

      I can't believe you can blather on with soooo muuuuch text about the Electoral College without even apparently understanding that the 'historical artifact' that the Electoral College system is based around is the fact that we are a Union of States. Historically, each State had a Presidential election, and sends the delegates they elect to vote. The electors.

      It's a 'states right' issue left over from the days when the Federal Government answered to the State governments in some ways.

      I don't know what you mean by 'gamed' and I suspect it's a lot of armchair ranting. Keep politics as a hobby. You're definitely not ready to go pro.

    11. Re:From strength to strength by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Politics is for every citizen; "pros" are its main problem. We still have state-by-state Presidential elections, with the Secretary of State overseeing the assignment of Electoral ballots as per their state laws. This ancient workaround is getting in the way of the will of the people, as antidemocratic fixers rig elections by disproportionately working marginal rules.

      Your disingenous treatment of the gamed political system, dropping the "states rights" buzzword, your recent coining of a "Master-Slave" username all betray your cryptorightwing attitude. But the biggest giveaway is your fear of public speech you claim not to understand. But if you're going to be consistent, leave the Slashdot "armchair ranting" to professional hobbyists who understand the posts. Until you have something constructive to add to the discussion.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    12. Re:From strength to strength by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Pretty good ideas. However, you might want to do some searching on approval voting and Condorcet as they both address some major flaws with instant runoff voting.

      Instant runoffs sound good when you listen to them, but if you actually work out the numbers in a closely contested election involving more than two parties, you'll find that all kinds of strange situations can come up. It really only works when you have a de-facto two-party system and a minority of one party wants to vote for somebody else in protest.

      Election methods.org has a good writeup of some alternative vote-counting systems and their pros and cons. Approval voting is considered by some to be the method which best combines simplicity with workability in a multi-party environment. In theory Condorcet is probably the best, but to somebody who can't follow math it would seem like a black box that they would have no reason to trust.

      An interesting feature of democracy is that the system should exist to serve those who are in the minority. If congress votes 51-49% to pass a law which will benefit some while costing others, it is important for the 49% to feel that they really are sacrificing for the greater good and not just to benefit some official's campaign fund. Otherwise you end up with internal divisions. Most people are willing to not have their way as long as they understand why they have to do so, and have a feeling that the overall system is fair.

      Overall, though, I think you have a lot of good suggestions. And responding to another sub-thread here - politics is too important to trust it to just the politicians.

    13. Re:From strength to strength by drunkenbatman · · Score: 1

      Immediately drop the electoral college in favor of total popular vote percentage across the country, as it's an implementation artifact from centuries ago, when travel and communication was much cruder.

      You really need to do some more background research. The electoral college, and the fact that we're a republic instead of a straight democracy isn't completely due to a lack of instant mass communication at the time of the founding.

      Read Jefferson- they wanted to avoid a government "by the cities, of the cities and for the cities". In other words, you don't want your presidential candidate going to california and a few other highly populated states in the east coast and promising that you're going to ship all of their crap to the midwest.

    14. Re:From strength to strength by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting scenario. How does an electoral college fix that? Look at the Nevada nuclear dump. The Feds are forcing Nevada to accept the waste from around the US. The Nevada resistance, fairly successful so far, gets no help from the Electoral College. Nevada state laws prohibit the dumping, as determined by the locals. Nevada congressmembers work to negotiate federal laws and policies that would dump in their state.

      As I noted in another post, the US republic, as per the classical model, works with voters choosing representatives to choose laws. Inserting the Electoral College, chosen by voters, choosing representatives, doesn't make us more of a republic. Deleting it doesn't make us a pure (direct, Athenian) "democracy", with voters choosing laws. If anything, the Electoral College builds a pair of republics, where voters choose a republic of electors, and those electors choose a republic of representatives. That's unwieldy, desirable only in comparison to a more unwieldy voter -> representative election. But the direct election of representatives is no longer as unwieldy. Case in point, voters never realize they're voting for electors until something goes wrong, as it increasingly does (to disastrous effect in 2000). We think we're voting for representatives. The counting system should catch up with our consensus and our technology.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    15. Re:From strength to strength by drunkenbatman · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting scenario. How does an electoral college fix that? Look at the Nevada nuclear dump. The Feds are forcing Nevada to accept the waste from around the US. The Nevada resistance, fairly successful so far, gets no help from the Electoral College. Nevada state laws prohibit the dumping, as determined by the locals. Nevada congressmembers work to negotiate federal laws and policies that would dump in their state.

      Um, what about your point doesn't illustrate the dangers of what I was saying? That's sorta one of the areas republicans/libertarians would point to as the federal government overstepping its bounds and imposing its will upon the states... overstepping its mandate, or simply saying that the federal government tries to exhibit too much influence over the states, to the point where there'll be few reasons to have state governments at all and they'll simply be an extension of the federal governments will (some would argue that this has already occurred in de facto due to states being tied to federal funding).

      With a direct vote on all the issues, it'd simply be more acute. Your specific example is like saying "Look at what happened to this man by the police! It doesn't look like civil rights are protecting us at all, so why have them!"

      As I noted in another post, the US republic, as per the classical model, works with voters choosing representatives to choose laws. Inserting the Electoral College, chosen by voters, choosing representatives, doesn't make us more of a republic. Deleting it doesn't make us a pure (direct, Athenian) "democracy", with voters choosing laws. If anything, the Electoral College builds a pair of republics, where voters choose a republic of electors, and those electors choose a republic of representatives. That's unwieldy, desirable only in comparison to a more unwieldy voter -> representative election. But the direct election of representatives is no longer as unwieldy

      I'm not saying the electoral college is the perfect system- but was trying to illustrate the dangers of a pure democracy (popular vote!) as well, the democratics are really fond of bringing up in light of the Bush/Gore thing. The electoral college does protect against that in a way that a pure popular vote doesn't, even if it seems "less pure".

      You do away with it- and that's whats going to happen, it's only natural. IE, if IL all worked via popular vote, it would be technically possible, and probably not "ungainly", but I can guarantee you that every single resource would automatically start going to Chicago, as that's where the majority of the voters are. Funding. Schooling. Trash/waste. You already see this sort of thing to a degree, as again, its only natural.

      That's what having a republic is designed to protect against.

    16. Re:From strength to strength by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I've repeated this several times in the current thread, but it doesn't seem to be clearly received: the Electoral College does not create our republic; our election of representatives creates our republic. The middle level of electing electors merely made it more convenient to count a widely dispersed, large population. That convenience is now superfluous, and its overhead is getting in the way. The redundancy of the Electoral College is even more obvious when we consider that the electors, once chosen, are rarely free to vote for any candidate, but rather represent a formula specified by their state's laws, like all for the winningest candidate, or proportional to the candidates' respective fractions of the votes. It is those variances, and their susceptibility to situational rigging, like in Florida 2000, that makes the Electoral College a dangerous loose cannon.

      Where is the role of the Electoral College in protecting a state from Nevada's situation, a real example of your suggested scenario? No role. But the actual republic is functioning to allow Nevada to protect itself. This scenario has been repeated across the country in just nuclear policy, as local governments deny permits to nuclear plants, labs and "disposal" facilities which would be environmentally subsidizing the beneficiaries of the nuclear industry elsewhere. There are many other kinds of examples that show how your kind of nightmare scenario is unrelated to the existing Electoral College, but protected by the actual republic structure we need to keep. No one is talking about a "direct" (Athenian) democracy, except the occasional champions of the Electoral College in this thread, who insist that the EC == republic, and no EC == direct democracy. We will be only the better for a true, uncluttered republic.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    17. Re:From strength to strength by Arthur+Dent · · Score: 1
      Good points. But they will freak out a lot of folks. My proposal is to start simple with just two modifications :

      1. No voice/consensus votes in the house/senate. Let us know exactly how each congressperson/senator voted.
      2. No amendments to bills that have nothing to do with the bills primary purpose. Example: The PATRIOT act should not have a rider changing the definition of overtime.

    18. Re:From strength to strength by Arthur+Dent · · Score: 1

      I think that the Nevada nuclear dump can be traced to a failure of the senators. The 'elected' senators from Nevada are not doing their Job in the senate of looking out for the best interests of Nevada.

    19. Re:From strength to strength by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Hear here. The strategy for getting my "platform" ;) implemented is an open question, and your proposal is a very good way to start. How about every vote requires a recorded ballot, but that ballot can be sent using a secure line, like an encrypted phone followed by certified letter - no more copping out on committee hearings "because I have to go vote". And every "abstain" vote requires a written explanation of the rep's "none of the above" position. How about a maximum number of abstentions per session, and much smaller number of skipped votes?

      As for amendments, we need a scoping rule. How about saying a law can only scope to a single agency, unless creating an agency with oversight of multiple agencies? Requiring higher thresholds for passing a law that covers more than one of the three branches of government? Requiring every law to include an expiration date, or at least a date for a review vote, where a larger margin is required for recinding than its original margin of passage?

      BTW, Zaphod called, and wants his towel back, washed, in time for the premiere :).

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  36. Aussies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Damn those Aussies!

    They've got everything sorted out. They've got sunny beaches, cold beer and hot babes and now you're telling me that they don't have to go and fight in the third world war either!?

    It's just not fair!

  37. So? I'm too lazy to change my prefs every 2 weeks by caveat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I don't know how frequently it happens to the rest of you, but I score mod points every couple of weeks - I hate having to change from threaded to nested, Not to mention that I dont really have the time to process 2-500 comments per story. I look at high-modded comments that appeal to me and have spawned threads, and then just read and mod the thread. Maybe /. should be more selective with moderators, and offer to pay them say $100 for 24 hours with 5 points, so they can have the time to peruse every comment.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  38. Re:News just in: 25,000 niggers die in Iran! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what do you prefer that term for... to describe your momma?

  39. Re:Virus are on Border of living and Dead Matter . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And some idiots still insist on using the wrong plural of virus.

    You can't even use the lame ass excuse that 'virii' is the accepted plural for computer viruses, because you are talking about actual viruses here.

    Rot in hell, moron.

  40. I, For one by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    welcome are new FBI overlords.

    Seriously, this was probably a routine chit chat thay have when enybody discovers something like this.

    I'm sure they new full well it wasn't a real issue. otherwise it would have been VANS of FBI agents.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:I, For one by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      welcome are new FBI overlords.

      New?

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    2. Re:I, For one by JK+Master-Slave · · Score: 1

      'New' as in: most people go about their business and are essentially free in the U.S.

      All fantasies inspired by watching too much X-Files cast aside, of course.

  41. What a coincidence! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like scabs too! And now the Centers for Disease Control has essentially said that that's not abnormal!

    Yay!

    1. Re:What a coincidence! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're Awful

  42. Captain Obvious strikes again! by mabu · · Score: 4, Funny

    the FBI had concerns that the smallpox may have been planted in the book

    In a related story, the authorities are now scouring libraries coast to coast to find the book entitled, "Where I Am Hiding" by Osama Bin Laden.

    1. Re: Captain Obvious strikes again! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny


      > In a related story, the authorities are now scouring libraries coast to coast to find the book entitled, "Where I Am Hiding" by Osama Bin Laden.

      Easy; he's hiding in Iraq's WMD storage facility.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Captain Obvious strikes again! by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny
      In a related story, the authorities are now scouring libraries coast to coast to find the book entitled, "Where I Am Hiding" by Osama Bin Laden.

      A source close to the FBI stated that they would be questioning Waldo, as "soon as we've found him. He's a slippery sucker, tho, so it may take some time."

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  43. Maybe we should... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe we should start training ourselves in case medical help is too far away or otherwise unavailable. You never know...

    More info.

  44. Re:So? I'm too lazy to change my prefs every 2 wee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this just demonstrates that you just mod those that have been modded up.

    Don't you feel that makes your moderation worthless?

    Why not browse those recent couple of stories (no one asks you to rehash the last two weeks) nested at threshold 0 (the editors take most of the obvious trolls out to -1 almost instantly).

    Personally, I browse at 0, nested becasue mods often fail to highlight meaningful posts posted at +0 or +1 only, and the browsing system doesn't allow recursion through threads in any nice way otherwise.

  45. Is a virus an independent living organism? by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1
    OK, a virus is subcellular so it is biological but not really life, or perhaps it is a peculiar kind of parasite of symbiont.

    I am wondering if a virus is really a separate entity or is really intrinsically a property of the host. Is a cold virus really just that, or is it a piece of human genetic machinery that has the capability of being shared between humans when one human picks their nose?

    The reason I got to wondering is that it seems diseases that stick around have some kind of evolutionary purpose. Sickle cell anemia gene confers resistance to malignant malaria, cystic fibrosis gene confers resistance to cholera, and so on. Sexual reproduction was a big evolutionary breakthrough in allowing diversity in the offspring to adapt to environmental pressure.

    Do you suppose a virus is a remnant of some other mechanism, such as conjugation where bacteria can swap genetic material? If a virus served no evolutionary purpose, it seems that individuals who were virus resistant would have a slight edge and over many generations viruses would die out. The fact that they are still here suggests that the cell mechanisms that support virus reproduction serve some other purpose than making a person sick.

    1. Re:Is a virus an independent living organism? by exhilaration · · Score: 1

      This is what I was taught: The definition of life is anything that has a metabolic system. In other words, to be called alive, it must convert food to energy or energy to food (photosynthesis).

  46. Re:On one hand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong thread buddy

  47. Kubrick's Doomsday Device by Latent+Heat · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Why is the heck would the Russians want smallpox or any other bioweapon on an ICBM (I heard Ken Alibek on TV suggesting that it was for ICBM's)? I can understand a nuke because besides killing people, a nuke can take out fortified sites and infrastructure and impair the ability to fight back. Also, a modern ICBM has a high speed pointy-end forward reentry vehicle, unlike the blunt RV's of early RV's. The blunt body RV has less of a heat shield requirement, but its rapid deceleration and slow entry hurts accuracy and makes it vulnerable to anti-missile defense. So if you have a high speed RV, how the heck do you even dispense a biologic agent that it does much harm?

    Also, a biologic agent takes hours if not days to act, allowing for retaliatory strikes, so a biologic ICBM is clearly a kind of Doomsday Machine -- what is to say that the smallbox doesn't spread back to Russia. And you have such a Doomsday Machines, in the words of Peter Sellers, why don't you advertise it to the whole world? What good is a Doomsday Machine that you keep secret?

    1. Re:Kubrick's Doomsday Device by mesocyclone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At many times, the Russians have felt that they could win a nuclear war against the US.

      And as far as what good is it? The population after a nuclear attack is especially vulnerable (reduced resistance due to stress or radiation sickness, medical facilities overflowed, lots of movement to spread the disease).

      The Russians could simply have a vast supply of vaccine ready to distribute.

      As far as how you dispense the agent, you use a different RV.

      There is no doubt that the USSR had a vast bioweapons program. Many outsiders have now seen the remnants of it, so we are not just relying on Alibek's views. The British had a defector who kept quiet for years about it who had the same story.

      And remember, the USSR was not the most rational or efficient organization. The fact that it *could* make these warheads may have been enough to cause them to do it.

      --

      The only good weather is bad weather.

    2. Re:Kubrick's Doomsday Device by vmxeo · · Score: 1

      Check out the book Demon In the Freezer by Richard Preston. He chronicles the smallpox eradication effort along with Soviet efforts to turn it into a weapon of mass destruction.

      In theory, a bioweapon of this sort would be more of a deterent than a pratical weapon, much like nuclear weapons. The disease itself is horrible, and spreads very easily. This is one of the scarier book I've read in a while. I'd do up a review for slashdot, but I'm too lazy.

      The Hot Zone is also a good book by the same author about Ebola. I'd recommended going down to your local library and checking them out. Just don't open small envelopes you might find tucked inside...

    3. Re:Kubrick's Doomsday Device by danielobvt · · Score: 1

      The stated reasons that I have seen for mounting it on warheads was not for immediate effect. They were looking for it to inhibit the rebuilding of the country afterwards. The russians believed that we are really good at rebuilding things after disasters/war (Japan, Western Europe, etc).

    4. Re:Kubrick's Doomsday Device by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Considering the delivered virus particles would likely get fried to oblivion along with whatever else the ICBM hits, this sounds to me more like Rube Goldberg's Doomsday Device!!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  48. Re:Virus are on Border of living and Dead Matter . by Yunalesca · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First, I think if they can get any DNA out of it, that would be nice. If they mostly (at least supposedly) want to study the evolution of the virus, I'm sure they can garner some information just by comparing the DNA sequence of whatever they pull out, vs. the "current" stock. Of course it's always best to get the whole genome, but there will almost always be highly conserved (having a very low mutation rate) DNA regions. In organisms with large genomes, you can often compare those against each other to study the amount of divergence.

    Second ...

    "This could lead to a greater evolutionary understanding of the smallpox vaccine we're using in the U.S.,"

    Hm ... I'm slightly confused. If the latest vaccine used was cowpox-based, are they trying to study the similarities between now-cowpox and then-smallpox? I can see them wanting to understand how a virus has evolved, but I don't see what exactly comparing it to cowpox would do. Perhaps they want to study how the two have diverged. Any thoughts?

    --
    The floggings will stop when morale improves.
  49. Ken Alibek is not 100% reliable by Slashamatic · · Score: 1

    There is no doubt that Kanatjan Alibekov knows a lkt about bio weapons. It is also clear that the island of Vozrozhdeniye is contaminated to hell and that Biopreperat was involved with the nasties. I think that he is exaggerating though because of his involvement with the bioweapons detection and defense industry.

  50. Re:Virus are on Border of living and Dead Matter . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you implying you didn't know what he meant? Or that there was a recent emergency international broadcast of the appropriate plural usage of 'virus'?

    Or are you just an ass?

  51. Re:Virus are on Border of living and Dead Matter . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you making excuses for ignorance?
    Do you promote ignorance as a virtue?

  52. The Following Items Will Be Found In Iraq SOON: by crazyhorse44 · · Score: 1

    Jimmy Hoffa's Corpse
    Amelia Airheart's Plane
    WMD's
    OP's Smallpox Strain
    Ozzy Osbourne's Balls
    The Holy Grail
    Nichole Brown Simpson's TRUE Killer

    They're all just sitting there waiting to be picked up.... REALLY!

    --
    . SLASHDOT: Home of the vicious nerd.
    1. Re:The Following Items Will Be Found In Iraq SOON: by sanity_slipping · · Score: 1

      ... but no Osama bin Laden.

      --
      I can feel my sanity, beyond my reach and slipping...
  53. Why this may not be for real (sheesh!) by rubmytummy · · Score: 1

    I believe I remember from high school biology that scabs from a vaccination would yield cowpox virus, not smallpox. If that's so, then surely this has to be some combination of hoax, urban myth, and/or publicity grab.

    1. Re:Why this may not be for real (sheesh!) by blockhouse · · Score: 1

      I believe I remember from high school biology that scabs from a vaccination would yield cowpox virus

      Thats true, if you were vaccinated with cowpox virus, which is the method Edward Jenner introduced in the 18th Century. That's probably what you read about in your high school biology book. However, assuming you're not 200+ years old, you were probably vaccinated with killed (i.e. chemically inactivated) smallpox virions, which is what they used to make smallpox vaccine for the past several decades.

      This is why it's critical, IMO, that the last legal stores of live smallpox not be destroyed. If a heretofore undiscovered store of smallpox (say, in a library book) is discovered and starts killing people, we would have no source material from which to develop a vaccine. That, and I've never been comfortable with the ethics of intentionally causing the extinction of any organism (assuming virii qualify as organisms), regardless of the harm they've historically caused.

    2. Re:Why this may not be for real (sheesh!) by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 1
      If a heretofore undiscovered store of smallpox (say, in a library book) is discovered and starts killing people, we would have no source material from which to develop a vaccine.

      Except of course the source material that happens to be out in the wild killing people.

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
  54. Call Fear Factor! -nt- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  55. Business Plan by -kertrats- · · Score: 1

    1. Check out century old book 2. Plant smallpox scabs 3. Have scabs found by innocent bystander 4. ??? 5. PROFIT!!

    --
    The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
    1. Re:Business Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3.5
      Discover carridge returns

    2. Re:Business Plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4 == Report on Fox News

  56. Useful discovery for future prevention reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is probably the first time it's been possible to test the long-term lifespan of the virus. If the scabs are, as hoped, totally dead and consequently pose no danger, that means future generations may be able to sleep a little easier. If it's dead.. then so are a lot of other virii stored likewise.

    However

    In the 19th century railways tunnels were built to connect Kings Cross in London with the main railways to the North-East. The tunnels were bored through an undocumented plague grave. Several workers were infected with the Bubonic plague as a result

    And that is a real nightmare virus.

    1. Re:Useful discovery for future prevention reasons by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Several workers were infected with the Bubonic plague as a result

      And that is a real nightmare virus.


      Sorry to ruin your fun, but...

      First. Black Death is a bacteria.

      Second. Bubonic form of it is nothing exceptially nightmarish in the civilized countries today, since it can easily be treated with antibiotics.
      Pneumonic plague is worse, though it can be treated as well. Uber-resistant strain of either would obviously be bad news.

      Third. Y. Pestis bacteria doesn't survive outside of a host more than few hours, so if someone indeed got a plague while boring a tunnel, they got it from the same source original victims did. Rats (their fleas, actually)

      Yup, that's right. Plague is still in the wild, there are about 1000-3000 cases of plague in humans each year.

  57. Sad that I agree with you. :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can almost remember when I used to be asleep.
    Tough being alone surrounded by sleepers.

  58. Probably not smallpox virus anyway by KFW · · Score: 5, Interesting

    AIAAD (Actually, I am a doctor). In fact, my specialty is Infectious Diseases.

    By 1888 vaccination against smallpox using cowpox or vaccinia virus was a common practice, as opposed to "variolization" (inoculation with actual smallpox virus, aka variola virus), since the former was so much safer. This is touched on only briefly in the Washington Post article. So even if there is viable virus in the scab, it may not be smallpox. For reference see the first part of this chapter.

    >K

  59. Re:News just in: 25,000 niggers die in Iran! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As you forfeited your's to the mods who sided on the side of the trolls ad modded you down in support ofthe trollish predicessors, sir.

  60. Christmas present by 3Suns · · Score: 1

    CDC: Ohh! An envelope full of infectious scabs... This is the best Christmas ever!

    --

    -3Suns

    ~~~~
    The Revolution will be Slashdotted
  61. "Doc, what should i do with these scabs?" by iamhassi · · Score: 1
    Nurse: Dr, what should I do with these smallpox scabs?
    Dr: Oh, just put it in a book so 100 years from now someone can find it and get all excited.

    Anyone else find this just a tiny bit sick? Saving scabs for later use?

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    1. Re:"Doc, what should i do with these scabs?" by tgd · · Score: 1

      Smallpox scabs were used widely to provide immunity for hundreds of years outside of Europe before there was the concept of vaccination.

  62. Re:Virus are on Border of living and Dead Matter . by canajin56 · · Score: 1

    Yes, they explained that. His point, however, was viruses are not living things, so it wouldn't be possible to find a living sample. It's pedantics, mostly. It's generally understood that a "dead" virus is one that is damaged to the point that it can no longer infect a cell.

    --
    ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
  63. MOD PARENT UP, GRANDPARENT DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    really.

  64. Forgotten envelopes ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny. Every time I go past some 1-n x 100 year old construction being torn down, I think of the scores of undernourished and sickly slave / immigrants / miserably-poor-in-general - workers that built them, coughing, retching, bleeding,sneezing or spitting as they piled brick, adobe, wattle or stone upon moist mortar. And then more brick, wattle, adobe or stone.

    And try not to breathe as I pass the clouds of fine dry dust that waft up from the new demolitions done for progress' and economy's sake.

    I do definitively feel an urge to invest in exotic pharmaceuticals.

    But, if the wars in Europe didn't bring back The Plague, then, well, we can all rest easy. Right ?

  65. Re:Virus are on Border of living and Dead Matter . by Tim+C · · Score: 1

    I think that you want to be thinking "live" as in ammunition, rather than "live" as in animal.

  66. WMD gift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What sort of idiot would give a potentially deadly Weapon of Mass Destruction to the government that is the greatest propagator of such items? How many kilotons of smallpox, anthrax and other goodies already exist in US stockpiles (and shared responsibly only with our trusted allies of the moment). And now some generous soul gives them another variety with which to hold the world hostage? God save us from such generosity.

  67. Re:Virus are on Border of living and Dead Matter . by exhilaration · · Score: 1

    Thank you. That's exactly what they mean.

  68. Risk Analysis and a question by randall_burns · · Score: 1
    Current odds of smallpox remerging by 2010 is currently a bit less than 30 percent according to Ideosphere's risk analysis.


    My question on this issue: why wouldn't PCR allow the DNA for a smallpox virus to be recreated from such a sample(or for that matter from samples dug up from some graveyard someplace)? I'm not that familiar with virology-pointers to the literature would be welcome.

  69. Thanks by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    Hi Doc -

    I just want to say Thanks for the intelligent, articulate, and persevering posts. You rock.

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:Thanks by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the positive feedback. It's fun thinking through my ideas in writing, validating against an imagined geek audience. Grinding deniers who can't put their minds where their mouths are is another reward. But the occasional fellow reader who chimes gives the best feeling of all. We are not alone ;).

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  70. That's Faux News by sideshow · · Score: 0, Troll

    get it right or pay the price.

    --

    Hollow words will burn and hollow men will burn.

  71. and 28 Days Later ... by donbrock · · Score: 0

    The entire world's population will be reduced to deranged psychos looking for fresh blood.

  72. Re:Virus are on Border of living and Dead Matter . by Slowping · · Score: 1


    Hm ... I'm slightly confused. If the latest vaccine used was cowpox-based, are they trying to study the similarities between now-cowpox and then-smallpox? I can see them wanting to understand how a virus has evolved, but I don't see what exactly comparing it to cowpox would do. Perhaps they want to study how the two have diverged. Any thoughts?


    Well, I think that most likely they'd compare these smallpox samples with the frozen ones. You know, the "last" of the smallpox virus, controlled by the government, in some highly guarded freezer somewhere. Identifying how those samples differ could lead to insights into current cowpox-based vaccines.

    --
    (\(\
    (^.^)
    (")")
    *beware the cute-bunny virus
  73. Not for First Strike by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 1

    More than likely these would have been used after the inital nuclear strike. It's probably more cost-effective to have a disease spread over the mid-west US, western Canada, Mexico, and other places any remaining Americans would have fled to.

    --
    I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
  74. One more reason to close all the libraries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That will teach those uppity librarians for refusing to follow Ridge's orders to track everything everyone read...damn terrorists. Libraries are dangerous places, I tell you. Full of ideas, evil ideas even. And disease. Probably drugs, too. And sex.

    1. Re:One more reason to close all the libraries by batlike · · Score: 1

      Don't forget hookers and beer...

    2. Re:One more reason to close all the libraries by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Dangit! I must be going to the wrong libraries.

  75. Re:Virus are on Border of living and Dead Matter . by a-aiyar · · Score: 2, Informative

    If the virus is nothing but the DNA and a protein coating around it, why are the people wanting it to be live?

    Am I missing something? What am I missing?

    As a card-carrying virologist let me give you a run down on the information you're missing. If you don't consider the type of nucleic acid (RNA or DNA), there are two types of viruses that infect mammalian cells - enveloped and non-enveloped. Enveloped viruses (such as smallpox) have an outer lipid bilayer (the envelope) that is studded with glycoproteins that need to bind specific molecules on the surface of mammalian cells to permit fusion between the viral envelope and the cell membrane. Fusion allows the virus' nucleic acid to enter the cell. The viral envelope is very fragile, and breaks down rapidly when dried. When the envelope breaks down, it spills the contents of the virus out -- i.e. the nucleic acid, which in the absence of the envelope doesn't have a means to specifically enter a cell. This is one reason why wiping surfaces with 100% ethanol (a dehydrating agent) is quite effective against enveloped viruses like HIV.

    Even viruses that are not enveloped have protein coats that directly interact with cell surface molecules that act as receptors to mediate the entry of these viruses into cells. The proteins that make up these coats also denature (lose their proper shape) with time, although this is typically a slower process.

    Finally, how stable is the viral nucleic acid? Viral nucleic acids are typically not present as naked RNA or DNA, but in a complex of DNA or RNA with proteins that coat them. These coated nucleic acids are quite stable. Nucleic acid from DNA viruses (like smallpox) is likely to be more stable than nucleic acid from RNA viruses, and I'm guessing that they should be able to do phylogenetic studies on the strain of smallpox present in those scabs after amplifying recovered DNA by PCR.

    BTW, after many years of Slashdot lurking, a wee bit of horn tooting. My lab works on how the genome of EBV latches on to human chromosomes. Here's a pretty picture from our work that was on the cover of the Journal of Virology last month.

  76. Re:I'm glad... by nitrocloud · · Score: 1

    Mmm... figs... .... ..... Meet you after I delve into this jar of fig preserves...

    --
    Karma: Good, or bust!
  77. Weapon of mass distructions by iandb · · Score: 1

    Maybe this is the same virus strain that was used by Colonel Bouquet when he responded to Lord Amherst's request when he wrote: "Could it not be contrived to send the Small Pox among those disaffected tribes of Indians? We must on this occassion use every stratagem in our power to reduce them".

    1. Re:Weapon of mass distructions by batlike · · Score: 1

      If this is the case there must be a ready supply if the said indians were burried above ground (as well documented in westerns) and wraped in their blankets...

  78. Perfect English @ Slashdot by svanstrom · · Score: 1
    First, "themself" is not even close to a real word. If you're trying to do a cockney accent, don't.


    I forgot that only those that speak/write perfect english are allowed to post to slashdot; poor you having to read what an imperfect human wrote, I understand that it must have been a very painful experience for you.

    Do you prefer am. or br. spelling? I just want to know what I should spend the next 2-3 years studying before posting again, so that you don't have to be insulted by my bad english ever again.
    --
    perl -e'print$_{$_} for sort%_=`lynx -dump svanstrom.com/t`'
  79. Fair and Balanced : oxymoron by batlike · · Score: 1

    It is either fair or balanced.

  80. Re:Virus are on Border of living and Dead Matter . by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 1

    One scab - scab
    More than one scab - scabii

    --
    This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
  81. Memory of smallpox by dad2viii · · Score: 1

    In about 1914, my grandmother's family was hit by smallpox in the farming community of Tallapoosa County, Alabama. It prostrated both parents (in their early 30's) and the eldest daughter, leaving only the five-year-old daughter (later my grandmother) to prepare food for the family and care for her baby sister. All lived, which probably means the virus was variola minor, a new, weaker version of smallpox, which had a 1% mortality rate (in place of the horrible 20% rate for variola major). Variola minor was the most common smallpox by the twentieth century. Yet look at how strongly this weaker form disabled a whole family of healthy people. We must not lose the horror of this disease, especially variola major. It must be kept down. Fortunately, it has no animal hosts holding it in mutating reserve, like influenza or SARS. Stopping it in people stops it. Even a large emergency would be stoppable, eventually.

    1. Re:Memory of smallpox by chiph · · Score: 1

      It prostrated both parents (in their early 30's) and the eldest daughter, leaving only the five-year-old daughter (later my grandmother) to prepare food for the family and care for her baby sister.

      The quaratine period for smallpox is 17 days, so I assume the relatives or local health officials would leave food on the doorstep for them (brave people!)

      Given today that most people in the US don't have relatives living nearby to perform such a service, how many /. readers have 17 day's worth of food in their houses?

      Chip H.

    2. Re:Memory of smallpox by dad2viii · · Score: 1
      Given today that most people in the US don't have relatives living nearby to perform such a service, how many /. readers have 17 day's worth of food in their houses?

      You make a good point about the problems of preparedness and distance from family. Not all our best solutions are technological, even for /. readers. But what is different in our problem today and how does it change the solution?

      One major change between 1914 and 2003 is logistical. Then the limits were based on travel time between people. Now they are based more on sparse relationships across concentrated populations. The lessons for preparation and responsiveness are interesting.

      At that time and place, there was about a mile between homes (I know, because I helped fence the land when I was a boy and saw the houses and ruins of houses). Cars and trucks were still rare. The rate of travel was between 5 and 10 miles per hour if the dirt roads were dry. Assuming 10 hours of useful daylight for travel and delivery, one full-time person could cover about 75 miles in a day. Assuming some out-and-back routes, that is fewer than 40 homes per day.

      Travel time made both communication and most deliveries local. It made the spread of disease slow and kept the ratio of victims to helpers low. People tended to work, study, worship, and socialize with neighbors. Families were even linked by multiple marriages. So when sickness came, the helper knew the victim well and lived nearby. News of trouble would reach a helper pretty soon. Help was likely to come.

      Today (or anytime in cities), most people live close to more people than they have time to know, let alone monitor. Many have moved away from their birthplaces. Beyond the density itself, people today choose to spend little time with neighbors. Travel time is virtually no issue at all, but isolation is.

      One risk today is a communication limit: that someone will be overlooked in a crowd of strangers because human networking breaks down through relational isolation. The internet and phone networks do not perfectly complement physical neighborhoods. Trouble goes undetected. Some people suffer or die in isolation.

      Yet a public health emergency is likely, because high population density leads to high physical exposure to infected people. When there is such an emergency, another risk is density of victims: delivering physical support can overwhelm those who are routinely trained and supplied to help. Physical help is always local. The earlier the care or supply is required, the closer the helper must be to the victim before the trouble begins.

      The point is that preparedness and relationship in the local community still make sense in 2003, but for different reasons than in 1914. Local help is still the best way to make sure people have food, water, energy, medical supplies, and trained medical helpers when they need them in emergencies. We have to do a lot of it, though, as a society, much more than paid EMS and government agencies can handle. It has to be nearly universal and very local, if disaster is to be averted in a bioattack. Maybe this is the /. layer of the solution: peer-to-peer organization.

      The best people to make this work well are probably the old. They are at home a lot and can take time to organize the energies of us busy younger people. They are getting to be more technosavvy, too. We can help them set up their communications and record-keeping. Whether epidemic, fire or earthquake is the cause of need, storing a few weeks' supplies for yourself and a few other families makes a lot of sense, too.

      Thanks for the reminder, chiph. New Year's Day is coming, so here is my first resolution. It's time for me to replace the four-year-old earthquake supplies and invite those new neighbors over for hog jowls and black-eyed peas (got that from the same grandmother, /.ers)!

  82. Re:Sad that I agree with you. :( by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    If you are alone, whose voice is coming from this post? :)

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  83. missing category by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    What is really needed now is a moderation option called "Eeewwwww!"