Discontinued, but still available for $110. http://www.frys.com/product/6708525 Also, hello again Brien King. But you knew me under a different username.
I am very pleased to see some good case design. I really like having a case that is fun to look at. (The odd thing with non-computer types is if they see a really snazzy case, they assume you've got some sort of super computer under the hood!) This one is a little interesting, but I don't think it is $400 worth. Myself, I recently got a lot of bang for the buck modding some NZXT Phantom cases. They've already got a very nice sci-fi design and look like props from Mass Effect. They are $90 shipped at TigerDirect right now, which is tough to beat. Large as hell, too. I think the only thing I really didn't like about it is that some of the older NZXT Phantom cases have USB 2.0 built in. The newer one I picked up had 2.0 and 3.0 built into the case. But back on topic, PLEASE, encourage cool case makers. I just don't think this one is $400 cool.
I would probably only know that the second core had finally been enabled for non-UI tasks if I had read an unofficial changelog (because TiVo does not produce one) in an unofficial TiVo forum. I believe you mean here:
I will disregard your underlying message that missing an announcement that never came from TiVo nor actively pursuing an unofficial TiVo forum signifies that one does not actually own a TiVo. That's fanboy behavior. I do, however, congratulate you on your problem-free experience. I don't know how you small minority of users manage it.
My latest... no, my last purchase of a TiVo was the Premier with lifetime service. The unit is riddled with bugs.
I never expect them to get the second CPU core enabled. It is short of RAM. It bogs down. It ignores the remote for a while when you sit back down in front of the couch (which I suspect is because the OS swap out the remote control's handler process during a memory shortage). It crashes. It has a bare-bones Netflix interface that likes to crash. The high definition user interface is STILL incomplete, with many screens dropping back down to standard definition. The Amazon Video interface can't do free Prime movies. Only purchases. The non-discrete directional buttons on the remote makes for regular menu selection mistakes. If your Internet connection goes down, your locked out of much of the unit's functionality until you return.
I could go on and on about all the problems with their product. And I see that other people have their own observations. TiVo isn't in the game of producing a product/service that consumers want. We are actually just what they're selling. Collecting eyeballs for add space. And then adding bullet points for new features with minimal functionality and playing the patent race game.
Admittedly, the only good thing to come out of them recently was the iPad TiVo remote control. Nicely done. But then, they weren't doing it for their customers, I'm sure, as much as they were trying to beef up their patent portfolio, probably vs Apple.
If TiVo dies tomorrow, I won't be sad. I'll go back to the cable company's DVR and I'd enjoy it. Having all the pre-paid hardware and service is the only thing keeping me holding on. TiVo once put the customer first, but they lost sight of us. Too bad. These days, TiVo owners don't make great evangelists for their product.
The instructions were brand new and horribly incomplete at the time, but it was fun to hunt down all of the pieces to the puzzle on an environment I was completely unfamilar with. I was mostly interested in learning more about the Android platform, and also to enable Google's Android Marketplace and other Google apps.
I unrooted the Fire (so that Amazon Video on Demand would continue to work), and used the Marketplace to download a better video player app (MX Video Player) and a number of decent games. I didn't go with the Dolphin browser or the GO Launcher for my defaults. (Not that I'm excited about Amazon's launcher.) So basically, I have what acts like a stock Kindle Fire, except I've got Android Marketplace access. I think that combination makes this a winning device. I'll still purchase from Amazon when it makes sense, but I'll go to Google for selection.
The only significant snag I've seen so far is that the pop-up menu bar onto the Kindle Fire slightly confuses apps by a number of pixels about screen size or placement. Some apps will chop off the top of their app's display. Of course, others will use the bottom of the screen for their own menu bar, leaving you with scant pixels (in landscape mode) to hit their buttons. That, and a few apps like the VLC Direct player seems to get me into situations which lock my Kindle from time to time, so I mostly don't use it.
At least when I download Marketplace apps, I can delete applications now and now worry about them haunting my 'cloud applications' screen forever. If I download Angry Birds Free, and then pay for Angry Birds (and remove the free version), do I really need to see two different Angry Birds icons on my device forever, Amazon? Well, I asked, and you apologized that I couldn't delete it. You hinted that you may allow this in the future, and you gave me a $5 credit for my inconvenience. You're not so bad.
Anyhow, rooting and installing the Amazon Marketplace is a little bit of a bumpy road, but it seems to be totally worth it.
SCADA? I don't care about. Not directly. But the problem is that once the government says, "These aren't vulnerabilities or security holes. These are design issues." The problem is that you've set the example, and other software vendors are going to follow.
Example: "The denial of service attack against your application is not a security vulnerability, it is just a design issue that everything locks up for a while if it gets an incoming packet, and tries to resolve the IP address against its authoritative DNS server while that is DNS server is offline. We only do security fixes on old products / old releases. Sorry."
"Design issue, not a security vulnerability" is not a distinction you want easily drawn. Others will follow a government example if it is an easy out.
Please see their original report and press release. Here are some quotes from the August 5th press release:
"The political brinksmanship of recent months highlights what we see as America’s governance and policymaking becoming less stable, less effective, and less predictable than what we previously believed. The statutory debt ceiling and the threat of default have become political bargaining chips in the debate over fiscal policy."
"Compared with previous projections, our revised base case scenario now assumes that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, due to expire by the end of 2012, remain in place. We have changed our assumption on this because the majority of Republicans in Congress continue to resist any measure that would raise revenues, a position we believe Congress reinforced by passing the act. "
Their explanation didn't suddenly switch to political. It was there all along, yet so few pundits chose to focus on it.
I still remember the day the HP sales/technical team came on-site to give us a presentation. Flashy videos with Carly Fiorina's new vision of the future. And a bright tomorrow with a new CPU line... out with PA-RISC and in with Itanic. Their sales team looked at each other nervously as we expressed our evaluation of the arrangement as a failed vision. It didn't take them long to figure out that dumping their in-house CPU to go with the Itanic would doom them to irrelevancy. And it did.
Now the Itanium itself is sinking from irrelevancy. It took too long. This chip was a disaster. Glad to see it go.
I blame (the lack of) security options
on
Why Wave Failed
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
Google Wave was only useful to me if I could trust 100% of the participants in the Wave. Yes, yes, there is a roll-back to undo damage. Not good enough.
If I had a group of Internet participants, that absolutely wasn't the case. There was no in-between. Either you trusted someone and they could do almost anything, or you didn't. And damage was extremely easy to do. There wasn't anything else that I could find, like moderator pre-approval.
Public groups were too much trouble under Google wave. A group of students collaborating on a private assignment? Not so much.
Thank you for contacting Garmin International. Unfortunately you will have to clear the trip log manually.
With Best Regards,
Jonathan P Product Support Specialist 2nd shift-OCC Garmin International 913-397-8200 800-800-1020 913-440-8280 (fax) Att: Jonathan P www.garmin.com
Original Message Follows:
Form Message Knowledge Job Ticket: {XXXX-XXX-XXX-XXXX-000000000000} Knowledge Session Log URL: undefined?session={XXXXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-000000000000}&forward=sesslog KnowledgeBase: garmin Subject: Disable tracklog RECORDING feature in Garmin Nuvi 255w Message Body: I see that there is a feature to hide the tracklog. There is also a feature to erase the current tracklog. If someone is concerned about privacy, is there a feature on the Garmin Nuvi 255w to make it simply not write the tracklog information out, so it doesn't need to be regularly erased? MarketName: On the Road ProductGroup: nuvi Series Product: nuvi 255W Type: General Question Full Name: [Atari Datacenter] First Name: [Atari] Last Name: [Datacenter] Email Address: [my email] Country: United States
A clarification (since there are so many Garmin models): the Garmin Nuvi line is what I had in mind. That would be the line that is aimed at automotive market (which related to the topic). Sample models would be 260, 265, 780, 255, 200, 205, and all the widescreen variants.
There is no way to turn of tracking on these standard automobile models. Someone mentioned the 60csx, which is a handheld unit and not aimed at the automotive market. Same with the GPSmap60csx.
Someone else asked how you convert the hidden garmin log to a useful format. It is an XML file called "Garmin/GPX/current.gpx". An very small sample of (personal) data in my unit. Yes, Google Earth can import the whole file and show you all the recorded trip information.
BTW, if I was a law enforcement officer, or a lawyer, a Garmin Nuvi would be a prime target for a search or subpoena.
(greater/less than symbols changed so that they are not interpret as HTML)
If you've got a halfway modern Garmin GPS, you have already been collecting the very data that this project is working for. What? Your GPS is logging you without permission? Yes. (Garmin probably got some legalese somewhere to cover their tracks.)
The Garmin GPS has a facility to show/hide your 'trail' (which is based on a time/location log of your travel). I believe it also has an option to reset that log. (Or, at the very least, you could USB mount its storage device and clean out the log file.) But even if you erase the log file, it will automatically repopulate your travel log, with or without your permission. There is no built-in option to prevent this behavior.
In short, a Garmin GPS *is* a GPS tracking device that your willingly put inside of your own vehicle, and is ready to report your travel history at any time.
I have personally verified this information with Garmin's technical support. You cannot disable GPS logging. Could be a plus for this project, though.
The real problem with the cable companies (and, unfortunately, even their competitors) is that they've stuck with their legacy monopoly model of service. Their objective isn't to give you want you want. Their objective is to sell you the packages they create.
Here, I just picked up cable service again and got the DVR from my cable company. It is littered and strewn with tons of junk channels. And I mean truly junk channels. I believe I marked over 200 channels to be skipped in the interface.
Of course, you can't say no to the cable company. When you mark 200 channels to be skipped, they still show up in the electronic program guide, cluttering it so much that it is really hard to use. But each channel that you see that you don't have is a selling opportunity.
This explains why they have not one, but three different channel numbers, scattered throughout the channelspace, for their on-demand service. (In addition to all the PPV channels, the porn channels, sports channels, special event channels, etc etc.)
Even when I pay for a huge package of channels that I don't want, they still manage to take away my ability to remove the ones I don't want.
Thanks, Cox. You've gotten better, but you still don't serve me. You make me serve you.
PS: Yes, I'd be happier if I abandon their DVR offering. Even after all these years, and all the revisions, it still isn't made with the end-user in mind. So very sad. Now if I could only pay for only the channels that I want.
Yeah. I've done a few of the Palm PDAs over the years, starting with the Palm Pilot Pro. Back then, those things were cutting edge, lots of software, lots of support. You looked at the device and you knew it had a future.
It just seems like, since then, the company has had high goals, but has been on a behind-the-curve downhill slide ever since.
I now look back with regret on my decision a little over a year ago to buy a Palm T|X. Little third party development these days. Almost no vendor support on the built-in software. And yet, somehow, these are still selling today for $250-$300?
Sadly, it only performs the following functions for me to today:
1. MP3 player 2. Notepad 3. Emergency wifi web browser
Palm only has one shot left, IMHO. They need to put something out there, and it needs to be WOW.
If this isn't a Killer OS, then it'll be the OS that killed the company.
Reading between the lines on the 'hormone imbalance' and weight loss, and not a stemming but a rapid regain of lost weight (by late Spring), it seems what Steve isn't saying here is that the doctors have put him on a Steroid (testosterone) supplement (testosterone replacement therapy) to put on weight.
Is there another underlying issue for the weight loss, or is Steve just becoming an old man (with the loss in testosterone that goes with it)? Who knows.
But I, for one, look forward to the new roid inspired designs yet to come from Apple.
1981: "Nobody will ever need more than 640k RAM!" -Allegedly Bill Gates 2008: "Nobody will ever need more than 250GB monthly traffic." -Comcast Corporation
I started with what I believe was called the Palm Pilot Pro. Wow! What a handheld marvel. It was the iPhone of its day (that neat tech gizmo that everyone had to have). So many new apps being developed for it!
Today, I have a Palm T|X. What do I use it for? #1: MP3 player #2: Video player on an airplane #3: Simple web access via WiFi in a pinch (or for boredom).
What has changed? The third party apps really have dried up. I used to see all sorts of neat things coming out for it on a daily basis. Today, I only see a few die-hards programming for the platform anymore.
The existing Palm line is dead. No life. You all should have been updating it, but you totally bet your business on the future. Bad mistake.
And what kind of a future will it be? Oh, you've got a mobile device like a unixy type platform. Kind of like the iPhone? Kind of like Android? Kind of like that LiMo foundation and the Symbian foundation? Good luck with all these well-backed competitors.
Palm: At this point, if you don't produce something completely stunning, you're dead.
I think the current full-sized arcade game market is a very good indication of how PC games will be priced.
Rare does not mean much. A Solvalou cockpit recently sold on eBay for around $300. A totally awesome game, and totally rare in the US. But there isn't any demand for it.
Take another game that is ultra-common, like Pac-Man, Centipede, Defender. They command a good price, and it is because people want them.
So price of collectible games is more tied to demand than supply. And there are times when a low supply and a high demand intersect. Examples would be Major Havoc (good vector game), or Dragon's Lair (memorable laserdisc game). These may have their price influenced because of their unusual technologies, both in making them unique, and also making them break easier.
Then again, it isn't just about a unique feature. Time Traveler (laserdisc with 3d projection) was quite unique, is low on supply, but also low in demand.
Other factors that affect value will be cosmestic condition and completeness. These play fairly big in arcade games today. But then again, these games ARE their appearance, because of the space they take.
So, anyhow, if I had to sum it all up, I would predict that PC games would have value based on: demand (familiarity and likability), completeness, and condition. But it won't be until you're an old old man that these will have value.
Slashdot Mirror
Discontinued, but still available for $110. http://www.frys.com/product/6708525
Also, hello again Brien King. But you knew me under a different username.
I am very pleased to see some good case design. I really like having a case that is fun to look at. (The odd thing with non-computer types is if they see a really snazzy case, they assume you've got some sort of super computer under the hood!) This one is a little interesting, but I don't think it is $400 worth. Myself, I recently got a lot of bang for the buck modding some NZXT Phantom cases. They've already got a very nice sci-fi design and look like props from Mass Effect. They are $90 shipped at TigerDirect right now, which is tough to beat. Large as hell, too. I think the only thing I really didn't like about it is that some of the older NZXT Phantom cases have USB 2.0 built in. The newer one I picked up had 2.0 and 3.0 built into the case. But back on topic, PLEASE, encourage cool case makers. I just don't think this one is $400 cool.
Too bad I don't have mod points here. You hit quite a number of points dead-on.
I would probably only know that the second core had finally been enabled for non-UI tasks if I had read an unofficial changelog (because TiVo does not produce one) in an unofficial TiVo forum. I believe you mean here:
http://www.tivocommunity.com/tivo-vb/showthread.php?t=480226
I will disregard your underlying message that missing an announcement that never came from TiVo nor actively pursuing an unofficial TiVo forum signifies that one does not actually own a TiVo. That's fanboy behavior. I do, however, congratulate you on your problem-free experience. I don't know how you small minority of users manage it.
My latest... no, my last purchase of a TiVo was the Premier with lifetime service. The unit is riddled with bugs.
I never expect them to get the second CPU core enabled. It is short of RAM. It bogs down. It ignores the remote for a while when you sit back down in front of the couch (which I suspect is because the OS swap out the remote control's handler process during a memory shortage). It crashes. It has a bare-bones Netflix interface that likes to crash. The high definition user interface is STILL incomplete, with many screens dropping back down to standard definition. The Amazon Video interface can't do free Prime movies. Only purchases. The non-discrete directional buttons on the remote makes for regular menu selection mistakes. If your Internet connection goes down, your locked out of much of the unit's functionality until you return.
I could go on and on about all the problems with their product. And I see that other people have their own observations. TiVo isn't in the game of producing a product/service that consumers want. We are actually just what they're selling. Collecting eyeballs for add space. And then adding bullet points for new features with minimal functionality and playing the patent race game.
Admittedly, the only good thing to come out of them recently was the iPad TiVo remote control. Nicely done. But then, they weren't doing it for their customers, I'm sure, as much as they were trying to beef up their patent portfolio, probably vs Apple.
If TiVo dies tomorrow, I won't be sad. I'll go back to the cable company's DVR and I'd enjoy it. Having all the pre-paid hardware and service is the only thing keeping me holding on. TiVo once put the customer first, but they lost sight of us. Too bad. These days, TiVo owners don't make great evangelists for their product.
The instructions were brand new and horribly incomplete at the time, but it was fun to hunt down all of the pieces to the puzzle on an environment I was completely unfamilar with. I was mostly interested in learning more about the Android platform, and also to enable Google's Android Marketplace and other Google apps.
I unrooted the Fire (so that Amazon Video on Demand would continue to work), and used the Marketplace to download a better video player app (MX Video Player) and a number of decent games. I didn't go with the Dolphin browser or the GO Launcher for my defaults. (Not that I'm excited about Amazon's launcher.) So basically, I have what acts like a stock Kindle Fire, except I've got Android Marketplace access. I think that combination makes this a winning device. I'll still purchase from Amazon when it makes sense, but I'll go to Google for selection.
The only significant snag I've seen so far is that the pop-up menu bar onto the Kindle Fire slightly confuses apps by a number of pixels about screen size or placement. Some apps will chop off the top of their app's display. Of course, others will use the bottom of the screen for their own menu bar, leaving you with scant pixels (in landscape mode) to hit their buttons. That, and a few apps like the VLC Direct player seems to get me into situations which lock my Kindle from time to time, so I mostly don't use it.
At least when I download Marketplace apps, I can delete applications now and now worry about them haunting my 'cloud applications' screen forever. If I download Angry Birds Free, and then pay for Angry Birds (and remove the free version), do I really need to see two different Angry Birds icons on my device forever, Amazon? Well, I asked, and you apologized that I couldn't delete it. You hinted that you may allow this in the future, and you gave me a $5 credit for my inconvenience. You're not so bad.
Anyhow, rooting and installing the Amazon Marketplace is a little bit of a bumpy road, but it seems to be totally worth it.
It was Saturday evening. Don't know how Sunday got mixed into this unless they were looking at UTC or something.
SCADA? I don't care about. Not directly. But the problem is that once the government says, "These aren't vulnerabilities or security holes. These are design issues." The problem is that you've set the example, and other software vendors are going to follow.
Example: "The denial of service attack against your application is not a security vulnerability, it is just a design issue that everything locks up for a while if it gets an incoming packet, and tries to resolve the IP address against its authoritative DNS server while that is DNS server is offline. We only do security fixes on old products / old releases. Sorry."
"Design issue, not a security vulnerability" is not a distinction you want easily drawn. Others will follow a government example if it is an easy out.
Thank you for all the work you put forward in entertaining me for free.
Please see their original report and press release. Here are some quotes from the August 5th press release:
"The political brinksmanship of recent months highlights what we see as America’s governance and policymaking becoming less stable, less effective, and less predictable than what we previously believed. The statutory debt ceiling and the threat of default have become political bargaining chips in the debate over fiscal policy."
"Compared with previous projections, our revised base case scenario now assumes that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, due to expire by the end of 2012, remain in place. We have changed our assumption on this because the majority of Republicans in Congress continue to resist any measure that would raise revenues, a position we believe Congress reinforced by passing the act. "
Their explanation didn't suddenly switch to political. It was there all along, yet so few pundits chose to focus on it.
I still remember the day the HP sales/technical team came on-site to give us a presentation. Flashy videos with Carly Fiorina's new vision of the future. And a bright tomorrow with a new CPU line... out with PA-RISC and in with Itanic. Their sales team looked at each other nervously as we expressed our evaluation of the arrangement as a failed vision. It didn't take them long to figure out that dumping their in-house CPU to go with the Itanic would doom them to irrelevancy. And it did.
Now the Itanium itself is sinking from irrelevancy. It took too long. This chip was a disaster. Glad to see it go.
Google Wave was only useful to me if I could trust 100% of the participants in the Wave. Yes, yes, there is a roll-back to undo damage. Not good enough.
If I had a group of Internet participants, that absolutely wasn't the case. There was no in-between. Either you trusted someone and they could do almost anything, or you didn't. And damage was extremely easy to do. There wasn't anything else that I could find, like moderator pre-approval.
Public groups were too much trouble under Google wave. A group of students collaborating on a private assignment? Not so much.
Disregard that. I now see you were talking about ATI's announcement.
An announcement without a release? I just bought one at Newegg. They have quite a large variety of GTX 460 cards available.
Support from Garmin support:
--- On Tue, 2/10/09, Product.Support@garmin.com wrote:
From: Product.Support@garmin.com
Subject: Re: Disable tracklog RECORDING feature in Garmin Nuvi 255w (KMMxxxxx)
Dear [AtariDatacenter],
Thank you for contacting Garmin International. Unfortunately you will have to clear the trip log manually.
With Best Regards,
Jonathan P
Product Support Specialist
2nd shift-OCC
Garmin International
913-397-8200
800-800-1020
913-440-8280 (fax) Att: Jonathan P
www.garmin.com
Original Message Follows:
Form Message
Knowledge Job Ticket:
{XXXX-XXX-XXX-XXXX-000000000000}
Knowledge Session Log URL:
undefined?session={XXXXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-000000000000}&forward=sesslog
KnowledgeBase:
garmin
Subject:
Disable tracklog RECORDING feature in Garmin Nuvi 255w
Message Body:
I see that there is a feature to hide the tracklog. There is also a feature to erase the current tracklog. If someone is concerned about privacy, is there a feature on the Garmin Nuvi 255w to make it simply not write the tracklog information out, so it doesn't need to be regularly erased?
MarketName:
On the Road
ProductGroup:
nuvi Series
Product:
nuvi 255W
Type:
General Question
Full Name:
[Atari Datacenter]
First Name:
[Atari]
Last Name:
[Datacenter]
Email Address:
[my email]
Country:
United States
Wow. Lots of poo-pooing. But partially my fault.
A clarification (since there are so many Garmin models): the Garmin Nuvi line is what I had in mind. That would be the line that is aimed at automotive market (which related to the topic). Sample models would be 260, 265, 780, 255, 200, 205, and all the widescreen variants.
There is no way to turn of tracking on these standard automobile models. Someone mentioned the 60csx, which is a handheld unit and not aimed at the automotive market. Same with the GPSmap60csx.
Someone else asked how you convert the hidden garmin log to a useful format. It is an XML file called "Garmin/GPX/current.gpx". An very small sample of (personal) data in my unit. Yes, Google Earth can import the whole file and show you all the recorded trip information.
BTW, if I was a law enforcement officer, or a lawyer, a Garmin Nuvi would be a prime target for a search or subpoena.
(greater/less than symbols changed so that they are not interpret as HTML)
[trkpt lat="36.038740" lon="-95.858903"][ele]222.20[/ele][time]2009-10-29T16:57:40Z[/time][/trkpt][trkpt lat="36.042936" lon="-95.859010"][ele]224.12[/ele][time]2009-10-29T16:57:56Z[/time][/trkpt][trkpt lat="36.047925" lon="-95.859132"][ele]223.64[/ele][time]2009-10-29T16:58:15Z[/time][/trkpt][trkpt lat="36.052912" lon="-95.859232"][ele]214.03[/ele][time]2009-10-29T16:58:34Z[/time][/trkpt][trkpt lat="36.057339" lon="-95.859322"][ele]220.76[/ele][time]2009-10-29T16:58:51Z[/time][/trkpt][trkpt lat="36.062054" lon="-95.859349"][ele]226.05[/ele][time]2009-10-29T16:59:09Z[/time][/trkpt][trkpt lat="36.067054" lon="-95.859362"][ele]225.57[/ele][time]2009-10-29T16:59:28Z[/time][/trkpt][trkpt lat="36.070989" lon="-95.859362"][ele]222.20[/ele][time]2009-10-29T16:59:43Z[/time][/trkpt][trkpt lat="36.075946" lon="-95.859369"][ele]226.05[/ele][time]2009-10-29T17:00:02Z[/time][/trkpt][trkpt lat="36.081213" lon="-95.859372"][ele]217.40[/ele][time]2009-10-29T17:00:22Z[/time][/trkpt][trkpt lat="36.083537" lon="-95.859033"][ele]218.36[/ele][time]2009-10-29T17:00:31Z[/time][/trkpt][trkpt lat="36.086452" lon="-95.858473"][ele]221.24[/ele][time]2009-10-29T17:00:43Z[/time][/trkpt][trkpt lat="36.088155" lon="-95.858393"][ele]218.84[/ele][time]2009-10-29T17:00:50Z[/time][/trkpt][trkpt lat="36.090343" lon="-95.858698"][ele]215.95[/ele][time]2009-10-29T17:00:58Z[/time][/trkpt][trkpt lat="36.093297" lon="-95.859247"][ele]207.30[/ele][time]2009-10-29T17:01:09Z[/time][/trkpt][trkpt lat="36.095859" lon="-95.859524"][ele]201.53[/ele][time]2009-10-29T17:01:19Z[/time][/trkpt][trkpt lat="36.097290" lon="-95.859562"][ele]204.42[/ele][time]2009-10-29T17:01:26Z[/time][/trkpt][trkpt lat="36.098406" lon="-95.859619"][ele]206.82[/ele][time]2009-10-29T17:01:34Z[/time][/trkpt][trkpt lat="36.098967" lon="-95.859507"][ele]207.78[/ele][time]2009-10-29T17:01:40Z[/time][/trkpt][trkpt lat="36.099055" lon="-95.859468"][ele]207.78[/ele][time]2009-10-29T17:01:41Z[/time][/trkpt]
If you've got a halfway modern Garmin GPS, you have already been collecting the very data that this project is working for. What? Your GPS is logging you without permission? Yes. (Garmin probably got some legalese somewhere to cover their tracks.)
The Garmin GPS has a facility to show/hide your 'trail' (which is based on a time/location log of your travel). I believe it also has an option to reset that log. (Or, at the very least, you could USB mount its storage device and clean out the log file.) But even if you erase the log file, it will automatically repopulate your travel log, with or without your permission. There is no built-in option to prevent this behavior.
In short, a Garmin GPS *is* a GPS tracking device that your willingly put inside of your own vehicle, and is ready to report your travel history at any time.
I have personally verified this information with Garmin's technical support. You cannot disable GPS logging. Could be a plus for this project, though.
The real problem with the cable companies (and, unfortunately, even their competitors) is that they've stuck with their legacy monopoly model of service. Their objective isn't to give you want you want. Their objective is to sell you the packages they create.
Here, I just picked up cable service again and got the DVR from my cable company. It is littered and strewn with tons of junk channels. And I mean truly junk channels. I believe I marked over 200 channels to be skipped in the interface.
Of course, you can't say no to the cable company. When you mark 200 channels to be skipped, they still show up in the electronic program guide, cluttering it so much that it is really hard to use. But each channel that you see that you don't have is a selling opportunity.
This explains why they have not one, but three different channel numbers, scattered throughout the channelspace, for their on-demand service. (In addition to all the PPV channels, the porn channels, sports channels, special event channels, etc etc.)
Even when I pay for a huge package of channels that I don't want, they still manage to take away my ability to remove the ones I don't want.
Thanks, Cox. You've gotten better, but you still don't serve me. You make me serve you.
PS: Yes, I'd be happier if I abandon their DVR offering. Even after all these years, and all the revisions, it still isn't made with the end-user in mind. So very sad. Now if I could only pay for only the channels that I want.
Yeah. I've done a few of the Palm PDAs over the years, starting with the Palm Pilot Pro. Back then, those things were cutting edge, lots of software, lots of support. You looked at the device and you knew it had a future.
It just seems like, since then, the company has had high goals, but has been on a behind-the-curve downhill slide ever since.
I now look back with regret on my decision a little over a year ago to buy a Palm T|X. Little third party development these days. Almost no vendor support on the built-in software. And yet, somehow, these are still selling today for $250-$300?
Sadly, it only performs the following functions for me to today:
1. MP3 player
2. Notepad
3. Emergency wifi web browser
Palm only has one shot left, IMHO. They need to put something out there, and it needs to be WOW.
If this isn't a Killer OS, then it'll be the OS that killed the company.
Reading between the lines on the 'hormone imbalance' and weight loss, and not a stemming but a rapid regain of lost weight (by late Spring), it seems what Steve isn't saying here is that the doctors have put him on a Steroid (testosterone) supplement (testosterone replacement therapy) to put on weight.
Is there another underlying issue for the weight loss, or is Steve just becoming an old man (with the loss in testosterone that goes with it)? Who knows.
But I, for one, look forward to the new roid inspired designs yet to come from Apple.
I never ran across racism in a video game until Team Fortress 2's Demoman. Some people really seem to have a problem with that character.
1981: "Nobody will ever need more than 640k RAM!" -Allegedly Bill Gates
2008: "Nobody will ever need more than 250GB monthly traffic." -Comcast Corporation
I started with what I believe was called the Palm Pilot Pro. Wow! What a handheld marvel. It was the iPhone of its day (that neat tech gizmo that everyone had to have). So many new apps being developed for it!
Today, I have a Palm T|X. What do I use it for? #1: MP3 player #2: Video player on an airplane #3: Simple web access via WiFi in a pinch (or for boredom).
What has changed? The third party apps really have dried up. I used to see all sorts of neat things coming out for it on a daily basis. Today, I only see a few die-hards programming for the platform anymore.
The existing Palm line is dead. No life. You all should have been updating it, but you totally bet your business on the future. Bad mistake.
And what kind of a future will it be? Oh, you've got a mobile device like a unixy type platform. Kind of like the iPhone? Kind of like Android? Kind of like that LiMo foundation and the Symbian foundation? Good luck with all these well-backed competitors.
Palm: At this point, if you don't produce something completely stunning, you're dead.
Anyone remember the guy who's TiVo started recording a lot of gay movies? "My TiVo thinks I'm gay!"
There is a lot of room to make big mistakes in this area of computing. Contextual Computing can lead to hilarious failures.
I think the current full-sized arcade game market is a very good indication of how PC games will be priced.
Rare does not mean much. A Solvalou cockpit recently sold on eBay for around $300. A totally awesome game, and totally rare in the US. But there isn't any demand for it.
Take another game that is ultra-common, like Pac-Man, Centipede, Defender. They command a good price, and it is because people want them.
So price of collectible games is more tied to demand than supply. And there are times when a low supply and a high demand intersect. Examples would be Major Havoc (good vector game), or Dragon's Lair (memorable laserdisc game). These may have their price influenced because of their unusual technologies, both in making them unique, and also making them break easier.
Then again, it isn't just about a unique feature. Time Traveler (laserdisc with 3d projection) was quite unique, is low on supply, but also low in demand.
Other factors that affect value will be cosmestic condition and completeness. These play fairly big in arcade games today. But then again, these games ARE their appearance, because of the space they take.
So, anyhow, if I had to sum it all up, I would predict that PC games would have value based on: demand (familiarity and likability), completeness, and condition. But it won't be until you're an old old man that these will have value.