Not just sharks but everyone in law enforcement out on patrol should be recording their activities so that confrontations with citizens can be reviewed objectively and perhaps avoided altogether. Just because they carry frickin' lasers instead of guns should not make a difference.
The sharks really should have body cams but this is the next best thing.
Diversity for the sake of diversity is NOT a good thing.
Diversity for its own sake does in fact have some value, but it has costs as well, and in principle it's just as illegal and repugnant as any other form of discrimination.
Far too many genuinely don't understand why this is true. They've been so sheltered from unequal opportunity that they take it for granted and assume the equality people have been fighting and dying for for hundreds of years must be something else.
We will have to keep spelling out "equal opportunity" until they clue in.
So anyone who can write a program for that platform that is still running problem-free after 30 years deserves to be making stacks of cash in the embedded/IoT space.
For contemporary bloatware, that might be true. If it's a simple program doing the same thing for 30 years, it could be full of bugs that just haven't surfaced yet.
They are not the same. "Installation" can be an action, and abstract category, or a result. "Instal" can only refer to an action. "Install" is spelled wrong.
It would be easier for the corporations and governments they own to just take citizenship away from those pesky humans, and level the human and robot playing field that way.
There are very few people who believe any of these threats genuinely pose a risk of the extinction of the human species, or even setting back civilization more than a few decades or so.
But there is a lot of human suffering that could happen before that level of disaster occurs. A whole lot.
Slashdot Mirror
Not just sharks but everyone in law enforcement out on patrol should be recording their activities so that confrontations with citizens can be reviewed objectively and perhaps avoided altogether. Just because they carry frickin' lasers instead of guns should not make a difference.
The sharks really should have body cams but this is the next best thing.
Diversity for the sake of diversity is NOT a good thing.
Diversity for its own sake does in fact have some value, but it has costs as well, and in principle it's just as illegal and repugnant as any other form of discrimination.
equal opportunity does not mean equal outcome
Far too many genuinely don't understand why this is true. They've been so sheltered from unequal opportunity that they take it for granted and assume the equality people have been fighting and dying for for hundreds of years must be something else.
We will have to keep spelling out "equal opportunity" until they clue in.
No, those who want to do it more than they want to avoid putting up with harassing, unprofessional, boorish assholes, are doing it already.
In other words, *exactly* the same as men.
If you think all men are equally content with dysfunctional workplace cultures, well, that's just sexist.
The CEOs just want to portray the menial jobs as 'cool' so they can reduce wages even further.
So anyone who can write a program for that platform that is still running problem-free after 30 years deserves to be making stacks of cash in the embedded/IoT space.
For contemporary bloatware, that might be true. If it's a simple program doing the same thing for 30 years, it could be full of bugs that just haven't surfaced yet.
So, you're saying it's a mainframe?
Palpatine's predecessor is the one who sent the two special-ops assassins to "settle" the "conflict".
Why don't we do world peace?
Do you quibble with Wall Street over earnings reports as well, because they're all bad at math?
Yes, I do.
Though I would use the word 'dishonest' rather than 'bad'.
They are not the same. "Installation" can be an action, and abstract category, or a result. "Instal" can only refer to an action. "Install" is spelled wrong.
It would be easier for the corporations and governments they own to just take citizenship away from those pesky humans, and level the human and robot playing field that way.
systemic bias against those with a specific set of... skills
That's every job interview.
The alleged "origami flat-pack robot" had components that weren't paper.
It does not take much of any skill to be useful. There's always a certain amount of entry-level work that has value.
It takes god-like powers, however, to be competitive in today's job market, which I suspect might be the question actually intended.
Because not all "small changes" are equal.
There are very few people who believe any of these threats genuinely pose a risk of the extinction of the human species, or even setting back civilization more than a few decades or so.
But there is a lot of human suffering that could happen before that level of disaster occurs. A whole lot.
Now, I'm really curious - what does he think is different about the lab versus any other workplace?
If they aren't also calling for "safe spaces" for vulnerable men etc., then, yes.
Seriously, Dice seems truly surprised that the Slashdot crowd can tell bad user interfaces and web page designs from good ones.
No, they can take back their power and responsibilities at any time.
Every single day that they don't should be considered a separate act of treason.
Is it really as dire as a civil war?
The 1% are trying to reduce the 99% to serfs. And succeeding.
What would you call it?
The US started with a rebellion.
Which pretty much sums up his attitude about the rule of law.
Yes, but the Executive telling the Judiciary what the law is is completely backwards in the first place.
Economist also believe that money is what determines what is true.