That's an interesting application, because there's a category of people who can walk perfectly fine 99.9% of the time and are therefore deemed to have a legitimate medial need for a wheelchair because the 0.1% could mean serious injury. They need something but the wheelchair is overkill.
There's no doubt it would be abused by the marginally disabled or even the merely lazy, but at least this might actually help some disabled people achieve independence. Far too often measures allegedly for the disabled are implemented to make a political statement - and the effective statement is the one that spends enormous amounts of money to underline, rather than overcome, disabilities.
This is the part that's puzzling me. Proof of a direct trade link would be interesting, but easily a thousand years earlier everyone in the Mediterranean would traded with each other and with the Nile Valley/Red Sea area. The Carthaginians especially.
Though the quantity they found does suggest bigger volume of trade, whether direct or indirect, than previously estimated.
And after all the abuse of privacy, the outcomes aren't even that good.
I searched for one item, went to a store and bought it the same day, and for months I'm being shown adverts for an item I am no longer searching for. It doesn't 'know' something about me, it's taking a guess and it's wrong.
Because people need to know that legal information may be informative in general but is still not necessarily a legal opinion and people should be able to make informed decisions about how far they will follow whatever is suggested.
Behaving ethically pretty much proves he's not a lawyer, but it's nice that it's explicit.
Slashdot Mirror
The economists love to say that trade is great for everyone.
Trade the economic concept is great if there's a level playing field. "Free" "trade" the Orwellian slogan is about rent-seeking and feudalism.
That's an interesting application, because there's a category of people who can walk perfectly fine 99.9% of the time and are therefore deemed to have a legitimate medial need for a wheelchair because the 0.1% could mean serious injury. They need something but the wheelchair is overkill.
There's no doubt it would be abused by the marginally disabled or even the merely lazy, but at least this might actually help some disabled people achieve independence. Far too often measures allegedly for the disabled are implemented to make a political statement - and the effective statement is the one that spends enormous amounts of money to underline, rather than overcome, disabilities.
Wait, "Airport Workers" is a terrorist organization? But the airports are crawling with them...
this straw poll doesn't actually have any real-world effect other than being useful as a way to mislead the public
That's what the entire campaign is about.
Given who's running, Gates starts to look pretty good.
Unless they are already a cartel....
Insurance companies can only raise rates if they can prove that their losses
which is why they more often just quietly reduce coverage.
This is the part that's puzzling me. Proof of a direct trade link would be interesting, but easily a thousand years earlier everyone in the Mediterranean would traded with each other and with the Nile Valley/Red Sea area. The Carthaginians especially.
Though the quantity they found does suggest bigger volume of trade, whether direct or indirect, than previously estimated.
And after all the abuse of privacy, the outcomes aren't even that good.
I searched for one item, went to a store and bought it the same day, and for months I'm being shown adverts for an item I am no longer searching for. It doesn't 'know' something about me, it's taking a guess and it's wrong.
But only because using actual people is no longer cost effective.
Yes, it's very unfair to men that they don't have their own pronouns.
Pen and notebook until all that is ready.
So why should he be in jail?
He was in an inherent conflict of interest. That's the illegal part.
But very few people can fake that for their entire career.
Actually being honest is less work. It just takes a minimum of courage.
We can have faster-than-light travel after all! It turns out all we have to do is 'overcome' Special Relativity!
I hope someone will helpfully tell which ones are the fascists and which ones are the thugs. I sure wouldn't want to have to do any thinking about it.
Not very sporting...
Oh! If only the government had destroyed even more freedom and tightened the surveillance state! When will we ever learn?
Untestable now does not imply untestable in the future.
Untested theories are not the equal of experimentally verified theory.
That does not mean they are completely without value.
It's not either-or.
Question: Are some physicists theoretical physicists while others are experimental physicists?
Answer: Duh...
Because people need to know that legal information may be informative in general but is still not necessarily a legal opinion and people should be able to make informed decisions about how far they will follow whatever is suggested.
Behaving ethically pretty much proves he's not a lawyer, but it's nice that it's explicit.
Like what... birth rate control?
Is that what you think social workers spend their time on?
A skeptic is dubious in good faith. A denialist is incredulous in bad faith.
Denialism was the correct term.