And they sneaked her into a role where the casual viewer would think she was just a switchboard operator, but in fact she would have had one of the highest security clearances on the entire ship.
Why is this suddenly "stealing" if you are in Canada?
Bell has been a monopoly or pseudo-monopoly for so long that they genuinely think that the law is whatever they happen to make up when someone isn't having money extorted from them.
If they are a minor, they can be treated as such according to the criminal law of their jurisdiction -- after they identify themselves to law enforcement and provide proof of age. Until then I'm not buying it.
'Mysterious' flights happen because they *like* breaking the law. It's really not saving them much in the way of time, effort, cost, etc. There is no shortage of legitimate ways for the FBI to conduct surveillance. And for situations requiring warrants, warrants are laughably easy to obtain.
The solution versus problem is a fine balancing act. I've had supervisors who simply didn't want to know about problems before they were solved, which was gross dereliction of duty, especially given that she was the only person with the authority to take some of the steps needed. Raising a problem without going through a trouble-shooting checklist is negligently creating unnecessary work for others. The trick is recognizing the point where additional resources, and which ones, are needed, and that's not as easy as people make it sound.
Slashdot Mirror
And they sneaked her into a role where the casual viewer would think she was just a switchboard operator, but in fact she would have had one of the highest security clearances on the entire ship.
... and decimated an entire country's agricultural industry, since it was the place that made all the veterinary medicine.
Maybe it was the rival terrorist gang's headquarters.
Why go to the trouble to stand anywhere? They'll use Photoshop. I mean, GIMP.
Why is this suddenly "stealing" if you are in Canada?
Bell has been a monopoly or pseudo-monopoly for so long that they genuinely think that the law is whatever they happen to make up when someone isn't having money extorted from them.
If they are a minor, they can be treated as such according to the criminal law of their jurisdiction -- after they identify themselves to law enforcement and provide proof of age. Until then I'm not buying it.
Followed by,
"I know all the languages; what else do I need to get an entry level job. Any job. I haven't worked in years -- I'm desperate! Please!"
High unemployment has a terrible social cost.
The question becomes, what did the EPA do with the evidence?
There is nothing less socially acceptable than being the president of Bell Media.
By which you mean customers will be paying an extra fee for the privilege of having their freedoms (actual freedoms, not the slogan) trampled on.
Helping monopolies shut out new competition is just a happy by-product.
That's synergy!
Unless they are a scam artist instead of an entertainer.
The correct word is feudalism.
And every piece of legislation gets rewritten into a single bill.
They don't even bother reading them now - it would get that much worse.
5% of... all
Or approximately 5%.
will the outlet try to infect my computer
Yes.
'Mysterious' flights happen because they *like* breaking the law. It's really not saving them much in the way of time, effort, cost, etc. There is no shortage of legitimate ways for the FBI to conduct surveillance. And for situations requiring warrants, warrants are laughably easy to obtain.
They thought cable guaranteed them an income without them having to provide any additional value, or even any value.
They are slowly - very slowly - beginning to get a dim idea that that might no longer be the case.
I do not feel sorry for them. I will continue to boycott them no matter how much they may pretend to change.
Of course, I'm Type II
I.e. a completely different disorder with some symptoms in common.
The Onion may be satirical, but it's fact-checking is about as good as mainstream 'journalists'.
It's already cost that. The 'tens of cents' will be extra.
The solution versus problem is a fine balancing act. I've had supervisors who simply didn't want to know about problems before they were solved, which was gross dereliction of duty, especially given that she was the only person with the authority to take some of the steps needed. Raising a problem without going through a trouble-shooting checklist is negligently creating unnecessary work for others. The trick is recognizing the point where additional resources, and which ones, are needed, and that's not as easy as people make it sound.
I would agree that "pancreas" is an exaggeration but it's really good news nonetheless.
says 'no'.
They love Freedom(tm) that much!