But if it was evolution alone, other species would have it too.
Evolutionary innovations don't work like that. There's a species that's first. It might not keep the monopoly for long, but humans haven't been around for long.
That's fantastic advice if "yourself" is in the top 1% of the most awesome prospects. Those people don't need any advice at all.
The best the rest of us can do is to be ourselves after first improving ourselves.
Unfortunately you can't get to the long term without short term and in reality, being fake is phenomenally successful for the short to medium term. It generally works as long as the plausible deniability lasts.
People fail to understand is that bubbles are not bad for the people who are lucky enough to get out in time. (And, yes, it's usually simply a matter of luck.) They are only bad for everyone else.
Financial analysts are the last people with an incentive to tell people about a bubble if they suspect one.
All these behaviours are heuristics that work on average, and work even though in the real world information is imperfect. You can't know with certainty ahead of time what the outcome of any of these strategies will be.
In real life, which so many experts seem uninterested in, the participants in the prisoner's dilemma need to keep quiet until they've talked to a lawyer.
Slashdot Mirror
1. An active area denial weapon.
There could be complications.
you are going to have to pry my auto-turret from my cold dead fingers.
No, they'll have a robot to do that for them.
Furthermore, there was no requirement to stay in the union when the US was formed
You've never read the Articles of Confederation, have you?
You've never read the Declaration of Independence, have you?
Being yourself has far more to do with actually being honest in not only who you are, but the kind of people you want to hang around with.
This works if you are already the "right" kind of person. It is counter-productive for everyone else.
And you can't fool the people who have already tried it.
But if it was evolution alone, other species would have it too.
Evolutionary innovations don't work like that. There's a species that's first. It might not keep the monopoly for long, but humans haven't been around for long.
The age old advice still stands: be yourself.
That's fantastic advice if "yourself" is in the top 1% of the most awesome prospects. Those people don't need any advice at all.
The best the rest of us can do is to be ourselves after first improving ourselves.
Unfortunately you can't get to the long term without short term and in reality, being fake is phenomenally successful for the short to medium term. It generally works as long as the plausible deniability lasts.
If you think talking to children is sufficient, then you are a classic example of why it's not.
That doesn't even work with most adults.
If Al Gore is your idea of a scientist, then you don't get an opinion on what is or isn't settled.
You try telling one of them they've been replaced by the other.
People fail to understand is that bubbles are not bad for the people who are lucky enough to get out in time. (And, yes, it's usually simply a matter of luck.) They are only bad for everyone else.
Financial analysts are the last people with an incentive to tell people about a bubble if they suspect one.
Maybe a few humans can work *for* the robots keeping the PHBs out of their way while they get the actual job done.
"Gather your personal effects and vacate the premises. You have twenty seconds to comply."
Why does one have to come out on top?
It doesn't *necessarily* end with one coming out on top but that is with the set of possibilities, so it's worth thinking about.
Then the 0.001% with natural immunity will rule the world.
the '85 Lynch film... did an excellent job of capturing the atmosphere of the milieu.
So... it captured the atmosphere of middle but not the rest of it?
The truck would actually be an aircraft carrier, of sorts.
More info: 80% of first businesses fail, but only 40% of *second* businesses fail
Maybe half of them didn't want to go through the experience again.
All these behaviours are heuristics that work on average, and work even though in the real world information is imperfect. You can't know with certainty ahead of time what the outcome of any of these strategies will be.
They don't survive if everybody else co-operates to beat up the hoarder and take the keys from them.
It's a strategy, and it has risks - same as every other strategy.
In real life, which so many experts seem uninterested in, the participants in the prisoner's dilemma need to keep quiet until they've talked to a lawyer.
People weren't unemployed as such under feudalism but that economic system still left something to be desired for the majority.
Places outside the US exist.
That was before lasers.
w.r.t. is with respect to and about is not an exact equivalent.
not viewing programming as engineering is, in my opinion, one of the main reasons so much software is utter garbage.
I think you have the cause and effect backwards.